Dallas Stars#12Center Shoots left
Age 32 · 6′3″ · 216 lb · Vitkov, CZE
Loading season standing and profile…
Loading peer comparisons and model evidence…
Loading recent-history profile…
Loading model evidence…
Loading defensive evidence…
Loading canonical shot events…
Loading usage…
Loading special teams…
Recent NHL history, carried across seasons. The radar compares this broader profile with a fixed position-group reference.
Bands show position percentiles; axis labels show current rolling values.
Dashed outline: average forward in the fixed reference. Outside = above average; inside = below average. All axes point outward for stronger results.
Player value: 1.91
Peer range: 1.68 – 4.20 xGF/60
Player 1.91 · mean 2.54. Higher raw values rank higher.
Rolling profile against a fixed reference group
Fixed rolling-profile reference · 430 players. Values use the same history and smoothing as the radar.
Higher radar percentiles mean stronger recorded results against the fixed reference, including older seasons. These are separate from this season’s league percentile. Each player has a different amount of covered history. Weighted minutes and attempts give recent games more influence. “Prior” is the share contributed by a frozen league baseline: it is higher when a player has less evidence, and differs by metric because each uses its own smoothing strength. It is not a confidence score.
History through Oct 14, 2026. Recent games count more than older games. History carries across seasons and stays unchanged while inactive. On-ice results are shared; finishing describes results rather than established talent.
| Zone | Shots | xG | Goals | S% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Inner slot | 5 | 0.4 | 0 | 0.0% |
| High slot | 3 | 0.3 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Point | 3 | 0.1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Left circle | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Outer slot | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0% |
Hover or focus a row to light up those attempts on the rink.
Finishing evidence. Scoring 0.0% on chances vs 5.9% expected (−5.9 points), with the largest shortfall in the inner slot.
6 high-danger attempts · Model is the expected conversion on those attempts.
Loading recent games…
Loading season comparison…
Loading playoff games…
Loading game log…
Loading career ledger…
Every metric name opens its definition; the full list lives in Metrics.
Traditional statistics cover all situations. Supporting five-on-five analyses use completed games, raw adjustment and exposure from xG model v4. The two samples can differ.
An em dash means unavailable, not zero. A partial season remains partial. Where a panel reports evidence coverage, its rates use only the covered games. History never substitutes a different model, and a missing appearance interrupts a rolling model window.
Shot maps use the same shot model as Game Center and show which model version scored recent shots beside the rink. Older seasons can use earlier model versions. High danger means a model scoring probability of at least 0.20 on an unblocked attempt; for goalies, medium danger is 0.08 to 0.20 and low is below 0.08.
Special-team buckets include the wider recorded man-advantage and man-down states, read from the player’s own team; for a goalie, penalty kill means facing a power play. Their ranks need 100 recorded minutes and at least 30 qualified peers; below 100 minutes, penalty-kill percentiles are provisional. Playoff values have no ranks or percentiles. Team share is player ice time divided by team ice time in that situation, over the games the player dressed. Zone starts describe faceoff-started five-on-five shifts and exclude on-the-fly starts.
Penalties count events, including one for a double minor; bench and served-by roles are excluded, and victimless infractions have no drawn role. EPV added sums changes in the probability that the possessing team scores next; it is not standings points or an isolated player grade. Rolling windows never cross seasons or season types, and a missed game is not a zero-performance appearance. Career rates use summed counts and exposure, never an average of season rates; a missing contributing season withholds its career metric, and Performance begins in 2023–24.
Explore the full methodology →Official playoff totals · no peer ranks, since playoff samples are too small for a fair comparison
No playoff games have been played this season yet.
All covered playoff runs (2015–16 onward). Traditional totals are all situations; analytical columns use matching five-on-five coverage.
Qualified · 2026–27 forwards
Provisional comparisons · Small sample.
What each component is built from
Each is measured against expectation, per 60 rated minutes: plus is above, minus below.
| Component | Weight | Scaled | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offense | 25% | −0.401 | −0.100 |
| Defense | 25% | 0.897 | +0.224 |
| Chance creation | 20% | −0.337 | −0.067 |
| Finishing | 10% | −0.227 | −0.023 |
| Assisting | 20% | −0.136 | −0.027 |
| Performance rate | 0.007 | ||
Per 60 rated minutes, over the scored appearances. Each component is scaled separately, then weighted; the contributions add to the performance rate at full precision, so rounded figures may differ.
Season grade is the qualified peer percentile on the same letter bands as Game Grade — A+ ≥88, A ≥78, A− ≥68, B+ ≥58, B ≥50, B− ≥42, C+ ≥35, C ≥28, C− ≥22, D ≥15, F below 15 — and needs qualification plus at least 30 eligible peers. The letter describes this season’s performance, not permanent ability.
Rank and component percentiles compare this season’s qualified forwards on unrounded rates over every checked appearance; Game Grade compares one appearance with frozen historical games.
Component percentiles are never averaged into the score. Recent history is optional, from up to three completed prior seasons; small samples are provisional.
Qualification: 3 covered appearances, 47.6 rated minutes, and 90% appearance and workload coverage. Minimums advance with league progress; valid low-sample results stay visible.
Rated minutes exclude play with a goalie pulled: 0.0 min excluded; official TOI 78.3 min.
Coverage: partial. Updated .
Five weighted components add to the performance rate. Five-on-five offense and defense account for recorded teammates, opponents and game state, so shared on-ice results are not isolated individual ability. Finishing is scored against the shot model’s historical-shooter expectation and assisting counts primary assists plus half of secondary assists; both use the strength baseline, chance creation its positional baseline.
Five-on-five on-ice suppression; individual events in all situations.
| Suppression & events | Player | Percentile | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 45.49 | — | — | |
| 3.57 | — | — | |
| 0.072 | — | — | |
| 6.06 | — | — | |
| 6.06 | — | — | |
| 2.02 | — | — | |
| 1.35 | — | — | |
| 0.00 | — | — |
Player value: 45.49
Peer range: 34.49 – 78.21 / 60
Player 45.49 · mean 56.20. Lower raw values are better. Needs 6 appearances and 90 five-on-five minutes (full season: 20 and 300).
On-ice attempts against per 60, including blocks.
Needs 6 appearances and 90 five-on-five minutes (full season: 20 and 300).
Recorded season event counts · all situations
Taken 2Drawn 2
Giveaways 2Takeaways 3
0:03 recorded ice time · peers need 100 minutes
| Power play rates | Player | Percentile | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.00 | — | — | |
| 0.00 | — | — | |
| 0.00 | — | — | |
| 0.00 | — | — | |
| 0.00 | — | — | |
| 0.00 | — | — |
Player value: 0.00
Peer distribution not published for this axis.
Player 0.00 · mean —. Higher raw values rank higher. Needs 100 minutes in this special-teams scope.
Recorded goals plus assists per 60 in this scope; widened power-play and penalty-kill scopes.
Needs 100 minutes in this special-teams scope.
21:32 recorded ice time · peers need 100 minutes
| Penalty kill rates | Player | Percentile | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4.51 | — | — | |
| 2.79 | — | — | |
| 78.02 | — | — | |
| 2.79 | — | — | |
| 0.74 | — | — |
Player value: 4.51
Peer distribution not published for this axis.
Player 4.51 · mean —. Lower raw values are better. Fewer than 30 qualified peers.
Raw on-ice expected goals against per 60; the Season metrics sample.
Fewer than 30 qualified peers.
Five-on-five · what happened beside the chances created and allowed
| On-ice results | Player | Percentile | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.89 | — | — | |
| 1.60 | — | — | |
| 0.00 | — | — | |
| 1.94 | — | — | |
| 100.0 | — | — | |
| 45.2 | — | — | |
| 4.2 | — | — | |
| 100.0 | — | — | |
| 104.17 | — | — |
Player value: 0.89
Peer range: 0.00 – 8.03 / 60
Player 0.89 · mean 2.73. Higher raw values rank higher. Needs 6 appearances and 90 five-on-five minutes (full season: 20 and 300).
On-ice goals for per 60 in this scope; excludes shootouts. Covered games only; withheld below 90% of exposure games.
Needs 6 appearances and 90 five-on-five minutes (full season: 20 and 300).
Dallas's share with Radek Faksa on the ice against the same team without him.
| Share | On ice and off ice | On-minus-off gap in percentage points |
|---|---|---|
| xGF% | On ice 45.2%; off ice 46.5%. | -1.3 |
| CF% | On ice 51.9%; off ice 49.6%. | +2.3 |
| GF% | On ice 100.0%; off ice 65.0%. | +35.0 |
Scale 40–100% · marker at 50% · right column is the on-minus-off gap in points
Official totals; expected-goal columns are five-on-five.
| Opponent | Result | G | A | PPP | +/− | SOG | 5v5 on-ice xG share | Game | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 17 | @ CHI | W 4–0 | 10:48 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.11 | 49.5% | View → |
| Oct 14 | @ COL | W 3–2 SO | 12:41 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.01 | 54.8% | View → |
| Oct 13 | vs COL | L 2–3 | 9:55 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.05 | 81.6% | View → |
| Oct 10 | @ PIT | L 1–2 SO | 8:27 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.0% | View → |
| Oct 8 | @ BUF | W 4–0 | 13:11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.29 | 42.8% | View → |
| Oct 5 | vs SJS | W 5–0 | 12:30 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.07 | 41.7% | View → |
| Oct 3 | @ NSH | L 1–2 | 10:28 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.05 | 59.3% | View → |
| Oct 2 | vs STL | L 0–4 | 11:07 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.05 | 31.7% | View → |
| Filtered 8 | — | 4 W · 4 L | 11:08 avg | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 0.62 | 45.2% | — |
Ice time, share of team ice time, scoring and scoring rate, with where shifts start.
| Scope | TOI/GP | Team share | G | A | P | P/60 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Five-on-five | 8:25 | 17.8% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.89 |
| Power play | 0:00 | 0.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 |
| Penalty kill | 2:42 | 43.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 |
| Other | 0:02 | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 |
| All situations | 11:08 | 18.2% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.67 |
100.0% of points are secondary assists. Peer average 21.6%. Primary points per 60 (0.00).
Offensive 13.6%Neutral 36.4%Defensive 50.0%
15.9 a game · 0:42 average
Zone starts: five-on-five · Shifts: all situations
Elite defense is the lone bright spot, as he struggles with offense, chance creation, and finishing.
2026–27 · five-on-five · against qualified peers
| Production | Player | Percentile | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.89 | — | — | |
| 0.00 | — | — | |
| 0.00 | — | — |
| Shooting & finishing | Player | Percentile | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.55 | — | — | |
| 6.24 | — | — | |
| 14.27 | — | — | |
| 0.051 | — | — | |
| -0.55 | — | — |
Above averageNear averageBelow averageBars and shaded cells show peer percentile, so more is always better · tick at the 50th
Player value: 0.89
Peer range: 0.00 – 6.90 / 60
Player 0.89 · mean 1.79. Higher raw values rank higher. Needs 6 appearances and 90 five-on-five minutes (full season: 20 and 300); shot quality and finishing also need 9 unblocked attempts.
Recorded five-on-five goals plus assists per 60 minutes.
Needs 6 appearances and 90 five-on-five minutes (full season: 20 and 300); shot quality and finishing also need 9 unblocked attempts.
Player values are recorded season results. Peer averages are arithmetic means of qualified players in the selected group; each row uses the same peers for its average and rank. Ranks use unrounded values, with tied players sharing a rank and the next rank skipped. Lower xG against ranks better. Green/red differences show favorable/unfavorable values versus average, not isolated player impact. Brass marks top-ten ranks.
Goals above expected is the raw goals-minus-xG rate, without the shrinkage used in the older finishing comparison. On-ice measures include teammates, opponents and deployment. These recorded metrics describe different quantities from the adjusted Season score components beside them.
Skaters need 20 appearances and 300 five-on-five minutes; quality and finishing also need 75 unblocked attempts. Early in a season these minimums scale down with games played so far. At least 30 peers must qualify. Playoff ranks are withheld. A reviewed axis whose own evidence fails is withheld and shown with its reason rather than ranked. These workload rules do not express statistical confidence.
Position uses the NHL listed primary position available now; it does not establish historical position or actual deployment. Broad groups are forwards, defence and goalies. This version uses the current model’s covered games only.
Trailing ten appearances. Shaded games have fewer than ten in the window.
Per game · all situations
Reference: 2025–26 · 58 games.
Totals cover all situations; rates are five-on-five.
| Season | Box score · all situations | 5v5 individual | 5v5 on ice | Season performance | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Season | Age | Team | GP | G | A | P | +/− | PIM | SOG | Sh% | PPG | TOI/GP | Hits | Blk | P/60 | ixG/60 | SOG/60 | xG/UA | xGF/60 | xGA/60 | xGF% | CF% | GF% | Perf/60 | Grade | Rank |
| 2026–27 | 33 | DAL | 8 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 7 | 0.0 | 0 | 11:08 | 9 | 9 | 0.89 | 0.55 | 6.24 | 0.051 | 1.60 | 1.94 | 45.2 | 51.9 | 100.0 | 0.007 | B | 166 / 374 |
| 2025–26 | 32 | DAL | 58 | 2 | 15 | 17 | 2 | 18 | 38 | 5.3 | 0 | 11:44 | 78 | 44 | 1.43 | 0.43 | 3.53 | 0.071 | 1.50 | 1.94 | 43.5 | 45.1 | — | — | — | — |
| 2024–25 | 31 | STL | 70 | 5 | 10 | 15 | -2 | 30 | 68 | 7.4 | 0 | 13:01 | 115 | — | 0.85 | 0.43 | 4.62 | 0.059 | 1.83 | 1.99 | 47.9 | 47.6 | — | — | — | — |
| 2023–24 | 30 | DAL | 74 | 7 | 12 | 19 | 0 | 20 | 71 | 9.9 | 0 | 12:31 | 97 | — | 1.20 | 0.60 | 5.03 | 0.069 | 2.16 | 1.99 | 52.1 | 55.0 | — | — | — | — |
| 2022–23 | 29 | DAL | 81 | 11 | 9 | 20 | 9 | 39 | 88 | 12.5 | 0 | 13:43 | 89 | — | 1.17 | 0.55 | 4.96 | 0.081 | 2.25 | 2.10 | 51.7 | 51.9 | — | — | — | — |
| 2021–22 | 28 | DAL | 77 | 5 | 14 | 19 | -20 | 52 | 89 | 5.6 | 1 | 15:46 | 129 | — | 0.83 | 0.46 | 4.86 | 0.065 | 1.84 | 2.33 | 44.1 | 44.3 | — | — | — | — |
| 2020–21 | 27 | DAL | 55 | 6 | 8 | 14 | -15 | 30 | 94 | 6.4 | 1 | 17:26 | 100 | — | 0.90 | 0.52 | 6.65 | 0.063 | 1.78 | 2.35 | 43.1 | 47.8 | — | — | — | — |
| 2019–20 | 26 | DAL | 66 | 11 | 9 | 20 | -6 | 42 | 109 | 10.1 | 3 | 15:53 | 84 | — | 1.09 | 0.75 | 6.64 | 0.080 | 2.27 | 2.27 | 49.9 | 48.0 | — | — | — | — |
| 2018–19 | 25 | DAL | 81 | 15 | 15 | 30 | -3 | 54 | 114 | 13.2 | 1 | 16:26 | 103 | — | 1.22 | 0.65 | 4.97 | 0.090 | 2.21 | 2.50 | 46.9 | 45.3 | — | — | — | — |
| 2017–18 | 24 | DAL | 79 | 17 | 16 | 33 | 21 | 36 | 118 | 14.4 | 0 | 15:16 | 101 | — | 1.63 | 0.53 | 6.05 | 0.072 | 2.20 | 2.05 | 51.7 | 50.1 | — | — | — | — |
| 2016–17 | 23 | DAL | 80 | 12 | 21 | 33 | -6 | 67 | 132 | 9.1 | 0 | 16:10 | 101 | — | 1.54 | 0.68 | 6.79 | 0.066 | 2.63 | 2.45 | 51.9 | 51.9 | — | — | — | — |
| 2015–16 | 22 | DAL | 45 | 5 | 7 | 12 | 9 | 16 | 67 | 7.5 | 0 | 12:21 | 48 | — | 1.13 | 0.92 | 8.03 | 0.079 | 2.57 | 2.46 | 51.0 | 53.6 | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 12 seasons | 774 | 96 | 137 | 233 | -10 | 411 | 995 | 9.6 | 6 | 14:38 | 1054 | — | 1.19 | 0.59 | 5.62 | 0.072 | 2.13 | 2.23 | 48.8 | 49.1 | — | — | — | — |
Loading historical performance grades…
Shading: peer percentile that season. Bold: career high.
