Shea Weber

Chicago Blackhawks#6Defenseman Shoots right

Age 41 · 6′4″ · 230 lb · Sicamous, BC, CAN

No checked season results are available for this selection.

Games48T-321st in NHL

Goals60.13/GP▼0.11T-296th in NHL

Assists130.27/GP▼0.05T-235th in NHL

Points190.40/GP▼0.16T-274th in NHL…

5v5 xG share51.2%81st of 205…

Avg TOI22:42T-38th in NHL…

No checked season results are available for this selection.

No complete checked component breakdown is available for this selection.

Loading season standing and profile…

Season metrics

2020–21 · five-on-five · vs 205 positional peers

Player	Percentile	Rank
0.61		151 / 20526th
0.15		105 / 20549th
—	—	—

Shooting & finishing	Player	Percentile	Rank
	0.13		159 / 20523rd
	5.38		51 / 20575th
	11.53		36 / 20583rd
	0.017		112 / 1131st
	0.02		51 / 11355th

Elite90+Strong70–89Average30–69Weak10–29Poor<10Bar length is the peer percentile, so longer is always better · tick at the 50th

How to read these comparisons

Player values are recorded season results. Peer averages are arithmetic means of qualified players in the selected group; each row uses the same peers for its average and rank. Ranks use unrounded values, with tied players sharing a rank and the next rank skipped. Lower xG against ranks better. Bar colours are the five performance tiers; context rows are blue and not graded. Differences from the average describe the season, not isolated player impact.

Goals above expected is the raw goals-minus-xG rate, without the shrinkage used in the older finishing comparison. On-ice measures include teammates, opponents and deployment. These recorded metrics describe different quantities from the adjusted Season score components beside them.

Skaters need 20 appearances and 300 five-on-five minutes; quality and finishing also need 75 unblocked attempts. Early in a season these minimums scale down with games played so far. At least 30 peers must qualify. Playoff ranks are withheld. A reviewed axis whose own evidence fails is withheld and shown with its reason rather than ranked. These workload rules do not express statistical confidence.

Position uses the NHL listed primary position available now; it does not establish historical position or actual deployment. Broad groups are forwards, defence and goalies. This version uses the current model’s covered games only.

Season vs reference

Reference

Per game · all situations

Metric2020–21ReferenceDiff

0.130.23-0.11

0.270.32-0.05

0.400.55-0.16

2.172.85-0.68

Reference: 2019–20 · 65 games.

Season comparisons

Loading peer comparisons and model evidence…

Optional recent-history profile

Rolling Radar

Recent NHL history, carried across seasons. The radar compares this broader profile with a fixed position-group reference.

Rolling profile is currently unavailable.

Rolling Radar

Loading recent-history profile…

Results vs expected

Five-on-five · what happened beside the chances created and allowed

Chances	Player	Percentile	Rank
	2.19		151 / 20526th
	2.09		41 / 20580th
	51.2		81 / 20561st

Player	Percentile	Rank
—	—	—
—	—	—
—	—	—

Player	Percentile	Rank
—	—	—
—	—	—
—	—	—

Context · not graded

5v5 goals: —
5v5 expected: 28.9–27.6
EPV added: +0.20

On ice vs off ice

Montreal's share with Shea Weber on the ice against the same team without him.

Share	On ice and off ice	On-minus-off gap in percentage points
xGF%	On ice 51.2% · Off ice unavailable	—
CF%	On ice 53.4% · Off ice unavailable	—
GF%	On ice unavailable · Off ice unavailable	—

On iceOff ice

Scale 40–65% · marker at 50% · right column is the on-minus-off gap in points

Loading model evidence…

Defensive metrics

Five-on-five on-ice suppression; individual events in all situations.

Player	Percentile	Rank
52.10		104 / 20550th
—	—	—
0.053		11 / 20595th

Player	Percentile	Rank
—	—	—
—	—	—
—	—	—

Physical style	Player	Percentile	Rank
	—	—	—
	—	—	—

Context · not graded

Evidence coverage: high danger 17 of 48 games.

Discipline & puck management

Recorded season event counts · all situations

Penaltiesnet —

Taken —Drawn —

Puck eventsnet —

Giveaways —Takeaways —

Blocks: —
Hits: —

Both penalty counts cover 19 of 48 games with every drawn role recorded.

Loading defensive evidence…

SituationChancesViewShot type

Shot map

All 146 attempts

Goal6Shot on goal98Missed shot42Blocked shot0Larger dot = higher xG

Shooting by zone

Hover a row to light it up · click to pin

Zone	Att	G	xG	Goal rate	Exp.	G−xG
Point	124	4	2.4	3.2%	2.0%	+1.6
Right circle	6	1	0.1	16.7%	1.9%	+0.9
Inner slot	3	1	0.3	33.3%	10.9%	+0.7
Below goal line	1	0	0.0	0.0%	1.1%	0.0
Left circle	4	0	0.1	0.0%	2.4%	−0.1
High slot	8	0	0.5	0.0%	6.0%	−0.5
All zones	146	6	3.5	4.1%	2.4%	+2.5

Finishing evidence. Scoring 4.1% on chances vs 2.4% expected (+1.7 points), led by point volume and slap finishing.

Sorted by goals minus expected goals. Goal rate is goals per unblocked attempt against the expected rate.

Shot profile

Context · not graded

On-net rate: 71.2%
Slot share: 7.5%
Average distance: 53.7 ft
Rebound attempts / 60: 0.22

Shot types

146 attempts

Type	Share	Sh%	G−xG
Slap	52.1%	7.8%	+2.0
Wrist	35.6%	4.9%	+0.9
Snap	11.0%	0.0%	−0.3
Backhand	1.4%	0.0%	0.0

Share is context, not a grade. Sh% counts shots on goal only.

Shot locations

Loading canonical shot events…

Usage by situation

Ice time, share of team ice time, scoring and scoring rate, with where shifts start.

Scope	TOI/GP	Team share	G	A	P	P/60	Rank (D)
Five-on-five	16:29	—	2	6	8	0.61	151 / 205
Power play	2:21	—	4	7	11	5.85	9 / 48
Penalty kill	2:54	—	0	0	0	0.00	31 / 73
Other	0:58	—	0	0	0	0.00	120 / 205
All situations	22:42	—	6	13	19	1.05	79 / 205

Where the 19 points come from · All situations

Goals6 · 0.33/60
Primary assists— · —/60
Secondary assists— · —/60

Zone starts — offensive of OZ + DZ

Offensive —Neutral —Defensive —

Shifts

— a game · — average

Zone starts: five-on-five · Shifts: all situations

Usage by situation

Loading usage…

Power play

112:51 recorded ice time · peers need 100 minutes

Share of team PP: —
PP points: 11
Unit xGF / 60: 5.47

Player	Percentile	Rank
5.85		9 / 4883rd
—	—	—
13.82		6 / 4889th
0.82		17 / 4866th
5.47		37 / 4823rd
—	—	—

Evidence coverage: goals 11 of 46 games · team time 18 of 48 games.

Penalty kill

139:25 recorded ice time · peers need 100 minutes

Share of team PK: —
SH points: 0
Unit xGA / 60: 7.17

Player	Percentile	Rank
7.17		57 / 7322nd
—	—	—
95.54		33 / 7356th
—	—	—
0.85		41 / 7344th

Evidence coverage: goals 10 of 48 games · high danger 10 of 48 games · team time 18 of 48 games.

Loading special teams…

Split	GP	G	A	P	P/GP	5v5 xG share	Team record
Venue
Home	23	1	9	10	0.43	53.8%	10–11–2
Away	25	5	4	9	0.36	48.9%	11–7–7
Rest
Back-to-back	9	0	4	4	0.44	48.8%	3–5–1
1 day of rest	32	5	6	11	0.34	47.4%	14–11–7
2+ days of rest	6	1	2	3	0.50	74.2%	4–2–0
Recent
Last 10	10	1	1	2	0.20	40.8%	4–6–0

Split	G	A	P	5v5 xG share	5v5 CF%	5v5 GF–GA
Period
1st period	3	5	8	—	—	—
2nd period	3	7	10	—	—	—
3rd period	0	1	1	—	—	—
Overtime	0	0	0	—	—	—
Score state · 5v5 on ice
Leading	—	—	—	56.3%	49.9%	11–13
Tied	—	—	—	49.6%	52.7%	11–7
Trailing	—	—	—	47.0%	57.0%	9–11

Teammate	Pos	TOI together	xG share together	GF–GA	CF%	Him without	Teammate without
Ben Chiarot	D	482:11	51.2%	15–19	51.7%	51.1%	50.6%
Phillip Danault	C	293:55	54.5%	15–8	55.2%	49.1%	59.2%
Tomas Tatar	L	229:59	57.5%	11–7	57.0%	48.5%	56.7%
Josh Anderson	R	211:33	48.0%	6–9	52.6%	52.1%	52.4%
Nick Suzuki	C	211:03	54.3%	6–6	51.2%	50.3%	55.3%
Tyler Toffoli	C	210:11	52.5%	7–7	54.9%	50.6%	58.3%
Brendan Gallagher	R	202:56	58.9%	10–7	56.2%	48.1%	66.2%
Jonathan Drouin	L	185:16	47.7%	8–8	54.8%	52.2%	53.3%
Joel Edmundson	D	179:03	47.9%	9–8	51.2%	52.1%	55.4%
Jesperi Kotkaniemi	C	178:32	44.2%	6–10	53.2%	53.3%	54.4%
Paul Byron	L	142:13	45.8%	7–8	49.4%	52.3%	49.5%
Artturi Lehkonen	L	127:16	48.2%	5–6	48.9%	51.7%	54.3%

	Opponent	Result		G	A		PPP	+/−	SOG		5v5 on-ice xG share	Game
Jul 5	vs TBL	W 3–2 OT	23:51	0	0	0	—	1	0	0.02	72.4%	View →
Jul 2	vs TBL	L 3–6	22:11	0	1	1	0	1	5	0.14	36.6%	View →
Jun 30	@ TBL	L 1–3	23:28	0	0	0	—	-1	2	0.01	50.6%	View →
Jun 28	@ TBL	L 1–5	25:20	0	1	1	—	1	5	0.22	45.2%	View →
Jun 24	vs VGK	W 3–2 OT	26:53	1	0	1	—	0	2	0.00	35.4%	View →
Jun 22	@ VGK	W 4–1	23:43	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.06	59.7%	View →
Jun 20	vs VGK	L 1–2 OT	23:35	0	0	0	—	0	0	0.05	54.2%	View →
Jun 18	vs VGK	W 3–2 OT	31:17	0	0	0	—	2	0	0.07	32.4%	View →
Jun 16	@ VGK	W 3–2	24:42	0	0	0	—	-1	2	0.02	53.4%	View →
Jun 14	@ VGK	L 1–4	25:28	0	0	0	0	-1	0	0.00	68.5%	View →
Filtered 10	—	5–5	25:03 avg	1	2	3	—	2	19	0.61	48.5%	—

Season	GP	G	A	P	SOG	P/GP	5v5 ixG/60	5v5 GP
2020–21	21	1	5	6	47	0.29	0.12	21
2019–20	10	3	2	5	27	0.50	0.20	10
2016–17	6	1	2	3	15	0.50	0.11	6
2015–16	14	3	4	7	28	0.50	0.12	14

	Opponent	Result		G	A		PPP	+/−	SOG		5v5 on-ice xG share	Game
Apr 28	vs TOR	L 1–4	21:48	0	0	0	—	-1	4	0.02	33.3%	View →
Apr 26	@ CGY	W 2–1	23:10	1	0	1	1	0	2	0.00	28.3%	View →
Apr 24	@ CGY	L 2–5	23:43	0	0	0	0	-1	2	0.02	58.2%	View →
Apr 23	@ CGY	L 2–4	22:29	0	0	0	0	-2	3	0.03	20.5%	View →
Apr 21	@ EDM	W 4–3	23:42	0	0	0	—	-1	1	0.02	70.9%	View →
Apr 19	@ EDM	L 1–4	23:16	0	0	0	0	-1	2	0.01	45.4%	View →
Apr 17	vs OTT	L 0–4	21:41	0	0	0	0	-2	1	0.02	38.0%	View →
Apr 16	vs CGY	W 2–1	21:24	0	0	0	—	-1	3	0.03	31.4%	View →
Apr 14	vs CGY	L 1–4	21:44	0	0	0	0	0	4	0.05	46.2%	View →
Apr 12	vs TOR	W 4–2	21:13	0	1	1	1	1	1	0.01	62.2%	View →
Filtered 10	—	4–6–0	22:25 avg	1	1	2	—	-8	23	0.22	40.8%	—

Season	Box score · all situations	5v5 individual	5v5 on ice	Season performance
2020–21	35	MTL	48	6	13	19	-4	33	104	5.8	4	22:42	—	—	0.61	0.13	5.38	0.017	2.19	2.09	51.2	53.4	—	—	—	—
2019–20	34	MTL	65	15	21	36	8	33	185	8.1	3	24:00	—	—	1.10	0.24	6.91	0.023	2.71	2.42	52.8	54.3	—	—	—	—
2018–19	33	MTL	58	14	19	33	15	28	166	8.4	5	23:29	—	—	1.50	0.21	7.09	0.020	2.81	2.39	54.0	53.8	—	—	—	—
2017–18	32	MTL	26	6	10	16	-8	14	75	8.0	2	25:21	—	—	1.30	0.20	5.97	0.022	3.03	2.46	55.2	54.1	—	—	—	—
2016–17	31	MTL	78	17	25	42	20	38	183	9.3	12	25:04	—	—	0.69	0.12	4.84	0.016	2.18	2.08	51.2	51.4	—	—	—	—
2015–16	30	NSH	78	20	31	51	-7	27	189	10.6	14	25:23	—	—	0.85	0.18	4.82	0.024	2.50	2.05	54.9	51.5	—	—	—	—
Career	—	6 seasons	353	78	119	197	24	173	902	8.6	40	24:23	—	—	0.97	0.18	5.74	0.021	2.52	2.22	53.2	52.8	—	—	—	—

1 award records

Mark Messier NHL Leadership Award · 2015–16

Every metric name opens its definition; the full list lives in Metrics.

Traditional statistics cover all situations. Supporting five-on-five analyses use completed games, raw adjustment and exposure from xG model v4. The two samples can differ.

An em dash means unavailable, not zero. A partial season remains partial. Where a panel reports evidence coverage, its rates use only the covered games. History never substitutes a different model, and a missing appearance interrupts a rolling model window.

Shot maps use the same shot model as Game Center and show which model version scored recent shots beside the rink. Older seasons can use earlier model versions. High danger means a model scoring probability of at least 0.20 on an unblocked attempt; for goalies, medium danger is 0.08 to 0.20 and low is below 0.08.

Special-team buckets include the wider recorded man-advantage and man-down states, read from the player’s own team; for a goalie, penalty kill means facing a power play. Their ranks need 100 recorded minutes and at least 30 qualified peers; below 100 minutes, penalty-kill percentiles are provisional. Playoff values have no ranks or percentiles. Team share is player ice time divided by team ice time in that situation, over the games the player dressed. Zone starts describe faceoff-started five-on-five shifts and exclude on-the-fly starts.

Penalties count events, including one for a double minor; bench and served-by roles are excluded, and victimless infractions have no drawn role. EPV added sums changes in the probability that the possessing team scores next; it is not standings points or an isolated player grade. Rolling windows never cross seasons or season types, and a missed game is not a zero-performance appearance. Career rates use summed counts and exposure, never an average of season rates; a missing contributing season withholds its career metric, and Performance begins in 2023–24.

Explore the full methodology →

Season			Box score · all situations												5v5 individual				5v5 on ice					Season performance
Season	Age	Team	GP	G	A	P	+/−	PIM	SOG	Sh%	PPG	TOI/GP	Hits	Blk	P/60	ixG/60	SOG/60	xG/UA	xGF/60	xGA/60	xGF%	CF%	GF%	Perf/60	Grade	Rank
2020–21	35	MTL	48	6	13	19	-4	33	104	5.8	4	22:42	—	—	0.61	0.13	5.38	0.017	2.19	2.09	51.2	53.4	—	—	—	—
2019–20	34	MTL	65	15	21	36	8	33	185	8.1	3	24:00	—	—	1.10	0.24	6.91	0.023	2.71	2.42	52.8	54.3	—	—	—	—
2018–19	33	MTL	58	14	19	33	15	28	166	8.4	5	23:29	—	—	1.50	0.21	7.09	0.020	2.81	2.39	54.0	53.8	—	—	—	—
2017–18	32	MTL	26	6	10	16	-8	14	75	8.0	2	25:21	—	—	1.30	0.20	5.97	0.022	3.03	2.46	55.2	54.1	—	—	—	—
2016–17	31	MTL	78	17	25	42	20	38	183	9.3	12	25:04	—	—	0.69	0.12	4.84	0.016	2.18	2.08	51.2	51.4	—	—	—	—
2015–16	30	NSH	78	20	31	51	-7	27	189	10.6	14	25:23	—	—	0.85	0.18	4.82	0.024	2.50	2.05	54.9	51.5	—	—	—	—
Career	—	6 seasons	353	78	119	197	24	173	902	8.6	40	24:23	—	—	0.97	0.18	5.74	0.021	2.52	2.22	53.2	52.8	—	—	—	—

Shea Weber

Season performanceSelected-season standing and the components behind the scoreCollapse

Season metrics

Season vs reference

Season comparisons

Rolling Radar

Rolling Radar

On-ice impact5v5Average 51.2% on-ice expected goal share at five-on-five (81st of 205)What the team creates and allows during the player’s five-on-five minutesExplore

Results vs expected

On ice vs off ice

Defense5v5 · AllStrong 2.09 on-ice expected goals against per 60 (41st of 205)On-ice suppression and individual disciplineExplore

Defensive metrics

Discipline & puck management

Penaltiesnet —

Puck eventsnet —

Shooting & finishingWeak 0.13 individual expected goals per 60 (159th of 205)Where the player shoots, the quality of those chances, and actual versus expected goalsExplore

Shot map

Shooting by zone

Shot profile

Shot types

Shot locations

Usage & deployment22:42 TOI per game (16:29 at five-on-five · 2:21 PP · 2:54 PK)Scoring by situation, zone starts and workloadExplore

Usage by situation

Where the 19 points come from · All situations

Zone starts — offensive of OZ + DZ

Shifts

Usage by situation

Special teamsPP · PKStrong 5.85 power-play points per 60 (9th of 48)Power play and penalty killExplore

Power play

Penalty kill

FormExplore

Rolling Radar

Splits0.43 points per game at home · 0.36 awayVenue, rest and opponentExplore

By period and score state

Linemates5v5Most often with Ben Chiarot: 482 five-on-five minutes, 51.2% xG share togetherWho he plays with at five-on-fiveExplore

Playoffs21 playoff games: 1 goal, 6 points · 51 career playoff gamesExplore

2020–21 playoffs

Playoff games

Every playoff run

Game log48 games · most recent vs TOR, L 1–4: 0 G, 0 AOfficial totals and five-on-five evidenceExplore

Career6 NHL seasons: 353 games, 197 pointsEvery season and a recomputed career lineExplore

Data notesScopes, missing values and model evidenceExplore

2020–21 playoffs

Playoff games

Every playoff run

Defensive metrics

Discipline & puck management

Penaltiesnet —

Puck eventsnet —

Power play

Penalty kill

Results vs expected

On ice vs off ice

Shot map

Shooting by zone

Shot profile

Shot types

Usage by situation

Where the 19 points come from · All situations

Zone starts — offensive of OZ + DZ

Shifts

By period and score state

Season metrics

Season vs reference