Central Division · Western2016–1750-23-9109 PTS
Elite offense with excellent goaltending are the lone bright spots, as they struggle with special teams, defense, and finishing — -12.0 special-teams goal differential (24th of 30).
All situations · six composite axes against all 32 teams
Bands show league percentiles; axis labels show this season’s values.
Dashed outline: average NHL team this season. Outside = above average; inside = below average. All axes point outward for stronger results.
Team value: 3.16
League range: 2.28 – 3.45 / game
Team 3.16 · mean 2.84. Higher raw values rank higher.
Expected goals for per game.
All situations · against all 32 teams
| Results | Team | Percentile | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 53.4 | 7 / 30 |
Team value: 53.39
League range: 37.39 – 59.10 %
Team 53.39 · mean 49.95. Higher raw values rank higher.
Goals for divided by goals for plus against.
| Shot share | Team | Percentile | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 51.7 | 9 / 30 | ||
| 49.9 | 15 / 30 | ||
| 49.4 | 21 / 30 | ||
| 49.4 | 22 / 30 | ||
| 51.6 | 13 / 30 |
Team value: 51.68
League range: 41.48 – 54.99 %
Team 51.68 · mean 49.96. Higher raw values rank higher.
Expected goals for divided by expected goals for plus against, raw model values.
| Chance volume | Team | Percentile | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3.16 | 4 / 30 | ||
| 56.50 | 14 / 30 | ||
| 2.21 | 5 / 30 |
Team value: 3.16
League range: 2.28 – 3.45 / game
Team 3.16 · mean 2.84. Higher raw values rank higher.
Expected goals for per game.
| Finishing & goaltending | Team | Percentile | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 9.6 | 9 / 30 | ||
| 91.8 | 6 / 30 | ||
| 101.33 | 6 / 30 | ||
| -22.10 | 20 / 30 | ||
| 30.47 | 6 / 30 |
Above averageNear averageBelow averageBars and shaded cells show peer percentile, so more is always better · tick at the 50th
Team value: 9.57
League range: 7.16 – 10.46 %
Team 9.57 · mean 9.00. Higher raw values rank higher.
Goals divided by shots on goal.
All situations · this season against a reference
| Metric | This season | League avg | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| % | 66.5 | 55.9 | +10.6 |
| / GP | 2.98 | 2.77 | +0.21 |
| / GP | 2.60 | 2.77 | -0.17 |
| / GP | 0.38 | 0.00 | +0.38 |
| / GP | 3.16 | 2.84 | +0.33 |
| / GP | 2.96 | 2.84 | +0.12 |
| % | 51.7 | 50.0 | +1.7 |
| % | 49.9 | 50.0 | -0.1 |
| % | 51.6 | 49.7 | +1.9 |
| % | 9.6 | 9.0 | +0.6 |
| % | 91.8 | 91.0 | +0.8 |
| index | 101.33 | 99.98 | +1.35 |
| goals | -22.10 | -10.87 | -11.24 |
| goals | 30.47 | 10.56 | +19.91 |
Cumulative standings points by game against a 96-point pace over 82 games
Oct 12, 2016 · vs STL
109 points after 82 games; the pace line expects 96.0 (+13.0).
W-L-OTL and points % · overtime and shootout losses earn one point
| Split | GP | W-L-OTL | PTS | P% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home | 41 | 26-10-5 | 57 | 69.5 |
| Away | 41 | 24-13-4 | 52 | 63.4 |
| vs Eastern | 32 | 20-9-3 | 43 | 67.2 |
| vs Western | 50 | 30-14-6 | 66 | 66.0 |
| vs own division | 29 | 19-8-2 | 40 | 69.0 |
| One-goal games | 42 | 24-9-9 | 57 | 67.9 |
| Scoring first | 50 | 37-8-5 | 79 | 79.0 |
| Allowing first | 32 | 13-15-4 | 30 | 46.9 |
| Last 10 | 10 | 3-3-4 | 10 | 50.0 |
All situations · goals and expected goals per 60 of clocked team ice time · all 32 teams
Per-60 rates pending: team ice time covers under 90% of games.
Season totals; Other is all situations minus 5v5, PP and PK, so rows sum to all situations.
| Situation | TOI / GP | GF | GA | xGF | xGA | xG diff | xGF% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Five-on-five | — | 164 | 138 | 182.3 | 174.9 | +7.3 | 51.0 |
| Power play | — | 40 | 7 | 45.0 | 4.8 | +40.3 | 90.4 |
| Penalty kill | — | 2 | 47 | 4.1 | 43.5 | -39.5 | 8.5 |
| Other | — | 38 | 21 | 28.1 | 19.4 | +8.7 | 59.2 |
| All situations | — | 244 | 213 | 259.4 | 242.6 | +16.9 | 51.7 |
Goals for and against · a shootout decider counts as an overtime goal
Loading…
All situations · lower against rates rank higher
| Suppression & events | Team | Percentile | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.071 | 25 / 30 | ||
| 2.96 | 22 / 30 | ||
| 2.07 | 26 / 30 | ||
| 56.74 | 21 / 30 | ||
| 14.95 | 9 / 30 | ||
| 14.37 | 30 / 30 | ||
| 7.33 | 10 / 30 | ||
| 9.46 | 18 / 30 |
Team value: 0.07
League range: 0.06 – 0.07 xG / unblocked attempt
Team 0.07 · mean 0.07. Lower raw values are better.
Expected goals against divided by unblocked attempts against: the average quality of chances allowed.
All situations · goals saved above expected per goalie · empty-net goals excluded
| Goalie | GP | GS | Start share | W-L-OTL | SV% | xGA | GSAx |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Corey Crawford | 55 | 55 | 67.1% | 32-18-4 | 0.918 | 154.3 | +16.3 |
| Scott Darling | 32 | 27 | 32.9% | 18-5-5 | 0.924 | 81.1 | +14.1 |
| Team | 82 | — | +30.5 |
Team saves above expected +30.5 (6th in NHL); the goalie rows sum to it.
Official counts · all situations
Official percentage · rates use our scope, including 5v3, 4v3 and 6v4
| Power play rates | Team | Percentile | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| -5.02 | 26 / 30 |
Team value: -5.02
League range: -10.86 – 15.44 goals
Team -5.02 · mean 1.73. Higher raw values rank higher.
Goals for minus expected goals for in this situation.
Per-60 rates pending: team ice time covers under 90% of games.
Official percentage · rates use our scope, including 5v3, 4v3 and 6v4
| Penalty kill rates | Team | Percentile | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3.49 | 19 / 30 |
Team value: 3.49
League range: -16.38 – 20.45 goals
Team 3.49 · mean 1.73. Lower raw values are better.
Goals against minus expected goals against in this situation.
Per-60 rates pending: team ice time covers under 90% of games.
10-game pooled xG share · goal differential by game, colored by result
Latest 10-game xG share 53.6%. Hover a bar for the game.
Win OT/SO loss Regulation loss
Regular-season games only.
This club’s games only · P/60 and 5v5 xG share use this stint; grade is the full season
| Games | Scoring | Discipline | Shots | Time | Model | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | Player | Pos | GP | G | A | P | +/− | PIM | SOG | S% | ATOI | P/60 | 5v5 xG% | Grade |
| 88 |  Patrick Kane | R | 82 | 34 | 55 | 89 | +11 | 32 | 292 | 11.6% | 21:24 | 3.04 | 49.4 | — |
| 72 |  Artemi Panarin | L | 82 | 31 | 43 | 74 | +18 | 21 | 211 | 14.7% | 19:28 | 2.78 | 51.9 | — |
| 19 |  Jonathan Toews | C | 72 | 21 | 37 | 58 | +7 | 35 | 199 | 10.6% | 20:09 | 2.40 | 50.2 | — |
| 2 |  Duncan Keith | D | 80 | 6 | 47 | 53 | +22 | 16 | 183 | 3.3% | 25:37 | 1.55 | 50.1 | — |
| 81 |  Marian Hossa | R | 73 | 26 | 19 | 45 | +7 | 8 | 167 | 15.6% | 16:51 | 2.19 | 50.4 | — |
| 15 |  Artem Anisimov | C | 64 | 22 | 23 | 45 | +9 | 30 | 105 | 21.0% | 17:51 | 2.36 | 48.6 | — |
| 14 |  Richard Panik | R | 82 | 22 | 22 | 44 | +14 | 58 | 155 | 14.2% | 14:44 | 2.19 | 50.7 | — |
| 7 |  Brent Seabrook | D | 79 | 3 | 36 | 39 | +5 | 26 | 131 | 2.3% | 21:54 | 1.35 | 48.7 | — |
| 38 |  Ryan Hartman | R | 76 | 19 | 12 | 31 | +13 | 70 | 170 | 11.2% | 12:46 | 1.92 | 54.4 | — |
| 8 |  Nick Schmaltz | C | 61 | 6 | 22 | 28 | +10 | 6 | 66 | 9.1% | 13:16 | 2.08 | 49.1 | — |
| 4 |  Niklas Hjalmarsson | D | 73 | 5 | 13 | 18 | +12 | 20 | 61 | 8.2% | 21:30 | 0.69 | 51.4 | — |
| 51 |  Brian Campbell | D | 80 | 5 | 12 | 17 | +12 | 24 | 74 | 6.8% | 18:26 | 0.69 | 49.9 | — |
| 16 |  Marcus Kruger | C | 70 | 5 | 12 | 17 | +7 | 34 | 83 | 6.0% | 14:01 | 1.04 | 53.1 | — |
| 57 |  Trevor van Riemsdyk | D | 58 | 5 | 11 | 16 | +17 | 29 | 73 | 6.8% | 18:25 | 0.90 | 54.2 | — |
| 67 |  Tanner Kero | C | 47 | 6 | 10 | 16 | +15 | 8 | 60 | 10.0% | 13:29 | 1.51 | 51.9 | — |
| 48 |  Vinnie Hinostroza | C | 49 | 6 | 8 | 14 | -1 | 17 | 76 | 7.9% | 11:59 | 1.43 | 47.9 | — |
| 70 |  Dennis Rasmussen | C | 68 | 4 | 4 | 8 | -4 | 12 | 77 | 5.2% | 11:50 | 0.60 | 51.4 | — |
| 6 |  Michal Kempny | D | 50 | 2 | 6 | 8 | +1 | 22 | 67 | 3.0% | 14:58 | 0.64 | 54.5 | — |
| 64 |  Tyler Motte | C | 33 | 4 | 3 | 7 | +2 | 14 | 46 | 8.7% | 11:23 | 1.12 | 44.2 | — |
| 42 |  Gustav Forsling | D | 38 | 2 | 3 | 5 | +3 | 4 | 48 | 4.2% | 14:49 | 0.53 | 46.0 | — |
| 32 |  Michal Rozsival | D | 22 | 1 | 2 | 3 | -3 | 14 | 16 | 6.3% | 15:30 | 0.53 | 49.3 | — |
| 22 |  Jordin Tootoo | R | 50 | 2 | 1 | 3 | -6 | 28 | 43 | 4.7% | 6:45 | 0.53 | 53.4 | — |
| 11 |  Andrew Desjardins | L | 46 | 0 | 1 | 1 | -6 | 22 | 46 | 0.0% | 9:24 | 0.14 | 49.4 | — |
GSAx: goals saved above expected, all situations, empty-net goals excluded.
| Games | Record | Shots faced | Goals allowed | Model | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | Goalie | GP | GS | W | L | OTL | SA | SV% | GA | GAA | GSAx |
| 50 |  Corey Crawford | 55 | 55 | 32 | 18 | 4 | 1691 | .918 | 138 | 2.55 | +16.3 |
| 33 |  Scott Darling | 32 | 27 | 18 | 5 | 5 | 877 | .924 | 67 | 2.38 | +14.1 |
Playoff games only · no league ranks, since too few clubs play for a fair comparison
| Round | Opponent | Result | Games |
|---|---|---|---|
| Round 1 | NSH | Lost 0–4 | 4 |
| Player | GP | G | A | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patrick Kane | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Jonathan Toews | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Dennis Rasmussen | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Duncan Keith | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Marcus Kruger | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Artemi Panarin | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Goalie | GP | W-L | SV% | GAA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Corey Crawford | 4 | 0-4 | .902 | 2.84 |
2016–17 · playoffs · every finished game
| Date | Opponent | Score | Result | SOG | SA | Shot diff | xGF% | PP | Starting goalie |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 20 | @ NSH | 1–4 | L | 31 | 26 | +5 | 35.4 | — | Corey Crawford |
| Apr 17 | @ NSH | 2–3 | L (OT) | 36 | 49 | -13 | 36.0 | — | Corey Crawford |
| Apr 15 | vs NSH | 0–5 | L | 30 | 29 | +1 | 55.6 | — | Corey Crawford |
| Apr 13 | vs NSH | 0–1 | L | 29 | 20 | +9 | 62.1 | — | Corey Crawford |
| 4 games | 0-4 | 31.5 | 31.0 | 0.5 | 44.6 | — | |||
Summary: record, average SOG and SA per game, pooled xG share and power-play total for the filtered games.
2016–17 · regular season · every finished game
| Date | Opponent | Score | Result | SOG | SA | Shot diff | xGF% | PP | Starting goalie |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 8 | @ LAK | 2–3 | OTL (OT) | 27 | 26 | +1 | 47.6 | 0/3 | Corey Crawford |
| Apr 6 | @ ANA | 0–4 | L | 37 | 26 | +11 | 57.9 | 0/3 | Corey Crawford |
| Apr 4 | @ COL | 3–4 | OTL (OT) | 27 | 51 | -24 | 30.8 | 1/3 | Scott Darling |
| Apr 2 | vs BOS | 2–3 | L | 43 | 29 | +14 | 63.9 | 0/3 | Corey Crawford |
| Mar 31 | vs CBJ | 3–1 | W | 24 | 33 | -9 | 52.0 | 1/3 | Corey Crawford |
| Mar 29 | @ PIT | 5–1 | W | 36 | 32 | +4 | 60.5 | 0/4 | Corey Crawford |
| Mar 27 | @ TBL | 4–5 | OTL (OT) | 32 | 30 | +2 | 51.9 | 0/3 | Scott Darling |
| Mar 25 | @ FLA | 0–7 | L | 25 | 31 | -6 | 50.3 | 0/3 | Corey Crawford |
| Mar 23 | vs DAL | 3–2 | W (SO) | 26 | 44 | -18 | 37.7 | 1/4 | Corey Crawford |
| Mar 21 | vs VAN | 4–5 | OTL (OT) | 44 | 15 | +29 | 81.0 | 2/6 | Corey Crawford |
| Mar 19 | vs COL | 6–3 | W | 34 | 25 | +9 | 55.9 | 0/1 | Scott Darling |
| Mar 18 | @ TOR | 2–1 | W (OT) | 39 | 26 | +13 | 49.1 | 0/0 | Corey Crawford |
| Mar 16 | @ OTT | 2–1 | W | 28 | 34 | -6 | 55.2 | 1/4 | Scott Darling |
| Mar 14 | @ MTL | 4–2 | W | 24 | 42 | -18 | 40.8 | 0/1 | Corey Crawford |
| Mar 12 | vs MIN | 4–2 | W | 22 | 44 | -22 | 41.8 | 0/3 | Corey Crawford |
| Mar 10 | @ DET | 2–4 | L | 26 | 29 | -3 | 30.2 | 0/2 | Corey Crawford |
| Mar 9 | vs ANA | 0–1 | L | 43 | 26 | +17 | 69.4 | 0/2 | Corey Crawford |
| Mar 4 | @ NSH | 5–3 | W | 33 | 35 | -2 | 48.0 | 2/2 | Corey Crawford |
| Mar 3 | vs NYI | 2–1 | W (SO) | 31 | 32 | -1 | 52.9 | 0/2 | Corey Crawford |
| Mar 1 | vs PIT | 4–1 | W | 29 | 37 | -8 | 50.9 | 0/1 | Scott Darling |
| Feb 26 | vs STL | 4–2 | W | 42 | 32 | +10 | 63.1 | 1/2 | Scott Darling |
| Feb 23 | vs ARI | 6–3 | W | 29 | 37 | -8 | 51.9 | 0/2 | Corey Crawford |
| Feb 21 | @ MIN | 5–3 | W | 39 | 32 | +7 | 54.1 | 0/2 | Corey Crawford |
| Feb 19 | @ BUF | 5–1 | W | 37 | 26 | +11 | 55.5 | 0/3 | Scott Darling |
| Feb 18 | vs EDM | 1–3 | L | 39 | 22 | +17 | 73.6 | 0/3 | Corey Crawford |
| Feb 11 | @ EDM | 5–1 | W | 25 | 31 | -6 | 52.0 | 2/2 | Scott Darling |
| Feb 10 | @ WPG | 5–2 | W | 36 | 30 | +6 | 60.8 | 0/2 | Corey Crawford |
| Feb 8 | @ MIN | 4–3 | W (OT) | 32 | 38 | -6 | 49.6 | 1/2 | Corey Crawford |
| Feb 4 | @ DAL | 5–3 | W | 36 | 34 | +2 | 59.4 | 1/2 | Corey Crawford |
| Feb 2 | @ ARI | 4–3 | W | 26 | 27 | -1 | 52.1 | 2/4 | Corey Crawford |
| Jan 31 | @ SJS | 1–3 | L | 25 | 29 | -4 | 44.4 | 0/3 | Corey Crawford |
| Jan 26 | vs WPG | 3–5 | L | 41 | 33 | +8 | 54.6 | 1/5 | Scott Darling |
| Jan 24 | vs TBL | 2–5 | L | 36 | 36 | 0 | 42.1 | 0/3 | Corey Crawford |
| Jan 22 | vs VAN | 4–2 | W | 35 | 28 | +7 | 66.0 | 0/1 | Corey Crawford |
| Jan 20 | @ BOS | 1–0 | W | 22 | 30 | -8 | 26.5 | 0/3 | Scott Darling |
| Jan 17 | @ COL | 6–4 | W | 27 | 23 | +4 | 66.3 | 0/1 | Corey Crawford |
| Jan 15 | vs MIN | 2–3 | L | 35 | 32 | +3 | 60.4 | 0/2 | Corey Crawford |
| Jan 13 | @ WSH | 0–6 | L | 24 | 34 | -10 | 39.4 | 0/2 | Corey Crawford |
| Jan 10 | vs DET | 4–3 | W (OT) | 43 | 36 | +7 | 57.1 | 2/6 | Corey Crawford |
| Jan 8 | vs NSH | 5–2 | W | 31 | 27 | +4 | 59.5 | 0/1 | Corey Crawford |
| Jan 6 | vs CAR | 2–1 | W | 24 | 40 | -16 | 48.6 | 1/3 | Scott Darling |
| Jan 5 | vs BUF | 4–3 | W (OT) | 43 | 20 | +23 | 73.0 | 0/2 | Corey Crawford |
| Jan 2 | @ STL | 1–4 | L | 23 | 35 | -12 | 35.4 | 0/3 | Corey Crawford |
| Dec 30 | @ CAR | 2–3 | L | 29 | 28 | +1 | 46.4 | 0/1 | Scott Darling |
| Dec 29 | @ NSH | 3–2 | W | 23 | 38 | -15 | 41.6 | 2/5 | Corey Crawford |
| Dec 27 | vs WPG | 1–3 | L | 35 | 34 | +1 | 37.8 | 0/3 | Corey Crawford |
| Dec 23 | vs COL | 1–2 | OTL (OT) | 39 | 34 | +5 | 52.5 | 1/4 | Corey Crawford |
| Dec 20 | vs OTT | 3–4 | L | 26 | 30 | -4 | 51.5 | 1/3 | Scott Darling |
| Dec 18 | vs SJS | 4–1 | W | 26 | 34 | -8 | 45.3 | 0/2 | Scott Darling |
| Dec 17 | @ STL | 6–4 | W | 36 | 27 | +9 | 69.2 | 0/3 | Scott Darling |
| Dec 15 | @ NYI | 5–4 | W | 32 | 32 | 0 | 58.8 | 3/3 | Scott Darling |
| Dec 13 | @ NYR | 2–1 | W | 26 | 34 | -8 | 48.9 | 0/1 | Scott Darling |
| Dec 11 | vs DAL | 3–1 | W | 27 | 24 | +3 | 52.3 | 1/3 | Scott Darling |
| Dec 9 | vs NYR | 0–1 | OTL (OT) | 26 | 37 | -11 | 43.5 | 0/1 | Scott Darling |
| Dec 6 | vs ARI | 4–0 | W | 27 | 22 | +5 | 58.4 | 1/3 | Scott Darling |
| Dec 4 | vs WPG | 1–2 | L | 26 | 32 | -6 | 44.0 | 0/3 | Scott Darling |
| Dec 3 | @ PHI | 1–3 | L | 27 | 30 | -3 | 49.7 | 0/1 | Scott Darling |
| Dec 1 | vs NJD | 4–3 | W (OT) | 33 | 33 | 0 | 46.3 | 0/4 | Corey Crawford |
| Nov 29 | vs FLA | 2–1 | W (SO) | 33 | 39 | -6 | 52.0 | 0/2 | Corey Crawford |
| Nov 26 | @ LAK | 1–2 | OTL (OT) | 19 | 29 | -10 | 41.4 | 0/3 | Scott Darling |
| Nov 25 | @ ANA | 3–2 | W | 25 | 36 | -11 | 42.5 | 1/2 | Corey Crawford |
| Nov 23 | @ SJS | 1–2 | L | 34 | 35 | -1 | 41.4 | 0/2 | Corey Crawford |
| Nov 21 | @ EDM | 0–5 | L | 31 | 27 | +4 | 46.0 | 0/2 | Corey Crawford |
| Nov 19 | @ VAN | 4–3 | W (OT) | 32 | 27 | +5 | 46.3 | 0/3 | Scott Darling |
| Nov 18 | @ CGY | 3–2 | W | 24 | 30 | -6 | 47.1 | 1/1 | Corey Crawford |
| Nov 15 | @ WPG | 0–4 | L | 27 | 24 | +3 | 46.1 | 0/3 | Corey Crawford |
| Nov 13 | vs MTL | 3–2 | W | 35 | 23 | +12 | 68.5 | 0/2 | Corey Crawford |
| Nov 11 | vs WSH | 2–3 | OTL (OT) | 34 | 28 | +6 | 48.2 | 1/2 | Corey Crawford |
| Nov 9 | @ STL | 2–1 | W (OT) | 30 | 28 | +2 | 54.7 | 0/5 | Corey Crawford |
| Nov 6 | vs DAL | 4–3 | W (OT) | 33 | 35 | -2 | 56.4 | 0/4 | Scott Darling |
| Nov 5 | @ DAL | 3–2 | W | 32 | 33 | -1 | 34.2 | 1/6 | Corey Crawford |
| Nov 3 | vs COL | 4–0 | W | 21 | 38 | -17 | 36.3 | 0/2 | Corey Crawford |
| Nov 1 | vs CGY | 5–1 | W | 22 | 34 | -12 | 48.2 | 1/4 | Corey Crawford |
| Oct 30 | vs LAK | 3–0 | W | 29 | 32 | -3 | 59.0 | 2/7 | Corey Crawford |
| Oct 28 | @ NJD | 3–2 | W (OT) | 29 | 32 | -3 | 53.8 | 2/5 | Corey Crawford |
| Oct 24 | vs CGY | 2–3 | OTL (SO) | 33 | 31 | +2 | 62.7 | 0/2 | Corey Crawford |
| Oct 22 | vs TOR | 5–4 | W (SO) | 35 | 34 | +1 | 52.9 | 0/6 | Scott Darling |
| Oct 21 | @ CBJ | 2–3 | L | 34 | 28 | +6 | 49.5 | 0/4 | Corey Crawford |
| Oct 18 | vs PHI | 7–4 | W | 28 | 27 | +1 | 64.9 | 2/3 | Corey Crawford |
| Oct 15 | vs NSH | 5–3 | W | 27 | 36 | -9 | 54.0 | 2/3 | Scott Darling |
| Oct 14 | @ NSH | 2–3 | L | 24 | 27 | -3 | 53.7 | 0/4 | Corey Crawford |
| Oct 12 | vs STL | 2–5 | L | 19 | 33 | -14 | 25.3 | 1/4 | Corey Crawford |
| 82 games | 50-23-9 | 30.6 | 31.4 | -0.8 | 51.7 | 42/233 | |||
Summary: record, average SOG and SA per game, pooled xG share and power-play total for the filtered games.
Loading…
Every metric name opens its definition; the full list lives in Metrics.
Every section reads one season sample per situation. Five-on-five is official five-on-five strength; power play and penalty kill include 5v3, 4v3 and 6v4, and plain 6v5 is Other. Other is all situations minus the three, so situation rows sum. Power play and penalty kill are read from this team’s side, so shots against on the power play are the opponent’s shorthanded chances.
The situation filter (all situations or five-on-five) sets Season metrics, Season vs reference, On-ice rates and the Defense suppression rows, and opens the shot map on the same choice; the shot map’s own Situation select adds power play and penalty kill. The header, the percentile radar, Results, goaltending, discipline, Special teams, Form, Roster, Game log and Seasons keep the scope their own labels state.
Team ice time is the elapsed team clock from shift charts. Per-60 rates use only games with a complete clock and appear when at least 90% of games have one. Power-play opportunities, times shorthanded, penalty minutes, hits, blocks, giveaways, takeaways and faceoffs are official team box counts from the NHL game summary; official PP% and PK% use them.
Goals and saves above expected exclude empty-net goals. Shot-type shooting percentage is goals divided by shots on goal. High danger in ranked rows is model scoring probability of at least 0.20; the shot-map tier filter uses the player page’s location tiers. PDO is ranked high to low but is context, not a quality grade.
One-goal games include overtime and shootout decisions, and scoring first uses the first non-shootout goal. Shot callouts exclude shots on an empty net; attempts are unblocked, because blocked shots carry no location. Blocks and hits describe volume and time defending, so they are ranked but colored as context. Penalties count minor, major, bench and match events; misconducts and penalty shots are excluded.
Special-teams rates, shorthanded goals and net goals use the widened scopes above, which can differ from the official counts by a goal or two over a season. In Season vs reference, a change is colored by whether it helps the team, and Points % appears only in all situations. Season metrics leaves out the rows the Defense table shows and, in all situations, the rows the header shows.
An em dash means unavailable, not zero. A partial season remains partial. Percentiles and ranks need at least 20 teams.
Explore the full methodology →Unblocked attempts for and against · rinks use the player page’s geometric chance tiers
220 goals on 242.1 xG (-22.1). Finishing 6.7% vs 7.3% expected per unblocked attempt.
205 goals allowed on 235.5 xG against (+30.5 saved above expected).
| Zone | For | Against | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Att | xG | G | Att | xG | G | |
| Point | 1084 | 33.8 | 36 | 1062 | 28.0 | 31 |
| High slot | 909 | 93.4 | 73 | 894 | 84.5 | 67 |
| Inner slot | 630 | 94.2 | 108 | 709 | 99.8 | 92 |
| Outer slot | 269 | 20.3 | 10 | 225 | 15.9 | 10 |
| Right circle | 228 | 9.3 | 8 | 268 | 6.7 | 5 |
| Left circle | 220 | 7.3 | 5 | 251 | 7.2 | 5 |
| Below goal line | 7 | 0.4 | 0 | 18 | 0.6 | 2 |
| Location unrecorded | 1 | 0.7 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 |
| All zones | 3348 | 259.5 | 240 | 3427 | 242.6 | 212 |
| Type | Att | Share | G | xG | Sh% | G−xG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wrist | 1702 | 50.8% | 136 | 148.8 | 10.2 | -12.8 |
| Slap | 905 | 27.0% | 43 | 41.8 | 6.9 | +1.2 |
| Snap | 304 | 9.1% | 26 | 26.8 | 11.3 | -0.8 |
| Backhand | 239 | 7.1% | 21 | 24.2 | 10.9 | -3.2 |
| Tip-in | 136 | 4.1% | 11 | 12.1 | 12.5 | -1.1 |
| Deflected | 36 | 1.1% | 2 | 4.1 | 11.8 | -2.1 |
| Wrap-around | 26 | 0.8% | 1 | 1.8 | 4.2 | -0.8 |
Official record and season-level team metrics · cells shaded by league percentile that season
| Season | GP | Record | PTS | GF | GA | Diff | P% | xGF% | CF% | GAx | PDO | PP% | PK% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026–27 partial | 9 | 3-6-0 | 6 | 21 | 36 | -15 | 33.3 | 43.2 | 42.4 | -2.5 | 97.8 | 14.3 | 79.2 |
| 2025–26 | 82 | 29-39-14 | 72 | 213 | 275 | -62 | 43.9 | 43.9 | 46.1 | -12.7 | 99.4 | 16.9 | 83.6 ★ |
| 2024–25 | 82 | 25-46-11 | 61 | 226 | 296 | -70 | 37.2 | 41.6 | 44.0 | 15.1 ★ | 99.7 | 24.9 ★ | 79.3 |
| 2023–24 | 82 | 23-53-6 | 52 | 179 | 290 | -111 | 31.7 | 42.0 | 44.7 | -33.1 | 97.5 | 16.6 | 75.8 |
| 2022–23 | 82 | 26-49-7 | 59 | 204 | 301 | -97 | 36.0 | 42.6 | 44.6 | -29.1 | 98.3 | 16.4 | 76.2 |
| 2021–22 | 82 | 28-42-12 | 68 | 219 | 291 | -72 | 41.5 | 46.9 | 46.4 | -34.5 | 98.3 | 19.2 | 76.2 |
| 2020–21 | 56 | 24-25-7 | 55 | 161 | 186 | -25 | 49.1 | 46.9 | 46.7 | -11.8 | 100.0 | 21.7 | 76.8 |
| 2019–20 | 70 | 32-30-8 | 72 | 212 | 218 | -6 | 51.4 ★ | 48.6 ★ | 48.9 ★ | -26.5 | 100.6 ★ | 15.2 | 82.1 |
★ best full season in the table for that column (PDO is context). Shading uses each season’s league percentile; the in-progress season is partial.
