Andreas Englund — 2017–18 stats and season rank | IceSheet
Andreas Englund
Calgary Flames·#8·Defenseman · Shoots left
Age 30 · 6′4″ · 200 lb · Stockholm, SWE
No checked season results are available for this selection.
Games1T-861st in NHL
Goals00.00/GP0.00T-727th in NHL
Assists00.00/GP0.00T-781st in NHL
Points00.00/GP…
5v5 xG share…
Avg TOI11:21…
/
Loading season standing and profile…
Season comparisons
Loading peer comparisons and model evidence…
Optional recent-history profile
Rolling Radar
Loading recent-history profile…
Loading model evidence…
Loading defensive evidence…
Shot locations
Loading canonical shot events…
Usage by situation
Loading usage…
Loading special teams…
T-806th in NHL
T-710th in NHL
No checked season results are available for this selection.
No complete checked component breakdown is available for this selection.
Rolling Radar
Recent NHL history, carried across seasons. The radar compares this broader profile with a fixed position-group reference.
Rolling profile is currently unavailable.
Recent scoring against his own season
Recent scoring against his own season
Loading recent games…
Loading splits…
Loading linemates…
Loading playoff games…
Loading game log…
Loading career ledger…
Every metric name opens its definition; the full list lives in Metrics.
Traditional statistics cover all situations. Supporting five-on-five analyses use completed games, raw adjustment and exposure from xG model v4. The two samples can differ.
An em dash means unavailable, not zero. A partial season remains partial. Where a panel reports evidence coverage, its rates use only the covered games. History never substitutes a different model, and a missing appearance interrupts a rolling model window.
Shot maps use the same shot model as Game Center and show which model version scored recent shots beside the rink. Older seasons can use earlier model versions. High danger means a model scoring probability of at least 0.20 on an unblocked attempt; for goalies, medium danger is 0.08 to 0.20 and low is below 0.08.
Special-team buckets include the wider recorded man-advantage and man-down states, read from the player’s own team; for a goalie, penalty kill means facing a power play. Their ranks need 100 recorded minutes and at least 30 qualified peers; below 100 minutes, penalty-kill percentiles are provisional. Playoff values have no ranks or percentiles. Team share is player ice time divided by team ice time in that situation, over the games the player dressed. Zone starts describe faceoff-started five-on-five shifts and exclude on-the-fly starts.
Penalties count events, including one for a double minor; bench and served-by roles are excluded, and victimless infractions have no drawn role. EPV added sums changes in the probability that the possessing team scores next; it is not standings points or an isolated player grade. Rolling windows never cross seasons or season types, and a missed game is not a zero-performance appearance. Career rates use summed counts and exposure, never an average of season rates; a missing contributing season withholds its career metric, and Performance begins in 2023–24.
Most often with Fredrik Claesson: 7 five-on-five minutes, 64.8% xG share together
Most often with Fredrik Claesson: 7 five-on-five minutes, 64.8% xG share together
Five-on-five · time together from shift charts (10:43 of his 5v5 ice time) · xG share together and apart
Teammate
Pos
TOI together
xG share together
GF–GA
CF%
Him without
Teammate without
Fredrik Claesson
D
7:14
64.8%
1–0
37.5%
35.0%
43.8%
Ryan Dzingel
C
4:51
64.8%
1–0
42.9%
35.0%
47.7%
Matt Duchene
C
4:00
40.3%
1–0
20.0%
73.1%
47.0%
Mike Hoffman
C
3:20
54.6%
1–0
33.3%
45.6%
45.7%
Colin White
C
2:49
16.1%
0–0
16.7%
61.5%
36.3%
Bobby Ryan
R
2:40
—
0–0
0.0%
56.5%
49.2%
Max McCormick
L
2:34
—
0–0
33.3%
50.8%
46.3%
Zack Smith
C
2:32
75.7%
1–0
80.0%
40.9%
45.9%
Magnus Paajarvi
L
2:24
56.1%
1–0
66.7%
46.6%
42.9%
Jean-Gabriel Pageau
C
2:08
14.5%
0–0
50.0%
55.1%
44.9%
Alexandre Burrows
R
2:05
—
1–0
75.0%
43.8%
46.9%
Thomas Chabot
D
1:59
91.6%
1–0
83.3%
40.2%
47.0%
Without columns are five-on-five xG share apart: him on the ice without that teammate, and the teammate without him (with this club). Bars are centred on an even 50%.
0.00 individual expected goals per 60
0.00 individual expected goals per 60
24.3%
24.3% on-ice expected goal share at five-on-five
24.3% on-ice expected goal share at five-on-five
3.42 on-ice expected goals against per 60
3.42 on-ice expected goals against per 60
Defensive metrics
Five-on-five on-ice suppression; individual events in all situations.
Suppression
Player
Percentile
Rank
78.14
—
0.00
—
0.061
—
Puck management
Player
Percentile
Rank
5.29
—
5.29
—
0.00
—
Physical style
Player
Percentile
Rank
10.57
—
15.86
—
Context · not gradedNo rank yet
Player value: 78.14 Peer range: 47.22 – 78.14 / 60
MeanAndreas Englund
Lower (better)Higher
Player 78.14 · mean 57.40. Lower raw values are better. Needs 20 appearances and 300 five-on-five minutes (full season: 20 and 300).
On-ice attempts against per 60, including blocks.
Needs 20 appearances and 300 five-on-five minutes (full season: 20 and 300).
Discipline & puck management
Recorded season event counts · all situations
Penaltiesnet 0
Taken 0Drawn 0
Puck eventsnet 0
Giveaways 1Takeaways 1
Blocks
2
all situations
Hits
3
all situations
Elite 0.00 expected goals against per 60 on the penalty kill
Elite 0.00 expected goals against per 60 on the penalty kill
Power play
0:00 recorded ice time · peers need 100 minutes
Share of team PP
0.0%
in games dressed
PP points
0
goals + assists
Unit xGF / 60
—
team without: 5.16
Power play rates
Player
Percentile
Rank
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Player value: — Peer range: 1.64 – 9.03 / 60
Mean
Lower Higher (better)
Player — · mean 4.49. Higher raw values rank higher. Complete recorded inputs are unavailable.
Recorded goals plus assists per 60 in this scope; widened power-play and penalty-kill scopes.
Complete recorded inputs are unavailable.
Penalty kill
0:27 recorded ice time · peers need 100 minutes
Share of team PK
7.4%
in games dressed
SH points
0
goals + assists
Unit xGA / 60
0.00
team without: 3.63
Penalty kill rates
Player
Percentile
Rank
0.00
—
—
—
—
133.33
—
—
—
—
0.00
—
No rank yet
Player value: 0.00 Peer range: 0.00 – 8.75 / 60
MeanAndreas Englund
Lower (better)Higher
Player 0.00 · mean 6.93. Lower raw values are better. Provisional PK percentile: under 100 recorded minutes. Smaller samples are less reliable; official ranks need 100 minutes.
Raw on-ice expected goals against per 60; the Season metrics sample.
Provisional PK percentile: under 100 recorded minutes. Smaller samples are less reliable; official ranks need 100 minutes.
Evidence coverage: goals 0 of 1 games · high danger 0 of 1 games.
11:21 TOI per game (10:45 at five-on-five · 0:27 PK)
11:21 TOI per game (10:45 at five-on-five · 0:27 PK)
Results vs expected
Five-on-five · what happened beside the chances created and allowed
Chances
Player
Percentile
Rank
1.10
—
3.42
—
24.3
—
Goals
Player
Percentile
Rank
11.16
—
0.00
—
100.0
—
Luck & variance
Player
Percentile
Rank
33.3
—
100.0
—
133.33
—
Context · not gradedNo rank yet
Player value: 1.10 Peer range: 1.10 – 3.48 / 60
MeanAndreas Englund
Lower Higher (better)
Player 1.10 · mean 2.52. Higher raw values rank higher. Needs 20 appearances and 300 five-on-five minutes (full season: 20 and 300).
Raw on-ice expected goals for per 60; the Season metrics sample.
Needs 20 appearances and 300 five-on-five minutes (full season: 20 and 300).
5v5 goals
2–0
for–against
5v5 expected
0.2–0.6
xG for–against
EPV added
-0.01
1 attributed games · all situations
On ice vs off ice
Ottawa's share with Andreas Englund on the ice against the same team without him.
Share
On ice and off ice
On-minus-off gap in percentage points
xGF%
On ice 24.3%; off ice 40.4%.
40.424.3
-16.1
CF%
On ice 26.3%; off ice 40.6%.
40.626.3
-14.3
GF%
On ice 100.0%; off ice 0.0%.
0.0100.0
+100.0
On iceOff ice
Scale 0–100% · marker at 50% · right column is the on-minus-off gap in points
0 points in the last 1 game (0.00 per game vs 0.00 this season)
0 points in the last 1 game (0.00 per game vs 0.00 this season)
Venue, rest and opponent
Venue, rest and opponent
1 game · most recent at BOS, L 2–5: 0 G, 0 A
1 game · most recent at BOS, L 2–5: 0 G, 0 A
No shot events are available for this selection.
Usage by situation
Ice time, share of team ice time, scoring and scoring rate, with where shifts start.
Scope
TOI/GP
Team share
G
A
P
P/60
Five-on-five
10:45
22.3%
0
0
0
0.00
Penalty kill
0:27
7.4%
0
0
0
0.00
All situations
11:21
18.9%
0
0
0
0.00
Where the 0 points come from · All situations
Goals0 · 0.00/60
Primary assists0 · 0.00/60
Secondary assists0 · 0.00/60
Zone starts 40.0% offensive of OZ + DZ
Offensive 28.6%Neutral 28.6%Defensive 42.9%
Shifts
16.0 a game · 0:43 average
Zone starts: five-on-five · Shifts: all situations
9 NHL seasons: 205 games, 20 points
9 NHL seasons: 205 games, 20 points
Totals cover all situations; rates are five-on-five.
Elite90+Strong70–89Average30–69Weak10–29Poor<10No rank yetBar length is the peer percentile, so longer is always better · tick at the 50th
Player value: 0.00 Peer range: 0.00 – 1.50 / 60
MeanAndreas Englund
Lower Higher (better)
Player 0.00 · mean 0.76. Higher raw values rank higher. Needs 20 appearances and 300 five-on-five minutes (full season: 20 and 300); shot quality and finishing also need 75 unblocked attempts.
Recorded five-on-five goals plus assists per 60 minutes.
Needs 20 appearances and 300 five-on-five minutes (full season: 20 and 300); shot quality and finishing also need 75 unblocked attempts.
How to read these comparisons
Player values are recorded season results. Peer averages are arithmetic means of qualified players in the selected group; each row uses the same peers for its average and rank. Ranks use unrounded values, with tied players sharing a rank and the next rank skipped. Lower xG against ranks better. Bar colours are the five performance tiers; context rows are blue and not graded. Differences from the average describe the season, not isolated player impact.
Goals above expected is the raw goals-minus-xG rate, without the shrinkage used in the older finishing comparison. On-ice measures include teammates, opponents and deployment. These recorded metrics describe different quantities from the adjusted Season score components beside them.
Skaters need 20 appearances and 300 five-on-five minutes; quality and finishing also need 75 unblocked attempts. Early in a season these minimums scale down with games played so far. At least 30 peers must qualify. Playoff ranks are withheld. A reviewed axis whose own evidence fails is withheld and shown with its reason rather than ranked. These workload rules do not express statistical confidence.
Position uses the NHL listed primary position available now; it does not establish historical position or actual deployment. Broad groups are forwards, defence and goalies. This version uses the current model’s covered games only.
Season vs reference
Per game · all situations
Metric2017–18ReferenceDiff
0.000.000.00
0.000.000.00
0.000.000.00
0.000.60-0.60
Reference: 2016–17 · 5 games.
Each game against his own season
Points in each game, coloured by how good the game wasTrailing 10 games, per gameSeason 0
