Tampa Bay Lightning

League percentile profile

All situations · six composite axes against all 32 teams

Tampa Bay Lightning

Ranked shape withheld where sample or peer coverage is insufficient.

Bands show league percentiles; axis labels show this season’s values.

Selected metric distribution

Team value: 3.08
League range: 2.39 – 3.30 / game

Lower Higher (better)

Team 3.08 · mean 2.91. Higher raw values rank higher.

Expected goals for per game.

Season metrics

All situations · against all 32 teams

Results	Team	Percentile	Rank
	55.7		2 / 3197th

Shot share	Team	Percentile	Rank
	52.9		4 / 3190th
	51.2		9 / 3173rd
	51.0		11 / 3167th
	50.1		15 / 3153rd
	54.9		4 / 3190th
	53.5		3 / 3193rd
	52.7		5 / 3187th

Chance volume	Team	Percentile	Rank
	3.08		6 / 3183rd
	57.23		12 / 3163rd
	1.61		T-17 / 3147th

Finishing & goaltending	Team	Percentile	Rank
	11.2		1 / 3199th
	91.0		9 / 3173rd
	102.21		1 / 3199th
	25.79		5 / 3187th

Elite90+Strong70–89Average30–69Weak10–29Poor<10Context · not gradedBar length is the peer percentile, so longer is always better · tick at the 50th

Season vs reference

All situations · this season against a reference

Reference:

Metric	This season	League avg	Change
%	65.7	55.8	+9.9
/ GP	3.50	3.02	+0.48
/ GP	2.79	3.02	-0.23
/ GP	0.71	0.00	+0.71
/ GP	3.08	2.91	+0.18
/ GP	2.75	2.90	-0.15
%	52.9	50.0	+2.8
%	51.2	50.0	+1.3
%	54.9	50.0	+4.8
%	11.2	9.5	+1.7
%	91.0	90.5	+0.5
index	102.21	100.00	+2.21
goals	25.79	2.86	+22.93
goals	—	1.73	—

League percentile profile

All situations · six composite axes against all 32 teams

Tampa Bay Lightning

Ranked shape withheld where sample or peer coverage is insufficient.

Bands show league percentiles; axis labels show this season’s values.

Selected metric distribution

Team value: 3.08
League range: 2.39 – 3.30 / game

Lower Higher (better)

Team 3.08 · mean 2.91. Higher raw values rank higher.

Expected goals for per game.

Season metrics

All situations · against all 32 teams

Results	Team	Percentile	Rank
	55.7		2 / 3197th

Shot share	Team	Percentile	Rank
	52.9		4 / 3190th
	51.2		9 / 3173rd
	51.0		11 / 3167th
	50.1		15 / 3153rd
	54.9		4 / 3190th

Chance volume	Team	Percentile	Rank
	3.08		6 / 3183rd
	57.23		12 / 3163rd
	1.61		T-17 / 3147th

Finishing & goaltending	Team	Percentile	Rank
	11.2		1 / 3199th
	91.0		9 / 3173rd
	102.21		1 / 3199th
	25.79		5 / 3187th

Elite90+Strong70–89Average30–69Weak10–29Poor<10Context · not gradedBar length is the peer percentile, so longer is always better · tick at the 50th

Season vs reference

All situations · this season against a reference

Reference:

Metric	This season	League avg	Change
%	65.7	55.8	+9.9
/ GP	3.50	3.02	+0.48
/ GP	2.79	3.02	-0.23
/ GP	0.71	0.00	+0.71
/ GP	3.08	2.91	+0.18
/ GP	2.75	2.90	-0.15
%	52.9	50.0	+2.8
%	51.2	50.0	+1.3
%	54.9	50.0	+4.8
%	11.2	9.5	+1.7
%	91.0	90.5	+0.5
index	102.21	100.00	+2.21
goals	25.79	2.86	+22.93
goals	—	1.73	—

Points pace

Cumulative standings points by game against a 96-point pace over 71 games

2.00 pts · 96-point pace 1.35

Oct 3, 2019 · vs FLA

vs pace: −2.6
First half: 40
Second half: 52
Best run: W11

92 points after 70 games; the pace line expects 94.6 (-2.6).

Standings

Official standings as of Mar 11, 2020 · the playoff line is the first team out of the field (top three per division, two wild cards)

League: 4th
Eastern: 2nd
Atlantic: 2nd
Regulation wins: 35

Points behind the league leader	8
Points behind the Eastern leader	8
Points behind the Atlantic leader	8
Points above the playoff line	+11

Results vs expected

All situations · goals and expected goals per 60 of clocked team ice time · all 32 teams

Per-60 rates pending: team ice time covers under 90% of games.

By situation

Season totals; Other is all situations minus 5v5, PP and PK, so rows sum to all situations.

Situation	TOI / GP	GF	GA	xGF	xGA	xG diff	xGF%
Five-on-five	—	163	114	144.2	126.2	+18.0	53.3
Power play	—	46	15	41.6	9.4	+32.1	81.5
Penalty kill	—	11	45	10.2	37.7	-27.5	21.3
Other	—	25	21	20.0	19.2	+0.8	51.0
All situations	—	245	195	215.9	192.6	+23.3	52.9

Score state

Time in each state is all situations; shares are five-on-five · shootouts excluded

State	Time / GP	Share of time	5v5 xG share	5v5 CF%	5v5 GF–GA
Leading	25:18	41.7%	53.7%	49.3%	60–43
Tied	21:22	35.2%	51.5%	51.2%	61–45
Trailing	13:58	23.0%	54.6%	56.9%	41–26

Leading teams usually give up share as they protect a lead, so a lower share while leading is expected.

Defensive metrics

All situations · lower against rates rank higher

Suppression & events	Team	Percentile	Rank
	0.066		11 / 3167th
	2.75		9 / 3173rd
	1.33		2 / 3197th
	54.44		8 / 3177th
	12.81		23 / 3127th
	23.96		7 / 3180th
	7.36		17 / 3147th
	7.29		2 / 3197th

Context · not graded

Goaltending

All situations · goals saved above expected per goalie · empty-net goals excluded

Goalie	GP	GS	Start share	W-L-OTL	SV%	xGA	GSAx
Andrei Vasilevskiy	52	52	74.3%	35-14-3	.917	—	—
Curtis McElhinney	18	18	25.7%	8-7-3	.906	49.7	-2.3
Team		70				—	—

Team GSAx is unavailable; the goalie rows sum to it.

Discipline

Official counts · all situations

Penalties taken / GP: 4.13
Penalties drawn / GP: 3.86
Differential / GP: -0.27
PIM / GP: 10.33

Shot locations

Unblocked attempts for and against · chance tiers are model goal probability: high ≥ 0.20, medium ≥ 0.08

Situation

Chances:

View:

Shot type

Shots for 3032 attempts · 216.0 xG

Shots against 2914 attempts · 192.6 xG

Finishing evidence

230 goals on 204.2 xG (+25.8). Finishing 7.7% vs 6.9% expected per unblocked attempt.

Goaltending evidence

185 goals allowed on 184.2 xG against (-0.8 saved above expected).

High-danger for: 113
High-danger against: 93
Rebound shots: 235 – 174
Rebound xG: 20.8 – 14.5

Zones, for

Zone	Att	G	xG	Goal rate / exp.	G−xG
Inner slot	425	81	55.9	19.1% / 13.1%	+25.1
Point	1,075	29	23.6	2.7% / 2.2%	+5.4
Outer slot	126	15	10.5	11.9% / 8.4%	+4.5
Right circle	123	4	4.2	3.3% / 3.4%	−0.2
Left circle	102	3	3.4	2.9% / 3.4%	−0.4
Below goal line	15	0	0.6	0.0% / 3.8%	−0.6
High slot	1,114	98	106.1	8.8% / 9.5%	−8.1
All zones	2,980	230	204.2	7.7% / 6.9%	+25.8

Zones, against

Zone	Att	GA	xGA	Goal rate / exp.	Prevented
High slot	1,010	85	91.1	8.4% / 9.0%	+6.1
Outer slot	153	7	10.0	4.6% / 6.5%	+3.0
Right circle	132	3	3.5	2.3% / 2.7%	+0.5
Left circle	144	4	3.8	2.8% / 2.7%	−0.2
Below goal line	16	1	0.5	6.3% / 3.3%	−0.5
Inner slot	426	59	54.1	13.8% / 12.7%	−4.9
Point	1,018	26	21.0	2.6% / 2.1%	−5.0
All zones	2,899	185	184.2	6.4% / 6.4%	−0.8

Sorted by goals against expectation. Empty-net attempts are left out, as in the evidence lines above.

Shot types, for

Type	Att	Share	G	xG	Sh%	G−xG
Wrist	1661	54.8%	133	122.9	10.6	+10.1
Slap	540	17.8%	24	25.7	6.7	-1.7
Snap	307	10.1%	34	24.2	15.6	+9.8
Tip-in	272	9.0%	26	20.8	16.6	+5.2
Backhand	198	6.5%	17	17.6	10.8	-0.6
Deflected	42	1.4%	9	4.0	33.3	+5.0
Wrap-around	12	0.4%	0	0.7	0.0	-0.7

Shot density

Loading…

Power play

Official percentage · rates use our scope, including 5v3, 4v3 and 6v4

PP%: 23.1%
Opportunities / GP: 3.03
Net PP goals: 31

Power play rates	Team	Percentile	Rank
	4.44		13 / 3160th

Per-60 rates pending: team ice time covers under 90% of games.

Penalty kill

Official percentage · rates use our scope, including 5v3, 4v3 and 6v4

PK%: 81.4%
Times shorthanded / GP: 3.30
Net PK goals: -34

Penalty kill rates	Team	Percentile	Rank
	7.28		24 / 3123rd

Per-60 rates pending: team ice time covers under 90% of games.

Record splits

W–L–OTL, points % and goals per game · rest counts days off before the game; the playoff field is the standings' top three per division plus two wild cards

Split	GP	W–L–OTL	PTS	P%	GF/GP	GA/GP
Venue
Home	34	22–10–2	46	67.6%	3.88	2.74
Away	36	21–11–4	46	63.9%	3.14	2.83
Opponent
vs Eastern	43	28–12–3	59	68.6%	3.37	2.70
vs Western	27	15–9–3	33	61.1%	3.70	2.93
vs own division	24	18–5–1	37	77.1%	3.75	2.50
vs playoff teams	34	17–12–5	39	57.4%	3.00	2.91
vs non-playoff teams	36	26–9–1	53	73.6%	3.97	2.67
Game state
One-goal games	33	18–9–6	42	63.6%	2.97	2.88
Scoring first	41	30–9–2	62	75.6%	3.66	2.34
Allowing first	29	13–12–4	30	51.7%	3.28	3.41
Recent
Last 10	10	3–6–1	7	35.0%	3.00	3.60
Rest
Back-to-back	12	8–2–2	18	75.0%	3.42	2.42
1 day of rest	41	25–14–2	52	63.4%	3.54	2.88
2+ days of rest	16	9–5–2	20	62.5%	3.38	2.88

By period

Goals for and against · a shootout decider counts as an overtime goal

1st period6946

2nd period8970

3rd period7973

Overtime86

For Against

Forward lines

Five-on-five · the four lines with the most time together, from shift charts

Line	TOI	xG share	GF–GA	CF%	Team without them
Palat – Kucherov – Point	359:16	63.9%	18–14	59.0%	51.7%
Stamkos – Kucherov – Point	297:53	62.3%	12–8	54.8%	52.1%
Maroon – Gourde – Paquette	247:22	56.2%	15–7	54.6%	52.8%
Killorn – Stamkos – Cirelli	158:11	50.3%	7–6	52.4%	53.2%

Defense pairs

Five-on-five · the three pairs with the most time together

Pair	TOI	xG share	GF–GA	CF%	Team without them
Shattenkirk – Sergachev	596:23	56.5%	36–19	54.3%	52.3%
McDonagh – Cernak	540:49	49.6%	33–25	48.5%	53.8%
Hedman – Rutta	315:12	55.3%	16–10	53.2%	52.8%

Units are found from the skaters on the ice for the club’s five-on-five shot events; time together intersects their shifts with five-on-five play. Team without them is the club’s five-on-five xG share with that unit off the ice.

Loading…

Leaders

This club’s games only · season totals and average ice time

Points: 85
Goals: 33
Assists: 52
Ice time: 24:04
GSAx: −2.3

Skaters

This club’s games only · P/60 and 5v5 xG share use this stint; grade is the full season

Position:

			Games	Scoring			Discipline		Shots		Time	Model
#	Player	Pos	GP	G	A	P	+/−	PIM	SOG	S%	ATOI	P/60	5v5 xG%	Grade
86	Nikita Kucherov	R	68	33	52	85	+26	38	210	15.7%	18:52	3.98	57.4	—
91	Steven Stamkos	C	57	29	37	66	+14	22	176	16.5%	18:25	3.77	52.9	—
21	Brayden Point	C	66	25	39	64	+28	11	141	17.7%	18:54	3.08	57.5	—
77	Victor Hedman	D	66	11	44	55	+27	31	155	7.1%	24:04	2.08	55.5	—
17	Alex Killorn	L	68	26	23	49	+19	20	130	20.0%	17:56	2.41	49.5	—
71	Anthony Cirelli	C	68	16	28	44	+28	30	113	14.2%	18:27	2.10	54.7	—
18	Ondrej Palat	L	69	17	24	41	+25	22	128	13.3%	16:11	2.20	56.8	—
22	Kevin Shattenkirk	D	70	8	26	34	+22	38	131	6.1%	18:54	1.54	54.8	—
98	Mikhail Sergachev	D	70	10	24	34	+15	58	118	8.5%	20:22	1.43	54.8	—
9	Tyler Johnson	C	65	14	17	31	+9	16	113	12.4%	14:33	1.97	53.3	—
37	Yanni Gourde	C	70	10	20	30	-5	49	110	9.1%	14:04	1.83	52.7	—
14	Patrick Maroon	L	64	9	14	23	+4	71	80	11.3%	12:25	1.74	52.4	—
13	Cedric Paquette	C	61	7	11	18	-1	42	78	9.0%	13:03	1.36	48.3	—
23	Carter Verhaeghe	C	52	9	4	13	-9	8	57	15.8%	9:22	1.60	55.0	—
27	Ryan McDonagh	D	50	1	11	12	+7	19	50	2.0%	20:42	0.70	51.2	—
81	Erik Cernak	D	67	5	7	12	+11	59	125	4.0%	18:57	0.57	51.1	—
7	Mathieu Joseph	R	37	4	3	7	-2	16	35	11.4%	11:31	0.99	52.5	—
44	Jan Rutta	D	33	1	6	7	+6	14	43	2.3%	15:33	0.82	54.9	—
67	Mitchell Stephens	C	38	3	3	6	-9	10	43	7.0%	10:47	0.88	54.2	—
55	Braydon Coburn	D	40	1	3	4	+5	16	44	2.3%	14:03	0.43	48.7	—
2	Luke Schenn	D	25	1	2	3	-8	23	31	3.2%	12:27	0.58	47.3	—

Goalies

GSAx: goals saved above expected, all situations, empty-net goals excluded.

	Games	Record	Shots faced	Goals allowed	Model
88	Andrei Vasilevskiy	52	52	35	14	3	1605	.917	133	2.56	–
35	Curtis McElhinney	18	18	8	7	3	551	.906	52	2.89	-2.3

2019–20 playoffs

Playoff games only · no league ranks, since too few clubs play for a fair comparison

Record: 18-7
Series won: 4
Goals: 78–57
xG share: 53.3%
Shots: 879–742

Series

Round	Opponent	Result	Games
Qualifying round	WSH	Won 1–0	1
Qualifying round	BOS	Won 1–0	1
Qualifying round	PHI	Won 0–1	1
Round 1	CBJ	Won 4–1	5
Round 2	BOS	Won 4–1	5
Round 3	NYI	Won 4–2	6
Stanley Cup Final	DAL	Won 4–2	6

Leading scorers

Player	GP	G	A	P
Nikita Kucherov	25	7	27	34
Brayden Point	23	14	19	33
Victor Hedman	25	10	12	22
Ondrej Palat	25	11	7	18
Yanni Gourde	25	7	7	14
Blake Coleman	25	5	8	13

Goaltending

Goalie	GP	W-L	SV%	GAA
Andrei Vasilevskiy	25	18-7	.927	1.90

Playoff games

2019–20 · playoffs · every finished game

Games:

Venue:

Date	Opponent	Result	SOG	SA	Shot diff	xGF%	Starting goalie
Sep 28	@ DAL	W 2–0	29	22	+7	41.2%	Andrei Vasilevskiy
Sep 26	vs DAL	L 2–3 OT	41	33	+8	40.4%	Andrei Vasilevskiy
Sep 25	@ DAL	W 5–4 OT	35	30	+5	52.9%	Andrei Vasilevskiy
Sep 23	@ DAL	W 5–2	32	24	+8	53.6%	Andrei Vasilevskiy
Sep 21	vs DAL	W 3–2	31	29	+2	51.8%	Andrei Vasilevskiy
Sep 19	vs DAL	L 1–4	36	20	+16	47.1%	Andrei Vasilevskiy
Sep 17	@ NYI	W 2–1 OT	48	27	+21	58.2%	Andrei Vasilevskiy
Sep 15	vs NYI	L 1–2 OT	37	24	+13	62.8%	Andrei Vasilevskiy
Sep 13	@ NYI	W 4–1	36	27	+9	57.9%	Andrei Vasilevskiy
Sep 11	@ NYI	L 3–5	37	35	+2	45.4%	Andrei Vasilevskiy
Sep 9	vs NYI	W 2–1	21	28	-7	45.5%	Andrei Vasilevskiy
Sep 7	vs NYI	W 8–2	34	24	+10	53.6%	Andrei Vasilevskiy
Aug 31	vs BOS	W 3–2 OT	35	47	-12	51.0%	Andrei Vasilevskiy
Aug 29	@ BOS	W 3–1	26	30	-4	44.6%	Andrei Vasilevskiy
Aug 26	@ BOS	W 7–1	31	24	+7	57.3%	Andrei Vasilevskiy
Aug 25	vs BOS	W 4–3 OT	40	25	+15	65.6%	Andrei Vasilevskiy
Aug 23	vs BOS	L 2–3	37	31	+6	54.2%	Andrei Vasilevskiy
Aug 19	vs CBJ	W 5–4 OT	25	41	-16	39.0%	Andrei Vasilevskiy
Aug 17	@ CBJ	W 2–1	22	29	-7	52.0%	Andrei Vasilevskiy
Aug 15	@ CBJ	W 3–2	34	17	+17	60.5%	Andrei Vasilevskiy
Aug 13	vs CBJ	L 1–3	37	22	+15	62.4%	Andrei Vasilevskiy
Aug 11	vs CBJ	W 3–2 OT	88	63	+25	68.8%	Andrei Vasilevskiy
Aug 8	vs PHI	L 1–4	24	30	-6	52.4%	Andrei Vasilevskiy
Aug 5	@ BOS	W 3–2	35	27	+8	59.2%	Andrei Vasilevskiy
Aug 3	vs WSH	W 3–2 SO	28	33	-5	41.3%	Andrei Vasilevskiy
25 games		18–7	35.2	29.7	5.5	53.3%

Summary: record, average SOG and SA per game, pooled xG share and power-play total for the filtered games.

Every playoff run

The club's recorded playoff runs, newest first · a playoff overtime loss is a loss

Season	GP
2025–26	7
2024–25	5
2023–24	5
2022–23	6
2021–22	23
2020–21	22
2019–20	25
2018–19	4

2019–20 · regular season · every finished game

Games:

Venue:

Date	Opponent	Result	SOG	SA	Shot diff	xGF%	PP	Starting goalie
Mar 10	@ TOR	L 1–2	33	36	-3	43.0%	0/4	Andrei Vasilevskiy
Mar 8	@ DET	OTL 4–5 SO	37	28	+9	51.1%	1/3	Curtis McElhinney
Mar 7	@ BOS	W 5–3	25	38	-13	38.6%	1/3	Andrei Vasilevskiy
Mar 5	vs MTL	W 4–0	23	32	-9	47.4%	1/3	Andrei Vasilevskiy
Mar 3	vs BOS	L 1–2	21	35	-14	35.0%	0/1	Andrei Vasilevskiy
Feb 29	vs CGY	W 4–3	33	21	+12	72.6%	2/4	Andrei Vasilevskiy
Feb 27	vs CHI	L 2–5	38	27	+11	52.7%	0/5	Curtis McElhinney
Feb 25	vs TOR	L 3–4	29	23	+6	58.9%	0/3	Andrei Vasilevskiy
Feb 22	@ ARI	L 3–7	30	41	-11	53.5%	0/1	Andrei Vasilevskiy
Feb 20	@ VGK	L 3–5	27	33	-6	38.4%	2/4	Andrei Vasilevskiy
10 games		3–6–1	29.6	31.4	-1.8	49.2%	7/31

Summary: record, average SOG and SA per game, pooled xG share and power-play total for the filtered games.

Official record and season-level team metrics · cells shaded by league percentile that season

Season	GP	Record	PTS	GF	GA	Diff	P%	xGF%	CF%	GAx	PDO	PP%	PK%
2026–27 partial	9	7–2–0	14	31	23	+8	77.8	—	—	—	—	16.7	81.8
2025–26	82	50–26–6	106	290	231	+59	64.6	55.4	52.7	-7.7	101.9	20.7	82.6
2024–25	82	47–27–8	102	294	219	+75	62.2	54.6	51.1	-7.3	103.1	25.9	81.6
2023–24	82	45–29–8	98	291	268	+23	59.8	53.5	50.9	-5.6	101.0	28.6	83.3
2022–23	82	46–30–6	98	283	254	+29	59.8	53.9	51.3	-54.7	100.9	25.4	79.7
2021–22	82	51–23–8	110	287	233	+54	67.1	54.5	50.8	-20.0	101.9	23.9	80.6
2020–21	56	36–17–3	75	181	147	+34	67.0	54.3	52.0	2.3	101.5	22.2	84.2
2019–20	70	43–21–6	92	245	195	+50	65.7	52.9	51.2	25.8	102.2	23.1	81.4

Bold marks the best full season in each column (PDO is context, so it is neither shaded nor marked). Shading uses each season’s league percentile on the five performance tiers; the in-progress season is partial.

Loading…

Every metric name opens its definition; the full list lives in Metrics.

Every section reads one season sample per situation. Five-on-five is official five-on-five strength; power play and penalty kill include 5v3, 4v3 and 6v4, and plain 6v5 is Other. Other is all situations minus the three, so situation rows sum. Power play and penalty kill are read from this team’s side, so shots against on the power play are the opponent’s shorthanded chances.

The situation filter (all situations or five-on-five) sets Season metrics, Season vs reference, On-ice rates and the Defense suppression rows, and opens the shot map on the same choice; the shot map’s own Situation select adds power play and penalty kill. The header, the percentile radar, Results, goaltending, discipline, Special teams, Form, Roster, Game log and Seasons keep the scope their own labels state.

Team ice time is the elapsed team clock from shift charts. Per-60 rates use only games with a complete clock and appear when at least 90% of games have one. Power-play opportunities, times shorthanded, penalty minutes, hits, blocks, giveaways, takeaways and faceoffs are official team box counts from the NHL game summary; official PP% and PK% use them.

Goals above expected and GSAx exclude empty-net goals. Shot-type shooting percentage is goals divided by shots on goal. High danger everywhere on this page, ranked rows and the shot-map tier filter alike, is model scoring probability of at least 0.20 (medium at least 0.08). PDO is ranked high to low but is context, not a quality grade.

One-goal games include overtime and shootout decisions, and scoring first uses the first non-shootout goal. Shot callouts exclude shots on an empty net; attempts are unblocked, because blocked shots carry no location. Blocks and hits describe volume and time defending, so they are ranked but colored as context. Penalties count minor, major, bench and match events; misconducts and penalty shots are excluded.

Special-teams rates, shorthanded goals and net goals use the widened scopes above, which can differ from the official counts by a goal or two over a season. In Season vs reference, a change is colored by whether it helps the team, and Points % appears only in all situations. Season metrics leaves out the rows the Defense table shows and, in all situations, the rows the header shows.

An em dash means unavailable, not zero. A partial season remains partial. Percentiles and ranks need at least 20 teams.

Explore the full methodology →

Season performanceAll situations · league percentiles, reference and ranked metricsCollapse

League percentile profile

Season metrics

Season vs reference

League percentile profile

Season metrics

Season vs reference

Results & record43–21–6 record · 92 points in 70 gamesExplore

Points pace

Standings

On-ice resultsAll situations · rates vs expected, with every situation and period beside themExplore

Results vs expected

By situation

Score state

Defense & goaltendingStrong 2.75 expected goals against per game in all situations (9th of 31)Explore

Defensive metrics

Goaltending

Discipline

Shooting & finishingStrong +25.8 goals above expected in all situations (5th of 31)Explore

Shot locations

Finishing evidence

Goaltending evidence

Zones, for

Zones, against

Shot types, for

Shot density

Special teamsPP · PKPower play: 23.1% (5th) · Penalty kill: 81.4% (14th)Explore

Power play

Penalty kill

FormCooling 49.2% xG share over the last 10 games vs 52.9% this season, 3–6–1Explore

Recent form

SplitsHome 22–10–2 · Away 21–11–4Explore

Record splits

By period

Lines & pairs5v5The most-used five-on-five forward lines and defense pairsExplore

Forward lines

Defense pairs

Roster31 active skatersExplore

Leaders

Skaters

Goalies

PlayoffsWon the Stanley Cup · 18-7 in 25 gamesExplore

2019–20 playoffs

Series

Leading scorers

Goaltending

Playoff games

Every playoff run

Game log70 GP · Last game: L 1–2 at TORExplore

Seasons8 NHL seasons trackedExplore

Data notesScopes, sources and missing valuesExplore

League percentile profile

Season metrics

Season vs reference

Score state

Forward lines

Defense pairs

Shot locations

Finishing evidence

Goaltending evidence

Zones, for

Zones, against

Shot types, for