Ryan Dzingel — 2018–19 stats and season rank | IceSheet
Ryan Dzingel
Team not recorded·#19·Center · Shoots left
Age 34 · 6′0″ · 190 lb · Wheaton, Illinois, USA
No checked season results are available for this selection.
Games78T-192nd in NHL
Goals260.33/GP▲0.04T-69th in NHL
Assists300.38/GP▲0.16T-111th in NHL
Points560.72/GP▲0.20…
P / GP0.72▲0.20…
Avg TOI16:49…
/
Loading season standing and profile…
Season comparisons
Loading peer comparisons and model evidence…
Optional recent-history profile
Rolling Radar
Loading recent-history profile…
Loading model evidence…
Loading defensive evidence…
Shot locations
Loading canonical shot events…
Loading usage…
Loading special teams…
T-79th in NHL
103rd in NHL
316th in NHL
No checked season results are available for this selection.
No complete checked component breakdown is available for this selection.
Rolling Radar
Recent NHL history, carried across seasons. The radar compares this broader profile with a fixed position-group reference.
Rolling profile is currently unavailable.
Ryan Dzingel
195 attempts19.07 xG26 G
Goal26Shot on goal133Missed shot36Blocked shot0Larger dot = higher xG
Shooting by zone
Zone
Shots
xG
Goals
S%
High slot
64
6.8
7
10.9%
Inner slot
60
8.9
11
18.3%
Point
31
0.8
3
9.7%
Outer slot
19
1.4
3
15.8%
Left circle
11
0.4
0
0.0%
Right circle
8
0.3
1
12.5%
Below goal line
2
0.4
1
50.0%
Hover or focus a row to light up those attempts on the rink.
Finishing evidence. Scoring 13.3% on chances vs 9.8% expected (+3.6 points), led by point volume and wrist finishing.
Shot types195 attempts
Wrist66%
Snap12%
Backhand8%
Slap8%
Tip-in4%
Deflected3%
High-danger chances
Expected
10.8
Goals
15
Conversion
18.5%
Model 13.3%
81 high-danger attempts · Model is the expected conversion on those attempts.
Recent form
Loading recent games…
Season vs reference
Loading season comparison…
Loading playoff games…
Loading game log…
Loading career ledger…
Every metric name opens its definition; the full list lives in Metrics.
Traditional statistics cover all situations. Supporting five-on-five analyses use completed games, raw adjustment and exposure from xG model v4. The two samples can differ.
An em dash means unavailable, not zero. A partial season remains partial. Where a panel reports evidence coverage, its rates use only the covered games. History never substitutes a different model, and a missing appearance interrupts a rolling model window.
Shot maps use the same shot model as Game Center and show which model version scored recent shots beside the rink. Older seasons can use earlier model versions. High danger means a model scoring probability of at least 0.20 on an unblocked attempt; for goalies, medium danger is 0.08 to 0.20 and low is below 0.08.
Special-team buckets include the wider recorded man-advantage and man-down states, read from the player’s own team; for a goalie, penalty kill means facing a power play. Their ranks need 100 recorded minutes and at least 30 qualified peers; below 100 minutes, penalty-kill percentiles are provisional. Playoff values have no ranks or percentiles. Team share is player ice time divided by team ice time in that situation, over the games the player dressed. Zone starts describe faceoff-started five-on-five shifts and exclude on-the-fly starts.
Penalties count events, including one for a double minor; bench and served-by roles are excluded, and victimless infractions have no drawn role. EPV added sums changes in the probability that the possessing team scores next; it is not standings points or an isolated player grade. Rolling windows never cross seasons or season types, and a missed game is not a zero-performance appearance. Career rates use summed counts and exposure, never an average of season rates; a missing contributing season withholds its career metric, and Performance begins in 2023–24.
Very good: 0.79 individual expected goals per 60 (48th of 197)
Very good: 0.79 individual expected goals per 60 (48th of 197)
Below average: 46.9% on-ice expected goal share at five-on-five (148th of 197)
Below average: 46.9% on-ice expected goal share at five-on-five (148th of 197)
Poor: 3.01 on-ice expected goals against per 60 (186th of 197)
Poor: 3.01 on-ice expected goals against per 60 (186th of 197)
Defensive metrics
Five-on-five on-ice suppression; individual events in all situations.
Suppression & events
Player
Percentile
Rank
66.36
195 / 197
—
—
—
0.060
105 / 197
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Player value: 66.36 Peer range: 43.34 – 69.13 / 60
MeanRyan Dzingel
Lower (better)Higher
Player 66.36 · mean 56.46. Lower raw values are better.
On-ice attempts against per 60, including blocks.
Discipline & puck management
Recorded season event counts · all situations
Penaltiesnet —
Taken —Drawn —
Puck eventsnet —
Giveaways —Takeaways —
Blocks
—
all situations
Hits
—
all situations
Above average: 4.80 power-play points per 60 (37th of 108)
Above average: 4.80 power-play points per 60 (37th of 108)
Power play
137:23 recorded ice time · peers need 100 minutes
Share of team PP
—
in games dressed
PP points
11
goals + assists
Unit xGF / 60
4.58
team without: —
Power play rates
Player
Percentile
Rank
4.80
37 / 108
—
—
—
8.73
63 / 108
1.23
66 / 108
4.58
104 / 108
—
—
—
Player value: 4.80 Peer range: 0.92 – 8.04 / 60
MeanRyan Dzingel
Lower Higher (better)
Player 4.80 · mean 4.17. Higher raw values rank higher.
Recorded goals plus assists per 60 in this scope; widened power-play and penalty-kill scopes.
Penalty kill
1:03 recorded ice time · peers need 100 minutes
Share of team PK
—
in games dressed
SH points
0
goals + assists
Unit xGA / 60
13.42
team without: —
Penalty kill rates
Player
Percentile*
Rank
13.42
—
—
—
—
171.43
—
—
—
—
0.00
—
* Provisional: under 100 PK minutes
Player value: 13.42 Peer range: 4.64 – 13.42 / 60
MeanRyan Dzingel
Lower (better)Higher
Player 13.42 · mean 6.60. Lower raw values are better. Provisional PK percentile: under 100 recorded minutes. Smaller samples are less reliable; official ranks need 100 minutes.
Raw on-ice expected goals against per 60; the Season metrics sample.
Provisional PK percentile: under 100 recorded minutes. Smaller samples are less reliable; official ranks need 100 minutes.
16:49 TOI per game (14:22 at five-on-five · 1:46 PP · 0:01 PK)
16:49 TOI per game (14:22 at five-on-five · 1:46 PP · 0:01 PK)
Results vs expected
Five-on-five · what happened beside the chances created and allowed
On-ice results
Player
Percentile
Rank
—
—
—
2.66
65 / 197
—
—
—
3.01
186 / 197
—
—
—
46.9
148 / 197
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Complete recorded inputs are unavailable.
5v5 goals
—
for–against
5v5 expected
49.8–56.3
xG for–against
EPV added
+0.62
21 attributed games · all situations
On ice vs off ice
Team share with Ryan Dzingel on the ice against the same team without him.
Share
On ice and off ice
On-minus-off gap in percentage points
xGF%
On ice 46.9% · Off ice unavailable
—
CF%
On ice 44.8% · Off ice unavailable
—
GF%
On ice unavailable · Off ice unavailable
—
On iceOff ice
Scale 40–65% · marker at 50% · right column is the on-minus-off gap in points
6 points over the last 10 games
6 points over the last 10 games
78 games · most recent at OTT, W 6–2: 0 G, 0 A
78 games · most recent at OTT, W 6–2: 0 G, 0 A
Official totals; expected-goal columns are five-on-five.
Shading: peer percentile that season. Bold: career high.
Season metrics
2018–19 · five-on-five · against qualified peers
Production
Player
Percentile
Rank
2.09
33 / 197
1.07
14 / 197
—
—
—
Shooting & finishing
Player
Percentile
Rank
0.79
48 / 197
7.01
75 / 197
11.02
100 / 197
0.091
18 / 164
0.28
15 / 164
Above averageNear averageBelow averageBars and shaded cells show peer percentile, so more is always better · tick at the 50th
Player value: 2.09 Peer range: 0.42 – 2.92 / 60
MeanRyan Dzingel
Lower Higher (better)
Player 2.09 · mean 1.58. Higher raw values rank higher.
Recorded five-on-five goals plus assists per 60 minutes.
How to read these comparisons
Player values are recorded season results. Peer averages are arithmetic means of qualified players in the selected group; each row uses the same peers for its average and rank. Ranks use unrounded values, with tied players sharing a rank and the next rank skipped. Lower xG against ranks better. Green/red differences show favorable/unfavorable values versus average, not isolated player impact. Brass marks top-ten ranks.
Goals above expected is the raw goals-minus-xG rate, without the shrinkage used in the older finishing comparison. On-ice measures include teammates, opponents and deployment. These recorded metrics describe different quantities from the adjusted Season score components beside them.
Skaters need 20 appearances and 300 five-on-five minutes; quality and finishing also need 75 unblocked attempts. Early in a season these minimums scale down with games played so far. At least 30 peers must qualify. Playoff ranks are withheld. A reviewed axis whose own evidence fails is withheld and shown with its reason rather than ranked. These workload rules do not express statistical confidence.
Position uses the NHL listed primary position available now; it does not establish historical position or actual deployment. Broad groups are forwards, defence and goalies. This version uses the current model’s covered games only.
Recent form
Trailing ten appearances. Shaded games have fewer than ten in the window.
Trailing 10 games · Points / gamePoints in each gameSeason points / game
0.60 P / GP
Apr 6, 2019@ OTT
Trailing 10 · Points / game
0.60
Points in this game
0
Season points / game
0.72
10 appearances in window10 with five-on-five model coverage
