Oilers 0, Sharks 7 — Apr 18, 2017

EDMOilers

0–7

FINAL

SJSSharks

Shots23EDM

Shots32SJS

Model stars

1PavelskiSJSA+2CoutureSJSA+3JonesSJSA

Apr 18, 2017 · SAP Center at San Jose

Goal horn off

EDMOilers

0–7

FINAL P3

SJSSharks

Shots

EDM23

Model stars

1PavelskiSJSA+2CoutureSJSA+3JonesSJSA

Shots

SJS32

Apr 18, 2017 · SAP Center at San Jose

Goal horn off

Situation:

EDM38.0%SJS62.0%

Includes power plays, overtime and empty-net play. Chance share is not win probability.

Even-Strength Edge

≈ roughly even

Unavailable in this filter.

Even-strength xG share is unavailable in this filter.

Special Teams Edge

SJS dominated

SJS created 1.71 more power-play xG.

EDM

1.04xGSJS

2.76xG

01.53

Goaltending Edge

SJS above expected

SJS gained the goalie advantage.

EDM

-3.3GSAxSJS

+2.3GSAx

−40+4

Finishing Luck

SJS finished above expected

SJS are benefiting more from finishing luck.

EDM

-2.27G−xGSJS

+3.29G−xG

−40+4

Even-strength edge

≈ roughly even

Even-strength xG share is unavailable in this filter.

Special teams edge

SJS dominated

EDM

1.04xGSJS

2.76xG

01.53

Goaltending edge

SJS above expected

EDM

-3.3GSAxSJS

+2.3GSAx

−40+4

Finishing luck

SJS finished above expected

EDM

-2.27G−xGSJS

+3.29G−xG

−40+4

All situations

EDM

SJS

Period:

Chances:

View:

Loading shot map...

Win probability

Team:

EDM

0.0% WP

100.0% WP

SJS

Scrub game time · 60:00

SJS 7-0 EDM

End of Game

60:00

5v5

EDM

0.0%

SJS

100.0%

Event impact

Unavailable for this event

WP reflects the current game state at 5v5.

Loading goaltenders…

Loading players…

Game flow pressure

Attacking pressure over time based on shots and chance quality.

EDM had the longest sustained stretch from 5:55 P1 to 4:45 P1, while SJS's best response came from 18:15 P2 to 17:05 P2.

SJS pressureEDM pressureGoalPower play

Scrub game time · 0:00 P3

0:00 P3EDM held a slight edge

SJS

Pressure

0.00

0 shots · 0.00 xG

EDM

Pressure

1.32

3 shots · 0.15 xG

High-danger chances: SJS 0 · EDM 0. Tap or drag across the chart, or use the time slider.

2.1xG1.4

0.4xG3.5

1.5xG1.0

EDM at SJS

Game ControlChance share: EDM 38.0%, SJS 62.0%Collapse

Shot qualityExplore shot locations and the quality of each scoring chance.Collapse

Game storyFollow win probability and attacking pressure as the game unfolds.Collapse

Win probability

Goaltender duelBoth starters on results, workload and the quality of shots they facedCollapse

PlayersTop game grade: Joe Pavelski (SJS), A+Collapse

LinesFive-on-five forward lines, defensive pairings, and matchupsExplore

Event timelineEvery goal, penalty and shot in orderExplore

Box scoreOfficial team, skater, and goalie stats.Explore

Game summary

Game flow pressure