Mark Stone

Vegas Golden Knights#61Right wing Shoots right

Age 34 · 6′3″ · 210 lb · Winnipeg, MB, CAN

Season grade: Withheld; Incomplete data; Performance / 600.2336/66 GP

Loading season standing…

Games66T-435th in NHL

Goals190.29/GP0.00T-148th in NHL

Assists480.73/GP▲0.07T-33rd in NHL

Points671.02/GP▲0.07T-54th in NHL…

5v5 xG share—…

Avg TOI19:15T-169th in NHL…

Career awards

Not qualified · 2024–25 forwards

Playing-time minimum met. Rank withheld because the app’s scoring data are incomplete. The app has checked scoring results for 36 of 41 appearances (87.8%); season standings require at least 90%. Scoring data cover less than 90% of recorded workload or could not be verified.

Percentiles appear once this player qualifies for season standings. The score breakdown is under How this is calculated.

How this is calculated

Score breakdown

Component	Weight	Scaled	Contribution
Offense	25%	0.581	+0.145
Defense	25%	0.040	+0.010
Chance creation	20%	−0.053	−0.011
Finishing	10%	−0.003	−0.000
Assisting	20%	0.444	+0.089
Performance rate			0.233

Per 60 rated minutes, over the scored appearances. Each component is scaled separately, then weighted; the contributions add to the performance rate at full precision, so rounded figures may differ.

Scoring

Season grade is the qualified peer percentile on the same letter bands as Game Grade — A+ ≥88, A ≥78, A− ≥68, B+ ≥58, B ≥50, B− ≥42, C+ ≥35, C ≥28, C− ≥22, D ≥15, F below 15 — and needs qualification plus at least 30 eligible peers. The letter describes this season’s performance, not permanent ability.

Comparisons

Rank and component percentiles compare this season’s qualified forwards on unrounded rates over every checked appearance; Game Grade compares one appearance with frozen historical games.

Component percentiles are never averaged into the score. Recent history is optional, from up to three completed prior seasons; small samples are provisional.

Coverage

Qualification: 16 covered appearances, 268.1 rated minutes, and 90% appearance and workload coverage. Minimums advance with league progress; valid low-sample results stay visible.

Rated minutes exclude play with a goalie pulled: 23.9 min excluded; official TOI 700.9 min.

Coverage: partial. Updated Oct 17, 2026.

Method

Five weighted components add to the performance rate. Five-on-five offense and defense account for recorded teammates, opponents and game state, so shared on-ice results are not isolated individual ability. Finishing is scored against the shot model’s historical-shooter expectation and assisting counts primary assists plus half of secondary assists; both use the strength baseline, chance creation its positional baseline.

Loading season standing and profile…

Season metrics

2024–25 · five-on-five · vs 7 positional peers

Player	Percentile	Rank
—	—	—
—	—	—
—	—	—

Player	Percentile	Rank
—	—	—
—	—	—
—	—	—
0.094		—
—	—	—

Elite90+Strong70–89Average30–69Weak10–29Poor<10No rank yetBar length is the peer percentile, so longer is always better · tick at the 50th

How to read these comparisons

Player values are recorded season results. Peer averages are arithmetic means of qualified players in the selected group; each row uses the same peers for its average and rank. Ranks use unrounded values, with tied players sharing a rank and the next rank skipped. Lower xG against ranks better. Bar colours are the five performance tiers; context rows are blue and not graded. Differences from the average describe the season, not isolated player impact.

Goals above expected is the raw goals-minus-xG rate, without the shrinkage used in the older finishing comparison. On-ice measures include teammates, opponents and deployment. These recorded metrics describe different quantities from the adjusted Season score components beside them.

Skaters need 20 appearances and 300 five-on-five minutes; quality and finishing also need 75 unblocked attempts. Early in a season these minimums scale down with games played so far. At least 30 peers must qualify. Playoff ranks are withheld. A reviewed axis whose own evidence fails is withheld and shown with its reason rather than ranked. These workload rules do not express statistical confidence.

Position uses the NHL listed primary position available now; it does not establish historical position or actual deployment. Broad groups are forwards, defence and goalies. This version uses the current model’s covered games only.

Season vs reference

Reference

Per game · all situations

Metric2024–25ReferenceDiff

0.290.29+0.00

0.730.66+0.07

1.020.95+0.07

1.982.09-0.10

Reference: 2023–24 · 56 games.

Season comparisons

Loading peer comparisons and model evidence…

Optional recent-history profile

Rolling Radar

Recent NHL history, carried across seasons. The radar compares this broader profile with a fixed position-group reference.

Rolling profile is currently unavailable.

Rolling Radar

Loading recent-history profile…

Results vs expected

Five-on-five · what happened beside the chances created and allowed

Player	Percentile	Rank
—	—	—
—	—	—
—	—	—

Player	Percentile	Rank
—	—	—
—	—	—
—	—	—

Player	Percentile	Rank
—	—	—
—	—	—
—	—	—

Context · not graded

5v5 goals: —
5v5 expected: —
EPV added: +4.19

On ice vs off ice

Vegas's share with Mark Stone on the ice against the same team without him.

Share	On ice and off ice	On-minus-off gap in percentage points
xGF%	On ice unavailable · Off ice unavailable	—
CF%	On ice unavailable · Off ice unavailable	—
GF%	On ice unavailable · Off ice unavailable	—

On iceOff ice

Scale 40–65% · marker at 50% · right column is the on-minus-off gap in points

Loading model evidence…

Defensive metrics

Five-on-five on-ice suppression; individual events in all situations.

Player	Percentile	Rank
—	—	—
—	—	—
—	—	—

Player	Percentile	Rank
—	—	—
—	—	—
—	—	—

Physical style	Player	Percentile	Rank
	—	—	—
	—	—	—

Context · not graded

Evidence coverage: high danger 25 of 63 games.

Discipline & puck management

Recorded season event counts · all situations

Penaltiesnet —

Taken —Drawn —

Puck eventsnet —

Giveaways —Takeaways —

Blocks: —
Hits: —

Both penalty counts cover 25 of 66 games with every drawn role recorded.

Loading defensive evidence…

SituationChancesViewShot type

Shot map

All 191 attempts

Goal19Shot on goal112Missed shot60Blocked shot0Larger dot = higher xG

Shooting by zone

Hover a row to light it up · click to pin

Zone	Att	G	xG	Goal rate	Exp.	G−xG
Inner slot	64	11	9.3	17.2%	14.5%	+1.7
Left circle	2	0	0.1	0.0%	3.2%	−0.1
Outer slot	11	1	1.2	9.1%	10.8%	−0.2
Right circle	7	0	0.2	0.0%	3.0%	−0.2
Below goal line	5	0	0.3	0.0%	5.7%	−0.3
Point	35	1	1.7	2.9%	4.8%	−0.7
High slot	67	6	8.1	9.0%	12.0%	−2.1
All zones	191	19	20.8	9.9%	10.9%	−1.8

Finishing evidence. Scoring 9.9% on chances vs 10.9% expected (−0.9 points), with the largest shortfall in the high slot.

Sorted by goals minus expected goals. Goal rate is goals per unblocked attempt against the expected rate.

Shot profile

Context · not graded

On-net rate: 68.6%
Slot share: 68.6%
Average distance: 28.2 ft
Rebound attempts / 60: 0.85

Shot types

191 attempts

Type	Share	Sh%	G−xG
Wrist	41.4%	13.7%	−1.4
Tip-in	20.4%	18.5%	+0.6
Snap	15.7%	17.4%	+0.2
Backhand	8.9%	10.0%	−1.0
Slap	8.9%	6.7%	+0.1
Other	2.6%	—	−0.7
Deflected	2.1%	25.0%	+0.3

Share is context, not a grade. Sh% counts shots on goal only.

High-danger chances

Model goal probability ≥ 0.20

Conversion47.4%+12.9 pts vs expected

Actual47.4%

Expected34.5%

Attempts: 19
Goals: 9
Expected goals: 6.6
G−xG: +2.4

Shot locations

Loading canonical shot events…

Usage by situation

Ice time, share of team ice time, scoring and scoring rate, with where shifts start.

Scope	TOI/GP	Team share	G	A	P	P/60
Five-on-five	—	—	12	19	31	—
Power play	—	—	5	20	25	—
Penalty kill	—	—	0	1	1	—
Other	—	—	2	8	10	—
All situations	19:15	—	19	48	67	3.16

Where the 67 points come from · All situations

Goals19 · 0.90/60
Primary assists— · —/60
Secondary assists— · —/60

Zone starts — offensive of OZ + DZ

Offensive —Neutral —Defensive —

Shifts

— a game · — average

Zone starts: five-on-five · Shifts: all situations

Usage by situation

Loading usage…

Power play

— recorded ice time · peers need 100 minutes

Share of team PP: —
PP points: 25
Unit xGF / 60: —

Player	Percentile	Rank
—	—	—
—	—	—
—	—	—
—	—	—
—	—	—
—	—	—

Evidence coverage: goals 9 of 62 games · team time 25 of 66 games.

Penalty kill

— recorded ice time · peers need 100 minutes

Share of team PK: —
SH points: 1
Unit xGA / 60: —

Player	Percentile	Rank
—	—	—
—	—	—
—	—	—
—	—	—
—	—	—

Evidence coverage: goals 10 of 56 games · high danger 11 of 56 games · team time 25 of 66 games.

Loading special teams…

Split	GP	G	A	P	P/GP	5v5 xG share	Team record
Venue
Home	36	12	26	38	1.06	59.1%	27–6–3
Away	30	7	22	29	0.97	56.3%	14–12–4
Rest
Back-to-back	9	1	10	11	1.22	65.8%	6–3–0
1 day of rest	37	9	24	33	0.89	52.6%	18–12–7
2+ days of rest	19	7	13	20	1.05	63.2%	16–3–0
Opponent
vs Eastern	26	7	14	21	0.81	53.5%	13–9–4
vs Western	40	12	34	46	1.15	61.2%	28–9–3
vs playoff teams	31	7	26	33	1.06	50.8%	16–11–4
vs non-playoff teams	35	12	22	34	0.97	64.2%	25–7–3
Recent
Last 10	10	1	5	6	0.60	65.0%	7–2–1

Teammate	Pos	TOI together	xG share together	GF–GA	CF%	Him without	Teammate without
Jack Eichel	C	791:27	54.6%	32–31	51.1%	66.9%	53.5%
Ivan Barbashev	L	506:19	52.1%	20–21	50.2%	62.6%	53.5%
Noah Hanifin	D	378:13	56.2%	25–16	53.7%	57.3%	55.5%
Shea Theodore	D	377:23	53.4%	9–13	51.1%	58.5%	54.9%
Alex Pietrangelo	D	369:52	58.3%	20–9	53.6%	55.7%	51.8%
Brayden McNabb	D	349:34	59.6%	8–11	52.0%	55.5%	55.7%
Zach Whitecloud	D	208:04	53.9%	11–10	49.5%	57.8%	54.1%
Nicolas Hague	D	155:27	54.4%	4–8	49.1%	57.3%	47.8%
Victor Olofsson	L	130:31	58.3%	4–6	54.2%	56.6%	53.2%
Brett Howden	C	106:03	69.2%	8–3	58.0%	55.2%	48.2%
Tanner Pearson	L	104:56	56.8%	3–1	53.4%	56.8%	48.0%
Brandon Saad	L	82:00	63.9%	6–4	58.5%	55.9%	61.5%

	Opponent	Result		G	A		PPP	+/−	SOG		5v5 on-ice xG share	Game
May 12	@ EDM	L 0–3	21:42	0	0	0	—	-1	1	0.01	35.7%	View →
May 10	@ EDM	W 4–3	5:54	0	0	0	—	-1	1	0.00	19.3%	View →
May 8	vs EDM	L 4–5 OT	26:55	0	2	2	—	-1	1	0.12	69.0%	View →
May 6	vs EDM	L 2–4	19:07	2	0	2	—	0	2	0.15	45.1%	View →
May 1	@ MIN	W 3–2	22:21	1	1	2	—	2	4	0.30	65.1%	View →
Apr 29	vs MIN	W 3–2 OT	22:26	1	0	1	—	1	3	0.18	74.4%	View →
Apr 26	@ MIN	W 4–3 OT	26:42	0	1	1	—	1	4	0.13	59.0%	View →
Apr 24	@ MIN	L 2–5	24:23	0	0	0	0	-2	2	0.09	34.9%	View →
Apr 22	vs MIN	L 2–5	17:17	0	0	0	0	-3	1	0.08	24.7%	View →
Apr 20	vs MIN	W 4–2	17:16	0	0	0	0	0	2	0.42	57.2%	View →
Filtered 10	—	5–5	20:24 avg	4	4	8	—	-4	21	1.49	51.3%	—

	Opponent	Result		G	A		PPP	+/−	SOG		5v5 on-ice xG share	Game
Apr 12	vs NSH	W 5–3	16:28	0	0	0	—	0	0	0.09	—	View →
Apr 10	vs SEA	W 2–1	17:37	0	0	0	—	1	0	0.01	—	View →
Apr 8	@ COL	OTL 2–3 SO	18:55	0	0	0	—	-1	0	0.00	—	View →
Apr 6	@ VAN	W 3–2	17:24	0	1	1	—	0	1	0.18	63.7%	View →
Apr 5	@ CGY	W 3–2 OT	20:38	0	0	0	—	0	2	0.37	56.8%	View →
Apr 3	vs WPG	L 0–4	17:53	0	0	0	0	0	2	0.32	67.2%	View →
Apr 1	vs EDM	L 2–3	17:28	0	0	0	—	-2	0	0.00	49.5%	View →
Mar 29	@ NSH	W 3–1	17:46	0	1	1	0	1	3	0.22	82.9%	View →
Mar 28	@ CHI	W 5–3	18:55	1	1	2	0	2	3	0.47	67.1%	View →
Mar 25	@ MIN	W 5–1	16:39	0	2	2	0	1	3	0.28	59.9%	View →
Filtered 10	—	7–2–1	17:58 avg	1	5	6	—	2	14	1.94	—	—

Teammate	Pos	TOI together	xG share together	GF–GA	CF%	Him without	Teammate without
Jack Eichel	C	791:27	54.6%	32–31	51.1%	66.9%	53.5%
Ivan Barbashev	L	506:19	52.1%	20–21	50.2%	62.6%	53.5%
Noah Hanifin	D	378:13	56.2%	25–16	53.7%	57.3%	55.5%
Shea Theodore	D	377:23	53.4%	9–13	51.1%	58.5%	54.9%
Alex Pietrangelo	D	369:52	58.3%	20–9	53.6%	55.7%	51.8%
Brayden McNabb	D	349:34	59.6%	8–11	52.0%	55.5%	55.7%
Zach Whitecloud	D	208:04	53.9%	11–10	49.5%	57.8%	54.1%
Nicolas Hague	D	155:27	54.4%	4–8	49.1%	57.3%	47.8%
Victor Olofsson	L	130:31	58.3%	4–6	54.2%	56.6%	53.2%
Brett Howden	C	106:03	69.2%	8–3	58.0%	55.2%	48.2%
Tanner Pearson	L	104:56	56.8%	3–1	53.4%	56.8%	48.0%
Brandon Saad	L	82:00	63.9%	6–4	58.5%	55.9%	61.5%

Split	G	A	P	5v5 xG share	5v5 CF%	5v5 GF–GA
Period
1st period	6	15	21	—	—	—
2nd period	7	12	19	—	—	—
3rd period	6	20	26	—	—	—
Overtime	0	1	1	—	—	—
Score state · 5v5 on ice
Leading	—	—	—	54.0%	48.0%	14–13
Tied	—	—	—	60.0%	52.2%	17–9
Trailing	—	—	—	56.4%	58.0%	9–12

Season	GP	G	A	P	SOG	P/GP	5v5 ixG/60	5v5 GP
2025–26	17	7	5	12	37	0.71	0.63	17
2024–25	10	4	4	8	21	0.80	0.62	10
2023–24	7	3	0	3	10	0.43	0.14	7
2022–23	22	11	13	24	49	1.09	0.92	22
2020–21	19	5	3	8	32	0.42	0.56	19
2019–20	20	7	10	17	41	0.85	0.84	20
2018–19	7	6	6	12	16	1.71	1.14	7
2016–17	19	5	3	8	43	0.42	0.56	19

Season			Box score · all situations												5v5 individual				5v5 on ice					Season performance
Season	Age	Team	GP	G	A	P	+/−	PIM	SOG	Sh%	PPG	TOI/GP	Hits	Blk	P/60	ixG/60	SOG/60	xG/UA	xGF/60	xGA/60	xGF%	CF%	GF%	Perf/60	Grade	Rank
2026–27	34	VGK	11	8	7	15	9	9	22	36.4	2	18:12	11	8	2.62	0.93	4.36	0.107	2.75	2.22	55.3	54.5	83.3	—	—	—
2025–26	33	VGK	60	28	45	73	26	9	130	21.5	9	19:13	—	—	2.46	0.87	6.05	0.092	3.06	1.99	60.6	55.7	—	—	—	—
2024–25	32	VGK	66	19	48	67	22	14	131	14.5	5	19:15	—	—	—	—	—	0.094	—	—	—	—	—	0.233	—	—
2023–24	31	VGK	56	16	37	53	1	22	117	13.7	4	19:24	—	—	2.38	0.58	6.07	0.072	2.86	2.61	52.3	48.0	—	—	—	—
2022–23	30	VGK	43	17	21	38	11	10	113	15.0	3	19:23	—	—	2.32	1.26	7.64	0.117	3.33	2.27	59.4	52.5	—	—	—	—
2021–22	29	VGK	37	9	21	30	7	8	71	12.7	3	18:21	—	—	2.56	0.80	6.18	0.100	2.95	2.48	54.3	51.5	—	—	—	—
2020–21	28	VGK	55	21	40	61	26	28	98	21.4	6	19:04	—	—	2.92	0.68	5.28	0.093	2.91	2.15	57.5	52.1	—	—	—	—
2019–20	27	VGK	65	21	42	63	15	27	168	12.5	6	19:25	—	—	2.44	1.01	8.17	0.090	3.44	2.12	61.8	58.0	—	—	—	—
2018–19	26	OTT, VGK	77	33	40	73	17	27	199	16.6	6	19:53	—	—	2.29	0.88	7.07	0.087	3.28	2.47	57.0	53.1	—	—	—	—
2017–18	25	OTT	58	20	42	62	9	10	132	15.2	1	20:40	—	—	2.86	0.87	6.55	0.096	2.94	2.54	53.6	51.5	—	—	—	—
2016–17	24	OTT	71	22	32	54	12	25	134	16.4	6	18:34	—	—	1.94	0.65	5.70	0.084	2.65	2.28	53.8	54.2	—	—	—	—
2015–16	23	OTT	75	23	38	61	-4	38	151	15.2	5	20:07	—	—	1.85	0.61	5.45	0.078	2.44	2.36	50.8	51.8	—	—	—	—
Career	—	12 seasons	674	237	413	650	151	227	1466	16.2	56	19:25	—	—	—	—	—	0.091	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—

Mark Stone

Season performanceSelected-season standing and the components behind the scoreCollapse

Score breakdown

Scoring

Comparisons

Coverage

Method

Season metrics

Season vs reference

Season comparisons

Rolling Radar

Rolling Radar

On-ice impact5v5What the team creates and allows during the player’s five-on-five minutesWhat the team creates and allows during the player’s five-on-five minutesExplore

Results vs expected

On ice vs off ice

Defense5v5 · AllOn-ice suppression and individual disciplineOn-ice suppression and individual disciplineExplore

Defensive metrics

Discipline & puck management

Penaltiesnet —

Puck eventsnet —

Shooting & finishingWhere the player shoots, the quality of those chances, and actual versus expected goalsWhere the player shoots, the quality of those chances, and actual versus expected goalsExplore

Shot map

Shooting by zone

Shot profile

Shot types

High-danger chances

Shot locations

Usage & deployment19:15 TOI per gameScoring by situation, zone starts and workloadExplore

Usage by situation

Where the 67 points come from · All situations

Zone starts — offensive of OZ + DZ

Shifts

Usage by situation

Special teamsPP · PKPower play and penalty killPower play and penalty killExplore

Power play

Penalty kill

FormExplore

Rolling Radar

Splits1.06 points per game at home · 0.97 awayVenue, rest and opponentExplore

By period and score state

Linemates5v5Most often with Jack Eichel: 791 five-on-five minutes, 54.6% xG share togetherWho he plays with at five-on-fiveExplore

Playoffs10 playoff games: 4 goals, 8 points · 121 career playoff gamesExplore

2024–25 playoffs

Playoff games

Every playoff run

Game log66 games · most recent vs NSH, W 5–3: 0 G, 0 AOfficial totals and five-on-five evidenceExplore

Career12 NHL seasons: 674 games, 650 pointsEvery season and a recomputed career lineExplore

Data notesScopes, missing values and model evidenceExplore

Score breakdown

Scoring

Comparisons

Coverage

Method

2024–25 playoffs

Playoff games

Every playoff run

Defensive metrics

Discipline & puck management

Penaltiesnet —

Puck eventsnet —

Power play

Penalty kill

Results vs expected

On ice vs off ice

Shot map

Shooting by zone

Shot profile

Shot types

High-danger chances

Usage by situation

Where the 67 points come from · All situations

Zone starts — offensive of OZ + DZ

Shifts

By period and score state

Season metrics

Season vs reference