Alex Tuch

Washington Capitals#89Right wing Shoots right

Age 30 · 6′4″ · 219 lb · Syracuse, New York, USA

No checked season results are available for this selection.

Games74T-272nd in NHL

Goals200.27/GP▲0.08T-113th in NHL

Assists320.43/GP▲0.15T-107th in NHL

Points520.70/GP▲0.23T-102nd in NHL…

5v5 xG share54.2%16th of 102…

Avg TOI16:44319th in NHL…

No checked season results are available for this selection.

No complete checked component breakdown is available for this selection.

Loading season standing and profile…

Season metrics

2018–19 · five-on-five · vs 102 positional peers

Player	Percentile	Rank
2.48		7 / 10294th
0.83		37 / 10264th
—	—	—

Shooting & finishing	Player	Percentile	Rank
	0.78		39 / 10262nd
	8.40		28 / 10273rd
	15.55		18 / 10283rd
	0.069		56 / 8434th
	0.05		38 / 8455th

Elite90+Strong70–89Average30–69Weak10–29Poor<10Bar length is the peer percentile, so longer is always better · tick at the 50th

How to read these comparisons

Player values are recorded season results. Peer averages are arithmetic means of qualified players in the selected group; each row uses the same peers for its average and rank. Ranks use unrounded values, with tied players sharing a rank and the next rank skipped. Lower xG against ranks better. Bar colours are the five performance tiers; context rows are blue and not graded. Differences from the average describe the season, not isolated player impact.

Goals above expected is the raw goals-minus-xG rate, without the shrinkage used in the older finishing comparison. On-ice measures include teammates, opponents and deployment. These recorded metrics describe different quantities from the adjusted Season score components beside them.

Skaters need 20 appearances and 300 five-on-five minutes; quality and finishing also need 75 unblocked attempts. Early in a season these minimums scale down with games played so far. At least 30 peers must qualify. Playoff ranks are withheld. A reviewed axis whose own evidence fails is withheld and shown with its reason rather than ranked. These workload rules do not express statistical confidence.

Position uses the NHL listed primary position available now; it does not establish historical position or actual deployment. Broad groups are forwards, defence and goalies. This version uses the current model’s covered games only.

Season vs reference

Reference

Per game · all situations

Metric2018–19ReferenceDiff

0.270.19+0.08

0.430.28+0.15

0.700.47+0.23

2.432.19+0.24

Reference: 2017–18 · 78 games.

Season comparisons

Loading peer comparisons and model evidence…

Optional recent-history profile

Rolling Radar

Recent NHL history, carried across seasons. The radar compares this broader profile with a fixed position-group reference.

Rolling profile is currently unavailable.

Rolling Radar

Loading recent-history profile…

Results vs expected

Five-on-five · what happened beside the chances created and allowed

Chances	Player	Percentile	Rank
	2.97		17 / 10284th
	2.50		54 / 10248th
	54.2		16 / 10285th

Player	Percentile	Rank
—	—	—
—	—	—
—	—	—

Player	Percentile	Rank
—	—	—
—	—	—
—	—	—

Context · not graded

5v5 goals: —
5v5 expected: 50.2–42.4
EPV added: +6.04

On ice vs off ice

Vegas's share with Alex Tuch on the ice against the same team without him.

Share	On ice and off ice	On-minus-off gap in percentage points
xGF%	On ice 54.2% · Off ice unavailable	—
CF%	On ice 53.5% · Off ice unavailable	—
GF%	On ice unavailable · Off ice unavailable	—

On iceOff ice

Scale 40–65% · marker at 50% · right column is the on-minus-off gap in points

Loading model evidence…

Defensive metrics

Five-on-five on-ice suppression; individual events in all situations.

Player	Percentile	Rank
54.16		30 / 10271st
—	—	—
0.062		74 / 10228th

Player	Percentile	Rank
—	—	—
—	—	—
—	—	—

Physical style	Player	Percentile	Rank
	—	—	—
	—	—	—

Context · not graded

Evidence coverage: high danger 23 of 74 games.

Discipline & puck management

Recorded season event counts · all situations

Penaltiesnet —

Taken —Drawn —

Puck eventsnet —

Giveaways —Takeaways —

Blocks: —
Hits: —

Both penalty counts cover 26 of 74 games with every drawn role recorded.

Loading defensive evidence…

SituationChancesViewShot type

Shot map

All 250 attempts

Goal20Shot on goal160Missed shot70Blocked shot0Larger dot = higher xG

Shooting by zone

Hover a row to light it up · click to pin

Zone	Att	G	xG	Goal rate	Exp.	G−xG
Inner slot	61	11	7.3	18.0%	12.0%	+3.7
Point	32	1	1.0	3.1%	3.2%	0.0
Below goal line	2	0	0.1	0.0%	3.3%	−0.1
Left circle	13	0	0.4	0.0%	2.9%	−0.4
Right circle	20	0	0.5	0.0%	2.7%	−0.5
Outer slot	31	1	2.1	3.2%	6.9%	−1.1
High slot	91	7	8.9	7.7%	9.8%	−1.9
All zones	250	20	20.4	8.0%	8.1%	−0.4

Finishing evidence. Scoring 8.0% on chances against 8.1% expected, tracking the model across 7 zones.

Sorted by goals minus expected goals. Goal rate is goals per unblocked attempt against the expected rate.

Shot profile

Context · not graded

On-net rate: 72.0%
Slot share: 60.8%
Average distance: 27.4 ft
Rebound attempts / 60: 0.87

Shot types

250 attempts

Type	Share	Sh%	G−xG
Wrist	60.0%	11.4%	+0.6
Snap	12.0%	4.5%	−2.1
Backhand	9.2%	15.0%	+0.8
Deflected	6.4%	30.0%	+1.8
Slap	4.8%	9.1%	−0.1
Tip-in	4.8%	0.0%	−1.0
Other	2.8%	—	−0.3

Share is context, not a grade. Sh% counts shots on goal only.

High-danger chances

Model goal probability ≥ 0.20

Conversion15.4%−15.3 pts vs expected

Actual15.4%

Expected30.6%

Attempts: 13
Goals: 2
Expected goals: 4.0
G−xG: −2.0

Shot locations

Loading canonical shot events…

Usage by situation

Ice time, share of team ice time, scoring and scoring rate, with where shifts start.

Scope	TOI/GP	Team share	G	A	P	P/60
Five-on-five	13:43	—	14	28	42	2.48
Power play	2:29	—	3	3	6	1.96
Penalty kill	0:00	—	0	0	0	0.00
Other	0:32	—	4	1	5	7.67
All situations	16:44	—	21	32	53	2.57

Where the 53 points come from · All situations

Goals21 · 1.02/60
Primary assists— · —/60
Secondary assists— · —/60

Zone starts — offensive of OZ + DZ

Offensive —Neutral —Defensive —

Shifts

— a game · — average

Zone starts: five-on-five · Shifts: all situations

Usage by situation

Loading usage…

Power play

183:15 recorded ice time · peers need 100 minutes

Share of team PP: —
PP points: 6
Unit xGF / 60: 7.47

Player	Percentile	Rank
1.96		47 / 518th
—	—	—
9.17		35 / 5132nd
1.66		21 / 5160th
7.47		17 / 5168th
—	—	—

Evidence coverage: goals 13 of 72 games · team time 26 of 74 games.

Penalty kill

0:34 recorded ice time · peers need 100 minutes

Share of team PK: —
SH points: 0
Unit xGA / 60: 0.00

Player	Percentile	Rank
0.00		—
—	—	—
0.00		—
—	—	—
0.00		—

No rank yet

Evidence coverage: goals 1 of 5 games · high danger 1 of 5 games · team time 26 of 74 games.

Loading special teams…

Split	GP	G	A	P	P/GP	5v5 xG share	Team record
Venue
Home	38	10	15	25	0.66	53.6%	22–11–5
Away	36	10	17	27	0.75	54.8%	17–17–2
Rest
Back-to-back	12	3	4	7	0.58	53.4%	5–5–2
1 day of rest	42	14	21	35	0.83	55.1%	20–18–4
2+ days of rest	19	3	7	10	0.53	53.4%	14–5–0
Opponent
vs Eastern	26	5	9	14	0.54	54.9%	13–9–4
vs Western	48	15	23	38	0.79	53.8%	26–19–3
vs playoff teams	37	5	14	19	0.51	55.4%	16–19–2
vs non-playoff teams	37	15	18	33	0.89	53.3%	23–9–5
Recent
Last 10	10	1	2	3	0.30	66.4%	3–5–2

Teammate	Pos	TOI together	xG share together	GF–GA	CF%	Him without	Teammate without
Max Pacioretty	L	459:59	50.4%	19–19	51.2%	56.1%	55.9%
Paul Stastny	C	412:11	57.4%	14–17	56.5%	50.3%	56.6%
Cody Eakin	C	384:30	48.3%	19–15	48.9%	56.4%	48.2%
Shea Theodore	D	355:49	53.2%	8–13	55.2%	53.6%	58.8%
Brayden McNabb	D	317:03	51.3%	12–9	47.9%	54.6%	55.5%
Deryk Engelland	D	313:31	53.5%	13–10	54.4%	53.4%	48.4%
Nate Schmidt	D	297:18	51.7%	11–5	49.7%	54.3%	51.8%
Nick Holden	D	241:34	51.1%	9–14	52.7%	54.2%	55.5%
Colin Miller	D	231:51	58.1%	9–8	55.3%	52.3%	55.7%
Jon Merrill	D	213:54	56.5%	6–11	57.1%	52.7%	60.2%
Brandon Pirri	C	188:06	54.4%	7–5	54.9%	53.2%	63.2%
Jonathan Marchessault	C	108:26	54.8%	0–2	50.5%	53.3%	54.9%

	Opponent	Result		G	A		PPP	+/−	SOG		5v5 on-ice xG share	Game
Apr 23	@ SJS	L 4–5 OT	20:36	0	0	0	—	1	3	0.12	58.1%	View →
Apr 21	vs SJS	L 1–2 OT	23:58	0	0	0	—	-1	7	0.51	69.6%	View →
Apr 18	@ SJS	L 2–5	15:11	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.20	43.2%	View →
Apr 16	vs SJS	W 5–0	15:55	1	0	1	—	1	3	0.31	70.1%	View →
Apr 14	vs SJS	W 6–3	17:10	0	0	0	—	-2	1	0.06	42.1%	View →
Apr 12	@ SJS	W 5–3	13:35	0	1	1	1	1	2	0.13	90.6%	View →
Apr 10	@ SJS	L 2–5	13:05	0	0	0	0	0	1	0.13	57.3%	View →
Filtered 7	—	3–4	17:04 avg	1	1	2	—	0	20	1.45	59.5%	—

	Opponent	Result		G	A		PPP	+/−	SOG		5v5 on-ice xG share	Game
Apr 6	@ LAK	L 2–5	15:53	0	0	0	0	0	2	0.13	44.9%	View →
Apr 4	vs ARI	L 1–4	14:45	0	0	0	—	0	1	0.01	41.5%	View →
Apr 1	vs EDM	W 3–1	15:57	0	1	1	0	1	2	0.02	67.2%	View →
Mar 30	@ SJS	OTL 3–4 OT	13:17	0	0	0	—	-1	4	0.12	53.1%	View →
Mar 29	vs MIN	L 2–3	14:25	0	0	0	—	0	3	0.17	52.4%	View →
Mar 27	@ COL	L 3–4	18:06	1	1	2	—	0	5	0.67	83.0%	View →
Mar 25	@ STL	L 1–3	20:17	0	0	0	—	0	5	0.36	74.5%	View →
Mar 23	vs DET	OTL 2–3 OT	14:43	0	0	0	—	1	2	0.18	81.8%	View →
Mar 21	vs WPG	W 5–0	18:31	0	0	0	—	0	4	0.29	55.9%	View →
Mar 18	@ SJS	W 7–3	14:23	0	0	0	0	-1	1	0.07	58.4%	View →
Filtered 10	—	3–5–2	16:02 avg	1	2	3	—	0	29	2.00	66.4%	—

Teammate	Pos	TOI together	xG share together	GF–GA	CF%	Him without	Teammate without
Max Pacioretty	L	459:59	50.4%	19–19	51.2%	56.1%	55.9%
Paul Stastny	C	412:11	57.4%	14–17	56.5%	50.3%	56.6%
Cody Eakin	C	384:30	48.3%	19–15	48.9%	56.4%	48.2%
Shea Theodore	D	355:49	53.2%	8–13	55.2%	53.6%	58.8%
Brayden McNabb	D	317:03	51.3%	12–9	47.9%	54.6%	55.5%
Deryk Engelland	D	313:31	53.5%	13–10	54.4%	53.4%	48.4%
Nate Schmidt	D	297:18	51.7%	11–5	49.7%	54.3%	51.8%
Nick Holden	D	241:34	51.1%	9–14	52.7%	54.2%	55.5%
Colin Miller	D	231:51	58.1%	9–8	55.3%	52.3%	55.7%
Jon Merrill	D	213:54	56.5%	6–11	57.1%	52.7%	60.2%
Brandon Pirri	C	188:06	54.4%	7–5	54.9%	53.2%	63.2%
Jonathan Marchessault	C	108:26	54.8%	0–2	50.5%	53.3%	54.9%

Split	G	A	P	5v5 xG share	5v5 CF%	5v5 GF–GA
Period
1st period	5	13	18	—	—	—
2nd period	7	11	18	—	—	—
3rd period	7	8	15	—	—	—
Overtime	1	0	1	—	—	—
Score state · 5v5 on ice
Leading	—	—	—	48.2%	48.5%	9–16
Tied	—	—	—	56.4%	53.7%	12–11
Trailing	—	—	—	55.9%	57.1%	13–9

Season	GP	G	A	P	SOG	P/GP	5v5 ixG/60	5v5 GP
2025–26	13	4	3	7	46	0.54	1.53	13
2020–21	19	4	5	9	42	0.47	0.93	19
2019–20	20	8	4	12	51	0.60	1.04	20
2018–19	7	1	1	2	20	0.29	0.92	7
2017–18	20	6	4	10	44	0.50	0.92	20

Season			Box score · all situations												5v5 individual				5v5 on ice					Season performance
Season	Age	Team	GP	G	A	P	+/−	PIM	SOG	Sh%	PPG	TOI/GP	Hits	Blk	P/60	ixG/60	SOG/60	xG/UA	xGF/60	xGA/60	xGF%	CF%	GF%	Perf/60	Grade	Rank
2026–27	30	WSH	9	5	2	7	3	2	24	20.8	0	18:48	10	7	3.21	1.36	8.03	0.094	3.78	2.77	57.7	52.0	—	—	—	—
2025–26	29	BUF	79	33	33	66	24	57	195	16.9	7	19:00	—	—	2.60	0.80	7.86	0.062	2.82	2.65	51.5	51.2	—	—	—	—
2024–25	28	BUF	82	36	31	67	16	47	196	18.4	3	19:15	—	—	—	—	—	0.072	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
2023–24	27	BUF	75	22	37	59	9	54	192	11.5	2	19:30	—	—	2.39	0.87	7.78	0.074	2.93	2.79	51.2	50.9	—	—	—	—
2022–23	26	BUF	74	36	43	79	14	20	218	16.5	8	19:09	—	—	2.87	1.03	9.40	0.076	3.76	3.29	53.3	53.7	—	—	—	—
2021–22	25	BUF	50	12	26	38	-3	14	139	8.6	2	18:25	—	—	2.28	0.93	9.56	0.076	3.10	2.83	52.2	51.7	—	—	—	—
2020–21	24	VGK	55	18	15	33	16	28	142	12.7	2	16:50	—	—	1.78	1.01	9.21	0.077	2.85	2.12	57.3	54.0	—	—	—	—
2019–20	23	VGK	42	8	9	17	-10	8	98	8.2	3	14:37	—	—	1.17	0.93	9.35	0.074	2.23	2.15	50.9	52.4	—	—	—	—
2018–19	22	VGK	74	20	32	52	13	8	180	11.1	3	16:44	—	—	2.48	0.78	8.40	0.069	2.97	2.50	54.2	53.5	—	—	—	—
2017–18	21	VGK	78	15	22	37	3	27	171	8.8	4	15:15	—	—	1.61	0.89	7.84	0.080	2.58	2.37	52.1	51.4	—	—	—	—
2016–17	20	MIN	6	0	0	0	-3	0	8	0.0	0	10:42	—	—	0.00	0.99	7.47	0.106	3.12	2.89	51.9	50.8	—	—	—	—
Career	—	11 seasons	624	205	250	455	82	265	1563	13.1	34	17:45	—	—	—	—	—	0.073	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—

Alex Tuch

Season performanceSelected-season standing and the components behind the scoreCollapse

Season metrics

Season vs reference

Season comparisons

Rolling Radar

Rolling Radar

On-ice impact5v5Strong 54.2% on-ice expected goal share at five-on-five (16th of 102)What the team creates and allows during the player’s five-on-five minutesExplore

Results vs expected

On ice vs off ice

Defense5v5 · AllAverage 2.50 on-ice expected goals against per 60 (54th of 102)On-ice suppression and individual disciplineExplore

Defensive metrics

Discipline & puck management

Penaltiesnet —

Puck eventsnet —

Shooting & finishingAverage 0.78 individual expected goals per 60 (39th of 102)Where the player shoots, the quality of those chances, and actual versus expected goalsExplore

Shot map

Shooting by zone

Shot profile

Shot types

High-danger chances

Shot locations

Usage & deployment16:44 TOI per game (13:43 at five-on-five · 2:29 PP)Scoring by situation, zone starts and workloadExplore

Usage by situation

Where the 53 points come from · All situations

Zone starts — offensive of OZ + DZ

Shifts

Usage by situation

Special teamsPP · PKPoor 1.96 power-play points per 60 (47th of 51)Power play and penalty killExplore

Power play

Penalty kill

FormExplore

Rolling Radar

Splits0.66 points per game at home · 0.75 awayVenue, rest and opponentExplore

By period and score state

Linemates5v5Most often with Max Pacioretty: 460 five-on-five minutes, 50.4% xG share togetherWho he plays with at five-on-fiveExplore

Playoffs7 playoff games: 1 goal, 2 points · 79 career playoff gamesExplore

2018–19 playoffs

Playoff games

Every playoff run

Game log74 games · most recent at LAK, L 2–5: 0 G, 0 AOfficial totals and five-on-five evidenceExplore

Career11 NHL seasons: 624 games, 455 pointsEvery season and a recomputed career lineExplore

Data notesScopes, missing values and model evidenceExplore

2018–19 playoffs

Playoff games

Every playoff run

Defensive metrics

Discipline & puck management

Penaltiesnet —

Puck eventsnet —

Power play

Penalty kill

Results vs expected

On ice vs off ice

Shot map

Shooting by zone

Shot profile

Shot types

High-danger chances

Usage by situation

Where the 53 points come from · All situations

Zone starts — offensive of OZ + DZ

Shifts

By period and score state

Season metrics

Season vs reference