Jordan Eberle

Seattle Kraken#7Right wing Shoots right

Age 36 · 5′11″ · 180 lb · Regina, SK, CAN

Season grade: Withheld; Incomplete data; Performance / 600.0420/78 GP

Games78T-215th in NHL

Goals170.22/GP▼0.03T-165th in NHL

Assists270.35/GP▼0.18T-161st in NHL

Points440.56/GP▼0.20T-167th in NHL…

5v5 xG share57.1%9th of 103…

Avg TOI17:27T-279th in NHL…

Not qualified · 2023–24 forwards

Playing-time minimum met. Rank withheld because the app’s scoring data are incomplete. The app has checked scoring results for 20 of 49 appearances (40.8%); season standings require at least 90%. Scoring data cover less than 90% of recorded workload or could not be verified.

Percentiles appear once this player qualifies for season standings. The score breakdown is under How this is calculated.

How this is calculated

Score breakdown

Component	Weight	Scaled	Contribution
Offense	25%	0.063	+0.016
Defense	25%	0.198	+0.049
Chance creation	20%	0.096	+0.019
Finishing	10%	−0.065	−0.007
Assisting	20%	−0.179	−0.036
Performance rate			0.042

Per 60 rated minutes, over the scored appearances. Each component is scaled separately, then weighted; the contributions add to the performance rate at full precision, so rounded figures may differ.

Scoring

Season grade is the qualified peer percentile on the same letter bands as Game Grade — A+ ≥88, A ≥78, A− ≥68, B+ ≥58, B ≥50, B− ≥42, C+ ≥35, C ≥28, C− ≥22, D ≥15, F below 15 — and needs qualification plus at least 30 eligible peers. The letter describes this season’s performance, not permanent ability.

Comparisons

Rank and component percentiles compare this season’s qualified forwards on unrounded rates over every checked appearance; Game Grade compares one appearance with frozen historical games.

Component percentiles are never averaged into the score. Recent history is optional, from up to three completed prior seasons; small samples are provisional.

Coverage

Qualification: 17 covered appearances, 289.5 rated minutes, and 90% appearance and workload coverage. Minimums advance with league progress; valid low-sample results stay visible.

Rated minutes exclude play with a goalie pulled: 8.1 min excluded; official TOI 359.7 min.

Coverage: partial. Updated Oct 17, 2026.

Method

Five weighted components add to the performance rate. Five-on-five offense and defense account for recorded teammates, opponents and game state, so shared on-ice results are not isolated individual ability. Finishing is scored against the shot model’s historical-shooter expectation and assisting counts primary assists plus half of secondary assists; both use the strength baseline, chance creation its positional baseline.

Legacy rating

Legacy season score: 66.4 / 100. The fixed exposure baseline is 50; this is separate from the season peer grade.

Loading season standing and profile…

Season metrics

2023–24 · five-on-five · vs 103 positional peers

Player	Percentile	Rank
1.55		60 / 10342nd
0.50		77 / 10325th
—	—	—

Shooting & finishing	Player	Percentile	Rank
	0.88		21 / 10380th
	7.40		46 / 10356th
	13.58		50 / 10352nd
	0.086		9 / 9291st
	-0.38		87 / 925th

Elite90+Strong70–89Average30–69Weak10–29Poor<10Bar length is the peer percentile, so longer is always better · tick at the 50th

How to read these comparisons

Player values are recorded season results. Peer averages are arithmetic means of qualified players in the selected group; each row uses the same peers for its average and rank. Ranks use unrounded values, with tied players sharing a rank and the next rank skipped. Lower xG against ranks better. Bar colours are the five performance tiers; context rows are blue and not graded. Differences from the average describe the season, not isolated player impact.

Goals above expected is the raw goals-minus-xG rate, without the shrinkage used in the older finishing comparison. On-ice measures include teammates, opponents and deployment. These recorded metrics describe different quantities from the adjusted Season score components beside them.

Skaters need 20 appearances and 300 five-on-five minutes; quality and finishing also need 75 unblocked attempts. Early in a season these minimums scale down with games played so far. At least 30 peers must qualify. Playoff ranks are withheld. A reviewed axis whose own evidence fails is withheld and shown with its reason rather than ranked. These workload rules do not express statistical confidence.

Position uses the NHL listed primary position available now; it does not establish historical position or actual deployment. Broad groups are forwards, defence and goalies. This version uses the current model’s covered games only.

Season vs reference

Reference

Per game · all situations

Metric2023–24ReferenceDiff

0.220.24-0.03

0.350.52-0.18

0.560.77-0.20

2.152.16-0.00

Reference: 2022–23 · 82 games.

Season comparisons

Loading peer comparisons and model evidence…

Optional recent-history profile

Rolling Radar

Recent NHL history, carried across seasons. The radar compares this broader profile with a fixed position-group reference.

Rolling profile is currently unavailable.

Rolling Radar

Loading recent-history profile…

Results vs expected

Five-on-five · what happened beside the chances created and allowed

Chances	Player	Percentile	Rank
	2.99		15 / 10386th
	2.24		17 / 10384th
	57.1		9 / 10392nd

Player	Percentile	Rank
—	—	—
—	—	—
—	—	—

Player	Percentile	Rank
—	—	—
—	—	—
—	—	—

Context · not graded

5v5 goals: —
5v5 expected: 54.1–40.6
EPV added: +8.55

On ice vs off ice

Seattle's share with Jordan Eberle on the ice against the same team without him.

Share	On ice and off ice	On-minus-off gap in percentage points
xGF%	On ice 57.1% · Off ice unavailable	—
CF%	On ice 54.1% · Off ice unavailable	—
GF%	On ice unavailable · Off ice unavailable	—

On iceOff ice

Scale 40–65% · marker at 50% · right column is the on-minus-off gap in points

Loading model evidence…

Defensive metrics

Five-on-five on-ice suppression; individual events in all situations.

Player	Percentile	Rank
53.65		14 / 10387th
—	—	—
0.055		10 / 10391st

Player	Percentile	Rank
—	—	—
—	—	—
—	—	—

Physical style	Player	Percentile	Rank
	—	—	—
	—	—	—

Context · not graded

Evidence coverage: high danger 26 of 78 games.

Discipline & puck management

Recorded season event counts · all situations

Penaltiesnet —

Taken —Drawn —

Puck eventsnet —

Giveaways —Takeaways —

Blocks: —
Hits: —

Both penalty counts cover 29 of 78 games with every drawn role recorded.

Loading defensive evidence…

SituationChancesViewShot type

Shot map

All 243 attempts

Goal17Shot on goal151Missed shot75Blocked shot0Larger dot = higher xG

Shooting by zone

Hover a row to light it up · click to pin

Zone	Att	G	xG	Goal rate	Exp.	G−xG
Below goal line	2	1	0.1	50.0%	2.6%	+0.9
Right circle	25	1	0.6	4.0%	2.6%	+0.4
Left circle	9	0	0.3	0.0%	3.1%	−0.3
Point	26	0	0.4	0.0%	1.5%	−0.4
Outer slot	30	2	2.8	6.7%	9.2%	−0.8
High slot	61	5	6.4	8.2%	10.4%	−1.4
Inner slot	90	8	14.6	8.9%	16.2%	−6.6
All zones	243	17	25.1	7.0%	10.3%	−8.1

Finishing evidence. Scoring 7.0% on chances vs 10.3% expected (−3.3 points), with the largest shortfall in the inner slot.

Sorted by goals minus expected goals. Goal rate is goals per unblocked attempt against the expected rate.

Shot profile

Context · not graded

On-net rate: 69.1%
Slot share: 62.1%
Average distance: 23.7 ft
Rebound attempts / 60: 0.79

Shot types

243 attempts

Type	Share	Sh%	G−xG
Wrist	59.7%	6.5%	−7.0
Backhand	14.8%	19.2%	+1.1
Snap	11.1%	21.1%	+0.4
Tip-in	10.7%	11.1%	−1.9
Deflected	2.1%	0.0%	−0.6
Slap	1.6%	0.0%	−0.2

Share is context, not a grade. Sh% counts shots on goal only.

High-danger chances

Model goal probability ≥ 0.20

Conversion32.1%+0.6 pts vs expected

Actual32.1%

Expected31.6%

Attempts: 28
Goals: 9
Expected goals: 8.8
G−xG: +0.2

Shot locations

Loading canonical shot events…

Usage by situation

Ice time, share of team ice time, scoring and scoring rate, with where shifts start.

Scope	TOI/GP	Team share	G	A	P	P/60
Five-on-five	13:56	—	9	19	28	1.55
Power play	2:38	—	6	6	12	3.50
Penalty kill	0:01	—	0	0	0	0.00
Other	0:51	—	3	2	5	4.50
All situations	17:27	—	18	27	45	1.98

Where the 45 points come from · All situations

Goals18 · 0.79/60
Primary assists— · —/60
Secondary assists— · —/60

Zone starts — offensive of OZ + DZ

Offensive —Neutral —Defensive —

Shifts

— a game · — average

Zone starts: five-on-five · Shifts: all situations

Usage by situation

Loading usage…

Power play

205:40 recorded ice time · peers need 100 minutes

Share of team PP: —
PP points: 12
Unit xGF / 60: 8.00

Player	Percentile	Rank
3.50		36 / 5738th
—	—	—
7.88		49 / 5714th
1.94		26 / 5755th
8.00		27 / 5754th
—	—	—

Evidence coverage: goals 16 of 77 games · team time 29 of 78 games.

Penalty kill

1:21 recorded ice time · peers need 100 minutes

Share of team PK: —
SH points: 0
Unit xGA / 60: 0.00

Player	Percentile	Rank
0.00		—
—	—	—
0.00		—
—	—	—
0.00		—

No rank yet

Evidence coverage: goals 3 of 12 games · high danger 3 of 12 games · team time 29 of 78 games.

Loading special teams…

Split	GP	G	A	P	P/GP	5v5 xG share	Team record
Venue
Home	38	11	13	24	0.63	55.1%	17–16–5
Away	40	6	14	20	0.50	58.9%	16–17–7
Rest
Back-to-back	7	1	3	4	0.57	63.6%	3–3–1
1 day of rest	47	12	13	25	0.53	55.7%	19–22–6
2+ days of rest	23	4	10	14	0.61	58.0%	11–7–5
Opponent
vs Eastern	32	10	10	20	0.63	54.8%	15–13–4
vs Western	46	7	17	24	0.52	58.8%	18–20–8
vs playoff teams	38	8	13	21	0.55	56.0%	14–18–6
vs non-playoff teams	40	9	14	23	0.57	58.1%	19–15–6
Recent
Last 10	10	0	3	3	0.30	57.1%	4–6–0

Teammate	Pos	TOI together	xG share together	GF–GA	CF%	Him without	Teammate without
Matty Beniers	C	748:22	56.1%	20–29	53.0%	57.9%	42.1%
Jared McCann	L	452:53	55.4%	17–17	54.8%	57.5%	48.6%
Adam Larsson	D	417:31	52.3%	12–15	54.1%	59.5%	47.9%
Jamie Oleksiak	D	343:45	57.3%	15–10	51.2%	56.4%	49.2%
Will Borgen	D	336:08	56.9%	14–9	49.5%	56.6%	49.3%
Vince Dunn	D	335:40	55.8%	7–9	56.1%	57.1%	47.6%
Brian Dumoulin	D	297:25	61.4%	11–12	59.1%	54.9%	51.8%
Tomas Tatar	L	295:30	56.6%	7–6	53.0%	56.7%	39.6%
Justin Schultz	D	267:13	57.7%	6–11	54.9%	56.3%	51.4%
Jaden Schwartz	C	195:15	60.3%	10–2	55.8%	55.9%	50.6%
Ryker Evans	D	162:48	58.4%	5–4	54.7%	56.4%	50.8%
Tye Kartye	L	136:30	56.6%	4–6	54.5%	56.7%	48.6%

	Opponent	Result		A		PPP	+/−	SOG		5v5 on-ice xG share	Game
Apr 18	@ MIN	W 4–3	17:25	0	0	0	-1	3	0.31	55.3%	View →
Apr 16	@ WPG	L 3–4	15:58	0	0	0	0	0	0.00	19.8%	View →
Apr 14	@ STL	L 1–4	18:38	0	0	0	-1	0	0.00	22.2%	View →
Apr 13	@ DAL	L 1–3	19:54	0	0	—	0	2	0.30	75.4%	View →
Apr 11	vs SJS	L 1–3	16:55	1	1	—	-1	2	0.25	66.2%	View →
Apr 9	vs ARI	W 5–0	16:46	1	1	—	1	1	0.45	30.9%	View →
Apr 5	@ ANA	W 3–1	16:29	0	0	—	0	1	0.17	73.2%	View →
Apr 3	@ LAK	L 2–5	20:08	0	0	—	-1	4	0.39	60.7%	View →
Apr 1	@ SJS	W 4–2	16:00	1	1	0	2	1	0.26	91.4%	View →
Mar 30	vs DAL	L 0–3	17:04	0	0	0	-2	1	0.03	16.5%	View →
Filtered 10	—	4–6–0	17:32 avg	3	3	—	-3	15	2.15	57.1%	—

Teammate	Pos	TOI together	xG share together	GF–GA	CF%	Him without	Teammate without
Matty Beniers	C	748:22	56.1%	20–29	53.0%	57.9%	42.1%
Jared McCann	L	452:53	55.4%	17–17	54.8%	57.5%	48.6%
Adam Larsson	D	417:31	52.3%	12–15	54.1%	59.5%	47.9%
Jamie Oleksiak	D	343:45	57.3%	15–10	51.2%	56.4%	49.2%
Will Borgen	D	336:08	56.9%	14–9	49.5%	56.6%	49.3%
Vince Dunn	D	335:40	55.8%	7–9	56.1%	57.1%	47.6%
Brian Dumoulin	D	297:25	61.4%	11–12	59.1%	54.9%	51.8%
Tomas Tatar	L	295:30	56.6%	7–6	53.0%	56.7%	39.6%
Justin Schultz	D	267:13	57.7%	6–11	54.9%	56.3%	51.4%
Jaden Schwartz	C	195:15	60.3%	10–2	55.8%	55.9%	50.6%
Ryker Evans	D	162:48	58.4%	5–4	54.7%	56.4%	50.8%
Tye Kartye	L	136:30	56.6%	4–6	54.5%	56.7%	48.6%

Split	GP	G	A	P	P/GP	5v5 xG share	Team record
Venue
Home	38	11	13	24	0.63	55.1%	17–16–5
Away	40	6	14	20	0.50	58.9%	16–17–7
Rest
Back-to-back	7	1	3	4	0.57	63.6%	3–3–1
1 day of rest	47	12	13	25	0.53	55.7%	19–22–6
2+ days of rest	23	4	10	14	0.61	58.0%	11–7–5
Opponent
vs Eastern	32	10	10	20	0.63	54.8%	15–13–4
vs Western	46	7	17	24	0.52	58.8%	18–20–8
vs playoff teams	38	8	13	21	0.55	56.0%	14–18–6
vs non-playoff teams	40	9	14	23	0.57	58.1%	19–15–6
Recent
Last 10	10	0	3	3	0.30	57.1%	4–6–0

Split	G	A	P	5v5 xG share	5v5 CF%	5v5 GF–GA
Period
1st period	7	8	15	—	—	—
2nd period	6	10	16	—	—	—
3rd period	3	9	12	—	—	—
Overtime	1	0	1	—	—	—
Score state · 5v5 on ice
Leading	—	—	—	57.3%	50.1%	15–7
Tied	—	—	—	58.2%	54.6%	10–13
Trailing	—	—	—	54.7%	57.1%	11–15

Season	GP	G	A	P	SOG	P/GP	5v5 ixG/60	5v5 GP
2022–23	14	6	5	11	31	0.79	0.65	14
2020–21	19	4	7	11	46	0.58	0.80	19
2019–20	22	5	9	14	53	0.64	0.88	22
2018–19	8	4	5	9	25	1.13	2.01	8
2016–17	13	0	2	2	22	0.15	0.69	13

Season			Box score · all situations												5v5 individual				5v5 on ice					Season performance
Season	Age	Team	GP	G	A	P	+/−	PIM	SOG	Sh%	PPG	TOI/GP	Hits	Blk	P/60	ixG/60	SOG/60	xG/UA	xGF/60	xGA/60	xGF%	CF%	GF%	Perf/60	Grade	Rank
2026–27	36	SEA	9	3	4	7	-5	6	18	16.7	1	—	—	—	0.98	1.54	8.82	0.112	2.73	2.91	48.4	44.0	—	—	—	—
2025–26	35	SEA	80	26	29	55	2	28	168	15.5	4	18:29	—	—	1.66	0.75	5.85	0.082	2.39	2.50	48.9	48.4	—	—	—	—
2024–25	34	SEA	42	9	17	26	0	14	66	13.6	1	16:16	—	—	—	—	—	0.104	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
2023–24	33	SEA	78	17	27	44	1	17	168	10.1	6	17:27	—	—	1.55	0.88	7.40	0.086	2.99	2.24	57.1	54.1	—	0.042	—	—
2022–23	32	SEA	82	20	43	63	6	34	177	11.3	3	16:41	—	—	2.39	0.94	8.08	0.085	3.12	2.56	55.0	52.3	—	—	—	—
2021–22	31	SEA	79	21	23	44	-28	14	164	12.8	4	17:57	—	—	1.71	0.80	6.95	0.086	2.55	2.41	51.4	49.4	—	—	—	—
2020–21	30	NYI	55	16	17	33	9	16	128	12.5	1	16:45	—	—	2.06	0.96	8.10	0.088	3.37	2.09	61.8	55.6	—	—	—	—
2019–20	29	NYI	58	16	24	40	1	12	136	11.8	4	17:49	—	—	1.92	0.99	7.39	0.095	3.23	2.48	56.5	51.6	—	—	—	—
2018–19	28	NYI	78	19	18	37	-6	17	160	11.9	7	16:32	—	—	1.41	0.74	6.63	0.081	2.85	2.61	52.2	49.2	—	—	—	—
2017–18	27	NYI	81	25	34	59	5	21	183	13.7	3	16:04	—	—	2.49	0.96	8.08	0.090	3.33	2.74	54.9	53.3	—	—	—	—
2016–17	26	EDM	82	20	31	51	3	16	208	9.6	4	16:46	—	—	1.75	0.93	8.27	0.079	2.94	2.59	53.2	51.8	—	—	—	—
2015–16	25	EDM	69	25	22	47	-12	14	173	14.5	7	17:51	—	—	1.89	0.94	7.32	0.091	2.89	2.85	50.4	51.1	—	—	—	—
Career	—	12 seasons	793	217	289	506	-24	209	1749	12.4	45	—	—	—	—	—	—	0.087	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—

Jordan Eberle

Season performanceSelected-season standing and the components behind the scoreCollapse

Score breakdown

Scoring

Comparisons

Coverage

Method

Season metrics

Season vs reference

Season comparisons

Rolling Radar

Rolling Radar

On-ice impact5v5Elite 57.1% on-ice expected goal share at five-on-five (9th of 103)What the team creates and allows during the player’s five-on-five minutesExplore

Results vs expected

On ice vs off ice

Defense5v5 · AllStrong 2.24 on-ice expected goals against per 60 (17th of 103)On-ice suppression and individual disciplineExplore

Defensive metrics

Discipline & puck management

Penaltiesnet —

Puck eventsnet —

Shooting & finishingStrong 0.88 individual expected goals per 60 (21st of 103)Where the player shoots, the quality of those chances, and actual versus expected goalsExplore

Shot map

Shooting by zone

Shot profile

Shot types

High-danger chances

Shot locations

Usage & deployment17:27 TOI per game (13:56 at five-on-five · 2:38 PP · 0:01 PK)Scoring by situation, zone starts and workloadExplore

Usage by situation

Where the 45 points come from · All situations

Zone starts — offensive of OZ + DZ

Shifts

Usage by situation

Special teamsPP · PKAverage 3.50 power-play points per 60 (36th of 57)Power play and penalty killExplore

Power play

Penalty kill

FormExplore

Score breakdown

Scoring

Comparisons

Coverage

Method

Rolling Radar

Splits0.63 points per game at home · 0.50 awayVenue, rest and opponentExplore

By period and score state

Linemates5v5Most often with Matty Beniers: 748 five-on-five minutes, 56.1% xG share togetherExplore

PlayoffsDid not play in these playoffs · 76 career playoff gamesExplore

Every playoff run

Game log78 games · most recent at MIN, W 4–3: 0 G, 0 AOfficial totals and five-on-five evidenceExplore

Career12 NHL seasons: 793 games, 506 pointsEvery season and a recomputed career lineExplore

Data notesScopes, missing values and model evidenceExplore

Every playoff run

Defensive metrics

Discipline & puck management

Penaltiesnet —

Puck eventsnet —

Power play

Penalty kill

Results vs expected

On ice vs off ice

Shot map

Shooting by zone

Shot profile

Shot types

High-danger chances

Usage by situation

Where the 45 points come from · All situations

Zone starts — offensive of OZ + DZ

Shifts

By period and score state

Season metrics

Season vs reference