Brad Marchand

Florida Panthers#63Left wing Shoots left

Age 38 · 5′9″ · 180 lb · Halifax, NS, CAN

No checked season results are available for this selection.

Games70T-328th in NHL

Goals320.46/GP▼0.09T-36th in NHL

Assists480.69/GP▼0.07T-35th in NHL

Points801.14/GP▼0.16T-33rd in NHL…

5v5 xG share63.9%1st of 123…

Avg TOI19:15160th in NHL…

Career awards

No checked season results are available for this selection.

No complete checked component breakdown is available for this selection.

Loading season standing and profile…

Season metrics

2021–22 · five-on-five · vs 123 positional peers

Player	Percentile	Rank
2.76		12 / 12391st
1.18		20 / 12384th
—	—	—

Shooting & finishing	Player	Percentile	Rank
	1.13		10 / 12393rd
	10.86		6 / 12396th
	16.91		12 / 12391st
	0.084		35 / 10768th
	0.05		42 / 10761st

Elite90+Strong70–89Average30–69Weak10–29Poor<10Bar length is the peer percentile, so longer is always better · tick at the 50th

How to read these comparisons

Player values are recorded season results. Peer averages are arithmetic means of qualified players in the selected group; each row uses the same peers for its average and rank. Ranks use unrounded values, with tied players sharing a rank and the next rank skipped. Lower xG against ranks better. Bar colours are the five performance tiers; context rows are blue and not graded. Differences from the average describe the season, not isolated player impact.

Goals above expected is the raw goals-minus-xG rate, without the shrinkage used in the older finishing comparison. On-ice measures include teammates, opponents and deployment. These recorded metrics describe different quantities from the adjusted Season score components beside them.

Skaters need 20 appearances and 300 five-on-five minutes; quality and finishing also need 75 unblocked attempts. Early in a season these minimums scale down with games played so far. At least 30 peers must qualify. Playoff ranks are withheld. A reviewed axis whose own evidence fails is withheld and shown with its reason rather than ranked. These workload rules do not express statistical confidence.

Position uses the NHL listed primary position available now; it does not establish historical position or actual deployment. Broad groups are forwards, defence and goalies. This version uses the current model’s covered games only.

Season vs reference

Reference

Per game · all situations

Metric2021–22ReferenceDiff

0.460.55-0.09

0.690.75-0.07

1.141.30-0.16

3.462.70+0.76

Reference: 2020–21 · 53 games.

Season comparisons

Loading peer comparisons and model evidence…

Optional recent-history profile

Rolling Radar

Recent NHL history, carried across seasons. The radar compares this broader profile with a fixed position-group reference.

Rolling profile is currently unavailable.

Rolling Radar

Loading recent-history profile…

Results vs expected

Five-on-five · what happened beside the chances created and allowed

Chances	Player	Percentile	Rank
	3.55		6 / 12396th
	2.01		3 / 12398th
	63.9		1 / 12399th

Player	Percentile	Rank
—	—	—
—	—	—
—	—	—

Player	Percentile	Rank
—	—	—
—	—	—
—	—	—

Context · not graded

5v5 goals: —
5v5 expected: 53.9–30.5
EPV added: +10.61

On ice vs off ice

Boston's share with Brad Marchand on the ice against the same team without him.

Share	On ice and off ice	On-minus-off gap in percentage points
xGF%	On ice 63.9% · Off ice unavailable	—
CF%	On ice 62.7% · Off ice unavailable	—
GF%	On ice unavailable · Off ice unavailable	—

On iceOff ice

Scale 40–65% · marker at 50% · right column is the on-minus-off gap in points

Loading model evidence…

Defensive metrics

Five-on-five on-ice suppression; individual events in all situations.

Player	Percentile	Rank
42.77		2 / 12399th
—	—	—
0.060		37 / 12370th

Player	Percentile	Rank
—	—	—
—	—	—
—	—	—

Physical style	Player	Percentile	Rank
	—	—	—
	—	—	—

Context · not graded

Evidence coverage: high danger 19 of 70 games.

Discipline & puck management

Recorded season event counts · all situations

Penaltiesnet —

Taken —Drawn —

Puck eventsnet —

Giveaways —Takeaways —

Blocks: —
Hits: —

Both penalty counts cover 26 of 70 games with every drawn role recorded.

Loading defensive evidence…

SituationChancesViewShot type

Shot map

All 306 attempts

Goal32Shot on goal210Missed shot64Blocked shot0Larger dot = higher xG

Shooting by zone

Hover a row to light it up · click to pin

Zone	Att	G	xG	Goal rate	Exp.	G−xG
High slot	109	14	11.5	12.8%	10.5%	+2.5
Inner slot	52	11	9.4	21.2%	18.1%	+1.6
Point	53	4	2.6	7.5%	5.0%	+1.4
Right circle	31	2	2.1	6.5%	6.6%	−0.1
Below goal line	2	0	0.2	0.0%	7.8%	−0.2
Left circle	25	0	0.7	0.0%	3.0%	−0.7
Outer slot	34	1	3.6	2.9%	10.7%	−2.6
All zones	306	32	30.1	10.5%	9.8%	+1.9

Finishing evidence. Scoring 10.5% on chances vs 9.8% expected (+0.6 points), led by high slot volume and tip-in finishing.

Sorted by goals minus expected goals. Goal rate is goals per unblocked attempt against the expected rate.

Shot profile

Context · not graded

On-net rate: 79.1%
Slot share: 52.6%
Average distance: 30.7 ft
Rebound attempts / 60: 0.80

Shot types

306 attempts

Type	Share	Sh%	G−xG
Wrist	66.0%	11.8%	−1.3
Snap	13.1%	16.1%	+1.5
Backhand	8.5%	10.5%	−0.1
Slap	7.2%	14.3%	−0.1
Tip-in	3.9%	37.5%	+2.2
Deflected	1.0%	—	−0.3
Other	0.3%	—	−0.1

Share is context, not a grade. Sh% counts shots on goal only.

High-danger chances

Model goal probability ≥ 0.20

Conversion35.3%+1.6 pts vs expected

Actual35.3%

Expected33.7%

Attempts: 34
Goals: 12
Expected goals: 11.4
G−xG: +0.6

Shot locations

Loading canonical shot events…

Usage by situation

Ice time, share of team ice time, scoring and scoring rate, with where shifts start.

Scope	TOI/GP	Team share	G	A	P	P/60
Five-on-five	13:02	—	18	24	42	2.76
Power play	3:27	—	7	20	27	6.72
Penalty kill	1:39	—	2	0	2	1.04
Other	1:08	—	5	4	9	6.85
All situations	19:15	—	32	48	80	3.56

Where the 80 points come from · All situations

Goals32 · 1.42/60
Primary assists— · —/60
Secondary assists— · —/60

Zone starts — offensive of OZ + DZ

Offensive —Neutral —Defensive —

Shifts

— a game · — average

Zone starts: five-on-five · Shifts: all situations

Usage by situation

Loading usage…

Power play

241:10 recorded ice time · peers need 100 minutes

Share of team PP: —
PP points: 27
Unit xGF / 60: 8.38

Player	Percentile	Rank
6.72		10 / 5984th
—	—	—
13.68		18 / 5971st
1.81		24 / 5960th
8.38		15 / 5976th
—	—	—

Evidence coverage: goals 13 of 70 games · team time 26 of 70 games.

Penalty kill

115:29 recorded ice time · peers need 100 minutes

Share of team PK: —
SH points: 2
Unit xGA / 60: 6.79

Player	Percentile	Rank
6.79		—
—	—	—
96.64		—
—	—	—
1.76		—

No rank yet

Evidence coverage: goals 11 of 66 games · high danger 11 of 66 games · team time 26 of 70 games.

Loading special teams…

Split	GP	G	A	P	P/GP	5v5 xG share	Team record
Venue
Home	36	16	29	45	1.25	65.8%	25–10–1
Away	34	16	19	35	1.03	61.9%	22–10–2
Rest
Back-to-back	10	2	6	8	0.80	50.9%	5–5–0
1 day of rest	41	24	30	54	1.32	65.3%	29–10–2
2+ days of rest	18	4	12	16	0.89	68.8%	12–5–1
Opponent
vs Eastern	41	18	33	51	1.24	64.8%	29–12–0
vs Western	29	14	15	29	1.00	62.6%	18–8–3
vs playoff teams	32	14	14	28	0.88	56.3%	15–15–2
vs non-playoff teams	38	18	34	52	1.37	70.4%	32–5–1
Recent
Last 10	10	1	7	8	0.80	59.7%	6–4–0

Split	G	A	P	5v5 xG share	5v5 CF%	5v5 GF–GA
Period
1st period	8	15	23	—	—	—
2nd period	16	19	35	—	—	—
3rd period	7	13	20	—	—	—
Overtime	1	1	2	—	—	—
Score state · 5v5 on ice
Leading	—	—	—	58.9%	55.8%	11–14
Tied	—	—	—	63.9%	64.1%	15–8
Trailing	—	—	—	67.9%	66.0%	9–11

Teammate	Pos	TOI together	xG share together	GF–GA	CF%	Him without	Teammate without
Patrice Bergeron	C	764:34	65.7%	33–30	63.9%	47.0%	68.4%
Charlie McAvoy	D	545:35	65.8%	25–16	64.1%	57.8%	58.3%
Jake DeBrusk	L	358:51	61.8%	16–13	63.0%	63.4%	55.1%
Matt Grzelcyk	D	351:07	67.6%	15–11	64.6%	60.0%	56.1%
David Pastrnak	R	305:38	66.4%	9–9	63.7%	61.0%	59.7%
Mike Reilly	D	234:23	61.2%	8–9	61.2%	63.2%	57.8%
Brandon Carlo	D	227:50	58.2%	7–9	56.7%	64.1%	53.0%
Craig Smith	C	209:34	61.8%	9–11	60.7%	63.0%	56.5%
Derek Forbort	D	204:31	53.2%	4–8	55.9%	65.4%	49.9%
Connor Clifton	D	108:39	54.2%	2–6	60.1%	63.7%	54.8%
Hampus Lindholm	D	60:37	60.1%	5–2	60.6%	63.0%	62.4%
Urho Vaakanainen	D	58:51	64.1%	2–2	57.4%	62.7%	48.7%

	Opponent	Result		G	A		PPP	+/−	SOG		5v5 on-ice xG share	Game
May 14	@ CAR	L 2–3	20:17	0	0	0	—	2	3	0.11	63.5%	View →
May 12	vs CAR	W 5–2	18:15	1	1	2	1	0	3	0.29	55.8%	View →
May 10	@ CAR	L 1–5	21:04	0	0	0	0	0	4	0.28	71.2%	View →
May 8	vs CAR	W 5–2	22:45	2	3	5	2	3	5	0.07	77.8%	View →
May 6	vs CAR	W 4–2	19:45	1	2	3	—	1	1	0.31	77.6%	View →
May 4	@ CAR	L 2–5	20:32	0	1	1	1	0	3	0.04	67.7%	View →
May 2	@ CAR	L 1–5	18:24	0	0	0	0	-3	2	0.04	63.3%	View →
Filtered 7	—	3–4	20:09 avg	4	7	11	—	3	21	1.15	68.0%	—

Season	GP	G	A	P	SOG	P/GP	5v5 ixG/60	5v5 GP
2024–25	23	10	10	20	47	0.87	0.93	23
2023–24	11	3	7	10	20	0.91	0.40	11
2022–23	7	4	6	10	25	1.43	0.90	7
2021–22	7	4	7	11	21	1.57	0.81	7
2020–21	11	8	4	12	32	1.09	0.93	11
2019–20	13	7	5	12	28	0.92	0.61	13
2018–19	24	9	14	23	72	0.96	0.76	24
2017–18	12	4	13	17	30	1.42	0.73	12
2016–17	6	1	3	4	18	0.67	0.89	6

	Opponent	Result		G	A		PPP	+/−	SOG		5v5 on-ice xG share	Game
Apr 28	vs BUF	W 5–0	15:55	0	2	2	—	3	1	0.16	53.1%	View →
Apr 26	vs FLA	W 4–2	20:00	1	1	2	0	2	5	0.12	76.8%	View →
Apr 24	@ MTL	W 5–3	16:51	0	2	2	0	2	2	0.11	90.1%	View →
Apr 23	vs NYR	W 3–1	19:30	0	1	1	0	1	3	0.07	50.4%	View →
Apr 21	@ PIT	L 0–4	19:38	0	0	0	0	-2	8	0.50	67.8%	View →
Apr 19	@ STL	W 3–2 OT	17:42	0	0	0	—	1	0	0.00	60.8%	View →
Apr 16	vs PIT	W 2–1	22:16	0	0	0	—	0	2	0.14	62.8%	View →
Apr 14	vs OTT	L 2–3	18:44	0	0	0	—	-1	3	0.18	59.6%	View →
Apr 12	vs STL	L 2–4	21:54	0	1	1	0	-1	6	0.58	55.8%	View →
Apr 10	@ WSH	L 2–4	23:15	0	0	0	0	-2	5	0.41	42.9%	View →
Filtered 10	—	6–4–0	19:35 avg	1	7	8	—	3	35	2.27	59.7%	—

Season	Box score · all situations	5v5 individual	5v5 on ice	Season performance
2026–27	38	FLA	2	1	0	1	0	0	5	20.0	0	11:23	2	0	0.00	0.87	9.59	0.054	2.45	1.11	68.9	69.7	0.0	—	—	—
2025–26	37	FLA	52	27	27	54	-16	38	138	19.6	6	17:44	—	—	2.52	0.79	8.42	0.060	2.65	3.04	46.6	49.8	—	—	—	—
2024–25	36	BOS, FLA	71	23	28	51	-7	64	194	11.9	5	18:19	—	—	—	—	—	0.073	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
2023–24	35	BOS	82	29	38	67	2	78	207	14.0	7	19:06	—	—	1.60	0.71	7.07	0.070	2.68	2.57	51.1	49.1	—	—	—	—
2022–23	34	BOS	73	21	46	67	27	74	183	11.5	9	18:32	—	—	2.07	1.02	7.84	0.096	3.78	2.35	61.7	57.0	—	—	—	—
2021–22	33	BOS	70	32	48	80	16	97	242	13.2	7	19:15	—	—	2.76	1.13	10.86	0.084	3.55	2.01	63.9	62.7	—	—	—	—
2020–21	32	BOS	53	29	40	69	26	46	143	20.3	4	18:55	—	—	3.21	0.86	7.46	0.092	2.98	2.01	59.7	61.1	—	—	—	—
2019–20	31	BOS	70	28	59	87	25	82	185	15.1	5	19:27	—	—	3.10	0.75	7.46	0.080	2.85	2.18	56.7	56.4	—	—	—	—
2018–19	30	BOS	79	36	64	100	15	96	231	15.6	10	19:37	—	—	2.65	0.85	8.51	0.069	3.02	2.49	54.7	54.9	—	—	—	—
2017–18	29	BOS	68	34	51	85	25	63	182	18.7	8	19:43	—	—	2.81	0.91	7.73	0.087	2.97	2.39	55.4	56.3	—	—	—	—
2016–17	28	BOS	80	39	46	85	18	81	226	17.3	9	19:26	—	—	2.39	0.83	8.31	0.070	3.05	2.09	59.4	60.3	—	—	—	—
2015–16	27	BOS	77	37	24	61	21	90	250	14.8	6	18:36	—	—	2.00	0.86	10.52	0.064	2.75	2.15	56.2	55.0	—	—	—	—
Career	—	12 seasons	777	336	471	807	152	809	2186	15.4	76	18:59	—	—	—	—	—	0.076	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—

2 award records

Stanley Cup · 2024–25
Stanley Cup · 2010–11

Every metric name opens its definition; the full list lives in Metrics.

Traditional statistics cover all situations. Supporting five-on-five analyses use completed games, raw adjustment and exposure from xG model v4. The two samples can differ.

An em dash means unavailable, not zero. A partial season remains partial. Where a panel reports evidence coverage, its rates use only the covered games. History never substitutes a different model, and a missing appearance interrupts a rolling model window.

Shot maps use the same shot model as Game Center and show which model version scored recent shots beside the rink. Older seasons can use earlier model versions. High danger means a model scoring probability of at least 0.20 on an unblocked attempt; for goalies, medium danger is 0.08 to 0.20 and low is below 0.08.

Special-team buckets include the wider recorded man-advantage and man-down states, read from the player’s own team; for a goalie, penalty kill means facing a power play. Their ranks need 100 recorded minutes and at least 30 qualified peers; below 100 minutes, penalty-kill percentiles are provisional. Playoff values have no ranks or percentiles. Team share is player ice time divided by team ice time in that situation, over the games the player dressed. Zone starts describe faceoff-started five-on-five shifts and exclude on-the-fly starts.

Penalties count events, including one for a double minor; bench and served-by roles are excluded, and victimless infractions have no drawn role. EPV added sums changes in the probability that the possessing team scores next; it is not standings points or an isolated player grade. Rolling windows never cross seasons or season types, and a missed game is not a zero-performance appearance. Career rates use summed counts and exposure, never an average of season rates; a missing contributing season withholds its career metric, and Performance begins in 2023–24.

Explore the full methodology →

Season			Box score · all situations												5v5 individual				5v5 on ice					Season performance
Season	Age	Team	GP	G	A	P	+/−	PIM	SOG	Sh%	PPG	TOI/GP	Hits	Blk	P/60	ixG/60	SOG/60	xG/UA	xGF/60	xGA/60	xGF%	CF%	GF%	Perf/60	Grade	Rank
2026–27	38	FLA	2	1	0	1	0	0	5	20.0	0	11:23	2	0	0.00	0.87	9.59	0.054	2.45	1.11	68.9	69.7	0.0	—	—	—
2025–26	37	FLA	52	27	27	54	-16	38	138	19.6	6	17:44	—	—	2.52	0.79	8.42	0.060	2.65	3.04	46.6	49.8	—	—	—	—
2024–25	36	BOS, FLA	71	23	28	51	-7	64	194	11.9	5	18:19	—	—	—	—	—	0.073	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
2023–24	35	BOS	82	29	38	67	2	78	207	14.0	7	19:06	—	—	1.60	0.71	7.07	0.070	2.68	2.57	51.1	49.1	—	—	—	—
2022–23	34	BOS	73	21	46	67	27	74	183	11.5	9	18:32	—	—	2.07	1.02	7.84	0.096	3.78	2.35	61.7	57.0	—	—	—	—
2021–22	33	BOS	70	32	48	80	16	97	242	13.2	7	19:15	—	—	2.76	1.13	10.86	0.084	3.55	2.01	63.9	62.7	—	—	—	—
2020–21	32	BOS	53	29	40	69	26	46	143	20.3	4	18:55	—	—	3.21	0.86	7.46	0.092	2.98	2.01	59.7	61.1	—	—	—	—
2019–20	31	BOS	70	28	59	87	25	82	185	15.1	5	19:27	—	—	3.10	0.75	7.46	0.080	2.85	2.18	56.7	56.4	—	—	—	—
2018–19	30	BOS	79	36	64	100	15	96	231	15.6	10	19:37	—	—	2.65	0.85	8.51	0.069	3.02	2.49	54.7	54.9	—	—	—	—
2017–18	29	BOS	68	34	51	85	25	63	182	18.7	8	19:43	—	—	2.81	0.91	7.73	0.087	2.97	2.39	55.4	56.3	—	—	—	—
2016–17	28	BOS	80	39	46	85	18	81	226	17.3	9	19:26	—	—	2.39	0.83	8.31	0.070	3.05	2.09	59.4	60.3	—	—	—	—
2015–16	27	BOS	77	37	24	61	21	90	250	14.8	6	18:36	—	—	2.00	0.86	10.52	0.064	2.75	2.15	56.2	55.0	—	—	—	—
Career	—	12 seasons	777	336	471	807	152	809	2186	15.4	76	18:59	—	—	—	—	—	0.076	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—

Brad Marchand

Season performanceSelected-season standing and the components behind the scoreCollapse

Season metrics

Season vs reference

Season comparisons

Rolling Radar

Rolling Radar

On-ice impact5v5Elite 63.9% on-ice expected goal share at five-on-five (1st of 123)What the team creates and allows during the player’s five-on-five minutesExplore

Results vs expected

On ice vs off ice

Defense5v5 · AllElite 2.01 on-ice expected goals against per 60 (3rd of 123)On-ice suppression and individual disciplineExplore

Defensive metrics

Discipline & puck management

Penaltiesnet —

Puck eventsnet —

Shooting & finishingElite 1.13 individual expected goals per 60 (10th of 123)Where the player shoots, the quality of those chances, and actual versus expected goalsExplore

Shot map

Shooting by zone

Shot profile

Shot types

High-danger chances

Shot locations

Usage & deployment19:15 TOI per game (13:02 at five-on-five · 3:27 PP · 1:39 PK)Scoring by situation, zone starts and workloadExplore

Usage by situation

Where the 80 points come from · All situations

Zone starts — offensive of OZ + DZ

Shifts

Usage by situation

Special teamsPP · PKStrong 6.72 power-play points per 60 (10th of 59)Power play and penalty killExplore

Power play

Penalty kill

FormExplore

Rolling Radar

Splits1.25 points per game at home · 1.03 awayVenue, rest and opponentExplore

By period and score state

Linemates5v5Most often with Patrice Bergeron: 765 five-on-five minutes, 65.7% xG share togetherWho he plays with at five-on-fiveExplore

Playoffs7 playoff games: 4 goals, 11 points · 114 career playoff gamesExplore

2021–22 playoffs

Playoff games

Every playoff run

Game log70 games · most recent vs BUF, W 5–0: 0 G, 2 AOfficial totals and five-on-five evidenceExplore

Career12 NHL seasons: 777 games, 807 pointsEvery season and a recomputed career lineExplore

Data notesScopes, missing values and model evidenceExplore

2021–22 playoffs

Playoff games

Every playoff run

Defensive metrics

Discipline & puck management

Penaltiesnet —

Puck eventsnet —

Power play

Penalty kill

Results vs expected

On ice vs off ice

Shot map

Shooting by zone

Shot profile

Shot types

High-danger chances

Usage by situation

Where the 80 points come from · All situations

Zone starts — offensive of OZ + DZ

Shifts

By period and score state

Season metrics

Season vs reference