Jonathan Marchessault

Nashville Predators#81Center Shoots right

Age 35 · 5′9″ · 185 lb · Cap-Rouge, QC, CAN

Season grade: Withheld; Incomplete data; Performance / 60−0.1426/78 GP

Games78T-229th in NHL

Goals210.27/GP▼0.24T-113th in NHL

Assists350.45/GP▲0.12T-85th in NHL

Points560.72/GPT-101st in NHL…

5v5 xG share—…

Avg TOI17:59T-245th in NHL…

Career awards

Not qualified · 2024–25 forwards

Playing-time minimum met. Rank withheld because the app’s scoring data are incomplete. The app has checked scoring results for 26 of 30 appearances (86.7%); season standings require at least 90%. Scoring data cover less than 90% of recorded workload or could not be verified.

Percentiles appear once this player qualifies for season standings. The score breakdown is under How this is calculated.

How this is calculated

Score breakdown

Component	Weight	Scaled	Contribution
Offense	25%	−0.017	−0.004
Defense	25%	−0.250	−0.062
Chance creation	20%	−0.051	−0.010
Finishing	10%	−0.063	−0.006
Assisting	20%	−0.260	−0.052
Performance rate			−0.135

Per 60 rated minutes, over the scored appearances. Each component is scaled separately, then weighted; the contributions add to the performance rate at full precision, so rounded figures may differ.

Scoring

Season grade is the qualified peer percentile on the same letter bands as Game Grade — A+ ≥88, A ≥78, A− ≥68, B+ ≥58, B ≥50, B− ≥42, C+ ≥35, C ≥28, C− ≥22, D ≥15, F below 15 — and needs qualification plus at least 30 eligible peers. The letter describes this season’s performance, not permanent ability.

Comparisons

Rank and component percentiles compare this season’s qualified forwards on unrounded rates over every checked appearance; Game Grade compares one appearance with frozen historical games.

Component percentiles are never averaged into the score. Recent history is optional, from up to three completed prior seasons; small samples are provisional.

Coverage

Qualification: 16 covered appearances, 268.1 rated minutes, and 90% appearance and workload coverage. Minimums advance with league progress; valid low-sample results stay visible.

Rated minutes exclude play with a goalie pulled: 7.4 min excluded; official TOI 466.2 min.

Coverage: partial. Updated Oct 17, 2026.

Method

Five weighted components add to the performance rate. Five-on-five offense and defense account for recorded teammates, opponents and game state, so shared on-ice results are not isolated individual ability. Finishing is scored against the shot model’s historical-shooter expectation and assisting counts primary assists plus half of secondary assists; both use the strength baseline, chance creation its positional baseline.

Loading season standing and profile…

Season metrics

2024–25 · five-on-five · vs 28 positional peers

Player	Percentile	Rank
—	—	—
—	—	—
—	—	—

Player	Percentile	Rank
—	—	—
—	—	—
—	—	—
0.079		—
—	—	—

Elite90+Strong70–89Average30–69Weak10–29Poor<10No rank yetBar length is the peer percentile, so longer is always better · tick at the 50th

How to read these comparisons

Player values are recorded season results. Peer averages are arithmetic means of qualified players in the selected group; each row uses the same peers for its average and rank. Ranks use unrounded values, with tied players sharing a rank and the next rank skipped. Lower xG against ranks better. Bar colours are the five performance tiers; context rows are blue and not graded. Differences from the average describe the season, not isolated player impact.

Goals above expected is the raw goals-minus-xG rate, without the shrinkage used in the older finishing comparison. On-ice measures include teammates, opponents and deployment. These recorded metrics describe different quantities from the adjusted Season score components beside them.

Skaters need 20 appearances and 300 five-on-five minutes; quality and finishing also need 75 unblocked attempts. Early in a season these minimums scale down with games played so far. At least 30 peers must qualify. Playoff ranks are withheld. A reviewed axis whose own evidence fails is withheld and shown with its reason rather than ranked. These workload rules do not express statistical confidence.

Position uses the NHL listed primary position available now; it does not establish historical position or actual deployment. Broad groups are forwards, defence and goalies. This version uses the current model’s covered games only.

Season vs reference

Reference

Per game · all situations

Metric2024–25ReferenceDiff

0.270.51-0.24

0.450.33+0.12

0.720.84-0.12

2.643.24-0.60

Reference: 2023–24 · 82 games.

Season comparisons

Loading peer comparisons and model evidence…

Optional recent-history profile

Rolling Radar

Recent NHL history, carried across seasons. The radar compares this broader profile with a fixed position-group reference.

Rolling profile is currently unavailable.

Rolling Radar

Loading recent-history profile…

Results vs expected

Five-on-five · what happened beside the chances created and allowed

Player	Percentile	Rank
—	—	—
—	—	—
—	—	—

Player	Percentile	Rank
—	—	—
—	—	—
—	—	—

Player	Percentile	Rank
—	—	—
—	—	—
—	—	—

Context · not graded

5v5 goals: —
5v5 expected: —
EPV added: +2.52

On ice vs off ice

Nashville's share with Jonathan Marchessault on the ice against the same team without him.

Share	On ice and off ice	On-minus-off gap in percentage points
xGF%	On ice unavailable · Off ice unavailable	—
CF%	On ice unavailable · Off ice unavailable	—
GF%	On ice unavailable · Off ice unavailable	—

On iceOff ice

Scale 40–65% · marker at 50% · right column is the on-minus-off gap in points

Loading model evidence…

Defensive metrics

Five-on-five on-ice suppression; individual events in all situations.

Player	Percentile	Rank
—	—	—
—	—	—
—	—	—

Player	Percentile	Rank
—	—	—
—	—	—
—	—	—

Physical style	Player	Percentile	Rank
	—	—	—
	—	—	—

Context · not graded

Evidence coverage: high danger 47 of 74 games.

Discipline & puck management

Recorded season event counts · all situations

Penaltiesnet —

Taken —Drawn —

Puck eventsnet —

Giveaways —Takeaways —

Blocks: —
Hits: —

Both penalty counts cover 48 of 78 games with every drawn role recorded.

Loading defensive evidence…

SituationChancesViewShot type

Shot map

All 277 attempts

Goal21Shot on goal185Missed shot71Blocked shot0Larger dot = higher xG

Shooting by zone

Hover a row to light it up · click to pin

Zone	Att	G	xG	Goal rate	Exp.	G−xG
Inner slot	76	15	11.6	19.7%	15.3%	+3.4
Left circle	4	0	0.1	0.0%	3.1%	−0.1
Below goal line	7	0	0.2	0.0%	2.4%	−0.2
Point	56	1	1.9	1.8%	3.4%	−0.9
Outer slot	24	0	2.0	0.0%	8.3%	−2.0
Right circle	41	0	2.0	0.0%	4.8%	−2.0
High slot	69	5	8.7	7.2%	12.5%	−3.7
All zones	277	21	26.4	7.6%	9.5%	−5.4

Finishing evidence. Scoring 7.6% on chances vs 9.5% expected (−2.0 points), with the largest shortfall in the high slot.

Sorted by goals minus expected goals. Goal rate is goals per unblocked attempt against the expected rate.

Shot profile

Context · not graded

On-net rate: 74.4%
Slot share: 52.3%
Average distance: 29.3 ft
Rebound attempts / 60: 0.98

Shot types

277 attempts

Type	Share	Sh%	G−xG
Wrist	53.8%	12.3%	+0.1
Snap	15.9%	5.3%	−4.0
Backhand	11.9%	0.0%	−2.6
Slap	8.7%	6.7%	−0.7
Tip-in	5.1%	42.9%	+1.6
Other	2.5%	—	+0.3
Wrap-around	2.2%	0.0%	−0.2

Share is context, not a grade. Sh% counts shots on goal only.

High-danger chances

Model goal probability ≥ 0.20

Conversion37.0%+5.3 pts vs expected

Actual37.0%

Expected31.8%

Attempts: 27
Goals: 10
Expected goals: 8.6
G−xG: +1.4

Shot locations

Loading canonical shot events…

Usage by situation

Ice time, share of team ice time, scoring and scoring rate, with where shifts start.

Scope	TOI/GP	Team share	G	A	P	P/60
Five-on-five	—	—	13	11	24	—
Power play	—	—	4	16	20	—
Penalty kill	—	—	0	0	0	—
Other	—	—	4	8	12	—
All situations	17:59	—	21	35	56	2.40

Where the 56 points come from · All situations

Goals21 · 0.90/60
Primary assists— · —/60
Secondary assists— · —/60

Zone starts — offensive of OZ + DZ

Offensive —Neutral —Defensive —

Shifts

— a game · — average

Zone starts: five-on-five · Shifts: all situations

Usage by situation

Loading usage…

Power play

— recorded ice time · peers need 100 minutes

Share of team PP: —
PP points: 20
Unit xGF / 60: —

Player	Percentile	Rank
—	—	—
—	—	—
—	—	—
—	—	—
—	—	—
—	—	—

Evidence coverage: goals 22 of 72 games · team time 48 of 78 games.

Penalty kill

— recorded ice time · peers need 100 minutes

Share of team PK: —
SH points: 0
Unit xGA / 60: —

Player	Percentile	Rank
—	—	—
—	—	—
—	—	—
—	—	—
—	—	—

Evidence coverage: goals 4 of 8 games · high danger 4 of 8 games · team time 48 of 78 games.

Loading special teams…

Split	GP	G	A	P	P/GP	5v5 xG share	Team record
Venue
Home	40	16	23	39	0.97	49.5%	20–17–3
Away	38	5	12	17	0.45	50.6%	10–23–5
Rest
Back-to-back	13	3	4	7	0.54	56.2%	3–8–2
1 day of rest	40	10	17	27	0.68	44.4%	17–18–5
2+ days of rest	24	8	12	20	0.83	56.4%	10–13–1
Opponent
vs Eastern	29	9	10	19	0.66	48.5%	9–16–4
vs Western	49	12	25	37	0.76	51.1%	21–24–4
vs playoff teams	42	12	15	27	0.64	47.7%	12–24–6
vs non-playoff teams	36	9	20	29	0.81	53.0%	18–16–2
Recent
Last 10	10	2	5	7	0.70	39.0%	5–5–0

Split	G	A	P	5v5 xG share	5v5 CF%	5v5 GF–GA
Period
1st period	6	5	11	—	—	—
2nd period	5	18	23	—	—	—
3rd period	9	12	21	—	—	—
Overtime	1	0	1	—	—	—
Score state · 5v5 on ice
Leading	—	—	—	42.5%	38.3%	6–13
Tied	—	—	—	46.8%	46.6%	14–14
Trailing	—	—	—	56.8%	57.1%	9–14

Teammate	Pos	TOI together	xG share together	GF–GA	CF%	Him without	Teammate without
Steven Stamkos	C	567:12	49.9%	12–24	47.2%	49.3%	45.6%
Filip Forsberg	L	501:49	49.0%	15–23	46.6%	50.2%	47.4%
Brady Skjei	D	364:31	46.4%	10–15	46.5%	51.5%	48.8%
Roman Josi	D	344:04	54.3%	12–9	52.8%	47.1%	52.1%
Nick Blankenburg	D	233:22	40.5%	3–14	43.9%	52.0%	52.2%
Luke Schenn	D	217:20	52.1%	9–9	47.3%	48.9%	51.3%
Ryan O'Reilly	C	200:38	50.3%	5–5	50.4%	49.4%	50.9%
Colton Sissons	C	188:54	49.4%	6–7	45.3%	49.7%	51.1%
Justin Barron	D	186:05	55.6%	4–6	53.8%	48.3%	52.9%
Marc Del Gaizo	D	165:39	42.9%	5–8	41.8%	51.0%	51.8%
Tommy Novak	C	145:15	52.8%	8–4	57.0%	49.1%	57.9%
Alexandre Carrier	D	112:27	58.7%	5–5	50.0%	48.6%	42.1%

Season	GP	G	A	P	SOG	P/GP	5v5 ixG/60	5v5 GP
2023–24	7	2	2	4	25	0.57	0.82	7
2022–23	22	13	12	25	80	1.14	1.16	22
2020–21	19	6	3	9	51	0.47	0.72	19
2019–20	20	3	7	10	57	0.50	0.98	20
2018–19	7	4	2	6	26	0.86	0.94	7
2017–18	20	8	13	21	86	1.05	0.99	20
2015–16	5	0	1	1	7	0.20	0.82	5

	Opponent	Result		G	A		PPP	+/−	SOG		5v5 on-ice xG share	Game
Apr 16	vs DAL	W 5–1	13:54	1	1	2	—	0	1	0.08	36.0%	View →
Apr 14	vs UTA	L 3–7	15:50	0	0	0	—	0	3	0.04	—	View →
Apr 12	@ VGK	L 3–5	17:01	1	0	1	—	-2	1	0.55	—	View →
Apr 10	@ UTA	W 4–3 SO	18:17	0	1	1	—	-1	1	0.10	—	View →
Apr 8	vs NYI	W 7–6 OT	18:32	0	3	3	—	0	3	0.07	—	View →
Mar 29	vs VGK	L 1–3	16:21	0	0	0	0	-1	1	0.03	47.9%	View →
Mar 27	vs STL	L 2–3	17:07	0	0	0	—	-2	0	0.05	29.6%	View →
Mar 25	@ CAR	W 3–1	15:16	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.01	27.3%	View →
Mar 23	@ STL	L 1–4	17:34	0	0	0	0	-1	3	0.29	60.6%	View →
Mar 22	vs TOR	W 5–2	15:59	0	0	0	0	0	2	0.00	29.3%	View →
Filtered 10	—	5–5–0	16:35 avg	2	5	7	—	-7	16	1.21	—	—

Season	Box score · all situations	5v5 individual	5v5 on ice	Season performance
2026–27	36	NSH	7	1	1	2	-2	4	12	8.3	1	16:49	—	—	—	—	—	0.047	—	—	—	—	20.0	—	—	—
2025–26	35	NSH	62	12	19	31	-18	30	132	9.1	4	16:42	—	—	1.63	0.47	5.94	0.052	2.33	3.14	42.6	45.8	—	—	—	—
2024–25	34	NSH	78	21	35	56	-29	37	206	10.2	4	17:59	—	—	—	—	—	0.079	—	—	—	—	—	-0.135	—	—
2023–24	33	VGK	82	42	27	69	-2	40	266	15.8	8	17:54	—	—	2.28	0.86	9.50	0.067	2.76	2.59	51.6	49.2	—	—	—	—
2022–23	32	VGK	76	28	29	57	2	21	234	12.0	9	17:08	—	—	1.94	0.89	9.36	0.070	2.95	2.68	52.4	50.4	—	—	—	—
2021–22	31	VGK	76	30	36	66	3	36	251	12.0	5	17:34	—	—	1.91	0.94	10.21	0.069	3.20	2.57	55.4	56.5	—	—	—	—
2020–21	30	VGK	55	18	26	44	19	39	176	10.2	3	17:25	—	—	2.51	0.87	9.16	0.067	3.10	2.41	56.3	56.1	—	—	—	—
2019–20	29	VGK	66	22	25	47	6	28	235	9.4	6	17:17	—	—	1.80	0.92	10.58	0.069	3.10	2.43	56.1	54.4	—	—	—	—
2018–19	28	VGK	82	25	34	59	2	52	278	9.0	5	18:09	—	—	1.85	0.89	10.26	0.066	3.03	2.47	55.1	52.9	—	—	—	—
2017–18	27	VGK	77	27	48	75	36	40	268	10.1	6	17:30	—	—	2.62	0.91	9.62	0.073	2.98	2.50	54.4	52.9	—	—	—	—
2016–17	26	FLA	75	30	21	51	-21	38	193	15.5	8	16:55	—	—	1.80	0.64	7.64	0.065	2.31	2.38	49.2	51.7	—	—	—	—
2015–16	25	TBL	45	7	11	18	-10	17	81	8.6	4	12:05	—	—	1.61	0.89	9.23	0.073	2.70	2.00	57.4	53.8	—	—	—	—
Career	—	12 seasons	781	263	312	575	-14	382	2332	11.3	63	17:10	—	—	—	—	—	0.068	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—

2 award records

Conn Smythe Trophy · 2022–23
Stanley Cup · 2022–23

Every metric name opens its definition; the full list lives in Metrics.

Traditional statistics cover all situations. Supporting five-on-five analyses use completed games, raw adjustment and exposure from xG model v4. The two samples can differ.

An em dash means unavailable, not zero. A partial season remains partial. Where a panel reports evidence coverage, its rates use only the covered games. History never substitutes a different model, and a missing appearance interrupts a rolling model window.

Shot maps use the same shot model as Game Center and show which model version scored recent shots beside the rink. Older seasons can use earlier model versions. High danger means a model scoring probability of at least 0.20 on an unblocked attempt; for goalies, medium danger is 0.08 to 0.20 and low is below 0.08.

Special-team buckets include the wider recorded man-advantage and man-down states, read from the player’s own team; for a goalie, penalty kill means facing a power play. Their ranks need 100 recorded minutes and at least 30 qualified peers; below 100 minutes, penalty-kill percentiles are provisional. Playoff values have no ranks or percentiles. Team share is player ice time divided by team ice time in that situation, over the games the player dressed. Zone starts describe faceoff-started five-on-five shifts and exclude on-the-fly starts.

Penalties count events, including one for a double minor; bench and served-by roles are excluded, and victimless infractions have no drawn role. EPV added sums changes in the probability that the possessing team scores next; it is not standings points or an isolated player grade. Rolling windows never cross seasons or season types, and a missed game is not a zero-performance appearance. Career rates use summed counts and exposure, never an average of season rates; a missing contributing season withholds its career metric, and Performance begins in 2023–24.

Explore the full methodology →

Season			Box score · all situations												5v5 individual				5v5 on ice					Season performance
Season	Age	Team	GP	G	A	P	+/−	PIM	SOG	Sh%	PPG	TOI/GP	Hits	Blk	P/60	ixG/60	SOG/60	xG/UA	xGF/60	xGA/60	xGF%	CF%	GF%	Perf/60	Grade	Rank
2026–27	36	NSH	7	1	1	2	-2	4	12	8.3	1	16:49	—	—	—	—	—	0.047	—	—	—	—	20.0	—	—	—
2025–26	35	NSH	62	12	19	31	-18	30	132	9.1	4	16:42	—	—	1.63	0.47	5.94	0.052	2.33	3.14	42.6	45.8	—	—	—	—
2024–25	34	NSH	78	21	35	56	-29	37	206	10.2	4	17:59	—	—	—	—	—	0.079	—	—	—	—	—	-0.135	—	—
2023–24	33	VGK	82	42	27	69	-2	40	266	15.8	8	17:54	—	—	2.28	0.86	9.50	0.067	2.76	2.59	51.6	49.2	—	—	—	—
2022–23	32	VGK	76	28	29	57	2	21	234	12.0	9	17:08	—	—	1.94	0.89	9.36	0.070	2.95	2.68	52.4	50.4	—	—	—	—
2021–22	31	VGK	76	30	36	66	3	36	251	12.0	5	17:34	—	—	1.91	0.94	10.21	0.069	3.20	2.57	55.4	56.5	—	—	—	—
2020–21	30	VGK	55	18	26	44	19	39	176	10.2	3	17:25	—	—	2.51	0.87	9.16	0.067	3.10	2.41	56.3	56.1	—	—	—	—
2019–20	29	VGK	66	22	25	47	6	28	235	9.4	6	17:17	—	—	1.80	0.92	10.58	0.069	3.10	2.43	56.1	54.4	—	—	—	—
2018–19	28	VGK	82	25	34	59	2	52	278	9.0	5	18:09	—	—	1.85	0.89	10.26	0.066	3.03	2.47	55.1	52.9	—	—	—	—
2017–18	27	VGK	77	27	48	75	36	40	268	10.1	6	17:30	—	—	2.62	0.91	9.62	0.073	2.98	2.50	54.4	52.9	—	—	—	—
2016–17	26	FLA	75	30	21	51	-21	38	193	15.5	8	16:55	—	—	1.80	0.64	7.64	0.065	2.31	2.38	49.2	51.7	—	—	—	—
2015–16	25	TBL	45	7	11	18	-10	17	81	8.6	4	12:05	—	—	1.61	0.89	9.23	0.073	2.70	2.00	57.4	53.8	—	—	—	—
Career	—	12 seasons	781	263	312	575	-14	382	2332	11.3	63	17:10	—	—	—	—	—	0.068	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—

Jonathan Marchessault

Season performanceSelected-season standing and the components behind the scoreCollapse

Score breakdown

Scoring

Comparisons

Coverage

Method

Season metrics

Season vs reference

Season comparisons

Rolling Radar

Rolling Radar

On-ice impact5v5What the team creates and allows during the player’s five-on-five minutesWhat the team creates and allows during the player’s five-on-five minutesExplore

Results vs expected

On ice vs off ice

Defense5v5 · AllOn-ice suppression and individual disciplineOn-ice suppression and individual disciplineExplore

Defensive metrics

Discipline & puck management

Penaltiesnet —

Puck eventsnet —

Shooting & finishingWhere the player shoots, the quality of those chances, and actual versus expected goalsWhere the player shoots, the quality of those chances, and actual versus expected goalsExplore

Shot map

Shooting by zone

Shot profile

Shot types

High-danger chances

Shot locations

Usage & deployment17:59 TOI per gameScoring by situation, zone starts and workloadExplore

Usage by situation

Where the 56 points come from · All situations

Zone starts — offensive of OZ + DZ

Shifts

Usage by situation

Special teamsPP · PKPower play and penalty killPower play and penalty killExplore

Power play

Penalty kill

FormExplore

Rolling Radar

Splits0.97 points per game at home · 0.45 awayVenue, rest and opponentExplore

By period and score state

Linemates5v5Most often with Steven Stamkos: 567 five-on-five minutes, 49.9% xG share togetherWho he plays with at five-on-fiveExplore

PlayoffsDid not play in these playoffs · 100 career playoff gamesExplore

Every playoff run

Game log78 games · most recent vs DAL, W 5–1: 1 G, 1 AOfficial totals and five-on-five evidenceExplore

Career12 NHL seasons: 781 games, 575 pointsEvery season and a recomputed career lineExplore

Data notesScopes, missing values and model evidenceExplore

Every playoff run

Score breakdown

Scoring

Comparisons

Coverage

Method

Defensive metrics

Discipline & puck management

Penaltiesnet —

Puck eventsnet —

Power play

Penalty kill

Results vs expected

On ice vs off ice

Shot map

Shooting by zone

Shot profile

Shot types

High-danger chances

Usage by situation

Where the 56 points come from · All situations

Zone starts — offensive of OZ + DZ

Shifts

By period and score state

Season metrics

Season vs reference