Deryk Engelland

Team not recorded#5Defenseman Shoots right

Age 44 · 6′2″ · 212 lb · Edmonton, AB, CAN

No checked season results are available for this selection.

Games49T-478th in NHL

Goals10.02/GP▼0.01T-602nd in NHL

Assists50.10/GP▼0.03T-540th in NHL

Points60.12/GP▼0.04T-595th in NHL…

P / GP0.12▼0.04T-742nd in NHL…

Avg TOI17:33258th in NHL…

No checked season results are available for this selection.

No complete checked component breakdown is available for this selection.

Loading season standing and profile…

Season metrics

2019–20 · five-on-five · against qualified peers

Player	Percentile	Rank
0.35		211 / 223
0.09		174 / 223
—	—	—

Player	Percentile	Rank
0.12		190 / 223
4.38		121 / 223
8.93		131 / 223
0.020	—	—
-0.04	—	—

Above averageNear averageBelow averageBars and shaded cells show peer percentile, so more is always better · tick at the 50th

How to read these comparisons

Player values are recorded season results. Peer averages are arithmetic means of qualified players in the selected group; each row uses the same peers for its average and rank. Ranks use unrounded values, with tied players sharing a rank and the next rank skipped. Lower xG against ranks better. Green/red differences show favorable/unfavorable values versus average, not isolated player impact. Brass marks top-ten ranks.

Goals above expected is the raw goals-minus-xG rate, without the shrinkage used in the older finishing comparison. On-ice measures include teammates, opponents and deployment. These recorded metrics describe different quantities from the adjusted Season score components beside them.

Skaters need 20 appearances and 300 five-on-five minutes; quality and finishing also need 75 unblocked attempts. Early in a season these minimums scale down with games played so far. At least 30 peers must qualify. Playoff ranks are withheld. A reviewed axis whose own evidence fails is withheld and shown with its reason rather than ranked. These workload rules do not express statistical confidence.

Position uses the NHL listed primary position available now; it does not establish historical position or actual deployment. Broad groups are forwards, defence and goalies. This version uses the current model’s covered games only.

Season comparisons

Loading peer comparisons and model evidence…

Optional recent-history profile

Rolling Radar

Recent NHL history, carried across seasons. The radar compares this broader profile with a fixed position-group reference.

Rolling profile is currently unavailable.

Rolling Radar

Loading recent-history profile…

Results vs expected

Five-on-five · what happened beside the chances created and allowed

Player	Percentile	Rank
—	—	—
2.61		45 / 223
—	—	—
2.38		102 / 223
—	—	—
52.3		64 / 223
—	—	—
—	—	—
—	—	—

5v5 goals: —
5v5 expected: 29.8–27.2
EPV added: +1.17

On ice vs off ice

Vegas's share with Deryk Engelland on the ice against the same team without him.

Share	On ice and off ice	On-minus-off gap in percentage points
xGF%	On ice 52.3% · Off ice unavailable	—
CF%	On ice 50.2% · Off ice unavailable	—
GF%	On ice unavailable · Off ice unavailable	—

On iceOff ice

Scale 40–65% · marker at 50% · right column is the on-minus-off gap in points

Loading model evidence…

Defensive metrics

Five-on-five on-ice suppression; individual events in all situations.

Player	Percentile	Rank
55.50		148 / 223
—	—	—
0.060		120 / 223
—	—	—
—	—	—
—	—	—
—	—	—
—	—	—

Discipline & puck management

Recorded season event counts · all situations

Penaltiesnet —

Taken —Drawn —

Puck eventsnet —

Giveaways —Takeaways —

Blocks: —
Hits: —

Loading defensive evidence…

SituationChancesViewShot type

Goal1Shot on goal58Missed shot22Blocked shot0Larger dot = higher xG

Shooting by zone

Zone	Shots	xG	Goals	S%
Point	62	0.9	0	0.0%
Right circle	5	0.1	0	0.0%
Below goal line	4	0.1	0	0.0%
High slot	4	0.3	1	25.0%
Inner slot	3	0.3	0	0.0%
Outer slot	2	0.1	0	0.0%
Left circle	1	0.0	0	0.0%

Hover or focus a row to light up those attempts on the rink.

Finishing evidence. Scoring 1.2% on chances vs 2.2% expected (−0.9 points), with the largest shortfall in the point.

Shot types81 attempts

Wrist65%
Slap19%
Snap15%
Wrap-around1%

High-danger chances

Expected: 0.5
Goals: 0
Conversion: 0.0%

7 high-danger attempts · Model is the expected conversion on those attempts.

Shot locations

Loading canonical shot events…

Ice time, share of team ice time, scoring and scoring rate, with where shifts start.

Scope	TOI/GP	Team share	G	A	P	P/60	Rank (D)
Five-on-five	13:59	—	1	3	4	0.35	211 / 223
Power play	0:01	—	0	0	0	0.00	—
Penalty kill	3:25	—	0	1	1	0.36	50 / 104
Other	0:08	—	0	1	1	9.63	3 / 223
All situations	17:33	—	1	5	6	0.42	207 / 223

Where the 6 points come from · All situations

Goals1 · 0.07/60
Primary assists— · —/60
Secondary assists— · —/60

Zone starts — offensive of OZ + DZ

Offensive —Neutral —Defensive —

Shifts

— a game · — average

Zone starts: five-on-five · Shifts: all situations

Loading usage…

Power play

0:56 recorded ice time · peers need 100 minutes

Share of team PP: —
PP points: 0
Unit xGF / 60: 3.08

Player	Percentile	Rank
0.00	—	—
—	—	—
64.29	—	—
3.08	—	—
3.08	—	—
—	—	—

Penalty kill

167:39 recorded ice time · peers need 100 minutes

Share of team PK: —
SH points: 1
Unit xGA / 60: 6.66

Player	Percentile	Rank
6.66		70 / 104
—	—	—
112.02		102 / 104
—	—	—
1.35		41 / 104

Loading special teams…

Season	GP	A	P	SOG	P/GP	5v5 ixG/60	5v5 GP
2018–19	7	1	1	7	0.14	0.12	7
2017–18	20	2	2	30	0.10	0.20	20
2016–17	4	0	0	2	0.00	0.05	4

	Opponent	Result		PPP	+/−	SOG		5v5 on-ice xG share	Game
Feb 13	vs STL	W 6–5 OT	13:34	—	-2	0	0.00	46.7%	View →
Jan 31	@ CAR	W 4–3	15:35	—	-2	1	0.01	42.4%	View →
Jan 21	@ BOS	L 2–3	16:01	—	0	1	0.00	57.3%	View →
Jan 18	@ MTL	L 4–5 SO	13:19	0	0	0	0.02	48.6%	View →
Jan 16	@ OTT	W 4–2	17:09	—	0	5	0.16	43.4%	View →
Jan 14	@ BUF	L 2–4	15:47	—	0	1	0.01	80.0%	View →
Jan 11	vs CBJ	L 0–3	13:30	—	0	0	0.01	27.1%	View →
Jan 9	vs LAK	L 2–5	14:22	—	1	2	0.17	75.1%	View →
Jan 7	vs PIT	L 3–4	14:24	—	0	1	0.03	41.6%	View →
Jan 4	vs STL	W 5–4 OT	14:26	—	2	0	0.01	76.7%	View →
Filtered 10	—	4 W · 6 L	14:49 avg	—	-1	11	0.43	58.4%	—

Season	Box score · all situations	5v5 individual	5v5 on ice	Season performance
2019–20	37	VGK	49	1	5	6	6	37	59	1.7	17:33	—	—	0.35	0.12	4.38	0.020	2.61	2.38	52.3	50.2	—	—	—	—
2018–19	36	VGK	74	2	10	12	-3	18	105	1.9	19:53	165	—	0.45	0.15	4.50	0.023	2.66	2.64	50.2	50.4	—	—	—	—
2017–18	35	VGK	79	5	18	23	6	24	108	4.6	20:17	126	—	1.04	0.16	4.50	0.025	2.58	2.73	48.6	48.3	—	—	—	—
2016–17	34	CGY	81	4	12	16	2	85	107	3.7	18:20	135	—	0.80	0.16	5.04	0.025	1.89	2.35	44.6	46.6	—	—	—	—
2015–16	33	CGY	69	3	9	12	7	54	71	4.2	15:14	105	—	0.70	0.15	4.43	0.025	2.11	2.38	47.1	45.3	—	—	—	—
Career	—	5 seasons	352	15	54	69	18	218	450	3.3	18:23	—	—	0.70	0.15	4.59	0.024	2.37	2.52	48.4	48.2	—	—	—	—

1 award records

Mark Messier NHL Leadership Award · 2017–18

Every metric name opens its definition; the full list lives in Metrics.

Traditional statistics cover all situations. Supporting five-on-five analyses use completed games, raw adjustment and exposure from xG model v4. The two samples can differ.

An em dash means unavailable, not zero. A partial season remains partial. Where a panel reports evidence coverage, its rates use only the covered games. History never substitutes a different model, and a missing appearance interrupts a rolling model window.

Shot maps use the same shot model as Game Center and show which model version scored recent shots beside the rink. Older seasons can use earlier model versions. High danger means a model scoring probability of at least 0.20 on an unblocked attempt; for goalies, medium danger is 0.08 to 0.20 and low is below 0.08.

Special-team buckets include the wider recorded man-advantage and man-down states, read from the player’s own team; for a goalie, penalty kill means facing a power play. Their ranks need 100 recorded minutes and at least 30 qualified peers; below 100 minutes, penalty-kill percentiles are provisional. Playoff values have no ranks or percentiles. Team share is player ice time divided by team ice time in that situation, over the games the player dressed. Zone starts describe faceoff-started five-on-five shifts and exclude on-the-fly starts.

Penalties count events, including one for a double minor; bench and served-by roles are excluded, and victimless infractions have no drawn role. EPV added sums changes in the probability that the possessing team scores next; it is not standings points or an isolated player grade. Rolling windows never cross seasons or season types, and a missed game is not a zero-performance appearance. Career rates use summed counts and exposure, never an average of season rates; a missing contributing season withholds its career metric, and Performance begins in 2023–24.

Explore the full methodology →

Season			Box score · all situations												5v5 individual				5v5 on ice					Season performance
Season	Age	Team	GP	G	A	P	+/−	PIM	SOG	Sh%	PPG	TOI/GP	Hits	Blk	P/60	ixG/60	SOG/60	xG/UA	xGF/60	xGA/60	xGF%	CF%	GF%	Perf/60	Grade	Rank
2019–20	37	VGK	49	1	5	6	6	37	59	1.7	0	17:33	—	—	0.35	0.12	4.38	0.020	2.61	2.38	52.3	50.2	—	—	—	—
2018–19	36	VGK	74	2	10	12	-3	18	105	1.9	0	19:53	165	—	0.45	0.15	4.50	0.023	2.66	2.64	50.2	50.4	—	—	—	—
2017–18	35	VGK	79	5	18	23	6	24	108	4.6	0	20:17	126	—	1.04	0.16	4.50	0.025	2.58	2.73	48.6	48.3	—	—	—	—
2016–17	34	CGY	81	4	12	16	2	85	107	3.7	0	18:20	135	—	0.80	0.16	5.04	0.025	1.89	2.35	44.6	46.6	—	—	—	—
2015–16	33	CGY	69	3	9	12	7	54	71	4.2	0	15:14	105	—	0.70	0.15	4.43	0.025	2.11	2.38	47.1	45.3	—	—	—	—
Career	—	5 seasons	352	15	54	69	18	218	450	3.3	0	18:23	—	—	0.70	0.15	4.59	0.024	2.37	2.52	48.4	48.2	—	—	—	—

Deryk Engelland

Season performanceSelected-season standing and the components behind the scoreCollapse

Season metrics

Season comparisons

Rolling Radar

Rolling Radar

On-ice impactVery good: 52.3% on-ice expected goal share at five-on-five (64th of 223)What the team creates and allows during the player’s five-on-five minutesExplore

Results vs expected

On ice vs off ice

DefenseSlightly above average: 2.38 on-ice expected goals against per 60 (102nd of 223)On-ice suppression and individual disciplineExplore

Defensive metrics

Discipline & puck management

Penaltiesnet —

Puck eventsnet —

Shooting & finishingPoor: 0.12 individual expected goals per 60 (190th of 223)Where the player shoots, the quality of those chances, and actual versus expected goalsExplore

Shooting by zone

Shot types81 attempts

High-danger chances

Shot locations

Usage & deployment17:33 TOI per game (13:59 at five-on-five · 0:01 PP · 3:25 PK)Scoring by situation, zone starts and workloadExplore

Where the 6 points come from · All situations

Zone starts — offensive of OZ + DZ

Shifts

Special teams0.00 power-play points per 60Power play and penalty killExplore

Power play

Penalty kill

Form0 points over the last 10 gamesRecent scoring and chance generationExplore

Rolling Radar

Shooting by zone

Shot types81 attempts

High-danger chances

Recent form

Recent form

Season vs reference

Season vs reference

PlayoffsDid not play in these playoffs · 31 career playoff gamesExplore

2019–20 playoffs

Every playoff run

Game log49 games · most recent vs STL, W 6–5: 0 G, 0 AOfficial totals and five-on-five evidenceExplore

Career5 NHL seasons: 352 games, 69 pointsEvery season and a recomputed career lineExplore

Data notesScopes, missing values and model evidenceExplore

2019–20 playoffs

Every playoff run

Defensive metrics

Discipline & puck management

Penaltiesnet —

Puck eventsnet —

Power play

Penalty kill

Results vs expected

On ice vs off ice

Where the 6 points come from · All situations

Zone starts — offensive of OZ + DZ

Shifts

Season metrics

Recent form

Season vs reference