Elias Lindholm — 2025–26 stats and season rank | IceSheet
Elias Lindholm
Boston Bruins·#28·Center · Shoots right
Age 31 · 6′1″ · 200 lb · Boden, SWE
Loading season standing…
Games69T-359th in NHL
Goals170.25/GP▲0.04T-163rd in NHL
Assists310.45/GP▲0.08T-126th in NHL
Points480.70/GP▲0.12…
5v5 xG share…
Avg TOI17:53…
/
Loading season standing and profile…
Season comparisons
Loading peer comparisons and model evidence…
Optional recent-history profile
Rolling Radar
Loading recent-history profile…
Loading model evidence…
Loading defensive evidence…
Shot locations
Loading canonical shot events…
Usage by situation
Loading usage…
Loading special teams…
T-144th in NHL
249th in NHL
Rolling Radar
Recent NHL history, carried across seasons. The radar compares this broader profile with a fixed position-group reference.
Rolling profile is currently unavailable.
Recent scoring against his own season
Recent scoring against his own season
Loading recent games…
Loading splits…
Loading linemates…
Loading playoff games…
Loading game log…
Loading career ledger…
Every metric name opens its definition; the full list lives in Metrics.
Traditional statistics cover all situations. Supporting five-on-five analyses use completed games, raw adjustment and exposure from xG model v4. The two samples can differ.
An em dash means unavailable, not zero. A partial season remains partial. Where a panel reports evidence coverage, its rates use only the covered games. History never substitutes a different model, and a missing appearance interrupts a rolling model window.
Shot maps use the same shot model as Game Center and show which model version scored recent shots beside the rink. Older seasons can use earlier model versions. High danger means a model scoring probability of at least 0.20 on an unblocked attempt; for goalies, medium danger is 0.08 to 0.20 and low is below 0.08.
Special-team buckets include the wider recorded man-advantage and man-down states, read from the player’s own team; for a goalie, penalty kill means facing a power play. Their ranks need 100 recorded minutes and at least 30 qualified peers; below 100 minutes, penalty-kill percentiles are provisional. Playoff values have no ranks or percentiles. Team share is player ice time divided by team ice time in that situation, over the games the player dressed. Zone starts describe faceoff-started five-on-five shifts and exclude on-the-fly starts.
Penalties count events, including one for a double minor; bench and served-by roles are excluded, and victimless infractions have no drawn role. EPV added sums changes in the probability that the possessing team scores next; it is not standings points or an isolated player grade. Rolling windows never cross seasons or season types, and a missed game is not a zero-performance appearance. Career rates use summed counts and exposure, never an average of season rates; a missing contributing season withholds its career metric, and Performance begins in 2023–24.
Most often with Morgan Geekie: 637 five-on-five minutes, 49.1% xG share together
Most often with Morgan Geekie: 637 five-on-five minutes, 49.1% xG share together
Five-on-five · time together from shift charts (945:42 of his 5v5 ice time) · xG share together and apart
Teammate
Pos
TOI together
xG share together
GF–GA
CF%
Him without
Teammate without
Morgan Geekie
C
636:33
49.1%
30–30
47.7%
44.7%
49.3%
David Pastrnak
R
622:07
48.6%
26–30
46.5%
46.4%
54.0%
Charlie McAvoy
D
359:19
49.1%
14–15
47.0%
46.9%
50.3%
Nikita Zadorov
D
312:36
39.6%
12–18
42.9%
51.8%
48.1%
Andrew Peeke
D
257:19
42.3%
8–14
45.8%
49.8%
45.2%
Hampus Lindholm
D
241:44
52.5%
14–13
52.2%
46.3%
50.5%
Mason Lohrei
D
240:33
45.4%
9–9
46.0%
48.7%
49.1%
Marat Khusnutdinov
C
233:01
47.1%
10–8
45.9%
48.0%
49.8%
Jonathan Aspirot
D
219:57
53.4%
11–8
46.4%
45.7%
49.7%
Henri Jokiharju
D
145:34
49.7%
11–9
45.8%
47.5%
51.2%
Alex Steeves
C
125:18
53.7%
6–5
49.6%
47.0%
52.2%
Lukas Reichel
L
73:32
45.5%
6–2
52.1%
48.0%
50.6%
Without columns are five-on-five xG share apart: him on the ice without that teammate, and the teammate without him (with this club). Bars are centred on an even 50%.
Expected goals against while the player is on the ice (fewer is better)
Chance creation
Expected goals from the player’s own shots
Finishing
Goals minus expected goals on the player’s own shots
Assisting
Primary assists plus half of secondary assists
Each is measured against expectation, per 60 rated minutes: plus is above, minus below.
How this is calculated
Score breakdown
Component
Weight
Scaled
Contribution
Offense
25%
0.304
+0.076
Defense
25%
−0.330
−0.083
Chance creation
20%
0.156
+0.031
Finishing
10%
−0.006
−0.001
Assisting
20%
0.043
+0.009
Performance rate
0.033
Per 60 rated minutes, over the scored appearances. Each component is scaled separately, then weighted; the contributions add to the performance rate at full precision, so rounded figures may differ.
Scoring
Season grade is the qualified peer percentile on the same letter bands as Game Grade — A+ ≥88, A ≥78, A− ≥68, B+ ≥58, B ≥50, B− ≥42, C+ ≥35, C ≥28, C− ≥22, D ≥15, F below 15 — and needs qualification plus at least 30 eligible peers. The letter describes this season’s performance, not permanent ability.
Comparisons
Rank and component percentiles compare this season’s qualified forwards on unrounded rates over every checked appearance; Game Grade compares one appearance with frozen historical games.
Component percentiles are never averaged into the score. Recent history is optional, from up to three completed prior seasons; small samples are provisional.
Coverage
Qualification: 14 covered appearances, 226.5 rated minutes, and 90% appearance and workload coverage. Minimums advance with league progress; valid low-sample results stay visible.
Rated minutes exclude play with a goalie pulled: 14.9 min excluded; official TOI 498.8 min.
Coverage: partial. Updated .
Method
Five weighted components add to the performance rate. Five-on-five offense and defense account for recorded teammates, opponents and game state, so shared on-ice results are not isolated individual ability. Finishing is scored against the shot model’s historical-shooter expectation and assisting counts primary assists plus half of secondary assists; both use the strength baseline, chance creation its positional baseline.
Legacy rating
Legacy season score: 63.7 / 100. The fixed exposure baseline is 50; this is separate from the season peer grade.
2025–26 playoffs
Official playoff totals · no peer ranks, since playoff samples are too small for a fair comparison
Games
6
18:42 per game
Goals
2
0 on the power play
Assists
0
official
Points
2
0 power-play points
Plus-minus
-3
even strength and shorthanded
Shots
10
20.0% shooting
Playoff games
Official totals; expected-goal columns are five-on-five.
Average 0.59 individual expected goals per 60 (137th of 220)
Average 0.59 individual expected goals per 60 (137th of 220)
47.9%129th of 220
Average 47.9% on-ice expected goal share at five-on-five (129th of 220)
Average 47.9% on-ice expected goal share at five-on-five (129th of 220)
Poor 2.83 on-ice expected goals against per 60 (201st of 220)
Poor 2.83 on-ice expected goals against per 60 (201st of 220)
Defensive metrics
Five-on-five on-ice suppression; individual events in all situations.
Suppression
Player
Percentile
Rank
62.42
198 / 22010th
—
—
—
0.063
160 / 22027th
Puck management
Player
Percentile
Rank
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Physical style
Player
Percentile
Rank
—
—
—
—
—
—
Context · not graded
Player value: 62.42 Peer range: 44.90 – 72.11 / 60
MeanElias Lindholm
Lower (better)Higher
Player 62.42 · mean 56.94. Lower raw values are better.
On-ice attempts against per 60, including blocks.
Evidence coverage: high danger 39 of 69 games.
Discipline & puck management
Recorded season event counts · all situations
Penaltiesnet —
Taken —Drawn —
Puck eventsnet —
Giveaways —Takeaways —
Blocks
—
all situations
Hits
—
all situations
Both penalty counts cover 41 of 69 games with every drawn role recorded.
Strong 6.36 power-play points per 60 (15th of 92)
Strong 6.36 power-play points per 60 (15th of 92)
Power play
188:47 recorded ice time · peers need 100 minutes
Share of team PP
—
in games dressed
PP points
20
goals + assists
Unit xGF / 60
9.75
team without: —
Power play rates
Player
Percentile
Rank
6.36
15 / 9285th
—
—
—
10.17
54 / 9242nd
2.34
25 / 9274th
9.75
23 / 9276th
—
—
—
Player value: 6.36 Peer range: 0.96 – 10.95 / 60
MeanElias Lindholm
Lower Higher (better)
Player 6.36 · mean 4.79. Higher raw values rank higher.
Recorded goals plus assists per 60 in this scope; widened power-play and penalty-kill scopes.
Evidence coverage: goals 38 of 66 games · team time 41 of 69 games.
Penalty kill
65:58 recorded ice time · peers need 100 minutes
Share of team PK
—
in games dressed
SH points
0
goals + assists
Unit xGA / 60
9.86
team without: —
Penalty kill rates
Player
Percentile
Rank
9.86
—
—
—
—
90.96
—
—
—
—
0.64
—
No rank yet
Player value: 9.86 Peer range: 5.64 – 11.51 / 60
MeanElias Lindholm
Lower (better)Higher
Player 9.86 · mean 8.60. Lower raw values are better. Provisional PK percentile: under 100 recorded minutes. Smaller samples are less reliable; official ranks need 100 minutes.
Raw on-ice expected goals against per 60; the Season metrics sample.
Provisional PK percentile: under 100 recorded minutes. Smaller samples are less reliable; official ranks need 100 minutes.
Evidence coverage: goals 32 of 56 games · high danger 33 of 56 games · team time 41 of 69 games.
17:53 TOI per game (13:05 at five-on-five · 2:44 PP · 0:57 PK)
17:53 TOI per game (13:05 at five-on-five · 2:44 PP · 0:57 PK)
Strong offense and chance creation, while giving up too much in his own end — 2.83 on-ice expected goals against per 60 (201st of 220).
Results vs expected
Five-on-five · what happened beside the chances created and allowed
Chances
Player
Percentile
Rank
2.60
71 / 22068th
2.83
201 / 2209th
47.9
129 / 22042nd
Goals
Player
Percentile
Rank
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Luck & variance
Player
Percentile
Rank
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Context · not graded
Player value: 2.60 Peer range: 1.49 – 3.89 / 60
MeanElias Lindholm
Lower Higher (better)
Player 2.60 · mean 2.41. Higher raw values rank higher.
Raw on-ice expected goals for per 60; the Season metrics sample.
5v5 goals
—
39 of 69 games
5v5 expected
39.1–42.5
xG for–against
EPV added
+3.66
69 attributed games · all situations
On ice vs off ice
Boston's share with Elias Lindholm on the ice against the same team without him.
Share
On ice and off ice
On-minus-off gap in percentage points
xGF%
On ice 47.9% · Off ice unavailable
—
CF%
On ice 46.8% · Off ice unavailable
—
GF%
On ice unavailable · Off ice unavailable
—
On iceOff ice
Scale 40–65% · marker at 50% · right column is the on-minus-off gap in points
Cooling 5 points in the last 10 games (0.50 per game vs 0.70 this season)
Cooling 5 points in the last 10 games (0.50 per game vs 0.70 this season)
0.81 points per game at home · 0.58 away
0.81 points per game at home · 0.58 away
69 games · most recent vs NJD, W 4–0: 0 G, 0 A
69 games · most recent vs NJD, W 4–0: 0 G, 0 A
Shot map
All 194 attempts
Elias Lindholm
194 attempts18.68 xG17 G
Goal17Shot on goal97Missed shot80Blocked shot0Larger dot = higher xG
Shooting by zone
Hover a row to light it up · click to pin
Zone
Att
G
xG
Goal rate
Exp.
Goals vs expected
G−xG
High slot
69
10
7.1
14.5%
10.3%
+2.9
Point
35
2
1.8
5.7%
5.2%
+0.2
Left circle
5
0
0.1
0.0%
2.3%
−0.1
Below goal line
2
0
0.4
0.0%
17.6%
−0.4
Right circle
15
0
0.5
0.0%
3.5%
−0.5
Outer slot
6
0
0.7
0.0%
11.8%
−0.7
Inner slot
62
5
8.1
8.1%
13.1%
−3.1
All zones
194
17
18.7
8.8%
9.6%
−1.7
Finishing evidence. Scoring 8.8% on chances vs 9.6% expected (−0.9 points), with the largest shortfall in the inner slot.
Sorted by goals minus expected goals. Goal rate is goals per unblocked attempt against the expected rate.
Shot profile
Context · not graded
On-net rate
58.8%
114 of 194 attempts on goal
Slot share
67.5%
131 from the inner or high slot
Average distance
27.5 ft
from the centre of the net
Rebound attempts / 60
1.17
24 this season · all situations
Shot types
194 attempts
Type
Share
Sh%
G−xG
Wrist
36.6%
16.3%
+1.1
Snap
28.9%
17.1%
0.0
Tip-in
25.8%
9.5%
−2.5
Slap
4.1%
0.0%
−0.7
Backhand
2.1%
33.3%
+0.8
Bat
1.5%
0.0%
−0.2
Other
1.0%
—
−0.2
Share is context, not a grade. Sh% counts shots on goal only.
High-danger chances
Model goal probability ≥ 0.20
Conversion33.3%−3.1 pts vs expected
Actual33.3%
Expected36.4%
Attempts
15
7.7% of these attempts
Goals
5
29% of all goals
Expected goals
5.5
0.36 xG per attempt
G−xG
−0.5
below model
Usage by situation
Ice time, share of team ice time, scoring and scoring rate, with where shifts start.
Scope
TOI/GP
Team share
G
A
P
P/60
Five-on-five
13:05
—
8
13
21
1.40
Power play
2:44
—
7
13
20
6.36
Penalty kill
0:57
—
0
0
0
0.00
Other
1:07
—
2
5
7
5.49
All situations
17:53
—
17
31
48
2.33
Where the 48 points come from · All situations
Goals17 · 0.83/60
Primary assists— · —/60
Secondary assists— · —/60
Zone starts — offensive of OZ + DZ
Offensive —Neutral —Defensive —
Shifts
— a game · — average
Zone starts: five-on-five · Shifts: all situations
Faceoffs
All situations · zones are read from his side of the draw · values only; no peer ranks yet
Win %
56.1%
660 of 1,177 draws
Draws per game
17.06
69 games
Offensive zone
60.4%
482 draws
Defensive zone
54.1%
407 draws
Power play
62.9%
186 draws
Every game · rest counts days off before the game; the playoff field is the standings' top three per division plus two wild cards
Split
GP
G
A
P
P/GP
5v5 xG share
Team record
Venue
Home
36
10
19
29
0.81
49.0%
25–10–1
Away
33
7
12
19
0.58
46.8%
12–14–7
Rest
Back-to-back
13
2
3
5
0.38
51.0%
8–2–3
1 day of rest
40
10
22
32
0.80
49.5%
22–13–5
2+ days of rest
15
4
5
9
0.60
42.6%
6–9–0
Opponent
vs Eastern
39
8
13
21
0.54
46.7%
20–13–6
vs Western
30
9
18
27
0.90
49.6%
17–11–2
vs playoff teams
32
5
10
15
0.47
42.1%
13–15–4
vs non-playoff teams
37
12
21
33
0.89
53.1%
24–9–4
Recent
Last 10
10
3
2
5
0.50
42.8%
5–3–2
By period and score state
Split
G
A
P
5v5 xG share
5v5 CF%
5v5 GF–GA
Period
1st period
4
8
12
—
—
—
2nd period
3
10
13
—
—
—
3rd period
10
13
23
—
—
—
Overtime
0
0
0
—
—
—
Score state · 5v5 on ice
Leading
—
—
—
45.4%
41.2%
14–13
Tied
—
—
—
52.0%
48.6%
13–20
Trailing
—
—
—
45.5%
51.2%
13–12
From play-by-play; shootouts excluded. Score state is his team's, before each event.
Official totals; expected-goal columns are five-on-five.
Elite90+Strong70–89Average30–69Weak10–29Poor<10Bar length is the peer percentile, so longer is always better · tick at the 50th
Player value: 1.40 Peer range: 0.47 – 3.42 / 60
MeanElias Lindholm
Lower Higher (better)
Player 1.40 · mean 1.55. Higher raw values rank higher.
Recorded five-on-five goals plus assists per 60 minutes.
How to read these comparisons
Player values are recorded season results. Peer averages are arithmetic means of qualified players in the selected group; each row uses the same peers for its average and rank. Ranks use unrounded values, with tied players sharing a rank and the next rank skipped. Lower xG against ranks better. Bar colours are the five performance tiers; context rows are blue and not graded. Differences from the average describe the season, not isolated player impact.
Goals above expected is the raw goals-minus-xG rate, without the shrinkage used in the older finishing comparison. On-ice measures include teammates, opponents and deployment. These recorded metrics describe different quantities from the adjusted Season score components beside them.
Skaters need 20 appearances and 300 five-on-five minutes; quality and finishing also need 75 unblocked attempts. Early in a season these minimums scale down with games played so far. At least 30 peers must qualify. Playoff ranks are withheld. A reviewed axis whose own evidence fails is withheld and shown with its reason rather than ranked. These workload rules do not express statistical confidence.
Position uses the NHL listed primary position available now; it does not establish historical position or actual deployment. Broad groups are forwards, defence and goalies. This version uses the current model’s covered games only.
Season vs reference
Per game · all situations
Metric2025–26ReferenceDiff
0.250.21+0.04
0.450.37+0.08
0.700.57+0.12
1.651.85-0.20
Reference: 2024–25 · 82 games.
Each game against his own season
Points in each game, coloured by how good the game wasTrailing 10 games, per gameSeason 0.70
Points
5
3 G · 2 A
Team record
5–3–2
in his games
5v5 xG share
42.8%
on ice
5v5 ixG
1.7
individual expected goals
Avg TOI
17:41
all situations
Tiles cover the last 10 games.
12 NHL seasons: 840 games, 599 points
12 NHL seasons: 840 games, 599 points
Totals cover all situations; rates are five-on-five.
