Patrice Bergeron

Team not recorded#37Center Shoots right

Age 41 · 6′1″ · 196 lb · L'Ancienne-Lorette, QC, CAN

No checked season results are available for this selection.

Games61T-322nd in NHL

Goals310.51/GP▲0.02T-15th in NHL

Assists250.41/GP▼0.31T-130th in NHL

Points560.92/GP▼0.30T-50th in NHL…

5v5 xG share57.2%9th of 192…

Avg TOI18:44T-186th in NHL…

Career awards

No checked season results are available for this selection.

No complete checked component breakdown is available for this selection.

Loading season standing and profile…

Season metrics

2019–20 · five-on-five · vs 192 positional peers

Player	Percentile	Rank
2.44		17 / 19292nd
1.22		9 / 19296th
—	—	—

Shooting & finishing	Player	Percentile	Rank
	0.87		22 / 19289th
	10.07		7 / 19297th
	16.01		8 / 19296th
	0.066		119 / 14920th
	0.35		15 / 14991st

Elite90+Strong70–89Average30–69Weak10–29Poor<10Bar length is the peer percentile, so longer is always better · tick at the 50th

How to read these comparisons

Player values are recorded season results. Peer averages are arithmetic means of qualified players in the selected group; each row uses the same peers for its average and rank. Ranks use unrounded values, with tied players sharing a rank and the next rank skipped. Lower xG against ranks better. Bar colours are the five performance tiers; context rows are blue and not graded. Differences from the average describe the season, not isolated player impact.

Goals above expected is the raw goals-minus-xG rate, without the shrinkage used in the older finishing comparison. On-ice measures include teammates, opponents and deployment. These recorded metrics describe different quantities from the adjusted Season score components beside them.

Skaters need 20 appearances and 300 five-on-five minutes; quality and finishing also need 75 unblocked attempts. Early in a season these minimums scale down with games played so far. At least 30 peers must qualify. Playoff ranks are withheld. A reviewed axis whose own evidence fails is withheld and shown with its reason rather than ranked. These workload rules do not express statistical confidence.

Position uses the NHL listed primary position available now; it does not establish historical position or actual deployment. Broad groups are forwards, defence and goalies. This version uses the current model’s covered games only.

Season vs reference

Reference

Per game · all situations

Metric2019–20ReferenceDiff

0.510.49+0.02

0.410.72-0.31

0.921.22-0.30

3.333.15+0.17

Reference: 2018–19 · 65 games.

Season comparisons

Loading peer comparisons and model evidence…

Optional recent-history profile

Rolling Radar

Recent NHL history, carried across seasons. The radar compares this broader profile with a fixed position-group reference.

Rolling profile is currently unavailable.

Rolling Radar

Loading recent-history profile…

Results vs expected

Five-on-five · what happened beside the chances created and allowed

Chances	Player	Percentile	Rank
	2.78		27 / 19286th
	2.08		25 / 19287th
	57.2		9 / 19296th

Player	Percentile	Rank
—	—	—
—	—	—
—	—	—

Player	Percentile	Rank
—	—	—
—	—	—
—	—	—

Context · not graded

5v5 goals: —
5v5 expected: 34.2–25.6
EPV added: +12.95

On ice vs off ice

Boston's share with Patrice Bergeron on the ice against the same team without him.

Share	On ice and off ice	On-minus-off gap in percentage points
xGF%	On ice 57.2% · Off ice unavailable	—
CF%	On ice 56.1% · Off ice unavailable	—
GF%	On ice unavailable · Off ice unavailable	—

On iceOff ice

Scale 40–65% · marker at 50% · right column is the on-minus-off gap in points

Loading model evidence…

Defensive metrics

Five-on-five on-ice suppression; individual events in all situations.

Player	Percentile	Rank
47.04		11 / 19295th
—	—	—
0.059		86 / 19255th

Player	Percentile	Rank
—	—	—
—	—	—
—	—	—

Physical style	Player	Percentile	Rank
	—	—	—
	—	—	—

Context · not graded

Evidence coverage: high danger 20 of 61 games.

Discipline & puck management

Recorded season event counts · all situations

Penaltiesnet —

Taken —Drawn —

Puck eventsnet —

Giveaways —Takeaways —

Blocks: —
Hits: —

Both penalty counts cover 24 of 61 games with every drawn role recorded.

Loading defensive evidence…

SituationChancesViewShot type

Shot map

All 268 attempts

Goal31Shot on goal172Missed shot65Blocked shot0Larger dot = higher xG

Shooting by zone

Hover a row to light it up · click to pin

Zone	Att	G	xG	Goal rate	Exp.	G−xG
Inner slot	40	13	5.9	32.5%	14.6%	+7.1
Point	59	4	1.6	6.8%	2.8%	+2.4
High slot	131	14	13.9	10.7%	10.6%	+0.1
Left circle	4	0	0.1	0.0%	2.7%	−0.1
Right circle	18	0	0.4	0.0%	2.2%	−0.4
Outer slot	16	0	1.2	0.0%	7.3%	−1.2
All zones	268	31	23.1	11.6%	8.6%	+7.9

Finishing evidence. Scoring 11.6% on chances vs 8.6% expected (+3.0 points), led by inner slot volume and wrist finishing.

Sorted by goals minus expected goals. Goal rate is goals per unblocked attempt against the expected rate.

Shot profile

Context · not graded

On-net rate: 75.7%
Slot share: 63.8%
Average distance: 31.1 ft
Rebound attempts / 60: 0.32

Shot types

268 attempts

Type	Share	Sh%	G−xG
Wrist	53.0%	14.5%	+5.8
Snap	20.1%	12.8%	−0.7
Tip-in	10.1%	25.0%	+1.7
Slap	6.7%	7.1%	−0.7
Deflected	5.2%	12.5%	−0.2
Backhand	4.9%	33.3%	+2.0

Share is context, not a grade. Sh% counts shots on goal only.

High-danger chances

Model goal probability ≥ 0.20

Conversion62.5%+31.1 pts vs expected

Actual62.5%

Expected31.4%

Attempts: 16
Goals: 10
Expected goals: 5.0
G−xG: +5.0

Shot locations

Loading canonical shot events…

Usage by situation

Ice time, share of team ice time, scoring and scoring rate, with where shifts start.

Scope	TOI/GP	Team share	G	A	P	P/60
Five-on-five	12:06	—	15	15	30	2.44
Power play	3:38	—	9	7	16	4.33
Penalty kill	1:43	—	1	1	2	1.15
Other	1:16	—	6	2	8	6.20
All situations	18:44	—	31	25	56	2.94

Where the 56 points come from · All situations

Goals31 · 1.63/60
Primary assists— · —/60
Secondary assists— · —/60

Zone starts — offensive of OZ + DZ

Offensive —Neutral —Defensive —

Shifts

— a game · — average

Zone starts: five-on-five · Shifts: all situations

Faceoffs

All situations · zones are read from his side of the draw · values only; no peer ranks yet

Win %: 57.9%
Draws per game: 21.49
Offensive zone: 57.2%
Defensive zone: 58.4%
Power play: 54.4%

Usage by situation

Loading usage…

Power play

221:34 recorded ice time · peers need 100 minutes

Share of team PP: —
PP points: 16
Unit xGF / 60: 7.60

Player	Percentile	Rank
4.33		41 / 9256th
—	—	—
14.62		9 / 9291st
2.06		12 / 9288th
7.60		13 / 9287th
—	—	—

Evidence coverage: goals 9 of 61 games · team time 20 of 61 games.

Penalty kill

104:46 recorded ice time · peers need 100 minutes

Share of team PK: —
SH points: 2
Unit xGA / 60: 5.95

Player	Percentile	Rank
5.95		23 / 5962nd
—	—	—
79.03		8 / 5988th
—	—	—
1.53		18 / 5971st

Evidence coverage: goals 15 of 60 games · high danger 15 of 60 games · team time 20 of 61 games.

Loading special teams…

Split	GP	G	A	P	P/GP	5v5 xG share	Team record
Venue
Home	29	13	15	28	0.97	60.9%	19–3–7
Away	32	18	10	28	0.88	54.4%	19–10–3
Rest
Back-to-back	9	5	2	7	0.78	49.1%	4–5–0
1 day of rest	29	11	15	26	0.90	57.0%	17–4–8
2+ days of rest	22	15	8	23	1.05	61.6%	16–4–2
Opponent
vs Eastern	37	22	13	35	0.95	57.6%	20–9–8
vs Western	24	9	12	21	0.88	56.5%	18–4–2
vs playoff teams	32	15	8	23	0.72	57.5%	18–8–6
vs non-playoff teams	29	16	17	33	1.14	56.9%	20–5–4
Recent
Last 10	10	5	1	6	0.60	52.3%	7–3–0

Split	G	A	P	5v5 xG share	5v5 CF%	5v5 GF–GA
Period
1st period	9	8	17	—	—	—
2nd period	12	6	18	—	—	—
3rd period	9	10	19	—	—	—
Overtime	1	1	2	—	—	—
Score state · 5v5 on ice
Leading	—	—	—	53.6%	52.0%	6–16
Tied	—	—	—	60.2%	59.4%	11–7
Trailing	—	—	—	55.2%	56.8%	3–4

Teammate	Pos	TOI together	xG share together	GF–GA	CF%	Him without	Teammate without
Brad Marchand	L	693:22	58.2%	20–27	57.6%	33.5%	52.8%
David Pastrnak	R	673:31	56.8%	20–27	57.6%	52.4%	49.2%
Charlie McAvoy	D	328:03	58.6%	8–10	54.5%	54.7%	51.9%
Torey Krug	D	301:09	58.1%	9–8	63.5%	54.9%	56.1%
Zdeno Chara	D	277:34	54.4%	8–10	49.2%	57.3%	42.8%
Brandon Carlo	D	267:12	48.9%	10–10	53.4%	60.5%	48.6%
Matt Grzelcyk	D	145:17	58.8%	3–7	54.1%	55.8%	54.5%
Connor Clifton	D	46:22	53.4%	0–3	58.0%	56.5%	48.0%
John Moore	D	45:04	53.9%	0–1	48.8%	56.5%	53.8%
Jeremy Lauzon	D	43:36	51.8%	0–4	49.0%	56.7%	52.7%
Jake DeBrusk	L	42:37	77.2%	2–0	67.0%	54.4%	52.7%
Danton Heinen	L	22:55	54.2%	0–0	58.8%	56.4%	51.6%

	Opponent	Result		G	A		PPP	+/−	SOG		5v5 on-ice xG share	Game
Aug 31	@ TBL	L 2–3 OT	29:35	0	1	1	—	0	2	0.12	66.0%	View →
Aug 29	vs TBL	L 1–3	20:38	0	0	0	—	0	1	0.03	71.7%	View →
Aug 26	vs TBL	L 1–7	13:44	0	0	0	—	0	3	0.02	59.3%	View →
Aug 25	@ TBL	L 3–4 OT	18:21	0	0	0	—	0	1	0.14	58.5%	View →
Aug 23	@ TBL	W 3–2	18:25	0	1	1	0	1	5	0.09	22.8%	View →
Aug 19	vs CAR	W 2–1	18:40	1	1	2	—	0	7	0.19	32.9%	View →
Aug 17	@ CAR	W 4–3	20:14	0	0	0	—	0	7	0.14	81.2%	View →
Aug 15	@ CAR	W 3–1	19:57	0	0	0	0	1	5	0.12	47.6%	View →
Aug 13	vs CAR	L 2–3	18:55	0	1	1	1	0	2	0.04	62.9%	View →
Aug 12	vs CAR	W 4–3 OT	24:31	1	1	2	—	1	2	0.12	64.0%	View →
Filtered 10	—	5–5	20:18 avg	2	5	7	—	3	35	1.01	52.2%	—

Season	GP	G	A	P	SOG	P/GP	5v5 ixG/60	5v5 GP
2022–23	3	1	0	1	12	0.33	1.80	3
2021–22	7	3	4	7	34	1.00	1.52	7
2020–21	11	4	5	9	44	0.82	0.86	11
2019–20	13	2	6	8	44	0.62	0.43	13
2018–19	24	9	8	17	87	0.71	1.08	24
2017–18	11	6	10	16	46	1.45	1.17	11
2016–17	6	2	2	4	19	0.67	0.80	6

	Opponent	Result		G	A		PPP	+/−	SOG		5v5 on-ice xG share	Game
Mar 10	@ PHI	W 2–0	16:52	1	0	1	—	1	3	0.07	52.4%	View →
Mar 7	vs TBL	L 3–5	13:42	0	0	0	0	-3	5	0.01	53.1%	View →
Mar 5	@ FLA	W 2–1 OT	20:17	1	0	1	—	0	3	0.00	25.8%	View →
Mar 3	@ TBL	W 2–1	16:50	0	0	0	0	1	3	0.26	100.0%	View →
Feb 29	@ NYI	W 4–0	16:35	0	1	1	—	3	1	0.00	36.4%	View →
Feb 27	vs DAL	W 4–3	18:01	0	0	0	—	0	2	0.00	75.3%	View →
Feb 25	vs CGY	L 2–5	17:38	0	0	0	0	-1	2	0.14	52.4%	View →
Feb 22	@ VAN	L 3–9	15:01	0	0	0	—	0	1	0.15	30.2%	View →
Feb 21	@ CGY	W 4–3	15:59	2	0	2	—	1	3	0.33	64.8%	View →
Feb 19	@ EDM	W 2–1 OT	19:21	1	0	1	—	1	4	0.56	86.4%	View →
Filtered 10	—	7–3–0	17:02 avg	5	1	6	—	3	27	1.53	52.3%	—

Season	Box score · all situations	5v5 individual	5v5 on ice	Season performance
2022–23	37	BOS	78	27	31	58	35	22	249	10.8	9	17:24	—	—	2.11	1.29	11.23	0.085	4.01	2.11	65.5	59.6	—	—	—	—
2021–22	36	BOS	73	25	40	65	26	32	293	8.5	8	18:10	—	—	2.21	1.03	13.40	0.064	3.77	1.69	69.1	65.6	—	—	—	—
2020–21	35	BOS	54	23	25	48	27	16	182	12.6	7	18:13	—	—	2.48	0.97	10.01	0.069	2.98	1.83	61.9	62.4	—	—	—	—
2019–20	34	BOS	61	31	25	56	23	28	203	15.3	11	18:44	—	—	2.44	0.87	10.07	0.066	2.78	2.08	57.2	56.1	—	—	—	—
2018–19	33	BOS	65	32	47	79	23	30	205	15.6	9	18:28	—	—	2.68	0.93	9.46	0.070	2.89	2.24	56.3	56.8	—	—	—	—
2017–18	32	BOS	64	30	33	63	21	26	224	13.4	10	19:26	—	—	2.21	1.00	10.30	0.069	2.93	2.19	57.1	57.7	—	—	—	—
2016–17	31	BOS	79	21	32	53	12	24	302	7.0	8	19:25	—	—	1.50	1.06	12.38	0.067	3.02	1.93	61.0	61.2	—	—	—	—
2015–16	30	BOS	80	32	36	68	12	49	282	11.3	12	19:50	—	—	1.83	0.84	10.49	0.061	2.69	2.03	57.0	56.0	—	—	—	—
Career	—	8 seasons	554	221	269	490	179	227	1940	11.4	74	18:44	—	—	2.14	1.00	11.01	0.069	3.14	2.01	60.9	59.4	—	—	—	—

10 award records

Frank J. Selke Trophy · 2022–23
Frank J. Selke Trophy · 2021–22
Mark Messier NHL Leadership Award · 2020–21
Frank J. Selke Trophy · 2016–17
Frank J. Selke Trophy · 2014–15
Frank J. Selke Trophy · 2013–14
NHL Foundation Player Award · 2013–14
King Clancy Memorial Trophy · 2012–13
Frank J. Selke Trophy · 2011–12
Stanley Cup · 2010–11

Every metric name opens its definition; the full list lives in Metrics.

Traditional statistics cover all situations. Supporting five-on-five analyses use completed games, raw adjustment and exposure from xG model v4. The two samples can differ.

An em dash means unavailable, not zero. A partial season remains partial. Where a panel reports evidence coverage, its rates use only the covered games. History never substitutes a different model, and a missing appearance interrupts a rolling model window.

Shot maps use the same shot model as Game Center and show which model version scored recent shots beside the rink. Older seasons can use earlier model versions. High danger means a model scoring probability of at least 0.20 on an unblocked attempt; for goalies, medium danger is 0.08 to 0.20 and low is below 0.08.

Special-team buckets include the wider recorded man-advantage and man-down states, read from the player’s own team; for a goalie, penalty kill means facing a power play. Their ranks need 100 recorded minutes and at least 30 qualified peers; below 100 minutes, penalty-kill percentiles are provisional. Playoff values have no ranks or percentiles. Team share is player ice time divided by team ice time in that situation, over the games the player dressed. Zone starts describe faceoff-started five-on-five shifts and exclude on-the-fly starts.

Penalties count events, including one for a double minor; bench and served-by roles are excluded, and victimless infractions have no drawn role. EPV added sums changes in the probability that the possessing team scores next; it is not standings points or an isolated player grade. Rolling windows never cross seasons or season types, and a missed game is not a zero-performance appearance. Career rates use summed counts and exposure, never an average of season rates; a missing contributing season withholds its career metric, and Performance begins in 2023–24.

Explore the full methodology →

Season			Box score · all situations												5v5 individual				5v5 on ice					Season performance
Season	Age	Team	GP	G	A	P	+/−	PIM	SOG	Sh%	PPG	TOI/GP	Hits	Blk	P/60	ixG/60	SOG/60	xG/UA	xGF/60	xGA/60	xGF%	CF%	GF%	Perf/60	Grade	Rank
2022–23	37	BOS	78	27	31	58	35	22	249	10.8	9	17:24	—	—	2.11	1.29	11.23	0.085	4.01	2.11	65.5	59.6	—	—	—	—
2021–22	36	BOS	73	25	40	65	26	32	293	8.5	8	18:10	—	—	2.21	1.03	13.40	0.064	3.77	1.69	69.1	65.6	—	—	—	—
2020–21	35	BOS	54	23	25	48	27	16	182	12.6	7	18:13	—	—	2.48	0.97	10.01	0.069	2.98	1.83	61.9	62.4	—	—	—	—
2019–20	34	BOS	61	31	25	56	23	28	203	15.3	11	18:44	—	—	2.44	0.87	10.07	0.066	2.78	2.08	57.2	56.1	—	—	—	—
2018–19	33	BOS	65	32	47	79	23	30	205	15.6	9	18:28	—	—	2.68	0.93	9.46	0.070	2.89	2.24	56.3	56.8	—	—	—	—
2017–18	32	BOS	64	30	33	63	21	26	224	13.4	10	19:26	—	—	2.21	1.00	10.30	0.069	2.93	2.19	57.1	57.7	—	—	—	—
2016–17	31	BOS	79	21	32	53	12	24	302	7.0	8	19:25	—	—	1.50	1.06	12.38	0.067	3.02	1.93	61.0	61.2	—	—	—	—
2015–16	30	BOS	80	32	36	68	12	49	282	11.3	12	19:50	—	—	1.83	0.84	10.49	0.061	2.69	2.03	57.0	56.0	—	—	—	—
Career	—	8 seasons	554	221	269	490	179	227	1940	11.4	74	18:44	—	—	2.14	1.00	11.01	0.069	3.14	2.01	60.9	59.4	—	—	—	—

Patrice Bergeron

Season performanceSelected-season standing and the components behind the scoreCollapse

Season metrics

Season vs reference

Season comparisons

Rolling Radar

Rolling Radar

On-ice impact5v5Elite 57.2% on-ice expected goal share at five-on-five (9th of 192)What the team creates and allows during the player’s five-on-five minutesExplore

Results vs expected

On ice vs off ice

Defense5v5 · AllStrong 2.08 on-ice expected goals against per 60 (25th of 192)On-ice suppression and individual disciplineExplore

Defensive metrics

Discipline & puck management

Penaltiesnet —

Puck eventsnet —

Shooting & finishingStrong 0.87 individual expected goals per 60 (22nd of 192)Where the player shoots, the quality of those chances, and actual versus expected goalsExplore

Shot map

Shooting by zone

Shot profile

Shot types

High-danger chances

Shot locations

Usage & deployment18:44 TOI per game (12:06 at five-on-five · 3:38 PP · 1:43 PK)Scoring by situation, zone starts and workloadExplore

Usage by situation

Where the 56 points come from · All situations

Zone starts — offensive of OZ + DZ

Shifts

Faceoffs

Usage by situation

Special teamsPP · PKAverage 4.33 power-play points per 60 (41st of 92)Power play and penalty killExplore

Power play

Penalty kill

FormExplore

Rolling Radar

Splits0.97 points per game at home · 0.88 awayVenue, rest and opponentExplore

By period and score state

Linemates5v5Most often with Brad Marchand: 693 five-on-five minutes, 58.2% xG share togetherWho he plays with at five-on-fiveExplore

Playoffs13 playoff games: 2 goals, 8 points · 75 career playoff gamesExplore

2019–20 playoffs

Playoff games

Every playoff run

Game log61 games · most recent at PHI, W 2–0: 1 G, 0 AOfficial totals and five-on-five evidenceExplore

Career8 NHL seasons: 554 games, 490 pointsEvery season and a recomputed career lineExplore

Data notesScopes, missing values and model evidenceExplore

2019–20 playoffs

Playoff games

Every playoff run

Defensive metrics

Discipline & puck management

Penaltiesnet —

Puck eventsnet —

Power play

Penalty kill

Results vs expected

On ice vs off ice

Shot map

Shooting by zone

Shot profile

Shot types

High-danger chances

Usage by situation

Where the 56 points come from · All situations

Zone starts — offensive of OZ + DZ

Shifts

Faceoffs

By period and score state

Season metrics

Season vs reference