Garnet Hathaway — 2019–20 stats and season rank | IceSheet
Garnet Hathaway
Florida Panthers·#21·Right wing · Shoots right
Age 34 · 6′2″ · 212 lb · Naples, Florida, USA
No checked season results are available for this selection.
Games66T-219th in NHL
Goals90.14/GP▼0.01T-248th in NHL
Assists70.11/GP0.00T-465th in NHL
Points160.24/GP…
5v5 xG share…
Avg TOI10:47…
/
Loading season standing and profile…
Season comparisons
Loading peer comparisons and model evidence…
Optional recent-history profile
Rolling Radar
Loading recent-history profile…
Loading model evidence…
Loading defensive evidence…
Shot locations
Loading canonical shot events…
Usage by situation
Loading usage…
Loading special teams…
T-394th in NHL
57.2%7th of 82
T-728th in NHL
No checked season results are available for this selection.
No complete checked component breakdown is available for this selection.
Rolling Radar
Recent NHL history, carried across seasons. The radar compares this broader profile with a fixed position-group reference.
Rolling profile is currently unavailable.
Elite 57.2% on-ice expected goal share at five-on-five (7th of 82)
Elite 57.2% on-ice expected goal share at five-on-five (7th of 82)
Elite 1.90 on-ice expected goals against per 60 (2nd of 82)
Elite 1.90 on-ice expected goals against per 60 (2nd of 82)
Defensive metrics
Five-on-five on-ice suppression; individual events in all situations.
Suppression
Player
Percentile
Rank
49.72
19 / 8278th
—
—
—
0.053
8 / 8291st
Puck management
Player
Percentile
Rank
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Physical style
Player
Percentile
Rank
—
—
—
—
—
—
Context · not graded
Player value: 49.72 Peer range: 44.69 – 66.32 / 60
MeanGarnet Hathaway
Lower (better)Higher
Player 49.72 · mean 53.27. Lower raw values are better.
On-ice attempts against per 60, including blocks.
Evidence coverage: high danger 20 of 66 games.
Discipline & puck management
Recorded season event counts · all situations
Penaltiesnet —
Taken —Drawn —
Puck eventsnet —
Giveaways —Takeaways —
Blocks
—
all situations
Hits
—
all situations
Both penalty counts cover 27 of 66 games with every drawn role recorded.
Strong 0.92 individual expected goals per 60 (21st of 82)
Strong 0.92 individual expected goals per 60 (21st of 82)
10:47 TOI per game (9:21 at five-on-five · 0:03 PP · 1:18 PK)
10:47 TOI per game (9:21 at five-on-five · 0:03 PP · 1:18 PK)
0.00 power-play points per 60
0.00 power-play points per 60
Power play
2:53 recorded ice time · peers need 100 minutes
Share of team PP
—
in games dressed
PP points
0
goals + assists
Unit xGF / 60
4.36
team without: —
Power play rates
Player
Percentile
Rank
0.00
—
—
—
—
0.00
—
0.00
—
4.36
—
—
—
—
No rank yet
Player value: 0.00 Peer range: 0.00 – 8.10 / 60
MeanGarnet Hathaway
Lower Higher (better)
Player 0.00 · mean 3.91. Higher raw values rank higher. Needs 100 minutes in this special-teams scope.
Recorded goals plus assists per 60 in this scope; widened power-play and penalty-kill scopes.
Needs 100 minutes in this special-teams scope.
Evidence coverage: goals 1 of 13 games · team time 25 of 66 games.
Penalty kill
86:15 recorded ice time · peers need 100 minutes
Share of team PK
—
in games dressed
SH points
1
goals + assists
Unit xGA / 60
2.45
team without: —
Penalty kill rates
Player
Percentile
Rank
2.45
—
—
—
—
64.00
—
—
—
—
0.67
—
No rank yet
Player value: 2.45 Peer range: 2.45 – 7.69 / 60
MeanGarnet Hathaway
Lower (better)Higher
Player 2.45 · mean 6.36. Lower raw values are better. Fewer than 30 qualified peers.
Raw on-ice expected goals against per 60; the Season metrics sample.
Fewer than 30 qualified peers.
Evidence coverage: goals 12 of 59 games · high danger 13 of 59 games · team time 25 of 66 games.
Season metrics
2019–20 · five-on-five · vs 82 positional peers
Production
Player
Percentile
Rank
1.36
58 / 8230th
0.78
35 / 8258th
—
—
—
Shooting & finishing
Player
Percentile
Rank
0.92
21 / 8275th
7.30
45 / 8246th
12.65
37 / 8256th
0.094
5 / 7595th
-0.14
53 / 7530th
Elite90+Strong70–89Average30–69Weak10–29Poor<10Bar length is the peer percentile, so longer is always better · tick at the 50th
Player value: 1.36 Peer range: 0.56 – 3.02 / 60
MeanGarnet Hathaway
Lower Higher (better)
Player 1.36 · mean 1.71. Higher raw values rank higher.
Recorded five-on-five goals plus assists per 60 minutes.
How to read these comparisons
Player values are recorded season results. Peer averages are arithmetic means of qualified players in the selected group; each row uses the same peers for its average and rank. Ranks use unrounded values, with tied players sharing a rank and the next rank skipped. Lower xG against ranks better. Bar colours are the five performance tiers; context rows are blue and not graded. Differences from the average describe the season, not isolated player impact.
Goals above expected is the raw goals-minus-xG rate, without the shrinkage used in the older finishing comparison. On-ice measures include teammates, opponents and deployment. These recorded metrics describe different quantities from the adjusted Season score components beside them.
Skaters need 20 appearances and 300 five-on-five minutes; quality and finishing also need 75 unblocked attempts. Early in a season these minimums scale down with games played so far. At least 30 peers must qualify. Playoff ranks are withheld. A reviewed axis whose own evidence fails is withheld and shown with its reason rather than ranked. These workload rules do not express statistical confidence.
Position uses the NHL listed primary position available now; it does not establish historical position or actual deployment. Broad groups are forwards, defence and goalies. This version uses the current model’s covered games only.
Season vs reference
Per game · all situations
Metric2019–20ReferenceDiff
0.140.14-0.01
0.110.11+0.00
0.240.25-0.01
1.211.01+0.20
Reference: 2018–19 · 76 games.
Shot map
All 108 attempts
Garnet Hathaway
108 attempts9.94 xG9 G
Goal9Shot on goal71Missed shot28Blocked shot0Larger dot = higher xG
Shooting by zone
Hover a row to light it up · click to pin
Zone
Att
G
xG
Goal rate
Exp.
Goals vs expected
G−xG
Inner slot
43
7
5.5
16.3%
12.8%
+1.5
Point
6
1
0.1
16.7%
2.4%
+0.9
Left circle
2
0
0.0
0.0%
1.8%
0.0
Right circle
9
0
0.2
0.0%
2.0%
−0.2
Outer slot
8
0
0.4
0.0%
4.7%
−0.4
High slot
40
1
3.7
2.5%
9.2%
−2.7
All zones
108
9
9.9
8.3%
9.2%
−0.9
Finishing evidence. Scoring 8.3% on chances vs 9.2% expected (−0.9 points), with the largest shortfall in the high slot.
Sorted by goals minus expected goals. Goal rate is goals per unblocked attempt against the expected rate.
Shot profile
Context · not graded
On-net rate
74.1%
80 of 108 attempts on goal
Slot share
76.9%
83 from the inner or high slot
Average distance
21.9 ft
from the centre of the net
Rebound attempts / 60
0.59
7 this season · all situations
Shot types
108 attempts
Type
Share
Sh%
G−xG
Wrist
50.0%
15.0%
+1.0
Tip-in
16.7%
8.3%
−0.3
Backhand
13.9%
7.7%
−1.0
Snap
12.0%
0.0%
−1.2
Slap
5.6%
33.3%
+0.7
Deflected
0.9%
0.0%
0.0
Other
0.9%
—
−0.1
Share is context, not a grade. Sh% counts shots on goal only.
High-danger chances
Model goal probability ≥ 0.20
Conversion0.0%−27.8 pts vs expected
Actual0.0%
Expected27.8%
Attempts
3
2.8% of these attempts
Goals
0
0% of all goals
Expected goals
0.8
0.28 xG per attempt
G−xG
−0.8
below model
Usage by situation
Ice time, share of team ice time, scoring and scoring rate, with where shifts start.
Scope
TOI/GP
Team share
G
A
P
P/60
Five-on-five
9:21
—
8
6
14
1.36
Power play
0:03
—
0
0
0
0.00
Penalty kill
1:18
—
0
1
1
0.70
Other
0:05
—
1
0
1
10.81
All situations
10:47
—
9
7
16
1.35
Where the 16 points come from · All situations
Goals9 · 0.76/60
Primary assists— · —/60
Secondary assists— · —/60
Zone starts — offensive of OZ + DZ
Offensive —Neutral —Defensive —
Shifts
— a game · — average
Zone starts: five-on-five · Shifts: all situations
Recent scoring against his own season
Recent scoring against his own season
Loading recent games…
Loading splits…
Loading linemates…
Loading playoff games…
Loading game log…
Loading career ledger…
Every metric name opens its definition; the full list lives in Metrics.
Traditional statistics cover all situations. Supporting five-on-five analyses use completed games, raw adjustment and exposure from xG model v4. The two samples can differ.
An em dash means unavailable, not zero. A partial season remains partial. Where a panel reports evidence coverage, its rates use only the covered games. History never substitutes a different model, and a missing appearance interrupts a rolling model window.
Shot maps use the same shot model as Game Center and show which model version scored recent shots beside the rink. Older seasons can use earlier model versions. High danger means a model scoring probability of at least 0.20 on an unblocked attempt; for goalies, medium danger is 0.08 to 0.20 and low is below 0.08.
Special-team buckets include the wider recorded man-advantage and man-down states, read from the player’s own team; for a goalie, penalty kill means facing a power play. Their ranks need 100 recorded minutes and at least 30 qualified peers; below 100 minutes, penalty-kill percentiles are provisional. Playoff values have no ranks or percentiles. Team share is player ice time divided by team ice time in that situation, over the games the player dressed. Zone starts describe faceoff-started five-on-five shifts and exclude on-the-fly starts.
Penalties count events, including one for a double minor; bench and served-by roles are excluded, and victimless infractions have no drawn role. EPV added sums changes in the probability that the possessing team scores next; it is not standings points or an isolated player grade. Rolling windows never cross seasons or season types, and a missed game is not a zero-performance appearance. Career rates use summed counts and exposure, never an average of season rates; a missing contributing season withholds its career metric, and Performance begins in 2023–24.
Hot 4 points in the last 10 games (0.40 per game vs 0.24 this season)
Hot 4 points in the last 10 games (0.40 per game vs 0.24 this season)
0.19 points per game at home · 0.29 away
0.19 points per game at home · 0.29 away
Most often with Nic Dowd: 353 five-on-five minutes, 60.2% xG share together
Most often with Nic Dowd: 353 five-on-five minutes, 60.2% xG share together
Five-on-five · time together from shift charts (596:23 of his 5v5 ice time) · xG share together and apart
Teammate
Pos
TOI together
xG share together
GF–GA
CF%
Him without
Teammate without
Nic Dowd
C
352:40
60.2%
22–15
57.1%
52.9%
34.7%
Brendan Leipsic
L
325:35
57.7%
19–14
57.5%
56.3%
44.2%
Nick Jensen
D
206:47
54.7%
11–9
54.6%
58.1%
51.4%
Radko Gudas
D
190:47
52.9%
14–7
49.3%
58.9%
48.5%
Dmitry Orlov
D
187:06
58.3%
9–8
52.7%
56.4%
55.1%
Jonas Siegenthaler
D
180:14
62.6%
14–8
54.6%
54.8%
47.9%
Michal Kempny
D
178:55
55.9%
14–8
55.2%
57.6%
46.7%
John Carlson
D
176:26
59.7%
7–9
56.9%
55.6%
50.5%
Lars Eller
C
139:02
49.2%
11–7
46.4%
59.8%
52.2%
Carl Hagelin
L
87:35
56.0%
9–4
53.9%
57.2%
47.5%
Richard Panik
R
66:23
63.9%
4–5
55.1%
56.0%
46.3%
Jakub Vrana
L
60:39
52.2%
2–3
41.4%
57.7%
53.3%
Without columns are five-on-five xG share apart: him on the ice without that teammate, and the teammate without him (with this club). Bars are centred on an even 50%.
2019–20 playoffs
Official playoff totals · no peer ranks, since playoff samples are too small for a fair comparison
Games
8
10:10 per game
Goals
0
0 on the power play
Assists
0
official
Points
0
0 power-play points
Plus-minus
-3
even strength and shorthanded
Shots
5
0.0% shooting
Playoff games
Official totals; expected-goal columns are five-on-five.
