Central Division · Western2023–2447–30–599 PTS
Strong offense and possession — they just can't finish their chances, sitting at 19.8 goals below expected (24th of 32).
All situations · six composite axes against all 32 teams
Bands show league percentiles; axis labels show this season’s values.
Dashed outline: peer average, the average NHL team this season. Outside = above average; inside = below average. All axes point outward for stronger results.
Team value: 3.40
League range: 2.43 – 4.03 / game
Team 3.40 · mean 3.18. Higher raw values rank higher.
Expected goals for per game.
All situations · against all 32 teams
| Results | Team | Percentile | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 52.0 | 14 / 3258th |
Team value: 52.03
League range: 35.35 – 57.27 %
Team 52.03 · mean 49.99. Higher raw values rank higher.
Goals for divided by goals for plus against.
| Shot share | Team | Percentile | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 52.1 | 11 / 3268th | ||
| 52.0 | 7 / 3281st | ||
| 52.2 | 9 / 3274th | ||
| 51.3 | 14 / 3258th | ||
| 54.5 | 8 / 3277th |
Team value: 52.13
League range: 38.15 – 57.83 %
Team 52.13 · mean 49.98. Higher raw values rank higher.
Expected goals for divided by expected goals for plus against, raw model values.
| Chance volume | Team | Percentile | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3.40 | 9 / 3274th | ||
| 63.50 | 10 / 3271st | ||
| 2.30 | 14 / 3258th |
Team value: 3.40
League range: 2.43 – 4.03 / game
Team 3.40 · mean 3.18. Higher raw values rank higher.
Expected goals for per game.
| Finishing & goaltending | Team | Percentile | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10.1 | 16 / 3252nd | ||
| 90.1 | 12 / 3265th | ||
| 100.18 | 17 / 3248th | ||
| -19.78 | 24 / 3226th | ||
| 9.71 | 15 / 3255th |
Elite90+Strong70–89Average30–69Weak10–29Poor<10Context · not gradedBar length is the peer percentile, so longer is always better · tick at the 50th
Team value: 10.07
League range: 8.27 – 11.99 %
Team 10.07 · mean 10.16. Higher raw values rank higher.
Goals divided by shots on goal.
All situations · this season against a reference
| Metric | This season | 2022–23 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| % | 60.4 | 56.1 | +4.3 |
| / GP | 3.28 | 2.79 | +0.49 |
| / GP | 3.02 | 2.90 | +0.12 |
| / GP | 0.26 | -0.11 | +0.37 |
| / GP | 3.40 | 3.22 | +0.17 |
| / GP | 3.12 | 3.81 | -0.69 |
| % | 52.1 | 45.8 | +6.3 |
| % | 52.0 | 47.5 | +4.4 |
| % | 54.5 | 41.4 | +13.1 |
| % | 10.1 | 9.2 | +0.8 |
| % | 90.1 | 91.4 | -1.2 |
| index | 100.18 | 100.57 | -0.40 |
| goals | -19.78 | -39.14 | +19.36 |
| goals | 9.71 | 70.66 | -60.95 |
Cumulative standings points by game against a 96-point pace over 82 games
Oct 10, 2023 · at TBL
99 points after 82 games; the pace line expects 96.0 (+3.0).
Official standings as of Apr 18, 2024 · the playoff line is the first team out of the field (top three per division, two wild cards)
| Points behind the league leader | 15 |
|---|---|
| Points behind the Western leader | 14 |
| Points behind the Central leader | 14 |
| Points above the playoff line | +7 |
All situations · goals and expected goals per 60 of clocked team ice time · all 32 teams
Per-60 rates pending: team ice time covers under 90% of games.
Season totals; Other is all situations minus 5v5, PP and PK, so rows sum to all situations.
| Situation | TOI / GP | GF | GA | xGF | xGA | xG diff | xGF% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Five-on-five | — | 168 | 153 | 183.3 | 168.2 | +15.1 | 52.1 |
| Power play | — | 58 | 5 | 59.6 | 7.3 | +52.3 | 89.1 |
| Penalty kill | — | 7 | 58 | 6.8 | 52.7 | -45.9 | 11.4 |
| Other | — | 36 | 32 | 28.9 | 27.6 | +1.2 | 51.1 |
| All situations | — | 269 | 248 | 278.5 | 255.8 | +22.7 | 52.1 |
All situations · lower against rates rank higher
| Suppression & events | Team | Percentile | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.074 | 17 / 3248th | ||
| 3.12 | 16 / 3252nd | ||
| 1.93 | T-4 / 3290th | ||
| 58.70 | 10 / 3271st | ||
| 15.43 | 18 / 3245th | ||
| 26.21 | 5 / 3287th | ||
| 7.94 | 7 / 3281st | ||
| 9.29 | 27 / 3216th |
Context · not graded
Team value: 0.07
League range: 0.07 – 0.08 xG / unblocked attempt
Team 0.07 · mean 0.07. Lower raw values are better.
Expected goals against divided by unblocked attempts against: the average quality of chances allowed.
All situations · goals saved above expected per goalie · empty-net goals excluded
| Goalie | GP | GS | Start share | W-L-OTL | SV% | xGA | GSAx |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Juuse Saros | 64 | 64 | 78.0% | 35-24-5 | .906 | 176.5 | +3.5 |
| Kevin Lankinen | 24 | 17 | 20.7% | 11-6-0 | .908 | 60.4 | +4.4 |
| Yaroslav Askarov | 2 | 1 | 1.2% | 1-0-0 | .943 | 3.8 | +1.8 |
| Team | 82 | — | +9.7 |
Team GSAx +9.7 (15th in NHL); the goalie rows sum to it.
Official counts · all situations
Loading…
Official percentage · rates use our scope, including 5v3, 4v3 and 6v4
| Power play rates | Team | Percentile | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| -1.59 | 11 / 3268th |
Team value: -1.59
League range: -25.42 – 10.10 goals
Team -1.59 · mean -4.49. Higher raw values rank higher.
Goals for minus expected goals for in this situation.
Per-60 rates pending: team ice time covers under 90% of games.
Official percentage · rates use our scope, including 5v3, 4v3 and 6v4
| Penalty kill rates | Team | Percentile | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5.34 | 29 / 3210th |
Team value: 5.34
League range: -20.38 – 10.88 goals
Team 5.34 · mean -4.49. Lower raw values are better.
Goals against minus expected goals against in this situation.
Per-60 rates pending: team ice time covers under 90% of games.
Each game's xG share against an even 50%, with the result under each bar
Tiles cover the last 10 games. W, L and OTL under each bar are the result; OTL is an overtime or shootout loss.
W–L–OTL, points % and goals per game · rest counts days off before the game; the playoff field is the standings' top three per division plus two wild cards
| Split | GP | W–L–OTL | PTS | P% | GF/GP | GA/GP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Venue | ||||||
| Home | 41 | 23–16–2 | 48 | 58.5% | 3.29 | 3.07 |
| Away | 41 | 24–14–3 | 51 | 62.2% | 3.27 | 2.98 |
| Opponent | ||||||
| vs Eastern | 32 | 19–10–3 | 41 | 64.1% | 2.78 | 2.56 |
| vs Western | 50 | 28–20–2 | 58 | 58.0% | 3.60 | 3.32 |
| vs own division | 26 | 16–8–2 | 34 | 65.4% | 4.00 | 3.54 |
| vs playoff teams | 39 | 19–19–1 | 39 | 50.0% | 2.90 | 3.28 |
| vs non-playoff teams | 43 | 28–11–4 | 60 | 69.8% | 3.63 | 2.79 |
| Game state | ||||||
| One-goal games | 29 | 18–6–5 | 41 | 70.7% | 3.00 | 2.76 |
| Scoring first | 48 | 35–10–3 | 73 | 76.0% | 3.71 | 2.48 |
| Allowing first | 34 | 12–20–2 | 26 | 38.2% | 2.68 | 3.79 |
| Recent | ||||||
| Last 10 | 10 | 4–5–1 | 9 | 45.0% | 3.30 | 3.80 |
| Rest | ||||||
| Back-to-back | 9 | 8–0–1 | 17 | 94.4% | 3.22 | 2.00 |
| 1 day of rest | 47 | 25–19–3 | 53 | 56.4% | 3.26 | 3.11 |
| 2+ days of rest | 25 | 14–10–1 | 29 | 58.0% | 3.36 | 3.16 |
Goals for and against · a shootout decider counts as an overtime goal
Loading…
This club’s games only · season totals and average ice time
This club’s games only · P/60 and 5v5 xG share use this stint; grade is the full season
| Games | Scoring | Discipline | Shots | Time | Model | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | Player | Pos | GP | G | A | P | +/− | PIM | SOG | S% | ATOI | P/60 | 5v5 xG% | Grade |
| 9 |  Filip Forsberg | L | 82 | 48 | 46 | 94 | +16 | 43 | 347 | 13.8% | 18:54 | 3.64 | 53.6 | — |
| 59 |  Roman Josi | D | 82 | 23 | 62 | 85 | +12 | 45 | 268 | 8.6% | 24:38 | 2.53 | 53.8 | — |
| 14 |  Gustav Nyquist | R | 81 | 23 | 52 | 75 | +7 | 8 | 153 | 15.0% | 17:45 | 3.13 | 51.0 | — |
| 90 |  Ryan O'Reilly | C | 82 | 26 | 43 | 69 | +6 | 18 | 180 | 14.4% | 19:46 | 2.55 | 52.5 | — |
| 82 |  Tommy Novak | C | 71 | 18 | 27 | 45 | -3 | 8 | 113 | 15.9% | 14:12 | 2.68 | 59.4 | — |
| 77 |  Luke Evangelista | R | 80 | 16 | 23 | 39 | 0 | 18 | 172 | 9.3% | 13:57 | 2.10 | 58.0 | — |
| 10 |  Colton Sissons | C | 81 | 15 | 20 | 35 | -6 | 38 | 131 | 11.5% | 16:34 | 1.56 | 50.9 | — |
| 27 |  Ryan McDonagh | D | 74 | 3 | 29 | 32 | +19 | 31 | 91 | 3.3% | 21:47 | 1.19 | 56.8 | — |
| 44 |  Kiefer Sherwood | L | 68 | 10 | 17 | 27 | +17 | 41 | 110 | 9.1% | 12:10 | 1.96 | 51.6 | — |
| 36 |  Cole Smith | R | 80 | 9 | 14 | 23 | +5 | 63 | 112 | 8.0% | 13:41 | 1.26 | 48.2 | — |
| 47 |  Michael McCarron | C | 70 | 12 | 10 | 22 | +4 | 100 | 94 | 12.8% | 12:46 | 1.48 | 48.5 | — |
| 45 |  Alexandre Carrier | D | 73 | 4 | 16 | 20 | +7 | 44 | 77 | 5.2% | 18:48 | 0.87 | 51.6 | — |
| 26 |  Philip Tomasino | R | 41 | 7 | 13 | 20 | -6 | 25 | 62 | 11.3% | 12:34 | 2.33 | 51.6 | — |
| 22 |  Tyson Barrie | D | 41 | 1 | 14 | 15 | -10 | 16 | 65 | 1.5% | 18:19 | 1.20 | 43.5 | — |
| 17 |  Mark Jankowski | L | 32 | 7 | 8 | 15 | +11 | 8 | 48 | 14.6% | 12:40 | 2.22 | 65.2 | — |
| 3 |  Jeremy Lauzon | D | 79 | 6 | 8 | 14 | -3 | 98 | 103 | 5.8% | 18:37 | 0.57 | 48.0 | — |
| 13 |  Yakov Trenin | C | 60 | 10 | 4 | 14 | +12 | 38 | 94 | 10.6% | 15:04 | 0.93 | 49.9 | — |
| 57 |  Dante Fabbro | D | 56 | 3 | 10 | 13 | +9 | 24 | 65 | 4.6% | 16:21 | 0.85 | 52.8 | — |
| 8 |  Cody Glass | C | 41 | 6 | 7 | 13 | -9 | 20 | 82 | 7.3% | 13:26 | 1.42 | 43.1 | — |
| 75 |  Juuso Parssinen | C | 44 | 8 | 4 | 12 | -6 | 12 | 54 | 14.8% | 14:36 | 1.12 | 43.5 | — |
| 2 |  Luke Schenn | D | 63 | 1 | 6 | 7 | +1 | 43 | 81 | 1.2% | 15:11 | 0.44 | 52.1 | — |
| 24 |  Spencer Stastney | D | 20 | 2 | 2 | 4 | +9 | 4 | 11 | 18.2% | 15:59 | 0.75 | 53.1 | — |
GSAx: goals saved above expected, all situations, empty-net goals excluded.
| Games | Record | Shots faced | Goals allowed | Model | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | Goalie | GP | GS | W | L | OTL | SA | SV% | GA | GAA | GSAx |
| 74 |  Juuse Saros | 64 | 64 | 35 | 24 | 5 | 1845 | .906 | 173 | 2.86 | +3.5 |
| 32 |  Kevin Lankinen | 24 | 17 | 11 | 6 | 0 | 610 | .908 | 56 | 2.82 | +4.4 |
| 30 |  Yaroslav Askarov | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 35 | .943 | 2 | 1.47 | +1.8 |
Playoff games only · no league ranks, since too few clubs play for a fair comparison
| Round | Opponent | Result | Games |
|---|---|---|---|
| Round 1 | VAN | Lost 2–4 | 6 |
| Player | GP | G | A | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Filip Forsberg | 6 | 2 | 4 | 6 |
| Gustav Nyquist | 6 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Alexandre Carrier | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Roman Josi | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Jason Zucker | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Anthony Beauvillier | 6 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Goalie | GP | W-L | SV% | GAA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Juuse Saros | 6 | 2-4 | .900 | 2.02 |
2023–24 · playoffs · every finished game
| Date | Opponent | Result | SOG | SA | Shot diff | xGF% | Starting goalie |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 3 | vs VAN | L 0–1 | 28 | 29 | -1 | Juuse Saros | |
| Apr 30 | @ VAN | W 2–1 | 22 | 20 | +2 | Juuse Saros | |
| Apr 28 | vs VAN | L 3–4 OT | 30 | 21 | +9 | Juuse Saros | |
| Apr 26 | vs VAN | L 1–2 | 30 | 12 | +18 | Juuse Saros | |
| Apr 23 | @ VAN | W 4–1 | 16 | 18 | -2 | Juuse Saros | |
| Apr 21 | @ VAN | L 2–4 | 24 | 21 | +3 | Juuse Saros | |
| 6 games | 2–4 | 25.0 | 20.2 | 4.8 | |||
Summary: record, average SOG and SA per game, pooled xG share and power-play total for the filtered games.
2023–24 · regular season · every finished game
| Date | Opponent | Result | SOG | SA | Shot diff | xGF% | PP | Starting goalie |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 15 | @ PIT | L 2–4 | 30 | 38 | -8 | 0/1 | Juuse Saros | |
| Apr 13 | vs CBJ | W 6–4 | 37 | 37 | 0 | 2/3 | Juuse Saros | |
| Apr 12 | @ CHI | W 5–1 | 40 | 26 | +14 | 3/3 | Kevin Lankinen | |
| Apr 9 | vs WPG | OTL 3–4 OT | 48 | 22 | +26 | 0/4 | Juuse Saros | |
| Apr 7 | @ NJD | W 3–2 SO | 35 | 25 | +10 | 1/4 | Juuse Saros | |
| Apr 6 | @ NYI | L 0–2 | 42 | 30 | +12 | 0/3 | Kevin Lankinen | |
| Apr 4 | vs STL | W 6–3 | 31 | 47 | -16 | 2/3 | Juuse Saros | |
| Apr 2 | vs BOS | L 0–3 | 31 | 32 | -1 | 0/4 | Juuse Saros | |
| Mar 30 | @ COL | L 4–7 | 35 | 42 | -7 | 0/5 | Kevin Lankinen | |
| Mar 28 | @ ARI | L 4–8 | 37 | 40 | -3 | 2/2 | Juuse Saros | |
| 10 games | 4–5–1 | 36.6 | 33.9 | 2.7 | 10/32 | |||
Summary: record, average SOG and SA per game, pooled xG share and power-play total for the filtered games.
Loading…
Every metric name opens its definition; the full list lives in Metrics.
Every section reads one season sample per situation. Five-on-five is official five-on-five strength; power play and penalty kill include 5v3, 4v3 and 6v4, and plain 6v5 is Other. Other is all situations minus the three, so situation rows sum. Power play and penalty kill are read from this team’s side, so shots against on the power play are the opponent’s shorthanded chances.
The situation filter (all situations or five-on-five) sets Season metrics, Season vs reference, On-ice rates and the Defense suppression rows, and opens the shot map on the same choice; the shot map’s own Situation select adds power play and penalty kill. The header, the percentile radar, Results, goaltending, discipline, Special teams, Form, Roster, Game log and Seasons keep the scope their own labels state.
Team ice time is the elapsed team clock from shift charts. Per-60 rates use only games with a complete clock and appear when at least 90% of games have one. Power-play opportunities, times shorthanded, penalty minutes, hits, blocks, giveaways, takeaways and faceoffs are official team box counts from the NHL game summary; official PP% and PK% use them.
Goals above expected and GSAx exclude empty-net goals. Shot-type shooting percentage is goals divided by shots on goal. High danger everywhere on this page, ranked rows and the shot-map tier filter alike, is model scoring probability of at least 0.20 (medium at least 0.08). PDO is ranked high to low but is context, not a quality grade.
One-goal games include overtime and shootout decisions, and scoring first uses the first non-shootout goal. Shot callouts exclude shots on an empty net; attempts are unblocked, because blocked shots carry no location. Blocks and hits describe volume and time defending, so they are ranked but colored as context. Penalties count minor, major, bench and match events; misconducts and penalty shots are excluded.
Special-teams rates, shorthanded goals and net goals use the widened scopes above, which can differ from the official counts by a goal or two over a season. In Season vs reference, a change is colored by whether it helps the team, and Points % appears only in all situations. Season metrics leaves out the rows the Defense table shows and, in all situations, the rows the header shows.
An em dash means unavailable, not zero. A partial season remains partial. Percentiles and ranks need at least 20 teams.
Explore the full methodology →Unblocked attempts for and against · chance tiers are model goal probability: high ≥ 0.20, medium ≥ 0.08
246 goals on 265.8 xG (-19.8). Finishing 6.6% vs 7.1% expected per unblocked attempt.
231 goals allowed on 240.7 xG against (+9.7 saved above expected).
| Zone | Att | G | xG | Goal rate / exp. | G−xG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Inner slot | 849 | 114 | 113.7 | 13.4% / 13.4% | +0.3 |
| Right circle | 273 | 8 | 8.8 | 2.9% / 3.2% | −0.8 |
| Point | 1,081 | 22 | 23.4 | 2.0% / 2.2% | −1.4 |
| Left circle | 244 | 5 | 7.2 | 2.0% / 2.9% | −2.2 |
| Below goal line | 71 | 0 | 2.5 | 0.0% / 3.5% | −2.5 |
| Outer slot | 253 | 12 | 18.3 | 4.7% / 7.2% | −6.3 |
| High slot | 984 | 85 | 92.0 | 8.6% / 9.3% | −7.0 |
| All zones | 3,755 | 246 | 265.8 | 6.6% / 7.1% | −19.8 |
| Zone | Att | GA | xGA | Goal rate / exp. | Prevented |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| High slot | 943 | 77 | 90.7 | 8.2% / 9.6% | +13.7 |
| Left circle | 312 | 5 | 9.7 | 1.6% / 3.1% | +4.7 |
| Below goal line | 55 | 1 | 2.2 | 1.8% / 4.0% | +1.2 |
| Point | 908 | 17 | 18.0 | 1.9% / 2.0% | +1.0 |
| Right circle | 279 | 9 | 8.6 | 3.2% / 3.1% | −0.4 |
| Inner slot | 687 | 94 | 91.3 | 13.7% / 13.3% | −2.7 |
| Outer slot | 261 | 28 | 20.3 | 10.7% / 7.8% | −7.7 |
| All zones | 3,445 | 231 | 240.7 | 6.7% / 7.0% | +9.7 |
Sorted by goals against expectation. Empty-net attempts are left out, as in the evidence lines above.
| Type | Att | Share | G | xG | Sh% | G−xG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wrist | 2147 | 56.8% | 144 | 153.0 | 9.4 | -9.0 |
| Snap | 436 | 11.5% | 38 | 38.6 | 12.1 | -0.6 |
| Slap | 426 | 11.3% | 21 | 18.8 | 7.1 | +2.2 |
| Backhand | 285 | 7.5% | 22 | 23.3 | 10.2 | -1.3 |
| Tip-in | 254 | 6.7% | 23 | 20.5 | 17.7 | +2.5 |
| Deflected | 154 | 4.1% | 8 | 15.7 | 8.4 | -7.7 |
| Wrap-around | 40 | 1.1% | 3 | 1.7 | 9.4 | +1.3 |
| Poke | 20 | 0.5% | 4 | 4.6 | 22.2 | -0.6 |
| Bat | 16 | 0.4% | 3 | 1.9 | 37.5 | +1.1 |
| Between-legs | 5 | 0.1% | 0 | 0.3 | 0.0 | -0.3 |
Time in each state is all situations; shares are five-on-five · shootouts excluded
| State | Time / GP | Share of time | 5v5 xG share | 5v5 CF% | 5v5 GF–GA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leading | 23:16 | 38.5% | 47.9% | 60–58 | |
| Tied | 21:07 | 35.0% | 53.8% | 62–44 | |
| Trailing | 16:01 | 26.5% | 53.1% | 44–51 |
Leading teams usually give up share as they protect a lead, so a lower share while leading is expected.
Official record and season-level team metrics · cells shaded by league percentile that season
| Season | GP | Record | PTS | GF | GA | Diff | P% | xGF% | CF% | GAx | PDO | PP% | PK% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026–27 partial | 8 | 3–2–3 | 9 | 23 | 24 | -1 | 56.3 | 48.1 | 45.9 | 1.3 | 102.4 | 34.8 | 87.0 |
| 2025–26 | 82 | 38–34–10 | 86 | 247 | 269 | -22 | 52.4 | 47.4 | 50.4 | -9.0 | 99.6 | 23.1 | 81.7 |
| 2024–25 | 82 | 30–44–8 | 68 | 214 | 274 | -60 | 41.5 | 50.2 | 51.7 | -53.4 | 97.1 | 21.9 | 81.5 |
| 2023–24 | 82 | 47–30–5 | 99 | 269 | 248 | +21 | 60.4 | 52.1 | 52.0 | -19.8 | 100.2 | 21.6 | 76.9 |
| 2022–23 | 82 | 42–32–8 | 92 | 229 | 238 | -9 | 56.1 | 45.8 | 47.5 | -39.1 | 100.6 | 17.6 | 82.5 |
| 2021–22 | 82 | 45–30–7 | 97 | 266 | 252 | +14 | 59.1 | 48.0 | 48.5 | 13.3 | 101.3 | 24.4 | 79.2 |
| 2020–21 | 56 | 31–23–2 | 64 | 156 | 154 | +2 | 57.1 | 47.4 | 49.7 | 4.1 | 100.2 | 17.6 | 75.6 |
| 2019–20 | 69 | 35–26–8 | 78 | 215 | 217 | -2 | 56.5 | 50.0 | 51.0 | 11.1 | 99.4 | 17.3 | 76.1 |
Bold marks the best full season in each column (PDO is context, so it is neither shaded nor marked). Shading uses each season’s league percentile on the five performance tiers; the in-progress season is partial.
Five-on-five · the four lines with the most time together, from shift charts
| Line | TOI | xG share | GF–GA | CF% | Team without them |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nyquist – O'Reilly – Forsberg | 805:59 | 39–31 | 53.7% | ||
| McCarron – Sherwood – Smith | 253:43 | 20–10 | 53.8% | ||
| Jankowski – Novak – Evangelista | 179:20 | 8–4 | 62.7% | ||
| Sissons – Trenin – Smith | 136:43 | 7–10 | 43.7% |
Five-on-five · the three pairs with the most time together
| Pair | TOI | xG share | GF–GA | CF% | Team without them |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lauzon – Carrier | 726:20 | 38–34 | 50.4% | ||
| Josi – Fabbro | 600:12 | 27–29 | 51.8% | ||
| McDonagh – Josi | 438:23 | 12–13 | 55.2% |
Units are found from the skaters on the ice for the club’s five-on-five shot events; time together intersects their shifts with five-on-five play. Team without them is the club’s five-on-five xG share with that unit off the ice.
All situations · six composite axes against all 32 teams
Bands show league percentiles; axis labels show this season’s values.
Dashed outline: peer average, the average NHL team this season. Outside = above average; inside = below average. All axes point outward for stronger results.
Team value: 3.40
League range: 2.43 – 4.03 / game
Team 3.40 · mean 3.18. Higher raw values rank higher.
Expected goals for per game.
All situations · against all 32 teams
| Results | Team | Percentile | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 52.0 | 14 / 3258th |
Team value: 52.03
League range: 35.35 – 57.27 %
Team 52.03 · mean 49.99. Higher raw values rank higher.
Goals for divided by goals for plus against.
| Shot share | Team | Percentile | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 52.1 | 11 / 3268th | ||
| 52.0 | 7 / 3281st | ||
| 52.2 | 9 / 3274th | ||
| 51.3 | 14 / 3258th | ||
| 54.5 | 8 / 3277th | ||
| 52.2 | 10 / 3271st | ||
| 51.9 | 8 / 3277th |
Team value: 52.13
League range: 38.15 – 57.83 %
Team 52.13 · mean 49.98. Higher raw values rank higher.
Expected goals for divided by expected goals for plus against, raw model values.
| Chance volume | Team | Percentile | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3.40 | 9 / 3274th | ||
| 63.50 | 10 / 3271st | ||
| 2.30 | 14 / 3258th |
Team value: 3.40
League range: 2.43 – 4.03 / game
Team 3.40 · mean 3.18. Higher raw values rank higher.
Expected goals for per game.
| Finishing & goaltending | Team | Percentile | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10.1 | 16 / 3252nd | ||
| 90.1 | 12 / 3265th | ||
| 100.18 | 17 / 3248th | ||
| -19.78 | 24 / 3226th | ||
| 9.71 | 15 / 3255th |
Elite90+Strong70–89Average30–69Weak10–29Poor<10Context · not gradedBar length is the peer percentile, so longer is always better · tick at the 50th
Team value: 10.07
League range: 8.27 – 11.99 %
Team 10.07 · mean 10.16. Higher raw values rank higher.
Goals divided by shots on goal.
All situations · this season against a reference
| Metric | This season | 2022–23 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| % | 60.4 | 56.1 | +4.3 |
| / GP | 3.28 | 2.79 | +0.49 |
| / GP | 3.02 | 2.90 | +0.12 |
| / GP | 0.26 | -0.11 | +0.37 |
| / GP | 3.40 | 3.22 | +0.17 |
| / GP | 3.12 | 3.81 | -0.69 |
| % | 52.1 | 45.8 | +6.3 |
| % | 52.0 | 47.5 | +4.4 |
| % | 54.5 | 41.4 | +13.1 |
| % | 10.1 | 9.2 | +0.8 |
| % | 90.1 | 91.4 | -1.2 |
| index | 100.18 | 100.57 | -0.40 |
| goals | -19.78 | -39.14 | +19.36 |
| goals | 9.71 | 70.66 | -60.95 |
