Vegas Golden Knights

League percentile profile

All situations · six composite axes against all 32 teams

Vegas Golden KnightsPeer average

Bands show league percentiles; axis labels show this season’s values.

Dashed outline: peer average, the average NHL team this season. Outside = above average; inside = below average. All axes point outward for stronger results.

Selected metric distribution

Team value: 3.31
League range: 2.70 – 3.76 / game

Lower Higher (better)

Team 3.31 · mean 3.16. Higher raw values rank higher.

Expected goals for per game.

Season metrics

All situations · against all 32 teams

Results	Team	Percentile	Rank
	51.5		13 / 3261st

Shot share	Team	Percentile	Rank
	54.6		5 / 3287th
	52.4		6 / 3284th
	52.9		4 / 3290th
	54.3		3 / 3294th
	58.5		4 / 3290th
	54.7		5 / 3287th
	51.9		7 / 3281st

Chance volume	Team	Percentile	Rank
	3.31		10 / 3271st
	60.13		8 / 3277th
	2.68		8 / 3277th

Finishing & goaltending	Team	Percentile	Rank
	11.1		16 / 3252nd
	87.9		27 / 3216th
	99.01		26 / 3219th
	-5.98		14 / 3258th
	-21.47		30 / 326th

Elite90+Strong70–89Average30–69Weak10–29Poor<10Context · not gradedBar length is the peer percentile, so longer is always better · tick at the 50th

Season vs reference

All situations · this season against a reference

Reference:

Metric	This season	2024–25	Change
%	57.9	67.1	-9.1
/ GP	3.23	3.35	-0.12
/ GP	3.05	2.67	+0.38
/ GP	0.18	0.68	-0.50
/ GP	3.31	3.47	-0.15
/ GP	2.75	2.84	-0.09
%	54.6	55.0	-0.4
%	52.4	50.9	+1.5
%	58.5	59.0	-0.5
%	11.1	11.0	+0.1
%	87.9	90.0	-2.1
index	99.01	101.04	-2.04
goals	-5.98	-11.99	+6.00
goals	-21.47	13.04	-34.50

League percentile profile

All situations · six composite axes against all 32 teams

Vegas Golden KnightsPeer average

Bands show league percentiles; axis labels show this season’s values.

Dashed outline: peer average, the average NHL team this season. Outside = above average; inside = below average. All axes point outward for stronger results.

Selected metric distribution

Team value: 3.31
League range: 2.70 – 3.76 / game

Lower Higher (better)

Team 3.31 · mean 3.16. Higher raw values rank higher.

Expected goals for per game.

Season metrics

All situations · against all 32 teams

Results	Team	Percentile	Rank
	51.5		13 / 3261st

Shot share	Team	Percentile	Rank
	54.6		5 / 3287th
	52.4		6 / 3284th
	52.9		4 / 3290th
	54.3		3 / 3294th
	58.5		4 / 3290th

Chance volume	Team	Percentile	Rank
	3.31		10 / 3271st
	60.13		8 / 3277th
	2.68		8 / 3277th

Finishing & goaltending	Team	Percentile	Rank
	11.1		16 / 3252nd
	87.9		27 / 3216th
	99.01		26 / 3219th
	-5.98		14 / 3258th
	-21.47		30 / 326th

Elite90+Strong70–89Average30–69Weak10–29Poor<10Context · not gradedBar length is the peer percentile, so longer is always better · tick at the 50th

Season vs reference

All situations · this season against a reference

Reference:

Metric	This season	2024–25	Change
%	57.9	67.1	-9.1
/ GP	3.23	3.35	-0.12
/ GP	3.05	2.67	+0.38
/ GP	0.18	0.68	-0.50
/ GP	3.31	3.47	-0.15
/ GP	2.75	2.84	-0.09
%	54.6	55.0	-0.4
%	52.4	50.9	+1.5
%	58.5	59.0	-0.5
%	11.1	11.0	+0.1
%	87.9	90.0	-2.1
index	99.01	101.04	-2.04
goals	-5.98	-11.99	+6.00
goals	-21.47	13.04	-34.50

Points pace

Cumulative standings points by game against a 96-point pace over 82 games

1.00 pts · 96-point pace 1.17

Oct 8, 2025 · vs LAK

vs pace: −1.0
First half: 48
Second half: 47
Best run: W7

95 points after 82 games; the pace line expects 96.0 (-1.0).

Standings

Official standings as of Apr 16, 2026 · the playoff line is the first team out of the field (top three per division, two wild cards)

League: 13th
Western: 4th
Pacific: 1st
Regulation wins: 30

Points behind the league leader	26
Points behind the Western leader	26
Points behind the Pacific leader	Leader
Points above the playoff line	+9

Results vs expected

All situations · goals and expected goals per 60 of clocked team ice time · all 32 teams

Per 60	Team	Percentile	Rank
	3.16		14 / 3258th
	3.25		11 / 3268th
	2.89		10 / 3271st
	2.70		2 / 3297th

By situation

Season totals; Other is all situations minus 5v5, PP and PK, so rows sum to all situations.

Situation	TOI / GP	GF	GA	xGF	xGA	xG diff	xGF%
Five-on-five	49:47	174	172	180.2	147.9	+32.3	54.9
Power play	4:29	59	6	60.1	5.6	+54.5	91.5
Penalty kill	4:07	6	38	5.1	38.6	-33.5	11.7
Other	2:47	26	34	26.3	33.5	-7.1	44.0
All situations	61:10	265	250	271.7	225.5	+46.2	54.6

Score state

Time in each state is all situations; shares are five-on-five · shootouts excluded

State	Time / GP	Share of time	5v5 xG share	5v5 CF%	5v5 GF–GA
Leading	16:22	26.7%	51.8%	45.5%	61–50
Tied	20:50	34.1%	54.4%	52.5%	49–68
Trailing	23:58	39.2%	57.7%	56.9%	64–54

Leading teams usually give up share as they protect a lead, so a lower share while leading is expected.

Defensive metrics

All situations · lower against rates rank higher

Suppression & events	Team	Percentile	Rank
	0.071		6 / 3284th
	2.75		2 / 3297th
	1.90		1 / 3299th
	54.61		4 / 3290th
	14.38		18 / 3245th
	20.89		14 / 3258th
	4.43		25 / 3223rd
	16.12		25 / 3223rd

Context · not graded

Goaltending

All situations · goals saved above expected per goalie · empty-net goals excluded

Goalie	GP	GS	Start share	W-L-OTL	SV%	xGA	GSAx
Akira Schmid	34	29	35.4%	16-10-6	.893	79.7	-5.3
Adin Hill	27	27	32.9%	10-9-6	.871	62.6	-13.4
Carter Hart	18	18	22.0%	11-3-3	.891	45.6	-0.4
Carl Lindbom	8	8	9.8%	2-4-2	.873	21.7	-2.3
Team		82				—	-21.5

Team GSAx -21.5 (30th in NHL); the goalie rows sum to it.

Discipline

Official counts · all situations

Penalties taken / GP: 3.09
Penalties drawn / GP: 3.44
Differential / GP: 0.35
PIM / GP: 7.43

Shot locations

Unblocked attempts for and against · chance tiers are model goal probability: high ≥ 0.20, medium ≥ 0.08

Situation

Chances:

View:

Shot type

Shots for 3594 attempts · 271.7 xG

Shots against 3194 attempts · 225.5 xG

Finishing evidence

255 goals on 261.0 xG (-6.0). Finishing 7.1% vs 7.3% expected per unblocked attempt.

Goaltending evidence

231 goals allowed on 209.5 xG against (-21.5 saved above expected).

High-danger for: 220
High-danger against: 156
Rebound shots: 390 – 318
Rebound xG: 31.8 – 24.2

Zones, for

Zone	Att	G	xG	Goal rate / exp.	G−xG
Outer slot	223	29	18.1	13.0% / 8.1%	+10.9
Inner slot	868	116	115.0	13.4% / 13.2%	+1.0
Right circle	207	7	6.3	3.4% / 3.0%	+0.7
Below goal line	46	2	1.6	4.3% / 3.4%	+0.4
Left circle	246	6	8.7	2.4% / 3.5%	−2.7
Point	1,030	14	19.0	1.4% / 1.8%	−5.0
High slot	951	81	92.5	8.5% / 9.7%	−11.5
All zones	3,571	255	261.0	7.1% / 7.3%	−6.0

Zones, against

Zone	Att	GA	xGA	Goal rate / exp.	Prevented
Left circle	269	5	8.5	1.9% / 3.2%	+3.5
Outer slot	195	13	15.5	6.7% / 7.9%	+2.5
Below goal line	57	2	2.1	3.5% / 3.7%	+0.1
Right circle	247	9	7.8	3.6% / 3.1%	−1.2
Point	879	20	16.5	2.3% / 1.9%	−3.5
High slot	908	89	85.2	9.8% / 9.4%	−3.8
Inner slot	611	93	74.0	15.2% / 12.1%	−19.0
All zones	3,166	231	209.5	7.3% / 6.6%	−21.5

Sorted by goals against expectation. Empty-net attempts are left out, as in the evidence lines above.

Shot types, for

Type	Att	Share	G	xG	Sh%	G−xG
Wrist	1727	48.1%	122	125.6	10.3	-3.6
Snap	723	20.1%	67	63.4	13.6	+3.6
Slap	414	11.5%	16	18.5	6.1	-2.5
Tip-in	344	9.6%	19	30.0	10.3	-11.0
Backhand	262	7.3%	30	23.7	17.2	+6.3
Deflected	67	1.9%	4	6.4	9.5	-2.4
Bat	27	0.8%	1	2.1	8.3	-1.1
Wrap-around	18	0.5%	3	1.2	27.3	+1.8
Poke	8	0.2%	2	0.6	33.3	+1.4
Between-legs	4	0.1%	0	0.3	0.0	-0.3

Shot density

Loading…

Power play

Official percentage · rates use our scope, including 5v3, 4v3 and 6v4

PP%: 24.6%
Opportunities / GP: 2.88
Net PP goals: 53

Power play rates	Team	Percentile	Rank
	9.80		3 / 3294th
	9.62		3 / 3294th
	108.76		7 / 3281st
	-1.11		10 / 3271st

Penalty kill

Official percentage · rates use our scope, including 5v3, 4v3 and 6v4

PK%: 81.4%
Times shorthanded / GP: 2.49
Net PK goals: -32

Penalty kill rates	Team	Percentile	Rank
	6.86		2 / 3297th
	6.75		8 / 3277th
	96.67		10 / 3271st
	-0.60		23 / 3229th

Record splits

W–L–OTL, points % and goals per game · rest counts days off before the game; the playoff field is the standings' top three per division plus two wild cards

Split	GP	W–L–OTL	PTS	P%	GF/GP	GA/GP
Venue
Home	41	20–12–9	49	59.8%	3.56	3.10
Away	41	19–14–8	46	56.1%	2.90	3.00
Opponent
vs Western	50	25–15–10	60	60.0%	3.46	3.00
vs Eastern	32	14–11–7	35	54.7%	2.88	3.13
vs own division	26	15–5–6	36	69.2%	3.92	2.88
vs playoff teams	39	12–17–10	34	43.6%	2.85	3.49
vs non-playoff teams	43	27–9–7	61	70.9%	3.58	2.65
Game state
One-goal games	43	16–10–17	49	57.0%	2.95	3.21
Scoring first	34	23–4–7	53	77.9%	3.88	2.47
Allowing first	48	16–22–10	42	43.8%	2.77	3.46
Recent
Last 10	10	7–0–3	17	85.0%	4.00	2.50
Rest
Back-to-back	12	8–2–2	18	75.0%	3.92	2.92
1 day of rest	52	22–19–11	55	52.9%	3.12	3.10
2+ days of rest	17	9–5–3	21	61.8%	3.00	2.82

By period

Goals for and against · a shootout decider counts as an overtime goal

1st period6280

2nd period8692

3rd period10861

Overtime917

For Against

Forward lines

Five-on-five · the four lines with the most time together, from shift charts

Line	TOI	xG share	GF–GA	CF%	Team without them
Stone – Barbashev – Eichel	366:28	60.4%	28–15	55.2%	54.3%
Hertl – Marner – Dorofeyev	326:15	62.9%	12–7	60.9%	54.4%
Barbashev – Eichel – Bowman	259:54	55.6%	12–14	51.0%	54.9%
Smith – Marner – Dorofeyev	161:20	55.7%	7–3	55.7%	54.9%

Defense pairs

Five-on-five · the three pairs with the most time together

Pair	TOI	xG share	GF–GA	CF%	Team without them
McNabb – Theodore	850:42	56.8%	34–26	55.1%	54.4%
Hanifin – Whitecloud	449:10	52.7%	17–20	53.1%	55.2%
Hanifin – Andersson	435:34	56.1%	22–18	51.8%	54.8%

Units are found from the skaters on the ice for the club’s five-on-five shot events; time together intersects their shifts with five-on-five play. Team without them is the club’s five-on-five xG share with that unit off the ice.

Loading…

Leaders

This club’s games only · season totals and average ice time

Points: 90
Goals: 37
Assists: 63
Ice time: 22:50
GSAx: −0.4

Skaters

This club’s games only · P/60 and 5v5 xG share use this stint; grade is the full season

Position:

			Games	Scoring			Discipline		Shots		Time	Model
#	Player	Pos	GP	G	A	P	+/−	PIM	SOG	S%	ATOI	P/60	5v5 xG%	Grade
9	Jack Eichel	C	74	27	63	90	+23	18	260	10.4%	21:12	3.44	58.7	A+
93	Mitch Marner	R	81	24	56	80	+17	24	165	14.5%	19:57	2.97	58.2	A
61	Mark Stone	R	60	28	45	73	+26	9	130	21.5%	19:13	3.80	60.5	A+
16	Pavel Dorofeyev	R	82	37	27	64	-3	24	230	16.1%	17:36	2.66	57.3	A+
49	Ivan Barbashev	L	82	23	38	61	+20	14	133	17.3%	16:15	2.75	55.8	A−
48	Tomas Hertl	C	82	24	34	58	-17	39	202	11.9%	17:02	2.49	55.8	A+
27	Shea Theodore	D	70	10	29	39	+19	24	130	7.7%	22:50	1.46	55.8	A
15	Noah Hanifin	D	71	3	25	28	0	14	135	2.2%	22:36	1.05	56.6	B+
19	Reilly Smith	R	69	16	10	26	-9	4	95	16.8%	13:41	1.65	50.2	C−
42	Braeden Bowman	R	54	8	18	26	-16	12	75	10.7%	14:08	2.04	52.6	B
21	Brett Howden	C	58	12	10	22	-9	41	66	18.2%	14:54	1.53	55.3	C+
4	Rasmus Andersson	D	33	7	10	17	+1	18	66	10.6%	21:42	1.42	55.4	A−
55	Keegan Kolesar	R	82	6	11	17	-14	55	67	9.0%	11:32	1.08	47.9	D
6	Kaedan Korczak	D	78	3	13	16	+6	26	60	5.0%	15:58	0.77	57.4	B
17	Ben Hutton	D	55	6	9	15	+2	19	71	8.5%	14:35	1.12	55.4	B−
5	Jeremy Lauzon	D	68	1	12	13	-3	89	73	1.4%	17:11	0.67	52.1	C+
3	Brayden McNabb	D	63	5	7	12	+2	26	81	6.2%	20:31	0.56	55.4	B
10	Colton Sissons	C	66	6	5	11	-11	28	74	8.1%	12:30	0.80	50.0	D
20	Brandon Saad	L	49	3	6	9	-7	14	78	3.8%	13:23	0.82	54.7	B−
26	Alexander Holtz	R	28	3	6	9	-1	10	30	10.0%	11:29	1.68	49.9	—
2	Zach Whitecloud	D	47	2	5	7	-8	20	33	6.1%	18:46	0.48	50.1	F
23	Cole Reinhardt	L	44	3	4	7	-6	19	34	8.8%	9:47	0.98	50.6	D
26	Nic Dowd	C	20	1	4	5	+2	20	18	5.6%	11:46	1.28	54.2	F
22	Cole Smith	R	21	2	0	2	0	9	18	11.1%	11:38	0.49	56.8	F

Goalies

GSAx: goals saved above expected, all situations, empty-net goals excluded.

		Games		Record			Shots faced		Goals allowed		Model
#	Goalie	GP	GS	W	L	OTL	SA	SV%	GA	GAA	GSAx
40	Akira Schmid	34	29	16	10	6	791	.893	85	2.59	-5.3
79	Carter Hart	18	18	11	3	3	422	.891	46	2.71	-0.4
33	Adin Hill	27	27	10	9	6	587	.871	76	3.04	-13.4
30	Carl Lindbom	8	8	2	4	2	189	.873	24	3.00	-2.3

2025–26 playoffs

Playoff games only · no league ranks, since too few clubs play for a fair comparison

Record: 14-8
Series won: 3
Goals: 76–62
xG share: 54.0%
Shots: 584–640

Series

Round	Opponent	Result	Games
Round 1	UTA	Won 4–2	6
Round 2	ANA	Won 4–2	6
Round 3	COL	Won 4–0	4
Stanley Cup Final	CAR	Lost 2–4	6

Leading scorers

Player	GP	G	A	P
Mitch Marner	22	10	19	29
Jack Eichel	22	2	20	22
Brett Howden	22	14	4	18
Shea Theodore	22	6	12	18
Pavel Dorofeyev	22	12	4	16
Ivan Barbashev	22	6	8	14

Goaltending

Goalie	GP	W-L	SV%	GAA
Carter Hart	22	14-8	.909	2.56

Playoff games

2025–26 · playoffs · every finished game

Games:

Venue:

Date	Opponent	Result	SOG	SA	Shot diff	xGF%	Starting goalie
Jun 14	vs CAR	L 0–3	22	23	-1	46.7%	Carter Hart
Jun 11	@ CAR	L 2–4	25	24	+1	48.0%	Carter Hart
Jun 9	vs CAR	L 3–5	21	28	-7	53.6%	Carter Hart
Jun 6	vs CAR	W 5–4 OT	35	33	+2	49.6%	Carter Hart
Jun 4	@ CAR	L 3–4 OT	26	26	0	49.9%	Carter Hart
Jun 2	@ CAR	W 5–4	23	29	-6	59.8%	Carter Hart
May 26	vs COL	W 2–1	26	21	+5	61.1%	Carter Hart
May 24	vs COL	W 5–3	23	35	-12	52.0%	Carter Hart
May 22	@ COL	W 3–1	25	31	-6	59.1%	Carter Hart
May 20	@ COL	W 4–2	28	38	-10	61.2%	Carter Hart
May 14	@ ANA	W 5–1	21	32	-11	54.1%	Carter Hart
May 12	vs ANA	W 3–2 OT	32	36	-4	53.4%	Carter Hart
May 10	@ ANA	L 3–4	21	23	-2	44.8%	Carter Hart
May 8	@ ANA	W 6–2	28	33	-5	59.4%	Carter Hart
May 6	vs ANA	L 1–3	22	28	-6	37.3%	Carter Hart
May 4	vs ANA	W 3–1	22	34	-12	50.7%	Carter Hart
May 1	@ UTA	W 5–1	26	23	+3	57.3%	Carter Hart
Apr 29	vs UTA	W 5–4 OT	38	38	0	52.2%	Carter Hart
Apr 27	@ UTA	W 5–4 OT	36	31	+5	62.0%	Carter Hart
Apr 24	@ UTA	L 2–4	32	12	+20	66.8%	Carter Hart
Apr 21	vs UTA	L 2–3	21	29	-8	39.6%	Carter Hart
Apr 19	vs UTA	W 4–2	31	33	-2	62.8%	Carter Hart
22 games		14–8	26.5	29.1	-2.5	54.0%

Summary: record, average SOG and SA per game, pooled xG share and power-play total for the filtered games.

Every playoff run

The club's recorded playoff runs, newest first · a playoff overtime loss is a loss

Season	GP
2025–26	22
2024–25	11
2023–24	7
2022–23	22
2020–21	27
2019–20	12
2018–19	7
2017–18	20

2025–26 · regular season · every finished game

Games:

Venue:

Date	Opponent	Result	SOG	SA	Shot diff	xGF%	PP	Starting goalie
Apr 15	vs SEA	W 4–1	26	23	+3	68.5%	0/2	Carter Hart
Apr 13	vs WPG	W 6–2	38	23	+15	58.8%	2/7	Carter Hart
Apr 11	@ COL	W 3–2 OT	29	32	-3	49.0%	1/4	Carter Hart
Apr 9	@ SEA	OTL 3–4 SO	35	33	+2	52.5%	1/1	Adin Hill
Apr 7	@ VAN	W 2–1	29	11	+18	71.3%	0/1	Carter Hart
Apr 4	@ EDM	W 5–1	33	32	+1	46.8%	1/2	Carter Hart
Apr 2	vs CGY	W 6–3	34	22	+12	64.6%	1/6	Carter Hart
Mar 30	vs VAN	W 4–2	34	24	+10	75.4%	0/2	Adin Hill
Mar 28	vs WSH	OTL 4–5 SO	29	22	+7	58.8%	1/3	Adin Hill
Mar 26	vs EDM	OTL 3–4 OT	29	29	0	55.4%	0/3	Adin Hill
10 games		7–0–3	31.6	25.1	6.5	60.1%	7/31

Summary: record, average SOG and SA per game, pooled xG share and power-play total for the filtered games.

Official record and season-level team metrics · cells shaded by league percentile that season

Season	GP	Record	PTS	GF	GA	Diff	P%	xGF%	CF%	GAx	PDO	PP%	PK%
2026–27 partial	10	8–2–0	16	42	24	+18	80.0	55.0	53.5	9.5	104.3	27.8	73.9
2025–26	82	39–26–17	95	265	250	+15	57.9	54.6	52.4	-6.0	99.0	24.6	81.4
2024–25	82	50–22–10	110	275	219	+56	67.1	55.0	50.9	-12.0	101.0	28.3	75.7
2023–24	82	45–29–8	98	267	245	+22	59.8	51.9	48.8	-3.1	100.6	20.2	79.3
2022–23	82	51–22–9	111	272	229	+43	67.7	52.0	48.6	-7.4	101.4	20.3	77.4
2021–22	82	43–31–8	94	266	248	+18	57.3	51.8	52.0	-16.7	99.3	18.4	77.4
2020–21	56	40–14–2	82	191	124	+67	73.2	56.6	54.0	3.2	102.4	17.8	86.8
2019–20	71	39–24–8	86	227	211	+16	60.6	54.5	53.9	-12.2	99.1	22.0	76.6

Bold marks the best full season in each column (PDO is context, so it is neither shaded nor marked). Shading uses each season’s league percentile on the five performance tiers; the in-progress season is partial.

Loading…

Every metric name opens its definition; the full list lives in Metrics.

Every section reads one season sample per situation. Five-on-five is official five-on-five strength; power play and penalty kill include 5v3, 4v3 and 6v4, and plain 6v5 is Other. Other is all situations minus the three, so situation rows sum. Power play and penalty kill are read from this team’s side, so shots against on the power play are the opponent’s shorthanded chances.

The situation filter (all situations or five-on-five) sets Season metrics, Season vs reference, On-ice rates and the Defense suppression rows, and opens the shot map on the same choice; the shot map’s own Situation select adds power play and penalty kill. The header, the percentile radar, Results, goaltending, discipline, Special teams, Form, Roster, Game log and Seasons keep the scope their own labels state.

Team ice time is the elapsed team clock from shift charts. Per-60 rates use only games with a complete clock and appear when at least 90% of games have one. Power-play opportunities, times shorthanded, penalty minutes, hits, blocks, giveaways, takeaways and faceoffs are official team box counts from the NHL game summary; official PP% and PK% use them.

Goals above expected and GSAx exclude empty-net goals. Shot-type shooting percentage is goals divided by shots on goal. High danger everywhere on this page, ranked rows and the shot-map tier filter alike, is model scoring probability of at least 0.20 (medium at least 0.08). PDO is ranked high to low but is context, not a quality grade.

One-goal games include overtime and shootout decisions, and scoring first uses the first non-shootout goal. Shot callouts exclude shots on an empty net; attempts are unblocked, because blocked shots carry no location. Blocks and hits describe volume and time defending, so they are ranked but colored as context. Penalties count minor, major, bench and match events; misconducts and penalty shots are excluded.

Special-teams rates, shorthanded goals and net goals use the widened scopes above, which can differ from the official counts by a goal or two over a season. In Season vs reference, a change is colored by whether it helps the team, and Points % appears only in all situations. Season metrics leaves out the rows the Defense table shows and, in all situations, the rows the header shows.

An em dash means unavailable, not zero. A partial season remains partial. Percentiles and ranks need at least 20 teams.

Explore the full methodology →

Season performanceAll situations · league percentiles, reference and ranked metricsCollapse

League percentile profile

Season metrics

Season vs reference

League percentile profile

Season metrics

Season vs reference

Results & record39–26–17 record · 95 points in 82 gamesExplore

Points pace

Standings

On-ice resultsAverage 3.25 expected goals for per 60 in all situations (11th of 32)Explore

Results vs expected

By situation

Score state

Defense & goaltendingElite 2.75 expected goals against per game in all situations (2nd of 32)Explore

Defensive metrics

Goaltending

Discipline

Shooting & finishingAverage -6.0 goals above expected in all situations (14th of 32)Explore

Shot locations

Finishing evidence

Goaltending evidence

Zones, for

Zones, against

Shot types, for

Shot density

Special teamsPP · PKPower play: 24.6% (6th) · Penalty kill: 81.4% (7th)Explore

Power play

Penalty kill

FormHot 60.1% xG share over the last 10 games vs 54.6% this season, 7–0–3Explore

Recent form

SplitsHome 20–12–9 · Away 19–14–8Explore

Record splits

By period

Lines & pairs5v5The most-used five-on-five forward lines and defense pairsExplore

Forward lines

Defense pairs

Roster35 active skatersExplore

Leaders

Skaters

Goalies

PlayoffsLost in the Stanley Cup Final to CAR, 2–4 · 14-8 in 22 gamesExplore

2025–26 playoffs

Series

Leading scorers

Goaltending

Playoff games

Every playoff run

Game log82 GP · Last game: W 4–1 vs SEAExplore

Seasons8 NHL seasons trackedExplore

Data notesScopes, sources and missing valuesExplore

Score state

Forward lines

Defense pairs

Shot locations

Finishing evidence

Goaltending evidence

Zones, for

Zones, against

Shot types, for

League percentile profile

Season metrics

Season vs reference