David Pastrnak

Boston Bruins#88Right wing Shoots right

Age 30 · 6′0″ · 199 lb · Havirov, CZE

No checked season results are available for this selection.

Games82T-1st in NHL

Goals350.43/GP▼0.03T-15th in NHL

Assists450.55/GP▲0.07T-41st in NHL

Points800.98/GP▲0.0421st in NHL…

5v5 xG share55.6%7th of 105…

Avg TOI17:58T-222nd in NHL…

Career awards

No checked season results are available for this selection.

No complete checked component breakdown is available for this selection.

Loading season standing and profile…

Season metrics

2017–18 · five-on-five · vs 105 positional peers

Player	Percentile	Rank
2.50		4 / 10597th
0.99		15 / 10587th
—	—	—

Shooting & finishing	Player	Percentile	Rank
	0.81		30 / 10572nd
	7.87		35 / 10567th
	14.76		27 / 10575th
	0.075		35 / 8660th
	0.18		12 / 8687th

Elite90+Strong70–89Average30–69Weak10–29Poor<10Bar length is the peer percentile, so longer is always better · tick at the 50th

How to read these comparisons

Player values are recorded season results. Peer averages are arithmetic means of qualified players in the selected group; each row uses the same peers for its average and rank. Ranks use unrounded values, with tied players sharing a rank and the next rank skipped. Lower xG against ranks better. Bar colours are the five performance tiers; context rows are blue and not graded. Differences from the average describe the season, not isolated player impact.

Goals above expected is the raw goals-minus-xG rate, without the shrinkage used in the older finishing comparison. On-ice measures include teammates, opponents and deployment. These recorded metrics describe different quantities from the adjusted Season score components beside them.

Skaters need 20 appearances and 300 five-on-five minutes; quality and finishing also need 75 unblocked attempts. Early in a season these minimums scale down with games played so far. At least 30 peers must qualify. Playoff ranks are withheld. A reviewed axis whose own evidence fails is withheld and shown with its reason rather than ranked. These workload rules do not express statistical confidence.

Position uses the NHL listed primary position available now; it does not establish historical position or actual deployment. Broad groups are forwards, defence and goalies. This version uses the current model’s covered games only.

Season vs reference

Reference

Per game · all situations

Metric2017–18ReferenceDiff

0.430.45-0.03

0.550.48+0.07

0.980.93+0.04

3.003.49-0.49

Reference: 2016–17 · 75 games.

Season comparisons

Loading peer comparisons and model evidence…

Optional recent-history profile

Rolling Radar

Recent NHL history, carried across seasons. The radar compares this broader profile with a fixed position-group reference.

Rolling profile is currently unavailable.

Rolling Radar

Loading recent-history profile…

Results vs expected

Five-on-five · what happened beside the chances created and allowed

Chances	Player	Percentile	Rank
	2.90		21 / 10581st
	2.31		23 / 10579th
	55.6		7 / 10594th

Player	Percentile	Rank
—	—	—
—	—	—
—	—	—

Player	Percentile	Rank
—	—	—
—	—	—
—	—	—

Context · not graded

5v5 goals: —
5v5 expected: 55.5–44.3
EPV added: +9.21

On ice vs off ice

Boston's share with David Pastrnak on the ice against the same team without him.

Share	On ice and off ice	On-minus-off gap in percentage points
xGF%	On ice 55.6% · Off ice unavailable	—
CF%	On ice 55.5% · Off ice unavailable	—
GF%	On ice unavailable · Off ice unavailable	—

On iceOff ice

Scale 40–65% · marker at 50% · right column is the on-minus-off gap in points

Loading model evidence…

Defensive metrics

Five-on-five on-ice suppression; individual events in all situations.

Player	Percentile	Rank
49.91		5 / 10596th
—	—	—
0.059		47 / 10556th

Player	Percentile	Rank
—	—	—
—	—	—
—	—	—

Physical style	Player	Percentile	Rank
	—	—	—
	—	—	—

Context · not graded

Evidence coverage: high danger 21 of 82 games.

Discipline & puck management

Recorded season event counts · all situations

Penaltiesnet —

Taken —Drawn —

Puck eventsnet —

Giveaways —Takeaways —

Blocks: —
Hits: —

Both penalty counts cover 28 of 82 games with every drawn role recorded.

Loading defensive evidence…

SituationChancesViewShot type

Shot map

All 337 attempts

Goal35Shot on goal211Missed shot91Blocked shot0Larger dot = higher xG

Shooting by zone

Hover a row to light it up · click to pin

Zone	Att	G	xG	Goal rate	Exp.	G−xG
Inner slot	51	12	7.2	23.5%	14.1%	+4.8
Left circle	37	6	1.9	16.2%	5.0%	+4.1
Point	61	2	1.4	3.3%	2.4%	+0.6
Right circle	17	1	0.6	5.9%	3.5%	+0.4
Outer slot	39	3	3.0	7.7%	7.6%	0.0
Below goal line	3	0	0.1	0.0%	4.5%	−0.1
High slot	129	11	12.7	8.5%	9.8%	−1.7
All zones	337	35	26.9	10.4%	8.0%	+8.1

Finishing evidence. Scoring 10.4% on chances vs 8.0% expected (+2.4 points), led by inner slot volume and wrist finishing.

Sorted by goals minus expected goals. Goal rate is goals per unblocked attempt against the expected rate.

Shot profile

Context · not graded

On-net rate: 73.0%
Slot share: 53.4%
Average distance: 30.8 ft
Rebound attempts / 60: 0.53

Shot types

337 attempts

Type	Share	Sh%	G−xG
Wrist	52.8%	15.0%	+5.4
Slap	23.7%	10.2%	+0.2
Snap	10.1%	18.5%	+2.1
Backhand	7.1%	5.9%	−0.7
Tip-in	3.9%	25.0%	−0.1
Deflected	1.8%	50.0%	+1.5
Other	0.6%	—	−0.2

Share is context, not a grade. Sh% counts shots on goal only.

High-danger chances

Model goal probability ≥ 0.20

Conversion27.3%+4.2 pts vs expected

Actual27.3%

Expected23.1%

Attempts: 11
Goals: 3
Expected goals: 2.5
G−xG: +0.5

Shot locations

Loading canonical shot events…

Usage by situation

Ice time, share of team ice time, scoring and scoring rate, with where shifts start.

Scope	TOI/GP	Team share	G	A	P	P/60
Five-on-five	14:02	—	19	29	48	2.50
Power play	3:05	—	13	13	26	6.17
Penalty kill	0:01	—	0	0	0	0.00
Other	0:50	—	5	3	8	7.07
All situations	17:58	—	37	45	82	3.34

Where the 82 points come from · All situations

Goals37 · 1.51/60
Primary assists— · —/60
Secondary assists— · —/60

Zone starts — offensive of OZ + DZ

Offensive —Neutral —Defensive —

Shifts

— a game · — average

Zone starts: five-on-five · Shifts: all situations

Usage by situation

Loading usage…

Power play

252:42 recorded ice time · peers need 100 minutes

Share of team PP: —
PP points: 26
Unit xGF / 60: 8.53

Player	Percentile	Rank
6.17		10 / 5383rd
—	—	—
18.99		3 / 5396th
2.28		7 / 5388th
8.53		6 / 5390th
—	—	—

Evidence coverage: goals 13 of 82 games · team time 28 of 82 games.

Penalty kill

2:02 recorded ice time · peers need 100 minutes

Share of team PK: —
SH points: 0
Unit xGA / 60: 9.78

Player	Percentile	Rank
9.78		—
—	—	—
59.02		—
—	—	—
0.00		—

No rank yet

Evidence coverage: goals 1 of 6 games · high danger 1 of 6 games · team time 28 of 82 games.

Loading special teams…

Split	GP	G	A	P	P/GP	5v5 xG share	Team record
Venue
Home	41	16	26	42	1.02	58.7%	28–8–5
Away	41	19	19	38	0.93	52.7%	22–12–7
Rest
Back-to-back	15	4	4	8	0.53	57.1%	6–6–3
1 day of rest	44	25	24	49	1.11	56.1%	27–8–9
2+ days of rest	22	5	17	22	1.00	53.2%	16–6–0
Opponent
vs Eastern	52	24	38	62	1.19	57.1%	33–11–8
vs Western	30	11	7	18	0.60	52.9%	17–9–4
vs playoff teams	39	16	19	35	0.90	53.4%	20–11–8
vs non-playoff teams	43	19	26	45	1.05	57.6%	30–9–4
Recent
Last 10	10	7	3	10	1.00	49.1%	5–3–2

Split	G	A	P	5v5 xG share	5v5 CF%	5v5 GF–GA
Period
1st period	11	12	23	—	—	—
2nd period	9	17	26	—	—	—
3rd period	15	16	31	—	—	—
Overtime	0	0	0	—	—	—
Score state · 5v5 on ice
Leading	—	—	—	52.9%	50.6%	9–11
Tied	—	—	—	55.6%	53.6%	8–9
Trailing	—	—	—	57.6%	64.6%	11–8

Teammate	Pos	TOI together	xG share together	GF–GA	CF%	Him without	Teammate without
Brad Marchand	L	780:37	55.0%	18–21	56.5%	56.3%	43.3%
Patrice Bergeron	C	732:12	58.2%	18–18	58.8%	50.4%	46.2%
Torey Krug	D	454:59	59.2%	11–9	57.0%	52.9%	56.0%
Zdeno Chara	D	420:29	54.3%	10–14	56.6%	56.1%	50.9%
Charlie McAvoy	D	380:03	56.4%	10–13	57.1%	54.9%	54.7%
Brandon Carlo	D	369:32	50.2%	9–6	52.9%	57.7%	50.6%
Kevan Miller	D	245:51	57.4%	7–4	57.0%	54.9%	53.8%
Riley Nash	C	220:24	52.1%	6–5	51.0%	56.1%	52.3%
Matt Grzelcyk	D	182:17	56.7%	3–4	58.2%	55.2%	57.2%
Danton Heinen	L	151:36	58.1%	4–1	57.7%	55.1%	55.9%
Adam McQuaid	D	136:19	52.1%	3–2	53.5%	55.9%	54.8%
Jake DeBrusk	L	91:15	57.2%	2–2	52.0%	55.2%	54.3%

	Opponent	Result		G	A		PPP	+/−	SOG		5v5 on-ice xG share	Game
May 6	@ TBL	L 1–3	24:29	0	0	0	0	-1	8	0.49	79.3%	View →
May 4	vs TBL	L 3–4 OT	18:43	1	0	1	—	-1	6	0.24	36.5%	View →
May 2	vs TBL	L 1–4	19:55	0	1	1	1	0	0	0.03	50.7%	View →
Apr 30	@ TBL	L 2–4	19:16	0	1	1	0	-1	1	0.12	52.0%	View →
Apr 28	@ TBL	W 6–2	15:21	0	4	4	1	4	2	0.12	53.0%	View →
Apr 25	vs TOR	W 7–4	19:36	1	1	2	1	-1	3	0.21	45.4%	View →
Apr 23	@ TOR	L 1–3	19:44	0	0	0	0	-1	1	0.17	64.8%	View →
Apr 21	vs TOR	L 3–4	22:13	0	0	0	—	-2	10	0.64	69.3%	View →
Apr 19	@ TOR	W 3–1	18:49	0	2	2	0	1	2	0.23	41.9%	View →
Apr 16	@ TOR	L 2–4	21:24	0	0	0	—	-2	3	0.08	43.4%	View →
Filtered 10	—	3–7	19:57 avg	2	9	11	—	-4	36	2.34	52.5%	—

Season	GP	G	A	P	SOG	P/GP	5v5 ixG/60	5v5 GP
2025–26	6	3	4	7	22	1.17	1.06	6
2023–24	13	4	4	8	41	0.62	1.00	13
2022–23	7	5	0	5	34	0.71	1.75	7
2021–22	7	3	3	6	39	0.86	1.03	7
2020–21	11	7	8	15	52	1.36	1.64	11
2019–20	10	3	7	10	40	1.00	0.93	10
2018–19	24	9	10	19	82	0.79	0.97	24
2017–18	12	6	14	20	44	1.67	1.07	12
2016–17	6	2	2	4	10	0.67	0.48	6

	Opponent	Result		G	A		PPP	+/−	SOG		5v5 on-ice xG share	Game
Apr 8	vs FLA	L 2–4	21:34	1	0	1	—	-1	7	0.50	61.0%	View →
Apr 7	vs OTT	W 5–2	15:48	1	0	1	1	-1	3	0.03	47.9%	View →
Apr 5	@ FLA	L 2–3	18:56	0	0	0	—	-1	2	0.26	46.9%	View →
Apr 3	@ TBL	L 0–4	16:06	0	0	0	—	-1	1	0.25	60.6%	View →
Apr 1	@ PHI	OTL 3–4 OT	21:30	1	0	1	—	-1	7	0.26	45.6%	View →
Mar 31	vs FLA	W 5–1	16:18	0	1	1	—	0	3	0.19	53.7%	View →
Mar 29	vs TBL	W 4–2	15:14	1	1	2	1	1	4	0.07	24.9%	View →
Mar 27	@ WPG	OTL 4–5 SO	21:36	1	0	1	—	-3	8	0.22	39.6%	View →
Mar 25	@ MIN	W 2–1 OT	18:56	1	0	1	—	1	5	0.16	73.7%	View →
Mar 23	@ DAL	W 3–2	17:30	1	1	2	0	2	4	0.30	9.4%	View →
Filtered 10	—	5–3–2	18:21 avg	7	3	10	—	-4	44	2.24	49.1%	—

Season	Box score · all situations	5v5 individual	5v5 on ice	Season performance
2026–27	30	BOS	10	4	8	12	2	2	34	11.8	3	19:56	14	3	1.54	1.23	10.80	0.089	2.96	2.22	57.2	49.0	50.0	—	—	—
2025–26	29	BOS	77	29	71	100	4	72	261	11.1	10	20:39	—	—	2.71	1.02	8.54	0.081	2.83	2.67	51.4	48.9	—	—	—	—
2024–25	28	BOS	82	43	63	106	0	42	319	13.5	9	20:11	—	—	—	—	—	0.070	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
2023–24	27	BOS	82	47	63	110	21	47	382	12.3	12	19:56	—	—	2.88	1.16	11.87	0.069	3.05	2.68	53.2	50.8	—	—	—	—
2022–23	26	BOS	82	61	52	113	34	38	407	15.0	18	19:34	—	—	3.09	1.43	12.88	0.085	3.39	2.70	55.7	52.6	—	—	—	—
2021–22	25	BOS	72	40	37	77	13	20	312	12.8	15	18:36	—	—	2.59	1.21	12.15	0.073	3.24	2.14	60.3	58.1	—	—	—	—
2020–21	24	BOS	48	20	28	48	10	24	176	11.4	6	18:37	—	—	2.44	0.96	11.00	0.061	2.87	1.84	60.9	60.6	—	—	—	—
2019–20	23	BOS	70	48	47	95	21	40	279	17.2	20	18:58	—	—	3.02	1.04	10.70	0.072	2.71	2.34	53.7	54.2	—	—	—	—
2018–19	22	BOS	66	38	43	81	6	32	235	16.2	17	18:45	—	—	2.46	1.03	9.28	0.078	2.93	2.29	56.1	55.1	—	—	—	—
2017–18	21	BOS	82	35	45	80	10	37	246	14.2	13	17:58	—	—	2.50	0.81	7.87	0.075	2.90	2.31	55.6	55.5	—	—	—	—
2016–17	20	BOS	75	34	36	70	11	34	262	13.0	10	17:59	—	—	2.11	0.96	9.62	0.071	3.08	2.28	57.5	57.0	—	—	—	—
2015–16	19	BOS	51	15	11	26	3	20	108	13.9	0	13:57	—	—	2.06	0.64	8.68	0.059	2.22	2.52	46.8	51.2	—	—	—	—
Career	—	12 seasons	797	414	504	918	135	408	3021	13.7	133	18:50	—	—	—	—	—	0.073	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—

1 award records

Maurice “Rocket” Richard Trophy · 2019–20

Every metric name opens its definition; the full list lives in Metrics.

Traditional statistics cover all situations. Supporting five-on-five analyses use completed games, raw adjustment and exposure from xG model v4. The two samples can differ.

An em dash means unavailable, not zero. A partial season remains partial. Where a panel reports evidence coverage, its rates use only the covered games. History never substitutes a different model, and a missing appearance interrupts a rolling model window.

Shot maps use the same shot model as Game Center and show which model version scored recent shots beside the rink. Older seasons can use earlier model versions. High danger means a model scoring probability of at least 0.20 on an unblocked attempt; for goalies, medium danger is 0.08 to 0.20 and low is below 0.08.

Special-team buckets include the wider recorded man-advantage and man-down states, read from the player’s own team; for a goalie, penalty kill means facing a power play. Their ranks need 100 recorded minutes and at least 30 qualified peers; below 100 minutes, penalty-kill percentiles are provisional. Playoff values have no ranks or percentiles. Team share is player ice time divided by team ice time in that situation, over the games the player dressed. Zone starts describe faceoff-started five-on-five shifts and exclude on-the-fly starts.

Penalties count events, including one for a double minor; bench and served-by roles are excluded, and victimless infractions have no drawn role. EPV added sums changes in the probability that the possessing team scores next; it is not standings points or an isolated player grade. Rolling windows never cross seasons or season types, and a missed game is not a zero-performance appearance. Career rates use summed counts and exposure, never an average of season rates; a missing contributing season withholds its career metric, and Performance begins in 2023–24.

Explore the full methodology →

Season			Box score · all situations												5v5 individual				5v5 on ice					Season performance
Season	Age	Team	GP	G	A	P	+/−	PIM	SOG	Sh%	PPG	TOI/GP	Hits	Blk	P/60	ixG/60	SOG/60	xG/UA	xGF/60	xGA/60	xGF%	CF%	GF%	Perf/60	Grade	Rank
2026–27	30	BOS	10	4	8	12	2	2	34	11.8	3	19:56	14	3	1.54	1.23	10.80	0.089	2.96	2.22	57.2	49.0	50.0	—	—	—
2025–26	29	BOS	77	29	71	100	4	72	261	11.1	10	20:39	—	—	2.71	1.02	8.54	0.081	2.83	2.67	51.4	48.9	—	—	—	—
2024–25	28	BOS	82	43	63	106	0	42	319	13.5	9	20:11	—	—	—	—	—	0.070	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
2023–24	27	BOS	82	47	63	110	21	47	382	12.3	12	19:56	—	—	2.88	1.16	11.87	0.069	3.05	2.68	53.2	50.8	—	—	—	—
2022–23	26	BOS	82	61	52	113	34	38	407	15.0	18	19:34	—	—	3.09	1.43	12.88	0.085	3.39	2.70	55.7	52.6	—	—	—	—
2021–22	25	BOS	72	40	37	77	13	20	312	12.8	15	18:36	—	—	2.59	1.21	12.15	0.073	3.24	2.14	60.3	58.1	—	—	—	—
2020–21	24	BOS	48	20	28	48	10	24	176	11.4	6	18:37	—	—	2.44	0.96	11.00	0.061	2.87	1.84	60.9	60.6	—	—	—	—
2019–20	23	BOS	70	48	47	95	21	40	279	17.2	20	18:58	—	—	3.02	1.04	10.70	0.072	2.71	2.34	53.7	54.2	—	—	—	—
2018–19	22	BOS	66	38	43	81	6	32	235	16.2	17	18:45	—	—	2.46	1.03	9.28	0.078	2.93	2.29	56.1	55.1	—	—	—	—
2017–18	21	BOS	82	35	45	80	10	37	246	14.2	13	17:58	—	—	2.50	0.81	7.87	0.075	2.90	2.31	55.6	55.5	—	—	—	—
2016–17	20	BOS	75	34	36	70	11	34	262	13.0	10	17:59	—	—	2.11	0.96	9.62	0.071	3.08	2.28	57.5	57.0	—	—	—	—
2015–16	19	BOS	51	15	11	26	3	20	108	13.9	0	13:57	—	—	2.06	0.64	8.68	0.059	2.22	2.52	46.8	51.2	—	—	—	—
Career	—	12 seasons	797	414	504	918	135	408	3021	13.7	133	18:50	—	—	—	—	—	0.073	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—

David Pastrnak

Season performanceSelected-season standing and the components behind the scoreCollapse

Season metrics

Season vs reference

Season comparisons

Rolling Radar

Rolling Radar

On-ice impact5v5Elite 55.6% on-ice expected goal share at five-on-five (7th of 105)What the team creates and allows during the player’s five-on-five minutesExplore

Results vs expected

On ice vs off ice

Defense5v5 · AllStrong 2.31 on-ice expected goals against per 60 (23rd of 105)On-ice suppression and individual disciplineExplore

Defensive metrics

Discipline & puck management

Penaltiesnet —

Puck eventsnet —

Shooting & finishingStrong 0.81 individual expected goals per 60 (30th of 105)Where the player shoots, the quality of those chances, and actual versus expected goalsExplore

Shot map

Shooting by zone

Shot profile

Shot types

High-danger chances

Shot locations

Usage & deployment17:58 TOI per game (14:02 at five-on-five · 3:05 PP · 0:01 PK)Scoring by situation, zone starts and workloadExplore

Usage by situation

Where the 82 points come from · All situations

Zone starts — offensive of OZ + DZ

Shifts

Usage by situation

Special teamsPP · PKStrong 6.17 power-play points per 60 (10th of 53)Power play and penalty killExplore

Power play

Penalty kill

FormExplore

Rolling Radar

Splits1.02 points per game at home · 0.93 awayVenue, rest and opponentExplore

By period and score state

Linemates5v5Most often with Brad Marchand: 781 five-on-five minutes, 55.0% xG share togetherWho he plays with at five-on-fiveExplore

Playoffs12 playoff games: 6 goals, 20 points · 96 career playoff gamesExplore

2017–18 playoffs

Playoff games

Every playoff run

Game log82 games · most recent vs FLA, L 2–4: 1 G, 0 AOfficial totals and five-on-five evidenceExplore

Career12 NHL seasons: 797 games, 918 pointsEvery season and a recomputed career lineExplore

Data notesScopes, missing values and model evidenceExplore

2017–18 playoffs

Playoff games

Every playoff run

Defensive metrics

Discipline & puck management

Penaltiesnet —

Puck eventsnet —

Power play

Penalty kill

Results vs expected

On ice vs off ice

Shot map

Shooting by zone

Shot profile

Shot types

High-danger chances

Usage by situation

Where the 82 points come from · All situations

Zone starts — offensive of OZ + DZ

Shifts

By period and score state

Season metrics

Season vs reference