Includes power plays, overtime and empty-net play. Chance share is not win probability.
Even-Strength Edge
Unavailable in this filter.
Even-strength xG share is unavailable in this filter.
Special Teams Edge
Power-play chance quality was roughly even.
Goaltending Edge
UTA gained the goalie advantage.
Finishing Luck
UTA are benefiting more from finishing luck.
Even-strength edge
Even-strength xG share is unavailable in this filter.
Special teams edge
Goaltending edge
Finishing luck
All situations
Loading shot map...
PHI 0-3 UTA
End of Game
60:00
5v5UTA
100.0%
PHI
0.0%
Event impact
Unavailable for this event
WP reflects the current game state at 5v5.
Loading goaltenders…
Loading players…
Loading line combinations…
Analyst details
Open the play-by-play event timeline.
Loading official game summary…
UTA had the clearest sustained push from 2:30 P3 to 0:45 P3.
PHI
Pressure
0.84
2 shots · 0.17 xG
UTA
Pressure
1.38
2 shots · 0.25 xG
High-danger chances: PHI 0 · UTA 0. Tap or drag across the chart, or use the time slider.