Sean Couturier

Philadelphia Flyers#14Center Shoots left

Age 33 · 6′4″ · 210 lb · Phoenix, Arizona, USA

No checked season results are available for this selection.

Games80T-143rd in NHL

Goals330.41/GP▲0.03T-30th in NHL

Assists430.54/GP▼0.01T-45th in NHL

Points760.95/GP▲0.02T-33rd in NHL…

5v5 xG share51.7%68th of 197…

Avg TOI22:0855th in NHL…

Career awards

No checked season results are available for this selection.

No complete checked component breakdown is available for this selection.

Loading season standing and profile…

Season metrics

2018–19 · five-on-five · vs 197 positional peers

Player	Percentile	Rank
2.08		34 / 19783rd
1.01		20 / 19790th
—	—	—

Shooting & finishing	Player	Percentile	Rank
	0.69		82 / 19759th
	7.34		60 / 19770th
	12.45		58 / 19771st
	0.069		114 / 16431st
	0.32		12 / 16493rd

Elite90+Strong70–89Average30–69Weak10–29Poor<10Bar length is the peer percentile, so longer is always better · tick at the 50th

How to read these comparisons

Player values are recorded season results. Peer averages are arithmetic means of qualified players in the selected group; each row uses the same peers for its average and rank. Ranks use unrounded values, with tied players sharing a rank and the next rank skipped. Lower xG against ranks better. Bar colours are the five performance tiers; context rows are blue and not graded. Differences from the average describe the season, not isolated player impact.

Goals above expected is the raw goals-minus-xG rate, without the shrinkage used in the older finishing comparison. On-ice measures include teammates, opponents and deployment. These recorded metrics describe different quantities from the adjusted Season score components beside them.

Skaters need 20 appearances and 300 five-on-five minutes; quality and finishing also need 75 unblocked attempts. Early in a season these minimums scale down with games played so far. At least 30 peers must qualify. Playoff ranks are withheld. A reviewed axis whose own evidence fails is withheld and shown with its reason rather than ranked. These workload rules do not express statistical confidence.

Position uses the NHL listed primary position available now; it does not establish historical position or actual deployment. Broad groups are forwards, defence and goalies. This version uses the current model’s covered games only.

Season vs reference

Reference

Per game · all situations

Metric2018–19ReferenceDiff

0.410.38+0.03

0.540.55-0.01

0.950.93+0.02

2.792.77+0.02

Reference: 2017–18 · 82 games.

Season comparisons

Loading peer comparisons and model evidence…

Optional recent-history profile

Rolling Radar

Recent NHL history, carried across seasons. The radar compares this broader profile with a fixed position-group reference.

Rolling profile is currently unavailable.

Rolling Radar

Loading recent-history profile…

Results vs expected

Five-on-five · what happened beside the chances created and allowed

Chances	Player	Percentile	Rank
	2.66		67 / 19766th
	2.48		92 / 19754th
	51.7		68 / 19766th

Player	Percentile	Rank
—	—	—
—	—	—
—	—	—

Player	Percentile	Rank
—	—	—
—	—	—
—	—	—

Context · not graded

5v5 goals: —
5v5 expected: 55.1–51.4
EPV added: +3.03

On ice vs off ice

Philadelphia's share with Sean Couturier on the ice against the same team without him.

Share	On ice and off ice	On-minus-off gap in percentage points
xGF%	On ice 51.7% · Off ice unavailable	—
CF%	On ice 52.8% · Off ice unavailable	—
GF%	On ice unavailable · Off ice unavailable	—

On iceOff ice

Scale 40–65% · marker at 50% · right column is the on-minus-off gap in points

Loading model evidence…

Defensive metrics

Five-on-five on-ice suppression; individual events in all situations.

Player	Percentile	Rank
55.40		79 / 19760th
—	—	—
0.061		126 / 19736th

Player	Percentile	Rank
—	—	—
—	—	—
—	—	—

Physical style	Player	Percentile	Rank
	—	—	—
	—	—	—

Context · not graded

Evidence coverage: high danger 28 of 80 games.

Discipline & puck management

Recorded season event counts · all situations

Penaltiesnet —

Taken —Drawn —

Puck eventsnet —

Giveaways —Takeaways —

Blocks: —
Hits: —

Both penalty counts cover 32 of 80 games with every drawn role recorded.

Loading defensive evidence…

SituationChancesViewShot type

Shot map

All 318 attempts

Goal33Shot on goal190Missed shot95Blocked shot0Larger dot = higher xG

Shooting by zone

Hover a row to light it up · click to pin

Zone	Att	G	xG	Goal rate	Exp.	G−xG
Inner slot	92	17	12.7	18.5%	13.8%	+4.3
High slot	114	12	9.8	10.5%	8.6%	+2.2
Point	49	3	1.7	6.1%	3.5%	+1.3
Below goal line	1	0	0.0	0.0%	2.6%	0.0
Outer slot	20	1	1.1	5.0%	5.6%	−0.1
Right circle	18	0	0.3	0.0%	1.9%	−0.3
Left circle	24	0	0.4	0.0%	1.9%	−0.4
All zones	318	33	26.2	10.4%	8.2%	+6.8

Finishing evidence. Scoring 10.4% on chances vs 8.2% expected (+2.2 points), led by inner slot volume and tip-in finishing.

Sorted by goals minus expected goals. Goal rate is goals per unblocked attempt against the expected rate.

Shot profile

Context · not graded

On-net rate: 70.1%
Slot share: 64.8%
Average distance: 28.0 ft
Rebound attempts / 60: 0.68

Shot types

318 attempts

Type	Share	Sh%	G−xG
Wrist	53.5%	11.6%	+1.2
Tip-in	15.4%	24.0%	+1.9
Snap	14.5%	14.7%	+0.8
Backhand	7.2%	17.6%	+1.1
Deflected	6.3%	27.3%	+1.1
Slap	3.1%	14.3%	+0.7

Share is context, not a grade. Sh% counts shots on goal only.

High-danger chances

Model goal probability ≥ 0.20

Conversion33.3%+4.7 pts vs expected

Actual33.3%

Expected28.6%

Attempts: 18
Goals: 6
Expected goals: 5.1
G−xG: +0.9

Shot locations

Loading canonical shot events…

Usage by situation

Ice time, share of team ice time, scoring and scoring rate, with where shifts start.

Scope	TOI/GP	Team share	G	A	P	P/60
Five-on-five	15:32	—	21	22	43	2.08
Power play	3:06	—	8	10	18	4.37
Penalty kill	2:18	—	1	0	1	0.33
Other	1:12	—	4	11	15	9.39
All situations	22:08	—	34	43	77	2.61

Where the 77 points come from · All situations

Goals34 · 1.15/60
Primary assists— · —/60
Secondary assists— · —/60

Zone starts — offensive of OZ + DZ

Offensive —Neutral —Defensive —

Shifts

— a game · — average

Zone starts: five-on-five · Shifts: all situations

Faceoffs

All situations · zones are read from his side of the draw · values only; no peer ranks yet

Win %: 57.1%
Draws per game: 16.54
Offensive zone: 54.3%
Defensive zone: 58.1%
Power play: 71.7%

Usage by situation

Loading usage…

Power play

247:20 recorded ice time · peers need 100 minutes

Share of team PP: —
PP points: 18
Unit xGF / 60: 7.94

Player	Percentile	Rank
4.37		45 / 10859th
—	—	—
9.95		51 / 10853rd
1.73		30 / 10873rd
7.94		19 / 10883rd
—	—	—

Evidence coverage: goals 21 of 78 games · team time 31 of 80 games.

Penalty kill

183:45 recorded ice time · peers need 100 minutes

Share of team PK: —
SH points: 1
Unit xGA / 60: 6.64

Player	Percentile	Rank
6.64		42 / 6738th
—	—	—
89.80		20 / 6771st
—	—	—
0.85		48 / 6729th

Evidence coverage: goals 12 of 74 games · high danger 11 of 74 games · team time 31 of 80 games.

Loading special teams…

Split	GP	G	A	P	P/GP	5v5 xG share	Team record
Venue
Home	41	18	22	40	0.98	53.2%	19–18–4
Away	39	15	21	36	0.92	50.3%	17–18–4
Rest
Back-to-back	13	3	9	12	0.92	52.9%	6–7–0
1 day of rest	42	24	21	45	1.07	51.6%	18–20–4
2+ days of rest	24	6	13	19	0.79	52.3%	11–9–4
Opponent
vs Eastern	51	19	29	48	0.94	49.3%	21–26–4
vs Western	29	14	14	28	0.97	56.6%	15–10–4
vs playoff teams	44	16	20	36	0.82	47.3%	12–25–7
vs non-playoff teams	36	17	23	40	1.11	57.8%	24–11–1
Recent
Last 10	10	4	3	7	0.70	44.4%	2–8–0

Split	G	A	P	5v5 xG share	5v5 CF%	5v5 GF–GA
Period
1st period	8	10	18	—	—	—
2nd period	12	9	21	—	—	—
3rd period	12	22	34	—	—	—
Overtime	1	2	3	—	—	—
Score state · 5v5 on ice
Leading	—	—	—	45.4%	42.3%	11–15
Tied	—	—	—	47.6%	47.6%	9–15
Trailing	—	—	—	57.5%	60.1%	10–11

Teammate	Pos	TOI together	xG share together	GF–GA	CF%	Him without	Teammate without
Ivan Provorov	D	700:33	49.5%	18–23	49.7%	52.5%	45.4%
Claude Giroux	R	699:40	54.9%	18–22	56.3%	45.5%	39.6%
Jakub Voracek	R	606:28	48.3%	16–25	49.1%	53.5%	46.8%
Travis Sanheim	D	503:32	54.6%	15–15	52.7%	48.3%	46.2%
Oskar Lindblom	L	377:20	48.8%	14–17	49.0%	51.7%	53.9%
Robert Hagg	D	352:16	48.5%	8–11	48.9%	51.7%	44.7%
Travis Konecny	R	347:28	57.7%	5–10	57.0%	48.4%	46.4%
Shayne Gostisbehere	D	338:06	52.8%	5–13	55.2%	50.1%	48.7%
Radko Gudas	D	275:11	50.4%	6–6	50.0%	50.9%	49.7%
Wayne Simmonds	R	163:55	54.5%	5–3	51.9%	50.4%	49.3%
Andrew MacDonald	D	140:31	51.1%	5–8	53.0%	50.8%	46.1%
James van Riemsdyk	L	133:08	47.3%	1–3	51.1%	51.1%	42.3%

Season	GP	G	A	P	SOG	P/GP	5v5 ixG/60	5v5 GP
2025–26	10	1	3	4	22	0.40	0.83	10
2019–20	15	2	7	9	23	0.60	0.36	15
2017–18	5	5	4	9	14	1.80	1.31	5
2015–16	1	0	0	0	1	0.00	0.00	1

	Opponent	Result		G	A		PPP	+/−	SOG		5v5 on-ice xG share	Game
Apr 6	vs CAR	L 3–4	24:02	1	0	1	—	-2	4	0.08	62.9%	View →
Apr 4	@ STL	L 3–7	23:26	0	1	1	—	0	2	0.28	60.5%	View →
Apr 2	@ DAL	L 2–6	21:23	0	0	0	—	-1	4	0.14	89.0%	View →
Mar 31	vs NYR	L 0–3	19:56	0	0	0	—	-1	1	0.05	41.9%	View →
Mar 30	@ CAR	L 2–5	17:25	0	0	0	0	-1	3	0.22	31.6%	View →
Mar 27	vs TOR	W 5–4 SO	25:58	1	0	1	—	-2	7	0.18	31.5%	View →
Mar 24	@ WSH	L 1–3	23:27	0	0	0	—	-2	4	0.26	40.5%	View →
Mar 23	vs NYI	L 2–4	20:42	0	1	1	1	-3	0	0.00	32.2%	View →
Mar 21	@ CHI	W 3–1	22:06	1	1	2	0	2	1	0.00	53.2%	View →
Mar 19	vs MTL	L 1–3	22:33	1	0	1	1	-2	2	0.09	40.9%	View →
Filtered 10	—	2–8–0	22:06 avg	4	3	7	—	-12	28	1.31	44.4%	—

Season	Box score · all situations	5v5 individual	5v5 on ice	Season performance
2026–27	34	PHI	11	0	3	3	-2	4	13	0.0	0	17:01	20	3	0.84	0.61	4.61	0.097	2.13	3.09	40.9	46.3	—	—	—	—
2025–26	33	PHI	78	12	24	36	-5	30	119	10.1	0	16:39	—	—	1.57	0.65	5.12	0.076	2.37	2.14	52.6	49.6	—	—	—	—
2024–25	32	PHI	79	15	30	45	1	41	155	9.7	1	17:18	—	—	—	—	—	0.081	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
2023–24	31	PHI	74	11	27	38	-10	29	192	5.7	3	17:49	—	—	1.53	0.68	8.30	0.062	2.62	2.31	53.1	56.8	—	—	—	—
2021–22	29	PHI	29	6	11	17	-6	14	79	7.6	2	20:24	—	—	1.01	0.72	8.34	0.071	2.76	2.55	52.0	54.7	—	—	—	—
2020–21	28	PHI	45	18	23	41	-4	8	120	15.0	3	19:20	—	—	2.45	0.78	8.41	0.070	2.49	2.25	52.6	59.2	—	—	—	—
2019–20	27	PHI	69	22	37	59	21	30	185	11.9	4	19:50	—	—	2.28	0.80	7.10	0.083	2.68	2.27	54.2	56.1	—	—	—	—
2018–19	26	PHI	80	33	43	76	2	34	223	14.8	8	22:08	—	—	2.08	0.69	7.34	0.069	2.66	2.48	51.7	52.8	—	—	—	—
2017–18	25	PHI	82	31	45	76	34	31	227	13.7	7	21:36	—	—	2.08	0.71	6.58	0.078	2.60	2.36	52.5	53.4	—	—	—	—
2016–17	24	PHI	66	14	20	34	12	33	120	11.7	0	18:27	—	—	1.76	0.75	6.63	0.086	2.71	2.40	53.0	54.6	—	—	—	—
2015–16	23	PHI	63	11	28	39	8	30	119	9.2	2	18:36	—	—	2.03	0.51	5.59	0.070	2.44	1.91	56.1	54.5	—	—	—	—
Career	—	11 seasons	676	173	291	464	51	284	1552	11.1	30	19:08	—	—	—	—	—	0.075	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—

1 award records

Frank J. Selke Trophy · 2019–20

Every metric name opens its definition; the full list lives in Metrics.

Traditional statistics cover all situations. Supporting five-on-five analyses use completed games, raw adjustment and exposure from xG model v4. The two samples can differ.

An em dash means unavailable, not zero. A partial season remains partial. Where a panel reports evidence coverage, its rates use only the covered games. History never substitutes a different model, and a missing appearance interrupts a rolling model window.

Shot maps use the same shot model as Game Center and show which model version scored recent shots beside the rink. Older seasons can use earlier model versions. High danger means a model scoring probability of at least 0.20 on an unblocked attempt; for goalies, medium danger is 0.08 to 0.20 and low is below 0.08.

Special-team buckets include the wider recorded man-advantage and man-down states, read from the player’s own team; for a goalie, penalty kill means facing a power play. Their ranks need 100 recorded minutes and at least 30 qualified peers; below 100 minutes, penalty-kill percentiles are provisional. Playoff values have no ranks or percentiles. Team share is player ice time divided by team ice time in that situation, over the games the player dressed. Zone starts describe faceoff-started five-on-five shifts and exclude on-the-fly starts.

Penalties count events, including one for a double minor; bench and served-by roles are excluded, and victimless infractions have no drawn role. EPV added sums changes in the probability that the possessing team scores next; it is not standings points or an isolated player grade. Rolling windows never cross seasons or season types, and a missed game is not a zero-performance appearance. Career rates use summed counts and exposure, never an average of season rates; a missing contributing season withholds its career metric, and Performance begins in 2023–24.

Explore the full methodology →

Season			Box score · all situations												5v5 individual				5v5 on ice					Season performance
Season	Age	Team	GP	G	A	P	+/−	PIM	SOG	Sh%	PPG	TOI/GP	Hits	Blk	P/60	ixG/60	SOG/60	xG/UA	xGF/60	xGA/60	xGF%	CF%	GF%	Perf/60	Grade	Rank
2026–27	34	PHI	11	0	3	3	-2	4	13	0.0	0	17:01	20	3	0.84	0.61	4.61	0.097	2.13	3.09	40.9	46.3	—	—	—	—
2025–26	33	PHI	78	12	24	36	-5	30	119	10.1	0	16:39	—	—	1.57	0.65	5.12	0.076	2.37	2.14	52.6	49.6	—	—	—	—
2024–25	32	PHI	79	15	30	45	1	41	155	9.7	1	17:18	—	—	—	—	—	0.081	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
2023–24	31	PHI	74	11	27	38	-10	29	192	5.7	3	17:49	—	—	1.53	0.68	8.30	0.062	2.62	2.31	53.1	56.8	—	—	—	—
2021–22	29	PHI	29	6	11	17	-6	14	79	7.6	2	20:24	—	—	1.01	0.72	8.34	0.071	2.76	2.55	52.0	54.7	—	—	—	—
2020–21	28	PHI	45	18	23	41	-4	8	120	15.0	3	19:20	—	—	2.45	0.78	8.41	0.070	2.49	2.25	52.6	59.2	—	—	—	—
2019–20	27	PHI	69	22	37	59	21	30	185	11.9	4	19:50	—	—	2.28	0.80	7.10	0.083	2.68	2.27	54.2	56.1	—	—	—	—
2018–19	26	PHI	80	33	43	76	2	34	223	14.8	8	22:08	—	—	2.08	0.69	7.34	0.069	2.66	2.48	51.7	52.8	—	—	—	—
2017–18	25	PHI	82	31	45	76	34	31	227	13.7	7	21:36	—	—	2.08	0.71	6.58	0.078	2.60	2.36	52.5	53.4	—	—	—	—
2016–17	24	PHI	66	14	20	34	12	33	120	11.7	0	18:27	—	—	1.76	0.75	6.63	0.086	2.71	2.40	53.0	54.6	—	—	—	—
2015–16	23	PHI	63	11	28	39	8	30	119	9.2	2	18:36	—	—	2.03	0.51	5.59	0.070	2.44	1.91	56.1	54.5	—	—	—	—
Career	—	11 seasons	676	173	291	464	51	284	1552	11.1	30	19:08	—	—	—	—	—	0.075	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—

Sean Couturier

Season performanceSelected-season standing and the components behind the scoreCollapse

Season metrics

Season vs reference

Season comparisons

Rolling Radar

Rolling Radar

On-ice impact5v5Average 51.7% on-ice expected goal share at five-on-five (68th of 197)What the team creates and allows during the player’s five-on-five minutesExplore

Results vs expected

On ice vs off ice

Defense5v5 · AllAverage 2.48 on-ice expected goals against per 60 (92nd of 197)On-ice suppression and individual disciplineExplore

Defensive metrics

Discipline & puck management

Penaltiesnet —

Puck eventsnet —

Shooting & finishingAverage 0.69 individual expected goals per 60 (82nd of 197)Where the player shoots, the quality of those chances, and actual versus expected goalsExplore

Shot map

Shooting by zone

Shot profile

Shot types

High-danger chances

Shot locations

Usage & deployment22:08 TOI per game (15:32 at five-on-five · 3:06 PP · 2:18 PK)Scoring by situation, zone starts and workloadExplore

Usage by situation

Where the 77 points come from · All situations

Zone starts — offensive of OZ + DZ

Shifts

Faceoffs

Usage by situation

Special teamsPP · PKAverage 4.37 power-play points per 60 (45th of 108)Power play and penalty killExplore

Power play

Penalty kill

FormExplore

Rolling Radar

Splits0.98 points per game at home · 0.92 awayVenue, rest and opponentExplore

By period and score state

Linemates5v5Most often with Ivan Provorov: 701 five-on-five minutes, 49.5% xG share togetherWho he plays with at five-on-fiveExplore

PlayoffsDid not play in these playoffs · 31 career playoff gamesExplore

Every playoff run

Game log80 games · most recent vs CAR, L 3–4: 1 G, 0 AOfficial totals and five-on-five evidenceExplore

Career11 NHL seasons: 676 games, 464 pointsEvery season and a recomputed career lineExplore

Data notesScopes, missing values and model evidenceExplore

Every playoff run

Defensive metrics

Discipline & puck management

Penaltiesnet —

Puck eventsnet —

Power play

Penalty kill

Results vs expected

On ice vs off ice

Shot map

Shooting by zone

Shot profile

Shot types

High-danger chances

Usage by situation

Where the 77 points come from · All situations

Zone starts — offensive of OZ + DZ

Shifts

Faceoffs

By period and score state

Season metrics

Season vs reference