Jannik Hansen — 2016–17 stats and season rank | IceSheet
Jannik Hansen
Team not recorded·#36·Right wing · Shoots right
Age 40 · 6′1″ · 198 lb · Rodovre, DNK
Loading season standing…
Games43…
Goals80.19/GP▼0.14…
Assists120.28/GP▲0.04…
Points200.47/GP▼0.10…
5v5 xG share…
Avg TOI16:03…
/
Loading season standing and profile…
Season comparisons
Loading peer comparisons and model evidence…
Optional recent-history profile
Rolling Radar
Loading recent-history profile…
Loading model evidence…
Loading defensive evidence…
Shot locations
Loading canonical shot events…
Usage by situation
Loading usage…
Loading special teams…
No checked season results are available for this selection.
No checked season results are available for this selection.
No complete checked component breakdown is available for this selection.
Average 0.72 individual expected goals per 60 (48th of 105)
Average 0.72 individual expected goals per 60 (48th of 105)
53.3%35th of 105
Average 53.3% on-ice expected goal share at five-on-five (35th of 105)
Average 53.3% on-ice expected goal share at five-on-five (35th of 105)
Average 2.36 on-ice expected goals against per 60 (51st of 105)
Average 2.36 on-ice expected goals against per 60 (51st of 105)
Defensive metrics
Five-on-five on-ice suppression; individual events in all situations.
Suppression
Player
Percentile
Rank
56.20
71 / 10533rd
—
—
—
0.061
67 / 10537th
Puck management
Player
Percentile
Rank
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Physical style
Player
Percentile
Rank
—
—
—
—
—
—
Context · not graded
Player value: 56.20 Peer range: 45.54 – 65.05 / 60
MeanJannik Hansen
Lower (better)Higher
Player 56.20 · mean 54.50. Lower raw values are better.
On-ice attempts against per 60, including blocks.
Discipline & puck management
Recorded season event counts · all situations
Penaltiesnet —
Taken —Drawn —
Puck eventsnet —
Giveaways —Takeaways —
Blocks
—
all situations
Hits
—
all situations
0.00 power-play points per 60
0.00 power-play points per 60
Power play
8:30 recorded ice time · peers need 100 minutes
Share of team PP
—
in games dressed
PP points
0
goals + assists
Unit xGF / 60
4.89
team without: —
Power play rates
Player
Percentile
Rank
0.00
—
—
—
—
7.06
—
2.18
—
4.89
—
—
—
—
No rank yet
Player value: 0.00 Peer range: 0.00 – 8.11 / 60
MeanJannik Hansen
Lower Higher (better)
Player 0.00 · mean 4.07. Higher raw values rank higher. Needs 100 minutes in this special-teams scope.
Recorded goals plus assists per 60 in this scope; widened power-play and penalty-kill scopes.
Needs 100 minutes in this special-teams scope.
Penalty kill
63:02 recorded ice time · peers need 100 minutes
Share of team PK
—
in games dressed
SH points
0
goals + assists
Unit xGA / 60
6.01
team without: —
Penalty kill rates
Player
Percentile
Rank
6.01
—
—
—
—
91.38
—
—
—
—
0.63
—
No rank yet
Player value: 6.01 Peer range: 4.83 – 9.22 / 60
MeanJannik Hansen
Lower (better)Higher
Player 6.01 · mean 6.70. Lower raw values are better. Fewer than 30 qualified peers.
Raw on-ice expected goals against per 60; the Season metrics sample.
Fewer than 30 qualified peers.
16:03 TOI per game (13:53 at five-on-five · 0:12 PP · 1:28 PK)
16:03 TOI per game (13:53 at five-on-five · 0:12 PP · 1:28 PK)
T-554th in NHL
T-294th in NHL
T-348th in NHL
T-339th in NHL
T-370th in NHL
Jannik Hansen
105 attempts8.69 xG8 G
Goal8Shot on goal65Missed shot32Blocked shot0Larger dot = higher xG
Shooting by zone
Zone
Att
G
xG
Goal rate / exp.
G−xG
Point
24
1
0.5
4.2% / 2.0%
+0.5
Inner slot
29
4
4.0
13.8% / 13.7%
0.0
Left circle
4
0
0.1
0.0% / 2.9%
−0.1
Right circle
7
0
0.2
0.0% / 2.4%
−0.2
High slot
33
3
3.3
9.1% / 10.1%
−0.3
Outer slot
8
0
0.6
0.0% / 7.9%
−0.6
All zones
105
8
8.7
7.6% / 8.3%
−0.7
Sorted by goals minus expected goals. Goal rate is goals per unblocked attempt against the expected rate. Hover a row to light up those attempts on the rink.
Finishing evidence. Scoring 7.6% on chances vs 8.3% expected (−0.7 points), with the largest shortfall in the outer slot.
Shot types105 attempts
Type
Share
Sh%
G−xG
Wrist
58.1%
12.8%
+0.3
Slap
21.0%
0.0%
−0.9
Snap
8.6%
16.7%
+0.3
Deflected
5.7%
0.0%
−0.6
Backhand
4.8%
25.0%
+0.4
Tip-in
1.0%
—
−0.2
Other
1.0%
—
−0.1
Share is context, not a grade. Sh% counts shots on goal only.
High-danger chancesmodel probability ≥ 0.20
Attempts5.7% of the selected attempts
6
Goals
1
Expected goals
1.8
Conversion
16.7%29.5% expected
Shot profilecontext · not graded
On-net rate73 of 105 attempts on goal
69.5%
Slot share62 of 105 from the inner or high slot
59.0%
Average distancefrom the centre of the net
29.7 ft
Rebound attempts / 606 this season · all situations
0.52
Usage by situation
Ice time, share of team ice time, scoring and scoring rate, with where shifts start.
Scope
TOI/GP
Team share
G
A
P
P/60
Five-on-five
13:53
—
7
12
19
1.91
Power play
0:12
—
0
0
0
0.00
Penalty kill
1:28
—
0
0
0
0.00
Other
0:31
—
1
0
1
2.74
All situations
16:03
—
8
12
20
1.74
Where the 20 points come from · All situations
Goals8 · 0.70/60
Primary assists— · —/60
Secondary assists— · —/60
Zone starts — offensive of OZ + DZ
Offensive —Neutral —Defensive —
Shifts
— a game · — average
Zone starts: five-on-five · Shifts: all situations
Season metrics
2016–17 · five-on-five · vs 105 positional peers
Production
Player
Percentile
Rank
1.91
20 / 10582nd
0.70
40 / 10563rd
—
—
—
Shooting & finishing
Player
Percentile
Rank
0.72
48 / 10555th
6.53
72 / 10532nd
11.96
61 / 10542nd
0.076
35 / 9263rd
-0.01
40 / 9257th
Elite90+Strong70–89Average30–69Weak10–29Poor<10Bar length is the peer percentile, so longer is always better · tick at the 50th
Player value: 1.91 Peer range: 0.45 – 2.47 / 60
MeanJannik Hansen
Lower Higher (better)
Player 1.91 · mean 1.48. Higher raw values rank higher.
Recorded five-on-five goals plus assists per 60 minutes.
How to read these comparisons
Player values are recorded season results. Peer averages are arithmetic means of qualified players in the selected group; each row uses the same peers for its average and rank. Ranks use unrounded values, with tied players sharing a rank and the next rank skipped. Lower xG against ranks better. Bar colours are the five performance tiers; context rows are blue and not graded. Differences from the average describe the season, not isolated player impact.
Goals above expected is the raw goals-minus-xG rate, without the shrinkage used in the older finishing comparison. On-ice measures include teammates, opponents and deployment. These recorded metrics describe different quantities from the adjusted Season score components beside them.
Skaters need 20 appearances and 300 five-on-five minutes; quality and finishing also need 75 unblocked attempts. Early in a season these minimums scale down with games played so far. At least 30 peers must qualify. Playoff ranks are withheld. A reviewed axis whose own evidence fails is withheld and shown with its reason rather than ranked. These workload rules do not express statistical confidence.
Position uses the NHL listed primary position available now; it does not establish historical position or actual deployment. Broad groups are forwards, defence and goalies. This version uses the current model’s covered games only.
Season vs reference
Per game · all situations
Metric2016–17ReferenceDiff
0.190.33-0.14
0.280.24+0.04
0.470.57-0.10
1.701.75-0.05
Reference: 2015–16 · 67 games.
Recent scoring against his own season
Recent scoring against his own season
Loading recent games…
Loading splits…
Loading linemates…
Loading playoff games…
Loading game log…
Loading career ledger…
Every metric name opens its definition; the full list lives in Metrics.
Traditional statistics cover all situations. Supporting five-on-five analyses use completed games, raw adjustment and exposure from xG model v4. The two samples can differ.
An em dash means unavailable, not zero. A partial season remains partial. Where a panel reports evidence coverage, its rates use only the covered games. History never substitutes a different model, and a missing appearance interrupts a rolling model window.
Shot maps use the same shot model as Game Center and show which model version scored recent shots beside the rink. Older seasons can use earlier model versions. High danger means a model scoring probability of at least 0.20 on an unblocked attempt; for goalies, medium danger is 0.08 to 0.20 and low is below 0.08.
Special-team buckets include the wider recorded man-advantage and man-down states, read from the player’s own team; for a goalie, penalty kill means facing a power play. Their ranks need 100 recorded minutes and at least 30 qualified peers; below 100 minutes, penalty-kill percentiles are provisional. Playoff values have no ranks or percentiles. Team share is player ice time divided by team ice time in that situation, over the games the player dressed. Zone starts describe faceoff-started five-on-five shifts and exclude on-the-fly starts.
Penalties count events, including one for a double minor; bench and served-by roles are excluded, and victimless infractions have no drawn role. EPV added sums changes in the probability that the possessing team scores next; it is not standings points or an isolated player grade. Rolling windows never cross seasons or season types, and a missed game is not a zero-performance appearance. Career rates use summed counts and exposure, never an average of season rates; a missing contributing season withholds its career metric, and Performance begins in 2023–24.
Hot 6 points in the last 10 games (0.60 per game vs 0.47 this season)
Hot 6 points in the last 10 games (0.60 per game vs 0.47 this season)
0.48 points per game at home · 0.44 away
0.48 points per game at home · 0.44 away
Most often with Ben Hutton: 134 five-on-five minutes, 56.7% xG share together
Most often with Ben Hutton: 134 five-on-five minutes, 56.7% xG share together
Five-on-five · time together from shift charts (590:09 of his 5v5 ice time) · xG share together and apart
Teammate
Pos
TOI together
xG share together
GF–GA
CF%
Him without
Teammate without
Ben Hutton
D
133:35
56.7%
2–5
56.1%
49.8%
44.4%
Luca Sbisa
D
133:32
51.2%
8–7
48.8%
51.5%
41.8%
Henrik Sedin
C
131:44
43.3%
4–4
46.8%
53.8%
45.0%
Daniel Sedin
L
128:07
45.5%
4–4
46.9%
53.2%
43.8%
Brandon Sutter
C
126:51
49.4%
4–4
47.1%
52.1%
43.3%
Markus Granlund
C
111:11
48.0%
3–3
47.6%
52.2%
47.0%
Chris Tanev
D
107:12
57.8%
4–2
47.8%
50.1%
40.6%
Alexander Edler
D
104:24
46.2%
4–4
39.5%
52.8%
46.2%
Bo Horvat
C
103:05
53.3%
6–5
48.2%
51.1%
45.2%
Alexandre Burrows
R
93:40
42.5%
6–6
47.3%
53.2%
47.3%
Joe Pavelski
C
89:01
50.0%
2–6
46.2%
51.7%
51.4%
Mikkel Boedker
L
84:10
65.8%
4–3
58.5%
48.8%
49.8%
Without columns are five-on-five xG share apart: him on the ice without that teammate, and the teammate without him (with this club). Bars are centred on an even 50%.
2016–17 playoffs
Official playoff totals · no peer ranks, since playoff samples are too small for a fair comparison
Games
6
15:41 per game
Goals
0
0 on the power play
Assists
1
official
Points
1
0 power-play points
Plus-minus
0
even strength and shorthanded
Shots
10
0.0% shooting
Playoff games
Official totals; expected-goal columns are five-on-five.
