Ondrej Palat

New York Islanders#81Left wing Shoots left

Age 35 · 6′0″ · 194 lb · Frydek-Mistek, CZE

No checked season results are available for this selection.

Games9

Goals20.22/GP▲0.16

Assists10.11/GP▼0.01

Points30.33/GP▲0.15

5v5 xG share62.2%7th of 49…

Career awards

No checked season results are available for this selection.

No complete checked component breakdown is available for this selection.

Loading season standing and profile…

Season metrics

2026–27 · five-on-five · vs 49 positional peers

Production	Player	Percentile	Rank
	1.69		26 / 4948th
	1.13		14 / 4973rd
	0.56		21 / 4958th

Shooting & finishing	Player	Percentile	Rank
	0.71		27 / 4946th
	5.63		28 / 4944th
	12.38		24 / 4952nd
	0.084		18 / 4864th
	0.42		13 / 4874th

Elite90+Strong70–89Average30–69Weak10–29Poor<10Bar length is the peer percentile, so longer is always better · tick at the 50th

How to read these comparisons

Player values are recorded season results. Peer averages are arithmetic means of qualified players in the selected group; each row uses the same peers for its average and rank. Ranks use unrounded values, with tied players sharing a rank and the next rank skipped. Lower xG against ranks better. Bar colours are the five performance tiers; context rows are blue and not graded. Differences from the average describe the season, not isolated player impact.

Goals above expected is the raw goals-minus-xG rate, without the shrinkage used in the older finishing comparison. On-ice measures include teammates, opponents and deployment. These recorded metrics describe different quantities from the adjusted Season score components beside them.

Skaters need 20 appearances and 300 five-on-five minutes; quality and finishing also need 75 unblocked attempts. Early in a season these minimums scale down with games played so far. At least 30 peers must qualify. Playoff ranks are withheld. A reviewed axis whose own evidence fails is withheld and shown with its reason rather than ranked. These workload rules do not express statistical confidence.

Position uses the NHL listed primary position available now; it does not establish historical position or actual deployment. Broad groups are forwards, defence and goalies. This version uses the current model’s covered games only.

Season vs reference

Reference

Per game · all situations

Metric2026–27ReferenceDiff

0.220.06+0.16

0.110.13-0.01

0.330.19+0.15

1.111.04+0.07

Reference: 2025–26 · 80 games.

Season comparisons

Loading peer comparisons and model evidence…

Optional recent-history profile

Rolling Radar

Recent NHL history, carried across seasons. The radar compares this broader profile with a fixed position-group reference.

Rolling profile is currently unavailable.

Rolling Radar

Loading recent-history profile…

Results vs expected

Five-on-five · what happened beside the chances created and allowed

Chances	Player	Percentile	Rank
	2.53		33 / 4933rd
	1.54		1 / 4999th
	62.2		7 / 4988th

Player	Percentile	Rank
—	—	—
—	—	—
—	—	—

Player	Percentile	Rank
—	—	—
—	—	—
—	—	—

Context · not graded

5v5 goals: —
5v5 expected: 4.5–2.7
EPV added: —

On ice vs off ice

New York's share with Ondrej Palat on the ice against the same team without him.

Share	On ice and off ice	On-minus-off gap in percentage points
xGF%	On ice 62.2%; off ice 51.4%.	+10.8
CF%	On ice 61.9%; off ice 48.6%.	+13.3
GF%	On ice unavailable · Off ice unavailable	—

On iceOff ice

Scale 40–65% · marker at 50% · right column is the on-minus-off gap in points

Loading model evidence…

Defensive metrics

Five-on-five on-ice suppression; individual events in all situations.

Player	Percentile	Rank
40.51		2 / 4998th
—	—	—
0.054		5 / 4992nd

Puck management	Player	Percentile	Rank
	1.53		8 / 4985th
	0.51		1 / 4999th
	0.00		T-23 / 4954th

Physical style	Player	Percentile	Rank
	3.57		1 / 4999th
	9.17		11 / 4979th

Context · not graded

Evidence coverage: high danger 8 of 9 games.

Discipline & puck management

Recorded season event counts · all situations

Penaltiesnet 0

Taken 1Drawn 1

Puck eventsnet +2

Giveaways 1Takeaways 3

Blocks: 7
Hits: 18

Loading defensive evidence…

SituationChancesViewShot type

Shot map

All 15 attempts

Goal2Shot on goal8Missed shot5Blocked shot0Larger dot = higher xG

Shooting by zone

Hover a row to light it up · click to pin

Zone	Att	G	xG	Goal rate	Exp.	G−xG
Inner slot	7	2	0.7	28.6%	10.1%	+1.3
Point	1	0	0.0	0.0%	1.0%	0.0
Right circle	1	0	0.0	0.0%	1.1%	0.0
Outer slot	1	0	0.0	0.0%	4.8%	0.0
High slot	5	0	0.5	0.0%	9.5%	−0.5
All zones	15	2	1.3	13.3%	8.4%	+0.7

Finishing evidence. Scoring 13.3% on chances vs 8.4% expected (+5.0 points), led by inner slot volume and wrist finishing.

Sorted by goals minus expected goals. Goal rate is goals per unblocked attempt against the expected rate.

Shot profile

Context · not graded

On-net rate: 66.7%
Slot share: 80.0%
Average distance: 22.0 ft
Rebound attempts / 60: 1.02

Shot types

15 attempts

Type	Share	Sh%	G−xG
Wrist	53.3%	16.7%	+0.4
Tip-in	26.7%	0.0%	−0.3
Snap	13.3%	50.0%	+0.6
Poke	6.7%	—	−0.1

Share is context, not a grade. Sh% counts shots on goal only.

High-danger chances

Model goal probability ≥ 0.20

Conversion100.0%+77.6 pts vs expected

Actual100.0%

Expected22.4%

Attempts: 1
Goals: 1
Expected goals: 0.2
G−xG: +0.8

Shot locations

Loading canonical shot events…

Usage by situation

Ice time, share of team ice time, scoring and scoring rate, with where shifts start.

Scope	TOI/GP	Team share	G	A	P	P/60
Five-on-five	11:51	25.2%	2	1	3	1.69
Power play	0:06	2.0%	0	0	0	0.00
Penalty kill	1:01	15.5%	0	0	0	0.00
Other	0:07	—	0	0	0	0.00
All situations	13:05	21.6%	2	1	3	1.53

Where the 3 points come from · All situations

Goals2 · 1.02/60
Primary assists1 · 0.51/60
Secondary assists0 · 0.00/60

0.0% of points are secondary assists. Peer average 27.5%. Primary points per 60 (1.53).

Zone starts 62.1% offensive of OZ + DZ · 65th percentile

Offensive 36.0%Neutral 42.0%Defensive 22.0%

Shifts

17.8 a game · 0:44 average

Zone starts: five-on-five · Shifts: all situations

Usage by situation

Loading usage…

Power play

0:56 recorded ice time · peers need 100 minutes

Share of team PP: 2.0%
PP points: 0
Unit xGF / 60: 8.21

Power play rates	Player	Percentile	Rank
	0.00		—
	0.00		—
	0.00		—
	0.00		—
	8.21		—
	0.00		—

No rank yet

Penalty kill

9:05 recorded ice time · peers need 100 minutes

Share of team PK: 15.5%
SH points: 0
Unit xGA / 60: 6.90

Penalty kill rates	Player	Percentile	Rank
	6.90		—
	13.21		—
	118.90		—
	0.00		—
	0.00		—

No rank yet

Loading special teams…

Split	GP	G	A	P	P/GP	5v5 xG share	Team record
Venue
Home	5	2	1	3	0.60	54.6%	4–1–0
Away	4	0	0	0	0.00	76.7%	1–2–1
Rest
1 day of rest	4	0	1	1	0.25	78.0%	2–1–1
2+ days of rest	4	2	0	2	0.50	50.5%	3–1–0
Opponent
vs Eastern	6	1	1	2	0.33	69.3%	2–3–1
vs Western	3	1	0	1	0.33	49.7%	3–0–0
vs playoff teams	5	0	1	1	0.20	77.5%	1–3–1
vs non-playoff teams	4	2	0	2	0.50	49.4%	4–0–0
Recent
Last 10	9	2	1	3	0.33	62.2%	5–3–1

Split	G	A	P	5v5 xG share	5v5 CF%	5v5 GF–GA
Period
1st period	1	0	1	—	—	—
2nd period	0	1	1	—	—	—
3rd period	1	0	1	—	—	—
Score state · 5v5 on ice
Leading	—	—	—	56.1%	64.0%	2–0
Tied	—	—	—	65.8%	65.2%	1–1
Trailing	—	—	—	72.5%	51.4%	2–1

Teammate	Pos	TOI together	xG share together	GF–GA	CF%	Him without	Teammate without
Casey Cizikas	C	48:01	64.4%	1–0	60.2%	60.0%	58.5%
Jean-Gabriel Pageau	C	46:28	60.1%	4–2	63.7%	63.8%	32.6%
Anthony Duclair	L	42:28	65.5%	4–2	62.7%	59.3%	36.4%
Ryan Pulock	D	39:18	50.9%	1–1	52.0%	70.6%	40.1%
Matthew Schaefer	D	38:05	67.7%	3–1	70.1%	58.3%	51.7%
Adam Pelech	D	37:12	51.5%	1–0	58.1%	66.5%	57.0%
Logan Stanley	D	32:36	78.7%	2–1	74.5%	56.8%	53.7%
Matias Maccelli	L	31:32	61.5%	1–0	51.9%	62.4%	44.9%
Tony DeAngelo	D	31:12	65.5%	2–0	62.5%	60.8%	51.4%
Alexander Romanov	D	13:40	60.7%	0–1	51.6%	62.6%	32.5%
Matthew Kessel	D	10:45	67.2%	0–0	76.2%	61.8%	66.1%
Scott Mayfield	D	8:48	73.3%	1–0	46.7%	61.5%	55.9%

Season	GP	G	A	P	SOG	P/GP	5v5 ixG/60	5v5 GP
2024–25	5	0	2	2	5	0.40	0.26	5
2022–23	12	3	4	7	16	0.58	0.41	12
2021–22	23	11	10	21	49	0.91	1.11	23
2020–21	22	5	8	13	41	0.59	0.82	22
2019–20	25	11	7	18	80	0.72	1.09	25
2018–19	4	1	0	1	4	0.25	0.47	4
2017–18	17	6	6	12	31	0.71	0.91	17
2015–16	17	4	6	10	34	0.59	0.61	17

	Opponent	Result		G	A		+/−	SOG		5v5 on-ice xG share	Game
Oct 20	vs ANA	W 3–2	14:47	1	0	1	1	1	0.20	45.2%	View →
Oct 17	@ TOR	W 4–1	13:02	0	0	0	0	0	0.07	75.5%	View →
Oct 15	@ OTT	OTL 1–2 SO	13:37	0	0	0	0	2	0.12	85.9%	View →
Oct 13	vs VAN	W 3–2	13:44	0	0	0	0	0	0.00	30.2%	View →
Oct 10	vs TBL	L 3–5	15:29	0	1	1	1	0	0.07	80.1%	View →
Oct 8	vs CHI	W 4–1	12:35	0	0	0	1	0	0.00	71.4%	View →
Oct 6	@ NYR	L 2–5	11:57	0	0	0	-1	1	0.28	81.7%	View →
Oct 3	vs NJD	W 6–0	12:27	1	0	1	1	4	0.44	48.7%	View →
Sep 30	@ TOR	L 1–2	10:06	0	0	0	0	2	0.08	66.1%	View →
Filtered 9	—	5–3–1	13:05 avg	2	1	3	3	10	1.25	62.2%	—

Season	Box score · all situations	5v5 individual	5v5 on ice	Season performance
2026–27	35	NYI	9	2	1	3	3	2	10	20.0	0	13:05	18	7	1.69	0.71	5.63	0.084	2.53	1.54	62.2	61.9	—	—	—	—
2025–26	34	NJD, NYI	80	5	10	15	-11	14	83	6.0	1	12:49	—	—	0.72	0.60	4.82	0.078	2.36	2.47	48.8	49.1	—	—	—	—
2024–25	33	NJD	77	15	13	28	-5	12	96	15.6	2	13:45	—	—	—	—	—	0.087	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
2023–24	32	NJD	71	11	20	31	-9	37	108	10.2	1	15:39	—	—	1.61	0.68	5.99	0.080	2.95	2.44	54.7	54.8	—	—	—	—
2022–23	31	NJD	49	8	15	23	5	6	79	10.1	1	15:32	—	—	1.64	0.74	5.92	0.088	3.43	2.28	60.0	54.1	—	—	—	—
2021–22	30	TBL	77	18	31	49	15	20	143	12.6	1	16:30	—	—	1.94	0.93	6.71	0.099	3.49	2.76	55.8	50.8	—	—	—	—
2020–21	29	TBL	55	15	31	46	1	26	111	13.5	7	17:27	—	—	1.88	0.67	6.78	0.078	2.67	2.19	55.0	52.3	—	—	—	—
2019–20	28	TBL	69	17	24	41	25	22	128	13.3	4	16:11	—	—	2.10	0.73	6.83	0.079	2.72	2.07	56.8	53.8	—	—	—	—
2018–19	27	TBL	64	8	26	34	4	20	100	8.0	2	14:53	—	—	1.82	0.65	6.53	0.075	2.65	2.65	50.0	51.2	—	—	—	—
2017–18	26	TBL	56	11	24	35	16	6	109	10.1	4	17:00	—	—	1.89	0.79	7.07	0.081	3.03	2.36	56.2	51.3	—	—	—	—
2016–17	25	TBL	75	17	35	52	8	39	162	10.5	5	19:07	—	—	1.85	0.73	7.04	0.078	2.60	2.40	52.0	52.9	—	—	—	—
2015–16	24	TBL	62	16	24	40	10	20	117	13.7	1	17:55	—	—	1.95	0.66	6.60	0.072	2.55	2.47	50.9	51.6	—	—	—	—
Career	—	12 seasons	744	143	254	397	62	224	1246	11.5	29	15:57	—	—	—	—	—	0.082	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—

2 award records

Stanley Cup · 2020–21
Stanley Cup · 2019–20

Every metric name opens its definition; the full list lives in Metrics.

Traditional statistics cover all situations. Supporting five-on-five analyses use completed games, raw adjustment and exposure from xG model v4. The two samples can differ.

An em dash means unavailable, not zero. A partial season remains partial. Where a panel reports evidence coverage, its rates use only the covered games. History never substitutes a different model, and a missing appearance interrupts a rolling model window.

Shot maps use the same shot model as Game Center and show which model version scored recent shots beside the rink. Older seasons can use earlier model versions. High danger means a model scoring probability of at least 0.20 on an unblocked attempt; for goalies, medium danger is 0.08 to 0.20 and low is below 0.08.

Special-team buckets include the wider recorded man-advantage and man-down states, read from the player’s own team; for a goalie, penalty kill means facing a power play. Their ranks need 100 recorded minutes and at least 30 qualified peers; below 100 minutes, penalty-kill percentiles are provisional. Playoff values have no ranks or percentiles. Team share is player ice time divided by team ice time in that situation, over the games the player dressed. Zone starts describe faceoff-started five-on-five shifts and exclude on-the-fly starts.

Penalties count events, including one for a double minor; bench and served-by roles are excluded, and victimless infractions have no drawn role. EPV added sums changes in the probability that the possessing team scores next; it is not standings points or an isolated player grade. Rolling windows never cross seasons or season types, and a missed game is not a zero-performance appearance. Career rates use summed counts and exposure, never an average of season rates; a missing contributing season withholds its career metric, and Performance begins in 2023–24.

Explore the full methodology →

Season			Box score · all situations												5v5 individual				5v5 on ice					Season performance
Season	Age	Team	GP	G	A	P	+/−	PIM	SOG	Sh%	PPG	TOI/GP	Hits	Blk	P/60	ixG/60	SOG/60	xG/UA	xGF/60	xGA/60	xGF%	CF%	GF%	Perf/60	Grade	Rank
2026–27	35	NYI	9	2	1	3	3	2	10	20.0	0	13:05	18	7	1.69	0.71	5.63	0.084	2.53	1.54	62.2	61.9	—	—	—	—
2025–26	34	NJD, NYI	80	5	10	15	-11	14	83	6.0	1	12:49	—	—	0.72	0.60	4.82	0.078	2.36	2.47	48.8	49.1	—	—	—	—
2024–25	33	NJD	77	15	13	28	-5	12	96	15.6	2	13:45	—	—	—	—	—	0.087	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
2023–24	32	NJD	71	11	20	31	-9	37	108	10.2	1	15:39	—	—	1.61	0.68	5.99	0.080	2.95	2.44	54.7	54.8	—	—	—	—
2022–23	31	NJD	49	8	15	23	5	6	79	10.1	1	15:32	—	—	1.64	0.74	5.92	0.088	3.43	2.28	60.0	54.1	—	—	—	—
2021–22	30	TBL	77	18	31	49	15	20	143	12.6	1	16:30	—	—	1.94	0.93	6.71	0.099	3.49	2.76	55.8	50.8	—	—	—	—
2020–21	29	TBL	55	15	31	46	1	26	111	13.5	7	17:27	—	—	1.88	0.67	6.78	0.078	2.67	2.19	55.0	52.3	—	—	—	—
2019–20	28	TBL	69	17	24	41	25	22	128	13.3	4	16:11	—	—	2.10	0.73	6.83	0.079	2.72	2.07	56.8	53.8	—	—	—	—
2018–19	27	TBL	64	8	26	34	4	20	100	8.0	2	14:53	—	—	1.82	0.65	6.53	0.075	2.65	2.65	50.0	51.2	—	—	—	—
2017–18	26	TBL	56	11	24	35	16	6	109	10.1	4	17:00	—	—	1.89	0.79	7.07	0.081	3.03	2.36	56.2	51.3	—	—	—	—
2016–17	25	TBL	75	17	35	52	8	39	162	10.5	5	19:07	—	—	1.85	0.73	7.04	0.078	2.60	2.40	52.0	52.9	—	—	—	—
2015–16	24	TBL	62	16	24	40	10	20	117	13.7	1	17:55	—	—	1.95	0.66	6.60	0.072	2.55	2.47	50.9	51.6	—	—	—	—
Career	—	12 seasons	744	143	254	397	62	224	1246	11.5	29	15:57	—	—	—	—	—	0.082	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—

Ondrej Palat

Season performanceSelected-season standing and the components behind the scoreCollapse

Season metrics

Season vs reference

Season comparisons

Rolling Radar

Rolling Radar

On-ice impact5v5Strong 62.2% on-ice expected goal share at five-on-five (7th of 49)What the team creates and allows during the player’s five-on-five minutesExplore

Results vs expected

On ice vs off ice

Defense5v5 · AllElite 1.54 on-ice expected goals against per 60 (1st of 49)On-ice suppression and individual disciplineExplore

Defensive metrics

Discipline & puck management

Penaltiesnet 0

Puck eventsnet +2

Shooting & finishingAverage 0.71 individual expected goals per 60 (27th of 49)Where the player shoots, the quality of those chances, and actual versus expected goalsExplore

Shot map

Shooting by zone

Shot profile

Shot types

High-danger chances

Shot locations

Usage & deployment13:05 TOI per game (11:51 at five-on-five · 0:06 PP · 1:01 PK)Scoring by situation, zone starts and workloadExplore

Usage by situation

Where the 3 points come from · All situations

Zone starts 62.1% offensive of OZ + DZ · 65th percentile

Shifts

Usage by situation

Special teamsPP · PK0.00 power-play points per 60Power play and penalty killExplore

Power play

Penalty kill

FormExplore

Rolling Radar

Splits0.60 points per game at home · 0.00 awayVenue, rest and opponentExplore

By period and score state

Linemates5v5Most often with Casey Cizikas: 48 five-on-five minutes, 64.4% xG share togetherWho he plays with at five-on-fiveExplore

PlayoffsNo playoff games yet this season · 125 career playoff gamesExplore

Every playoff run

Game log9 games · most recent vs ANA, W 3–2: 1 G, 0 AOfficial totals and five-on-five evidenceExplore

Career12 NHL seasons: 744 games, 397 pointsEvery season and a recomputed career lineExplore

Data notesScopes, missing values and model evidenceExplore

Every playoff run

Defensive metrics

Discipline & puck management

Penaltiesnet 0

Puck eventsnet +2

Power play

Penalty kill

Results vs expected

On ice vs off ice

Shot map

Shooting by zone

Shot profile

Shot types

High-danger chances

Usage by situation

Where the 3 points come from · All situations

Zone starts 62.1% offensive of OZ + DZ · 65th percentile

Shifts

By period and score state

Season metrics

Season vs reference