Central Division · Western2021–2245-30-797 PTS
Excellent finishing, but they struggle to generate offense and bleed chances defensively — 3.03 expected goals for per game (20th of 32).
All situations · six composite axes against all 32 teams
Bands show league percentiles; axis labels show this season’s values.
Dashed outline: average NHL team this season. Outside = above average; inside = below average. All axes point outward for stronger results.
Team value: 3.03
League range: 2.48 – 3.87 / game
Team 3.03 · mean 3.18. Higher raw values rank higher.
Expected goals for per game.
All situations · against all 32 teams
| Results | Team | Percentile | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 51.4 | 15 / 32 |
Team value: 51.35
League range: 39.81 – 58.48 %
Team 51.35 · mean 49.97. Higher raw values rank higher.
Goals for divided by goals for plus against.
| Shot share | Team | Percentile | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 48.0 | 22 / 32 | ||
| 48.5 | 19 / 32 | ||
| 48.9 | 19 / 32 | ||
| 48.0 | 21 / 32 | ||
| 44.9 | 24 / 32 |
Team value: 48.03
League range: 40.72 – 57.30 %
Team 48.03 · mean 49.94. Higher raw values rank higher.
Expected goals for divided by expected goals for plus against, raw model values.
| Chance volume | Team | Percentile | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3.03 | 20 / 32 | ||
| 54.91 | 19 / 32 | ||
| 1.62 | 26 / 32 |
Team value: 3.03
League range: 2.48 – 3.87 / game
Team 3.03 · mean 3.18. Higher raw values rank higher.
Expected goals for per game.
| Finishing & goaltending | Team | Percentile | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10.7 | 6 / 32 | ||
| 90.6 | 12 / 32 | ||
| 101.29 | 8 / 32 | ||
| 13.29 | 5 / 32 | ||
| 22.28 | 11 / 32 |
Above averageNear averageBelow averageBars and shaded cells show peer percentile, so more is always better · tick at the 50th
Team value: 10.74
League range: 8.20 – 12.40 %
Team 10.74 · mean 9.81. Higher raw values rank higher.
Goals divided by shots on goal.
All situations · this season against a reference
| Metric | This season | 2020–21 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| % | 59.1 | 57.1 | +2.0 |
| / GP | 3.24 | 2.79 | +0.46 |
| / GP | 3.07 | 2.75 | +0.32 |
| / GP | 0.17 | 0.04 | +0.13 |
| / GP | 3.03 | 2.67 | +0.37 |
| / GP | 3.28 | 2.95 | +0.33 |
| % | 48.0 | 47.4 | +0.6 |
| % | 48.5 | 49.7 | -1.2 |
| % | 44.9 | 46.4 | -1.5 |
| % | 10.7 | 9.0 | +1.7 |
| % | 90.6 | 91.2 | -0.7 |
| index | 101.29 | 100.21 | +1.08 |
| goals | 13.29 | 4.13 | +9.15 |
| goals | 22.28 | 12.93 | +9.35 |
Cumulative standings points by game against a 96-point pace over 82 games
Oct 14, 2021 · vs SEA
97 points after 82 games; the pace line expects 96.0 (+1.0).
W-L-OTL and points % · overtime and shootout losses earn one point
| Split | GP | W-L-OTL | PTS | P% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home | 41 | 25-14-2 | 52 | 63.4 |
| Away | 41 | 20-16-5 | 45 | 54.9 |
| vs Eastern | 32 | 15-14-3 | 33 | 51.6 |
| vs Western | 50 | 30-16-4 | 64 | 64.0 |
| vs own division | 26 | 16-8-2 | 34 | 65.4 |
| One-goal games | 36 | 21-8-7 | 49 | 68.1 |
| Scoring first | 43 | 32-9-2 | 66 | 76.7 |
| Allowing first | 39 | 13-21-5 | 31 | 39.7 |
| Last 10 | 10 | 4-4-2 | 10 | 50.0 |
All situations · goals and expected goals per 60 of clocked team ice time · all 32 teams
Per-60 rates pending: team ice time covers under 90% of games.
Season totals; Other is all situations minus 5v5, PP and PK, so rows sum to all situations.
| Situation | TOI / GP | GF | GA | xGF | xGA | xG diff | xGF% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Five-on-five | — | 165 | 156 | 163.1 | 166.7 | -3.6 | 49.5 |
| Power play | — | 63 | 5 | 48.2 | 7.4 | +40.8 | 86.7 |
| Penalty kill | — | 2 | 58 | 4.6 | 64.1 | -59.5 | 6.8 |
| Other | — | 36 | 33 | 32.8 | 30.9 | +1.9 | 51.5 |
| All situations | — | 266 | 252 | 248.7 | 269.1 | -20.4 | 48.0 |
Goals for and against · a shootout decider counts as an overtime goal
Loading…
All situations · lower against rates rank higher
| Suppression & events | Team | Percentile | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.074 | 16 / 32 | ||
| 3.28 | 20 / 32 | ||
| 1.99 | 17 / 32 | ||
| 58.28 | 21 / 32 | ||
| 14.15 | 11 / 32 | ||
| 30.12 | 1 / 32 | ||
| 6.52 | 22 / 32 | ||
| 9.32 | T19 / 32 |
Team value: 0.07
League range: 0.07 – 0.08 xG / unblocked attempt
Team 0.07 · mean 0.07. Lower raw values are better.
Expected goals against divided by unblocked attempts against: the average quality of chances allowed.
All situations · goals saved above expected per goalie · empty-net goals excluded
| Goalie | GP | GS | Start share | W-L-OTL | SV% | xGA | GSAx |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Juuse Saros | 67 | 67 | 81.7% | 38-25-3 | 0.918 | 205.3 | +32.3 |
| David Rittich | 17 | 12 | 14.6% | 6-3-4 | 0.889 | 42.3 | -6.7 |
| Connor Ingram | 3 | 3 | 3.7% | 1-2-0 | 0.879 | 7.7 | -3.3 |
| Team | 82 | — | +22.3 |
Team saves above expected +22.3 (11th in NHL); the goalie rows sum to it.
Official counts · all situations
Official percentage · rates use our scope, including 5v3, 4v3 and 6v4
| Power play rates | Team | Percentile | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 14.78 | 1 / 32 |
Team value: 14.78
League range: -14.55 – 14.78 goals
Team 14.78 · mean 1.11. Higher raw values rank higher.
Goals for minus expected goals for in this situation.
Per-60 rates pending: team ice time covers under 90% of games.
Official percentage · rates use our scope, including 5v3, 4v3 and 6v4
| Penalty kill rates | Team | Percentile | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| -6.13 | 6 / 32 |
Team value: -6.13
League range: -11.31 – 11.93 goals
Team -6.13 · mean 1.11. Lower raw values are better.
Goals against minus expected goals against in this situation.
Per-60 rates pending: team ice time covers under 90% of games.
10-game pooled xG share · goal differential by game, colored by result
Latest 10-game xG share 48.8%. Hover a bar for the game.
Win OT/SO loss Regulation loss
Regular-season games only.
This club’s games only · P/60 and 5v5 xG share use this stint; grade is the full season
| Games | Scoring | Discipline | Shots | Time | Model | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | Player | Pos | GP | G | A | P | +/− | PIM | SOG | S% | ATOI | P/60 | 5v5 xG% | Grade |
| 59 |  Roman Josi | D | 80 | 23 | 73 | 96 | +13 | 46 | 281 | 8.2% | 25:33 | 2.82 | 51.1 | — |
| 95 |  Matt Duchene | C | 78 | 43 | 43 | 86 | +6 | 38 | 228 | 18.9% | 19:01 | 3.48 | 54.0 | — |
| 9 |  Filip Forsberg | L | 69 | 42 | 42 | 84 | +12 | 22 | 226 | 18.6% | 18:06 | 4.04 | 56.0 | — |
| 64 |  Mikael Granlund | C | 80 | 11 | 53 | 64 | -9 | 33 | 117 | 9.4% | 20:25 | 2.35 | 50.9 | — |
| 92 |  Ryan Johansen | C | 79 | 26 | 37 | 63 | -2 | 53 | 118 | 22.0% | 16:34 | 2.89 | 46.0 | — |
| 84 |  Tanner Jeannot | L | 81 | 24 | 17 | 41 | +2 | 130 | 124 | 19.4% | 15:59 | 1.90 | 47.8 | — |
| 26 |  Philip Tomasino | R | 76 | 11 | 21 | 32 | +2 | 10 | 111 | 9.9% | 11:32 | 2.19 | 51.4 | — |
| 14 |  Mattias Ekholm | D | 76 | 6 | 25 | 31 | +14 | 44 | 145 | 4.1% | 23:29 | 1.04 | 47.5 | — |
| 45 |  Alexandre Carrier | D | 77 | 3 | 27 | 30 | +26 | 50 | 95 | 3.2% | 20:59 | 1.11 | 48.8 | — |
| 10 |  Colton Sissons | C | 79 | 7 | 21 | 28 | +2 | 30 | 87 | 8.0% | 16:10 | 1.32 | 48.7 | — |
| 13 |  Yakov Trenin | C | 80 | 17 | 7 | 24 | +7 | 46 | 136 | 12.5% | 14:40 | 1.23 | 49.6 | — |
| 57 |  Dante Fabbro | D | 66 | 3 | 21 | 24 | +13 | 24 | 88 | 3.4% | 19:03 | 1.15 | 51.2 | — |
| 28 |  Eeli Tolvanen | R | 75 | 11 | 12 | 23 | -7 | 16 | 151 | 7.3% | 13:26 | 1.37 | 48.8 | — |
| 21 |  Nick Cousins | C | 68 | 9 | 13 | 22 | -8 | 31 | 103 | 8.7% | 12:28 | 1.56 | 47.3 | — |
| 11 |  Luke Kunin | C | 82 | 13 | 9 | 22 | -11 | 99 | 125 | 10.4% | 13:50 | 1.16 | 43.1 | — |
| 47 |  Michael McCarron | C | 51 | 7 | 7 | 14 | +10 | 70 | 51 | 13.7% | 10:23 | 1.59 | 48.6 | — |
| 5 |  Matt Benning | D | 65 | 0 | 11 | 11 | -24 | 39 | 61 | 0.0% | 16:20 | 0.62 | 49.1 | — |
| 82 |  Tommy Novak | C | 27 | 1 | 6 | 7 | -4 | 2 | 25 | 4.0% | 11:48 | 1.32 | 52.2 | — |
| 24 |  Matt Luff | R | 23 | 3 | 3 | 6 | +3 | 4 | 26 | 11.5% | 9:24 | 1.66 | 47.5 | — |
| 90 |  Mark Borowiecki | D | 57 | 0 | 4 | 4 | -9 | 151 | 45 | 0.0% | 13:07 | 0.32 | 50.7 | — |
| 55 |  Philippe Myers | D | 27 | 1 | 3 | 4 | +5 | 12 | 28 | 3.6% | 14:53 | 0.60 | 44.9 | — |
GSAx: goals saved above expected, all situations, empty-net goals excluded.
| Games | Record | Shots faced | Goals allowed | Model | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | Goalie | GP | GS | W | L | OTL | SA | SV% | GA | GAA | GSAx |
| 74 |  Juuse Saros | 67 | 67 | 38 | 25 | 3 | 2107 | .918 | 173 | 2.64 | +32.3 |
| 33 |  David Rittich | 17 | 12 | 6 | 3 | 4 | 431 | .889 | 49 | 3.57 | -6.7 |
| 39 |  Connor Ingram | 3 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 91 | .879 | 11 | 3.71 | -3.3 |
Playoff games only · no league ranks, since too few clubs play for a fair comparison
| Round | Opponent | Result | Games |
|---|---|---|---|
| Round 1 | COL | Lost 0–4 | 4 |
| Player | GP | G | A | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Matt Duchene | 4 | 3 | 1 | 4 |
| Yakov Trenin | 4 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| Alexandre Carrier | 4 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Mikael Granlund | 4 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Roman Josi | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Mattias Ekholm | 4 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Goalie | GP | W-L | SV% | GAA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Connor Ingram | 4 | 0-3 | .913 | 3.64 |
| David Rittich | 1 | 0-1 | .615 | 19.91 |
2021–22 · playoffs · every finished game
| Date | Opponent | Score | Result | SOG | SA | Shot diff | xGF% | PP | Starting goalie |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 9 | vs COL | 3–5 | L | 31 | 38 | -7 | 38.1 | — | Connor Ingram |
| May 7 | vs COL | 3–7 | L | 30 | 42 | -12 | 30.9 | — | Connor Ingram |
| May 5 | @ COL | 1–2 | L (OT) | 26 | 51 | -25 | 34.0 | — | Connor Ingram |
| May 3 | @ COL | 2–7 | L | 25 | 45 | -20 | 30.7 | — | David Rittich |
| 4 games | 0-4 | 28.0 | 44.0 | -16.0 | 33.2 | — | |||
Summary: record, average SOG and SA per game, pooled xG share and power-play total for the filtered games.
2021–22 · regular season · every finished game
| Date | Opponent | Score | Result | SOG | SA | Shot diff | xGF% | PP | Starting goalie |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29 | @ ARI | 4–5 | L | 33 | 27 | +6 | 61.2 | 0/2 | Connor Ingram |
| Apr 28 | @ COL | 5–4 | W (SO) | 37 | 46 | -9 | 43.0 | 1/4 | David Rittich |
| Apr 26 | vs CGY | 4–5 | OTL (OT) | 23 | 38 | -15 | 35.8 | 2/7 | Juuse Saros |
| Apr 24 | vs MIN | 4–5 | OTL (OT) | 25 | 47 | -22 | 38.0 | 2/5 | David Rittich |
| Apr 23 | @ TBL | 2–6 | L | 21 | 39 | -18 | 35.6 | 2/4 | Juuse Saros |
| Apr 19 | vs CGY | 3–2 | W (SO) | 27 | 21 | +6 | 54.5 | 1/5 | Juuse Saros |
| Apr 17 | vs STL | 3–8 | L | 36 | 33 | +3 | 49.3 | 0/2 | Juuse Saros |
| Apr 16 | vs CHI | 4–3 | W | 34 | 31 | +3 | 63.4 | 1/2 | Juuse Saros |
| Apr 14 | vs EDM | 0–4 | L | 30 | 32 | -2 | 54.0 | 0/3 | Juuse Saros |
| Apr 12 | vs SJS | 1–0 | W (OT) | 41 | 25 | +16 | 60.4 | 0/2 | Juuse Saros |
| Apr 10 | @ PIT | 2–3 | OTL (OT) | 35 | 30 | +5 | 52.0 | 0/4 | David Rittich |
| Apr 9 | vs FLA | 1–4 | L | 25 | 25 | 0 | 44.4 | 0/2 | Juuse Saros |
| Apr 7 | @ OTT | 3–2 | W | 34 | 29 | +5 | 43.2 | 1/4 | Juuse Saros |
| Apr 5 | vs MIN | 6–2 | W | 33 | 49 | -16 | 46.9 | 3/4 | Juuse Saros |
| Apr 1 | @ BUF | 3–4 | L | 25 | 35 | -10 | 39.7 | 0/1 | Juuse Saros |
| Mar 29 | vs OTT | 4–1 | W | 32 | 37 | -5 | 55.0 | 0/2 | Juuse Saros |
| Mar 27 | vs PHI | 5–4 | W | 35 | 23 | +12 | 64.1 | 0/2 | Juuse Saros |
| Mar 24 | @ VGK | 1–6 | L | 36 | 50 | -14 | 39.9 | 1/3 | Juuse Saros |
| Mar 22 | @ LAK | 1–6 | L | 25 | 35 | -10 | 44.5 | 0/2 | David Rittich |
| Mar 21 | @ ANA | 6–3 | W | 31 | 29 | +2 | 54.9 | 3/5 | Juuse Saros |
| Mar 19 | vs TOR | 6–3 | W | 34 | 41 | -7 | 50.6 | 1/4 | Juuse Saros |
| Mar 17 | @ PHI | 4–5 | L | 34 | 33 | +1 | 38.3 | 1/4 | Juuse Saros |
| Mar 15 | vs PIT | 4–1 | W | 25 | 36 | -11 | 42.0 | 0/5 | Juuse Saros |
| Mar 13 | @ MIN | 6–2 | W | 25 | 28 | -3 | 67.4 | 1/3 | David Rittich |
| Mar 12 | vs STL | 4–7 | L | 35 | 35 | 0 | 37.6 | 1/3 | Juuse Saros |
| Mar 10 | vs ANA | 4–1 | W | 30 | 28 | +2 | 55.9 | 1/2 | Juuse Saros |
| Mar 8 | vs DAL | 2–1 | W | 31 | 23 | +8 | 57.0 | 0/2 | Juuse Saros |
| Mar 5 | @ SJS | 8–0 | W | 36 | 20 | +16 | 61.5 | 1/4 | Juuse Saros |
| Mar 2 | @ SEA | 3–4 | L | 22 | 31 | -9 | 40.6 | 1/3 | Juuse Saros |
| Feb 26 | vs TBL | 2–3 | L | 28 | 33 | -5 | 44.7 | 2/4 | Juuse Saros |
| Feb 24 | vs DAL | 2–1 | W (SO) | 20 | 28 | -8 | 34.2 | 0/5 | Juuse Saros |
| Feb 22 | @ FLA | 6–4 | W | 33 | 48 | -15 | 45.6 | 1/3 | David Rittich |
| Feb 18 | @ CAR | 3–5 | L | 31 | 30 | +1 | 39.0 | 0/3 | Juuse Saros |
| Feb 15 | vs WSH | 1–4 | L | 34 | 28 | +6 | 46.5 | 0/2 | Juuse Saros |
| Feb 12 | vs WPG | 2–5 | L | 36 | 43 | -7 | 34.3 | 1/3 | Juuse Saros |
| Feb 9 | @ DAL | 3–4 | L | 23 | 27 | -4 | 39.4 | 0/4 | Juuse Saros |
| Feb 1 | vs VAN | 4–2 | W | 28 | 32 | -4 | 55.8 | 1/3 | Juuse Saros |
| Jan 27 | @ EDM | 2–3 | OTL (SO) | 30 | 46 | -16 | 32.2 | 0/3 | Juuse Saros |
| Jan 25 | @ SEA | 4–2 | W | 27 | 35 | -8 | 46.4 | 1/4 | Juuse Saros |
| Jan 22 | vs DET | 4–1 | W | 25 | 29 | -4 | 62.7 | 1/3 | Juuse Saros |
| Jan 20 | vs WPG | 5–2 | W | 23 | 38 | -15 | 43.4 | 0/3 | Juuse Saros |
| Jan 18 | vs VAN | 1–3 | L | 32 | 24 | +8 | 52.8 | 1/2 | David Rittich |
| Jan 17 | @ STL | 3–5 | L | 35 | 29 | +6 | 62.7 | 0/4 | Juuse Saros |
| Jan 15 | @ BOS | 3–4 | OTL (OT) | 29 | 44 | -15 | 40.3 | 0/2 | Juuse Saros |
| Jan 13 | vs BUF | 1–4 | L | 30 | 21 | +9 | 45.5 | 1/4 | Juuse Saros |
| Jan 11 | vs COL | 5–4 | W (OT) | 32 | 44 | -12 | 55.0 | 2/5 | Juuse Saros |
| Jan 8 | @ ARI | 4–2 | W | 29 | 40 | -11 | 43.0 | 1/6 | Juuse Saros |
| Jan 6 | @ LAK | 4–2 | W | 20 | 48 | -28 | 45.0 | 2/3 | Juuse Saros |
| Jan 4 | @ VGK | 3–2 | W | 26 | 43 | -17 | 38.9 | 0/1 | Juuse Saros |
| Jan 1 | vs CHI | 6–1 | W | 25 | 38 | -13 | 45.1 | 2/3 | Juuse Saros |
| Dec 30 | @ CBJ | 3–4 | OTL (SO) | 34 | 29 | +5 | 46.4 | 1/3 | David Rittich |
| Dec 29 | @ WSH | 3–5 | L | 20 | 37 | -17 | 31.8 | 0/4 | Juuse Saros |
| Dec 17 | @ CHI | 3–2 | W (OT) | 31 | 19 | +12 | 52.4 | 2/5 | Juuse Saros |
| Dec 16 | vs COL | 5–2 | W | 35 | 26 | +9 | 59.4 | 2/5 | Juuse Saros |
| Dec 12 | @ NYR | 1–0 | W | 24 | 32 | -8 | 47.9 | 0/1 | Juuse Saros |
| Dec 10 | @ NJD | 3–2 | W | 27 | 31 | -4 | 48.1 | 1/2 | Juuse Saros |
| Dec 9 | @ NYI | 4–3 | W | 29 | 21 | +8 | 47.8 | 0/1 | David Rittich |
| Dec 7 | @ DET | 5–2 | W | 33 | 16 | +17 | 71.4 | 1/2 | David Rittich |
| Dec 4 | vs MTL | 4–3 | W (OT) | 44 | 23 | +21 | 63.8 | 0/5 | Juuse Saros |
| Dec 2 | vs BOS | 0–2 | L | 42 | 33 | +9 | 38.6 | 0/1 | Juuse Saros |
| Nov 30 | vs CBJ | 6–0 | W | 37 | 27 | +10 | 66.9 | 1/4 | Juuse Saros |
| Nov 27 | @ COL | 2–6 | L | 28 | 35 | -7 | 45.7 | 0/2 | David Rittich |
| Nov 26 | vs NJD | 4–2 | W | 31 | 25 | +6 | 60.1 | 0/3 | Juuse Saros |
| Nov 24 | vs VGK | 2–5 | L | 28 | 35 | -7 | 40.8 | 1/6 | Juuse Saros |
| Nov 22 | vs ANA | 3–2 | W | 35 | 31 | +4 | 51.4 | 1/4 | Juuse Saros |
| Nov 20 | @ MTL | 3–6 | L | 36 | 29 | +7 | 49.5 | 2/3 | Juuse Saros |
| Nov 16 | @ TOR | 0–3 | L | 24 | 34 | -10 | 29.9 | 0/1 | Juuse Saros |
| Nov 13 | vs ARI | 4–1 | W | 24 | 23 | +1 | 52.3 | 1/3 | Juuse Saros |
| Nov 11 | @ STL | 4–3 | W (OT) | 27 | 36 | -9 | 43.8 | 0/0 | David Rittich |
| Nov 10 | @ DAL | 4–2 | W | 22 | 27 | -5 | 49.3 | 0/1 | Juuse Saros |
| Nov 7 | @ CHI | 1–2 | OTL (OT) | 21 | 32 | -11 | 37.1 | 0/2 | Juuse Saros |
| Nov 5 | @ VAN | 3–2 | W | 28 | 28 | 0 | 49.8 | 2/3 | Juuse Saros |
| Nov 3 | @ EDM | 2–5 | L | 33 | 30 | +3 | 48.2 | 1/4 | Connor Ingram |
| Nov 2 | @ CGY | 3–2 | W (OT) | 22 | 40 | -18 | 23.4 | 0/2 | Juuse Saros |
| Oct 30 | vs NYI | 3–2 | W (SO) | 23 | 36 | -13 | 60.2 | 0/4 | Juuse Saros |
| Oct 26 | vs SJS | 3–1 | W | 26 | 29 | -3 | 51.0 | 1/1 | Juuse Saros |
| Oct 24 | @ MIN | 5–2 | W | 29 | 35 | -6 | 65.6 | 2/6 | Connor Ingram |
| Oct 23 | @ WPG | 4–6 | L | 30 | 29 | +1 | 46.1 | 2/4 | Juuse Saros |
| Oct 21 | vs NYR | 1–3 | L | 29 | 30 | -1 | 33.1 | 0/3 | Juuse Saros |
| Oct 19 | vs LAK | 2–1 | W | 31 | 26 | +5 | 76.1 | 1/2 | Juuse Saros |
| Oct 16 | vs CAR | 2–3 | L | 40 | 32 | +8 | 44.1 | 0/4 | Juuse Saros |
| Oct 14 | vs SEA | 3–4 | L | 30 | 26 | +4 | 56.3 | 1/2 | Juuse Saros |
| 82 games | 45-30-7 | 29.7 | 32.3 | -2.5 | 48.0 | 63/258 | |||
Summary: record, average SOG and SA per game, pooled xG share and power-play total for the filtered games.
Loading…
Every metric name opens its definition; the full list lives in Metrics.
Every section reads one season sample per situation. Five-on-five is official five-on-five strength; power play and penalty kill include 5v3, 4v3 and 6v4, and plain 6v5 is Other. Other is all situations minus the three, so situation rows sum. Power play and penalty kill are read from this team’s side, so shots against on the power play are the opponent’s shorthanded chances.
The situation filter (all situations or five-on-five) sets Season metrics, Season vs reference, On-ice rates and the Defense suppression rows, and opens the shot map on the same choice; the shot map’s own Situation select adds power play and penalty kill. The header, the percentile radar, Results, goaltending, discipline, Special teams, Form, Roster, Game log and Seasons keep the scope their own labels state.
Team ice time is the elapsed team clock from shift charts. Per-60 rates use only games with a complete clock and appear when at least 90% of games have one. Power-play opportunities, times shorthanded, penalty minutes, hits, blocks, giveaways, takeaways and faceoffs are official team box counts from the NHL game summary; official PP% and PK% use them.
Goals and saves above expected exclude empty-net goals. Shot-type shooting percentage is goals divided by shots on goal. High danger in ranked rows is model scoring probability of at least 0.20; the shot-map tier filter uses the player page’s location tiers. PDO is ranked high to low but is context, not a quality grade.
One-goal games include overtime and shootout decisions, and scoring first uses the first non-shootout goal. Shot callouts exclude shots on an empty net; attempts are unblocked, because blocked shots carry no location. Blocks and hits describe volume and time defending, so they are ranked but colored as context. Penalties count minor, major, bench and match events; misconducts and penalty shots are excluded.
Special-teams rates, shorthanded goals and net goals use the widened scopes above, which can differ from the official counts by a goal or two over a season. In Season vs reference, a change is colored by whether it helps the team, and Points % appears only in all situations. Season metrics leaves out the rows the Defense table shows and, in all situations, the rows the header shows.
An em dash means unavailable, not zero. A partial season remains partial. Percentiles and ranks need at least 20 teams.
Explore the full methodology →Unblocked attempts for and against · rinks use the player page’s geometric chance tiers
244 goals on 230.7 xG (+13.3). Finishing 7.1% vs 6.7% expected per unblocked attempt.
233 goals allowed on 255.3 xG against (+22.3 saved above expected).
| Zone | For | Against | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Att | xG | G | Att | xG | G | |
| High slot | 1074 | 101.3 | 89 | 1191 | 115.0 | 103 |
| Point | 1030 | 28.8 | 29 | 1017 | 29.5 | 23 |
| Inner slot | 627 | 85.0 | 117 | 623 | 84.6 | 91 |
| Right circle | 247 | 7.9 | 4 | 254 | 10.0 | 9 |
| Outer slot | 230 | 16.4 | 13 | 278 | 21.2 | 18 |
| Left circle | 216 | 6.8 | 5 | 232 | 7.5 | 5 |
| Below goal line | 33 | 2.5 | 5 | 24 | 1.4 | 1 |
| All zones | 3457 | 248.7 | 262 | 3619 | 269.1 | 250 |
| Type | Att | Share | G | xG | Sh% | G−xG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wrist | 1937 | 56.0% | 134 | 138.0 | 9.5 | -4.0 |
| Slap | 490 | 14.2% | 27 | 21.3 | 8.4 | +5.7 |
| Snap | 376 | 10.9% | 27 | 28.9 | 9.6 | -1.9 |
| Backhand | 241 | 7.0% | 31 | 24.5 | 16.4 | +6.5 |
| Deflected | 237 | 6.9% | 22 | 22.0 | 16.7 | +0.0 |
| Tip-in | 156 | 4.5% | 19 | 12.8 | 21.1 | +6.2 |
| Wrap-around | 20 | 0.6% | 2 | 1.2 | 15.4 | +0.8 |
Official record and season-level team metrics · cells shaded by league percentile that season
| Season | GP | Record | PTS | GF | GA | Diff | P% | xGF% | CF% | GAx | PDO | PP% | PK% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026–27 partial | 8 | 3-2-3 | 9 | 23 | 24 | -1 | 56.3 | 48.1 | 45.9 | 1.3 | 102.4 | 34.8 | 87.0 |
| 2025–26 | 82 | 38-34-10 | 86 | 247 | 269 | -22 | 52.4 | 47.4 | 50.4 | -9.0 | 99.6 | 23.1 | 81.7 |
| 2024–25 | 82 | 30-44-8 | 68 | 214 | 274 | -60 | 41.5 | 50.2 | 51.7 | -53.4 | 97.1 | 21.9 | 81.5 |
| 2023–24 | 82 | 47-30-5 | 99 | 269 | 248 | +21 | 60.4 ★ | 52.1 ★ | 52.0 ★ | -19.8 | 100.2 | 21.6 | 76.9 |
| 2022–23 | 82 | 42-32-8 | 92 | 229 | 238 | -9 | 56.1 | 45.8 | 47.5 | -39.1 | 100.6 | 17.6 | 82.5 ★ |
| 2021–22 | 82 | 45-30-7 | 97 | 266 | 252 | +14 | 59.1 | 48.0 | 48.5 | 13.3 ★ | 101.3 ★ | 24.4 ★ | 79.2 |
| 2020–21 | 56 | 31-23-2 | 64 | 156 | 154 | +2 | 57.1 | 47.4 | 49.7 | 4.1 | 100.2 | 17.6 | 75.6 |
| 2019–20 | 69 | 35-26-8 | 78 | 215 | 217 | -2 | 56.5 | 50.0 | 51.0 | 11.1 | 99.4 | 17.3 | 76.1 |
★ best full season in the table for that column (PDO is context). Shading uses each season’s league percentile; the in-progress season is partial.
