Flames 4, Sharks 1 — Feb 26, 2026

CGYFlames

4–1

FINAL

SJSSharks

Shots29CGY

Shots35SJS

Model stars

1KadriCGYA+2KurashevSJSA+3ZaryCGYA+

Feb 26, 2026 · SAP Center at San Jose

Goal horn off

CGYFlames

4–1

FINAL P3

SJSSharks

Shots

CGY29

Model stars

1KadriCGYA+2KurashevSJSA+3ZaryCGYA+

Shots

SJS35

Feb 26, 2026 · SAP Center at San Jose

Goal horn off

Situation:

CGY53.8%SJS46.2%

Includes power plays, overtime and empty-net play. Chance share is not win probability.

Even-Strength Edge

≈ roughly even

Unavailable in this filter.

Even-strength xG share is unavailable in this filter.

Special Teams Edge

SJS had the edge

SJS created 1.02 more power-play xG.

CGY

0.41xGSJS

1.42xG

01.252.5

Goaltending Edge

CGY above expected

CGY gained the goalie advantage.

CGY

+2.1GSAxSJS

-0.3GSAx

−40+4

Finishing Luck

CGY finished above expected

CGY are benefiting more from finishing luck.

CGY

+0.34G−xGSJS

-2.15G−xG

−40+4

Even-strength edge

≈ roughly even

Even-strength xG share is unavailable in this filter.

Special teams edge

SJS had the edge

CGY

0.41xGSJS

1.42xG

01.252.5

Goaltending edge

CGY above expected

CGY

+2.1GSAxSJS

-0.3GSAx

−40+4

Finishing luck

CGY finished above expected

CGY

+0.34G−xGSJS

-2.15G−xG

−40+4

All situations

CGY

SJS

Period:

Chances:

View:

Loading shot map...

Win probability

Team:

CGY

100.0% WP

0.0% WP

SJS

Scrub game time · 60:00

SJS 1-4 CGY

End of Game

60:00

5v5

CGY

100.0%

SJS

0.0%

Event impact

Unavailable for this event

WP reflects the current game state at 5v5.

Loading goaltenders…

Loading players…

Game flow pressure

Attacking pressure over time based on shots and chance quality.

SJS had the longest sustained stretch from 0:55 P2 to 18:50 P3, while SJS's best response came from 1:00 P1 to 19:35 P2.

SJS pressureCGY pressureGoalPower play

Scrub game time · 0:00 P3

0:00 P3SJS held a slight edge

SJS

Pressure

1.59

2 shots · 0.20 xG

CGY

Pressure

0.00

0 shots · 0.00 xG

High-danger chances: SJS 0 · CGY 0. Tap or drag across the chart, or use the time slider.

0.8xG2.3

1.4xG2.9

2.2xG1.3

CGY at SJS

Game ControlChance share: CGY 53.8%, SJS 46.2%Collapse

Shot qualityExplore shot locations and the quality of each scoring chance.Collapse

Game storyFollow win probability and attacking pressure as the game unfolds.Collapse

Win probability

Goaltender duelBoth starters on results, workload and the quality of shots they facedCollapse

PlayersTop game grade: Nazem Kadri (CGY), A+Collapse

LinesFive-on-five forward lines, defensive pairings, and matchupsExplore

Event timelineEvery goal, penalty and shot in orderExplore

Box scoreOfficial team, skater, and goalie stats.Explore

Game summary

Game flow pressure