Steven Stamkos

Nashville Predators#91Center Shoots right

Age 36 · 6′1″ · 193 lb · Markham, ON, CAN

No checked season results are available for this selection.

Games77T-210th in NHL

Goals360.47/GPT-7th in NHL

Assists280.36/GPT-112th in NHL

Points640.83/GPT-24th in NHL

5v5 xG share49.7%104th of 194…

Career awards

No checked season results are available for this selection.

No complete checked component breakdown is available for this selection.

Loading season standing and profile…

Season metrics

2015–16 · five-on-five · vs 194 positional peers

Player	Percentile	Rank
1.69		53 / 19473rd
0.93		27 / 19487th
—	—	—

Shooting & finishing	Player	Percentile	Rank
	0.76		47 / 19476th
	6.55		87 / 19455th
	12.55		52 / 19474th
	0.080		46 / 15771st
	0.16		23 / 15786th

Elite90+Strong70–89Average30–69Weak10–29Poor<10Bar length is the peer percentile, so longer is always better · tick at the 50th

How to read these comparisons

Player values are recorded season results. Peer averages are arithmetic means of qualified players in the selected group; each row uses the same peers for its average and rank. Ranks use unrounded values, with tied players sharing a rank and the next rank skipped. Lower xG against ranks better. Bar colours are the five performance tiers; context rows are blue and not graded. Differences from the average describe the season, not isolated player impact.

Goals above expected is the raw goals-minus-xG rate, without the shrinkage used in the older finishing comparison. On-ice measures include teammates, opponents and deployment. These recorded metrics describe different quantities from the adjusted Season score components beside them.

Skaters need 20 appearances and 300 five-on-five minutes; quality and finishing also need 75 unblocked attempts. Early in a season these minimums scale down with games played so far. At least 30 peers must qualify. Playoff ranks are withheld. A reviewed axis whose own evidence fails is withheld and shown with its reason rather than ranked. These workload rules do not express statistical confidence.

Position uses the NHL listed primary position available now; it does not establish historical position or actual deployment. Broad groups are forwards, defence and goalies. This version uses the current model’s covered games only.

Season vs reference

Reference

Per game · all situations

Metric2015–16ReferenceDiff

0.47——

0.36——

0.83——

2.81——

First covered season: no earlier personal reference is available.

Season comparisons

Loading peer comparisons and model evidence…

Optional recent-history profile

Rolling Radar

Recent NHL history, carried across seasons. The radar compares this broader profile with a fixed position-group reference.

Rolling profile is currently unavailable.

Rolling Radar

Loading recent-history profile…

Results vs expected

Five-on-five · what happened beside the chances created and allowed

Chances	Player	Percentile	Rank
	2.30		108 / 19445th
	2.33		87 / 19455th
	49.7		104 / 19447th

Player	Percentile	Rank
—	—	—
—	—	—
—	—	—

Player	Percentile	Rank
—	—	—
—	—	—
—	—	—

Context · not graded

5v5 goals: —
5v5 expected: 42.1–42.7
EPV added: +3.91

On ice vs off ice

Tampa Bay's share with Steven Stamkos on the ice against the same team without him.

Share	On ice and off ice	On-minus-off gap in percentage points
xGF%	On ice 49.7% · Off ice unavailable	—
CF%	On ice 51.5% · Off ice unavailable	—
GF%	On ice unavailable · Off ice unavailable	—

On iceOff ice

Scale 40–65% · marker at 50% · right column is the on-minus-off gap in points

Loading model evidence…

Defensive metrics

Five-on-five on-ice suppression; individual events in all situations.

Player	Percentile	Rank
53.79		112 / 19442nd
—	—	—
0.057		67 / 19466th

Player	Percentile	Rank
—	—	—
—	—	—
—	—	—

Physical style	Player	Percentile	Rank
	—	—	—
	—	—	—

Context · not graded

Evidence coverage: high danger 31 of 77 games.

Discipline & puck management

Recorded season event counts · all situations

Penaltiesnet —

Taken —Drawn —

Puck eventsnet —

Giveaways —Takeaways —

Blocks: —
Hits: —

Both penalty counts cover 32 of 77 games with every drawn role recorded.

Loading defensive evidence…

SituationChancesViewShot type

Shot map

All 311 attempts

Goal36Shot on goal180Missed shot95Blocked shot0Larger dot = higher xG

Shooting by zone

Hover a row to light it up · click to pin

Zone	Att	G	xG	Goal rate	Exp.	G−xG
Point	78	5	2.8	6.4%	3.6%	+2.2
Inner slot	51	10	7.9	19.6%	15.4%	+2.1
Outer slot	14	3	1.6	21.4%	11.4%	+1.4
High slot	123	14	12.8	11.4%	10.4%	+1.2
Below goal line	1	1	0.1	100.0%	5.6%	+0.9
Left circle	25	3	2.2	12.0%	8.9%	+0.8
Right circle	19	0	0.6	0.0%	3.0%	−0.6
All zones	311	36	27.9	11.6%	9.0%	+8.1

Finishing evidence. Scoring 11.6% on chances vs 9.0% expected (+2.6 points), led by point volume and wrist finishing.

Sorted by goals minus expected goals. Goal rate is goals per unblocked attempt against the expected rate.

Shot profile

Context · not graded

On-net rate: 69.5%
Slot share: 55.9%
Average distance: 32.6 ft
Rebound attempts / 60: 0.55

Shot types

311 attempts

Type	Share	Sh%	G−xG
Wrist	40.5%	18.7%	+4.3
Slap	31.2%	16.2%	+4.1
Snap	12.9%	10.7%	−0.4
Backhand	7.1%	17.6%	+0.5
Tip-in	7.1%	10.0%	−0.6
Deflected	1.3%	50.0%	+0.3

Share is context, not a grade. Sh% counts shots on goal only.

High-danger chances

Model goal probability ≥ 0.20

Conversion47.1%+15.3 pts vs expected

Actual47.1%

Expected31.8%

Attempts: 17
Goals: 8
Expected goals: 5.4
G−xG: +2.6

Shot locations

Loading canonical shot events…

Usage by situation

Ice time, share of team ice time, scoring and scoring rate, with where shifts start.

Scope	TOI/GP	Team share	G	A	P	P/60
Five-on-five	14:17	—	17	14	31	1.69
Power play	3:27	—	14	9	23	5.19
Penalty kill	0:46	—	1	2	3	3.02
Other	1:14	—	5	3	8	5.02
All situations	19:45	—	37	28	65	2.56

Where the 65 points come from · All situations

Goals37 · 1.46/60
Primary assists— · —/60
Secondary assists— · —/60

Zone starts — offensive of OZ + DZ

Offensive —Neutral —Defensive —

Shifts

— a game · — average

Zone starts: five-on-five · Shifts: all situations

Faceoffs

All situations · zones are read from his side of the draw · values only; no peer ranks yet

Win %: 49.9%
Draws per game: 12.04
Offensive zone: 54.7%
Defensive zone: 49.2%
Power play: 55.4%

Usage by situation

Loading usage…

Power play

266:06 recorded ice time · peers need 100 minutes

Share of team PP: —
PP points: 23
Unit xGF / 60: 6.13

Player	Percentile	Rank
5.19		20 / 10181st
—	—	—
16.91		7 / 10194th
2.25		5 / 10196th
6.13		59 / 10142nd
—	—	—

Evidence coverage: goals 19 of 76 games · team time 32 of 77 games.

Penalty kill

59:36 recorded ice time · peers need 100 minutes

Share of team PK: —
SH points: 3
Unit xGA / 60: 4.47

Player	Percentile	Rank
4.47		—
—	—	—
101.68		—
—	—	—
1.22		—

No rank yet

Evidence coverage: goals 21 of 57 games · high danger 21 of 57 games · team time 32 of 77 games.

Loading special teams…

Split	GP	G	A	P	P/GP	5v5 xG share	Team record
Venue
Home	40	17	20	37	0.93	52.0%	24–13–3
Away	37	19	8	27	0.73	47.1%	20–15–2
Rest
Back-to-back	12	3	3	6	0.50	50.6%	5–5–2
1 day of rest	38	18	15	33	0.87	50.2%	20–16–2
2+ days of rest	26	15	10	25	0.96	48.0%	18–7–1
Opponent
vs Eastern	49	21	19	40	0.82	49.9%	28–18–3
vs Western	28	15	9	24	0.86	49.4%	16–10–2
vs playoff teams	38	13	16	29	0.76	48.4%	16–19–3
vs non-playoff teams	39	23	12	35	0.90	51.1%	28–9–2
Recent
Last 10	10	7	5	12	1.20	54.6%	5–5–0

Split	G	A	P	5v5 xG share	5v5 CF%	5v5 GF–GA
Period
1st period	7	6	13	—	—	—
2nd period	18	13	31	—	—	—
3rd period	11	7	18	—	—	—
Overtime	0	2	2	—	—	—
Score state · 5v5 on ice
Leading	—	—	—	43.8%	43.0%	7–12
Tied	—	—	—	52.3%	55.3%	17–13
Trailing	—	—	—	52.6%	56.2%	8–5

Teammate	Pos	TOI together	xG share together	GF–GA	CF%	Him without	Teammate without
Victor Hedman	D	437:39	50.6%	12–16	55.3%	48.5%	58.5%
Alex Killorn	L	437:18	47.3%	16–12	49.7%	50.8%	56.9%
Anton Stralman	D	409:42	53.0%	13–13	53.8%	47.4%	61.8%
Ryan Callahan	R	403:36	50.8%	20–7	51.4%	48.5%	50.0%
Vladislav Namestnikov	C	385:38	53.5%	10–15	56.0%	47.2%	56.2%
Braydon Coburn	D	294:25	47.3%	10–7	50.3%	50.2%	52.2%
Nikita Kucherov	R	290:40	55.8%	3–6	56.6%	47.3%	56.4%
Jason Garrison	D	283:40	50.1%	9–5	51.2%	49.1%	50.2%
Andrej Sustr	D	279:50	46.7%	6–5	50.4%	50.3%	47.5%
Matt Carle	D	262:26	44.6%	10–7	42.6%	50.9%	50.7%
Ondrej Palat	L	237:07	49.7%	7–9	53.2%	49.3%	51.7%
Nikita Nesterov	D	200:00	47.7%	4–6	53.4%	49.7%	50.0%

	Opponent	Result		G	A		PPP	+/−	SOG		5v5 on-ice xG share	Game
May 26	@ PIT	L 1–2	11:55	0	0	0	—	-1	2	0.07	10.5%	View →
Filtered 1	—	0–1	11:55 avg	0	0	0	—	-1	2	0.07	10.5%	—

Season	GP	G	A	P	SOG	P/GP	5v5 ixG/60	5v5 GP
2023–24	5	5	1	6	15	1.20	0.86	5
2022–23	6	2	2	4	19	0.67	0.84	6
2021–22	23	11	8	19	68	0.83	0.87	23
2020–21	22	8	10	18	43	0.82	0.63	22
2019–20	1	1	0	1	1	1.00	2.89	1
2018–19	4	1	1	2	10	0.50	0.61	4
2017–18	17	7	9	16	38	0.94	0.67	17
2015–16	1	0	0	0	2	0.00	0.43	1

	Opponent	Result		G	A		PPP	+/−	SOG		5v5 on-ice xG share	Game
Mar 31	vs MTL	L 0–3	21:04	0	0	0	0	0	4	0.34	51.1%	View →
Mar 28	vs TOR	W 3–0	20:06	0	2	2	—	2	2	0.10	40.3%	View →
Mar 26	vs FLA	L 2–5	23:33	1	0	1	1	0	8	0.35	57.5%	View →
Mar 25	vs NYI	W 7–4	23:00	1	0	1	0	1	3	0.41	71.5%	View →
Mar 22	vs DET	W 6–2	20:45	1	1	2	—	0	2	0.14	43.6%	View →
Mar 19	@ ARI	W 2–0	20:41	0	1	1	0	1	1	0.01	69.0%	View →
Mar 17	@ DAL	L 3–4	20:48	2	0	2	—	1	3	0.35	56.3%	View →
Mar 15	@ TOR	L 1–4	20:26	0	0	0	0	-3	3	0.30	50.0%	View →
Mar 13	@ CBJ	W 4–0	20:46	2	1	3	—	3	6	0.27	42.6%	View →
Mar 11	vs PHI	L 1–3	17:43	0	0	0	—	0	1	0.05	57.8%	View →
Filtered 10	—	5–5–0	20:53 avg	7	5	12	—	5	33	2.32	54.6%	—

Season	Box score · all situations	5v5 individual	5v5 on ice	Season performance
2026–27	36	NSH	7	4	4	8	-2	0	13	30.8	2	22:12	7	4	2.16	0.82	3.79	0.095	2.46	2.91	45.8	40.2	—	—	—	—
2025–26	35	NSH	82	42	24	66	-17	58	206	20.4	14	17:50	—	—	1.65	0.96	6.43	0.096	2.79	2.67	51.2	50.4	—	—	—	—
2024–25	34	NSH	82	27	26	53	-36	48	174	15.5	14	18:00	—	—	—	—	—	0.099	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
2023–24	33	TBL	79	40	41	81	-21	34	262	15.3	19	18:14	—	—	1.82	0.88	7.26	0.086	2.84	2.64	51.8	49.2	—	—	—	—
2022–23	32	TBL	81	34	50	84	-5	46	240	14.2	14	19:01	—	—	2.20	1.09	7.10	0.113	3.48	3.04	53.4	49.5	—	—	—	—
2021–22	31	TBL	81	42	64	106	24	36	241	17.4	16	18:29	—	—	3.06	0.81	6.62	0.088	3.30	2.79	54.2	50.8	—	—	—	—
2020–21	30	TBL	38	17	17	34	4	16	91	18.7	10	18:16	—	—	1.82	0.69	6.07	0.086	2.79	2.57	52.0	54.0	—	—	—	—
2019–20	29	TBL	57	29	37	66	14	22	176	16.5	10	18:25	—	—	3.03	0.72	7.14	0.072	2.76	2.46	52.9	50.7	—	—	—	—
2018–19	28	TBL	82	45	53	98	4	37	234	19.2	19	18:18	—	—	2.67	0.78	7.17	0.079	2.85	2.62	52.1	52.1	—	—	—	—
2017–18	27	TBL	78	27	59	86	18	72	212	12.7	15	18:46	—	—	2.80	0.77	6.87	0.081	3.03	2.53	54.5	52.7	—	—	—	—
2016–17	26	TBL	17	9	11	20	3	14	58	15.5	3	17:53	—	—	3.29	0.79	7.14	0.088	3.09	2.49	55.3	56.4	—	—	—	—
2015–16	25	TBL	77	36	28	64	3	38	216	16.7	14	19:45	—	—	1.69	0.76	6.55	0.080	2.30	2.33	49.7	51.5	—	—	—	—
Career	—	12 seasons	761	352	414	766	-11	421	2123	16.6	150	18:32	—	—	—	—	—	0.088	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—

5 award records

Mark Messier NHL Leadership Award · 2022–23
Stanley Cup · 2020–21
Stanley Cup · 2019–20
Maurice “Rocket” Richard Trophy · 2011–12
Maurice “Rocket” Richard Trophy · 2009–10

Every metric name opens its definition; the full list lives in Metrics.

Traditional statistics cover all situations. Supporting five-on-five analyses use completed games, raw adjustment and exposure from xG model v4. The two samples can differ.

An em dash means unavailable, not zero. A partial season remains partial. Where a panel reports evidence coverage, its rates use only the covered games. History never substitutes a different model, and a missing appearance interrupts a rolling model window.

Shot maps use the same shot model as Game Center and show which model version scored recent shots beside the rink. Older seasons can use earlier model versions. High danger means a model scoring probability of at least 0.20 on an unblocked attempt; for goalies, medium danger is 0.08 to 0.20 and low is below 0.08.

Special-team buckets include the wider recorded man-advantage and man-down states, read from the player’s own team; for a goalie, penalty kill means facing a power play. Their ranks need 100 recorded minutes and at least 30 qualified peers; below 100 minutes, penalty-kill percentiles are provisional. Playoff values have no ranks or percentiles. Team share is player ice time divided by team ice time in that situation, over the games the player dressed. Zone starts describe faceoff-started five-on-five shifts and exclude on-the-fly starts.

Penalties count events, including one for a double minor; bench and served-by roles are excluded, and victimless infractions have no drawn role. EPV added sums changes in the probability that the possessing team scores next; it is not standings points or an isolated player grade. Rolling windows never cross seasons or season types, and a missed game is not a zero-performance appearance. Career rates use summed counts and exposure, never an average of season rates; a missing contributing season withholds its career metric, and Performance begins in 2023–24.

Explore the full methodology →

Season			Box score · all situations												5v5 individual				5v5 on ice					Season performance
Season	Age	Team	GP	G	A	P	+/−	PIM	SOG	Sh%	PPG	TOI/GP	Hits	Blk	P/60	ixG/60	SOG/60	xG/UA	xGF/60	xGA/60	xGF%	CF%	GF%	Perf/60	Grade	Rank
2026–27	36	NSH	7	4	4	8	-2	0	13	30.8	2	22:12	7	4	2.16	0.82	3.79	0.095	2.46	2.91	45.8	40.2	—	—	—	—
2025–26	35	NSH	82	42	24	66	-17	58	206	20.4	14	17:50	—	—	1.65	0.96	6.43	0.096	2.79	2.67	51.2	50.4	—	—	—	—
2024–25	34	NSH	82	27	26	53	-36	48	174	15.5	14	18:00	—	—	—	—	—	0.099	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
2023–24	33	TBL	79	40	41	81	-21	34	262	15.3	19	18:14	—	—	1.82	0.88	7.26	0.086	2.84	2.64	51.8	49.2	—	—	—	—
2022–23	32	TBL	81	34	50	84	-5	46	240	14.2	14	19:01	—	—	2.20	1.09	7.10	0.113	3.48	3.04	53.4	49.5	—	—	—	—
2021–22	31	TBL	81	42	64	106	24	36	241	17.4	16	18:29	—	—	3.06	0.81	6.62	0.088	3.30	2.79	54.2	50.8	—	—	—	—
2020–21	30	TBL	38	17	17	34	4	16	91	18.7	10	18:16	—	—	1.82	0.69	6.07	0.086	2.79	2.57	52.0	54.0	—	—	—	—
2019–20	29	TBL	57	29	37	66	14	22	176	16.5	10	18:25	—	—	3.03	0.72	7.14	0.072	2.76	2.46	52.9	50.7	—	—	—	—
2018–19	28	TBL	82	45	53	98	4	37	234	19.2	19	18:18	—	—	2.67	0.78	7.17	0.079	2.85	2.62	52.1	52.1	—	—	—	—
2017–18	27	TBL	78	27	59	86	18	72	212	12.7	15	18:46	—	—	2.80	0.77	6.87	0.081	3.03	2.53	54.5	52.7	—	—	—	—
2016–17	26	TBL	17	9	11	20	3	14	58	15.5	3	17:53	—	—	3.29	0.79	7.14	0.088	3.09	2.49	55.3	56.4	—	—	—	—
2015–16	25	TBL	77	36	28	64	3	38	216	16.7	14	19:45	—	—	1.69	0.76	6.55	0.080	2.30	2.33	49.7	51.5	—	—	—	—
Career	—	12 seasons	761	352	414	766	-11	421	2123	16.6	150	18:32	—	—	—	—	—	0.088	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—

Steven Stamkos

Season performanceSelected-season standing and the components behind the scoreCollapse

Season metrics

Season vs reference

Season comparisons

Rolling Radar

Rolling Radar

On-ice impact5v5Average 49.7% on-ice expected goal share at five-on-five (104th of 194)What the team creates and allows during the player’s five-on-five minutesExplore

Results vs expected

On ice vs off ice

Defense5v5 · AllAverage 2.33 on-ice expected goals against per 60 (87th of 194)On-ice suppression and individual disciplineExplore

Defensive metrics

Discipline & puck management

Penaltiesnet —

Puck eventsnet —

Shooting & finishingStrong 0.76 individual expected goals per 60 (47th of 194)Where the player shoots, the quality of those chances, and actual versus expected goalsExplore

Shot map

Shooting by zone

Shot profile

Shot types

High-danger chances

Shot locations

Usage & deployment19:45 TOI per game (14:17 at five-on-five · 3:27 PP · 0:46 PK)Scoring by situation, zone starts and workloadExplore

Usage by situation

Where the 65 points come from · All situations

Zone starts — offensive of OZ + DZ

Shifts

Faceoffs

Usage by situation

Special teamsPP · PKStrong 5.19 power-play points per 60 (20th of 101)Power play and penalty killExplore

Power play

Penalty kill

FormExplore

Rolling Radar

Splits0.93 points per game at home · 0.73 awayVenue, rest and opponentExplore

By period and score state

Linemates5v5Most often with Victor Hedman: 438 five-on-five minutes, 50.6% xG share togetherWho he plays with at five-on-fiveExplore

Playoffs1 playoff game: 0 goals, 0 points · 79 career playoff gamesExplore

2015–16 playoffs

Playoff games

Every playoff run

Game log77 games · most recent vs MTL, L 0–3: 0 G, 0 AOfficial totals and five-on-five evidenceExplore

Career12 NHL seasons: 761 games, 766 pointsEvery season and a recomputed career lineExplore

Data notesScopes, missing values and model evidenceExplore

2015–16 playoffs

Playoff games

Every playoff run

Defensive metrics

Discipline & puck management

Penaltiesnet —

Puck eventsnet —

Power play

Penalty kill

Results vs expected

On ice vs off ice

Shot map

Shooting by zone

Shot profile

Shot types

High-danger chances

Usage by situation

Where the 65 points come from · All situations

Zone starts — offensive of OZ + DZ

Shifts

Faceoffs

By period and score state

Season metrics

Season vs reference