Petr Mrazek

Anaheim Ducks#34Goalie Catches left

Age 34 · 6′2″ · 192 lb · Ostrava, CZE

No checked season results are available for this selection.

Games4040 startsT-32nd in NHL

Record23–14–3

Save %.91422nd in NHL

GAA2.398th in NHL

GSAx+7.6All situations…

Shutouts4T-10th in NHL

Season stopping profile

This season’s goalie profile has not been published yet. It appears once the season’s numbers have been reviewed.

How to read these comparisons

Each axis ranks the player against qualified peers. The dashed reference is the percentile of their arithmetic mean, which need not be the 50th percentile. Ties share a midrank.

Goalies need 15 covered appearances, 500 verified five-on-five shots on goal and 90% shot and appearance coverage; high danger also needs 50 high-danger shots, mid and low danger need 100 tier shots, and rebound suppression needs 600 eligible saves across 15 appearances with eligible saves. At least 30 goalies must qualify per axis. Playoff ranks are withheld. A reviewed axis whose own evidence fails is withheld and shown with its reason rather than ranked. These workload rules do not express statistical confidence.

Position uses the NHL listed primary position available now; it does not establish historical position or actual deployment. Broad groups are forwards, defence and goalies. This version uses the current model’s covered games only.

Season vs reference

Reference

All situations

Metric2018–19ReferenceDiff

.914.902+.012

per 60 minutes2.393.03-0.65

per game27.6027.69-0.09

Reference: 2017–18 · 39 games.

Season comparisons

Loading peer comparisons and model evidence…

GSAx: +13.9
Expected goals against: 73.9
Save percentage: .931
GSAx: +7.6

Saves by shot danger · five-on-five · model probability (high ≥ 0.20)

Danger	Shots	Share	Saves	Goals against	Save %	GSAx
High danger	33	4%	25	8	.758	+1.2
Medium danger	227	26%	197	30	.868	+8.4
Low danger	607	70%	585	22	.964	+4.2

Consistency · 40 starts · vs 0 qualified goalies

Quality starts23 of 40 starts at or above the league's .910 (or .885 on 20 shots or fewer)57.5%

Not in the qualified pool

Starts above expected28 starts with positive five-on-five GSAx70.0%

Not in the qualified pool

Really bad starts4 starts under .850, as a share of starts10.0%

Not in the qualified pool

Danger & rebounds · vs 0 qualified goalies

5v5 save %867 five-on-five shots on goal.931

Not in the qualified pool

High-danger save %33 five-on-five shots on goal with model probability ≥ 0.20.758

Not in the qualified pool

High-danger GSAx9.2 expected on 35 attempts, 8 allowed+1.2

Not in the qualified pool

Rebound GSAx94 rebound shots faced, 8 allowed · all situations+3.4

Not in the qualified pool

Freeze rate233 of 1,009 saves ended in a goalie stoppage · style, not graded23.1%

Context · not ranked

Loading model evidence…

Ice time and shot workload by situation.

Ice-time mix

59:40per game

5v5 Five-on-five48:06
PP Power play4:33
PK Penalty kill5:09
Other1:53

Scope	TOI/GP	SA	GA	SV%	xGA	GSAx
Five-on-five	48:06	867	60	.931	73.9	+13.9
Power play	4:33	36	5	.861	3.2	−1.8
Penalty kill	5:09	152	25	.836	19.8	−5.2
Other	1:53	49	5	.898	5.8	+0.8
All situations	59:40	1,104	95	.914	102.6	+7.6

Ice time is per game played; minutes outside the three recorded scopes appear as Other. 40 all-situations games.

Loading workload…

Every appearance · rest counts days off before the game; the playoff field is the standings' top three per division plus two wild cards

Split	GP	W–L–OTL	SA	SV%	5v5 GSAx	Goal support / GP
Venue
Home	18	12–5–1	486	.914	+5.5	3.56
Away	22	11–9–2	618	.914	+8.4	2.91
Rest
1 day of rest	9	3–5–1	259	.903	+1.2	3.00
2+ days of rest	30	20–9–1	825	.918	+12.1	3.33
Opponent
vs Eastern	24	12–11–1	676	.907	−0.9	2.83
vs Western	16	11–3–2	428	.925	+14.7	3.75
vs playoff teams	20	9–9–2	552	.917	+12.3	2.60
vs non-playoff teams	20	14–5–1	552	.911	+1.6	3.80
Recent
Last 10	10	8–2–0	308	.942	+4.9	3.30

By period and score state

Split	SA	GA	SV%	GSAx
Period
1st period	376	28	.926	+4.9
2nd period	366	34	.907	+0.4
3rd period	360	38	.894	−1.2
Overtime	7	0	1.000	+1.2
Score state · his team
Leading	416	33	.921	+5.4
Tied	451	38	.916	+2.2
Trailing	242	29	.880	−2.3

From play-by-play; shootouts excluded. Shots on goal he faced; GSAx is expected goals on attempts faced minus goals.

Loading splits…

	Opponent	Result		SA	GA	SV	Save %	5v5 xGA	5v5 GSAx	Game
May 12	@ BOS	L 2–6	60:00	25	6	19	.760	1.84	−2.2	View →
May 9	@ BOS	L 2–5	59:35	27	4	23	.852	2.45	+0.4	View →
Apr 28	@ NYI	W 2–1	26:27	10	1	9	.900	0.71	+0.7	View →
Apr 26	@ NYI	W 1–0 OT	64:04	31	0	31	1.000	2.08	+2.1	View →
Apr 24	@ WSH	W 4–3 OT	91:05	37	3	34	.919	2.63	−0.4	View →
Apr 22	vs WSH	W 5–2	59:57	25	2	23	.920	1.21	−0.8	View →
Apr 20	@ WSH	L 0–6	58:48	28	6	22	.786	1.45	−0.6	View →
Apr 18	vs WSH	W 2–1	60:00	31	1	30	.968	2.06	+2.1	View →
Apr 15	vs WSH	W 5–0	59:57	18	0	18	1.000	1.00	+1.0	View →
Apr 13	@ WSH	L 3–4 OT	61:41	33	4	29	.879	1.93	−2.1	View →
10 games	—	6–4	60:09 avg	265	27	238	.898	17.4	+0.4	—

Season	GP	GS	W–L	SA	SV%	GAA	SO	5v5 GSAx/100	5v5 GP
2020–21	2	2	1–1	63	.873	3.90	0	+4.72	2
2019–20	5	5	2–3	155	.929	2.08	0	+2.67	5
2018–19	11	11	5–5	282	.894	2.73	2	+0.13	11
2017–18	1	0	0–0	14	.857	3.87	0	−4.46	1
2015–16	3	3	1–2	73	.945	1.35	1	+6.56	3

	Opponent	Result	Decision		SA	GA	SV	Save %	5v5 xGA	5v5 GSAx	Game
Apr 4	vs NJD	W 3–1	W	60:00	37	1	36	.973	1.93	+0.9	View →
Apr 2	@ TOR	W 4–1	W	59:39	24	1	23	.958	1.95	+1.9	View →
Mar 30	vs PHI	W 5–2	W	59:57	32	2	30	.938	2.11	+1.1	View →
Mar 26	@ WSH	L 1–4	L	58:58	27	3	24	.889	1.92	−1.1	View →
Mar 23	vs MIN	W 5–1	W	60:00	25	1	24	.960	1.54	+1.5	View →
Mar 19	vs PIT	W 3–2 SO	W	64:23	38	2	36	.947	2.16	+0.2	View →
Mar 15	@ CBJ	L 0–3	L	59:20	19	2	17	.895	1.07	−0.9	View →
Mar 11	@ COL	W 3–0	W	60:00	38	0	38	1.000	2.19	+2.2	View →
Mar 9	@ NSH	W 5–3	W	59:58	34	3	31	.912	2.38	+0.4	View →
Mar 2	@ FLA	W 4–3 OT	W	61:46	34	3	31	.912	1.67	−1.3	View →
10 games	—	8–2–0	8–2–0	60:24 avg	308	18	290	.942	18.9	+4.9	—

Season	GP	GS	W–L–OTL	SA	SV%	GAA	SO	5v5 GSAx/100	5v5 GP
2025–26	10	8	3–5–0	247	.858	4.07	0	−3.02	10
2024–25	38	38	12–21–2	1,066	.891	3.35	1	−0.75	38
2023–24	56	53	18–31–4	1,724	.908	3.05	1	—	56
2022–23	39	38	10–22–3	1,248	.894	3.66	0	+0.16	39
2021–22	20	18	12–6–0	520	.888	3.34	0	−2.57	20
2020–21	12	12	6–2–3	298	.923	2.06	3	+4.61	12
2019–20	40	38	21–16–2	1,091	.905	2.69	3	—	40
2018–19	40	40	23–14–3	1,104	.914	2.39	4	+1.60	41
2017–18	39	33	14–13–6	1,080	.902	3.03	4	+0.39	39
2016–17	50	44	18–21–9	1,462	.901	3.04	1	—	50
2015–16	54	49	27–16–6	1,448	.921	2.33	4	—	54

Every metric name opens its definition; the full list lives in Metrics.

Traditional statistics cover all situations. Supporting five-on-five analyses use completed games, raw adjustment and exposure from xG model v4. The two samples can differ.

An em dash means unavailable, not zero. A partial season remains partial. Where a panel reports evidence coverage, its rates use only the covered games. History never substitutes a different model, and a missing appearance interrupts a rolling model window.

Shot maps use the same shot model as Game Center and show which model version scored recent shots beside the rink. Older seasons can use earlier model versions. High danger means a model scoring probability of at least 0.20 on an unblocked attempt; for goalies, medium danger is 0.08 to 0.20 and low is below 0.08.

Special-team buckets include the wider recorded man-advantage and man-down states, read from the player’s own team; for a goalie, penalty kill means facing a power play. Their ranks need 100 recorded minutes and at least 30 qualified peers; below 100 minutes, penalty-kill percentiles are provisional. Playoff values have no ranks or percentiles. Team share is player ice time divided by team ice time in that situation, over the games the player dressed. Zone starts describe faceoff-started five-on-five shifts and exclude on-the-fly starts.

Penalties count events, including one for a double minor; bench and served-by roles are excluded, and victimless infractions have no drawn role. EPV added sums changes in the probability that the possessing team scores next; it is not standings points or an isolated player grade. Rolling windows never cross seasons or season types, and a missed game is not a zero-performance appearance. Career rates use summed counts and exposure, never an average of season rates; a missing contributing season withholds its career metric, and Performance begins in 2023–24.

EPV attribution: -0.01 across 19 attributed games. This is summed change in the probability that the possessing team scores next—not standings points.

Explore the full methodology →

Zone	Att	GA	xGA	Save rate	Exp.	Prevented
High slot	410	30	37.7	92.7%	90.8%	+7.7
Outer slot	94	3	7.3	96.8%	92.2%	+4.3
Right circle	112	1	2.7	99.1%	97.6%	+1.7
Left circle	102	2	2.9	98.0%	97.2%	+0.9
Point	486	9	9.6	98.1%	98.0%	+0.6
Below goal line	22	1	0.6	95.5%	97.2%	−0.4
Inner slot	327	49	41.8	85.0%	87.2%	−7.2
All zones	1,553	95	102.6	93.9%	93.4%	+7.6

Type	Share	SV%	Prevented
Wrist	38.4%	.903	−0.7
Snap	25.9%	.928	+4.9
Slap	15.5%	.940	+0.4
Backhand	7.9%	.942	+3.8
Tip-in	6.4%	.908	+1.7
Deflected	4.7%	.791	−2.8
Other	1.2%	—	+0.2

Petr Mrazek

Goalie profileStopping, rebounds, style and workload against qualified goaliesCollapse

Season stopping profile

Season vs reference

Season comparisons

StoppingGoals saved against expectation, and where the shots came fromGoals saved against expectation, and where the shots came fromExplore

Saves by shot danger · five-on-five · model probability (high ≥ 0.20)

Consistency · 40 starts · vs 0 qualified goalies

Danger & rebounds · vs 0 qualified goalies

Shots867 five-on-five shots faced (230 high-danger · 196 medium · 441 low)Where shots faced come from and how difficult they wereExplore

Shot locations

Workload59:40 TOI per game (48:06 at five-on-five · 4:33 PP · 5:09 PK)Ice time and shots faced by game situationExplore

Ice-time mix

Special teamsPP · PK.836 on the penalty kill (152 shots, −5.2 GSAx)Workload and results on the penalty kill and power playExplore

Penalty kill

Power play

FormHot .942 over the last 10 games vs .914 this season (290 saves on 308 shots)Recent stopping against his own seasonExplore

SplitsSave % .914 at home · .914 awayVenue, rest and opponentExplore

By period and score state

Team in front2.30 expected goals against per 60 at five-on-five in front of him · 3.22 goals of support per 60What reached him, and the goals scored for himExplore

Defense in front

Goal support

Playoffs11 playoff games: 5-5, .894 save percentage · 22 career playoff gamesExplore

2018–19 playoffs

Playoff games

Every playoff run

Game log40 GP · Last start: W 3–1 vs NJD (36 saves on 37 shots)Official totals and five-on-five evidenceExplore

Career11 NHL seasons: 398 games, .904 save percentageEvery season and a recomputed career lineExplore

Development through the seasons

Season ledger

Data notesScopes, missing values and model evidenceExplore

2018–19 playoffs

Playoff games

Every playoff run

Ice-time mix

Shot map

Stopping by zone

Shot context

Shot types

High-danger chances

Penalty kill

Power play

Development through the seasons

Season ledger

Season stopping profile

Season vs reference

Rolling Radar

Rolling Radar

Saves by shot danger · five-on-five · model probability (high ≥ 0.20)

Consistency · 40 starts · vs 0 qualified goalies

Danger & rebounds · vs 0 qualified goalies

By period and score state

Defense in front

Goal support