Artemi Panarin

Los Angeles Kings#10Left wing Shoots right

Age 34 · 6′0″ · 176 lb · Korkino, RUS

Strong offense, finishing, and playmaking — highlighted by 2.67 on-ice expected goals for per 60 (39th of 112).

Season grade: A+; #46 of 403 qualified F89th percentile; Performance / 600.1927/78 GP

Games78T-194th in NHL

Goals280.36/GP▼0.10T-53rd in NHL

Assists560.72/GP▲0.07T-17th in NHL

Points841.08/GP▼0.0421st in NHL…

5v5 xG share52.4%38th of 112…

Avg TOI20:5193rd in NHL…

Career awards

Qualified · 2025–26 forwards

PlayerPeer average

What each component is built from

Offense: Expected goals for while the player is on the ice
Defense: Expected goals against while the player is on the ice (fewer is better)
Chance creation: Expected goals from the player’s own shots
Finishing: Goals minus expected goals on the player’s own shots
Assisting: Primary assists plus half of secondary assists

Each is measured against expectation, per 60 rated minutes: plus is above, minus below.

How this is calculated

Score breakdown

Component	Weight	Scaled	Contribution
Offense	25%	0.312	+0.078
Defense	25%	0.112	+0.028
Chance creation	20%	0.035	+0.007
Finishing	10%	0.139	+0.014
Assisting	20%	0.332	+0.066
Performance rate			0.193

Per 60 rated minutes, over the scored appearances. Each component is scaled separately, then weighted; the contributions add to the performance rate at full precision, so rounded figures may differ.

Scoring

Season grade is the qualified peer percentile on the same letter bands as Game Grade — A+ ≥88, A ≥78, A− ≥68, B+ ≥58, B ≥50, B− ≥42, C+ ≥35, C ≥28, C− ≥22, D ≥15, F below 15 — and needs qualification plus at least 30 eligible peers. The letter describes this season’s performance, not permanent ability.

Comparisons

Rank and component percentiles compare this season’s qualified forwards on unrounded rates over every checked appearance; Game Grade compares one appearance with frozen historical games.

Component percentiles are never averaged into the score. Recent history is optional, from up to three completed prior seasons; small samples are provisional.

Coverage

Qualification: 14 covered appearances, 226.5 rated minutes, and 90% appearance and workload coverage. Minimums advance with league progress; valid low-sample results stay visible.

Rated minutes exclude play with a goalie pulled: 7.3 min excluded; official TOI 567.3 min.

Coverage: partial. Updated Oct 17, 2026.

Method

Five weighted components add to the performance rate. Five-on-five offense and defense account for recorded teammates, opponents and game state, so shared on-ice results are not isolated individual ability. Finishing is scored against the shot model’s historical-shooter expectation and assisting counts primary assists plus half of secondary assists; both use the strength baseline, chance creation its positional baseline.

Loading season standing and profile…

Season metrics

2025–26 · five-on-five · vs 112 positional peers

Player	Percentile	Rank
2.43		9 / 11293rd
0.95		22 / 11281st
—	—	—

Shooting & finishing	Player	Percentile	Rank
	0.68		70 / 11238th
	6.35		53 / 11253rd
	14.27		33 / 11271st
	0.067		72 / 9424th
	0.27		8 / 9492nd

Elite90+Strong70–89Average30–69Weak10–29Poor<10Bar length is the peer percentile, so longer is always better · tick at the 50th

How to read these comparisons

Player values are recorded season results. Peer averages are arithmetic means of qualified players in the selected group; each row uses the same peers for its average and rank. Ranks use unrounded values, with tied players sharing a rank and the next rank skipped. Lower xG against ranks better. Bar colours are the five performance tiers; context rows are blue and not graded. Differences from the average describe the season, not isolated player impact.

Goals above expected is the raw goals-minus-xG rate, without the shrinkage used in the older finishing comparison. On-ice measures include teammates, opponents and deployment. These recorded metrics describe different quantities from the adjusted Season score components beside them.

Skaters need 20 appearances and 300 five-on-five minutes; quality and finishing also need 75 unblocked attempts. Early in a season these minimums scale down with games played so far. At least 30 peers must qualify. Playoff ranks are withheld. A reviewed axis whose own evidence fails is withheld and shown with its reason rather than ranked. These workload rules do not express statistical confidence.

Position uses the NHL listed primary position available now; it does not establish historical position or actual deployment. Broad groups are forwards, defence and goalies. This version uses the current model’s covered games only.

Season vs reference

Reference

Per game · all situations

Metric2025–26ReferenceDiff

0.360.46-0.10

0.720.65+0.07

1.081.11-0.04

2.872.96-0.09

Reference: 2024–25 · 80 games.

Season comparisons

Loading peer comparisons and model evidence…

Optional recent-history profile

Rolling Radar

Recent NHL history, carried across seasons. The radar compares this broader profile with a fixed position-group reference.

Rolling profile is currently unavailable.

Rolling Radar

Loading recent-history profile…

Results vs expected

Five-on-five · what happened beside the chances created and allowed

Chances	Player	Percentile	Rank
	2.67		39 / 11266th
	2.43		48 / 11258th
	52.4		38 / 11267th

Player	Percentile	Rank
—	—	—
—	—	—
—	—	—

Player	Percentile	Rank
—	—	—
—	—	—
—	—	—

Context · not graded

5v5 goals: —
5v5 expected: 56.0–51.0
EPV added: +5.40

On ice vs off ice

Team share with Artemi Panarin on the ice against the same team without him.

Share	On ice and off ice	On-minus-off gap in percentage points
xGF%	On ice 52.4% · Off ice unavailable	—
CF%	On ice 54.3% · Off ice unavailable	—
GF%	On ice unavailable · Off ice unavailable	—

On iceOff ice

Scale 40–65% · marker at 50% · right column is the on-minus-off gap in points

Loading model evidence…

Defensive metrics

Five-on-five on-ice suppression; individual events in all situations.

Player	Percentile	Rank
53.59		28 / 11276th
—	—	—
0.063		74 / 11234th

Player	Percentile	Rank
—	—	—
—	—	—
—	—	—

Physical style	Player	Percentile	Rank
	—	—	—
	—	—	—

Context · not graded

Evidence coverage: high danger 50 of 78 games.

Discipline & puck management

Recorded season event counts · all situations

Penaltiesnet —

Taken —Drawn —

Puck eventsnet —

Giveaways —Takeaways —

Blocks: —
Hits: —

Both penalty counts cover 51 of 78 games with every drawn role recorded.

Loading defensive evidence…

SituationChancesViewShot type

Shot map

All 364 attempts

Goal28Shot on goal196Missed shot140Blocked shot0Larger dot = higher xG

Shooting by zone

Hover a row to light it up · click to pin

Zone	Att	G	xG	Goal rate	Exp.	G−xG
Right circle	18	2	0.7	11.1%	3.8%	+1.3
Below goal line	1	1	0.1	100.0%	6.8%	+0.9
Inner slot	31	4	3.8	12.9%	12.4%	+0.2
Outer slot	17	1	1.5	5.9%	8.6%	−0.5
Point	114	5	6.2	4.4%	5.4%	−1.2
Left circle	43	2	3.2	4.7%	7.6%	−1.2
High slot	140	13	14.5	9.3%	10.3%	−1.5
All zones	364	28	30.0	7.7%	8.2%	−2.0

Finishing evidence. Scoring 7.7% on chances vs 8.2% expected (−0.5 points), with the largest shortfall in the high slot.

Sorted by goals minus expected goals. Goal rate is goals per unblocked attempt against the expected rate.

Shot profile

Context · not graded

On-net rate: 61.5%
Slot share: 47.0%
Average distance: 36.7 ft
Rebound attempts / 60: 0.63

Shot types

364 attempts

Type	Share	Sh%	G−xG
Wrist	53.3%	10.4%	−2.4
Slap	19.8%	8.1%	−1.7
Snap	18.1%	21.3%	+3.0
Backhand	3.8%	12.5%	−0.5
Tip-in	3.6%	20.0%	0.0
Other	0.8%	—	−0.2
Bat	0.5%	—	−0.1

Share is context, not a grade. Sh% counts shots on goal only.

High-danger chances

Model goal probability ≥ 0.20

Conversion33.3%−6.3 pts vs expected

Actual33.3%

Expected39.6%

Attempts: 12
Goals: 4
Expected goals: 4.8
G−xG: −0.8

Shot locations

Loading canonical shot events…

Usage by situation

Ice time, share of team ice time, scoring and scoring rate, with where shifts start.

Scope	TOI/GP	Team share	G	A	P	P/60
Five-on-five	16:07	—	20	31	51	2.43
Power play	3:23	—	4	19	23	5.23
Penalty kill	0:00	—	0	0	0	0.00
Other	1:20	—	5	6	11	6.32
All situations	20:51	—	29	56	85	3.14

Where the 85 points come from · All situations

Goals29 · 1.07/60
Primary assists— · —/60
Secondary assists— · —/60

Zone starts — offensive of OZ + DZ

Offensive —Neutral —Defensive —

Shifts

— a game · — average

Zone starts: five-on-five · Shifts: all situations

Usage by situation

Loading usage…

Power play

263:42 recorded ice time · peers need 100 minutes

Share of team PP: —
PP points: 23
Unit xGF / 60: 10.28

Player	Percentile	Rank
5.23		16 / 5472nd
—	—	—
16.38		4 / 5494th
2.23		16 / 5472nd
10.28		5 / 5492nd
—	—	—

Evidence coverage: goals 46 of 73 games · team time 51 of 78 games.

Penalty kill

0:13 recorded ice time · peers need 100 minutes

Share of team PK: —
SH points: 0
Unit xGA / 60: 0.00

Player	Percentile	Rank
0.00		—
—	—	—
0.00		—
—	—	—
0.00		—

No rank yet

Evidence coverage: goals 4 of 7 games · high danger 4 of 7 games · team time 51 of 78 games.

Loading special teams…

Split	GP	G	A	P	P/GP	5v5 xG share	Team record
Venue
Home	38	12	24	36	0.95	47.7%	13–19–6
Away	40	16	32	48	1.20	56.6%	20–14–6
Rest
Back-to-back	14	2	6	8	0.57	49.0%	0–9–5
1 day of rest	42	18	31	49	1.17	52.6%	22–16–4
2+ days of rest	21	8	19	27	1.29	53.9%	11–7–3
Opponent
vs Eastern	38	19	39	58	1.53	50.9%	20–14–4
vs Western	40	9	17	26	0.65	53.8%	13–19–8
vs playoff teams	41	17	33	50	1.22	46.7%	14–20–7
vs non-playoff teams	37	11	23	34	0.92	58.7%	19–13–5
Recent
Last 10	10	2	7	9	0.90	59.8%	6–2–2

Split	G	A	P	5v5 xG share	5v5 CF%	5v5 GF–GA
Period
1st period	10	17	27	—	—	—
2nd period	9	21	30	—	—	—
3rd period	9	15	24	—	—	—
Overtime	0	3	3	—	—	—
Score state · 5v5 on ice
Leading	—	—	—	49.5%	47.5%	24–21
Tied	—	—	—	56.5%	56.2%	22–15
Trailing	—	—	—	50.1%	57.7%	23–17

Teammate	Pos	TOI together	xG share together	GF–GA	CF%	Him without	Teammate without
Mika Zibanejad	C	479:30	50.8%	18–20	54.6%	53.2%	46.8%
Alexis Lafrenière	L	454:41	51.7%	26–19	55.1%	52.7%	51.5%
Vladislav Gavrikov	D	364:36	53.8%	14–18	56.6%	51.8%	48.5%
Anze Kopitar	C	363:26	56.3%	22–11	54.5%	50.7%	48.3%
Adrian Kempe	R	361:16	57.6%	22–12	56.3%	50.2%	46.0%
Vincent Trocheck	C	311:12	48.9%	20–16	53.9%	53.4%	43.9%
Braden Schneider	D	273:49	47.7%	15–16	46.9%	53.7%	43.1%
Brandt Clarke	D	248:59	54.0%	17–13	54.3%	51.9%	53.1%
Will Borgen	D	231:31	49.8%	11–8	52.9%	52.9%	42.1%
Adam Fox	D	228:44	59.8%	13–9	63.4%	50.8%	54.9%
Joel Edmundson	D	219:32	52.9%	15–10	53.0%	52.2%	47.9%
Carson Soucy	D	213:43	46.4%	13–7	51.8%	53.4%	40.7%

	Opponent	Result		G	A		PPP	+/−	SOG		5v5 on-ice xG share	Game
Apr 26	vs COL	L 1–5	21:45	0	0	0	0	-1	1	0.04	34.5%	View →
Apr 23	vs COL	L 2–4	21:33	0	1	1	1	-3	0	0.00	33.6%	View →
Apr 21	@ COL	L 1–2 OT	23:38	1	0	1	—	0	1	0.00	23.1%	View →
Apr 19	@ COL	L 1–2	20:07	1	0	1	1	0	2	0.14	56.2%	View →
Filtered 4	—	0–4	21:46 avg	2	1	3	—	-4	4	0.18	38.1%	—

Season	GP	G	A	P	SOG	P/GP	5v5 ixG/60	5v5 GP
2025–26	4	2	1	3	4	0.75	0.18	4
2023–24	16	5	10	15	44	0.94	0.62	16
2022–23	7	0	2	2	15	0.29	0.54	7
2021–22	20	6	10	16	50	0.80	0.64	20
2019–20	3	1	1	2	10	0.67	0.67	3
2018–19	10	5	6	11	27	1.10	0.39	10
2017–18	6	2	5	7	14	1.17	0.64	6
2016–17	4	0	1	1	11	0.25	0.41	4
2015–16	7	2	5	7	23	1.00	0.78	7

	Opponent	Result		G	A		PPP	+/−	SOG		5v5 on-ice xG share	Game
Apr 16	@ CGY	L 1–3	20:26	0	0	0	0	-1	2	0.35	88.1%	View →
Apr 14	@ VAN	OTL 3–4 OT	23:01	0	1	1	—	1	1	0.40	80.0%	View →
Apr 13	@ SEA	W 5–3	16:27	0	0	0	0	-1	0	0.00	59.1%	View →
Apr 11	vs EDM	W 1–0	18:23	1	0	1	0	1	1	0.20	51.9%	View →
Apr 9	vs VAN	W 4–1	19:23	0	2	2	0	2	4	0.38	68.6%	View →
Apr 6	vs NSH	W 3–2 SO	20:52	0	0	0	0	-1	2	0.09	43.0%	View →
Apr 4	vs TOR	W 7–6 OT	22:19	1	2	3	—	1	5	0.19	65.5%	View →
Apr 2	vs NSH	OTL 4–5 SO	20:53	0	1	1	—	1	2	0.06	41.2%	View →
Apr 1	vs STL	W 2–1 OT	21:01	0	1	1	—	0	0	0.00	40.7%	View →
Mar 28	vs UTA	L 2–6	21:59	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.08	43.1%	View →
Filtered 10	—	6–2–2	20:28 avg	2	7	9	—	3	20	1.74	59.8%	—

Season	Box score · all situations	5v5 individual	5v5 on ice	Season performance
2026–27	35	LAK	5	3	1	4	-5	4	16	18.8	1	—	—	—	—	—	—	0.092	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
2025–26	34	LAK, NYR	78	28	56	84	-7	20	224	12.5	4	20:51	—	—	2.43	0.68	6.35	0.067	2.67	2.43	52.4	54.3	—	0.193	A+	46 / 403
2024–25	33	NYR	80	37	52	89	-9	16	237	15.6	8	19:41	—	—	—	—	—	0.070	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
2023–24	32	NYR	82	49	71	120	18	24	303	16.2	11	20:07	—	—	2.85	0.99	9.27	0.076	3.40	2.56	57.1	56.6	—	—	—	—
2022–23	31	NYR	82	29	63	92	4	36	204	14.2	9	19:36	—	—	2.45	0.70	5.83	0.084	3.19	2.93	52.2	52.8	—	—	—	—
2021–22	30	NYR	75	22	74	96	21	18	177	12.4	5	19:13	—	—	2.53	0.62	6.28	0.070	2.58	2.86	47.5	49.2	—	—	—	—
2020–21	29	NYR	42	17	41	58	14	6	106	16.0	5	19:39	—	—	3.04	0.58	5.60	0.068	2.51	2.39	51.2	50.1	—	—	—	—
2019–20	28	NYR	69	32	63	95	36	20	209	15.3	7	20:36	—	—	3.16	0.76	7.60	0.069	3.00	2.56	54.0	50.3	—	—	—	—
2018–19	27	CBJ	79	28	59	87	14	23	191	14.7	6	19:51	—	—	2.80	0.60	6.12	0.075	3.43	2.70	55.9	54.7	—	—	—	—
2017–18	26	CBJ	81	27	55	82	23	26	228	11.8	7	20:08	—	—	2.27	0.73	6.85	0.072	3.34	2.68	55.5	56.3	—	—	—	—
2016–17	25	CHI	82	31	43	74	18	21	211	14.7	9	19:28	—	—	2.14	0.78	6.89	0.078	2.82	2.61	51.9	54.5	—	—	—	—
2015–16	24	CHI	80	30	47	77	8	32	187	16.0	8	18:31	—	—	2.08	0.82	7.32	0.085	2.72	2.60	51.2	51.6	—	—	—	—
Career	—	12 seasons	835	333	625	958	135	246	2293	14.5	80	—	—	—	—	—	—	0.074	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—

1 award records

Calder Memorial Trophy · 2015–16

Every metric name opens its definition; the full list lives in Metrics.

Traditional statistics cover all situations. Supporting five-on-five analyses use completed games, raw adjustment and exposure from xG model v4. The two samples can differ.

An em dash means unavailable, not zero. A partial season remains partial. Where a panel reports evidence coverage, its rates use only the covered games. History never substitutes a different model, and a missing appearance interrupts a rolling model window.

Shot maps use the same shot model as Game Center and show which model version scored recent shots beside the rink. Older seasons can use earlier model versions. High danger means a model scoring probability of at least 0.20 on an unblocked attempt; for goalies, medium danger is 0.08 to 0.20 and low is below 0.08.

Special-team buckets include the wider recorded man-advantage and man-down states, read from the player’s own team; for a goalie, penalty kill means facing a power play. Their ranks need 100 recorded minutes and at least 30 qualified peers; below 100 minutes, penalty-kill percentiles are provisional. Playoff values have no ranks or percentiles. Team share is player ice time divided by team ice time in that situation, over the games the player dressed. Zone starts describe faceoff-started five-on-five shifts and exclude on-the-fly starts.

Penalties count events, including one for a double minor; bench and served-by roles are excluded, and victimless infractions have no drawn role. EPV added sums changes in the probability that the possessing team scores next; it is not standings points or an isolated player grade. Rolling windows never cross seasons or season types, and a missed game is not a zero-performance appearance. Career rates use summed counts and exposure, never an average of season rates; a missing contributing season withholds its career metric, and Performance begins in 2023–24.

Explore the full methodology →

Season			Box score · all situations												5v5 individual				5v5 on ice					Season performance
Season	Age	Team	GP	G	A	P	+/−	PIM	SOG	Sh%	PPG	TOI/GP	Hits	Blk	P/60	ixG/60	SOG/60	xG/UA	xGF/60	xGA/60	xGF%	CF%	GF%	Perf/60	Grade	Rank
2026–27	35	LAK	5	3	1	4	-5	4	16	18.8	1	—	—	—	—	—	—	0.092	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
2025–26	34	LAK, NYR	78	28	56	84	-7	20	224	12.5	4	20:51	—	—	2.43	0.68	6.35	0.067	2.67	2.43	52.4	54.3	—	0.193	A+	46 / 403
2024–25	33	NYR	80	37	52	89	-9	16	237	15.6	8	19:41	—	—	—	—	—	0.070	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
2023–24	32	NYR	82	49	71	120	18	24	303	16.2	11	20:07	—	—	2.85	0.99	9.27	0.076	3.40	2.56	57.1	56.6	—	—	—	—
2022–23	31	NYR	82	29	63	92	4	36	204	14.2	9	19:36	—	—	2.45	0.70	5.83	0.084	3.19	2.93	52.2	52.8	—	—	—	—
2021–22	30	NYR	75	22	74	96	21	18	177	12.4	5	19:13	—	—	2.53	0.62	6.28	0.070	2.58	2.86	47.5	49.2	—	—	—	—
2020–21	29	NYR	42	17	41	58	14	6	106	16.0	5	19:39	—	—	3.04	0.58	5.60	0.068	2.51	2.39	51.2	50.1	—	—	—	—
2019–20	28	NYR	69	32	63	95	36	20	209	15.3	7	20:36	—	—	3.16	0.76	7.60	0.069	3.00	2.56	54.0	50.3	—	—	—	—
2018–19	27	CBJ	79	28	59	87	14	23	191	14.7	6	19:51	—	—	2.80	0.60	6.12	0.075	3.43	2.70	55.9	54.7	—	—	—	—
2017–18	26	CBJ	81	27	55	82	23	26	228	11.8	7	20:08	—	—	2.27	0.73	6.85	0.072	3.34	2.68	55.5	56.3	—	—	—	—
2016–17	25	CHI	82	31	43	74	18	21	211	14.7	9	19:28	—	—	2.14	0.78	6.89	0.078	2.82	2.61	51.9	54.5	—	—	—	—
2015–16	24	CHI	80	30	47	77	8	32	187	16.0	8	18:31	—	—	2.08	0.82	7.32	0.085	2.72	2.60	51.2	51.6	—	—	—	—
Career	—	12 seasons	835	333	625	958	135	246	2293	14.5	80	—	—	—	—	—	—	0.074	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—

Artemi Panarin

Season performanceSelected-season standing and the components behind the scoreCollapse

Score breakdown

Scoring

Comparisons

Coverage

Method

Season metrics

Season vs reference

Season comparisons

Rolling Radar

Rolling Radar

On-ice impact5v5Average 52.4% on-ice expected goal share at five-on-five (38th of 112)What the team creates and allows during the player’s five-on-five minutesExplore

Results vs expected

On ice vs off ice

Defense5v5 · AllAverage 2.43 on-ice expected goals against per 60 (48th of 112)On-ice suppression and individual disciplineExplore

Defensive metrics

Discipline & puck management

Penaltiesnet —

Puck eventsnet —

Shooting & finishingAverage 0.68 individual expected goals per 60 (70th of 112)Where the player shoots, the quality of those chances, and actual versus expected goalsExplore

Shot map

Shooting by zone

Shot profile

Shot types

High-danger chances

Shot locations

Usage & deployment20:51 TOI per game (16:07 at five-on-five · 3:23 PP)Scoring by situation, zone starts and workloadExplore

Usage by situation

Where the 85 points come from · All situations

Zone starts — offensive of OZ + DZ

Shifts

Usage by situation

Special teamsPP · PKStrong 5.23 power-play points per 60 (16th of 54)Power play and penalty killExplore

Power play

Penalty kill

FormExplore

Rolling Radar

Splits0.95 points per game at home · 1.20 awayVenue, rest and opponentExplore

By period and score state

Linemates5v5Most often with Mika Zibanejad: 480 five-on-five minutes, 50.8% xG share togetherExplore

Playoffs4 playoff games: 2 goals, 3 points · 77 career playoff gamesExplore

2025–26 playoffs

Playoff games

Every playoff run

Game log78 games · most recent at CGY, L 1–3: 0 G, 0 AOfficial totals and five-on-five evidenceExplore

Career12 NHL seasons: 835 games, 958 pointsEvery season and a recomputed career lineExplore

Data notesScopes, missing values and model evidenceExplore

Score breakdown

Scoring

Comparisons

Coverage

Method

2025–26 playoffs

Playoff games

Every playoff run

Defensive metrics

Discipline & puck management

Penaltiesnet —

Puck eventsnet —

Power play

Penalty kill

Results vs expected

On ice vs off ice

Shot map

Shooting by zone

Shot profile

Shot types

High-danger chances

Usage by situation

Where the 85 points come from · All situations

Zone starts — offensive of OZ + DZ

Shifts

By period and score state

Season metrics

Season vs reference