Atlantic Division · Eastern2019–2044-14-12100 PTS
Elite goaltending and special teams, excellent defense, and very good offense and finishing — highlighted by 23.8 saves above expected (2nd of 31).
All situations · six composite axes against all 32 teams
Bands show league percentiles; axis labels show this season’s values.
Dashed outline: average NHL team this season. Outside = above average; inside = below average. All axes point outward for stronger results.
Team value: 3.02
League range: 2.41 – 3.32 / game
Team 3.02 · mean 2.93. Higher raw values rank higher.
Expected goals for per game.
All situations · against all 32 teams
| Results | Team | Percentile | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 56.6 | 1 / 31 |
Team value: 56.61
League range: 35.19 – 56.61 %
Team 56.61 · mean 49.96. Higher raw values rank higher.
Goals for divided by goals for plus against.
| Shot share | Team | Percentile | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 52.6 | 6 / 31 | ||
| 51.1 | 11 / 31 | ||
| 51.2 | 9 / 31 | ||
| 51.7 | 8 / 31 | ||
| 47.8 | 25 / 31 |
Team value: 52.55
League range: 42.66 – 54.50 %
Team 52.55 · mean 50.01. Higher raw values rank higher.
Expected goals for divided by expected goals for plus against, raw model values.
| Chance volume | Team | Percentile | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3.02 | 8 / 31 | ||
| 56.93 | 15 / 31 | ||
| 1.57 | 19 / 31 |
Team value: 3.02
League range: 2.41 – 3.32 / game
Team 3.02 · mean 2.93. Higher raw values rank higher.
Expected goals for per game.
| Finishing & goaltending | Team | Percentile | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10.1 | 12 / 31 | ||
| 92.1 | 1 / 31 | ||
| 102.16 | 2 / 31 | ||
| 15.46 | 9 / 31 | ||
| 23.82 | 2 / 31 |
Above averageNear averageBelow averageBars and shaded cells show peer percentile, so more is always better · tick at the 50th
Team value: 10.10
League range: 7.38 – 11.17 %
Team 10.10 · mean 9.48. Higher raw values rank higher.
Goals divided by shots on goal.
All situations · this season against a reference
| Metric | This season | League avg | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| % | 71.4 | 55.8 | +15.6 |
| / GP | 3.24 | 3.02 | +0.22 |
| / GP | 2.49 | 3.02 | -0.53 |
| / GP | 0.76 | 0.00 | +0.76 |
| / GP | 3.02 | 2.93 | +0.09 |
| / GP | 2.73 | 2.93 | -0.20 |
| % | 52.6 | 50.0 | +2.5 |
| % | 51.1 | 50.0 | +1.1 |
| % | 47.8 | 50.0 | -2.2 |
| % | 10.1 | 9.5 | +0.6 |
| % | 92.1 | 90.5 | +1.5 |
| index | 102.16 | 100.00 | +2.16 |
| goals | 15.46 | 2.86 | +12.60 |
| goals | 23.82 | -2.13 | +25.95 |
Cumulative standings points by game against a 96-point pace over 71 games
Oct 3, 2019 · at DAL
100 points after 70 games; the pace line expects 94.6 (+5.4).
W-L-OTL and points % · overtime and shootout losses earn one point
| Split | GP | W-L-OTL | PTS | P% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home | 35 | 22-4-9 | 53 | 75.7 |
| Away | 35 | 22-10-3 | 47 | 67.1 |
| vs Eastern | 44 | 26-9-9 | 61 | 69.3 |
| vs Western | 26 | 18-5-3 | 39 | 75.0 |
| vs own division | 23 | 14-6-3 | 31 | 67.4 |
| One-goal games | 34 | 18-4-12 | 48 | 70.6 |
| Scoring first | 41 | 26-7-8 | 60 | 73.2 |
| Allowing first | 29 | 18-7-4 | 40 | 69.0 |
| Last 10 | 10 | 7-3-0 | 14 | 70.0 |
All situations · goals and expected goals per 60 of clocked team ice time · all 32 teams
Per-60 rates pending: team ice time covers under 90% of games.
Season totals; Other is all situations minus 5v5, PP and PK, so rows sum to all situations.
| Situation | TOI / GP | GF | GA | xGF | xGA | xG diff | xGF% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Five-on-five | — | 141 | 105 | 135.3 | 126.2 | +9.1 | 51.7 |
| Power play | — | 55 | 7 | 42.1 | 8.5 | +33.6 | 83.2 |
| Penalty kill | — | 9 | 35 | 9.4 | 35.4 | -26.0 | 21.0 |
| Other | — | 22 | 27 | 24.8 | 20.9 | +3.8 | 54.2 |
| All situations | — | 227 | 174 | 211.5 | 191.0 | +20.5 | 52.6 |
Goals for and against · a shootout decider counts as an overtime goal
Loading…
All situations · lower against rates rank higher
| Suppression & events | Team | Percentile | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.065 | 7 / 31 | ||
| 2.73 | 5 / 31 | ||
| 1.71 | T18 / 31 | ||
| 54.54 | 9 / 31 | ||
| 12.73 | 25 / 31 | ||
| 23.56 | 8 / 31 | ||
| 7.51 | 15 / 31 | ||
| 9.99 | 16 / 31 |
Team value: 0.07
League range: 0.06 – 0.08 xG / unblocked attempt
Team 0.07 · mean 0.07. Lower raw values are better.
Expected goals against divided by unblocked attempts against: the average quality of chances allowed.
All situations · goals saved above expected per goalie · empty-net goals excluded
| Goalie | GP | GS | Start share | W-L-OTL | SV% | xGA | GSAx |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tuukka Rask | 41 | 41 | 58.6% | 26-8-6 | 0.929 | 100.9 | +15.9 |
| Jaroslav Halak | 31 | 29 | 41.4% | 18-6-6 | 0.919 | 80.9 | +7.9 |
| Team | 70 | — | +23.8 |
Team saves above expected +23.8 (2nd in NHL); the goalie rows sum to it.
Official counts · all situations
Official percentage · rates use our scope, including 5v3, 4v3 and 6v4
| Power play rates | Team | Percentile | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12.87 | 5 / 31 |
Team value: 12.87
League range: -11.90 – 16.21 goals
Team 12.87 · mean 3.01. Higher raw values rank higher.
Goals for minus expected goals for in this situation.
Per-60 rates pending: team ice time covers under 90% of games.
Official percentage · rates use our scope, including 5v3, 4v3 and 6v4
| Penalty kill rates | Team | Percentile | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| -0.39 | 9 / 31 |
Team value: -0.39
League range: -10.27 – 13.13 goals
Team -0.39 · mean 3.01. Lower raw values are better.
Goals against minus expected goals against in this situation.
Per-60 rates pending: team ice time covers under 90% of games.
10-game pooled xG share · goal differential by game, colored by result
Latest 10-game xG share 50.7%. Hover a bar for the game.
Win OT/SO loss Regulation loss
Regular-season games only.
This club’s games only · P/60 and 5v5 xG share use this stint; grade is the full season
| Games | Scoring | Discipline | Shots | Time | Model | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | Player | Pos | GP | G | A | P | +/− | PIM | SOG | S% | ATOI | P/60 | 5v5 xG% | Grade |
| 88 |  David Pastrnak | R | 70 | 48 | 47 | 95 | +21 | 40 | 279 | 17.2% | 18:58 | 4.29 | 53.7 | — |
| 63 |  Brad Marchand | L | 70 | 28 | 59 | 87 | +25 | 82 | 185 | 15.1% | 19:27 | 3.83 | 56.7 | — |
| 37 |  Patrice Bergeron | C | 61 | 31 | 25 | 56 | +23 | 28 | 203 | 15.3% | 18:44 | 2.94 | 57.2 | — |
| 47 |  Torey Krug | D | 61 | 9 | 40 | 49 | -4 | 33 | 144 | 6.3% | 20:29 | 2.35 | 53.3 | — |
| 46 |  David Krejci | C | 61 | 13 | 30 | 43 | +14 | 23 | 83 | 15.7% | 17:10 | 2.46 | 50.6 | — |
| 13 |  Charlie Coyle | C | 70 | 16 | 21 | 37 | +9 | 21 | 145 | 11.0% | 16:47 | 1.89 | 53.9 | — |
| 74 |  Jake DeBrusk | L | 65 | 19 | 16 | 35 | -1 | 14 | 161 | 11.8% | 16:03 | 2.01 | 52.3 | — |
| 73 |  Charlie McAvoy | D | 67 | 5 | 27 | 32 | +24 | 41 | 101 | 5.0% | 23:10 | 1.24 | 54.3 | — |
| 52 |  Sean Kuraly | C | 69 | 6 | 17 | 23 | -2 | 34 | 95 | 6.3% | 13:17 | 1.50 | 42.8 | — |
| 43 |  Danton Heinen | L | 58 | 7 | 15 | 22 | +3 | 8 | 90 | 7.8% | 14:11 | 1.61 | 51.3 | — |
| 48 |  Matt Grzelcyk | D | 68 | 4 | 17 | 21 | +15 | 34 | 112 | 3.6% | 18:04 | 1.03 | 55.8 | — |
| 10 |  Anders Bjork | L | 58 | 9 | 10 | 19 | +5 | 10 | 66 | 13.6% | 12:56 | 1.52 | 51.8 | — |
| 25 |  Brandon Carlo | D | 67 | 4 | 15 | 19 | +16 | 33 | 111 | 3.6% | 20:29 | 0.83 | 49.4 | — |
| 33 |  Zdeno Chara | D | 68 | 5 | 9 | 14 | +26 | 60 | 86 | 5.8% | 21:01 | 0.59 | 47.8 | — |
| 14 |  Chris Wagner | R | 67 | 6 | 4 | 10 | -8 | 47 | 78 | 7.7% | 12:26 | 0.72 | 46.5 | — |
| 20 |  Joakim Nordstrom | C | 48 | 4 | 3 | 7 | -6 | 17 | 49 | 8.2% | 12:06 | 0.72 | 41.4 | — |
| 18 |  Brett Ritchie | R | 27 | 2 | 4 | 6 | -3 | 21 | 34 | 5.9% | 10:24 | 1.28 | 46.1 | — |
| 83 |  Karson Kuhlman | C | 25 | 1 | 5 | 6 | +3 | 13 | 45 | 2.2% | 12:32 | 1.15 | 56.6 | — |
| 26 |  Par Lindholm | C | 40 | 3 | 3 | 6 | +6 | 4 | 35 | 8.6% | 11:15 | 0.80 | 57.6 | — |
| 27 |  John Moore | D | 24 | 2 | 1 | 3 | -2 | 11 | 33 | 6.1% | 16:33 | 0.45 | 53.4 | — |
| 75 |  Connor Clifton | D | 31 | 2 | 0 | 2 | +4 | 12 | 20 | 10.0% | 14:25 | 0.27 | 44.3 | — |
GSAx: goals saved above expected, all situations, empty-net goals excluded.
| Games | Record | Shots faced | Goals allowed | Model | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | Goalie | GP | GS | W | L | OTL | SA | SV% | GA | GAA | GSAx |
| 40 |  Tuukka Rask | 41 | 41 | 26 | 8 | 6 | 1189 | .929 | 85 | 2.12 | +15.9 |
| 41 |  Jaroslav Halak | 31 | 29 | 18 | 6 | 6 | 905 | .919 | 73 | 2.39 | +7.9 |
Playoff games only · no league ranks, since too few clubs play for a fair comparison
| Round | Opponent | Result | Games |
|---|---|---|---|
| Qualifying round | PHI | Won 0–1 | 1 |
| Qualifying round | TBL | Won 0–1 | 1 |
| Qualifying round | WSH | Won 0–1 | 1 |
| Round 1 | CAR | Won 4–1 | 5 |
| Round 2 | TBL | Lost 1–4 | 5 |
| Player | GP | G | A | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brad Marchand | 13 | 7 | 5 | 12 |
| David Krejci | 13 | 4 | 8 | 12 |
| David Pastrnak | 10 | 3 | 7 | 10 |
| Patrice Bergeron | 13 | 2 | 6 | 8 |
| Torey Krug | 13 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Charlie Coyle | 13 | 3 | 2 | 5 |
| Goalie | GP | W-L | SV% | GAA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jaroslav Halak | 9 | 4-5 | .902 | 2.76 |
| Tuukka Rask | 4 | 1-3 | .904 | 2.57 |
| Dan Vladar | 1 | 0-0 | .800 | 6.27 |
2019–20 · playoffs · every finished game
| Date | Opponent | Score | Result | SOG | SA | Shot diff | xGF% | PP | Starting goalie |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 31 | @ TBL | 2–3 | L (OT) | 47 | 35 | +12 | 49.0 | — | Jaroslav Halak |
| Aug 29 | vs TBL | 1–3 | L | 30 | 26 | +4 | 55.4 | — | Jaroslav Halak |
| Aug 26 | vs TBL | 1–7 | L | 24 | 31 | -7 | 42.7 | — | Jaroslav Halak |
| Aug 25 | @ TBL | 3–4 | L (OT) | 25 | 40 | -15 | 34.4 | — | Jaroslav Halak |
| Aug 23 | @ TBL | 3–2 | W | 31 | 37 | -6 | 47.7 | — | Jaroslav Halak |
| Aug 19 | vs CAR | 2–1 | W | 27 | 24 | +3 | 42.3 | — | Jaroslav Halak |
| Aug 17 | @ CAR | 4–3 | W | 33 | 19 | +14 | 77.4 | — | Jaroslav Halak |
| Aug 15 | @ CAR | 3–1 | W | 39 | 30 | +9 | 65.8 | — | Jaroslav Halak |
| Aug 13 | vs CAR | 2–3 | L | 35 | 26 | +9 | 45.8 | — | Tuukka Rask |
| Aug 12 | vs CAR | 4–3 | W (OT) | 40 | 28 | +12 | 55.1 | — | Tuukka Rask |
| Aug 9 | @ WSH | 1–2 | L | 31 | 25 | +6 | 50.3 | — | Tuukka Rask |
| Aug 5 | vs TBL | 2–3 | L | 27 | 35 | -8 | 40.8 | — | Tuukka Rask |
| Aug 2 | vs PHI | 1–4 | L | 35 | 29 | +6 | 61.7 | — | Jaroslav Halak |
| 13 games | 5-8 | 32.6 | 29.6 | 3.0 | 51.2 | — | |||
Summary: record, average SOG and SA per game, pooled xG share and power-play total for the filtered games.
2019–20 · regular season · every finished game
| Date | Opponent | Score | Result | SOG | SA | Shot diff | xGF% | PP | Starting goalie |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 10 | @ PHI | 2–0 | W | 29 | 36 | -7 | 51.9 | 1/3 | Tuukka Rask |
| Mar 7 | vs TBL | 3–5 | L | 38 | 25 | +13 | 61.3 | 1/4 | Tuukka Rask |
| Mar 5 | @ FLA | 2–1 | W (OT) | 28 | 33 | -5 | 41.6 | 1/4 | Jaroslav Halak |
| Mar 3 | @ TBL | 2–1 | W | 35 | 21 | +14 | 57.3 | 0/3 | Tuukka Rask |
| Feb 29 | @ NYI | 4–0 | W | 30 | 25 | +5 | 48.7 | 1/3 | Tuukka Rask |
| Feb 27 | vs DAL | 4–3 | W | 28 | 34 | -6 | 53.7 | 1/2 | Jaroslav Halak |
| Feb 25 | vs CGY | 2–5 | L | 28 | 31 | -3 | 43.1 | 0/1 | Tuukka Rask |
| Feb 22 | @ VAN | 3–9 | L | 37 | 35 | +2 | 37.0 | 1/2 | Tuukka Rask |
| Feb 21 | @ CGY | 4–3 | W | 23 | 21 | +2 | 51.9 | 0/0 | Jaroslav Halak |
| Feb 19 | @ EDM | 2–1 | W (OT) | 34 | 29 | +5 | 58.8 | 0/7 | Tuukka Rask |
| Feb 16 | @ NYR | 3–1 | W | 34 | 26 | +8 | 54.5 | 0/2 | Jaroslav Halak |
| Feb 15 | vs DET | 4–1 | W | 41 | 26 | +15 | 63.9 | 0/2 | Tuukka Rask |
| Feb 12 | vs MTL | 4–1 | W | 38 | 29 | +9 | 55.0 | 1/3 | Tuukka Rask |
| Feb 9 | @ DET | 1–3 | L | 40 | 20 | +20 | 53.7 | 0/4 | Tuukka Rask |
| Feb 8 | vs ARI | 4–2 | W | 33 | 31 | +2 | 56.8 | 2/4 | Tuukka Rask |
| Feb 5 | @ CHI | 2–1 | W (OT) | 40 | 22 | +18 | 59.8 | 0/3 | Jaroslav Halak |
| Feb 4 | vs VAN | 4–0 | W | 42 | 25 | +17 | 74.4 | 1/6 | Tuukka Rask |
| Feb 1 | @ MIN | 6–1 | W | 34 | 26 | +8 | 68.3 | 3/4 | Jaroslav Halak |
| Jan 31 | @ WPG | 2–1 | W | 25 | 38 | -13 | 36.3 | 2/4 | Tuukka Rask |
| Jan 21 | vs VGK | 3–2 | W | 37 | 29 | +8 | 59.3 | 0/5 | Jaroslav Halak |
| Jan 19 | @ PIT | 3–4 | L | 38 | 22 | +16 | 60.9 | 0/2 | Jaroslav Halak |
| Jan 16 | vs PIT | 4–1 | W | 30 | 30 | 0 | 55.4 | 0/4 | Jaroslav Halak |
| Jan 14 | @ CBJ | 0–3 | L | 34 | 27 | +7 | 59.9 | 0/4 | Tuukka Rask |
| Jan 13 | @ PHI | 5–6 | OTL (SO) | 31 | 39 | -8 | 48.6 | 1/2 | Jaroslav Halak |
| Jan 11 | @ NYI | 3–2 | W (OT) | 33 | 37 | -4 | 43.4 | 1/2 | Tuukka Rask |
| Jan 9 | vs WPG | 5–4 | W | 36 | 21 | +15 | 75.8 | 1/4 | Jaroslav Halak |
| Jan 7 | @ NSH | 6–2 | W | 36 | 35 | +1 | 57.9 | 1/3 | Tuukka Rask |
| Jan 4 | vs EDM | 1–4 | L | 36 | 26 | +10 | 45.5 | 1/3 | Jaroslav Halak |
| Jan 2 | vs CBJ | 1–2 | OTL (OT) | 26 | 33 | -7 | 48.8 | 1/2 | Tuukka Rask |
| Dec 31 | @ NJD | 2–3 | OTL (SO) | 30 | 44 | -14 | 37.1 | 1/3 | Jaroslav Halak |
| Dec 29 | vs BUF | 3–2 | W | 22 | 26 | -4 | 55.3 | 2/6 | Tuukka Rask |
| Dec 27 | @ BUF | 3–0 | W | 25 | 26 | -1 | 54.1 | 1/4 | Jaroslav Halak |
| Dec 23 | vs WSH | 7–3 | W | 17 | 42 | -25 | 61.1 | 2/6 | Tuukka Rask |
| Dec 21 | vs NSH | 3–4 | OTL (OT) | 32 | 29 | +3 | 47.3 | 1/4 | Jaroslav Halak |
| Dec 19 | vs NYI | 2–3 | OTL (SO) | 29 | 21 | +8 | 54.5 | 1/5 | Tuukka Rask |
| Dec 17 | vs LAK | 3–4 | OTL (OT) | 40 | 27 | +13 | 72.5 | 1/3 | Tuukka Rask |
| Dec 14 | @ FLA | 4–2 | W | 42 | 33 | +9 | 69.7 | 1/3 | Jaroslav Halak |
| Dec 12 | @ TBL | 2–3 | L | 29 | 31 | -2 | 42.4 | 0/2 | Tuukka Rask |
| Dec 11 | @ WSH | 2–3 | L | 32 | 25 | +7 | 49.8 | 0/5 | Jaroslav Halak |
| Dec 9 | @ OTT | 2–5 | L | 40 | 28 | +12 | 44.6 | 1/5 | Tuukka Rask |
| Dec 7 | vs COL | 1–4 | L | 20 | 20 | 0 | 48.6 | 0/3 | Jaroslav Halak |
| Dec 5 | vs CHI | 3–4 | OTL (OT) | 40 | 31 | +9 | 49.6 | 0/4 | Tuukka Rask |
| Dec 3 | vs CAR | 2–0 | W | 34 | 24 | +10 | 52.9 | 0/2 | Jaroslav Halak |
| Dec 1 | vs MTL | 3–1 | W | 34 | 29 | +5 | 49.7 | 1/3 | Tuukka Rask |
| Nov 29 | vs NYR | 3–2 | W (OT) | 27 | 28 | -1 | 45.7 | 0/1 | Jaroslav Halak |
| Nov 27 | @ OTT | 2–1 | W | 21 | 34 | -13 | 33.9 | 0/2 | Tuukka Rask |
| Nov 26 | @ MTL | 8–1 | W | 24 | 37 | -13 | 46.3 | 2/2 | Jaroslav Halak |
| Nov 23 | vs MIN | 5–4 | W (OT) | 39 | 36 | +3 | 49.1 | 1/3 | Tuukka Rask |
| Nov 21 | vs BUF | 3–2 | W | 27 | 38 | -11 | 44.9 | 2/2 | Tuukka Rask |
| Nov 19 | @ NJD | 5–1 | W | 28 | 26 | +2 | 54.1 | 1/2 | Tuukka Rask |
| Nov 16 | vs WSH | 2–3 | OTL (SO) | 23 | 44 | -21 | 35.3 | 0/3 | Jaroslav Halak |
| Nov 15 | @ TOR | 4–2 | W | 34 | 31 | +3 | 63.9 | 0/2 | Tuukka Rask |
| Nov 12 | vs FLA | 4–5 | OTL (SO) | 38 | 29 | +9 | 60.4 | 1/2 | Tuukka Rask |
| Nov 10 | vs PHI | 2–3 | OTL (SO) | 28 | 29 | -1 | 59.2 | 0/2 | Jaroslav Halak |
| Nov 8 | @ DET | 2–4 | L | 28 | 32 | -4 | 41.9 | 1/4 | Tuukka Rask |
| Nov 5 | @ MTL | 4–5 | L | 25 | 31 | -6 | 48.5 | 1/2 | Tuukka Rask |
| Nov 4 | vs PIT | 6–4 | W | 26 | 44 | -18 | 43.8 | 0/3 | Jaroslav Halak |
| Nov 2 | vs OTT | 5–2 | W | 32 | 32 | 0 | 54.6 | 2/4 | Tuukka Rask |
| Oct 29 | vs SJS | 5–1 | W | 41 | 17 | +24 | 66.7 | 2/8 | Tuukka Rask |
| Oct 27 | @ NYR | 7–4 | W | 43 | 29 | +14 | 62.8 | 0/2 | Jaroslav Halak |
| Oct 26 | vs STL | 3–0 | W | 24 | 26 | -2 | 62.7 | 1/4 | Tuukka Rask |
| Oct 22 | vs TOR | 4–2 | W | 39 | 30 | +9 | 70.3 | 1/4 | Tuukka Rask |
| Oct 19 | @ TOR | 3–4 | OTL (OT) | 46 | 29 | +17 | 58.0 | 1/3 | Jaroslav Halak |
| Oct 17 | vs TBL | 3–4 | OTL (SO) | 37 | 36 | +1 | 44.6 | 3/5 | Tuukka Rask |
| Oct 14 | vs ANA | 4–2 | W | 23 | 32 | -9 | 43.0 | 2/3 | Jaroslav Halak |
| Oct 12 | vs NJD | 3–0 | W | 32 | 31 | +1 | 54.1 | 1/3 | Tuukka Rask |
| Oct 10 | @ COL | 2–4 | L | 41 | 36 | +5 | 39.1 | 0/1 | Jaroslav Halak |
| Oct 8 | @ VGK | 4–3 | W | 35 | 34 | +1 | 50.8 | 1/3 | Tuukka Rask |
| Oct 5 | @ ARI | 1–0 | W | 26 | 35 | -9 | 42.9 | 0/2 | Jaroslav Halak |
| Oct 3 | @ DAL | 2–1 | W | 20 | 29 | -9 | 41.2 | 1/4 | Tuukka Rask |
| 70 games | 44-14-12 | 32.1 | 30.0 | 2.1 | 52.6 | 57/226 | |||
Summary: record, average SOG and SA per game, pooled xG share and power-play total for the filtered games.
Loading…
Every metric name opens its definition; the full list lives in Metrics.
Every section reads one season sample per situation. Five-on-five is official five-on-five strength; power play and penalty kill include 5v3, 4v3 and 6v4, and plain 6v5 is Other. Other is all situations minus the three, so situation rows sum. Power play and penalty kill are read from this team’s side, so shots against on the power play are the opponent’s shorthanded chances.
The situation filter (all situations or five-on-five) sets Season metrics, Season vs reference, On-ice rates and the Defense suppression rows, and opens the shot map on the same choice; the shot map’s own Situation select adds power play and penalty kill. The header, the percentile radar, Results, goaltending, discipline, Special teams, Form, Roster, Game log and Seasons keep the scope their own labels state.
Team ice time is the elapsed team clock from shift charts. Per-60 rates use only games with a complete clock and appear when at least 90% of games have one. Power-play opportunities, times shorthanded, penalty minutes, hits, blocks, giveaways, takeaways and faceoffs are official team box counts from the NHL game summary; official PP% and PK% use them.
Goals and saves above expected exclude empty-net goals. Shot-type shooting percentage is goals divided by shots on goal. High danger in ranked rows is model scoring probability of at least 0.20; the shot-map tier filter uses the player page’s location tiers. PDO is ranked high to low but is context, not a quality grade.
One-goal games include overtime and shootout decisions, and scoring first uses the first non-shootout goal. Shot callouts exclude shots on an empty net; attempts are unblocked, because blocked shots carry no location. Blocks and hits describe volume and time defending, so they are ranked but colored as context. Penalties count minor, major, bench and match events; misconducts and penalty shots are excluded.
Special-teams rates, shorthanded goals and net goals use the widened scopes above, which can differ from the official counts by a goal or two over a season. In Season vs reference, a change is colored by whether it helps the team, and Points % appears only in all situations. Season metrics leaves out the rows the Defense table shows and, in all situations, the rows the header shows.
An em dash means unavailable, not zero. A partial season remains partial. Percentiles and ranks need at least 20 teams.
Explore the full methodology →Unblocked attempts for and against · rinks use the player page’s geometric chance tiers
214 goals on 198.6 xG (+15.4). Finishing 7.0% vs 6.5% expected per unblocked attempt.
158 goals allowed on 181.8 xG against (+23.8 saved above expected).
| Zone | For | Against | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Att | xG | G | Att | xG | G | |
| Point | 1032 | 26.0 | 31 | 1072 | 25.6 | 21 |
| High slot | 935 | 92.2 | 77 | 849 | 83.6 | 67 |
| Inner slot | 473 | 64.6 | 89 | 456 | 61.2 | 56 |
| Outer slot | 222 | 16.5 | 11 | 159 | 10.6 | 12 |
| Right circle | 205 | 5.9 | 7 | 190 | 5.2 | 8 |
| Left circle | 194 | 6.2 | 12 | 189 | 4.6 | 3 |
| Below goal line | 7 | 0.2 | 0 | 12 | 0.3 | 0 |
| All zones | 3068 | 211.6 | 227 | 2927 | 191.0 | 167 |
| Type | Att | Share | G | xG | Sh% | G−xG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wrist | 1686 | 55.0% | 118 | 117.7 | 9.2 | +0.3 |
| Slap | 494 | 16.1% | 36 | 21.1 | 9.8 | +14.9 |
| Snap | 405 | 13.2% | 29 | 31.4 | 9.9 | -2.4 |
| Backhand | 190 | 6.2% | 14 | 16.3 | 9.7 | -2.3 |
| Tip-in | 164 | 5.3% | 18 | 13.0 | 21.4 | +5.0 |
| Deflected | 109 | 3.6% | 11 | 10.7 | 19.6 | +0.3 |
| Wrap-around | 20 | 0.7% | 1 | 1.3 | 5.9 | -0.3 |
Official record and season-level team metrics · cells shaded by league percentile that season
| Season | GP | Record | PTS | GF | GA | Diff | P% | xGF% | CF% | GAx | PDO | PP% | PK% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026–27 partial | 9 | 7-2-0 | 14 | 34 | 19 | +15 | 77.8 | 49.2 | 47.1 | 6.5 | 107.4 | 25.0 | 81.3 |
| 2025–26 | 82 | 45-27-10 | 100 | 272 | 250 | +22 | 61.0 | 47.7 | 48.5 | 16.8 ★ | 102.0 | 23.4 | 77.0 |
| 2024–25 | 82 | 33-39-10 | 76 | 222 | 272 | -50 | 46.3 | 48.3 | 48.3 | -19.1 | 98.7 | 15.2 | 76.3 |
| 2023–24 | 82 | 47-20-15 | 109 | 267 | 224 | +43 | 66.5 | 50.5 | 47.5 | 2.0 | 102.1 | 22.2 | 82.5 |
| 2022–23 | 82 | 65-12-5 | 135 | 305 | 177 | +128 | 82.3 ★ | 55.8 ★ | 51.4 | -9.4 | 104.0 ★ | 22.2 | 87.3 ★ |
| 2021–22 | 82 | 51-26-5 | 107 | 255 | 220 | +35 | 65.2 | 55.2 | 53.4 | -19.9 | 99.3 | 21.2 | 81.3 |
| 2020–21 | 56 | 33-16-7 | 73 | 168 | 136 | +32 | 65.2 | 53.3 | 53.7 ★ | 4.7 | 99.9 | 21.9 | 86.0 |
| 2019–20 | 70 | 44-14-12 | 100 | 227 | 174 | +53 | 71.4 | 52.6 | 51.1 | 15.5 | 102.2 | 25.2 ★ | 84.3 |
★ best full season in the table for that column (PDO is context). Shading uses each season’s league percentile; the in-progress season is partial.
