Deryk Engelland

Team not recorded#5Defenseman Shoots right

Age 44 · 6′2″ · 212 lb · Edmonton, AB, CAN

No checked season results are available for this selection.

Games79T-171st in NHL

Goals50.06/GP▲0.01T-431st in NHL

Assists180.23/GP▲0.08T-268th in NHL

Points230.29/GP▲0.09T-341st in NHL…

5v5 xG share48.6%148th of 235…

Avg TOI20:1799th in NHL…

No checked season results are available for this selection.

No complete checked component breakdown is available for this selection.

Loading season standing and profile…

Season metrics

2017–18 · five-on-five · vs 235 positional peers

Player	Percentile	Rank
1.04		44 / 23582nd
0.23		79 / 23567th
—	—	—

Shooting & finishing	Player	Percentile	Rank
	0.16		151 / 23536th
	4.50		123 / 23548th
	9.23		141 / 23540th
	0.025		140 / 17621st
	0.06		43 / 17676th

Elite90+Strong70–89Average30–69Weak10–29Poor<10Bar length is the peer percentile, so longer is always better · tick at the 50th

How to read these comparisons

Player values are recorded season results. Peer averages are arithmetic means of qualified players in the selected group; each row uses the same peers for its average and rank. Ranks use unrounded values, with tied players sharing a rank and the next rank skipped. Lower xG against ranks better. Bar colours are the five performance tiers; context rows are blue and not graded. Differences from the average describe the season, not isolated player impact.

Goals above expected is the raw goals-minus-xG rate, without the shrinkage used in the older finishing comparison. On-ice measures include teammates, opponents and deployment. These recorded metrics describe different quantities from the adjusted Season score components beside them.

Skaters need 20 appearances and 300 five-on-five minutes; quality and finishing also need 75 unblocked attempts. Early in a season these minimums scale down with games played so far. At least 30 peers must qualify. Playoff ranks are withheld. A reviewed axis whose own evidence fails is withheld and shown with its reason rather than ranked. These workload rules do not express statistical confidence.

Position uses the NHL listed primary position available now; it does not establish historical position or actual deployment. Broad groups are forwards, defence and goalies. This version uses the current model’s covered games only.

Season vs reference

Reference

Per game · all situations

Metric2017–18ReferenceDiff

0.060.05+0.01

0.230.15+0.08

0.290.20+0.09

1.371.32+0.05

Reference: 2016–17 · 81 games.

Season comparisons

Loading peer comparisons and model evidence…

Optional recent-history profile

Rolling Radar

Recent NHL history, carried across seasons. The radar compares this broader profile with a fixed position-group reference.

Rolling profile is currently unavailable.

Rolling Radar

Loading recent-history profile…

Results vs expected

Five-on-five · what happened beside the chances created and allowed

Chances	Player	Percentile	Rank
	2.58		98 / 23559th
	2.73		177 / 23525th
	48.6		148 / 23537th

Player	Percentile	Rank
—	—	—
—	—	—
—	—	—

Player	Percentile	Rank
—	—	—
—	—	—
—	—	—

Context · not graded

5v5 goals: —
5v5 expected: 57.4–60.7
EPV added: +2.88

On ice vs off ice

Vegas's share with Deryk Engelland on the ice against the same team without him.

Share	On ice and off ice	On-minus-off gap in percentage points
xGF%	On ice 48.6% · Off ice unavailable	—
CF%	On ice 48.3% · Off ice unavailable	—
GF%	On ice unavailable · Off ice unavailable	—

On iceOff ice

Scale 40–65% · marker at 50% · right column is the on-minus-off gap in points

Loading model evidence…

Defensive metrics

Five-on-five on-ice suppression; individual events in all situations.

Player	Percentile	Rank
60.00		176 / 23525th
—	—	—
0.061		162 / 23531st

Player	Percentile	Rank
—	—	—
—	—	—
—	—	—

Physical style	Player	Percentile	Rank
	—	—	—
	—	—	—

Context · not graded

Evidence coverage: high danger 24 of 79 games.

Discipline & puck management

Recorded season event counts · all situations

Penaltiesnet —

Taken —Drawn —

Puck eventsnet —

Giveaways —Takeaways —

Blocks: —
Hits: —

Both penalty counts cover 27 of 79 games with every drawn role recorded.

Loading defensive evidence…

SituationChancesViewShot type

Shot map

All 156 attempts

Goal5Shot on goal103Missed shot48Blocked shot0Larger dot = higher xG

Shooting by zone

Hover a row to light it up · click to pin

Zone	Att	G	xG	Goal rate	Exp.	G−xG
Point	103	4	1.6	3.9%	1.6%	+2.4
Below goal line	2	1	0.1	50.0%	3.2%	+0.9
Left circle	2	0	0.0	0.0%	1.1%	0.0
Outer slot	4	0	0.2	0.0%	4.1%	−0.2
Right circle	21	0	0.4	0.0%	2.0%	−0.4
Inner slot	4	0	0.5	0.0%	12.9%	−0.5
High slot	20	0	1.4	0.0%	7.1%	−1.4
All zones	156	5	4.2	3.2%	2.7%	+0.8

Finishing evidence. Scoring 3.2% on chances vs 2.7% expected (+0.5 points), led by point volume and slap finishing.

Sorted by goals minus expected goals. Goal rate is goals per unblocked attempt against the expected rate.

Shot profile

Context · not graded

On-net rate: 69.2%
Slot share: 15.4%
Average distance: 47.0 ft
Rebound attempts / 60: 0.15

Shot types

156 attempts

Type	Share	Sh%	G−xG
Wrist	66.0%	4.3%	+0.8
Slap	22.4%	8.3%	+0.9
Snap	7.7%	0.0%	−0.3
Backhand	2.6%	0.0%	−0.3
Deflected	1.3%	—	−0.2

Share is context, not a grade. Sh% counts shots on goal only.

High-danger chances

Model goal probability ≥ 0.20

Conversion0.0%−22.4 pts vs expected

Actual0.0%

Expected22.4%

Attempts: 1
Goals: 0
Expected goals: 0.2
G−xG: −0.2

Shot locations

Loading canonical shot events…

Usage by situation

Ice time, share of team ice time, scoring and scoring rate, with where shifts start.

Scope	TOI/GP	Team share	G	A	P	P/60	Rank (D)
Five-on-five	16:52	—	5	18	23	1.04	44 / 235
Power play	0:05	—	0	0	0	0.00	—
Penalty kill	2:58	—	0	0	0	0.00	52 / 120
Other	0:22	—	0	0	0	0.00	166 / 235
All situations	20:17	—	5	18	23	0.86	118 / 235

Where the 23 points come from · All situations

Goals5 · 0.19/60
Primary assists— · —/60
Secondary assists— · —/60

Zone starts — offensive of OZ + DZ

Offensive —Neutral —Defensive —

Shifts

— a game · — average

Zone starts: five-on-five · Shifts: all situations

Usage by situation

Loading usage…

Power play

6:06 recorded ice time · peers need 100 minutes

Share of team PP: —
PP points: 0
Unit xGF / 60: 4.70

Player	Percentile	Rank
0.00		—
—	—	—
0.00		—
0.00		—
4.70		—
—	—	—

No rank yet

Evidence coverage: goals 3 of 21 games · team time 27 of 79 games.

Penalty kill

233:43 recorded ice time · peers need 100 minutes

Share of team PK: —
SH points: 0
Unit xGA / 60: 6.92

Player	Percentile	Rank
6.92		65 / 12046th
—	—	—
102.95		54 / 12055th
—	—	—
0.85		76 / 12037th

Evidence coverage: goals 17 of 75 games · high danger 16 of 75 games · team time 27 of 79 games.

Loading special teams…

Split	GP	G	A	P	P/GP	5v5 xG share	Team record
Venue
Home	40	2	14	16	0.40	49.3%	28–10–2
Away	39	3	4	7	0.18	47.8%	22–13–4
Rest
Back-to-back	11	0	3	3	0.27	52.7%	6–4–1
1 day of rest	41	3	11	14	0.34	44.8%	28–11–2
2+ days of rest	26	2	4	6	0.23	53.2%	15–8–3
Opponent
vs Eastern	32	4	9	13	0.41	47.4%	18–11–3
vs Western	47	1	9	10	0.21	49.4%	32–12–3
vs playoff teams	37	2	10	12	0.32	46.3%	23–11–3
vs non-playoff teams	42	3	8	11	0.26	50.5%	27–12–3
Recent
Last 10	10	0	1	1	0.10	46.4%	5–4–1

Split	G	A	P	5v5 xG share	5v5 CF%	5v5 GF–GA
Period
1st period	1	12	13	—	—	—
2nd period	2	6	8	—	—	—
3rd period	2	0	2	—	—	—
Overtime	0	0	0	—	—	—
Score state · 5v5 on ice
Leading	—	—	—	47.8%	45.4%	22–23
Tied	—	—	—	50.7%	50.0%	19–21
Trailing	—	—	—	43.7%	49.0%	10–12

Teammate	Pos	TOI together	xG share together	GF–GA	CF%	Him without	Teammate without
Shea Theodore	D	791:12	47.1%	29–39	48.8%	48.8%	53.6%
William Karlsson	C	385:13	47.4%	10–16	48.6%	47.9%	56.7%
Erik Haula	L	356:10	47.3%	19–15	46.2%	48.0%	53.8%
Jonathan Marchessault	C	351:40	45.8%	10–16	46.7%	48.5%	55.5%
David Perron	L	344:34	46.1%	17–15	45.5%	48.4%	53.2%
James Neal	L	331:19	49.6%	15–14	49.2%	47.2%	53.9%
Cody Eakin	C	304:38	46.5%	14–12	49.3%	48.1%	47.9%
Reilly Smith	R	303:07	47.6%	10–14	47.8%	47.8%	55.4%
Alex Tuch	R	298:01	49.0%	12–12	49.9%	47.5%	51.7%
Brayden McNabb	D	254:18	56.2%	10–10	49.6%	46.0%	54.5%
Pierre-Edouard Bellemare	L	244:37	51.1%	7–10	49.7%	47.0%	52.8%
Oscar Lindberg	L	220:49	53.1%	10–6	51.7%	46.7%	52.5%

	Opponent	Result		A		PPP	+/−	SOG		5v5 on-ice xG share	Game
Jun 7	vs WSH	L 3–4	17:46	0	0	0	-1	2	0.10	26.9%	View →
Jun 4	@ WSH	L 2–6	16:58	0	0	—	-1	2	0.02	65.4%	View →
Jun 2	@ WSH	L 1–3	20:29	0	0	0	0	3	0.02	39.2%	View →
May 30	vs WSH	L 2–3	18:01	0	0	—	-1	3	0.03	42.5%	View →
May 28	vs WSH	W 6–4	20:50	2	2	0	2	5	0.05	61.2%	View →
May 20	@ WPG	W 2–1	23:20	0	0	—	1	1	0.00	61.2%	View →
May 18	vs WPG	W 3–2	21:02	0	0	—	0	1	0.02	39.1%	View →
May 16	vs WPG	W 4–2	19:25	0	0	0	1	0	0.00	67.4%	View →
May 14	@ WPG	W 3–1	21:17	0	0	—	1	0	0.03	27.3%	View →
May 12	@ WPG	L 2–4	18:36	0	0	—	-2	1	0.10	59.5%	View →
Filtered 10	—	5–5	19:46 avg	2	2	—	0	18	0.37	50.3%	—

Season	GP	A	P	SOG	P/GP	5v5 ixG/60	5v5 GP
2018–19	7	1	1	7	0.14	0.12	7
2017–18	20	2	2	30	0.10	0.16	20
2016–17	4	0	0	2	0.00	0.05	4

	Opponent	Result		A		PPP	+/−	SOG		5v5 on-ice xG share	Game
Apr 7	@ CGY	L 1–7	20:53	0	0	—	-1	1	0.22	50.5%	View →
Apr 5	@ EDM	L 3–4	18:42	0	0	0	-2	0	0.00	34.0%	View →
Apr 3	@ VAN	W 5–4 SO	22:29	0	0	—	0	0	0.00	51.6%	View →
Mar 31	vs SJS	W 3–2	21:05	1	1	—	2	1	0.04	49.2%	View →
Mar 30	vs STL	W 4–3 OT	22:35	0	0	0	0	1	0.05	61.1%	View →
Mar 28	vs ARI	L 2–3	19:20	0	0	—	-1	2	0.03	42.8%	View →
Mar 22	@ SJS	OTL 1–2 OT	23:38	0	0	—	1	1	0.05	58.6%	View →
Mar 20	vs VAN	W 4–1	21:41	0	0	—	2	2	0.03	47.8%	View →
Mar 18	vs CGY	W 4–0	20:36	0	0	—	0	0	0.00	19.4%	View →
Mar 16	vs MIN	L 2–4	20:13	0	0	0	0	2	0.04	43.2%	View →
Filtered 10	—	5–4–1	21:07 avg	1	1	—	1	10	0.45	46.4%	—

Season	Box score · all situations	5v5 individual	5v5 on ice	Season performance
2019–20	37	VGK	49	1	5	6	6	37	59	1.7	17:33	—	—	0.35	0.12	4.38	0.020	2.61	2.38	52.3	50.2	—	—	—	—
2018–19	36	VGK	74	2	10	12	-3	18	105	1.9	19:53	—	—	0.45	0.15	4.50	0.023	2.66	2.64	50.2	50.4	—	—	—	—
2017–18	35	VGK	79	5	18	23	6	24	108	4.6	20:17	—	—	1.04	0.16	4.50	0.025	2.58	2.73	48.6	48.3	—	—	—	—
2016–17	34	CGY	81	4	12	16	2	85	107	3.7	18:20	—	—	0.80	0.16	5.04	0.025	1.89	2.35	44.6	46.6	—	—	—	—
2015–16	33	CGY	69	3	9	12	7	54	71	4.2	15:14	—	—	0.70	0.15	4.43	0.025	2.11	2.38	47.1	45.3	—	—	—	—
Career	—	5 seasons	352	15	54	69	18	218	450	3.3	18:23	—	—	0.70	0.15	4.59	0.024	2.37	2.52	48.4	48.2	—	—	—	—

1 award records

Mark Messier NHL Leadership Award · 2017–18

Every metric name opens its definition; the full list lives in Metrics.

Traditional statistics cover all situations. Supporting five-on-five analyses use completed games, raw adjustment and exposure from xG model v4. The two samples can differ.

An em dash means unavailable, not zero. A partial season remains partial. Where a panel reports evidence coverage, its rates use only the covered games. History never substitutes a different model, and a missing appearance interrupts a rolling model window.

Shot maps use the same shot model as Game Center and show which model version scored recent shots beside the rink. Older seasons can use earlier model versions. High danger means a model scoring probability of at least 0.20 on an unblocked attempt; for goalies, medium danger is 0.08 to 0.20 and low is below 0.08.

Special-team buckets include the wider recorded man-advantage and man-down states, read from the player’s own team; for a goalie, penalty kill means facing a power play. Their ranks need 100 recorded minutes and at least 30 qualified peers; below 100 minutes, penalty-kill percentiles are provisional. Playoff values have no ranks or percentiles. Team share is player ice time divided by team ice time in that situation, over the games the player dressed. Zone starts describe faceoff-started five-on-five shifts and exclude on-the-fly starts.

Penalties count events, including one for a double minor; bench and served-by roles are excluded, and victimless infractions have no drawn role. EPV added sums changes in the probability that the possessing team scores next; it is not standings points or an isolated player grade. Rolling windows never cross seasons or season types, and a missed game is not a zero-performance appearance. Career rates use summed counts and exposure, never an average of season rates; a missing contributing season withholds its career metric, and Performance begins in 2023–24.

Explore the full methodology →

Season			Box score · all situations												5v5 individual				5v5 on ice					Season performance
Season	Age	Team	GP	G	A	P	+/−	PIM	SOG	Sh%	PPG	TOI/GP	Hits	Blk	P/60	ixG/60	SOG/60	xG/UA	xGF/60	xGA/60	xGF%	CF%	GF%	Perf/60	Grade	Rank
2019–20	37	VGK	49	1	5	6	6	37	59	1.7	0	17:33	—	—	0.35	0.12	4.38	0.020	2.61	2.38	52.3	50.2	—	—	—	—
2018–19	36	VGK	74	2	10	12	-3	18	105	1.9	0	19:53	—	—	0.45	0.15	4.50	0.023	2.66	2.64	50.2	50.4	—	—	—	—
2017–18	35	VGK	79	5	18	23	6	24	108	4.6	0	20:17	—	—	1.04	0.16	4.50	0.025	2.58	2.73	48.6	48.3	—	—	—	—
2016–17	34	CGY	81	4	12	16	2	85	107	3.7	0	18:20	—	—	0.80	0.16	5.04	0.025	1.89	2.35	44.6	46.6	—	—	—	—
2015–16	33	CGY	69	3	9	12	7	54	71	4.2	0	15:14	—	—	0.70	0.15	4.43	0.025	2.11	2.38	47.1	45.3	—	—	—	—
Career	—	5 seasons	352	15	54	69	18	218	450	3.3	0	18:23	—	—	0.70	0.15	4.59	0.024	2.37	2.52	48.4	48.2	—	—	—	—

Deryk Engelland

Season performanceSelected-season standing and the components behind the scoreCollapse

Season metrics

Season vs reference

Season comparisons

Rolling Radar

Rolling Radar

On-ice impact5v5Average 48.6% on-ice expected goal share at five-on-five (148th of 235)What the team creates and allows during the player’s five-on-five minutesExplore

Results vs expected

On ice vs off ice

Defense5v5 · AllWeak 2.73 on-ice expected goals against per 60 (177th of 235)On-ice suppression and individual disciplineExplore

Defensive metrics

Discipline & puck management

Penaltiesnet —

Puck eventsnet —

Shooting & finishingAverage 0.16 individual expected goals per 60 (151st of 235)Where the player shoots, the quality of those chances, and actual versus expected goalsExplore

Shot map

Shooting by zone

Shot profile

Shot types

High-danger chances

Shot locations

Usage & deployment20:17 TOI per game (16:52 at five-on-five · 0:05 PP · 2:58 PK)Scoring by situation, zone starts and workloadExplore

Usage by situation

Where the 23 points come from · All situations

Zone starts — offensive of OZ + DZ

Shifts

Usage by situation

Special teamsPP · PK0.00 power-play points per 60Power play and penalty killExplore

Power play

Penalty kill

FormExplore

Rolling Radar

Splits0.40 points per game at home · 0.18 awayVenue, rest and opponentExplore

By period and score state

Linemates5v5Most often with Shea Theodore: 791 five-on-five minutes, 47.1% xG share togetherWho he plays with at five-on-fiveExplore

Playoffs20 playoff games: 0 goals, 2 points · 31 career playoff gamesExplore

2017–18 playoffs

Playoff games

Every playoff run

Game log79 games · most recent at CGY, L 1–7: 0 G, 0 AOfficial totals and five-on-five evidenceExplore

Career5 NHL seasons: 352 games, 69 pointsEvery season and a recomputed career lineExplore

Data notesScopes, missing values and model evidenceExplore

2017–18 playoffs

Playoff games

Every playoff run

Defensive metrics

Discipline & puck management

Penaltiesnet —

Puck eventsnet —

Power play

Penalty kill

Results vs expected

On ice vs off ice

Shot map

Shooting by zone

Shot profile

Shot types

High-danger chances

Usage by situation

Where the 23 points come from · All situations

Zone starts — offensive of OZ + DZ

Shifts

By period and score state

Season metrics

Season vs reference