Jeff Carter

Team not recorded#77Center Shoots right

Age 41 · 6′3″ · 219 lb · London, ON, CAN

Season grade: Withheld; Incomplete data; Performance / 60−0.2831/72 GP

Games72T-340th in NHL

Goals110.15/GP▼0.01T-264th in NHL

Assists40.06/GP▼0.15T-625th in NHL

Points150.21/GP▼0.16T-470th in NHL…

5v5 xG share42.0%186th of 209…

Avg TOI12:34T-633rd in NHL…

Career awards

Not qualified · 2023–24 forwards

Needs 78.1 more rated minutes. The app has checked scoring results for 31 of 72 appearances (43.1%); season standings require at least 90%. Scoring data cover less than 90% of recorded workload or could not be verified.

Percentiles appear once this player qualifies for season standings. The score breakdown is under How this is calculated.

How this is calculated

Score breakdown

Component	Weight	Scaled	Contribution
Offense	25%	−0.457	−0.114
Defense	25%	−0.208	−0.052
Chance creation	20%	−0.209	−0.042
Finishing	10%	0.151	+0.015
Assisting	20%	−0.417	−0.083
Performance rate			−0.277

Per 60 rated minutes, over the scored appearances. Each component is scaled separately, then weighted; the contributions add to the performance rate at full precision, so rounded figures may differ.

Scoring

Season grade is the qualified peer percentile on the same letter bands as Game Grade — A+ ≥88, A ≥78, A− ≥68, B+ ≥58, B ≥50, B− ≥42, C+ ≥35, C ≥28, C− ≥22, D ≥15, F below 15 — and needs qualification plus at least 30 eligible peers. The letter describes this season’s performance, not permanent ability.

Comparisons

Rank and component percentiles compare this season’s qualified forwards on unrounded rates over every checked appearance; Game Grade compares one appearance with frozen historical games.

Component percentiles are never averaged into the score. Recent history is optional, from up to three completed prior seasons; small samples are provisional.

Coverage

Qualification: 29 covered appearances, 492.0 rated minutes, and 90% appearance and workload coverage. Minimums advance with league progress; valid low-sample results stay visible.

Rated minutes exclude play with a goalie pulled: 10.1 min excluded; official TOI 424.0 min.

Coverage: partial. Updated Oct 20, 2026.

Method

Five weighted components add to the performance rate. Five-on-five offense and defense account for recorded teammates, opponents and game state, so shared on-ice results are not isolated individual ability. Finishing is scored against the shot model’s historical-shooter expectation and assisting counts primary assists plus half of secondary assists; both use the strength baseline, chance creation its positional baseline.

Legacy rating

Legacy season score: 11.9 / 100. The fixed exposure baseline is 50; this is separate from the season peer grade.

Loading season standing and profile…

Season metrics

2023–24 · five-on-five · vs 209 positional peers

Player	Percentile	Rank
0.72		197 / 2096th
0.45		156 / 20925th
—	—	—

Shooting & finishing	Player	Percentile	Rank
	0.55		157 / 20925th
	5.78		130 / 20938th
	10.92		129 / 20938th
	0.064		136 / 16920th
	-0.10		103 / 16939th

Elite90+Strong70–89Average30–69Weak10–29Poor<10Bar length is the peer percentile, so longer is always better · tick at the 50th

How to read these comparisons

Player values are recorded season results. Peer averages are arithmetic means of qualified players in the selected group; each row uses the same peers for its average and rank. Ranks use unrounded values, with tied players sharing a rank and the next rank skipped. Lower xG against ranks better. Bar colours are the five performance tiers; context rows are blue and not graded. Differences from the average describe the season, not isolated player impact.

Goals above expected is the raw goals-minus-xG rate, without the shrinkage used in the older finishing comparison. On-ice measures include teammates, opponents and deployment. These recorded metrics describe different quantities from the adjusted Season score components beside them.

Skaters need 20 appearances and 300 five-on-five minutes; quality and finishing also need 75 unblocked attempts. Early in a season these minimums scale down with games played so far. At least 30 peers must qualify. Playoff ranks are withheld. A reviewed axis whose own evidence fails is withheld and shown with its reason rather than ranked. These workload rules do not express statistical confidence.

Position uses the NHL listed primary position available now; it does not establish historical position or actual deployment. Broad groups are forwards, defence and goalies. This version uses the current model’s covered games only.

Season vs reference

Reference

Per game · all situations

Metric2023–24ReferenceDiff

0.150.16-0.01

0.060.20-0.15

0.210.37-0.16

1.251.76-0.51

Reference: 2022–23 · 79 games.

Season comparisons

Loading peer comparisons and model evidence…

Optional recent-history profile

Rolling Radar

Recent NHL history, carried across seasons. The radar compares this broader profile with a fixed position-group reference.

PlayerPeer average

Bands show position percentiles; axis labels show current rolling values.

Dashed outline: peer average in the fixed reference. Outside = above average; inside = below average. All axes point outward for stronger results.

Selected metric distribution

Player value: 2.05
Peer range: 1.68 – 4.20 xGF/60

Lower Higher (better)

Player 2.05 · mean 2.54. Higher raw values rank higher.

Rolling profile against a fixed reference group

Fixed rolling-profile reference · 430 players. Values use the same history and smoothing as the radar.

History, sample sizes & calculation

Higher radar percentiles mean stronger recorded results against the fixed reference, including older seasons. These are separate from this season’s league percentile. Each player has a different amount of covered history. Weighted minutes and attempts give recent games more influence. “Prior” is the share contributed by a frozen league baseline: it is higher when a player has less evidence, and differs by metric because each uses its own smoothing strength. It is not a confidence score.

On-ice offense · xGF/60: 565.3 weighted minutes · 26% prior
On-ice defense · xGA/60: 565.3 weighted minutes · 41% prior
Chance generation · ixG/60: 565.3 weighted minutes · 26% prior
Shot quality · ixG/attempt: 80.6 weighted attempts · 24% prior
Finishing · goals above expected/60: 80.6 weighted attempts · 33% prior

History through Apr 17, 2024. Recent games count more than older games. History carries across seasons and stays unchanged while inactive. On-ice results are shared; finishing describes results rather than established talent.

Rolling Radar

Loading recent-history profile…

Results vs expected

Five-on-five · what happened beside the chances created and allowed

Chances	Player	Percentile	Rank
	1.89		185 / 20912th
	2.61		119 / 20943rd
	42.0		186 / 20911th

Player	Percentile	Rank
—	—	—
—	—	—
—	—	—

Player	Percentile	Rank
—	—	—
—	—	—
—	—	—

Context · not graded

5v5 goals: —
5v5 expected: 21.0–28.9
EPV added: +2.22

On ice vs off ice

Pittsburgh's share with Jeff Carter on the ice against the same team without him.

Share	On ice and off ice	On-minus-off gap in percentage points
xGF%	On ice 42.0% · Off ice unavailable	—
CF%	On ice 44.1% · Off ice unavailable	—
GF%	On ice unavailable · Off ice unavailable	—

On iceOff ice

Scale 40–65% · marker at 50% · right column is the on-minus-off gap in points

Loading model evidence…

Defensive metrics

Five-on-five on-ice suppression; individual events in all situations.

Player	Percentile	Rank
64.20		175 / 20916th
—	—	—
0.058		66 / 20969th

Player	Percentile	Rank
—	—	—
—	—	—
—	—	—

Physical style	Player	Percentile	Rank
	—	—	—
	—	—	—

Context · not graded

Discipline & puck management

Recorded season event counts · all situations

Penaltiesnet —

Taken —Drawn —

Puck eventsnet —

Giveaways —Takeaways —

Blocks: —
Hits: —

Loading defensive evidence…

SituationChancesViewShot type

Goal11Shot on goal80Missed shot44Blocked shot0Larger dot = higher xG

Shooting by zone

Zone	Att	G	xG	Goal rate / exp.	G−xG
Outer slot	10	2	0.7	20.0% / 6.8%	+1.3
Inner slot	45	7	6.9	15.6% / 15.4%	+0.1
Below goal line	2	0	0.0	0.0% / 2.5%	0.0
Left circle	7	0	0.1	0.0% / 1.3%	−0.1
Point	22	0	0.3	0.0% / 1.3%	−0.3
High slot	29	2	2.4	6.9% / 8.4%	−0.4
Right circle	20	0	0.6	0.0% / 2.8%	−0.6
All zones	135	11	11.0	8.1% / 8.2%	0.0

Sorted by goals minus expected goals. Goal rate is goals per unblocked attempt against the expected rate. Hover a row to light up those attempts on the rink.

Finishing evidence. Scoring 8.1% on chances against 8.2% expected, tracking the model across 7 zones.

Shot types135 attempts

Type	Share	Sh%	G−xG
Wrist	58.5%	12.5%	+0.6
Tip-in	20.0%	15.4%	−0.7
Backhand	8.9%	10.0%	+0.6
Snap	5.9%	0.0%	−0.8
Deflected	3.7%	33.3%	+0.4
Slap	1.5%	0.0%	−0.1
Other	1.5%	—	−0.1

Share is context, not a grade. Sh% counts shots on goal only.

High-danger chancesmodel probability ≥ 0.20

Attempts5.9% of the selected attempts: 8
Goals: 3
Expected goals: 2.7
Conversion: 37.5%33.4% expected

Shot profilecontext · not graded

On-net rate91 of 135 attempts on goal: 67.4%
Slot share74 of 135 from the inner or high slot: 54.8%
Average distancefrom the centre of the net: 27.8 ft
Rebound attempts / 607 this season · all situations: 0.46

Shot locations

Loading canonical shot events…

Usage by situation

Ice time, share of team ice time, scoring and scoring rate, with where shifts start.

Scope	TOI/GP	Team share	G	A	P	P/60
Five-on-five	9:14	—	5	3	8	0.72
Power play	1:40	—	4	0	4	1.99
Penalty kill	1:26	—	2	0	2	1.16
Other	0:14	—	0	1	1	3.56
All situations	12:34	—	11	4	15	0.99

Where the 15 points come from · All situations

Goals11 · 0.73/60
Primary assists— · —/60
Secondary assists— · —/60

Zone starts — offensive of OZ + DZ

Offensive —Neutral —Defensive —

Shifts

— a game · — average

Zone starts: five-on-five · Shifts: all situations

Faceoffs

All situations · zones are read from his side of the draw · values only; no peer ranks yet

Win %: 62.5%
Draws per game: 5.89
Offensive zone: 61.3%
Defensive zone: 62.5%
Power play: 68.3%

Usage by situation

Loading usage…

Power play

120:22 recorded ice time · peers need 100 minutes

Share of team PP: —
PP points: 4
Unit xGF / 60: 6.19

Player	Percentile	Rank
1.99		100 / 1066th
—	—	—
9.97		73 / 10631st
2.01		47 / 10656th
6.19		97 / 1069th
—	—	—

Penalty kill

103:19 recorded ice time · peers need 100 minutes

Share of team PK: —
SH points: 2
Unit xGA / 60: 9.86

Player	Percentile	Rank
9.86		65 / 7716th
—	—	—
120.79		59 / 7724th
—	—	—
0.79		59 / 7724th

Loading special teams…

Split	GP	G	A	P	P/GP	5v5 xG share	Team record
Venue
Home	38	7	2	9	0.24	42.2%	21–13–4
Away	34	4	2	6	0.18	41.8%	12–15–7
Rest
Back-to-back	11	0	1	1	0.09	36.1%	8–3–0
1 day of rest	37	6	3	9	0.24	46.5%	14–15–8
2+ days of rest	23	5	0	5	0.22	37.7%	11–9–3
Opponent
vs Eastern	44	5	4	9	0.20	41.3%	20–15–9
vs Western	28	6	0	6	0.21	43.2%	13–13–2
vs playoff teams	39	4	3	7	0.18	38.8%	16–17–6
vs non-playoff teams	33	7	1	8	0.24	46.7%	17–11–5
Recent
Last 10	10	2	1	3	0.30	33.5%	6–2–2

Split	G	A	P	5v5 xG share	5v5 CF%	5v5 GF–GA
Period
1st period	1	2	3	—	—	—
2nd period	3	1	4	—	—	—
3rd period	7	1	8	—	—	—
Overtime	0	0	0	—	—	—
Score state · 5v5 on ice
Leading	—	—	—	42.6%	39.1%	8–9
Tied	—	—	—	41.0%	43.0%	14–12
Trailing	—	—	—	44.0%	51.5%	11–12

Teammate	Pos	TOI together	xG share together	GF–GA	CF%	Him without	Teammate without
Noel Acciari	C	347:57	44.7%	22–21	44.4%	40.0%	39.8%
Marcus Pettersson	D	242:10	41.1%	12–10	42.8%	43.5%	55.1%
Kris Letang	D	238:34	43.1%	12–14	44.8%	42.3%	49.6%
Jansen Harkins	C	231:22	46.7%	14–17	49.2%	40.3%	43.9%
Erik Karlsson	D	211:56	44.5%	12–9	46.4%	41.5%	55.2%
Ryan Graves	D	194:59	42.1%	11–12	42.3%	42.8%	48.2%
Lars Eller	C	126:32	35.8%	3–3	43.9%	44.1%	47.9%
Chad Ruhwedel	D	126:06	39.1%	7–9	45.6%	43.3%	51.1%
Pierre-Olivier Joseph	D	125:14	43.2%	8–6	48.0%	42.5%	46.1%
Matt Nieto	L	113:37	38.8%	7–5	42.2%	43.5%	44.8%
John Ludvig	D	78:54	43.2%	2–3	46.0%	42.5%	51.5%
Ryan Shea	D	77:45	43.2%	2–2	40.3%	42.5%	51.4%

Season	GP	G	A	P	SOG	P/GP	5v5 ixG/60	5v5 GP
2021–22	7	4	1	5	23	0.71	0.99	7
2020–21	6	4	1	5	17	0.83	0.93	6
2017–18	4	0	0	0	11	0.00	0.34	4
2015–16	5	2	0	2	13	0.40	0.91	5

	Opponent	Result		G	A		PPP	+/−	SOG		5v5 on-ice xG share	Game
Apr 17	@ NYI	L 4–5	14:50	1	0	1	1	0	4	0.22	54.7%	View →
Apr 15	vs NSH	W 4–2	12:28	0	0	0	0	1	0	0.05	55.5%	View →
Apr 13	vs BOS	L 4–6	12:46	0	0	0	0	-2	4	0.02	19.2%	View →
Apr 11	vs DET	W 6–5 OT	12:15	1	0	1	0	1	2	0.14	24.9%	View →
Apr 8	@ TOR	OTL 2–3 OT	12:35	0	0	0	0	-1	0	0.00	2.1%	View →
Apr 6	vs TBL	W 5–4	13:01	0	0	0	0	0	2	0.09	59.2%	View →
Apr 4	@ WSH	W 4–1	12:13	0	0	0	0	1	0	0.00	14.4%	View →
Apr 2	@ NJD	W 6–3	14:29	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.03	14.0%	View →
Apr 1	@ NYR	W 5–2	13:50	0	1	1	0	1	0	0.00	33.8%	View →
Mar 30	@ CBJ	OTL 3–4 SO	14:27	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.00	0.0%	View →
Filtered 10	—	6–2–2	13:17 avg	2	1	3	1	1	13	0.54	33.5%	—

Season	Box score · all situations	5v5 individual	5v5 on ice	Season performance
2023–24	39	PIT	72	11	4	15	-7	12	90	12.2	4	12:34	—	—	0.72	0.55	5.78	0.064	1.89	2.61	42.0	44.1	—	-0.277	—	—
2022–23	38	PIT	79	13	16	29	-16	30	139	9.4	4	13:42	80	—	1.08	0.75	7.48	0.075	2.55	2.85	47.2	47.4	—	—	—	—
2021–22	37	PIT	76	19	26	45	-8	38	200	9.5	3	17:40	99	—	1.56	0.79	8.21	0.078	2.65	2.60	50.5	47.1	—	—	—	—
2020–21	36	LAK, PIT	54	17	13	30	3	22	154	11.0	2	16:34	41	—	2.05	0.93	10.79	0.070	2.41	2.38	50.2	50.7	—	—	—	—
2019–20	35	LAK	60	17	10	27	-21	36	182	9.3	3	16:56	66	—	1.56	1.05	11.22	0.066	2.58	2.54	50.4	53.1	—	—	—	—
2018–19	34	LAK	76	13	20	33	-20	42	174	7.5	5	18:09	80	—	0.87	0.64	6.55	0.063	2.11	2.53	45.5	46.8	—	—	—	—
2017–18	33	LAK	27	13	9	22	4	2	85	15.3	6	17:51	27	—	1.81	0.91	9.22	0.070	2.34	2.58	47.6	47.7	—	—	—	—
2016–17	32	LAK	82	32	34	66	2	41	250	12.8	10	18:02	86	—	2.02	0.93	9.75	0.068	2.71	2.36	53.4	54.8	—	—	—	—
2015–16	31	LAK	77	24	38	62	18	20	242	9.9	4	18:23	89	—	1.94	0.92	10.04	0.063	2.91	2.46	54.2	56.2	—	—	—	—
Career	—	9 seasons	603	159	170	329	-45	243	1516	10.5	41	16:35	—	—	1.51	0.83	8.74	0.068	2.49	2.54	49.6	50.2	—	—	—	—

2 award records

Stanley Cup · 2013–14
Stanley Cup · 2011–12

Every metric name opens its definition; the full list lives in Metrics.

Traditional statistics cover all situations. Supporting five-on-five analyses use completed games, raw adjustment and exposure from xG model v4. The two samples can differ.

An em dash means unavailable, not zero. A partial season remains partial. Where a panel reports evidence coverage, its rates use only the covered games. History never substitutes a different model, and a missing appearance interrupts a rolling model window.

Shot maps use the same shot model as Game Center and show which model version scored recent shots beside the rink. Older seasons can use earlier model versions. High danger means a model scoring probability of at least 0.20 on an unblocked attempt; for goalies, medium danger is 0.08 to 0.20 and low is below 0.08.

Special-team buckets include the wider recorded man-advantage and man-down states, read from the player’s own team; for a goalie, penalty kill means facing a power play. Their ranks need 100 recorded minutes and at least 30 qualified peers; below 100 minutes, penalty-kill percentiles are provisional. Playoff values have no ranks or percentiles. Team share is player ice time divided by team ice time in that situation, over the games the player dressed. Zone starts describe faceoff-started five-on-five shifts and exclude on-the-fly starts.

Penalties count events, including one for a double minor; bench and served-by roles are excluded, and victimless infractions have no drawn role. EPV added sums changes in the probability that the possessing team scores next; it is not standings points or an isolated player grade. Rolling windows never cross seasons or season types, and a missed game is not a zero-performance appearance. Career rates use summed counts and exposure, never an average of season rates; a missing contributing season withholds its career metric, and Performance begins in 2023–24.

Explore the full methodology →

Season			Box score · all situations												5v5 individual				5v5 on ice					Season performance
Season	Age	Team	GP	G	A	P	+/−	PIM	SOG	Sh%	PPG	TOI/GP	Hits	Blk	P/60	ixG/60	SOG/60	xG/UA	xGF/60	xGA/60	xGF%	CF%	GF%	Perf/60	Grade	Rank
2023–24	39	PIT	72	11	4	15	-7	12	90	12.2	4	12:34	—	—	0.72	0.55	5.78	0.064	1.89	2.61	42.0	44.1	—	-0.277	—	—
2022–23	38	PIT	79	13	16	29	-16	30	139	9.4	4	13:42	80	—	1.08	0.75	7.48	0.075	2.55	2.85	47.2	47.4	—	—	—	—
2021–22	37	PIT	76	19	26	45	-8	38	200	9.5	3	17:40	99	—	1.56	0.79	8.21	0.078	2.65	2.60	50.5	47.1	—	—	—	—
2020–21	36	LAK, PIT	54	17	13	30	3	22	154	11.0	2	16:34	41	—	2.05	0.93	10.79	0.070	2.41	2.38	50.2	50.7	—	—	—	—
2019–20	35	LAK	60	17	10	27	-21	36	182	9.3	3	16:56	66	—	1.56	1.05	11.22	0.066	2.58	2.54	50.4	53.1	—	—	—	—
2018–19	34	LAK	76	13	20	33	-20	42	174	7.5	5	18:09	80	—	0.87	0.64	6.55	0.063	2.11	2.53	45.5	46.8	—	—	—	—
2017–18	33	LAK	27	13	9	22	4	2	85	15.3	6	17:51	27	—	1.81	0.91	9.22	0.070	2.34	2.58	47.6	47.7	—	—	—	—
2016–17	32	LAK	82	32	34	66	2	41	250	12.8	10	18:02	86	—	2.02	0.93	9.75	0.068	2.71	2.36	53.4	54.8	—	—	—	—
2015–16	31	LAK	77	24	38	62	18	20	242	9.9	4	18:23	89	—	1.94	0.92	10.04	0.063	2.91	2.46	54.2	56.2	—	—	—	—
Career	—	9 seasons	603	159	170	329	-45	243	1516	10.5	41	16:35	—	—	1.51	0.83	8.74	0.068	2.49	2.54	49.6	50.2	—	—	—	—

Jeff Carter

Season performanceSelected-season standing and the components behind the scoreCollapse

Score breakdown

Scoring

Comparisons

Coverage

Method

Season metrics

Season vs reference

Season comparisons

Rolling Radar

Rolling Radar

On-ice impact5v5Weak 42.0% on-ice expected goal share at five-on-five (186th of 209)What the team creates and allows during the player’s five-on-five minutesExplore

Results vs expected

On ice vs off ice

Defense5v5 · AllAverage 2.61 on-ice expected goals against per 60 (119th of 209)On-ice suppression and individual disciplineExplore

Defensive metrics

Discipline & puck management

Penaltiesnet —

Puck eventsnet —

Shooting & finishingWeak 0.55 individual expected goals per 60 (157th of 209)Where the player shoots, the quality of those chances, and actual versus expected goalsExplore

Shooting by zone

Shot types135 attempts

High-danger chancesmodel probability ≥ 0.20

Shot profilecontext · not graded

Shot locations

Usage & deployment12:34 TOI per game (9:14 at five-on-five · 1:40 PP · 1:26 PK)Scoring by situation, zone starts and workloadExplore

Usage by situation

Where the 15 points come from · All situations

Zone starts — offensive of OZ + DZ

Shifts

Faceoffs

Usage by situation

Special teamsPP · PKPoor 1.99 power-play points per 60 (100th of 106)Power play and penalty killExplore

Power play

Penalty kill

FormExplore

Score breakdown

Scoring

Comparisons

Coverage

Method

Rolling Radar

Splits0.24 points per game at home · 0.18 awayVenue, rest and opponentExplore

By period and score state

Linemates5v5Most often with Noel Acciari: 348 five-on-five minutes, 44.7% xG share togetherWho he plays with at five-on-fiveExplore

PlayoffsDid not play in these playoffs · 22 career playoff gamesExplore

Every playoff run

Game log72 games · most recent at NYI, L 4–5: 1 G, 0 AOfficial totals and five-on-five evidenceExplore

Career9 NHL seasons: 603 games, 329 pointsEvery season and a recomputed career lineExplore

Data notesScopes, missing values and model evidenceExplore

Every playoff run

Defensive metrics

Discipline & puck management

Penaltiesnet —

Puck eventsnet —

Power play

Penalty kill

Results vs expected

On ice vs off ice

Shooting by zone

Shot types135 attempts

High-danger chancesmodel probability ≥ 0.20

Shot profilecontext · not graded

Usage by situation

Where the 15 points come from · All situations

Zone starts — offensive of OZ + DZ

Shifts

Faceoffs

By period and score state

Season metrics

Season vs reference