Ryan Kesler

Team not recorded#17Center Shoots right

Age 42 · 6′2″ · 206 lb · Livonia, Michigan, USA

No checked season results are available for this selection.

Games79T-163rd in NHL

Goals210.27/GPT-73rd in NHL

Assists320.41/GPT-73rd in NHL

Points530.67/GPT-69th in NHL

5v5 xG share54.3%37th of 194…

Avg TOI19:32136th in NHL…

Career awards

No checked season results are available for this selection.

No complete checked component breakdown is available for this selection.

Loading season standing and profile…

Season metrics

2015–16 · five-on-five · vs 194 positional peers

Player	Percentile	Rank
1.39		100 / 19449th
0.56		92 / 19453rd
—	—	—

Shooting & finishing	Player	Percentile	Rank
	0.80		37 / 19481st
	6.17		109 / 19444th
	13.02		44 / 19478th
	0.080		45 / 15772nd
	-0.25		122 / 15722nd

Elite90+Strong70–89Average30–69Weak10–29Poor<10Bar length is the peer percentile, so longer is always better · tick at the 50th

How to read these comparisons

Player values are recorded season results. Peer averages are arithmetic means of qualified players in the selected group; each row uses the same peers for its average and rank. Ranks use unrounded values, with tied players sharing a rank and the next rank skipped. Lower xG against ranks better. Bar colours are the five performance tiers; context rows are blue and not graded. Differences from the average describe the season, not isolated player impact.

Goals above expected is the raw goals-minus-xG rate, without the shrinkage used in the older finishing comparison. On-ice measures include teammates, opponents and deployment. These recorded metrics describe different quantities from the adjusted Season score components beside them.

Skaters need 20 appearances and 300 five-on-five minutes; quality and finishing also need 75 unblocked attempts. Early in a season these minimums scale down with games played so far. At least 30 peers must qualify. Playoff ranks are withheld. A reviewed axis whose own evidence fails is withheld and shown with its reason rather than ranked. These workload rules do not express statistical confidence.

Position uses the NHL listed primary position available now; it does not establish historical position or actual deployment. Broad groups are forwards, defence and goalies. This version uses the current model’s covered games only.

Season vs reference

Reference

Per game · all situations

Metric2015–16ReferenceDiff

0.27——

0.41——

0.67——

2.08——

First covered season: no earlier personal reference is available.

Season comparisons

Loading peer comparisons and model evidence…

Optional recent-history profile

Rolling Radar

Recent NHL history, carried across seasons. The radar compares this broader profile with a fixed position-group reference.

Rolling profile is currently unavailable.

Rolling Radar

Loading recent-history profile…

Results vs expected

Five-on-five · what happened beside the chances created and allowed

Chances	Player	Percentile	Rank
	2.62		47 / 19476th
	2.21		69 / 19465th
	54.3		37 / 19481st

Player	Percentile	Rank
—	—	—
—	—	—
—	—	—

Player	Percentile	Rank
—	—	—
—	—	—
—	—	—

Context · not graded

5v5 goals: —
5v5 expected: 47.1–39.7
EPV added: +2.98

On ice vs off ice

Anaheim's share with Ryan Kesler on the ice against the same team without him.

Share	On ice and off ice	On-minus-off gap in percentage points
xGF%	On ice 54.3% · Off ice unavailable	—
CF%	On ice 52.9% · Off ice unavailable	—
GF%	On ice unavailable · Off ice unavailable	—

On iceOff ice

Scale 40–65% · marker at 50% · right column is the on-minus-off gap in points

Loading model evidence…

Defensive metrics

Five-on-five on-ice suppression; individual events in all situations.

Player	Percentile	Rank
51.56		66 / 19466th
—	—	—
0.060		112 / 19442nd

Player	Percentile	Rank
—	—	—
—	—	—
—	—	—

Physical style	Player	Percentile	Rank
	—	—	—
	—	—	—

Context · not graded

Evidence coverage: high danger 21 of 79 games.

Discipline & puck management

Recorded season event counts · all situations

Penaltiesnet —

Taken —Drawn —

Puck eventsnet —

Giveaways —Takeaways —

Blocks: —
Hits: —

Both penalty counts cover 25 of 79 games with every drawn role recorded.

Loading defensive evidence…

SituationChancesViewShot type

Shot map

All 268 attempts

Goal21Shot on goal144Missed shot103Blocked shot0Larger dot = higher xG

Shooting by zone

Hover a row to light it up · click to pin

Zone	Att	G	xG	Goal rate	Exp.	G−xG
Point	39	2	1.6	5.1%	4.2%	+0.4
Below goal line	1	0	0.1	0.0%	5.6%	−0.1
Left circle	13	0	0.3	0.0%	2.5%	−0.3
Right circle	27	0	0.6	0.0%	2.1%	−0.6
Inner slot	75	10	10.9	13.3%	14.5%	−0.9
Outer slot	15	1	2.0	6.7%	13.4%	−1.0
High slot	98	8	9.2	8.2%	9.4%	−1.2
All zones	268	21	24.7	7.8%	9.2%	−3.7

Finishing evidence. Scoring 7.8% on chances vs 9.2% expected (−1.4 points), with the largest shortfall in the high slot.

Sorted by goals minus expected goals. Goal rate is goals per unblocked attempt against the expected rate.

Shot profile

Context · not graded

On-net rate: 61.6%
Slot share: 64.6%
Average distance: 27.4 ft
Rebound attempts / 60: 0.66

Shot types

268 attempts

Type	Share	Sh%	G−xG
Wrist	50.4%	15.7%	+0.4
Slap	13.8%	20.0%	+1.1
Snap	11.9%	9.1%	−0.8
Tip-in	11.9%	5.0%	−1.9
Backhand	10.4%	6.3%	−2.2
Wrap-around	1.1%	0.0%	−0.2
Other	0.4%	—	−0.1

Share is context, not a grade. Sh% counts shots on goal only.

High-danger chances

Model goal probability ≥ 0.20

Conversion22.2%−14.8 pts vs expected

Actual22.2%

Expected37.0%

Attempts: 18
Goals: 4
Expected goals: 6.7
G−xG: −2.7

Shot locations

Loading canonical shot events…

Usage by situation

Ice time, share of team ice time, scoring and scoring rate, with where shifts start.

Scope	TOI/GP	Team share	G	A	P	P/60
Five-on-five	13:39	—	10	15	25	1.39
Power play	2:02	—	5	10	15	5.62
Penalty kill	2:45	—	1	0	1	0.28
Other	1:06	—	5	7	12	8.33
All situations	19:32	—	21	32	53	2.06

Where the 53 points come from · All situations

Goals21 · 0.82/60
Primary assists— · —/60
Secondary assists— · —/60

Zone starts — offensive of OZ + DZ

Offensive —Neutral —Defensive —

Shifts

— a game · — average

Zone starts: five-on-five · Shifts: all situations

Faceoffs

All situations · zones are read from his side of the draw · values only; no peer ranks yet

Win %: 58.5%
Draws per game: 21.20
Offensive zone: 57.4%
Defensive zone: 58.1%
Power play: 64.5%

Usage by situation

Loading usage…

Power play

160:02 recorded ice time · peers need 100 minutes

Share of team PP: —
PP points: 15
Unit xGF / 60: 8.21

Player	Percentile	Rank
5.62		14 / 10187th
—	—	—
11.62		33 / 10168th
1.82		19 / 10182nd
8.21		7 / 10194th
—	—	—

Evidence coverage: goals 11 of 75 games · team time 25 of 79 games.

Penalty kill

217:51 recorded ice time · peers need 100 minutes

Share of team PK: —
SH points: 1
Unit xGA / 60: 6.35

Player	Percentile	Rank
6.35		35 / 7151st
—	—	—
110.72		58 / 7119th
—	—	—
0.90		23 / 7169th

Evidence coverage: goals 14 of 79 games · high danger 15 of 79 games · team time 25 of 79 games.

Loading special teams…

Split	GP	G	A	P	P/GP	5v5 xG share	Team record
Venue
Home	41	12	16	28	0.68	55.3%	25–10–6
Away	38	9	16	25	0.66	52.8%	19–15–4
Rest
Back-to-back	10	2	6	8	0.80	44.0%	5–3–2
1 day of rest	47	12	16	28	0.60	55.1%	23–16–8
2+ days of rest	21	7	10	17	0.81	55.1%	16–5–0
Opponent
vs Eastern	29	6	8	14	0.48	58.1%	15–11–3
vs Western	50	15	24	39	0.78	52.1%	29–14–7
vs playoff teams	39	8	10	18	0.46	51.0%	19–16–4
vs non-playoff teams	40	13	22	35	0.88	57.2%	25–9–6
Recent
Last 10	10	6	7	13	1.30	55.0%	6–3–1

Split	G	A	P	5v5 xG share	5v5 CF%	5v5 GF–GA
Period
1st period	6	6	12	—	—	—
2nd period	7	11	18	—	—	—
3rd period	8	14	22	—	—	—
Overtime	0	1	1	—	—	—
Score state · 5v5 on ice
Leading	—	—	—	52.8%	47.4%	13–10
Tied	—	—	—	54.1%	52.4%	17–15
Trailing	—	—	—	54.3%	59.7%	7–8

Teammate	Pos	TOI together	xG share together	GF–GA	CF%	Him without	Teammate without
Jakob Silfverberg	R	799:13	57.8%	31–21	55.7%	42.9%	46.8%
Andrew Cogliano	C	456:51	57.3%	25–14	52.8%	50.5%	52.9%
Hampus Lindholm	D	406:21	60.4%	9–12	57.1%	50.0%	56.2%
Josh Manson	D	358:33	58.9%	10–10	55.5%	51.2%	57.0%
Cam Fowler	D	335:10	47.3%	18–13	46.2%	56.6%	49.8%
Kevin Bieksa	D	332:18	52.1%	12–13	49.1%	54.3%	51.6%
Sami Vatanen	D	314:47	53.6%	10–9	52.7%	53.7%	50.6%
Carl Hagelin	L	240:59	57.1%	7–12	56.3%	52.5%	51.2%
Simon Despres	D	160:27	50.5%	7–3	50.4%	54.2%	56.1%
Clayton Stoner	D	137:05	50.7%	3–4	53.0%	54.0%	51.5%
Nick Ritchie	L	130:32	51.4%	3–4	56.4%	53.9%	55.4%
Corey Perry	R	109:16	42.8%	4–5	39.8%	54.9%	54.7%

	Opponent	Result		G		PPP	+/−	SOG		5v5 on-ice xG share	Game
Apr 27	vs NSH	L 1–2	21:45	1	1	1	0	3	0.03	51.6%	View →
Apr 25	@ NSH	L 1–3	19:37	1	1	1	0	1	0.06	38.8%	View →
Apr 23	vs NSH	W 5–2	20:18	1	1	—	1	4	0.18	42.6%	View →
Apr 21	@ NSH	W 4–1	19:42	0	0	—	0	1	0.00	28.2%	View →
Apr 19	@ NSH	W 3–0	19:52	0	0	—	1	2	0.05	75.4%	View →
Apr 17	vs NSH	L 2–3	18:39	0	0	0	0	3	0.13	46.0%	View →
Apr 15	vs NSH	L 2–3	21:02	1	1	—	0	1	0.07	32.4%	View →
Filtered 7	—	3–4	20:08 avg	4	4	—	2	15	0.52	42.3%	—

Season	GP	G	A	P	SOG	P/GP	5v5 ixG/60	5v5 GP
2017–18	4	0	2	2	6	0.50	0.81	4
2016–17	17	1	7	8	45	0.47	0.78	17
2015–16	7	4	0	4	15	0.57	0.33	7

	Opponent	Result		G	A		PPP	+/−	SOG		5v5 on-ice xG share	Game
Apr 9	@ COL	W 5–3	19:05	0	2	2	—	2	1	0.00	55.2%	View →
Apr 7	@ LAK	L 1–2	22:11	1	0	1	—	-1	5	0.22	24.2%	View →
Apr 5	vs WPG	OTL 1–2 OT	24:15	0	0	0	—	-1	1	0.04	22.5%	View →
Apr 3	vs DAL	W 3–1	18:53	2	0	2	0	1	3	0.42	63.9%	View →
Apr 1	vs VAN	L 2–3	20:09	0	0	0	—	0	2	0.50	66.9%	View →
Mar 30	vs CGY	W 8–3	16:19	1	3	4	—	3	2	0.06	80.3%	View →
Mar 28	@ EDM	W 2–1	20:10	0	0	0	0	-1	1	0.00	72.6%	View →
Mar 22	@ MTL	L 3–4	19:14	0	1	1	—	1	0	0.00	50.7%	View →
Mar 20	@ WPG	W 3–2 OT	19:53	1	1	2	—	2	1	0.12	58.6%	View →
Mar 18	vs BOS	W 4–0	17:07	1	0	1	—	1	1	0.15	54.1%	View →
Filtered 10	—	6–3–1	19:44 avg	6	7	13	—	7	17	1.50	55.0%	—

Season	Box score · all situations	5v5 individual	5v5 on ice	Season performance
2018–19	34	ANA	60	5	3	8	-19	44	86	5.8	1	16:30	—	—	0.42	0.55	5.71	0.069	2.32	3.02	43.5	45.0	—	—	—	—
2017–18	33	ANA	44	8	6	14	-4	46	78	10.3	2	18:02	—	—	1.03	0.69	5.97	0.078	2.42	2.68	47.4	48.2	—	—	—	—
2016–17	32	ANA	82	22	36	58	8	83	186	11.8	8	21:18	—	—	1.67	0.74	6.38	0.079	2.76	2.40	53.5	51.3	—	—	—	—
2015–16	31	ANA	79	21	32	53	5	78	164	12.8	5	19:32	—	—	1.39	0.80	6.17	0.080	2.62	2.21	54.3	52.9	—	—	—	—
Career	—	4 seasons	265	56	77	133	-10	251	514	10.9	16	19:09	—	—	1.23	0.71	6.11	0.077	2.57	2.51	50.6	49.9	—	—	—	—

1 award records

Frank J. Selke Trophy · 2010–11

Every metric name opens its definition; the full list lives in Metrics.

Traditional statistics cover all situations. Supporting five-on-five analyses use completed games, raw adjustment and exposure from xG model v4. The two samples can differ.

An em dash means unavailable, not zero. A partial season remains partial. Where a panel reports evidence coverage, its rates use only the covered games. History never substitutes a different model, and a missing appearance interrupts a rolling model window.

Shot maps use the same shot model as Game Center and show which model version scored recent shots beside the rink. Older seasons can use earlier model versions. High danger means a model scoring probability of at least 0.20 on an unblocked attempt; for goalies, medium danger is 0.08 to 0.20 and low is below 0.08.

Special-team buckets include the wider recorded man-advantage and man-down states, read from the player’s own team; for a goalie, penalty kill means facing a power play. Their ranks need 100 recorded minutes and at least 30 qualified peers; below 100 minutes, penalty-kill percentiles are provisional. Playoff values have no ranks or percentiles. Team share is player ice time divided by team ice time in that situation, over the games the player dressed. Zone starts describe faceoff-started five-on-five shifts and exclude on-the-fly starts.

Penalties count events, including one for a double minor; bench and served-by roles are excluded, and victimless infractions have no drawn role. EPV added sums changes in the probability that the possessing team scores next; it is not standings points or an isolated player grade. Rolling windows never cross seasons or season types, and a missed game is not a zero-performance appearance. Career rates use summed counts and exposure, never an average of season rates; a missing contributing season withholds its career metric, and Performance begins in 2023–24.

Explore the full methodology →

Season			Box score · all situations												5v5 individual				5v5 on ice					Season performance
Season	Age	Team	GP	G	A	P	+/−	PIM	SOG	Sh%	PPG	TOI/GP	Hits	Blk	P/60	ixG/60	SOG/60	xG/UA	xGF/60	xGA/60	xGF%	CF%	GF%	Perf/60	Grade	Rank
2018–19	34	ANA	60	5	3	8	-19	44	86	5.8	1	16:30	—	—	0.42	0.55	5.71	0.069	2.32	3.02	43.5	45.0	—	—	—	—
2017–18	33	ANA	44	8	6	14	-4	46	78	10.3	2	18:02	—	—	1.03	0.69	5.97	0.078	2.42	2.68	47.4	48.2	—	—	—	—
2016–17	32	ANA	82	22	36	58	8	83	186	11.8	8	21:18	—	—	1.67	0.74	6.38	0.079	2.76	2.40	53.5	51.3	—	—	—	—
2015–16	31	ANA	79	21	32	53	5	78	164	12.8	5	19:32	—	—	1.39	0.80	6.17	0.080	2.62	2.21	54.3	52.9	—	—	—	—
Career	—	4 seasons	265	56	77	133	-10	251	514	10.9	16	19:09	—	—	1.23	0.71	6.11	0.077	2.57	2.51	50.6	49.9	—	—	—	—

Ryan Kesler

Season performanceSelected-season standing and the components behind the scoreCollapse

Season metrics

Season vs reference

Season comparisons

Rolling Radar

Rolling Radar

On-ice impact5v5Strong 54.3% on-ice expected goal share at five-on-five (37th of 194)What the team creates and allows during the player’s five-on-five minutesExplore

Results vs expected

On ice vs off ice

Defense5v5 · AllAverage 2.21 on-ice expected goals against per 60 (69th of 194)On-ice suppression and individual disciplineExplore

Defensive metrics

Discipline & puck management

Penaltiesnet —

Puck eventsnet —

Shooting & finishingStrong 0.80 individual expected goals per 60 (37th of 194)Where the player shoots, the quality of those chances, and actual versus expected goalsExplore

Shot map

Shooting by zone

Shot profile

Shot types

High-danger chances

Shot locations

Usage & deployment19:32 TOI per game (13:39 at five-on-five · 2:02 PP · 2:45 PK)Scoring by situation, zone starts and workloadExplore

Usage by situation

Where the 53 points come from · All situations

Zone starts — offensive of OZ + DZ

Shifts

Faceoffs

Usage by situation

Special teamsPP · PKStrong 5.62 power-play points per 60 (14th of 101)Power play and penalty killExplore

Power play

Penalty kill

FormExplore

Rolling Radar

Splits0.68 points per game at home · 0.66 awayVenue, rest and opponentExplore

By period and score state

Linemates5v5Most often with Jakob Silfverberg: 799 five-on-five minutes, 57.8% xG share togetherWho he plays with at five-on-fiveExplore

Playoffs7 playoff games: 4 goals, 4 points · 28 career playoff gamesExplore

2015–16 playoffs

Playoff games

Every playoff run

Game log79 games · most recent at COL, W 5–3: 0 G, 2 AOfficial totals and five-on-five evidenceExplore

Career4 NHL seasons: 265 games, 133 pointsEvery season and a recomputed career lineExplore

Data notesScopes, missing values and model evidenceExplore

2015–16 playoffs

Playoff games

Every playoff run

Defensive metrics

Discipline & puck management

Penaltiesnet —

Puck eventsnet —

Power play

Penalty kill

Results vs expected

On ice vs off ice

Shot map

Shooting by zone

Shot profile

Shot types

High-danger chances

Usage by situation

Where the 53 points come from · All situations

Zone starts — offensive of OZ + DZ

Shifts

Faceoffs

By period and score state

Season metrics

Season vs reference