Bands show position percentiles; axis labels show current rolling values.
Dashed outline: peer average in the fixed reference. Outside = above average; inside = below average. All axes point outward for stronger results.
Player value: 2.39 Peer range: 1.68 – 4.20 xGF/60
MeanAndrew Copp
Lower Higher (better)
Player 2.39 · mean 2.54. Higher raw values rank higher.
Rolling profile against a fixed reference group
Fixed rolling-profile reference · 430 players. Values use the same history and smoothing as the radar.
History, sample sizes & calculation
Higher radar percentiles mean stronger recorded results against the fixed reference, including older seasons. These are separate from this season’s league percentile. Each player has a different amount of covered history. Weighted minutes and attempts give recent games more influence. “Prior” is the share contributed by a frozen league baseline: it is higher when a player has less evidence, and differs by metric because each uses its own smoothing strength. It is not a confidence score.
On-ice offense · xGF/60
1058.7 weighted minutes · 16% prior
On-ice defense · xGA/60
1058.7 weighted minutes · 27% prior
Chance generation · ixG/60
1058.7 weighted minutes · 16% prior
Shot quality · ixG/attempt
142.0 weighted attempts · 15% prior
Finishing · goals above expected/60
142.0 weighted attempts · 22% prior
History through Oct 17, 2026. Recent games count more than older games. History carries across seasons and stays unchanged while inactive. On-ice results are shared; finishing describes results rather than established talent.
Recent scoring against his own season
Recent scoring against his own season
Loading recent games…
Loading splits…
Loading linemates…
Loading playoff games…
Loading game log…
Loading career ledger…
Every metric name opens its definition; the full list lives in Metrics.
Traditional statistics cover all situations. Supporting five-on-five analyses use completed games, raw adjustment and exposure from xG model v4. The two samples can differ.
An em dash means unavailable, not zero. A partial season remains partial. Where a panel reports evidence coverage, its rates use only the covered games. History never substitutes a different model, and a missing appearance interrupts a rolling model window.
Shot maps use the same shot model as Game Center and show which model version scored recent shots beside the rink. Older seasons can use earlier model versions. High danger means a model scoring probability of at least 0.20 on an unblocked attempt; for goalies, medium danger is 0.08 to 0.20 and low is below 0.08.
Special-team buckets include the wider recorded man-advantage and man-down states, read from the player’s own team; for a goalie, penalty kill means facing a power play. Their ranks need 100 recorded minutes and at least 30 qualified peers; below 100 minutes, penalty-kill percentiles are provisional. Playoff values have no ranks or percentiles. Team share is player ice time divided by team ice time in that situation, over the games the player dressed. Zone starts describe faceoff-started five-on-five shifts and exclude on-the-fly starts.
Penalties count events, including one for a double minor; bench and served-by roles are excluded, and victimless infractions have no drawn role. EPV added sums changes in the probability that the possessing team scores next; it is not standings points or an isolated player grade. Rolling windows never cross seasons or season types, and a missed game is not a zero-performance appearance. Career rates use summed counts and exposure, never an average of season rates; a missing contributing season withholds its career metric, and Performance begins in 2023–24.
Average 0.56 individual expected goals per 60 (150th of 220)
Average 0.56 individual expected goals per 60 (150th of 220)
50.0%93rd of 220
Average 50.0% on-ice expected goal share at five-on-five (93rd of 220)
Average 50.0% on-ice expected goal share at five-on-five (93rd of 220)
Average 2.45 on-ice expected goals against per 60 (102nd of 220)
Average 2.45 on-ice expected goals against per 60 (102nd of 220)
Defensive metrics
Five-on-five on-ice suppression; individual events in all situations.
Suppression
Player
Percentile
Rank
58.05
133 / 22040th
1.23
40 / 20481st
0.062
136 / 22038th
Puck management
Player
Percentile
Rank
1.01
98 / 22056th
3.44
170 / 22023rd
0.05
122 / 22045th
Physical style
Player
Percentile
Rank
2.93
40 / 22082nd
2.02
167 / 22024th
Context · not graded
Player value: 58.05 Peer range: 44.90 – 72.11 / 60
MeanAndrew Copp
Lower (better)Higher
Player 58.05 · mean 56.94. Lower raw values are better.
On-ice attempts against per 60, including blocks.
Evidence coverage: high danger 75 of 79 games.
Discipline & puck management
Recorded season event counts · all situations
Penaltiesnet +1
Taken 12Drawn 13
Puck eventsnet -53
Giveaways 75Takeaways 22
Blocks
64
all situations
Hits
44
all situations
Average 4.50 power-play points per 60 (46th of 92)
Average 4.50 power-play points per 60 (46th of 92)
Power play
106:37 recorded ice time · peers need 100 minutes
Share of team PP
27.2%
in games dressed
PP points
8
goals + assists
Unit xGF / 60
6.84
team without: 10.53
Power play rates
Player
Percentile
Rank
4.50
46 / 9251st
2.81
50 / 8743rd
6.75
84 / 929th
1.50
73 / 9221st
6.84
84 / 929th
7.32
61 / 9234th
Player value: 4.50 Peer range: 0.96 – 10.95 / 60
MeanAndrew Copp
Lower Higher (better)
Player 4.50 · mean 4.79. Higher raw values rank higher.
Recorded goals plus assists per 60 in this scope; widened power-play and penalty-kill scopes.
Penalty kill
114:34 recorded ice time · peers need 100 minutes
Share of team PK
35.3%
in games dressed
SH points
0
goals + assists
Unit xGA / 60
10.32
team without: 8.74
Penalty kill rates
Player
Percentile
Rank
10.32
64 / 7313th
7.93
35 / 7353rd
124.12
68 / 737th
9.08
54 / 7326th
0.78
50 / 7332nd
Player value: 10.32 Peer range: 5.65 – 11.51 / 60
MeanAndrew Copp
Lower (better)Higher
Player 10.32 · mean 8.60. Lower raw values are better.
Raw on-ice expected goals against per 60; the Season metrics sample.
Evidence coverage: goals 73 of 74 games · high danger 72 of 74 games.
16:34 TOI per game (12:57 at five-on-five · 1:21 PP · 1:27 PK)
16:34 TOI per game (12:57 at five-on-five · 1:21 PP · 1:27 PK)
Results vs expected
Five-on-five · what happened beside the chances created and allowed
Chances
Player
Percentile
Rank
2.45
96 / 22057th
2.45
102 / 22054th
50.0
93 / 22058th
Goals
Player
Percentile
Rank
2.57
70 / 17460th
2.32
49 / 17472nd
52.6
48 / 17473rd
Luck & variance
Player
Percentile
Rank
9.1
T-91 / 17448th
90.7
T-70 / 17460th
99.79
78 / 17455th
Context · not graded
Player value: 2.45 Peer range: 1.49 – 3.89 / 60
MeanAndrew Copp
Lower Higher (better)
Player 2.45 · mean 2.41. Higher raw values rank higher.
Raw on-ice expected goals for per 60; the Season metrics sample.
5v5 goals
40–36
72 of 79 games
5v5 expected
41.7–41.8
xG for–against
EPV added
+4.11
79 attributed games · all situations
On ice vs off ice
Detroit's share with Andrew Copp on the ice against the same team without him.
Share
On ice and off ice
On-minus-off gap in percentage points
xGF%
On ice 50.0%; off ice 47.6%.
47.650.0
+2.3
CF%
On ice 50.0%; off ice 48.6%.
48.650.0
+1.4
GF%
On ice 52.6%; off ice 42.9%.
42.952.6
+9.8
On iceOff ice
Scale 40–65% · marker at 50% · right column is the on-minus-off gap in points
Cooling 4 points in the last 10 games (0.40 per game vs 0.54 this season)
Cooling 4 points in the last 10 games (0.40 per game vs 0.54 this season)
0.47 points per game at home · 0.62 away
0.47 points per game at home · 0.62 away
79 games · most recent at FLA, L 1–8: 0 G, 0 A
79 games · most recent at FLA, L 1–8: 0 G, 0 A
Andrew Copp
185 attempts15.99 xG9 G
Goal9Shot on goal106Missed shot70Blocked shot0Larger dot = higher xG
Shooting by zone
Zone
Att
G
xG
Goal rate / exp.
G−xG
Below goal line
6
1
0.2
16.7% / 3.7%
+0.8
Point
24
1
0.9
4.2% / 3.7%
+0.1
Right circle
8
0
0.1
0.0% / 1.7%
−0.1
Left circle
9
0
0.7
0.0% / 7.3%
−0.7
Outer slot
14
0
1.0
0.0% / 7.2%
−1.0
High slot
44
2
4.0
4.5% / 9.0%
−2.0
Inner slot
80
5
9.1
6.3% / 11.4%
−4.1
All zones
185
9
16.0
4.9% / 8.6%
−7.0
Sorted by goals minus expected goals. Goal rate is goals per unblocked attempt against the expected rate. Hover a row to light up those attempts on the rink.
Finishing evidence. Scoring 4.9% on chances vs 8.6% expected (−3.8 points), with the largest shortfall in the inner slot.
Shot types185 attempts
Type
Share
Sh%
G−xG
Wrist
42.7%
6.1%
−3.5
Snap
22.2%
7.7%
−2.1
Tip-in
18.9%
17.6%
−0.3
Backhand
8.1%
0.0%
−1.0
Deflected
3.8%
0.0%
−0.8
Slap
2.7%
0.0%
−0.1
Other
1.6%
—
+0.8
Share is context, not a grade. Sh% counts shots on goal only.
High-danger chancesmodel probability ≥ 0.20
Attempts8.1% of the selected attempts
15
Goals
4
Expected goals
5.2
Conversion
26.7%34.8% expected
Shot profilecontext · not graded
On-net rate115 of 185 attempts on goal
62.2%
Slot share124 of 185 from the inner or high slot
67.0%
Average distancefrom the centre of the net
22.0 ft
Rebound attempts / 6030 this season · all situations
1.37
Usage by situation
Ice time, share of team ice time, scoring and scoring rate, with where shifts start.
Scope
TOI/GP
Team share
G
A
P
P/60
Five-on-five
12:57
26.5%
4
22
26
1.52
Power play
1:21
27.2%
1
7
8
4.50
Penalty kill
1:27
35.3%
0
0
0
0.00
Other
0:49
—
4
5
9
8.34
All situations
16:34
27.3%
9
34
43
1.97
Where the 43 points come from · All situations
Goals9 · 0.41/60
Primary assists18 · 0.82/60
Secondary assists16 · 0.73/60
37.2% of points are secondary assists. Peer average 25.1%. Primary points per 60 (1.24).
Zone starts 48.9% offensive of OZ + DZ · 46th percentile
Offensive 27.3%Neutral 44.1%Defensive 28.5%
Shifts
22.1 a game · 0:45 average
Zone starts: five-on-five · Shifts: all situations
Faceoffs
All situations · zones are read from his side of the draw · values only; no peer ranks yet
Win %
54.2%
537 of 990 draws
Draws per game
12.53
79 games
Offensive zone
54.3%
352 draws
Defensive zone
53.4%
324 draws
Power play
57.1%
77 draws
Every game · rest counts days off before the game; the playoff field is the standings' top three per division plus two wild cards
Split
GP
G
A
P
P/GP
5v5 xG share
Team record
Venue
Home
40
3
16
19
0.47
49.2%
20–16–4
Away
39
6
18
24
0.62
50.6%
20–14–5
Rest
Back-to-back
13
1
3
4
0.31
51.9%
3–7–3
1 day of rest
47
6
26
32
0.68
48.7%
25–16–6
2+ days of rest
18
2
5
7
0.39
50.5%
12–6–0
Opponent
vs Eastern
49
7
20
27
0.55
51.8%
22–20–7
vs Western
30
2
14
16
0.53
46.8%
18–10–2
vs playoff teams
41
6
11
17
0.41
48.5%
16–19–6
vs non-playoff teams
38
3
23
26
0.68
51.8%
24–11–3
Recent
Last 10
10
0
4
4
0.40
49.3%
2–6–2
By period and score state
Split
G
A
P
5v5 xG share
5v5 CF%
5v5 GF–GA
Period
1st period
1
7
8
—
—
—
2nd period
3
15
18
—
—
—
3rd period
4
10
14
—
—
—
Overtime
1
2
3
—
—
—
Score state · 5v5 on ice
Leading
—
—
—
46.1%
40.3%
16–9
Tied
—
—
—
52.0%
52.6%
14–11
Trailing
—
—
—
51.5%
55.6%
12–20
From play-by-play; shootouts excluded. Score state is his team's, before each event.
Official totals; expected-goal columns are five-on-five.
Elite90+Strong70–89Average30–69Weak10–29Poor<10Bar length is the peer percentile, so longer is always better · tick at the 50th
Player value: 1.52 Peer range: 0.47 – 3.42 / 60
MeanAndrew Copp
Lower Higher (better)
Player 1.52 · mean 1.55. Higher raw values rank higher.
Recorded five-on-five goals plus assists per 60 minutes.
How to read these comparisons
Player values are recorded season results. Peer averages are arithmetic means of qualified players in the selected group; each row uses the same peers for its average and rank. Ranks use unrounded values, with tied players sharing a rank and the next rank skipped. Lower xG against ranks better. Bar colours are the five performance tiers; context rows are blue and not graded. Differences from the average describe the season, not isolated player impact.
Goals above expected is the raw goals-minus-xG rate, without the shrinkage used in the older finishing comparison. On-ice measures include teammates, opponents and deployment. These recorded metrics describe different quantities from the adjusted Season score components beside them.
Skaters need 20 appearances and 300 five-on-five minutes; quality and finishing also need 75 unblocked attempts. Early in a season these minimums scale down with games played so far. At least 30 peers must qualify. Playoff ranks are withheld. A reviewed axis whose own evidence fails is withheld and shown with its reason rather than ranked. These workload rules do not express statistical confidence.
Position uses the NHL listed primary position available now; it does not establish historical position or actual deployment. Broad groups are forwards, defence and goalies. This version uses the current model’s covered games only.
Season vs reference
Per game · all situations
Metric2025–26ReferenceDiff
0.110.18-0.06
0.430.23+0.20
0.540.41+0.13
1.461.21+0.24
Reference: 2024–25 · 56 games.
Each game against his own season
Points in each game, coloured by how good the game wasTrailing 10 games, per gameSeason 0.54
Points
4
0 G · 4 A
Team record
2–6–2
in his games
5v5 xG share
49.3%
on ice
5v5 ixG
1.3
individual expected goals
Avg TOI
18:05
all situations
Tiles cover the last 10 games.
Season grade
C+
#257 of 400 qualified F36th percentile
Performance / 60−0.0779/79 GP
Strong playmaking, but he's struggling to finish and isn't generating enough of his own looks — 0.33 goals below expected per 60 (162nd of 175).
12 NHL seasons: 786 games, 344 points
12 NHL seasons: 786 games, 344 points
Totals cover all situations; rates are five-on-five.
Expected goals against while the player is on the ice (fewer is better)
Chance creation
Expected goals from the player’s own shots
Finishing
Goals minus expected goals on the player’s own shots
Assisting
Primary assists plus half of secondary assists
Each is measured against expectation, per 60 rated minutes: plus is above, minus below.
How this is calculated
Score breakdown
Component
Weight
Scaled
Contribution
Offense
25%
−0.146
−0.036
Defense
25%
−0.010
−0.003
Chance creation
20%
−0.238
−0.048
Finishing
10%
−0.196
−0.020
Assisting
20%
0.163
+0.033
Performance rate
−0.074
Per 60 rated minutes, over the scored appearances. Each component is scaled separately, then weighted; the contributions add to the performance rate at full precision, so rounded figures may differ.
Scoring
Season grade is the qualified peer percentile on the same letter bands as Game Grade — A+ ≥88, A ≥78, A− ≥68, B+ ≥58, B ≥50, B− ≥42, C+ ≥35, C ≥28, C− ≥22, D ≥15, F below 15 — and needs qualification plus at least 30 eligible peers. The letter describes this season’s performance, not permanent ability.
Comparisons
Rank and component percentiles compare this season’s qualified forwards on unrounded rates over every checked appearance; Game Grade compares one appearance with frozen historical games.
Component percentiles are never averaged into the score. Recent history is optional, from up to three completed prior seasons; small samples are provisional.
Coverage
Qualification: 29 covered appearances, 492.0 rated minutes, and 90% appearance and workload coverage. Minimums advance with league progress; valid low-sample results stay visible.
Rated minutes exclude play with a goalie pulled: 34.5 min excluded; official TOI 1309.3 min.
Coverage: complete. Updated .
Method
Five weighted components add to the performance rate. Five-on-five offense and defense account for recorded teammates, opponents and game state, so shared on-ice results are not isolated individual ability. Finishing is scored against the shot model’s historical-shooter expectation and assisting counts primary assists plus half of secondary assists; both use the strength baseline, chance creation its positional baseline.
Legacy rating
Legacy season score: 27.0 / 100. The fixed exposure baseline is 50; this is separate from the season peer grade.
Most often with Alex DeBrincat: 635 five-on-five minutes, 51.8% xG share together
Most often with Alex DeBrincat: 635 five-on-five minutes, 51.8% xG share together
Five-on-five · time together from shift charts (1,036:09 of his 5v5 ice time) · xG share together and apart
Teammate
Pos
TOI together
xG share together
GF–GA
CF%
Him without
Teammate without
Alex DeBrincat
R
634:57
51.8%
36–21
49.8%
46.3%
56.9%
Patrick Kane
R
541:28
53.3%
31–17
50.8%
45.5%
53.8%
Ben Chiarot
D
399:59
44.8%
19–13
47.9%
53.2%
42.1%
Moritz Seider
D
393:37
54.1%
22–9
53.3%
47.5%
56.3%
Simon Edvinsson
D
359:09
53.0%
18–12
52.6%
48.5%
51.3%
Albert Johansson
D
290:33
46.7%
5–13
46.3%
51.4%
47.5%
Axel Sandin-Pellikka
D
254:56
49.2%
12–16
48.6%
50.3%
44.2%
Jacob Bernard-Docker
D
213:14
60.2%
3–5
54.4%
47.4%
43.6%
J.T. Compher
L
164:03
44.2%
4–5
47.8%
50.8%
47.0%
James van Riemsdyk
L
99:42
55.7%
2–6
58.3%
49.4%
45.7%
Jonatan Berggren
R
86:06
43.6%
2–1
50.7%
50.5%
41.0%
Lucas Raymond
L
82:35
37.2%
3–7
43.0%
51.2%
50.8%
Without columns are five-on-five xG share apart: him on the ice without that teammate, and the teammate without him (with this club). Bars are centred on an even 50%.
