Mammoth 2, Sharks 3 — Nov 18, 2025

UTAMammoth

2–3

FINAL

SJSSharks

Shots26UTA

Shots22SJS

Model stars

1SchmidtUTAA+2MarinoUTAA+3CrouseUTAA

Nov 18, 2025 · SAP Center at San Jose

Goal horn off

UTAMammoth

2–3

FINAL OT

SJSSharks

Shots

UTA26

Model stars

1SchmidtUTAA+2MarinoUTAA+3CrouseUTAA

Shots

SJS22

Nov 18, 2025 · SAP Center at San Jose

Goal horn off

Situation:

UTA58.8%SJS41.2%

Includes power plays, overtime and empty-net play. Chance share is not win probability.

Even-Strength Edge

≈ roughly even

Unavailable in this filter.

Even-strength xG share is unavailable in this filter.

Special Teams Edge

≈ roughly even

Power-play chance quality was roughly even.

UTA

0.37xGSJS

0.55xG

01.252.5

Goaltending Edge

SJS above expected

SJS gained the goalie advantage.

UTA

-1.4GSAxSJS

+0.3GSAx

−40+4

Finishing Luck

SJS finished above expected

SJS are benefiting more from finishing luck.

UTA

-0.27G−xGSJS

+1.41G−xG

−40+4

Even-strength edge

≈ roughly even

Even-strength xG share is unavailable in this filter.

Special teams edge

≈ roughly even

UTA

0.37xGSJS

0.55xG

01.252.5

Goaltending edge

SJS above expected

UTA

-1.4GSAxSJS

+0.3GSAx

−40+4

Finishing luck

SJS finished above expected

UTA

-0.27G−xGSJS

+1.41G−xG

−40+4

All situations

UTA

SJS

Period:

Chances:

View:

Loading shot map...

Win probability

Team:

UTA

0.0% WP

100.0% WP

SJS

Scrub game time · 62:52

SJS 3-2 UTA

End of Game

62:52

4v3 · PP

UTA

0.0%

SJS

100.0%

Event impact

Unavailable for this event

SJS are on the power play at 4v3.

Loading goaltenders…

Loading players…

Game flow pressure

Attacking pressure over time based on shots and chance quality.

SJS had the longest sustained stretch from 10:30 P2 to 8:55 P2, while UTA's best response came from 7:00 P1 to 5:30 P1.

SJS pressureUTA pressureGoalPower play

Scrub game time · 2:10 OT

2:10 OTSJS had the edge

SJS

Pressure

0.93

1 shot · 0.15 xG

UTA

Pressure

0.00

0 shots · 0.00 xG

High-danger chances: SJS 0 · UTA 0. Tap or drag across the chart, or use the time slider.

1.6xG1.3

1.4xG0.9

1.7xG0.5

0.1xG0.2

UTA at SJS

Game ControlChance share: UTA 58.8%, SJS 41.2%Collapse

Shot qualityExplore shot locations and the quality of each scoring chance.Collapse

Game storyFollow win probability and attacking pressure as the game unfolds.Collapse

Win probability

Goaltender duelBoth starters on results, workload and the quality of shots they facedCollapse

PlayersTop game grade: Nate Schmidt (UTA), A+Collapse

LinesFive-on-five forward lines, defensive pairings, and matchupsExplore

Event timelineEvery goal, penalty and shot in orderExplore

Box scoreOfficial team, skater, and goalie stats.Explore

Game summary

Game flow pressure