Steven Stamkos

Nashville Predators#91Center Shoots right

Age 36 · 6′1″ · 193 lb · Markham, ON, CAN

Season grade: Withheld; Incomplete data; Performance / 60−0.1028/82 GP

Games82T-8th in NHL

Goals270.33/GP▼0.18T-57th in NHL

Assists260.32/GP▼0.20T-173rd in NHL

Points530.65/GP▼0.38T-111th in NHL…

5v5 xG share—…

Avg TOI18:00244th in NHL…

Career awards

Not qualified · 2024–25 forwards

Playing-time minimum met. Rank withheld because the app’s scoring data are incomplete. The app has checked scoring results for 28 of 32 appearances (87.5%); season standings require at least 90%. Scoring data cover less than 90% of recorded workload or could not be verified.

Percentiles appear once this player qualifies for season standings. The score breakdown is under How this is calculated.

How this is calculated

Score breakdown

Component	Weight	Scaled	Contribution
Offense	25%	−0.066	−0.016
Defense	25%	−0.254	−0.063
Chance creation	20%	0.068	+0.014
Finishing	10%	−0.080	−0.008
Assisting	20%	−0.144	−0.029
Performance rate			−0.103

Per 60 rated minutes, over the scored appearances. Each component is scaled separately, then weighted; the contributions add to the performance rate at full precision, so rounded figures may differ.

Scoring

Season grade is the qualified peer percentile on the same letter bands as Game Grade — A+ ≥88, A ≥78, A− ≥68, B+ ≥58, B ≥50, B− ≥42, C+ ≥35, C ≥28, C− ≥22, D ≥15, F below 15 — and needs qualification plus at least 30 eligible peers. The letter describes this season’s performance, not permanent ability.

Comparisons

Rank and component percentiles compare this season’s qualified forwards on unrounded rates over every checked appearance; Game Grade compares one appearance with frozen historical games.

Component percentiles are never averaged into the score. Recent history is optional, from up to three completed prior seasons; small samples are provisional.

Coverage

Qualification: 16 covered appearances, 268.1 rated minutes, and 90% appearance and workload coverage. Minimums advance with league progress; valid low-sample results stay visible.

Rated minutes exclude play with a goalie pulled: 10.6 min excluded; official TOI 514.6 min.

Coverage: partial. Updated Oct 17, 2026.

Method

Five weighted components add to the performance rate. Five-on-five offense and defense account for recorded teammates, opponents and game state, so shared on-ice results are not isolated individual ability. Finishing is scored against the shot model’s historical-shooter expectation and assisting counts primary assists plus half of secondary assists; both use the strength baseline, chance creation its positional baseline.

Loading season standing and profile…

Season metrics

2024–25 · five-on-five · vs 28 positional peers

Player	Percentile	Rank
—	—	—
—	—	—
—	—	—

Player	Percentile	Rank
—	—	—
—	—	—
—	—	—
0.099		—
—	—	—

Elite90+Strong70–89Average30–69Weak10–29Poor<10No rank yetBar length is the peer percentile, so longer is always better · tick at the 50th

How to read these comparisons

Player values are recorded season results. Peer averages are arithmetic means of qualified players in the selected group; each row uses the same peers for its average and rank. Ranks use unrounded values, with tied players sharing a rank and the next rank skipped. Lower xG against ranks better. Bar colours are the five performance tiers; context rows are blue and not graded. Differences from the average describe the season, not isolated player impact.

Goals above expected is the raw goals-minus-xG rate, without the shrinkage used in the older finishing comparison. On-ice measures include teammates, opponents and deployment. These recorded metrics describe different quantities from the adjusted Season score components beside them.

Skaters need 20 appearances and 300 five-on-five minutes; quality and finishing also need 75 unblocked attempts. Early in a season these minimums scale down with games played so far. At least 30 peers must qualify. Playoff ranks are withheld. A reviewed axis whose own evidence fails is withheld and shown with its reason rather than ranked. These workload rules do not express statistical confidence.

Position uses the NHL listed primary position available now; it does not establish historical position or actual deployment. Broad groups are forwards, defence and goalies. This version uses the current model’s covered games only.

Season vs reference

Reference

Per game · all situations

Metric2024–25ReferenceDiff

0.330.51-0.18

0.320.52-0.20

0.651.03-0.38

2.123.32-1.19

Reference: 2023–24 · 79 games.

Season comparisons

Loading peer comparisons and model evidence…

Optional recent-history profile

Rolling Radar

Recent NHL history, carried across seasons. The radar compares this broader profile with a fixed position-group reference.

Rolling profile is currently unavailable.

Rolling Radar

Loading recent-history profile…

Results vs expected

Five-on-five · what happened beside the chances created and allowed

Player	Percentile	Rank
—	—	—
—	—	—
—	—	—

Player	Percentile	Rank
—	—	—
—	—	—
—	—	—

Player	Percentile	Rank
—	—	—
—	—	—
—	—	—

Context · not graded

5v5 goals: —
5v5 expected: —
EPV added: +4.12

On ice vs off ice

Nashville's share with Steven Stamkos on the ice against the same team without him.

Share	On ice and off ice	On-minus-off gap in percentage points
xGF%	On ice unavailable · Off ice unavailable	—
CF%	On ice unavailable · Off ice unavailable	—
GF%	On ice unavailable · Off ice unavailable	—

On iceOff ice

Scale 40–65% · marker at 50% · right column is the on-minus-off gap in points

Loading model evidence…

Defensive metrics

Five-on-five on-ice suppression; individual events in all situations.

Player	Percentile	Rank
—	—	—
—	—	—
—	—	—

Player	Percentile	Rank
—	—	—
—	—	—
—	—	—

Physical style	Player	Percentile	Rank
	—	—	—
	—	—	—

Context · not graded

Evidence coverage: high danger 49 of 78 games.

Discipline & puck management

Recorded season event counts · all situations

Penaltiesnet —

Taken —Drawn —

Puck eventsnet —

Giveaways —Takeaways —

Blocks: —
Hits: —

Both penalty counts cover 50 of 82 games with every drawn role recorded.

Loading defensive evidence…

SituationChancesViewShot type

Shot map

All 258 attempts

Goal27Shot on goal147Missed shot84Blocked shot0Larger dot = higher xG

Shooting by zone

Hover a row to light it up · click to pin

Zone	Att	G	xG	Goal rate	Exp.	G−xG
Outer slot	26	5	3.0	19.2%	11.5%	+2.0
High slot	96	13	12.8	13.5%	13.3%	+0.2
Below goal line	4	0	0.2	0.0%	4.5%	−0.2
Right circle	7	0	0.3	0.0%	4.7%	−0.3
Inner slot	41	6	6.7	14.6%	16.2%	−0.7
Point	38	1	1.8	2.6%	4.8%	−0.8
Left circle	46	2	3.8	4.3%	8.2%	−1.8
All zones	258	27	28.5	10.5%	11.1%	−1.5

Finishing evidence. Scoring 10.5% on chances vs 11.1% expected (−0.6 points), with the largest shortfall in the left circle.

Sorted by goals minus expected goals. Goal rate is goals per unblocked attempt against the expected rate.

Shot profile

Context · not graded

On-net rate: 67.4%
Slot share: 53.1%
Average distance: 29.9 ft
Rebound attempts / 60: 0.69

Shot types

258 attempts

Type	Share	Sh%	G−xG
Wrist	43.4%	14.3%	−0.3
Slap	27.9%	19.6%	+0.9
Snap	16.3%	14.3%	−1.3
Tip-in	7.8%	16.7%	+0.4
Backhand	2.7%	0.0%	−0.7
Deflected	1.9%	0.0%	−0.4

Share is context, not a grade. Sh% counts shots on goal only.

High-danger chances

Model goal probability ≥ 0.20

Conversion30.3%+2.5 pts vs expected

Actual30.3%

Expected27.8%

Attempts: 33
Goals: 10
Expected goals: 9.2
G−xG: +0.8

Shot locations

Loading canonical shot events…

Usage by situation

Ice time, share of team ice time, scoring and scoring rate, with where shifts start.

Scope	TOI/GP	Team share	G	A	P	P/60
Five-on-five	—	—	11	15	26	—
Power play	—	—	12	6	18	—
Penalty kill	—	—	0	0	0	—
Other	—	—	5	5	10	—
All situations	18:00	—	28	26	54	2.20

Where the 54 points come from · All situations

Goals28 · 1.14/60
Primary assists— · —/60
Secondary assists— · —/60

Zone starts — offensive of OZ + DZ

Offensive —Neutral —Defensive —

Shifts

— a game · — average

Zone starts: five-on-five · Shifts: all situations

Faceoffs

All situations · zones are read from his side of the draw · values only; no peer ranks yet

Win %: 49.9%
Draws per game: 9.68
Offensive zone: 50.7%
Defensive zone: 47.8%
Power play: 53.7%

Usage by situation

Loading usage…

Power play

— recorded ice time · peers need 100 minutes

Share of team PP: —
PP points: 18
Unit xGF / 60: —

Player	Percentile	Rank
—	—	—
—	—	—
—	—	—
—	—	—
—	—	—
—	—	—

Evidence coverage: goals 24 of 76 games · team time 50 of 82 games.

Penalty kill

— recorded ice time · peers need 100 minutes

Share of team PK: —
SH points: 0
Unit xGA / 60: —

Player	Percentile	Rank
—	—	—
—	—	—
—	—	—
—	—	—
—	—	—

Evidence coverage: goals 7 of 18 games · high danger 7 of 18 games · team time 50 of 82 games.

Loading special teams…

Split	GP	G	A	P	P/GP	5v5 xG share	Team record
Venue
Home	41	16	15	31	0.76	49.6%	20–18–3
Away	41	11	11	22	0.54	48.1%	10–26–5
Rest
Back-to-back	14	1	4	5	0.36	51.1%	3–9–2
1 day of rest	43	19	14	33	0.77	48.6%	18–20–5
2+ days of rest	24	7	8	15	0.63	46.8%	9–14–1
Opponent
vs Eastern	32	9	9	18	0.56	47.1%	9–19–4
vs Western	50	18	17	35	0.70	50.0%	21–25–4
vs playoff teams	44	12	12	24	0.55	46.3%	12–26–6
vs non-playoff teams	38	15	14	29	0.76	51.7%	18–18–2
Recent
Last 10	10	4	4	8	0.80	41.0%	3–7–0

Split	G	A	P	5v5 xG share	5v5 CF%	5v5 GF–GA
Period
1st period	6	7	13	—	—	—
2nd period	16	9	25	—	—	—
3rd period	4	9	13	—	—	—
Overtime	1	1	2	—	—	—
Score state · 5v5 on ice
Leading	—	—	—	42.5%	41.0%	3–14
Tied	—	—	—	48.2%	49.4%	13–19
Trailing	—	—	—	50.7%	52.6%	6–11

Teammate	Pos	TOI together	xG share together	GF–GA	CF%	Him without	Teammate without
Jonathan Marchessault	C	567:12	49.9%	12–24	47.2%	45.6%	49.3%
Filip Forsberg	L	546:16	47.4%	10–28	47.8%	48.1%	48.7%
Brady Skjei	D	356:29	45.5%	9–13	48.1%	48.8%	49.1%
Roman Josi	D	332:58	54.0%	10–9	54.3%	44.6%	52.3%
Ryan O'Reilly	C	256:22	48.4%	5–11	51.3%	47.6%	51.4%
Nick Blankenburg	D	239:39	45.8%	3–11	46.2%	48.2%	50.5%
Luke Schenn	D	215:57	46.5%	5–10	46.3%	48.1%	53.5%
Justin Barron	D	206:08	61.0%	5–7	56.0%	44.7%	50.2%
Marc Del Gaizo	D	172:11	43.1%	3–7	42.5%	48.5%	51.2%
Gustav Nyquist	R	144:35	52.3%	2–3	52.5%	46.9%	52.0%
Luke Evangelista	R	139:42	44.3%	4–4	50.6%	48.1%	54.0%
Alexandre Carrier	D	135:12	43.1%	5–7	43.0%	48.4%	47.3%

Season	GP	G	A	P	SOG	P/GP	5v5 ixG/60	5v5 GP
2023–24	5	5	1	6	15	1.20	0.86	5
2022–23	6	2	2	4	19	0.67	0.84	6
2021–22	23	11	8	19	68	0.83	0.87	23
2020–21	22	8	10	18	43	0.82	0.63	22
2019–20	1	1	0	1	1	1.00	2.89	1
2018–19	4	1	1	2	10	0.50	0.61	4
2017–18	17	7	9	16	38	0.94	0.67	17
2015–16	1	0	0	0	2	0.00	0.43	1

	Opponent	Result		G	A		PPP	+/−	SOG		5v5 on-ice xG share	Game
Apr 16	vs DAL	W 5–1	15:39	0	1	1	—	0	3	0.03	38.7%	View →
Apr 14	vs UTA	L 3–7	15:17	0	0	0	—	-1	2	0.08	—	View →
Apr 12	@ VGK	L 3–5	17:44	0	0	0	—	-2	0	0.00	—	View →
Apr 10	@ UTA	W 4–3 SO	19:01	0	1	1	—	-1	0	0.00	—	View →
Apr 8	vs NYI	W 7–6 OT	19:27	2	2	4	—	-2	3	0.15	—	View →
Apr 6	vs MTL	L 1–2	23:25	1	0	1	0	1	5	0.11	52.4%	View →
Apr 3	@ DAL	L 1–5	17:18	1	0	1	—	0	2	0.35	45.0%	View →
Apr 1	@ CBJ	L 4–8	16:12	0	0	0	—	-4	1	0.13	33.1%	View →
Mar 31	@ PHI	L 1–2	19:47	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.07	39.4%	View →
Mar 29	vs VGK	L 1–3	18:11	0	0	0	0	-1	1	0.05	43.5%	View →
Filtered 10	—	3–7–0	18:12 avg	4	4	8	—	-10	18	0.98	—	—

Season	Box score · all situations	5v5 individual	5v5 on ice	Season performance
2026–27	36	NSH	8	4	6	10	0	2	14	28.6	2	19:25	7	4	2.16	0.82	3.79	0.095	2.46	2.91	45.8	40.2	—	—	—	—
2025–26	35	NSH	82	42	24	66	-17	58	206	20.4	14	17:50	—	—	1.65	0.96	6.43	0.096	2.79	2.67	51.2	50.4	—	—	—	—
2024–25	34	NSH	82	27	26	53	-36	48	174	15.5	14	18:00	—	—	—	—	—	0.099	—	—	—	—	—	-0.103	—	—
2023–24	33	TBL	79	40	41	81	-21	34	262	15.3	19	18:14	—	—	1.82	0.88	7.26	0.086	2.84	2.64	51.8	49.2	—	—	—	—
2022–23	32	TBL	81	34	50	84	-5	46	240	14.2	14	19:01	—	—	2.20	1.09	7.10	0.113	3.48	3.04	53.4	49.5	—	—	—	—
2021–22	31	TBL	81	42	64	106	24	36	241	17.4	16	18:29	—	—	3.06	0.81	6.62	0.088	3.30	2.79	54.2	50.8	—	—	—	—
2020–21	30	TBL	38	17	17	34	4	16	91	18.7	10	18:16	—	—	1.82	0.69	6.07	0.086	2.79	2.57	52.0	54.0	—	—	—	—
2019–20	29	TBL	57	29	37	66	14	22	176	16.5	10	18:25	—	—	3.03	0.72	7.14	0.072	2.76	2.46	52.9	50.7	—	—	—	—
2018–19	28	TBL	82	45	53	98	4	37	234	19.2	19	18:18	—	—	2.67	0.78	7.17	0.079	2.85	2.62	52.1	52.1	—	—	—	—
2017–18	27	TBL	78	27	59	86	18	72	212	12.7	15	18:46	—	—	2.80	0.77	6.87	0.081	3.03	2.53	54.5	52.7	—	—	—	—
2016–17	26	TBL	17	9	11	20	3	14	58	15.5	3	17:53	—	—	3.29	0.79	7.14	0.088	3.09	2.49	55.3	56.4	—	—	—	—
2015–16	25	TBL	77	36	28	64	3	38	216	16.7	14	19:45	—	—	1.69	0.76	6.55	0.080	2.30	2.33	49.7	51.5	—	—	—	—
Career	—	12 seasons	762	352	416	768	-9	423	2124	16.6	150	18:31	—	—	—	—	—	0.088	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—

5 award records

Mark Messier NHL Leadership Award · 2022–23
Stanley Cup · 2020–21
Stanley Cup · 2019–20
Maurice “Rocket” Richard Trophy · 2011–12
Maurice “Rocket” Richard Trophy · 2009–10

Every metric name opens its definition; the full list lives in Metrics.

Traditional statistics cover all situations. Supporting five-on-five analyses use completed games, raw adjustment and exposure from xG model v4. The two samples can differ.

An em dash means unavailable, not zero. A partial season remains partial. Where a panel reports evidence coverage, its rates use only the covered games. History never substitutes a different model, and a missing appearance interrupts a rolling model window.

Shot maps use the same shot model as Game Center and show which model version scored recent shots beside the rink. Older seasons can use earlier model versions. High danger means a model scoring probability of at least 0.20 on an unblocked attempt; for goalies, medium danger is 0.08 to 0.20 and low is below 0.08.

Special-team buckets include the wider recorded man-advantage and man-down states, read from the player’s own team; for a goalie, penalty kill means facing a power play. Their ranks need 100 recorded minutes and at least 30 qualified peers; below 100 minutes, penalty-kill percentiles are provisional. Playoff values have no ranks or percentiles. Team share is player ice time divided by team ice time in that situation, over the games the player dressed. Zone starts describe faceoff-started five-on-five shifts and exclude on-the-fly starts.

Penalties count events, including one for a double minor; bench and served-by roles are excluded, and victimless infractions have no drawn role. EPV added sums changes in the probability that the possessing team scores next; it is not standings points or an isolated player grade. Rolling windows never cross seasons or season types, and a missed game is not a zero-performance appearance. Career rates use summed counts and exposure, never an average of season rates; a missing contributing season withholds its career metric, and Performance begins in 2023–24.

Explore the full methodology →

Season			Box score · all situations												5v5 individual				5v5 on ice					Season performance
Season	Age	Team	GP	G	A	P	+/−	PIM	SOG	Sh%	PPG	TOI/GP	Hits	Blk	P/60	ixG/60	SOG/60	xG/UA	xGF/60	xGA/60	xGF%	CF%	GF%	Perf/60	Grade	Rank
2026–27	36	NSH	8	4	6	10	0	2	14	28.6	2	19:25	7	4	2.16	0.82	3.79	0.095	2.46	2.91	45.8	40.2	—	—	—	—
2025–26	35	NSH	82	42	24	66	-17	58	206	20.4	14	17:50	—	—	1.65	0.96	6.43	0.096	2.79	2.67	51.2	50.4	—	—	—	—
2024–25	34	NSH	82	27	26	53	-36	48	174	15.5	14	18:00	—	—	—	—	—	0.099	—	—	—	—	—	-0.103	—	—
2023–24	33	TBL	79	40	41	81	-21	34	262	15.3	19	18:14	—	—	1.82	0.88	7.26	0.086	2.84	2.64	51.8	49.2	—	—	—	—
2022–23	32	TBL	81	34	50	84	-5	46	240	14.2	14	19:01	—	—	2.20	1.09	7.10	0.113	3.48	3.04	53.4	49.5	—	—	—	—
2021–22	31	TBL	81	42	64	106	24	36	241	17.4	16	18:29	—	—	3.06	0.81	6.62	0.088	3.30	2.79	54.2	50.8	—	—	—	—
2020–21	30	TBL	38	17	17	34	4	16	91	18.7	10	18:16	—	—	1.82	0.69	6.07	0.086	2.79	2.57	52.0	54.0	—	—	—	—
2019–20	29	TBL	57	29	37	66	14	22	176	16.5	10	18:25	—	—	3.03	0.72	7.14	0.072	2.76	2.46	52.9	50.7	—	—	—	—
2018–19	28	TBL	82	45	53	98	4	37	234	19.2	19	18:18	—	—	2.67	0.78	7.17	0.079	2.85	2.62	52.1	52.1	—	—	—	—
2017–18	27	TBL	78	27	59	86	18	72	212	12.7	15	18:46	—	—	2.80	0.77	6.87	0.081	3.03	2.53	54.5	52.7	—	—	—	—
2016–17	26	TBL	17	9	11	20	3	14	58	15.5	3	17:53	—	—	3.29	0.79	7.14	0.088	3.09	2.49	55.3	56.4	—	—	—	—
2015–16	25	TBL	77	36	28	64	3	38	216	16.7	14	19:45	—	—	1.69	0.76	6.55	0.080	2.30	2.33	49.7	51.5	—	—	—	—
Career	—	12 seasons	762	352	416	768	-9	423	2124	16.6	150	18:31	—	—	—	—	—	0.088	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—

Steven Stamkos

Season performanceSelected-season standing and the components behind the scoreCollapse

Score breakdown

Scoring

Comparisons

Coverage

Method

Season metrics

Season vs reference

Season comparisons

Rolling Radar

Rolling Radar

On-ice impact5v5What the team creates and allows during the player’s five-on-five minutesWhat the team creates and allows during the player’s five-on-five minutesExplore

Results vs expected

On ice vs off ice

Defense5v5 · AllOn-ice suppression and individual disciplineOn-ice suppression and individual disciplineExplore

Defensive metrics

Discipline & puck management

Penaltiesnet —

Puck eventsnet —

Shooting & finishingWhere the player shoots, the quality of those chances, and actual versus expected goalsWhere the player shoots, the quality of those chances, and actual versus expected goalsExplore

Shot map

Shooting by zone

Shot profile

Shot types

High-danger chances

Shot locations

Usage & deployment18:00 TOI per gameScoring by situation, zone starts and workloadExplore

Usage by situation

Where the 54 points come from · All situations

Zone starts — offensive of OZ + DZ

Shifts

Faceoffs

Usage by situation

Special teamsPP · PKPower play and penalty killPower play and penalty killExplore

Power play

Penalty kill

FormExplore

Rolling Radar

Splits0.76 points per game at home · 0.54 awayVenue, rest and opponentExplore

By period and score state

Linemates5v5Most often with Jonathan Marchessault: 567 five-on-five minutes, 49.9% xG share togetherWho he plays with at five-on-fiveExplore

PlayoffsDid not play in these playoffs · 79 career playoff gamesExplore

Every playoff run

Game log82 games · most recent vs DAL, W 5–1: 0 G, 1 AOfficial totals and five-on-five evidenceExplore

Career12 NHL seasons: 762 games, 768 pointsEvery season and a recomputed career lineExplore

Data notesScopes, missing values and model evidenceExplore

Every playoff run

Score breakdown

Scoring

Comparisons

Coverage

Method

Defensive metrics

Discipline & puck management

Penaltiesnet —

Puck eventsnet —

Power play

Penalty kill

Results vs expected

On ice vs off ice

Shot map

Shooting by zone

Shot profile

Shot types

High-danger chances

Usage by situation

Where the 54 points come from · All situations

Zone starts — offensive of OZ + DZ

Shifts

Faceoffs

By period and score state

Season metrics

Season vs reference