Mammoth 0, Blues 1 — Nov 29, 2025

UTAMammoth

0–1

FINAL

STLBlues

Shots18UTA

Shots19STL

Model stars

1BrobergSTLA+2HollowaySTLA+3DeSimoneUTAA+

Nov 29, 2025 · Enterprise Center

Goal horn off

UTAMammoth

0–1

FINAL P3

STLBlues

Shots

UTA18

Model stars

1BrobergSTLA+2HollowaySTLA+3DeSimoneUTAA+

Shots

STL19

Nov 29, 2025 · Enterprise Center

Goal horn off

Situation:

UTA42.1%STL57.9%

Includes power plays, overtime and empty-net play. Chance share is not win probability.

Even-Strength Edge

≈ roughly even

Unavailable in this filter.

Even-strength xG share is unavailable in this filter.

Special Teams Edge

≈ roughly even

Power-play chance quality was roughly even.

UTA

1.20xGSTL

1.31xG

01.252.5

Goaltending Edge

Both above expected · STL better

STL gained the goalie advantage.

UTA

+2.0GSAxSTL

+2.2GSAx

−40+4

Finishing Luck

Both below expected · STL closer

Finishing variance has affected both teams similarly.

UTA

-2.16G−xGSTL

-1.97G−xG

−40+4

Even-strength edge

≈ roughly even

Even-strength xG share is unavailable in this filter.

Special teams edge

≈ roughly even

UTA

1.20xGSTL

1.31xG

01.252.5

Goaltending edge

Both above expected · STL better

UTA

+2.0GSAxSTL

+2.2GSAx

−40+4

Finishing luck

Both below expected · STL closer

UTA

-2.16G−xGSTL

-1.97G−xG

−40+4

All situations

UTA

STL

Period:

Chances:

View:

Loading shot map...

Win probability

Team:

UTA

0.0% WP

100.0% WP

STL

Scrub game time · 60:00

STL 1-0 UTA

End of Game

60:00

5v6 · EN

UTA

0.0%

STL

100.0%

Event impact

Unavailable for this event

UTA have the extra attacker at 5v6.

Loading goaltenders…

Loading players…

Game flow pressure

Attacking pressure over time based on shots and chance quality.

STL had the longest sustained stretch from 1:20 P2 to 18:20 P3, while STL's best response came from 18:00 P1 to 16:30 P1.

STL pressureUTA pressureGoalPower play

Scrub game time · 0:00 P3

0:00 P3UTA dominated

STL

Pressure

0.00

0 shots · 0.00 xG

UTA

Pressure

4.03

7 shots · 0.49 xG

High-danger chances: STL 0 · UTA 0. Tap or drag across the chart, or use the time slider.

0.7xG1.4

1.3xG1.8

2.2xG1.1

UTA at STL

Game ControlChance share: UTA 42.1%, STL 57.9%Collapse

Shot qualityExplore shot locations and the quality of each scoring chance.Collapse

Game storyFollow win probability and attacking pressure as the game unfolds.Collapse

Win probability

Goaltender duelBoth starters on results, workload and the quality of shots they facedCollapse

PlayersTop game grade: Philip Broberg (STL), A+Collapse

LinesFive-on-five forward lines, defensive pairings, and matchupsExplore

Event timelineEvery goal, penalty and shot in orderExplore

Box scoreOfficial team, skater, and goalie stats.Explore

Game summary

Game flow pressure