Mikko Rantanen

Dallas Stars#96Right wing Shoots left

Age 29 · 6′4″ · 228 lb · Nousiainen, FIN

No checked season results are available for this selection.

Games82T-5th in NHL

Goals550.67/GP▲0.193rd in NHL

Assists500.61/GP▼0.14T-28th in NHL

Points1051.28/GP▲0.058th in NHL…

5v5 xG share54.3%17th of 105…

Avg TOI22:1344th in NHL…

Career awards

No checked season results are available for this selection.

No complete checked component breakdown is available for this selection.

Loading season standing and profile…

Season metrics

2022–23 · five-on-five · vs 105 positional peers

Player	Percentile	Rank
2.34		12 / 10589th
1.41		4 / 10597th
—	—	—

Shooting & finishing	Player	Percentile	Rank
	0.92		30 / 10572nd
	9.00		18 / 10584th
	15.96		19 / 10583rd
	0.076		48 / 8544th
	0.49		2 / 8599th

Elite90+Strong70–89Average30–69Weak10–29Poor<10Bar length is the peer percentile, so longer is always better · tick at the 50th

How to read these comparisons

Player values are recorded season results. Peer averages are arithmetic means of qualified players in the selected group; each row uses the same peers for its average and rank. Ranks use unrounded values, with tied players sharing a rank and the next rank skipped. Lower xG against ranks better. Bar colours are the five performance tiers; context rows are blue and not graded. Differences from the average describe the season, not isolated player impact.

Goals above expected is the raw goals-minus-xG rate, without the shrinkage used in the older finishing comparison. On-ice measures include teammates, opponents and deployment. These recorded metrics describe different quantities from the adjusted Season score components beside them.

Skaters need 20 appearances and 300 five-on-five minutes; quality and finishing also need 75 unblocked attempts. Early in a season these minimums scale down with games played so far. At least 30 peers must qualify. Playoff ranks are withheld. A reviewed axis whose own evidence fails is withheld and shown with its reason rather than ranked. These workload rules do not express statistical confidence.

Position uses the NHL listed primary position available now; it does not establish historical position or actual deployment. Broad groups are forwards, defence and goalies. This version uses the current model’s covered games only.

Season vs reference

Reference

Per game · all situations

Metric2022–23ReferenceDiff

0.670.48+0.19

0.610.75-0.14

1.281.23+0.05

3.733.39+0.35

Reference: 2021–22 · 75 games.

Season comparisons

Loading peer comparisons and model evidence…

Optional recent-history profile

Rolling Radar

Recent NHL history, carried across seasons. The radar compares this broader profile with a fixed position-group reference.

Rolling profile is currently unavailable.

Rolling Radar

Loading recent-history profile…

Results vs expected

Five-on-five · what happened beside the chances created and allowed

Chances	Player	Percentile	Rank
	3.16		17 / 10585th
	2.66		40 / 10563rd
	54.3		17 / 10585th

Player	Percentile	Rank
—	—	—
—	—	—
—	—	—

Player	Percentile	Rank
—	—	—
—	—	—
—	—	—

Context · not graded

5v5 goals: —
5v5 expected: 71.7–60.3
EPV added: +4.69

On ice vs off ice

Colorado's share with Mikko Rantanen on the ice against the same team without him.

Share	On ice and off ice	On-minus-off gap in percentage points
xGF%	On ice 54.3% · Off ice unavailable	—
CF%	On ice 53.6% · Off ice unavailable	—
GF%	On ice unavailable · Off ice unavailable	—

On iceOff ice

Scale 40–65% · marker at 50% · right column is the on-minus-off gap in points

Loading model evidence…

Defensive metrics

Five-on-five on-ice suppression; individual events in all situations.

Player	Percentile	Rank
59.10		72 / 10532nd
—	—	—
0.059		5 / 10596th

Player	Percentile	Rank
—	—	—
—	—	—
—	—	—

Physical style	Player	Percentile	Rank
	—	—	—
	—	—	—

Context · not graded

Evidence coverage: high danger 25 of 82 games.

Discipline & puck management

Recorded season event counts · all situations

Penaltiesnet —

Taken —Drawn —

Puck eventsnet —

Giveaways —Takeaways —

Blocks: —
Hits: —

Both penalty counts cover 29 of 82 games with every drawn role recorded.

Loading defensive evidence…

SituationChancesViewShot type

Shot map

All 428 attempts

Goal55Shot on goal252Missed shot121Blocked shot0Larger dot = higher xG

Shooting by zone

Hover a row to light it up · click to pin

Zone	Att	G	xG	Goal rate	Exp.	G−xG
Inner slot	100	21	12.9	21.0%	12.9%	+8.1
Right circle	34	4	1.8	11.8%	5.4%	+2.2
Outer slot	48	6	5.0	12.5%	10.4%	+1.0
Below goal line	4	1	0.2	25.0%	5.1%	+0.8
High slot	146	18	17.5	12.3%	12.0%	+0.5
Point	80	5	4.8	6.3%	6.1%	+0.2
Left circle	16	0	0.4	0.0%	2.7%	−0.4
All zones	428	55	42.8	12.9%	10.0%	+12.2

Finishing evidence. Scoring 12.9% on chances vs 10.0% expected (+2.9 points), led by inner slot volume and wrist finishing.

Sorted by goals minus expected goals. Goal rate is goals per unblocked attempt against the expected rate.

Shot profile

Context · not graded

On-net rate: 71.7%
Slot share: 57.5%
Average distance: 29.1 ft
Rebound attempts / 60: 0.76

Shot types

428 attempts

Type	Share	Sh%	G−xG
Wrist	55.6%	16.6%	+5.1
Snap	15.4%	16.0%	+0.4
Tip-in	12.1%	13.3%	−0.3
Backhand	6.5%	19.0%	+1.5
Slap	5.4%	20.0%	+2.0
Deflected	3.5%	36.4%	+1.9
Other	1.4%	—	+1.6

Share is context, not a grade. Sh% counts shots on goal only.

High-danger chances

Model goal probability ≥ 0.20

Conversion35.5%−2.4 pts vs expected

Actual35.5%

Expected37.9%

Attempts: 31
Goals: 11
Expected goals: 11.7
G−xG: −0.7

Shot locations

Loading canonical shot events…

Usage by situation

Ice time, share of team ice time, scoring and scoring rate, with where shifts start.

Scope	TOI/GP	Team share	G	A	P	P/60
Five-on-five	16:36	—	32	21	53	2.34
Power play	4:08	—	12	24	36	6.36
Penalty kill	0:02	—	0	0	0	0.00
Other	1:27	—	13	5	18	9.05
All situations	22:13	—	57	50	107	3.52

Where the 107 points come from · All situations

Goals57 · 1.88/60
Primary assists— · —/60
Secondary assists— · —/60

Zone starts — offensive of OZ + DZ

Offensive —Neutral —Defensive —

Shifts

— a game · — average

Zone starts: five-on-five · Shifts: all situations

Faceoffs

All situations · zones are read from his side of the draw · values only; no peer ranks yet

Win %: 49.0%
Draws per game: 5.52
Offensive zone: 49.3%
Defensive zone: 48.0%
Power play: 43.7%

Usage by situation

Loading usage…

Power play

339:31 recorded ice time · peers need 100 minutes

Share of team PP: —
PP points: 36
Unit xGF / 60: 8.24

Player	Percentile	Rank
6.36		6 / 5090th
—	—	—
13.25		22 / 5057th
2.09		22 / 5057th
8.24		24 / 5053rd
—	—	—

Evidence coverage: goals 9 of 81 games · team time 29 of 82 games.

Penalty kill

3:03 recorded ice time · peers need 100 minutes

Share of team PK: —
SH points: 0
Unit xGA / 60: 18.83

Player	Percentile	Rank
18.83		—
—	—	—
137.70		—
—	—	—
0.00		—

No rank yet

Evidence coverage: goals 1 of 17 games · high danger 1 of 17 games · team time 29 of 82 games.

Loading special teams…

Split	GP	G	A	P	P/GP	5v5 xG share	Team record
Venue
Home	41	30	25	55	1.34	53.4%	22–13–6
Away	41	25	25	50	1.22	55.1%	29–11–1
Rest
Back-to-back	13	6	10	16	1.23	48.1%	10–2–1
1 day of rest	49	37	25	62	1.27	57.5%	29–16–4
2+ days of rest	19	12	11	23	1.21	50.7%	11–6–2
Opponent
vs Eastern	32	18	14	32	1.00	51.5%	18–11–3
vs Western	50	37	36	73	1.46	56.3%	33–13–4
vs playoff teams	39	16	18	34	0.87	46.9%	19–14–6
vs non-playoff teams	43	39	32	71	1.65	61.1%	32–10–1
Recent
Last 10	10	7	11	18	1.80	57.6%	8–1–1

Teammate	Pos	TOI together	xG share together	GF–GA	CF%	Him without	Teammate without
Nathan MacKinnon	C	853:17	56.0%	38–32	57.2%	53.8%	55.8%
Devon Toews	D	748:43	57.9%	27–27	56.8%	51.6%	52.8%
Cale Makar	D	653:45	57.4%	19–27	58.9%	53.4%	55.7%
Artturi Lehkonen	L	518:10	54.4%	13–19	54.9%	55.6%	55.9%
J.T. Compher	L	492:44	57.3%	21–9	53.5%	54.2%	49.9%
Samuel Girard	D	452:49	55.5%	26–14	55.3%	55.0%	51.1%
Evan Rodrigues	C	405:02	55.8%	26–16	54.8%	54.9%	56.2%
Valeri Nichushkin	R	261:45	62.4%	12–4	62.2%	53.8%	49.9%
Bowen Byram	D	255:49	47.6%	13–10	51.3%	57.0%	52.0%
Erik Johnson	D	220:38	46.9%	9–3	46.2%	56.7%	47.1%
Alex Newhook	C	151:04	55.3%	7–3	48.6%	55.2%	51.5%
Brad Hunt	D	116:16	65.5%	5–3	59.3%	54.4%	47.6%

	Opponent	Result		G	A		PPP	+/−	SOG		5v5 on-ice xG share	Game
Apr 30	vs SEA	L 1–2	23:14	1	0	1	—	-1	3	0.28	70.7%	View →
Apr 28	@ SEA	W 4–1	23:44	1	1	2	0	3	6	0.34	63.8%	View →
Apr 26	vs SEA	L 2–3	23:35	0	1	1	—	1	5	0.03	44.2%	View →
Apr 24	@ SEA	L 2–3 OT	20:45	2	0	2	—	0	2	0.22	39.3%	View →
Apr 22	@ SEA	W 6–4	18:19	2	1	3	0	2	6	0.61	83.1%	View →
Apr 20	vs SEA	W 3–2	19:47	0	0	0	0	-1	2	0.06	46.1%	View →
Apr 18	vs SEA	L 1–3	20:41	1	0	1	—	0	3	0.16	52.8%	View →
Filtered 7	—	3–4	21:26 avg	7	3	10	—	4	27	1.70	59.0%	—

	Opponent	Result		G	A		PPP	+/−	SOG		5v5 on-ice xG share	Game
Apr 14	@ NSH	W 4–3	19:02	0	2	2	0	3	2	0.23	67.5%	View →
Apr 13	vs WPG	W 4–2	19:20	1	0	1	1	-2	2	0.00	27.1%	View →
Apr 11	vs EDM	OTL 1–2 OT	23:17	0	0	0	—	0	5	0.41	45.4%	View →
Apr 9	@ ANA	W 5–4 OT	25:19	2	2	4	—	-1	4	0.11	66.1%	View →
Apr 8	@ LAK	W 4–3	21:32	0	0	0	0	-2	0	0.24	44.4%	View →
Apr 6	@ SJS	W 6–2	17:51	3	1	4	—	5	6	0.78	63.0%	View →
Apr 4	@ SJS	W 4–3 OT	24:59	0	2	2	—	2	8	0.54	79.8%	View →
Apr 1	vs DAL	W 5–2	21:56	1	3	4	1	3	4	0.20	41.3%	View →
Mar 29	vs MIN	L 2–4	24:06	0	0	0	0	-3	4	0.22	69.6%	View →
Mar 27	@ ANA	W 5–1	20:46	0	1	1	—	1	4	0.27	60.6%	View →
Filtered 10	—	8–1–1	21:49 avg	7	11	18	—	6	39	3.01	57.6%	—

Teammate	Pos	TOI together	xG share together	GF–GA	CF%	Him without	Teammate without
Nathan MacKinnon	C	853:17	56.0%	38–32	57.2%	53.8%	55.8%
Devon Toews	D	748:43	57.9%	27–27	56.8%	51.6%	52.8%
Cale Makar	D	653:45	57.4%	19–27	58.9%	53.4%	55.7%
Artturi Lehkonen	L	518:10	54.4%	13–19	54.9%	55.6%	55.9%
J.T. Compher	L	492:44	57.3%	21–9	53.5%	54.2%	49.9%
Samuel Girard	D	452:49	55.5%	26–14	55.3%	55.0%	51.1%
Evan Rodrigues	C	405:02	55.8%	26–16	54.8%	54.9%	56.2%
Valeri Nichushkin	R	261:45	62.4%	12–4	62.2%	53.8%	49.9%
Bowen Byram	D	255:49	47.6%	13–10	51.3%	57.0%	52.0%
Erik Johnson	D	220:38	46.9%	9–3	46.2%	56.7%	47.1%
Alex Newhook	C	151:04	55.3%	7–3	48.6%	55.2%	51.5%
Brad Hunt	D	116:16	65.5%	5–3	59.3%	54.4%	47.6%

Split	G	A	P	5v5 xG share	5v5 CF%	5v5 GF–GA
Period
1st period	14	16	30	—	—	—
2nd period	24	16	40	—	—	—
3rd period	14	16	30	—	—	—
Overtime	3	2	5	—	—	—
Score state · 5v5 on ice
Leading	—	—	—	50.8%	49.0%	25–21
Tied	—	—	—	59.5%	57.3%	17–9
Trailing	—	—	—	57.4%	60.1%	17–15

Season	GP	G	A	P	SOG	P/GP	5v5 ixG/60	5v5 GP
2025–26	6	1	6	7	14	1.17	0.31	6
2024–25	18	9	13	22	50	1.22	0.92	18
2023–24	11	4	10	14	32	1.27	0.61	11
2022–23	7	7	3	10	27	1.43	0.91	7
2021–22	20	5	20	25	53	1.25	0.55	20
2020–21	10	5	8	13	32	1.30	0.51	10
2019–20	15	7	14	21	55	1.40	0.94	15
2018–19	12	6	8	14	34	1.17	0.86	12
2017–18	6	0	4	4	10	0.67	0.69	6

Season			Box score · all situations												5v5 individual				5v5 on ice					Season performance
Season	Age	Team	GP	G	A	P	+/−	PIM	SOG	Sh%	PPG	TOI/GP	Hits	Blk	P/60	ixG/60	SOG/60	xG/UA	xGF/60	xGA/60	xGF%	CF%	GF%	Perf/60	Grade	Rank
2026–27	30	DAL	9	5	6	11	6	10	21	23.8	1	19:27	10	3	3.89	0.77	5.83	0.094	2.54	2.32	52.3	51.9	—	—	—	—
2025–26	29	DAL	64	22	55	77	0	93	139	15.8	6	20:11	—	—	2.34	0.68	5.43	0.083	2.74	2.30	54.4	45.3	—	—	—	—
2024–25	28	CAR, COL, DAL	82	32	56	88	13	60	212	15.1	11	21:15	—	—	—	—	—	0.090	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
2023–24	27	COL	80	42	62	104	19	50	271	15.5	14	22:54	—	—	2.37	0.91	7.71	0.079	3.24	2.53	56.1	54.5	—	—	—	—
2022–23	26	COL	82	55	50	105	15	82	306	18.0	13	22:13	—	—	2.34	0.92	9.00	0.076	3.16	2.66	54.3	53.6	—	—	—	—
2021–22	25	COL	75	36	56	92	35	56	254	14.2	16	20:59	—	—	2.35	0.85	7.51	0.078	3.22	2.32	58.2	56.2	—	—	—	—
2020–21	24	COL	52	30	36	66	30	34	177	16.9	9	19:55	—	—	2.67	0.83	8.17	0.072	2.87	1.60	64.2	63.5	—	—	—	—
2019–20	23	COL	42	19	22	41	-2	14	107	17.8	8	18:57	—	—	2.27	0.66	7.02	0.069	2.76	2.25	55.0	53.1	—	—	—	—
2018–19	22	COL	74	31	56	87	13	54	193	16.1	16	20:51	—	—	2.17	0.63	6.77	0.072	2.67	2.49	51.7	53.7	—	—	—	—
2017–18	21	COL	81	29	55	84	0	34	178	16.3	12	18:58	—	—	2.09	0.54	5.48	0.073	2.53	2.51	50.2	50.3	—	—	—	—
2016–17	20	COL	75	20	18	38	-25	22	133	15.0	4	18:03	—	—	1.45	0.55	5.71	0.068	2.19	2.87	43.2	47.7	—	—	—	—
2015–16	19	COL	9	0	0	0	-7	2	9	0.0	0	8:57	—	—	0.00	0.59	6.80	0.071	2.13	4.14	34.0	36.8	—	—	—	—
Career	—	12 seasons	725	321	472	793	97	511	2000	16.1	110	20:23	—	—	—	—	—	0.077	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—

Mikko Rantanen

Season performanceSelected-season standing and the components behind the scoreCollapse

Season metrics

Season vs reference

Season comparisons

Rolling Radar

Rolling Radar

On-ice impact5v5Strong 54.3% on-ice expected goal share at five-on-five (17th of 105)What the team creates and allows during the player’s five-on-five minutesExplore

Results vs expected

On ice vs off ice

Defense5v5 · AllAverage 2.66 on-ice expected goals against per 60 (40th of 105)On-ice suppression and individual disciplineExplore

Defensive metrics

Discipline & puck management

Penaltiesnet —

Puck eventsnet —

Shooting & finishingStrong 0.92 individual expected goals per 60 (30th of 105)Where the player shoots, the quality of those chances, and actual versus expected goalsExplore

Shot map

Shooting by zone

Shot profile

Shot types

High-danger chances

Shot locations

Usage & deployment22:13 TOI per game (16:36 at five-on-five · 4:08 PP · 0:02 PK)Scoring by situation, zone starts and workloadExplore

Usage by situation

Where the 107 points come from · All situations

Zone starts — offensive of OZ + DZ

Shifts

Faceoffs

Usage by situation

Special teamsPP · PKElite 6.36 power-play points per 60 (6th of 50)Power play and penalty killExplore

Power play

Penalty kill

FormExplore

Rolling Radar

Splits1.34 points per game at home · 1.22 awayVenue, rest and opponentExplore

By period and score state

Linemates5v5Most often with Nathan MacKinnon: 853 five-on-five minutes, 56.0% xG share togetherWho he plays with at five-on-fiveExplore

Playoffs7 playoff games: 7 goals, 10 points · 105 career playoff gamesExplore

2022–23 playoffs

Playoff games

Every playoff run

Game log82 games · most recent at NSH, W 4–3: 0 G, 2 AOfficial totals and five-on-five evidenceExplore

Career12 NHL seasons: 725 games, 793 pointsEvery season and a recomputed career lineExplore

Data notesScopes, missing values and model evidenceExplore

2022–23 playoffs

Playoff games

Every playoff run

Defensive metrics

Discipline & puck management

Penaltiesnet —

Puck eventsnet —

Power play

Penalty kill

Results vs expected

On ice vs off ice

Shot map

Shooting by zone

Shot profile

Shot types

High-danger chances

Usage by situation

Where the 107 points come from · All situations

Zone starts — offensive of OZ + DZ

Shifts

Faceoffs

By period and score state

Season metrics

Season vs reference