Jack Eichel

Vegas Golden Knights#9Center Shoots right

Age 29 · 6′2″ · 205 lb · North Chelmsford, Massachusetts, USA

No checked season results are available for this selection.

Games81T-86th in NHL

Goals240.30/GPT-57th in NHL

Assists320.40/GPT-73rd in NHL

Points560.69/GPT-58th in NHL

5v5 xG share45.3%159th of 194…

Career awards

No checked season results are available for this selection.

No complete checked component breakdown is available for this selection.

Loading season standing and profile…

Season metrics

2015–16 · five-on-five · vs 194 positional peers

Player	Percentile	Rank
1.47		83 / 19458th
0.61		75 / 19462nd
—	—	—

Shooting & finishing	Player	Percentile	Rank
	0.67		80 / 19459th
	8.52		21 / 19490th
	15.07		18 / 19491st
	0.057		141 / 15710th
	-0.06		75 / 15753rd

Elite90+Strong70–89Average30–69Weak10–29Poor<10Bar length is the peer percentile, so longer is always better · tick at the 50th

How to read these comparisons

Player values are recorded season results. Peer averages are arithmetic means of qualified players in the selected group; each row uses the same peers for its average and rank. Ranks use unrounded values, with tied players sharing a rank and the next rank skipped. Lower xG against ranks better. Bar colours are the five performance tiers; context rows are blue and not graded. Differences from the average describe the season, not isolated player impact.

Goals above expected is the raw goals-minus-xG rate, without the shrinkage used in the older finishing comparison. On-ice measures include teammates, opponents and deployment. These recorded metrics describe different quantities from the adjusted Season score components beside them.

Skaters need 20 appearances and 300 five-on-five minutes; quality and finishing also need 75 unblocked attempts. Early in a season these minimums scale down with games played so far. At least 30 peers must qualify. Playoff ranks are withheld. A reviewed axis whose own evidence fails is withheld and shown with its reason rather than ranked. These workload rules do not express statistical confidence.

Position uses the NHL listed primary position available now; it does not establish historical position or actual deployment. Broad groups are forwards, defence and goalies. This version uses the current model’s covered games only.

Season vs reference

Reference

Per game · all situations

Metric2015–16ReferenceDiff

0.30——

0.40——

0.69——

2.94——

First covered season: no earlier personal reference is available.

Season comparisons

Loading peer comparisons and model evidence…

Optional recent-history profile

Rolling Radar

Recent NHL history, carried across seasons. The radar compares this broader profile with a fixed position-group reference.

Rolling profile is currently unavailable.

Rolling Radar

Loading recent-history profile…

Results vs expected

Five-on-five · what happened beside the chances created and allowed

Chances	Player	Percentile	Rank
	2.12		133 / 19432nd
	2.56		155 / 19420th
	45.3		159 / 19418th

Player	Percentile	Rank
—	—	—
—	—	—
—	—	—

Player	Percentile	Rank
—	—	—
—	—	—
—	—	—

Context · not graded

5v5 goals: —
5v5 expected: 41.8–50.4
EPV added: +3.86

On ice vs off ice

Buffalo's share with Jack Eichel on the ice against the same team without him.

Share	On ice and off ice	On-minus-off gap in percentage points
xGF%	On ice 45.3% · Off ice unavailable	—
CF%	On ice 46.6% · Off ice unavailable	—
GF%	On ice unavailable · Off ice unavailable	—

On iceOff ice

Scale 40–65% · marker at 50% · right column is the on-minus-off gap in points

Loading model evidence…

Defensive metrics

Five-on-five on-ice suppression; individual events in all situations.

Player	Percentile	Rank
57.28		155 / 19420th
—	—	—
0.058		81 / 19459th

Player	Percentile	Rank
—	—	—
—	—	—
—	—	—

Physical style	Player	Percentile	Rank
	—	—	—
	—	—	—

Context · not graded

Evidence coverage: high danger 31 of 81 games.

Discipline & puck management

Recorded season event counts · all situations

Penaltiesnet —

Taken —Drawn —

Puck eventsnet —

Giveaways —Takeaways —

Blocks: —
Hits: —

Both penalty counts cover 35 of 81 games with every drawn role recorded.

Loading defensive evidence…

SituationChancesViewShot type

Shot map

All 328 attempts

Goal24Shot on goal214Missed shot90Blocked shot0Larger dot = higher xG

Shooting by zone

Hover a row to light it up · click to pin

Zone	Att	G	xG	Goal rate	Exp.	G−xG
Outer slot	22	3	1.4	13.6%	6.3%	+1.6
Left circle	30	2	0.7	6.7%	2.4%	+1.3
High slot	81	9	7.7	11.1%	9.5%	+1.3
Point	92	4	3.2	4.3%	3.4%	+0.8
Below goal line	2	0	0.0	0.0%	1.4%	0.0
Inner slot	56	6	7.0	10.7%	12.6%	−1.0
Right circle	45	0	1.4	0.0%	3.1%	−1.4
All zones	328	24	21.5	7.3%	6.5%	+2.5

Finishing evidence. Scoring 7.3% on chances vs 6.5% expected (+0.8 points), led by outer slot volume and slap finishing.

Sorted by goals minus expected goals. Goal rate is goals per unblocked attempt against the expected rate.

Shot profile

Context · not graded

On-net rate: 72.6%
Slot share: 41.8%
Average distance: 34.2 ft
Rebound attempts / 60: 0.19

Shot types

328 attempts

Type	Share	Sh%	G−xG
Wrist	60.4%	7.6%	−0.8
Snap	13.7%	12.9%	+1.2
Backhand	11.3%	6.7%	−1.0
Slap	7.0%	20.0%	+1.4
Deflected	2.7%	20.0%	−0.1
Wrap-around	2.7%	12.5%	+0.5
Other	2.1%	—	+1.4

Share is context, not a grade. Sh% counts shots on goal only.

High-danger chances

Model goal probability ≥ 0.20

Conversion33.3%+3.6 pts vs expected

Actual33.3%

Expected29.8%

Attempts: 12
Goals: 4
Expected goals: 3.6
G−xG: +0.4

Shot locations

Loading canonical shot events…

Usage by situation

Ice time, share of team ice time, scoring and scoring rate, with where shifts start.

Scope	TOI/GP	Team share	G	A	P	P/60
Five-on-five	14:36	—	12	17	29	1.47
Power play	3:03	—	8	13	21	5.10
Penalty kill	0:23	—	0	0	0	0.00
Other	1:06	—	5	2	7	4.73
All situations	19:07	—	25	32	57	2.21

Where the 57 points come from · All situations

Goals25 · 0.97/60
Primary assists— · —/60
Secondary assists— · —/60

Zone starts — offensive of OZ + DZ

Offensive —Neutral —Defensive —

Shifts

— a game · — average

Zone starts: five-on-five · Shifts: all situations

Faceoffs

All situations · zones are read from his side of the draw · values only; no peer ranks yet

Win %: 41.0%
Draws per game: 12.10
Offensive zone: 42.0%
Defensive zone: 39.4%
Power play: 37.0%

Usage by situation

Loading usage…

Power play

247:00 recorded ice time · peers need 100 minutes

Share of team PP: —
PP points: 21
Unit xGF / 60: 6.51

Player	Percentile	Rank
5.10		24 / 10177th
—	—	—
11.42		36 / 10165th
1.01		78 / 10123rd
6.51		50 / 10151st
—	—	—

Evidence coverage: goals 15 of 78 games · team time 35 of 81 games.

Penalty kill

30:30 recorded ice time · peers need 100 minutes

Share of team PK: —
SH points: 0
Unit xGA / 60: 6.08

Player	Percentile	Rank
6.08		—
—	—	—
94.43		—
—	—	—
1.36		—

No rank yet

Evidence coverage: goals 7 of 39 games · high danger 7 of 39 games · team time 35 of 81 games.

Loading special teams…

Split	GP	G	A	P	P/GP	5v5 xG share	Team record
Venue
Home	41	15	14	29	0.71	48.8%	16–19–6
Away	40	9	18	27	0.68	42.1%	19–16–5
Rest
Back-to-back	14	4	4	8	0.57	47.8%	6–6–2
1 day of rest	42	13	15	28	0.67	42.5%	19–17–6
2+ days of rest	24	6	13	19	0.79	49.0%	10–11–3
Opponent
vs Eastern	53	17	22	39	0.74	47.4%	23–24–6
vs Western	28	7	10	17	0.61	41.4%	12–11–5
vs playoff teams	44	7	15	22	0.50	42.7%	14–24–6
vs non-playoff teams	37	17	17	34	0.92	48.3%	21–11–5
Recent
Last 10	10	2	6	8	0.80	53.9%	7–2–1

Teammate	Pos	TOI together	xG share together	GF–GA	CF%	Him without	Teammate without
Rasmus Ristolainen	D	417:07	45.2%	18–12	46.5%	47.7%	44.0%
Evander Kane	L	415:01	47.0%	8–12	49.9%	46.6%	48.1%
Sam Reinhart	C	390:20	52.9%	9–13	51.3%	43.4%	49.2%
Jake McCabe	D	383:16	47.8%	5–15	45.3%	46.3%	50.0%
Josh Gorges	D	358:24	43.1%	18–13	45.7%	48.4%	42.6%
Zach Bogosian	D	352:59	38.6%	7–15	45.2%	50.3%	49.6%
Zemgus Girgensons	C	262:38	47.9%	11–11	48.5%	46.5%	51.1%
Cody Franson	D	254:17	48.6%	6–11	45.8%	46.3%	46.2%
Mark Pysyk	D	241:20	52.1%	6–10	49.7%	45.4%	52.1%
Jamie McGinn	L	239:28	46.5%	9–4	45.7%	46.9%	48.4%
Brian Gionta	R	227:03	41.2%	11–15	42.0%	48.2%	47.7%
Matt Moulson	L	202:26	47.0%	6–13	47.9%	46.7%	47.9%

	Opponent	Result		G	A		PPP	+/−	SOG		5v5 on-ice xG share	Game
Apr 9	@ NYI	W 4–3 OT	19:40	0	1	1	—	-1	3	0.36	65.3%	View →
Apr 8	vs CBJ	L 1–4	21:51	0	1	1	—	-2	2	0.10	68.9%	View →
Apr 5	@ NJD	W 3–1	17:28	1	1	2	1	1	2	0.00	27.9%	View →
Apr 2	@ NYR	W 4–3	16:27	0	1	1	—	0	1	0.09	49.1%	View →
Mar 31	vs TOR	W 4–1	18:12	0	1	1	1	-1	6	0.36	48.4%	View →
Mar 29	@ PIT	OTL 4–5 SO	20:52	0	0	0	—	0	3	0.01	23.4%	View →
Mar 28	@ DET	L 2–3	20:03	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.00	29.4%	View →
Mar 26	vs WPG	W 3–2	17:33	1	0	1	0	2	2	0.13	72.6%	View →
Mar 22	@ CAR	W 3–2	18:22	0	0	0	0	-2	0	0.01	37.1%	View →
Mar 18	vs OTT	W 3–1	18:28	0	1	1	—	1	2	0.23	75.5%	View →
Filtered 10	—	7–2–1	18:54 avg	2	6	8	—	-2	22	1.29	53.9%	—

Season			Box score · all situations												5v5 individual				5v5 on ice					Season performance
Season	Age	Team	GP	G	A	P	+/−	PIM	SOG	Sh%	PPG	TOI/GP	Hits	Blk	P/60	ixG/60	SOG/60	xG/UA	xGF/60	xGA/60	xGF%	CF%	GF%	Perf/60	Grade	Rank
2026–27	30	VGK	11	5	13	18	8	2	28	17.9	0	19:54	3	7	3.24	0.74	8.91	0.067	2.98	2.41	55.3	55.0	73.3	—	—	—
2025–26	29	VGK	74	27	63	90	23	18	260	10.4	1	21:12	—	—	2.61	0.87	9.60	0.067	3.21	2.26	58.7	53.8	—	—	—	—
2024–25	28	VGK	77	28	66	94	32	8	233	12.0	5	20:32	—	—	2.45	0.87	8.03	0.081	3.25	2.52	56.3	51.5	—	—	—	—
2023–24	27	VGK	63	31	37	68	4	27	278	11.2	11	20:31	—	—	2.40	0.94	11.60	0.064	2.77	2.34	54.3	50.2	—	—	—	—
2022–23	26	VGK	67	27	39	66	26	6	223	12.1	2	18:46	—	—	2.45	0.90	9.79	0.075	3.09	2.67	53.6	48.9	—	—	—	—
2021–22	25	VGK	34	14	11	25	3	10	133	10.5	3	19:24	—	—	1.75	1.03	11.53	0.076	2.86	2.59	52.5	51.2	—	—	—	—
2020–21	24	BUF	21	2	16	18	-9	6	61	3.3	1	20:30	—	—	1.46	0.56	6.94	0.059	2.37	2.18	52.1	55.0	—	—	—	—
2019–20	23	BUF	68	36	42	78	5	34	227	15.9	11	22:06	—	—	1.99	0.72	7.16	0.070	2.41	2.46	49.5	50.5	—	—	—	—
2018–19	22	BUF	77	28	54	82	-11	26	303	9.2	8	20:26	—	—	2.43	0.84	10.43	0.065	3.05	2.81	52.1	51.2	—	—	—	—
2017–18	21	BUF	67	25	39	64	-25	32	246	10.2	3	20:09	—	—	2.04	0.70	9.28	0.058	2.32	2.63	46.9	49.1	—	—	—	—
2016–17	20	BUF	61	24	33	57	-13	22	249	9.6	10	19:55	—	—	1.76	0.76	10.78	0.055	2.49	2.74	47.6	47.3	—	—	—	—
2015–16	19	BUF	81	24	32	56	-16	22	238	10.1	8	19:07	—	—	1.47	0.67	8.52	0.057	2.12	2.56	45.3	46.6	—	—	—	—
Career	—	12 seasons	701	271	445	716	27	213	2479	10.9	63	20:15	—	—	2.14	0.81	9.40	0.066	2.74	2.54	51.9	50.2	—	—	—	—

Teammate	Pos	TOI together	xG share together	GF–GA	CF%	Him without	Teammate without
Rasmus Ristolainen	D	417:07	45.2%	18–12	46.5%	47.7%	44.0%
Evander Kane	L	415:01	47.0%	8–12	49.9%	46.6%	48.1%
Sam Reinhart	C	390:20	52.9%	9–13	51.3%	43.4%	49.2%
Jake McCabe	D	383:16	47.8%	5–15	45.3%	46.3%	50.0%
Josh Gorges	D	358:24	43.1%	18–13	45.7%	48.4%	42.6%
Zach Bogosian	D	352:59	38.6%	7–15	45.2%	50.3%	49.6%
Zemgus Girgensons	C	262:38	47.9%	11–11	48.5%	46.5%	51.1%
Cody Franson	D	254:17	48.6%	6–11	45.8%	46.3%	46.2%
Mark Pysyk	D	241:20	52.1%	6–10	49.7%	45.4%	52.1%
Jamie McGinn	L	239:28	46.5%	9–4	45.7%	46.9%	48.4%
Brian Gionta	R	227:03	41.2%	11–15	42.0%	48.2%	47.7%
Matt Moulson	L	202:26	47.0%	6–13	47.9%	46.7%	47.9%

Split	G	A	P	5v5 xG share	5v5 CF%	5v5 GF–GA
Period
1st period	4	6	10	—	—	—
2nd period	7	20	27	—	—	—
3rd period	12	6	18	—	—	—
Overtime	1	0	1	—	—	—
Score state · 5v5 on ice
Leading	—	—	—	50.4%	45.3%	6–9
Tied	—	—	—	45.2%	47.4%	18–19
Trailing	—	—	—	46.6%	48.1%	11–15

Season	GP	G	A	P	SOG	P/GP	5v5 ixG/60	5v5 GP
2025–26	22	2	20	22	52	1.00	0.52	22
2024–25	11	1	9	10	30	0.91	0.69	11
2023–24	7	3	4	7	23	1.00	0.92	7
2022–23	22	6	20	26	71	1.18	0.93	22

Jack Eichel

Season performanceSelected-season standing and the components behind the scoreCollapse

Season metrics

Season vs reference

Season comparisons

Rolling Radar

Rolling Radar

On-ice impact5v5Weak 45.3% on-ice expected goal share at five-on-five (159th of 194)What the team creates and allows during the player’s five-on-five minutesExplore

Results vs expected

On ice vs off ice

Defense5v5 · AllWeak 2.56 on-ice expected goals against per 60 (155th of 194)On-ice suppression and individual disciplineExplore

Defensive metrics

Discipline & puck management

Penaltiesnet —

Puck eventsnet —

Shooting & finishingAverage 0.67 individual expected goals per 60 (80th of 194)Where the player shoots, the quality of those chances, and actual versus expected goalsExplore

Shot map

Shooting by zone

Shot profile

Shot types

High-danger chances

Shot locations

Usage & deployment19:07 TOI per game (14:36 at five-on-five · 3:03 PP · 0:23 PK)Scoring by situation, zone starts and workloadExplore

Usage by situation

Where the 57 points come from · All situations

Zone starts — offensive of OZ + DZ

Shifts

Faceoffs

Usage by situation

Special teamsPP · PKStrong 5.10 power-play points per 60 (24th of 101)Power play and penalty killExplore

Power play

Penalty kill

FormExplore

Rolling Radar

Splits0.71 points per game at home · 0.68 awayVenue, rest and opponentExplore

By period and score state

Linemates5v5Most often with Rasmus Ristolainen: 417 five-on-five minutes, 45.2% xG share togetherWho he plays with at five-on-fiveExplore

PlayoffsDid not play in these playoffs · 62 career playoff gamesExplore

Every playoff run

Game log81 games · most recent at NYI, W 4–3: 0 G, 1 AOfficial totals and five-on-five evidenceExplore

Career12 NHL seasons: 701 games, 716 pointsEvery season and a recomputed career lineExplore

Data notesScopes, missing values and model evidenceExplore

Every playoff run

Defensive metrics

Discipline & puck management

Penaltiesnet —

Puck eventsnet —

Power play

Penalty kill

Results vs expected

On ice vs off ice

Shot map

Shooting by zone

Shot profile

Shot types

High-danger chances

Usage by situation

Where the 57 points come from · All situations

Zone starts — offensive of OZ + DZ

Shifts

Faceoffs

By period and score state

Season metrics

Season vs reference