Canucks 2, Mammoth 6 — Feb 2, 2026

VANCanucks

2–6

FINAL

UTAMammoth

Shots24VAN

Shots19UTA

Model stars

1MarinoUTAA+2SchmaltzUTAA+3KellerUTAA+

Feb 2, 2026 · Delta Center

Goal horn off

VANCanucks

2–6

FINAL P3

UTAMammoth

Shots

VAN24

Model stars

1MarinoUTAA+2SchmaltzUTAA+3KellerUTAA+

Shots

UTA19

Feb 2, 2026 · Delta Center

Goal horn off

Situation:

VAN50.4%UTA49.6%

Includes power plays, overtime and empty-net play. Chance share is not win probability.

Even-Strength Edge

≈ roughly even

Unavailable in this filter.

Even-strength xG share is unavailable in this filter.

Special Teams Edge

VAN held a slight edge

VAN created 0.27 more power-play xG.

VAN

0.63xGUTA

0.36xG

01.252.5

Goaltending Edge

UTA above expected

UTA gained the goalie advantage.

VAN

-3.6GSAxUTA

+0.5GSAx

−40+4

Finishing Luck

UTA finished above expected

UTA are benefiting more from finishing luck.

VAN

-0.47G−xGUTA

+3.57G−xG

−40+4

Even-strength edge

≈ roughly even

Even-strength xG share is unavailable in this filter.

Special teams edge

VAN held a slight edge

VAN

0.63xGUTA

0.36xG

01.252.5

Goaltending edge

UTA above expected

VAN

-3.6GSAxUTA

+0.5GSAx

−40+4

Finishing luck

UTA finished above expected

VAN

-0.47G−xGUTA

+3.57G−xG

−40+4

All situations

VAN

UTA

Period:

Chances:

View:

Loading shot map...

Win probability

Team:

VAN

0.0% WP

100.0% WP

UTA

Scrub game time · 60:00

UTA 6-2 VAN

End of Game

60:00

5v5

VAN

0.0%

UTA

100.0%

Event impact

Unavailable for this event

WP reflects the current game state at 5v5.

Loading goaltenders…

Loading players…

Game flow pressure

Attacking pressure over time based on shots and chance quality.

VAN had the longest sustained stretch from 1:55 P2 to 0:20 P2, while VAN's best response came from 15:00 P3 to 13:50 P3.

UTA pressureVAN pressureGoalPower play

Scrub game time · 0:00 P3

0:00 P3UTA held a slight edge

UTA

Pressure

1.47

2 shots · 0.05 xG

VAN

Pressure

0.65

1 shot · 0.04 xG

High-danger chances: UTA 0 · VAN 0. Tap or drag across the chart, or use the time slider.

0.7xG1.4

1.7xG1.2

1.1xG0.8

VAN at UTA

Game ControlChance share: VAN 50.4%, UTA 49.6%Collapse

Shot qualityExplore shot locations and the quality of each scoring chance.Collapse

Game storyFollow win probability and attacking pressure as the game unfolds.Collapse

Win probability

Goaltender duelBoth starters on results, workload and the quality of shots they facedCollapse

PlayersTop game grade: John Marino (UTA), A+Collapse

LinesFive-on-five forward lines, defensive pairings, and matchupsExplore

Event timelineEvery goal, penalty and shot in orderExplore

Box scoreOfficial team, skater, and goalie stats.Explore

Game summary

Game flow pressure