Paul Stastny

Team not recorded#26Center Shoots left

Age 40 · 6′0″ · 193 lb · Quebec City, QC, CAN

No checked season results are available for this selection.

Games73T-310th in NHL

Goals90.12/GP▼0.17T-323rd in NHL

Assists130.18/GP▼0.16T-395th in NHL

Points220.30/GP▼0.33T-381st in NHL…

5v5 xG share58.5%11th of 213…

Avg TOI11:52714th in NHL…

No checked season results are available for this selection.

No complete checked component breakdown is available for this selection.

Loading season standing and profile…

Season metrics

2022–23 · five-on-five · vs 213 positional peers

Player	Percentile	Rank
1.46		126 / 21341st
0.57		122 / 21343rd
—	—	—

Shooting & finishing	Player	Percentile	Rank
	0.77		96 / 21355th
	5.62		161 / 21325th
	9.36		170 / 21320th
	0.095		36 / 18281st
	-0.20		119 / 18235th

Elite90+Strong70–89Average30–69Weak10–29Poor<10Bar length is the peer percentile, so longer is always better · tick at the 50th

How to read these comparisons

Player values are recorded season results. Peer averages are arithmetic means of qualified players in the selected group; each row uses the same peers for its average and rank. Ranks use unrounded values, with tied players sharing a rank and the next rank skipped. Lower xG against ranks better. Bar colours are the five performance tiers; context rows are blue and not graded. Differences from the average describe the season, not isolated player impact.

Goals above expected is the raw goals-minus-xG rate, without the shrinkage used in the older finishing comparison. On-ice measures include teammates, opponents and deployment. These recorded metrics describe different quantities from the adjusted Season score components beside them.

Skaters need 20 appearances and 300 five-on-five minutes; quality and finishing also need 75 unblocked attempts. Early in a season these minimums scale down with games played so far. At least 30 peers must qualify. Playoff ranks are withheld. A reviewed axis whose own evidence fails is withheld and shown with its reason rather than ranked. These workload rules do not express statistical confidence.

Position uses the NHL listed primary position available now; it does not establish historical position or actual deployment. Broad groups are forwards, defence and goalies. This version uses the current model’s covered games only.

Season vs reference

Reference

Per game · all situations

Metric2022–23ReferenceDiff

0.120.30-0.17

0.180.34-0.16

0.300.63-0.33

1.101.99-0.89

Reference: 2021–22 · 71 games.

Season comparisons

Loading peer comparisons and model evidence…

Optional recent-history profile

Rolling Radar

Recent NHL history, carried across seasons. The radar compares this broader profile with a fixed position-group reference.

Rolling profile is currently unavailable.

Rolling Radar

Loading recent-history profile…

Results vs expected

Five-on-five · what happened beside the chances created and allowed

Chances	Player	Percentile	Rank
	3.28		31 / 21386th
	2.33		17 / 21392nd
	58.5		11 / 21395th

Player	Percentile	Rank
—	—	—
—	—	—
—	—	—

Player	Percentile	Rank
—	—	—
—	—	—
—	—	—

Context · not graded

5v5 goals: —
5v5 expected: 40.3–28.7
EPV added: +2.84

On ice vs off ice

Carolina's share with Paul Stastny on the ice against the same team without him.

Share	On ice and off ice	On-minus-off gap in percentage points
xGF%	On ice 58.5% · Off ice unavailable	—
CF%	On ice 61.2% · Off ice unavailable	—
GF%	On ice unavailable · Off ice unavailable	—

On iceOff ice

Scale 40–65% · marker at 50% · right column is the on-minus-off gap in points

Loading model evidence…

Defensive metrics

Five-on-five on-ice suppression; individual events in all situations.

Player	Percentile	Rank
46.14		7 / 21397th
—	—	—
0.065		66 / 21369th

Player	Percentile	Rank
—	—	—
—	—	—
—	—	—

Physical style	Player	Percentile	Rank
	—	—	—
	—	—	—

Context · not graded

Evidence coverage: high danger 26 of 73 games.

Discipline & puck management

Recorded season event counts · all situations

Penaltiesnet —

Taken —Drawn —

Puck eventsnet —

Giveaways —Takeaways —

Blocks: —
Hits: —

Both penalty counts cover 27 of 73 games with every drawn role recorded.

Loading defensive evidence…

SituationChancesViewShot type

Shot map

All 120 attempts

Goal9Shot on goal71Missed shot40Blocked shot0Larger dot = higher xG

Shooting by zone

Hover a row to light it up · click to pin

Zone	Att	G	xG	Goal rate	Exp.	G−xG
Outer slot	12	1	0.9	8.3%	7.5%	+0.1
Left circle	4	0	0.1	0.0%	2.0%	−0.1
Point	9	0	0.1	0.0%	1.2%	−0.1
Below goal line	3	0	0.1	0.0%	3.8%	−0.1
Right circle	3	0	0.2	0.0%	5.7%	−0.2
Inner slot	58	6	7.1	10.3%	12.2%	−1.1
High slot	31	2	3.2	6.5%	10.3%	−1.2
All zones	120	9	11.6	7.5%	9.7%	−2.6

Finishing evidence. Scoring 7.5% on chances vs 9.7% expected (−2.2 points), with the largest shortfall in the high slot.

Sorted by goals minus expected goals. Goal rate is goals per unblocked attempt against the expected rate.

Shot profile

Context · not graded

On-net rate: 66.7%
Slot share: 74.2%
Average distance: 19.6 ft
Rebound attempts / 60: 1.45

Shot types

120 attempts

Type	Share	Sh%	G−xG
Wrist	54.2%	9.3%	−2.0
Tip-in	21.7%	8.3%	−0.9
Backhand	8.3%	14.3%	+0.2
Deflected	6.7%	100.0%	+1.1
Snap	5.8%	0.0%	−0.7
Slap	1.7%	0.0%	−0.2
Other	1.7%	—	−0.1

Share is context, not a grade. Sh% counts shots on goal only.

High-danger chances

Model goal probability ≥ 0.20

Conversion12.5%−14.1 pts vs expected

Actual12.5%

Expected26.6%

Attempts: 8
Goals: 1
Expected goals: 2.1
G−xG: −1.1

Shot locations

Loading canonical shot events…

Usage by situation

Ice time, share of team ice time, scoring and scoring rate, with where shifts start.

Scope	TOI/GP	Team share	G	A	P	P/60
Five-on-five	10:06	—	7	11	18	1.46
Power play	1:35	—	2	2	4	2.08
Penalty kill	0:03	—	0	0	0	0.00
Other	0:09	—	0	0	0	0.00
All situations	11:52	—	9	13	22	1.52

Where the 22 points come from · All situations

Goals9 · 0.62/60
Primary assists— · —/60
Secondary assists— · —/60

Zone starts — offensive of OZ + DZ

Offensive —Neutral —Defensive —

Shifts

— a game · — average

Zone starts: five-on-five · Shifts: all situations

Faceoffs

All situations · zones are read from his side of the draw · values only; no peer ranks yet

Win %: 57.6%
Draws per game: 6.66
Offensive zone: 62.8%
Defensive zone: 55.5%
Power play: 60.0%

Usage by situation

Loading usage…

Power play

115:08 recorded ice time · peers need 100 minutes

Share of team PP: —
PP points: 4
Unit xGF / 60: 7.13

Player	Percentile	Rank
2.08		100 / 1077th
—	—	—
5.73		103 / 1074th
1.13		95 / 10711th
7.13		77 / 10728th
—	—	—

Evidence coverage: goals 9 of 56 games · team time 27 of 73 games.

Penalty kill

3:44 recorded ice time · peers need 100 minutes

Share of team PK: —
SH points: 0
Unit xGA / 60: 3.70

Player	Percentile	Rank
3.70		—
—	—	—
48.21		—
—	—	—
1.42		—

No rank yet

Evidence coverage: goals 2 of 16 games · high danger 2 of 16 games · team time 27 of 73 games.

Loading special teams…

Split	GP	G	A	P	P/GP	5v5 xG share	Team record
Venue
Home	38	5	5	10	0.26	61.2%	26–9–3
Away	35	4	8	12	0.34	55.1%	22–7–6
Rest
Back-to-back	10	1	2	3	0.30	60.6%	7–2–1
1 day of rest	39	6	7	13	0.33	60.0%	26–8–5
2+ days of rest	23	2	3	5	0.22	55.6%	14–6–3
Opponent
vs Eastern	43	5	9	14	0.33	56.8%	31–9–3
vs Western	30	4	4	8	0.27	61.0%	17–7–6
vs playoff teams	34	3	3	6	0.18	56.6%	18–11–5
vs non-playoff teams	39	6	10	16	0.41	59.8%	30–5–4
Recent
Last 10	10	1	1	2	0.20	64.8%	5–4–1

Teammate	Pos	TOI together	xG share together	GF–GA	CF%	Him without	Teammate without
Derek Stepan	C	313:48	59.4%	19–12	64.9%	59.7%	62.9%
Martin Necas	C	267:27	61.2%	10–9	59.0%	58.5%	52.7%
Andrei Svechnikov	R	253:33	61.1%	9–9	59.4%	58.6%	59.0%
Jalen Chatfield	D	244:55	65.0%	17–11	62.4%	56.6%	55.9%
Stefan Noesen	R	241:00	57.0%	15–10	60.6%	60.9%	58.9%
Brent Burns	D	235:48	58.1%	7–7	60.2%	60.4%	59.6%
Jaccob Slavin	D	226:17	59.3%	6–6	59.7%	59.8%	59.4%
Brett Pesce	D	221:59	55.2%	9–6	59.8%	61.3%	53.8%
Brady Skjei	D	208:27	52.6%	10–6	58.9%	62.1%	55.2%
Calvin de Haan	D	176:08	62.8%	10–7	63.6%	58.6%	55.6%
Jack Drury	C	114:25	64.4%	7–6	65.9%	58.7%	57.4%
Shayne Gostisbehere	D	62:46	68.8%	4–3	65.5%	58.9%	60.9%

	Opponent	Result		G		PPP	+/−	SOG		5v5 on-ice xG share	Game
May 24	@ FLA	L 3–4	14:31	1	1	0	1	1	0.09	32.7%	View →
May 22	@ FLA	L 0–1	13:42	0	0	—	0	0	0.00	87.3%	View →
May 20	vs FLA	L 1–2 OT	10:43	0	0	—	0	5	0.50	85.3%	View →
May 18	vs FLA	L 2–3 OT	24:11	0	0	—	0	0	0.00	29.9%	View →
May 11	vs NJD	W 3–2 OT	14:54	0	0	—	0	1	0.01	55.4%	View →
May 9	@ NJD	W 6–1	13:05	0	0	—	0	0	0.09	41.3%	View →
May 7	@ NJD	L 4–8	11:42	0	0	—	0	1	0.31	74.2%	View →
May 5	vs NJD	W 6–1	13:44	0	0	—	-1	1	0.13	44.0%	View →
May 3	vs NJD	W 5–1	13:59	0	0	0	-1	0	0.00	48.7%	View →
Apr 28	@ NYI	W 2–1 OT	9:28	1	1	—	0	2	0.05	50.4%	View →
Filtered 10	—	5–5	14:00 avg	2	2	—	-1	11	1.18	49.8%	—

	Opponent	Result		G	A		PPP	+/−	SOG		5v5 on-ice xG share	Game
Apr 13	@ FLA	W 6–4	7:24	0	0	0	0	1	0	0.08	89.0%	View →
Apr 11	vs DET	W 4–1	9:14	0	0	0	0	1	0	0.00	27.8%	View →
Apr 8	@ BUF	L 3–4	6:30	0	0	0	—	-1	1	0.05	48.6%	View →
Apr 4	vs OTT	W 3–2 OT	7:41	0	0	0	—	-1	1	0.02	23.3%	View →
Apr 2	vs NYI	W 2–1	11:27	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.14	90.4%	View →
Apr 1	@ MTL	W 3–0	12:01	1	1	2	—	2	4	0.26	67.6%	View →
Mar 30	@ DET	L 2–3	10:25	0	0	0	—	0	0	0.00	91.7%	View →
Mar 28	vs TBL	L 0–4	8:48	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.00	51.4%	View →
Mar 26	vs BOS	OTL 3–4 SO	10:19	0	0	0	—	0	1	0.01	65.4%	View →
Mar 12	@ NJD	L 0–3	11:32	0	0	0	—	0	2	0.13	55.1%	View →
Filtered 10	—	5–4–1	9:32 avg	1	1	2	—	2	10	0.69	64.8%	—

Teammate	Pos	TOI together	xG share together	GF–GA	CF%	Him without	Teammate without
Derek Stepan	C	313:48	59.4%	19–12	64.9%	59.7%	62.9%
Martin Necas	C	267:27	61.2%	10–9	59.0%	58.5%	52.7%
Andrei Svechnikov	R	253:33	61.1%	9–9	59.4%	58.6%	59.0%
Jalen Chatfield	D	244:55	65.0%	17–11	62.4%	56.6%	55.9%
Stefan Noesen	R	241:00	57.0%	15–10	60.6%	60.9%	58.9%
Brent Burns	D	235:48	58.1%	7–7	60.2%	60.4%	59.6%
Jaccob Slavin	D	226:17	59.3%	6–6	59.7%	59.8%	59.4%
Brett Pesce	D	221:59	55.2%	9–6	59.8%	61.3%	53.8%
Brady Skjei	D	208:27	52.6%	10–6	58.9%	62.1%	55.2%
Calvin de Haan	D	176:08	62.8%	10–7	63.6%	58.6%	55.6%
Jack Drury	C	114:25	64.4%	7–6	65.9%	58.7%	57.4%
Shayne Gostisbehere	D	62:46	68.8%	4–3	65.5%	58.9%	60.9%

Split	G	A	P	5v5 xG share	5v5 CF%	5v5 GF–GA
Period
1st period	3	8	11	—	—	—
2nd period	5	3	8	—	—	—
3rd period	1	2	3	—	—	—
Overtime	0	0	0	—	—	—
Score state · 5v5 on ice
Leading	—	—	—	56.5%	56.8%	13–13
Tied	—	—	—	63.9%	63.4%	16–7
Trailing	—	—	—	58.8%	67.7%	5–5

Season	GP	G	A	P	SOG	P/GP	5v5 ixG/60	5v5 GP
2022–23	15	4	0	4	13	0.27	0.58	15
2020–21	6	1	1	2	9	0.33	0.40	6
2019–20	18	3	6	9	45	0.50	1.23	18
2018–19	7	2	6	8	15	1.14	0.69	7
2017–18	17	6	9	15	23	0.88	0.79	17
2016–17	7	2	1	3	14	0.43	0.77	7
2015–16	20	3	10	13	39	0.65	0.70	20

Season			Box score · all situations												5v5 individual				5v5 on ice					Season performance
Season	Age	Team	GP	G	A	P	+/−	PIM	SOG	Sh%	PPG	TOI/GP	Hits	Blk	P/60	ixG/60	SOG/60	xG/UA	xGF/60	xGA/60	xGF%	CF%	GF%	Perf/60	Grade	Rank
2022–23	37	CAR	73	9	13	22	4	16	80	11.3	2	11:52	—	—	1.46	0.77	5.62	0.095	3.28	2.33	58.5	61.2	—	—	—	—
2021–22	36	WPG	71	21	24	45	14	14	141	14.9	4	17:47	—	—	1.94	0.83	6.96	0.097	3.13	2.82	52.6	52.4	—	—	—	—
2020–21	35	WPG	56	13	16	29	-3	32	101	12.9	2	17:25	—	—	1.50	0.79	5.60	0.109	2.67	2.65	50.2	49.7	—	—	—	—
2019–20	34	VGK	71	17	21	38	6	24	136	12.5	5	17:08	—	—	1.49	0.92	6.16	0.111	2.92	2.15	57.6	56.5	—	—	—	—
2018–19	33	VGK	50	13	29	42	14	30	103	12.6	1	18:06	—	—	2.52	1.02	7.14	0.104	3.52	2.44	59.1	55.6	—	—	—	—
2017–18	32	STL, WPG	82	16	37	53	1	18	159	10.1	3	18:18	—	—	2.03	0.81	6.08	0.095	2.91	2.38	55.0	54.0	—	—	—	—
2016–17	31	STL	66	18	22	40	4	36	112	16.1	5	19:08	—	—	1.55	0.62	4.97	0.092	2.37	2.21	51.7	50.7	—	—	—	—
2015–16	30	STL	64	10	39	49	3	26	103	9.7	2	19:09	—	—	1.90	0.78	5.31	0.100	3.10	2.65	53.9	53.3	—	—	—	—
Career	—	8 seasons	533	117	201	318	43	196	935	12.5	24	17:17	—	—	1.80	0.81	5.98	0.100	2.97	2.45	54.7	54.1	—	—	—	—

Paul Stastny

Season performanceSelected-season standing and the components behind the scoreCollapse

Season metrics

Season vs reference

Season comparisons

Rolling Radar

Rolling Radar

On-ice impact5v5Elite 58.5% on-ice expected goal share at five-on-five (11th of 213)What the team creates and allows during the player’s five-on-five minutesExplore

Results vs expected

On ice vs off ice

Defense5v5 · AllElite 2.33 on-ice expected goals against per 60 (17th of 213)On-ice suppression and individual disciplineExplore

Defensive metrics

Discipline & puck management

Penaltiesnet —

Puck eventsnet —

Shooting & finishingAverage 0.77 individual expected goals per 60 (96th of 213)Where the player shoots, the quality of those chances, and actual versus expected goalsExplore

Shot map

Shooting by zone

Shot profile

Shot types

High-danger chances

Shot locations

Usage & deployment11:52 TOI per game (10:06 at five-on-five · 1:35 PP · 0:03 PK)Scoring by situation, zone starts and workloadExplore

Usage by situation

Where the 22 points come from · All situations

Zone starts — offensive of OZ + DZ

Shifts

Faceoffs

Usage by situation

Special teamsPP · PKPoor 2.08 power-play points per 60 (100th of 107)Power play and penalty killExplore

Power play

Penalty kill

FormExplore

Rolling Radar

Splits0.26 points per game at home · 0.34 awayVenue, rest and opponentExplore

By period and score state

Linemates5v5Most often with Derek Stepan: 314 five-on-five minutes, 59.4% xG share togetherWho he plays with at five-on-fiveExplore

Playoffs15 playoff games: 4 goals, 4 points · 90 career playoff gamesExplore

2022–23 playoffs

Playoff games

Every playoff run

Game log73 games · most recent at FLA, W 6–4: 0 G, 0 AOfficial totals and five-on-five evidenceExplore

Career8 NHL seasons: 533 games, 318 pointsEvery season and a recomputed career lineExplore

Data notesScopes, missing values and model evidenceExplore

2022–23 playoffs

Playoff games

Every playoff run

Defensive metrics

Discipline & puck management

Penaltiesnet —

Puck eventsnet —

Power play

Penalty kill

Results vs expected

On ice vs off ice

Shot map

Shooting by zone

Shot profile

Shot types

High-danger chances

Usage by situation

Where the 22 points come from · All situations

Zone starts — offensive of OZ + DZ

Shifts

Faceoffs

By period and score state

Season metrics

Season vs reference