Jeff Skinner

San Jose Sharks#53Left wing Shoots left

Age 34 · 5′11″ · 200 lb · Toronto, ON, CAN

No checked season results are available for this selection.

Games79T-192nd in NHL

Goals350.44/GP▲0.03T-36th in NHL

Assists470.59/GP▲0.22T-40th in NHL

Points821.04/GP▲0.25T-27th in NHL…

5v5 xG share53.0%35th of 119…

Avg TOI17:24T-286th in NHL…

Career awards

No checked season results are available for this selection.

No complete checked component breakdown is available for this selection.

Loading season standing and profile…

Season metrics

2022–23 · five-on-five · vs 119 positional peers

Player	Percentile	Rank
3.13		1 / 11999th
1.40		4 / 11997th
—	—	—

Shooting & finishing	Player	Percentile	Rank
	1.17		11 / 11992nd
	9.51		17 / 11986th
	17.51		10 / 11992nd
	0.090		32 / 10370th
	0.23		11 / 10390th

Elite90+Strong70–89Average30–69Weak10–29Poor<10Bar length is the peer percentile, so longer is always better · tick at the 50th

How to read these comparisons

Player values are recorded season results. Peer averages are arithmetic means of qualified players in the selected group; each row uses the same peers for its average and rank. Ranks use unrounded values, with tied players sharing a rank and the next rank skipped. Lower xG against ranks better. Bar colours are the five performance tiers; context rows are blue and not graded. Differences from the average describe the season, not isolated player impact.

Goals above expected is the raw goals-minus-xG rate, without the shrinkage used in the older finishing comparison. On-ice measures include teammates, opponents and deployment. These recorded metrics describe different quantities from the adjusted Season score components beside them.

Skaters need 20 appearances and 300 five-on-five minutes; quality and finishing also need 75 unblocked attempts. Early in a season these minimums scale down with games played so far. At least 30 peers must qualify. Playoff ranks are withheld. A reviewed axis whose own evidence fails is withheld and shown with its reason rather than ranked. These workload rules do not express statistical confidence.

Position uses the NHL listed primary position available now; it does not establish historical position or actual deployment. Broad groups are forwards, defence and goalies. This version uses the current model’s covered games only.

Season vs reference

Reference

Per game · all situations

Metric2022–23ReferenceDiff

0.440.41+0.03

0.590.38+0.22

1.040.79+0.25

3.063.27-0.21

Reference: 2021–22 · 80 games.

Season comparisons

Loading peer comparisons and model evidence…

Optional recent-history profile

Rolling Radar

Recent NHL history, carried across seasons. The radar compares this broader profile with a fixed position-group reference.

Rolling profile is currently unavailable.

Rolling Radar

Loading recent-history profile…

Results vs expected

Five-on-five · what happened beside the chances created and allowed

Chances	Player	Percentile	Rank
	3.91		3 / 11998th
	3.47		116 / 1193rd
	53.0		35 / 11971st

Player	Percentile	Rank
—	—	—
—	—	—
—	—	—

Player	Percentile	Rank
—	—	—
—	—	—
—	—	—

Context · not graded

5v5 goals: —
5v5 expected: 70.0–62.0
EPV added: +5.08

On ice vs off ice

Buffalo's share with Jeff Skinner on the ice against the same team without him.

Share	On ice and off ice	On-minus-off gap in percentage points
xGF%	On ice 53.0% · Off ice unavailable	—
CF%	On ice 54.5% · Off ice unavailable	—
GF%	On ice unavailable · Off ice unavailable	—

On iceOff ice

Scale 40–65% · marker at 50% · right column is the on-minus-off gap in points

Loading model evidence…

Defensive metrics

Five-on-five on-ice suppression; individual events in all situations.

Player	Percentile	Rank
55.54		56 / 11953rd
—	—	—
0.077		118 / 1191st

Player	Percentile	Rank
—	—	—
—	—	—
—	—	—

Physical style	Player	Percentile	Rank
	—	—	—
	—	—	—

Context · not graded

Evidence coverage: high danger 29 of 79 games.

Discipline & puck management

Recorded season event counts · all situations

Penaltiesnet —

Taken —Drawn —

Puck eventsnet —

Giveaways —Takeaways —

Blocks: —
Hits: —

Both penalty counts cover 32 of 79 games with every drawn role recorded.

Loading defensive evidence…

SituationChancesViewShot type

Shot map

All 330 attempts

Goal35Shot on goal207Missed shot88Blocked shot0Larger dot = higher xG

Shooting by zone

Hover a row to light it up · click to pin

Zone	Att	G	xG	Goal rate	Exp.	G−xG
Outer slot	43	8	3.6	18.6%	8.5%	+4.4
Right circle	24	3	1.0	12.5%	4.2%	+2.0
Left circle	19	1	0.6	5.3%	3.3%	+0.4
Inner slot	104	13	13.4	12.5%	12.9%	−0.4
Below goal line	10	0	0.7	0.0%	6.8%	−0.7
Point	31	0	0.8	0.0%	2.5%	−0.8
High slot	99	10	12.1	10.1%	12.3%	−2.1
All zones	330	35	32.3	10.6%	9.8%	+2.7

Finishing evidence. Scoring 10.6% on chances vs 9.8% expected (+0.8 points), led by outer slot volume and wrist finishing.

Sorted by goals minus expected goals. Goal rate is goals per unblocked attempt against the expected rate.

Shot profile

Context · not graded

On-net rate: 73.3%
Slot share: 61.5%
Average distance: 24.3 ft
Rebound attempts / 60: 1.83

Shot types

330 attempts

Type	Share	Sh%	G−xG
Wrist	49.4%	15.6%	+4.3
Snap	16.1%	13.9%	−2.0
Slap	12.4%	15.4%	+1.1
Backhand	11.5%	6.9%	−2.1
Tip-in	7.6%	11.8%	0.0
Deflected	1.5%	50.0%	+0.7
Other	1.5%	—	+0.6

Share is context, not a grade. Sh% counts shots on goal only.

High-danger chances

Model goal probability ≥ 0.20

Conversion18.5%−11.2 pts vs expected

Actual18.5%

Expected29.7%

Attempts: 27
Goals: 5
Expected goals: 8.0
G−xG: −3.0

Shot locations

Loading canonical shot events…

Usage by situation

Ice time, share of team ice time, scoring and scoring rate, with where shifts start.

Scope	TOI/GP	Team share	G	A	P	P/60
Five-on-five	13:35	—	25	31	56	3.13
Power play	3:14	—	8	13	21	4.94
Penalty kill	0:02	—	0	0	0	0.00
Other	0:34	—	2	3	5	6.74
All situations	17:24	—	35	47	82	3.58

Where the 82 points come from · All situations

Goals35 · 1.53/60
Primary assists— · —/60
Secondary assists— · —/60

Zone starts — offensive of OZ + DZ

Offensive —Neutral —Defensive —

Shifts

— a game · — average

Zone starts: five-on-five · Shifts: all situations

Faceoffs

All situations · zones are read from his side of the draw · values only; no peer ranks yet

Win %: 47.3%
Draws per game: 3.80
Offensive zone: 47.9%
Defensive zone: 42.9%
Power play: 48.7%

Usage by situation

Loading usage…

Power play

255:01 recorded ice time · peers need 100 minutes

Share of team PP: —
PP points: 21
Unit xGF / 60: 7.76

Player	Percentile	Rank
4.94		24 / 5759th
—	—	—
14.12		18 / 5770th
1.98		22 / 5763rd
7.76		33 / 5743rd
—	—	—

Evidence coverage: goals 12 of 79 games · team time 32 of 79 games.

Penalty kill

2:03 recorded ice time · peers need 100 minutes

Share of team PK: —
SH points: 0
Unit xGA / 60: 8.43

Player	Percentile	Rank
8.43		—
—	—	—
117.07		—
—	—	—
0.00		—

No rank yet

Evidence coverage: goals 1 of 8 games · high danger 1 of 8 games · team time 32 of 79 games.

Loading special teams…

Split	GP	G	A	P	P/GP	5v5 xG share	Team record
Venue
Home	40	19	22	41	1.02	53.4%	16–20–4
Away	39	16	25	41	1.05	52.6%	24–12–3
Rest
Back-to-back	14	10	9	19	1.36	56.5%	6–7–1
1 day of rest	45	13	26	39	0.87	51.7%	23–17–5
2+ days of rest	19	12	12	24	1.26	54.7%	10–8–1
Opponent
vs Eastern	49	20	28	48	0.98	51.7%	24–20–5
vs Western	30	15	19	34	1.13	54.9%	16–12–2
vs playoff teams	41	13	19	32	0.78	48.3%	16–22–3
vs non-playoff teams	38	22	28	50	1.32	57.6%	24–10–4
Recent
Last 10	10	4	8	12	1.20	53.7%	7–2–1

Split	G	A	P	5v5 xG share	5v5 CF%	5v5 GF–GA
Period
1st period	7	17	24	—	—	—
2nd period	17	15	32	—	—	—
3rd period	10	14	24	—	—	—
Overtime	1	1	2	—	—	—
Score state · 5v5 on ice
Leading	—	—	—	49.9%	47.6%	13–23
Tied	—	—	—	54.8%	54.0%	20–16
Trailing	—	—	—	52.9%	62.0%	15–15

Teammate	Pos	TOI together	xG share together	GF–GA	CF%	Him without	Teammate without
Tage Thompson	C	859:37	52.2%	39–45	54.4%	54.1%	49.1%
Alex Tuch	R	794:54	53.1%	39–44	54.7%	51.1%	47.6%
Rasmus Dahlin	D	540:28	52.1%	21–25	55.2%	53.0%	50.0%
Owen Power	D	459:12	51.7%	20–23	55.0%	53.3%	48.9%
Henri Jokiharju	D	297:17	52.3%	9–10	57.0%	52.7%	49.4%
Mattias Samuelsson	D	289:36	49.5%	20–19	49.5%	53.7%	47.9%
Ilya Lyubushkin	D	178:49	48.0%	9–13	48.7%	53.5%	46.8%
Jacob Bryson	D	169:21	55.9%	9–6	53.1%	52.1%	48.1%
Casey Mittelstadt	C	159:23	58.5%	8–7	58.1%	51.7%	49.4%
Kale Clague	D	114:04	60.7%	7–5	63.2%	51.7%	48.8%
Jack Quinn	R	103:29	53.9%	4–4	49.7%	52.4%	51.2%
Dylan Cozens	C	92:44	52.9%	1–2	50.4%	52.6%	49.4%

Season	GP	G	A	P	SOG	P/GP	5v5 ixG/60	5v5 GP
2024–25	5	1	1	2	9	0.40	0.91	5

	Opponent	Result		G	A		PPP	+/−	SOG		5v5 on-ice xG share	Game
Apr 14	@ CBJ	W 5–2	16:02	1	2	3	—	2	3	0.55	77.0%	View →
Apr 13	vs OTT	W 4–3 OT	16:54	0	3	3	—	1	4	0.47	62.8%	View →
Apr 11	@ NJD	L 2–6	16:09	1	0	1	0	-2	2	0.09	33.1%	View →
Apr 10	@ NYR	W 3–2 SO	20:23	0	0	0	—	1	4	0.23	42.0%	View →
Apr 8	vs CAR	W 4–3	18:45	0	2	2	—	2	6	0.45	58.5%	View →
Apr 6	@ DET	W 7–6 SO	16:52	0	0	0	—	0	3	0.01	42.9%	View →
Apr 4	@ FLA	L 1–2	17:54	0	0	0	—	-1	5	0.05	45.7%	View →
Apr 1	@ PHI	W 6–3	15:37	1	1	2	—	3	7	0.56	52.5%	View →
Mar 31	vs NYR	W 3–2 OT	16:52	1	0	1	—	1	4	0.49	58.9%	View →
Mar 27	vs MTL	OTL 3–4 SO	18:28	0	0	0	—	0	2	0.16	39.5%	View →
Filtered 10	—	7–2–1	17:24 avg	4	8	12	—	7	40	3.05	53.7%	—

Season	Box score · all situations	5v5 individual	5v5 on ice	Season performance
2025–26	33	SJS	32	6	7	13	-8	14	56	10.7	2	12:21	—	—	1.62	0.78	7.90	0.069	2.18	2.72	44.4	44.0	—	—	—	—
2024–25	32	EDM	72	16	13	29	1	26	144	11.1	0	13:00	—	—	—	—	—	0.078	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
2023–24	31	BUF	74	24	22	46	-2	34	211	11.4	8	16:00	—	—	2.02	0.98	9.40	0.073	2.98	3.02	49.7	51.3	—	—	—	—
2022–23	30	BUF	79	35	47	82	15	39	242	14.5	8	17:24	—	—	3.13	1.17	9.51	0.090	3.91	3.47	53.0	54.5	—	—	—	—
2021–22	29	BUF	80	33	30	63	-14	42	262	12.6	5	17:06	—	—	2.59	1.18	11.40	0.082	3.16	3.16	50.0	51.3	—	—	—	—
2020–21	28	BUF	53	7	7	14	-11	14	111	6.3	1	14:31	—	—	1.14	0.97	8.97	0.077	2.39	2.58	48.1	49.3	—	—	—	—
2019–20	27	BUF	59	14	9	23	-22	18	183	7.7	0	16:29	—	—	1.51	1.09	11.05	0.076	2.57	2.61	49.6	49.5	—	—	—	—
2018–19	26	BUF	82	40	23	63	0	36	268	14.9	8	18:31	—	—	2.08	1.04	9.72	0.080	2.96	2.83	51.1	52.3	—	—	—	—
2017–18	25	CAR	82	24	25	49	-27	34	277	8.7	4	16:42	—	—	1.89	1.15	11.21	0.075	2.98	2.46	54.8	55.1	—	—	—	—
2016–17	24	CAR	79	37	26	63	-3	28	281	13.2	7	17:44	—	—	2.16	1.22	11.00	0.083	2.78	2.83	49.5	51.3	—	—	—	—
2015–16	23	CAR	82	28	23	51	-2	38	258	10.9	4	16:17	—	—	2.11	1.15	10.48	0.082	2.59	2.79	48.2	50.8	—	—	—	—
Career	—	11 seasons	774	264	232	496	-73	323	2293	11.5	47	16:19	—	—	—	—	—	0.080	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—

1 award records

Calder Memorial Trophy · 2010–11

Every metric name opens its definition; the full list lives in Metrics.

Traditional statistics cover all situations. Supporting five-on-five analyses use completed games, raw adjustment and exposure from xG model v4. The two samples can differ.

An em dash means unavailable, not zero. A partial season remains partial. Where a panel reports evidence coverage, its rates use only the covered games. History never substitutes a different model, and a missing appearance interrupts a rolling model window.

Shot maps use the same shot model as Game Center and show which model version scored recent shots beside the rink. Older seasons can use earlier model versions. High danger means a model scoring probability of at least 0.20 on an unblocked attempt; for goalies, medium danger is 0.08 to 0.20 and low is below 0.08.

Special-team buckets include the wider recorded man-advantage and man-down states, read from the player’s own team; for a goalie, penalty kill means facing a power play. Their ranks need 100 recorded minutes and at least 30 qualified peers; below 100 minutes, penalty-kill percentiles are provisional. Playoff values have no ranks or percentiles. Team share is player ice time divided by team ice time in that situation, over the games the player dressed. Zone starts describe faceoff-started five-on-five shifts and exclude on-the-fly starts.

Penalties count events, including one for a double minor; bench and served-by roles are excluded, and victimless infractions have no drawn role. EPV added sums changes in the probability that the possessing team scores next; it is not standings points or an isolated player grade. Rolling windows never cross seasons or season types, and a missed game is not a zero-performance appearance. Career rates use summed counts and exposure, never an average of season rates; a missing contributing season withholds its career metric, and Performance begins in 2023–24.

Explore the full methodology →

Season			Box score · all situations												5v5 individual				5v5 on ice					Season performance
Season	Age	Team	GP	G	A	P	+/−	PIM	SOG	Sh%	PPG	TOI/GP	Hits	Blk	P/60	ixG/60	SOG/60	xG/UA	xGF/60	xGA/60	xGF%	CF%	GF%	Perf/60	Grade	Rank
2025–26	33	SJS	32	6	7	13	-8	14	56	10.7	2	12:21	—	—	1.62	0.78	7.90	0.069	2.18	2.72	44.4	44.0	—	—	—	—
2024–25	32	EDM	72	16	13	29	1	26	144	11.1	0	13:00	—	—	—	—	—	0.078	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
2023–24	31	BUF	74	24	22	46	-2	34	211	11.4	8	16:00	—	—	2.02	0.98	9.40	0.073	2.98	3.02	49.7	51.3	—	—	—	—
2022–23	30	BUF	79	35	47	82	15	39	242	14.5	8	17:24	—	—	3.13	1.17	9.51	0.090	3.91	3.47	53.0	54.5	—	—	—	—
2021–22	29	BUF	80	33	30	63	-14	42	262	12.6	5	17:06	—	—	2.59	1.18	11.40	0.082	3.16	3.16	50.0	51.3	—	—	—	—
2020–21	28	BUF	53	7	7	14	-11	14	111	6.3	1	14:31	—	—	1.14	0.97	8.97	0.077	2.39	2.58	48.1	49.3	—	—	—	—
2019–20	27	BUF	59	14	9	23	-22	18	183	7.7	0	16:29	—	—	1.51	1.09	11.05	0.076	2.57	2.61	49.6	49.5	—	—	—	—
2018–19	26	BUF	82	40	23	63	0	36	268	14.9	8	18:31	—	—	2.08	1.04	9.72	0.080	2.96	2.83	51.1	52.3	—	—	—	—
2017–18	25	CAR	82	24	25	49	-27	34	277	8.7	4	16:42	—	—	1.89	1.15	11.21	0.075	2.98	2.46	54.8	55.1	—	—	—	—
2016–17	24	CAR	79	37	26	63	-3	28	281	13.2	7	17:44	—	—	2.16	1.22	11.00	0.083	2.78	2.83	49.5	51.3	—	—	—	—
2015–16	23	CAR	82	28	23	51	-2	38	258	10.9	4	16:17	—	—	2.11	1.15	10.48	0.082	2.59	2.79	48.2	50.8	—	—	—	—
Career	—	11 seasons	774	264	232	496	-73	323	2293	11.5	47	16:19	—	—	—	—	—	0.080	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—

Jeff Skinner

Season performanceSelected-season standing and the components behind the scoreCollapse

Season metrics

Season vs reference

Season comparisons

Rolling Radar

Rolling Radar

On-ice impact5v5Strong 53.0% on-ice expected goal share at five-on-five (35th of 119)What the team creates and allows during the player’s five-on-five minutesExplore

Results vs expected

On ice vs off ice

Defense5v5 · AllPoor 3.47 on-ice expected goals against per 60 (116th of 119)On-ice suppression and individual disciplineExplore

Defensive metrics

Discipline & puck management

Penaltiesnet —

Puck eventsnet —

Shooting & finishingElite 1.17 individual expected goals per 60 (11th of 119)Where the player shoots, the quality of those chances, and actual versus expected goalsExplore

Shot map

Shooting by zone

Shot profile

Shot types

High-danger chances

Shot locations

Usage & deployment17:24 TOI per game (13:35 at five-on-five · 3:14 PP · 0:02 PK)Scoring by situation, zone starts and workloadExplore

Usage by situation

Where the 82 points come from · All situations

Zone starts — offensive of OZ + DZ

Shifts

Faceoffs

Usage by situation

Special teamsPP · PKAverage 4.94 power-play points per 60 (24th of 57)Power play and penalty killExplore

Power play

Penalty kill

FormExplore

Rolling Radar

Splits1.02 points per game at home · 1.05 awayVenue, rest and opponentExplore

By period and score state

Linemates5v5Most often with Tage Thompson: 860 five-on-five minutes, 52.2% xG share togetherWho he plays with at five-on-fiveExplore

PlayoffsDid not play in these playoffs · 5 career playoff gamesExplore

Every playoff run

Game log79 games · most recent at CBJ, W 5–2: 1 G, 2 AOfficial totals and five-on-five evidenceExplore

Career11 NHL seasons: 774 games, 496 pointsEvery season and a recomputed career lineExplore

Data notesScopes, missing values and model evidenceExplore

Every playoff run

Defensive metrics

Discipline & puck management

Penaltiesnet —

Puck eventsnet —

Power play

Penalty kill

Results vs expected

On ice vs off ice

Shot map

Shooting by zone

Shot profile

Shot types

High-danger chances

Usage by situation

Where the 82 points come from · All situations

Zone starts — offensive of OZ + DZ

Shifts

Faceoffs

By period and score state

Season metrics

Season vs reference