Mikhail Sergachev

Utah Mammoth#98Defenseman Shoots left

Age 28 · 6′3″ · 212 lb · Nizhnekamsk, RUS

No checked season results are available for this selection.

Games10

Goals30.30/GP▲0.17

Assists80.80/GP▲0.17

Points111.10/GP▲0.34

5v5 xG share61.4%13th of 148…

Career awards

No checked season results are available for this selection.

No complete checked component breakdown is available for this selection.

Loading season standing and profile…

Season metrics

2026–27 · five-on-five · vs 148 positional peers

Production	Player	Percentile	Rank
	2.23		4 / 14898th
	0.37		36 / 14876th
	0.74		17 / 14889th

Shooting & finishing	Player	Percentile	Rank
	0.30		22 / 14886th
	7.42		9 / 14895th
	14.48		17 / 14889th
	0.031		47 / 10656th
	0.07		40 / 10663rd

Elite90+Strong70–89Average30–69Weak10–29Poor<10Bar length is the peer percentile, so longer is always better · tick at the 50th

How to read these comparisons

Player values are recorded season results. Peer averages are arithmetic means of qualified players in the selected group; each row uses the same peers for its average and rank. Ranks use unrounded values, with tied players sharing a rank and the next rank skipped. Lower xG against ranks better. Bar colours are the five performance tiers; context rows are blue and not graded. Differences from the average describe the season, not isolated player impact.

Goals above expected is the raw goals-minus-xG rate, without the shrinkage used in the older finishing comparison. On-ice measures include teammates, opponents and deployment. These recorded metrics describe different quantities from the adjusted Season score components beside them.

Skaters need 20 appearances and 300 five-on-five minutes; quality and finishing also need 75 unblocked attempts. Early in a season these minimums scale down with games played so far. At least 30 peers must qualify. Playoff ranks are withheld. A reviewed axis whose own evidence fails is withheld and shown with its reason rather than ranked. These workload rules do not express statistical confidence.

Position uses the NHL listed primary position available now; it does not establish historical position or actual deployment. Broad groups are forwards, defence and goalies. This version uses the current model’s covered games only.

Season vs reference

Reference

Per game · all situations

Metric2026–27ReferenceDiff

0.300.13+0.17

0.800.63+0.17

1.100.76+0.34

2.702.04+0.66

Reference: 2025–26 · 78 games.

Season comparisons

Loading peer comparisons and model evidence…

Optional recent-history profile

Rolling Radar

Recent NHL history, carried across seasons. The radar compares this broader profile with a fixed position-group reference.

Rolling profile is currently unavailable.

Rolling Radar

Loading recent-history profile…

Results vs expected

Five-on-five · what happened beside the chances created and allowed

Chances	Player	Percentile	Rank
	3.78		3 / 14899th
	2.38		56 / 14863rd
	61.4		13 / 14892nd

Goals	Player	Percentile	Rank
	3.71		12 / 6783rd
	2.60		38 / 6744th
	58.8		20 / 6771st

Luck & variance	Player	Percentile	Rank
	11.5		26 / 6762nd
	88.3		45 / 6733rd
	99.83		31 / 6755th

Context · not graded

5v5 goals: 10–7
5v5 expected: 10.2–6.4
EPV added: —

On ice vs off ice

Utah's share with Mikhail Sergachev on the ice against the same team without him.

Share	On ice and off ice	On-minus-off gap in percentage points
xGF%	On ice 61.4%; off ice 59.7%.	+1.7
CF%	On ice 54.3%; off ice 58.0%.	-3.7
GF%	On ice 58.8%; off ice 54.2%.	+4.7

On iceOff ice

Scale 40–65% · marker at 50% · right column is the on-minus-off gap in points

Loading model evidence…

Defensive metrics

Five-on-five on-ice suppression; individual events in all situations.

Suppression	Player	Percentile	Rank
	57.53		78 / 14848th
	2.60		82 / 9211th
	0.063		72 / 14852nd

Puck management	Player	Percentile	Rank
	1.32		27 / 14882nd
	3.44		83 / 14844th
	-0.53		99 / 14833rd

Physical style	Player	Percentile	Rank
	2.91		114 / 14823rd
	1.59		98 / 14834th

Context · not graded

Discipline & puck management

Recorded season event counts · all situations

Penaltiesnet -2

Taken 4Drawn 2

Puck eventsnet -8

Giveaways 13Takeaways 5

Blocks: 11
Hits: 6

Loading defensive evidence…

SituationChancesViewShot type

Shot map

All 34 attempts

Goal3Shot on goal24Missed shot7Blocked shot0Larger dot = higher xG

Shooting by zone

Hover a row to light it up · click to pin

Zone	Att	G	xG	Goal rate	Exp.	G−xG
Point	24	2	0.7	8.3%	3.1%	+1.3
Inner slot	1	1	0.1	100.0%	8.2%	+0.9
Below goal line	2	0	0.0	0.0%	1.1%	0.0
Left circle	1	0	0.0	0.0%	3.9%	0.0
Right circle	2	0	0.0	0.0%	2.5%	0.0
High slot	4	0	0.4	0.0%	10.9%	−0.4
All zones	34	3	1.4	8.8%	4.0%	+1.6

Finishing evidence. Scoring 8.8% on chances vs 4.0% expected (+4.8 points), led by point volume and wrist finishing.

Sorted by goals minus expected goals. Goal rate is goals per unblocked attempt against the expected rate.

Shot profile

Context · not graded

On-net rate: 79.4%
Slot share: 14.7%
Average distance: 47.4 ft
Rebound attempts / 60: 0.79

Shot types

34 attempts

Type	Share	Sh%	G−xG
Snap	44.1%	7.1%	+0.1
Slap	38.2%	12.5%	+0.6
Wrist	14.7%	25.0%	+0.9
Backhand	2.9%	0.0%	0.0

Share is context, not a grade. Sh% counts shots on goal only.

Shot locations

Loading canonical shot events…

Usage by situation

Ice time, share of team ice time, scoring and scoring rate, with where shifts start.

Scope	TOI/GP	Team share	G	A	P	P/60	Rank (D)
Five-on-five	16:10	33.1%	1	5	6	2.23	4 / 148
Power play	3:37	67.0%	1	3	4	6.64	—
Penalty kill	2:00	46.6%	0	0	0	0.00	—
Other	0:54	—	1	0	1	6.69	27 / 148
All situations	22:41	37.8%	3	8	11	2.91	3 / 148

Where the 11 points come from · All situations

Goals3 · 0.79/60
Primary assists3 · 0.79/60
Secondary assists5 · 1.32/60

45.5% of points are secondary assists. Peer average 46.1%. Primary points per 60 (1.59) rank 6 of 148 among defensemen.

Zone starts 31.7% offensive of OZ + DZ · 12th percentile

Offensive 19.4%Neutral 38.8%Defensive 41.7%

Shifts

29.1 a game · 0:47 average

Zone starts: five-on-five · Shifts: all situations

Usage by situation

Loading usage…

Power play

36:10 recorded ice time · peers need 100 minutes

Share of team PP: 67.0%
PP points: 4
Unit xGF / 60: 9.14

Power play rates	Player	Percentile	Rank
	6.64		—
	3.32		—
	8.29		—
	0.58		—
	9.14		—
	16.59		—

No rank yet

Penalty kill

20:01 recorded ice time · peers need 100 minutes

Share of team PK: 46.6%
SH points: 0
Unit xGA / 60: 8.36

Penalty kill rates	Player	Percentile	Rank
	8.36		—
	23.98		—
	113.91		—
	8.99		—
	0.03		—

No rank yet

Loading special teams…

Split	GP	G	A	P	P/GP	5v5 xG share	Team record
Venue
Home	4	2	3	5	1.25	58.4%	3–1–0
Away	6	1	5	6	1.00	63.1%	4–2–0
Rest
Back-to-back	1	0	0	0	0.00	66.7%	0–1–0
1 day of rest	7	2	6	8	1.14	59.7%	5–2–0
2+ days of rest	1	1	1	2	2.00	43.0%	1–0–0
Opponent
vs Eastern	7	2	7	9	1.29	64.5%	5–2–0
vs Western	3	1	1	2	0.67	55.2%	2–1–0
vs playoff teams	5	2	1	3	0.60	57.7%	2–3–0
vs non-playoff teams	5	1	7	8	1.60	65.5%	5–0–0
Recent
Last 10	10	3	8	11	1.10	61.4%	7–3–0

Split	G	A	P	5v5 xG share	5v5 CF%	5v5 GF–GA
Period
1st period	1	3	4	—	—	—
2nd period	1	4	5	—	—	—
3rd period	1	1	2	—	—	—
Score state · 5v5 on ice
Leading	—	—	—	51.1%	45.1%	3–4
Tied	—	—	—	62.0%	56.8%	3–2
Trailing	—	—	—	74.1%	67.0%	4–1

Teammate	Pos	TOI together	xG share together	GF–GA	CF%	Him without	Teammate without
MacKenzie Weegar	D	123:36	62.9%	4–7	57.3%	57.4%	63.9%
Clayton Keller	R	57:15	60.8%	4–4	55.7%	61.7%	55.2%
Nick Schmaltz	C	56:52	58.4%	3–6	53.8%	63.2%	53.0%
Logan Cooley	C	50:34	70.9%	2–1	59.1%	57.8%	55.4%
Vincent Trocheck	C	49:26	70.7%	1–3	57.8%	56.0%	55.5%
Dylan Guenther	R	48:36	65.5%	3–1	56.7%	60.0%	59.0%
Lawson Crouse	L	48:07	62.2%	2–2	62.0%	61.1%	52.3%
Kevin Stenlund	C	38:45	36.5%	2–1	34.4%	65.7%	61.9%
Barrett Hayton	C	37:22	70.7%	3–0	67.9%	59.0%	68.2%
Jack McBain	C	34:16	56.6%	2–0	51.4%	62.4%	62.5%
Anders Lee	L	33:34	70.8%	3–2	60.0%	58.3%	62.9%
Daniil But	L	33:14	38.3%	2–0	33.9%	65.4%	66.7%

Season	GP	G	A	P	SOG	P/GP	5v5 ixG/60	5v5 GP
2025–26	6	0	5	5	7	0.83	0.05	6
2023–24	2	0	1	1	2	0.50	0.30	2
2022–23	6	1	2	3	11	0.50	0.08	6
2021–22	23	2	8	10	26	0.43	0.17	23
2020–21	22	0	3	3	27	0.14	0.14	22
2019–20	25	3	7	10	52	0.40	0.17	25
2018–19	4	1	1	2	9	0.50	0.14	4
2017–18	17	2	3	5	26	0.29	0.13	17

	Opponent	Result		G	A		PPP	+/−	SOG		5v5 on-ice xG share	Game
Oct 19	vs PIT	W 5–4	24:54	0	1	1	0	2	4	0.19	65.5%	View →
Oct 17	vs EDM	L 2–6	21:01	1	0	1	0	-1	4	0.07	47.5%	View →
Oct 15	@ EDM	W 4–2	24:42	0	0	0	0	0	2	0.09	44.9%	View →
Oct 13	vs TOR	W 5–4	23:39	1	1	2	0	3	2	0.00	43.0%	View →
Oct 10	@ BUF	W 4–1	25:23	0	1	1	0	1	3	0.20	63.3%	View →
Oct 8	@ BOS	L 1–6	23:16	0	0	0	0	-1	0	0.00	81.0%	View →
Oct 6	@ NJD	W 5–3	15:04	0	3	3	2	0	2	0.03	60.0%	View →
Oct 4	@ NYR	L 2–4	23:51	0	0	0	0	0	3	0.13	66.7%	View →
Oct 3	@ CBJ	W 4–1	22:01	1	1	2	2	-1	4	0.03	61.7%	View →
Oct 1	vs CHI	W 6–0	22:57	0	1	1	0	1	3	0.07	75.4%	View →
Filtered 10	—	7–3–0	22:41 avg	3	8	11	4	4	27	0.80	61.4%	—

Season	Box score · all situations	5v5 individual	5v5 on ice	Season performance
2026–27	28	UTA	10	3	8	11	4	8	27	11.1	1	22:41	6	11	2.23	0.30	7.42	0.031	3.78	2.38	61.4	54.3	58.8	—	—	—
2025–26	27	UTA	78	10	49	59	2	44	159	6.3	5	24:18	—	—	1.17	0.18	4.41	0.029	2.61	2.55	50.6	52.5	—	—	—	—
2024–25	26	UTA	77	15	38	53	-8	32	132	11.4	3	25:07	—	—	—	—	—	0.028	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
2023–24	25	TBL	34	2	17	19	-16	16	53	3.8	0	22:33	—	—	0.92	0.17	3.98	0.028	2.83	2.76	50.6	49.8	—	—	—	—
2022–23	24	TBL	79	10	54	64	13	53	156	6.4	3	23:49	—	—	1.39	0.25	5.06	0.034	3.60	2.87	55.7	52.3	—	—	—	—
2021–22	23	TBL	78	7	31	38	6	59	149	4.7	1	22:28	—	—	1.12	0.22	5.02	0.031	3.16	2.63	54.6	50.5	—	—	—	—
2020–21	22	TBL	56	4	26	30	5	30	108	3.7	0	21:58	—	—	1.20	0.22	4.86	0.032	2.52	2.36	51.7	50.3	—	—	—	—
2019–20	21	TBL	70	10	24	34	15	58	118	8.5	5	20:22	—	—	1.01	0.23	4.29	0.037	2.54	2.10	54.8	52.9	—	—	—	—
2018–19	20	TBL	75	6	26	32	12	28	128	4.7	0	17:55	—	—	1.27	0.27	5.60	0.034	2.87	2.35	54.9	54.2	—	—	—	—
2017–18	19	TBL	79	9	31	40	11	38	141	6.4	3	15:22	—	—	1.29	0.32	6.38	0.033	2.94	2.59	53.2	54.1	—	—	—	—
2016–17	18	MTL	4	0	0	0	1	0	2	0.0	0	12:08	—	—	0.00	0.14	2.58	0.037	2.34	3.97	37.1	43.0	—	—	—	—
Career	—	11 seasons	640	76	304	380	45	366	1173	6.5	21	21:26	—	—	—	—	—	0.032	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—

2 award records

Stanley Cup · 2020–21
Stanley Cup · 2019–20

Every metric name opens its definition; the full list lives in Metrics.

Traditional statistics cover all situations. Supporting five-on-five analyses use completed games, raw adjustment and exposure from xG model v4. The two samples can differ.

An em dash means unavailable, not zero. A partial season remains partial. Where a panel reports evidence coverage, its rates use only the covered games. History never substitutes a different model, and a missing appearance interrupts a rolling model window.

Shot maps use the same shot model as Game Center and show which model version scored recent shots beside the rink. Older seasons can use earlier model versions. High danger means a model scoring probability of at least 0.20 on an unblocked attempt; for goalies, medium danger is 0.08 to 0.20 and low is below 0.08.

Special-team buckets include the wider recorded man-advantage and man-down states, read from the player’s own team; for a goalie, penalty kill means facing a power play. Their ranks need 100 recorded minutes and at least 30 qualified peers; below 100 minutes, penalty-kill percentiles are provisional. Playoff values have no ranks or percentiles. Team share is player ice time divided by team ice time in that situation, over the games the player dressed. Zone starts describe faceoff-started five-on-five shifts and exclude on-the-fly starts.

Penalties count events, including one for a double minor; bench and served-by roles are excluded, and victimless infractions have no drawn role. EPV added sums changes in the probability that the possessing team scores next; it is not standings points or an isolated player grade. Rolling windows never cross seasons or season types, and a missed game is not a zero-performance appearance. Career rates use summed counts and exposure, never an average of season rates; a missing contributing season withholds its career metric, and Performance begins in 2023–24.

Explore the full methodology →

Season			Box score · all situations												5v5 individual				5v5 on ice					Season performance
Season	Age	Team	GP	G	A	P	+/−	PIM	SOG	Sh%	PPG	TOI/GP	Hits	Blk	P/60	ixG/60	SOG/60	xG/UA	xGF/60	xGA/60	xGF%	CF%	GF%	Perf/60	Grade	Rank
2026–27	28	UTA	10	3	8	11	4	8	27	11.1	1	22:41	6	11	2.23	0.30	7.42	0.031	3.78	2.38	61.4	54.3	58.8	—	—	—
2025–26	27	UTA	78	10	49	59	2	44	159	6.3	5	24:18	—	—	1.17	0.18	4.41	0.029	2.61	2.55	50.6	52.5	—	—	—	—
2024–25	26	UTA	77	15	38	53	-8	32	132	11.4	3	25:07	—	—	—	—	—	0.028	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
2023–24	25	TBL	34	2	17	19	-16	16	53	3.8	0	22:33	—	—	0.92	0.17	3.98	0.028	2.83	2.76	50.6	49.8	—	—	—	—
2022–23	24	TBL	79	10	54	64	13	53	156	6.4	3	23:49	—	—	1.39	0.25	5.06	0.034	3.60	2.87	55.7	52.3	—	—	—	—
2021–22	23	TBL	78	7	31	38	6	59	149	4.7	1	22:28	—	—	1.12	0.22	5.02	0.031	3.16	2.63	54.6	50.5	—	—	—	—
2020–21	22	TBL	56	4	26	30	5	30	108	3.7	0	21:58	—	—	1.20	0.22	4.86	0.032	2.52	2.36	51.7	50.3	—	—	—	—
2019–20	21	TBL	70	10	24	34	15	58	118	8.5	5	20:22	—	—	1.01	0.23	4.29	0.037	2.54	2.10	54.8	52.9	—	—	—	—
2018–19	20	TBL	75	6	26	32	12	28	128	4.7	0	17:55	—	—	1.27	0.27	5.60	0.034	2.87	2.35	54.9	54.2	—	—	—	—
2017–18	19	TBL	79	9	31	40	11	38	141	6.4	3	15:22	—	—	1.29	0.32	6.38	0.033	2.94	2.59	53.2	54.1	—	—	—	—
2016–17	18	MTL	4	0	0	0	1	0	2	0.0	0	12:08	—	—	0.00	0.14	2.58	0.037	2.34	3.97	37.1	43.0	—	—	—	—
Career	—	11 seasons	640	76	304	380	45	366	1173	6.5	21	21:26	—	—	—	—	—	0.032	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—

Mikhail Sergachev

Season performanceSelected-season standing and the components behind the scoreCollapse

Season metrics

Season vs reference

Season comparisons

Rolling Radar

Rolling Radar

On-ice impact5v5Elite 61.4% on-ice expected goal share at five-on-five (13th of 148)What the team creates and allows during the player’s five-on-five minutesExplore

Results vs expected

On ice vs off ice

Defense5v5 · AllAverage 2.38 on-ice expected goals against per 60 (56th of 148)On-ice suppression and individual disciplineExplore

Defensive metrics

Discipline & puck management

Penaltiesnet -2

Puck eventsnet -8

Shooting & finishingStrong 0.30 individual expected goals per 60 (22nd of 148)Where the player shoots, the quality of those chances, and actual versus expected goalsExplore

Shot map

Shooting by zone

Shot profile

Shot types

Shot locations

Usage & deployment22:41 TOI per game (16:10 at five-on-five · 3:37 PP · 2:00 PK)Scoring by situation, zone starts and workloadExplore

Usage by situation

Where the 11 points come from · All situations

Zone starts 31.7% offensive of OZ + DZ · 12th percentile

Shifts

Usage by situation

Special teamsPP · PK6.64 power-play points per 60Power play and penalty killExplore

Power play

Penalty kill

FormExplore

Rolling Radar

Splits1.25 points per game at home · 1.00 awayVenue, rest and opponentExplore

By period and score state

Linemates5v5Most often with MacKenzie Weegar: 124 five-on-five minutes, 62.9% xG share togetherWho he plays with at five-on-fiveExplore

PlayoffsNo playoff games yet this season · 105 career playoff gamesExplore

Every playoff run

Game log10 games · most recent vs PIT, W 5–4: 0 G, 1 AOfficial totals and five-on-five evidenceExplore

Career11 NHL seasons: 640 games, 380 pointsEvery season and a recomputed career lineExplore

Data notesScopes, missing values and model evidenceExplore

Every playoff run

Defensive metrics

Discipline & puck management

Penaltiesnet -2

Puck eventsnet -8

Power play

Penalty kill

Results vs expected

On ice vs off ice

Shot map

Shooting by zone

Shot profile

Shot types

Usage by situation

Where the 11 points come from · All situations

Zone starts 31.7% offensive of OZ + DZ · 12th percentile

Shifts

By period and score state

Season metrics

Season vs reference