Anze Kopitar

Los Angeles Kings#11Center Shoots left

Age 39 · 6′3″ · 225 lb · Jesenice, SVN

No checked season results are available for this selection.

Games81T-86th in NHL…

Goals250.31/GPT-49th in NHL…

Assists490.60/GPT-9th in NHL…

Points740.91/GPT-12th in NHL…

5v5 xG share55.7%20th of 194…

Avg TOI20:52T-80th in NHL…

Career awards

No checked season results are available for this selection.

No complete checked component breakdown is available for this selection.

Loading season standing and profile…

Season metrics

2015–16 · five-on-five · vs 194 positional peers

Player	Percentile	Rank
2.18		14 / 19493rd
0.64		68 / 19465th
—	—	—

Shooting & finishing	Player	Percentile	Rank
	0.59		111 / 19443rd
	5.35		141 / 19427th
	9.95		124 / 19436th
	0.077		68 / 15757th
	0.06		50 / 15769th

Elite90+Strong70–89Average30–69Weak10–29Poor<10Bar length is the peer percentile, so longer is always better · tick at the 50th

How to read these comparisons

Player values are recorded season results. Peer averages are arithmetic means of qualified players in the selected group; each row uses the same peers for its average and rank. Ranks use unrounded values, with tied players sharing a rank and the next rank skipped. Lower xG against ranks better. Bar colours are the five performance tiers; context rows are blue and not graded. Differences from the average describe the season, not isolated player impact.

Goals above expected is the raw goals-minus-xG rate, without the shrinkage used in the older finishing comparison. On-ice measures include teammates, opponents and deployment. These recorded metrics describe different quantities from the adjusted Season score components beside them.

Skaters need 20 appearances and 300 five-on-five minutes; quality and finishing also need 75 unblocked attempts. Early in a season these minimums scale down with games played so far. At least 30 peers must qualify. Playoff ranks are withheld. A reviewed axis whose own evidence fails is withheld and shown with its reason rather than ranked. These workload rules do not express statistical confidence.

Position uses the NHL listed primary position available now; it does not establish historical position or actual deployment. Broad groups are forwards, defence and goalies. This version uses the current model’s covered games only.

Season vs reference

Reference

Per game · all situations

Metric2015–16ReferenceDiff

0.31——

0.60——

0.91——

2.19——

First covered season: no earlier personal reference is available.

Season comparisons

Loading peer comparisons and model evidence…

Optional recent-history profile

Rolling Radar

Recent NHL history, carried across seasons. The radar compares this broader profile with a fixed position-group reference.

Rolling profile is currently unavailable.

Rolling Radar

Loading recent-history profile…

Results vs expected

Five-on-five · what happened beside the chances created and allowed

Chances	Player	Percentile	Rank
	2.74		34 / 19483rd
	2.18		56 / 19472nd
	55.7		20 / 19490th

Player	Percentile	Rank
—	—	—
—	—	—
—	—	—

Player	Percentile	Rank
—	—	—
—	—	—
—	—	—

Context · not graded

5v5 goals: —
5v5 expected: 55.3–44.0
EPV added: +8.22

On ice vs off ice

Los Angeles's share with Anze Kopitar on the ice against the same team without him.

Share	On ice and off ice	On-minus-off gap in percentage points
xGF%	On ice 55.7% · Off ice unavailable	—
CF%	On ice 57.5% · Off ice unavailable	—
GF%	On ice unavailable · Off ice unavailable	—

On iceOff ice

Scale 40–65% · marker at 50% · right column is the on-minus-off gap in points

Loading model evidence…

Defensive metrics

Five-on-five on-ice suppression; individual events in all situations.

Player	Percentile	Rank
46.60		9 / 19496th
—	—	—
0.061		137 / 19430th

Player	Percentile	Rank
—	—	—
—	—	—
—	—	—

Physical style	Player	Percentile	Rank
	—	—	—
	—	—	—

Context · not graded

Evidence coverage: high danger 18 of 81 games.

Discipline & puck management

Recorded season event counts · all situations

Penaltiesnet —

Taken —Drawn —

Puck eventsnet —

Giveaways —Takeaways —

Blocks: —
Hits: —

Both penalty counts cover 20 of 81 games with every drawn role recorded.

Loading defensive evidence…

SituationChancesViewShot type

Shot map

All 244 attempts

Goal25Shot on goal152Missed shot67Blocked shot0Larger dot = higher xG

Shooting by zone

Hover a row to light it up · click to pin

Zone	Att	G	xG	Goal rate	Exp.	G−xG
Inner slot	76	11	8.0	14.5%	10.5%	+3.0
Right circle	16	3	0.5	18.8%	3.1%	+2.5
Left circle	15	2	0.4	13.3%	2.4%	+1.6
Outer slot	9	1	0.7	11.1%	8.3%	+0.3
Point	38	1	1.0	2.6%	2.6%	0.0
High slot	90	7	8.9	7.8%	9.8%	−1.9
All zones	244	25	19.5	10.2%	8.0%	+5.5

Finishing evidence. Scoring 10.2% on chances vs 8.0% expected (+2.3 points), led by inner slot volume and deflected finishing.

Sorted by goals minus expected goals. Goal rate is goals per unblocked attempt against the expected rate.

Shot profile

Context · not graded

On-net rate: 72.5%
Slot share: 68.0%
Average distance: 26.9 ft
Rebound attempts / 60: 0.50

Shot types

244 attempts

Type	Share	Sh%	G−xG
Wrist	50.8%	10.5%	+0.9
Snap	14.3%	7.4%	−1.0
Tip-in	13.1%	26.7%	+1.2
Backhand	11.1%	18.2%	+1.3
Slap	7.4%	16.7%	+0.8
Deflected	2.0%	100.0%	+2.6
Other	1.2%	—	−0.2

Share is context, not a grade. Sh% counts shots on goal only.

High-danger chances

Model goal probability ≥ 0.20

Conversion0.0%−22.3 pts vs expected

Actual0.0%

Expected22.3%

Attempts: 8
Goals: 0
Expected goals: 1.8
G−xG: −1.8

Shot locations

Loading canonical shot events…

Usage by situation

Ice time, share of team ice time, scoring and scoring rate, with where shifts start.

Scope	TOI/GP	Team share	G	A	P	P/60
Five-on-five	14:58	—	13	31	44	2.18
Power play	2:33	—	5	13	18	5.22
Penalty kill	2:09	—	1	2	3	1.03
Other	1:12	—	9	3	12	7.39
All situations	20:52	—	28	49	77	2.73

Where the 77 points come from · All situations

Goals28 · 0.99/60
Primary assists— · —/60
Secondary assists— · —/60

Zone starts — offensive of OZ + DZ

Offensive —Neutral —Defensive —

Shifts

— a game · — average

Zone starts: five-on-five · Shifts: all situations

Faceoffs

All situations · zones are read from his side of the draw · values only; no peer ranks yet

Win %: 53.5%
Draws per game: 21.93
Offensive zone: 53.7%
Defensive zone: 54.7%
Power play: 64.8%

Usage by situation

Loading usage…

Power play

206:42 recorded ice time · peers need 100 minutes

Share of team PP: —
PP points: 18
Unit xGF / 60: 7.40

Player	Percentile	Rank
5.22		18 / 10183rd
—	—	—
13.64		13 / 10188th
1.42		48 / 10153rd
7.40		28 / 10173rd
—	—	—

Evidence coverage: goals 9 of 75 games · team time 20 of 81 games.

Penalty kill

174:24 recorded ice time · peers need 100 minutes

Share of team PK: —
SH points: 3
Unit xGA / 60: 6.33

Player	Percentile	Rank
6.33		34 / 7153rd
—	—	—
98.74		30 / 7159th
—	—	—
0.48		60 / 7116th

Evidence coverage: goals 10 of 79 games · high danger 10 of 79 games · team time 20 of 81 games.

Loading special teams…

Split	GP	G	A	P	P/GP	5v5 xG share	Team record
Venue
Home	41	12	24	36	0.88	58.7%	26–12–3
Away	40	13	25	38	0.95	52.5%	21–16–3
Rest
Back-to-back	13	6	10	16	1.23	56.8%	10–2–1
1 day of rest	44	12	26	38	0.86	53.9%	21–19–4
2+ days of rest	23	7	13	20	0.87	58.8%	16–6–1
Opponent
vs Eastern	32	14	16	30	0.94	54.1%	20–9–3
vs Western	49	11	33	44	0.90	56.8%	27–19–3
vs playoff teams	40	13	25	38	0.95	56.1%	23–14–3
vs non-playoff teams	41	12	24	36	0.88	55.3%	24–14–3
Recent
Last 10	10	1	6	7	0.70	60.1%	4–5–1

Split	G	A	P	5v5 xG share	5v5 CF%	5v5 GF–GA
Period
1st period	5	13	18	—	—	—
2nd period	12	15	27	—	—	—
3rd period	4	20	24	—	—	—
Overtime	4	1	5	—	—	—
Score state · 5v5 on ice
Leading	—	—	—	53.1%	51.8%	21–18
Tied	—	—	—	53.1%	56.3%	12–20
Trailing	—	—	—	56.7%	63.5%	7–6

Teammate	Pos	TOI together	xG share together	GF–GA	CF%	Him without	Teammate without
Drew Doughty	D	629:46	56.1%	21–18	58.7%	52.0%	54.4%
Milan Lucic	L	623:17	55.3%	24–23	58.2%	52.8%	58.6%
Brayden McNabb	D	457:33	60.5%	21–14	59.5%	49.9%	52.1%
Jake Muzzin	D	456:27	50.1%	9–20	58.1%	56.3%	55.2%
Dustin Brown	R	397:36	53.1%	14–14	57.1%	54.5%	53.0%
Marian Gaborik	R	381:18	57.2%	12–12	58.3%	52.6%	58.6%
Tanner Pearson	L	369:04	57.3%	15–21	58.0%	52.5%	54.6%
Alec Martinez	D	369:01	46.6%	7–18	52.8%	57.1%	51.9%
Tyler Toffoli	C	277:56	55.0%	10–13	57.1%	53.8%	56.0%
Luke Schenn	D	149:32	53.9%	9–7	54.5%	54.1%	49.5%
Christian Ehrhoff	D	132:31	60.6%	4–3	58.1%	53.3%	50.2%
Jamie McBain	D	109:21	56.6%	6–4	56.0%	53.8%	52.6%

	Opponent	Result		G	A		PPP	+/−	SOG		5v5 on-ice xG share	Game
Apr 22	vs SJS	L 3–6	23:50	1	0	1	0	1	3	0.20	70.5%	View →
Apr 20	@ SJS	L 2–3	20:01	0	1	1	0	1	1	0.00	50.7%	View →
Apr 18	@ SJS	W 2–1 OT	23:47	1	0	1	—	0	5	0.10	44.2%	View →
Apr 16	vs SJS	L 1–2	22:35	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.00	58.7%	View →
Apr 14	vs SJS	L 3–4	21:59	0	1	1	—	0	1	0.07	25.9%	View →
Filtered 5	—	1–4	22:26 avg	2	2	4	—	2	10	0.37	51.0%	—

Season	GP	G	A	P	SOG	P/GP	5v5 ixG/60	5v5 GP
2025–26	4	0	0	0	3	0.00	0.50	4
2024–25	6	2	7	9	8	1.50	0.56	6
2023–24	5	1	2	3	9	0.60	0.66	5
2022–23	6	2	5	7	14	1.17	0.64	6
2021–22	7	1	3	4	28	0.57	0.60	7
2017–18	4	1	1	2	9	0.50	0.58	4
2015–16	5	2	2	4	10	0.80	0.31	5

	Opponent	Result		G	A		PPP	+/−	SOG		5v5 on-ice xG share	Game
Apr 9	vs WPG	OTL 3–4 SO	21:59	0	1	1	—	-1	2	0.22	60.9%	View →
Apr 7	vs ANA	W 2–1	20:58	0	1	1	—	1	4	0.39	74.2%	View →
Apr 5	@ CGY	W 5–4 OT	22:15	0	2	2	—	1	4	0.41	71.3%	View →
Apr 4	@ VAN	L 2–3	20:45	0	0	0	—	0	2	0.02	68.4%	View →
Apr 2	vs DAL	L 2–3	20:48	0	0	0	0	1	0	0.00	30.6%	View →
Mar 31	vs CGY	W 3–0	21:12	0	2	2	—	1	1	0.23	85.1%	View →
Mar 28	@ SJS	L 2–5	21:54	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.10	25.1%	View →
Mar 26	vs EDM	W 6–4	19:07	0	0	0	0	1	1	0.01	67.6%	View →
Mar 24	@ WPG	L 1–4	20:16	1	0	1	1	-2	2	0.01	45.5%	View →
Mar 22	@ MIN	L 1–2	23:53	0	0	0	—	0	1	0.07	69.7%	View →
Filtered 10	—	4–5–1	21:19 avg	1	6	7	—	2	18	1.46	60.1%	—

Season	Box score · all situations	5v5 individual	5v5 on ice	Season performance
2025–26	38	LAK	67	12	26	38	19	10	101	11.9	5	19:07	—	—	1.45	0.61	4.41	0.084	2.38	2.21	51.8	51.6	—	—	—	—
2024–25	37	LAK	81	21	46	67	14	4	98	21.4	4	18:57	—	—	—	—	—	0.089	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
2023–24	36	LAK	81	26	44	70	11	22	133	19.5	9	19:39	—	—	1.74	0.48	4.96	0.070	2.42	2.27	51.6	53.3	—	—	—	—
2022–23	35	LAK	82	28	46	74	20	4	169	16.6	7	20:18	—	—	2.36	0.77	6.20	0.087	3.01	2.57	53.9	52.2	—	—	—	—
2021–22	34	LAK	81	19	48	67	-6	14	210	9.0	6	20:46	—	—	1.72	0.72	6.94	0.078	2.86	2.53	53.1	54.9	—	—	—	—
2020–21	33	LAK	56	13	37	50	-7	10	118	11.0	3	21:11	—	—	1.76	0.64	6.25	0.076	2.26	2.36	48.9	51.7	—	—	—	—
2019–20	32	LAK	70	21	41	62	6	16	135	15.6	7	21:02	—	—	1.70	0.58	4.87	0.081	2.37	2.43	49.4	52.1	—	—	—	—
2018–19	31	LAK	81	22	38	60	-20	30	156	14.1	1	22:18	—	—	1.54	0.59	5.04	0.082	2.21	2.72	44.8	46.5	—	—	—	—
2017–18	30	LAK	82	35	57	92	21	20	200	17.5	7	22:05	—	—	2.24	0.60	5.79	0.075	2.44	2.40	50.4	52.2	—	—	—	—
2016–17	29	LAK	76	12	40	52	-10	28	150	8.0	5	20:46	—	—	1.43	0.62	5.21	0.079	2.74	2.31	54.3	54.6	—	—	—	—
2015–16	28	LAK	81	25	49	74	34	16	177	14.1	5	20:52	—	—	2.18	0.59	5.35	0.077	2.74	2.18	55.7	57.5	—	—	—	—
Career	—	11 seasons	838	234	472	706	82	174	1647	14.2	59	20:39	—	—	—	—	—	0.079	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—

8 award records

Lady Byng Memorial Trophy · 2024–25
Lady Byng Memorial Trophy · 2022–23
Mark Messier NHL Leadership Award · 2021–22
Frank J. Selke Trophy · 2017–18
Frank J. Selke Trophy · 2015–16
Lady Byng Memorial Trophy · 2015–16
Stanley Cup · 2013–14
Stanley Cup · 2011–12

Every metric name opens its definition; the full list lives in Metrics.

Traditional statistics cover all situations. Supporting five-on-five analyses use completed games, raw adjustment and exposure from xG model v4. The two samples can differ.

An em dash means unavailable, not zero. A partial season remains partial. Where a panel reports evidence coverage, its rates use only the covered games. History never substitutes a different model, and a missing appearance interrupts a rolling model window.

Shot maps use the same shot model as Game Center and show which model version scored recent shots beside the rink. Older seasons can use earlier model versions. High danger means a model scoring probability of at least 0.20 on an unblocked attempt; for goalies, medium danger is 0.08 to 0.20 and low is below 0.08.

Special-team buckets include the wider recorded man-advantage and man-down states, read from the player’s own team; for a goalie, penalty kill means facing a power play. Their ranks need 100 recorded minutes and at least 30 qualified peers; below 100 minutes, penalty-kill percentiles are provisional. Playoff values have no ranks or percentiles. Team share is player ice time divided by team ice time in that situation, over the games the player dressed. Zone starts describe faceoff-started five-on-five shifts and exclude on-the-fly starts.

Penalties count events, including one for a double minor; bench and served-by roles are excluded, and victimless infractions have no drawn role. EPV added sums changes in the probability that the possessing team scores next; it is not standings points or an isolated player grade. Rolling windows never cross seasons or season types, and a missed game is not a zero-performance appearance. Career rates use summed counts and exposure, never an average of season rates; a missing contributing season withholds its career metric, and Performance begins in 2023–24.

Explore the full methodology →

Season			Box score · all situations												5v5 individual				5v5 on ice					Season performance
Season	Age	Team	GP	G	A	P	+/−	PIM	SOG	Sh%	PPG	TOI/GP	Hits	Blk	P/60	ixG/60	SOG/60	xG/UA	xGF/60	xGA/60	xGF%	CF%	GF%	Perf/60	Grade	Rank
2025–26	38	LAK	67	12	26	38	19	10	101	11.9	5	19:07	—	—	1.45	0.61	4.41	0.084	2.38	2.21	51.8	51.6	—	—	—	—
2024–25	37	LAK	81	21	46	67	14	4	98	21.4	4	18:57	—	—	—	—	—	0.089	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
2023–24	36	LAK	81	26	44	70	11	22	133	19.5	9	19:39	—	—	1.74	0.48	4.96	0.070	2.42	2.27	51.6	53.3	—	—	—	—
2022–23	35	LAK	82	28	46	74	20	4	169	16.6	7	20:18	—	—	2.36	0.77	6.20	0.087	3.01	2.57	53.9	52.2	—	—	—	—
2021–22	34	LAK	81	19	48	67	-6	14	210	9.0	6	20:46	—	—	1.72	0.72	6.94	0.078	2.86	2.53	53.1	54.9	—	—	—	—
2020–21	33	LAK	56	13	37	50	-7	10	118	11.0	3	21:11	—	—	1.76	0.64	6.25	0.076	2.26	2.36	48.9	51.7	—	—	—	—
2019–20	32	LAK	70	21	41	62	6	16	135	15.6	7	21:02	—	—	1.70	0.58	4.87	0.081	2.37	2.43	49.4	52.1	—	—	—	—
2018–19	31	LAK	81	22	38	60	-20	30	156	14.1	1	22:18	—	—	1.54	0.59	5.04	0.082	2.21	2.72	44.8	46.5	—	—	—	—
2017–18	30	LAK	82	35	57	92	21	20	200	17.5	7	22:05	—	—	2.24	0.60	5.79	0.075	2.44	2.40	50.4	52.2	—	—	—	—
2016–17	29	LAK	76	12	40	52	-10	28	150	8.0	5	20:46	—	—	1.43	0.62	5.21	0.079	2.74	2.31	54.3	54.6	—	—	—	—
2015–16	28	LAK	81	25	49	74	34	16	177	14.1	5	20:52	—	—	2.18	0.59	5.35	0.077	2.74	2.18	55.7	57.5	—	—	—	—
Career	—	11 seasons	838	234	472	706	82	174	1647	14.2	59	20:39	—	—	—	—	—	0.079	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—

Anze Kopitar

Season performanceSelected-season standing and the components behind the scoreCollapse

Season metrics

Season vs reference

Season comparisons

Rolling Radar

Rolling Radar

On-ice impact5v5Elite 55.7% on-ice expected goal share at five-on-five (20th of 194)What the team creates and allows during the player’s five-on-five minutesExplore

Results vs expected

On ice vs off ice

Defense5v5 · AllStrong 2.18 on-ice expected goals against per 60 (56th of 194)On-ice suppression and individual disciplineExplore

Defensive metrics

Discipline & puck management

Penaltiesnet —

Puck eventsnet —

Shooting & finishingAverage 0.59 individual expected goals per 60 (111th of 194)Where the player shoots, the quality of those chances, and actual versus expected goalsExplore

Shot map

Shooting by zone

Shot profile

Shot types

High-danger chances

Shot locations

Usage & deployment20:52 TOI per game (14:58 at five-on-five · 2:33 PP · 2:09 PK)Scoring by situation, zone starts and workloadExplore

Usage by situation

Where the 77 points come from · All situations

Zone starts — offensive of OZ + DZ

Shifts

Faceoffs

Usage by situation

Special teamsPP · PKStrong 5.22 power-play points per 60 (18th of 101)Power play and penalty killExplore

Power play

Penalty kill

FormExplore

Rolling Radar

Splits0.88 points per game at home · 0.95 awayVenue, rest and opponentExplore

By period and score state

Linemates5v5Most often with Drew Doughty: 630 five-on-five minutes, 56.1% xG share togetherWho he plays with at five-on-fiveExplore

Playoffs5 playoff games: 2 goals, 4 points · 37 career playoff gamesExplore

2015–16 playoffs

Playoff games

Every playoff run

Game log81 games · most recent vs WPG, L 3–4: 0 G, 1 AOfficial totals and five-on-five evidenceExplore

Career11 NHL seasons: 838 games, 706 pointsEvery season and a recomputed career lineExplore

Data notesScopes, missing values and model evidenceExplore

2015–16 playoffs

Playoff games

Every playoff run

Defensive metrics

Discipline & puck management

Penaltiesnet —

Puck eventsnet —

Power play

Penalty kill

Results vs expected

On ice vs off ice

Shot map

Shooting by zone

Shot profile

Shot types

High-danger chances

Usage by situation

Where the 77 points come from · All situations

Zone starts — offensive of OZ + DZ

Shifts

Faceoffs

By period and score state

Season metrics

Season vs reference