New Jersey Devils

League percentile profile

All situations · six composite axes against all 32 teams

New Jersey Devils

Ranked shape withheld where sample or peer coverage is insufficient.

Bands show league percentiles; axis labels show this season’s values.

Selected metric distribution

Team value: 3.17
League range: 2.53 – 3.63 / game

Lower Higher (better)

Team 3.17 · mean 3.12. Higher raw values rank higher.

Expected goals for per game.

Season metrics

All situations · against all 32 teams

Results	Team	Percentile	Rank
	52.2		13 / 3261st

Shot share	Team	Percentile	Rank
	52.6		9 / 3274th
	51.7		6 / 3284th
	50.8		10 / 3271st
	51.6		7 / 3281st
	54.9		8 / 3277th
	52.0		11 / 3268th
	51.7		8 / 3277th

Chance volume	Team	Percentile	Rank
	3.17		14 / 3258th
	60.99		10 / 3271st
	2.55		10 / 3271st

Finishing & goaltending	Team	Percentile	Rank
	10.4		19 / 3242nd
	89.8		11 / 3268th
	100.25		13 / 3261st
	-21.12		24 / 3226th

Elite90+Strong70–89Average30–69Weak10–29Poor<10Context · not gradedBar length is the peer percentile, so longer is always better · tick at the 50th

Season vs reference

All situations · this season against a reference

Reference:

Metric	This season	2023–24	Change
%	55.5	49.4	+6.1
/ GP	2.95	3.22	-0.27
/ GP	2.71	3.45	-0.74
/ GP	0.24	-0.23	+0.48
/ GP	3.17	3.11	+0.06
/ GP	2.86	3.22	-0.36
%	52.6	49.2	+3.4
%	51.7	51.9	-0.2
%	54.9	46.7	+8.2
%	10.4	10.5	-0.1
%	89.8	88.6	+1.3
index	100.25	99.06	+1.19
goals	-21.12	1.48	-22.60
goals	—	-12.44	—

League percentile profile

All situations · six composite axes against all 32 teams

New Jersey Devils

Ranked shape withheld where sample or peer coverage is insufficient.

Bands show league percentiles; axis labels show this season’s values.

Selected metric distribution

Team value: 3.17
League range: 2.53 – 3.63 / game

Lower Higher (better)

Team 3.17 · mean 3.12. Higher raw values rank higher.

Expected goals for per game.

Season metrics

All situations · against all 32 teams

Results	Team	Percentile	Rank
	52.2		13 / 3261st

Shot share	Team	Percentile	Rank
	52.6		9 / 3274th
	51.7		6 / 3284th
	50.8		10 / 3271st
	51.6		7 / 3281st
	54.9		8 / 3277th

Chance volume	Team	Percentile	Rank
	3.17		14 / 3258th
	60.99		10 / 3271st
	2.55		10 / 3271st

Finishing & goaltending	Team	Percentile	Rank
	10.4		19 / 3242nd
	89.8		11 / 3268th
	100.25		13 / 3261st
	-21.12		24 / 3226th

Elite90+Strong70–89Average30–69Weak10–29Poor<10Context · not gradedBar length is the peer percentile, so longer is always better · tick at the 50th

Season vs reference

All situations · this season against a reference

Reference:

Metric	This season	2023–24	Change
%	55.5	49.4	+6.1
/ GP	2.95	3.22	-0.27
/ GP	2.71	3.45	-0.74
/ GP	0.24	-0.23	+0.48
/ GP	3.17	3.11	+0.06
/ GP	2.86	3.22	-0.36
%	52.6	49.2	+3.4
%	51.7	51.9	-0.2
%	54.9	46.7	+8.2
%	10.4	10.5	-0.1
%	89.8	88.6	+1.3
index	100.25	99.06	+1.19
goals	-21.12	1.48	-22.60
goals	—	-12.44	—

Points pace

Cumulative standings points by game against a 96-point pace over 82 games

2.00 pts · 96-point pace 1.17

Oct 4, 2024 · at BUF

vs pace: −5.0
First half: 51
Second half: 40
Best run: W3

91 points after 82 games; the pace line expects 96.0 (-5.0).

Standings

Official standings as of Apr 17, 2025 · the playoff line is the first team out of the field (top three per division, two wild cards)

League: 16th
Eastern: 7th
Metropolitan: 3rd
Regulation wins: 36

Points behind the league leader	25
Points behind the Eastern leader	20
Points behind the Metropolitan leader	20
Points above the playoff line	+2

Results vs expected

All situations · goals and expected goals per 60 of clocked team ice time · all 32 teams

Per-60 rates pending: team ice time covers under 90% of games.

By situation

Season totals; Other is all situations minus 5v5, PP and PK, so rows sum to all situations.

Situation	TOI / GP	GF	GA	xGF	xGA	xG diff	xGF%
Five-on-five	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Power play	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Penalty kill	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Other	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
All situations	—	242	222	260.0	234.3	+25.8	52.6

Score state

Time in each state is all situations; shares are five-on-five · shootouts excluded

State	Time / GP	Share of time	5v5 xG share	5v5 CF%	5v5 GF–GA
Leading	21:06	34.9%	49.6%	44.9%	52–47
Tied	22:26	37.1%	53.2%	52.7%	62–54
Trailing	17:00	28.1%	52.8%	57.7%	35–50

Leading teams usually give up share as they protect a lead, so a lower share while leading is expected.

Defensive metrics

All situations · lower against rates rank higher

Suppression & events	Team	Percentile	Rank
	0.069		5 / 3287th
	2.86		7 / 3281st
	2.10		8 / 3277th
	56.96		6 / 3284th
	14.09		28 / 3213th
	23.52		10 / 3271st
	4.17		32 / 321st
	15.27		T-21 / 3235th

Context · not graded

Goaltending

All situations · goals saved above expected per goalie · empty-net goals excluded

Goalie	GP	GS	Start share	W-L-OTL	SV%	xGA	GSAx
Jacob Markstrom	49	49	59.8%	26-16-6	.900	125.4	+4.4
Jake Allen	31	29	35.4%	13-16-1	.908	—	—
Nico Daws	6	4	4.9%	3-1-0	.939	11.5	+4.5
Team		82				—	—

Team GSAx is unavailable; the goalie rows sum to it.

Discipline

Official counts · all situations

Penalties taken / GP: 3.37
Penalties drawn / GP: 3.29
Differential / GP: -0.07
PIM / GP: 8.23

Shot locations

Unblocked attempts for and against · chance tiers are model goal probability: high ≥ 0.20, medium ≥ 0.08

Situation

Chances:

View:

Shot type

Shots for 3510 attempts · 260.1 xG

Shots against 3394 attempts · 234.2 xG

Finishing evidence

229 goals on 250.1 xG (-21.1). Finishing 6.6% vs 7.2% expected per unblocked attempt.

Goaltending evidence

204 goals allowed on 222.9 xG against (+18.9 saved above expected).

High-danger for: 209
High-danger against: 172
Rebound shots: 399 – 325
Rebound xG: 32.8 – 30.8

Zones, for

Zone	Att	G	xG	Goal rate / exp.	G−xG
High slot	933	95	92.1	10.2% / 9.9%	+2.9
Right circle	280	6	7.7	2.1% / 2.7%	−1.7
Below goal line	59	0	2.1	0.0% / 3.6%	−2.1
Outer slot	258	17	19.2	6.6% / 7.4%	−2.2
Left circle	273	5	7.3	1.8% / 2.7%	−2.3
Point	937	15	19.6	1.6% / 2.1%	−4.6
Inner slot	745	91	102.2	12.2% / 13.7%	−11.2
All zones	3,485	229	250.1	6.6% / 7.2%	−21.1

Zones, against

Zone	Att	GA	xGA	Goal rate / exp.	Prevented
High slot	826	66	79.3	8.0% / 9.6%	+13.3
Inner slot	679	81	88.9	11.9% / 13.1%	+7.9
Left circle	259	2	6.8	0.8% / 2.6%	+4.8
Right circle	246	4	7.0	1.6% / 2.9%	+3.0
Below goal line	55	3	2.1	5.5% / 3.8%	−0.9
Outer slot	207	18	15.6	8.7% / 7.6%	−2.4
Point	1,101	30	23.3	2.7% / 2.1%	−6.7
All zones	3,373	204	222.9	6.0% / 6.6%	+18.9

Sorted by goals against expectation. Empty-net attempts are left out, as in the evidence lines above.

Shot types, for

Type	Att	Share	G	xG	Sh%	G−xG
Wrist	1692	48.2%	114	109.5	9.9	+4.5
Snap	802	22.8%	65	70.9	12.0	-5.9
Slap	335	9.5%	14	17.1	6.8	-3.1
Tip-in	290	8.3%	18	24.8	12.9	-6.8
Backhand	271	7.7%	17	24.6	9.5	-7.6
Deflected	65	1.9%	9	7.9	19.1	+1.1
Wrap-around	34	1.0%	1	2.3	5.0	-1.3
Poke	13	0.4%	0	1.8	0.0	-1.8
Bat	5	0.1%	2	0.9	66.7	+1.1
Between-legs	3	0.1%	0	0.3	0.0	-0.3

Shot density

Loading…

Record splits

W–L–OTL, points % and goals per game · rest counts days off before the game; the playoff field is the standings' top three per division plus two wild cards

Split	GP	W–L–OTL	PTS	P%	GF/GP	GA/GP
Venue
Home	41	19–17–5	43	52.4%	2.88	2.76
Away	41	23–16–2	48	58.5%	3.02	2.66
Opponent
vs Western	32	16–15–1	33	51.6%	2.56	2.44
vs Eastern	50	26–18–6	58	58.0%	3.20	2.88
vs own division	26	14–9–3	31	59.6%	3.23	2.73
vs playoff teams	39	17–18–4	38	48.7%	2.64	3.00
vs non-playoff teams	43	25–15–3	53	61.6%	3.23	2.44
Game state
One-goal games	28	12–9–7	31	55.4%	2.75	2.89
Scoring first	40	29–8–3	61	76.3%	3.65	2.27
Allowing first	42	13–25–4	30	35.7%	2.29	3.12
Recent
Last 10	10	5–5–0	10	50.0%	2.80	3.20
Rest
Back-to-back	12	3–8–1	7	29.2%	2.33	2.92
1 day of rest	45	27–14–4	58	64.4%	3.04	2.51
2+ days of rest	24	11–11–2	24	50.0%	3.04	3.04

By period

Goals for and against · a shootout decider counts as an overtime goal

1st period5359

2nd period9165

3rd period9291

Overtime67

For Against

Forward lines

Five-on-five · the four lines with the most time together, from shift charts

Line	TOI	xG share	GF–GA	CF%	Team without them
Palat – Bratt – Hughes	518:33	56.6%	32–18	53.9%	50.8%
Noesen – Meier – Hischier	326:41	58.5%	17–14	54.1%	51.0%
Meier – Hischier – Mercer	270:37	51.5%	9–7	50.5%	51.7%
Haula – Noesen – Cotter	181:05	51.5%	17–14	45.8%	51.7%

Defense pairs

Five-on-five · the three pairs with the most time together

Pair	TOI	xG share	GF–GA	CF%	Team without them
Pesce – Hughes	866:16	53.7%	34–38	51.9%	51.1%
Siegenthaler – Kovacevic	743:02	55.1%	35–28	51.3%	51.0%
Dillon – Hamilton	718:43	53.4%	32–25	52.3%	51.2%

Units are found from the skaters on the ice for the club’s five-on-five shot events; time together intersects their shifts with five-on-five play. Team without them is the club’s five-on-five xG share with that unit off the ice.

Loading…

Leaders

This club’s games only · season totals and average ice time

Points: 88
Goals: 35
Assists: 67
Ice time: 21:19
GSAx: +4.5

Skaters

This club’s games only · P/60 and 5v5 xG share use this stint; grade is the full season

Position:

			Games	Scoring			Discipline		Shots		Time	Model
#	Player	Pos	GP	G	A	P	+/−	PIM	SOG	S%	ATOI	P/60	5v5 xG%	Grade
63	Jesper Bratt	L	81	21	67	88	+5	18	180	11.7%	18:57	3.44	–	—
86	Jack Hughes	C	62	27	43	70	+12	18	229	11.8%	20:54	3.24	57.4	A+
13	Nico Hischier	C	75	35	34	69	+9	20	187	18.7%	20:23	2.71	–	—
28	Timo Meier	R	80	26	27	53	+7	58	239	10.9%	17:52	2.23	–	A−
43	Luke Hughes	D	71	7	37	44	-9	16	121	5.8%	21:09	1.76	–	—
11	Stefan Noesen	R	78	22	19	41	-8	54	165	13.3%	15:56	1.98	–	—
7	Dougie Hamilton	D	64	9	31	40	+8	30	186	4.8%	19:51	1.89	52.9	A+
91	Dawson Mercer	C	82	19	17	36	+4	16	141	13.5%	17:53	1.47	–	—
18	Ondrej Palat	L	77	15	13	28	-5	12	96	15.6%	13:45	1.59	–	—
47	Paul Cotter	L	79	16	6	22	-14	62	90	17.8%	13:05	1.28	–	F
56	Erik Haula	L	69	11	10	21	-6	39	110	10.0%	14:42	1.24	–	—
90	Tomas Tatar	L	74	7	10	17	-7	20	66	10.6%	11:06	1.24	–	—
22	Brett Pesce	D	72	3	14	17	-5	29	99	3.0%	21:19	0.66	–	—
8	Johnathan Kovacevic	D	81	1	16	17	+10	72	76	1.3%	19:49	0.64	–	—
5	Brenden Dillon	D	82	2	14	16	+8	67	48	4.2%	18:35	0.63	–	—
14	Nathan Bastian	R	59	4	6	10	-4	31	44	9.1%	10:56	0.93	–	—
71	Jonas Siegenthaler	D	55	2	7	9	+9	44	52	3.8%	19:36	0.50	54.5	A−
37	Justin Dowling	C	52	2	5	7	-6	6	34	5.9%	10:13	0.79	–	F
42	Curtis Lazar	C	48	2	3	5	-6	14	27	7.4%	10:34	0.59	–	C
17	Simon Nemec	D	27	2	2	4	-10	14	26	7.7%	14:59	0.59	–	—
23	Kurtis MacDermid	L	23	0	0	0	-5	23	7	0.0%	5:47	0.00	39.4	—

Goalies

GSAx: goals saved above expected, all situations, empty-net goals excluded.

	Games	Record	Shots faced	Goals allowed	Model
25	Jacob Markstrom	49	49	26	16	6	1214	.900	121	2.50	+4.4
34	Jake Allen	31	29	13	16	1	819	.908	77	2.66	–
50	Nico Daws	6	4	3	1	0	114	.939	7	1.60	+4.5

2024–25 playoffs

Playoff games only · no league ranks, since too few clubs play for a fair comparison

Record: 1-4
Series won: 0
Goals: 11–19
xG share: 40.7%
Shots: 144–183

Series

Round	Opponent	Result	Games
Round 1	CAR	Lost 1–4	5

Leading scorers

Player	GP	G	A	P
Nico Hischier	5	4	0	4
Timo Meier	5	2	2	4
Jesper Bratt	5	1	2	3
Brett Pesce	5	0	3	3
Dawson Mercer	5	2	0	2
Stefan Noesen	5	1	1	2

Goaltending

Goalie	GP	W-L	SV%	GAA
Jacob Markstrom	5	1-4	.911	2.78

Playoff games

2024–25 · playoffs · every finished game

Games:

Venue:

Date	Opponent	Result	SOG	SA	Shot diff	xGF%	Starting goalie
Apr 29	@ CAR	L 4–5 OT	35	54	-19	33.0%	Jacob Markstrom
Apr 27	vs CAR	L 2–5	22	29	-7	40.6%	Jacob Markstrom
Apr 25	vs CAR	W 3–2 OT	37	27	+10	60.4%	Jacob Markstrom
Apr 22	@ CAR	L 1–3	26	28	-2	40.5%	Jacob Markstrom
Apr 20	@ CAR	L 1–4	24	45	-21	28.8%	Jacob Markstrom
5 games		1–4	28.8	36.6	-7.8	40.7%

Summary: record, average SOG and SA per game, pooled xG share and power-play total for the filtered games.

Every playoff run

The club's recorded playoff runs, newest first · a playoff overtime loss is a loss

Season	GP
2024–25	5
2022–23	12
2017–18	5

2024–25 · regular season · every finished game

Games:

Venue:

Date	Opponent	Result	SOG	SA	Shot diff	xGF%	PP	Starting goalie
Apr 16	vs DET	L 2–5	30	27	+3	37.3%	1/2	Nico Daws
Apr 15	@ BOS	W 5–4 OT	26	24	+2	56.0%	2/2	Jake Allen
Apr 13	vs NYI	L 0–1	25	23	+2	51.8%	0/1	Jacob Markstrom
Apr 11	vs PIT	L 2–4	28	24	+4	45.6%	0/3	Jake Allen
Apr 8	vs BOS	L 2–7	21	25	-4	47.3%	0/1	Jacob Markstrom
Apr 5	vs NYR	W 4–0	16	26	-10	52.9%	1/2	Jacob Markstrom
Mar 31	vs MIN	W 3–2 SO	28	30	-2	44.8%	0/2	Jacob Markstrom
Mar 29	@ MIN	W 5–2	33	24	+9	49.0%	1/1	Jacob Markstrom
Mar 28	@ WPG	L 0–4	24	19	+5	42.0%	0/3	Jake Allen
Mar 26	@ CHI	W 5–3	21	24	-3	58.5%	2/2	Jacob Markstrom
10 games		5–5–0	25.2	24.6	0.6	48.5%	7/19

Summary: record, average SOG and SA per game, pooled xG share and power-play total for the filtered games.

Official record and season-level team metrics · cells shaded by league percentile that season

Season	GP	Record	PTS	GF	GA	Diff	P%	xGF%	CF%	GAx	PDO	PP%	PK%
2026–27 partial	9	5–4–0	10	29	30	-1	55.6	56.0	59.5	-3.1	96.2	23.1	69.6
2025–26	82	42–37–3	87	230	254	-24	53.0	50.2	51.8	-34.1	98.1	22.0	79.3
2024–25	82	42–33–7	91	242	222	+20	55.5	52.6	51.7	-21.1	100.3	28.2	82.7
2023–24	82	38–39–5	81	264	283	-19	49.4	49.2	51.9	1.5	99.1	22.4	80.7
2022–23	82	52–22–8	112	291	226	+65	68.3	55.8	53.7	-23.5	100.7	21.9	82.6
2021–22	82	27–46–9	63	248	307	-59	38.4	49.9	51.0	-18.3	97.7	15.6	80.2
2020–21	56	19–30–7	45	145	194	-49	40.2	47.0	50.2	-2.5	98.1	14.2	70.9
2019–20	69	28–29–12	68	189	230	-41	49.3	48.0	47.4	-17.6	98.8	17.9	82.4

Bold marks the best full season in each column (PDO is context, so it is neither shaded nor marked). Shading uses each season’s league percentile on the five performance tiers; the in-progress season is partial.

Loading…

Every metric name opens its definition; the full list lives in Metrics.

Every section reads one season sample per situation. Five-on-five is official five-on-five strength; power play and penalty kill include 5v3, 4v3 and 6v4, and plain 6v5 is Other. Other is all situations minus the three, so situation rows sum. Power play and penalty kill are read from this team’s side, so shots against on the power play are the opponent’s shorthanded chances.

The situation filter (all situations or five-on-five) sets Season metrics, Season vs reference, On-ice rates and the Defense suppression rows, and opens the shot map on the same choice; the shot map’s own Situation select adds power play and penalty kill. The header, the percentile radar, Results, goaltending, discipline, Special teams, Form, Roster, Game log and Seasons keep the scope their own labels state.

Team ice time is the elapsed team clock from shift charts. Per-60 rates use only games with a complete clock and appear when at least 90% of games have one. Power-play opportunities, times shorthanded, penalty minutes, hits, blocks, giveaways, takeaways and faceoffs are official team box counts from the NHL game summary; official PP% and PK% use them.

Goals above expected and GSAx exclude empty-net goals. Shot-type shooting percentage is goals divided by shots on goal. High danger everywhere on this page, ranked rows and the shot-map tier filter alike, is model scoring probability of at least 0.20 (medium at least 0.08). PDO is ranked high to low but is context, not a quality grade.

One-goal games include overtime and shootout decisions, and scoring first uses the first non-shootout goal. Shot callouts exclude shots on an empty net; attempts are unblocked, because blocked shots carry no location. Blocks and hits describe volume and time defending, so they are ranked but colored as context. Penalties count minor, major, bench and match events; misconducts and penalty shots are excluded.

Special-teams rates, shorthanded goals and net goals use the widened scopes above, which can differ from the official counts by a goal or two over a season. In Season vs reference, a change is colored by whether it helps the team, and Points % appears only in all situations. Season metrics leaves out the rows the Defense table shows and, in all situations, the rows the header shows.

An em dash means unavailable, not zero. A partial season remains partial. Percentiles and ranks need at least 20 teams.

Explore the full methodology →

Season performanceAll situations · league percentiles, reference and ranked metricsCollapse

League percentile profile

Season metrics

Season vs reference

League percentile profile

Season metrics

Season vs reference

Results & record42–33–7 record · 91 points in 82 gamesExplore

Points pace

Standings

On-ice resultsAll situations · rates vs expected, with every situation and period beside themExplore

Results vs expected

By situation

Score state

Defense & goaltendingStrong 2.86 expected goals against per game in all situations (7th of 32)Explore

Defensive metrics

Goaltending

Discipline

Shooting & finishingWeak -21.1 goals above expected in all situations (24th of 32)Explore

Shot locations

Finishing evidence

Goaltending evidence

Zones, for

Zones, against

Shot types, for

Shot density

Special teamsPP · PKPower play: 28.2% (3rd) · Penalty kill: 82.7% (2nd)Explore

Power play

Penalty kill

FormCooling 48.5% xG share over the last 10 games vs 52.6% this season, 5–5–0Explore

Recent form

SplitsHome 19–17–5 · Away 23–16–2Explore

Record splits

By period

Lines & pairs5v5The most-used five-on-five forward lines and defense pairsExplore

Forward lines

Defense pairs

Roster36 active skatersExplore

Leaders

Skaters

Goalies

PlayoffsLost in round 1 to CAR, 1–4 · 1-4 in 5 gamesExplore

2024–25 playoffs

Series

Leading scorers

Goaltending

Playoff games

Every playoff run

Game log82 GP · Last game: L 2–5 vs DETExplore

Seasons8 NHL seasons trackedExplore

Data notesScopes, sources and missing valuesExplore

League percentile profile

Season metrics

Season vs reference

Score state

Forward lines

Defense pairs

Shot locations

Finishing evidence

Goaltending evidence

Zones, for

Zones, against

Shot types, for