Tampa Bay Lightning

League percentile profile

All situations · six composite axes against all 32 teams

Tampa Bay Lightning

Ranked shape withheld where sample or peer coverage is insufficient.

Bands show league percentiles; axis labels show this season’s values.

Selected metric distribution

Team value: 3.61
League range: 2.69 – 3.71 / game

Lower Higher (better)

Team 3.61 · mean 3.13. Higher raw values rank higher.

Expected goals for per game.

Season metrics

All situations · against all 32 teams

Results	Team	Percentile	Rank
	55.7		2 / 3297th

Shot share	Team	Percentile	Rank
	55.4		3 / 3294th
	52.7		4 / 3290th
	52.0		6 / 3284th
	51.3		9 / 3274th
	61.0		2 / 3297th
	55.1		4 / 3290th
	53.6		3 / 3294th

Chance volume	Team	Percentile	Rank
	3.61		2 / 3297th
	59.62		11 / 3268th
	3.61		1 / 3299th

Finishing & goaltending	Team	Percentile	Rank
	12.4		3 / 3294th
	89.5		9 / 3274th
	101.95		4 / 3290th
	-7.72		19 / 3242nd

Elite90+Strong70–89Average30–69Weak10–29Poor<10Context · not gradedBar length is the peer percentile, so longer is always better · tick at the 50th

Season vs reference

All situations · this season against a reference

Reference:

Metric	This season	2024–25	Change
%	64.6	62.2	+2.4
/ GP	3.54	3.59	-0.05
/ GP	2.82	2.67	+0.15
/ GP	0.72	0.91	-0.20
/ GP	3.61	3.57	+0.04
/ GP	2.91	2.97	-0.06
%	55.4	54.6	+0.8
%	52.7	51.1	+1.6
%	61.0	61.8	-0.7
%	12.4	12.5	-0.1
%	89.5	90.7	-1.1
index	101.95	103.12	-1.17
goals	-7.72	-7.27	-0.45
goals	—	—	—

League percentile profile

All situations · six composite axes against all 32 teams

Tampa Bay Lightning

Ranked shape withheld where sample or peer coverage is insufficient.

Bands show league percentiles; axis labels show this season’s values.

Selected metric distribution

Team value: 3.61
League range: 2.69 – 3.71 / game

Lower Higher (better)

Team 3.61 · mean 3.13. Higher raw values rank higher.

Expected goals for per game.

Season metrics

All situations · against all 32 teams

Results	Team	Percentile	Rank
	55.7		2 / 3297th

Shot share	Team	Percentile	Rank
	55.4		3 / 3294th
	52.7		4 / 3290th
	52.0		6 / 3284th
	51.3		9 / 3274th
	61.0		2 / 3297th

Chance volume	Team	Percentile	Rank
	3.61		2 / 3297th
	59.62		11 / 3268th
	3.61		1 / 3299th

Finishing & goaltending	Team	Percentile	Rank
	12.4		3 / 3294th
	89.5		9 / 3274th
	101.95		4 / 3290th
	-7.72		19 / 3242nd

Elite90+Strong70–89Average30–69Weak10–29Poor<10Context · not gradedBar length is the peer percentile, so longer is always better · tick at the 50th

Season vs reference

All situations · this season against a reference

Reference:

Metric	This season	2024–25	Change
%	64.6	62.2	+2.4
/ GP	3.54	3.59	-0.05
/ GP	2.82	2.67	+0.15
/ GP	0.72	0.91	-0.20
/ GP	3.61	3.57	+0.04
/ GP	2.91	2.97	-0.06
%	55.4	54.6	+0.8
%	52.7	51.1	+1.6
%	61.0	61.8	-0.7
%	12.4	12.5	-0.1
%	89.5	90.7	-1.1
index	101.95	103.12	-1.17
goals	-7.72	-7.27	-0.45
goals	—	—	—

Points pace

Cumulative standings points by game against a 96-point pace over 82 games

0.00 pts · 96-point pace 1.17

Oct 9, 2025 · vs OTT

vs pace: +10.0
First half: 53
Second half: 53
Best run: W11

106 points after 82 games; the pace line expects 96.0 (+10.0).

Standings

Official standings as of Apr 16, 2026 · the playoff line is the first team out of the field (top three per division, two wild cards)

League: 5th
Eastern: 3rd
Atlantic: 2nd
Regulation wins: 40

Points behind the league leader	15
Points behind the Eastern leader	7
Points behind the Atlantic leader	3
Points above the playoff line	+11

Results vs expected

All situations · goals and expected goals per 60 of clocked team ice time · all 32 teams

Per 60	Team	Percentile	Rank
	3.45		4 / 3290th
	3.58		2 / 3297th
	2.76		3 / 3294th
	2.88		8 / 3277th

By situation

Season totals; Other is all situations minus 5v5, PP and PK, so rows sum to all situations.

Situation	TOI / GP	GF	GA	xGF	xGA	xG diff	xGF%
Five-on-five	47:41	195	152	181.3	148.0	+33.3	55.1
Power play	5:00	50	6	64.1	6.5	+57.7	90.8
Penalty kill	5:10	6	45	7.6	56.5	-49.0	11.8
Other	2:47	39	28	43.4	27.2	+16.1	61.4
All situations	60:37	290	231	296.3	238.2	+58.1	55.4

Score state

Time in each state is all situations; shares are five-on-five · shootouts excluded

State	Time / GP	Share of time	5v5 xG share	5v5 CF%	5v5 GF–GA
Leading	21:30	35.5%	53.0%	48.3%	73–51
Tied	21:11	34.9%	56.2%	54.6%	56–61
Trailing	17:56	29.6%	56.0%	57.4%	66–40

Leading teams usually give up share as they protect a lead, so a lower share while leading is expected.

Defensive metrics

All situations · lower against rates rank higher

Suppression & events	Team	Percentile	Rank
	0.072		11 / 3268th
	2.91		7 / 3281st
	2.30		T-18 / 3245th
	53.50		3 / 3294th
	12.27		29 / 3210th
	20.02		17 / 3248th
	4.10		31 / 323rd
	15.00		10 / 3271st

Context · not graded

Goaltending

All situations · goals saved above expected per goalie · empty-net goals excluded

Goalie	GP	GS	Start share	W-L-OTL	SV%	xGA	GSAx
Andrei Vasilevskiy	58	58	70.7%	39-15-4	.912	—	—
Jonas Johansson	25	23	28.0%	11-10-2	.884	—	—
Brandon Halverson	2	1	1.2%	0-1-0	.810	2.3	-1.7
Team		82				—	—

Team GSAx is unavailable; the goalie rows sum to it.

Discipline

Official counts · all situations

Penalties taken / GP: 4.87
Penalties drawn / GP: 4.78
Differential / GP: -0.09
PIM / GP: 14.72

Shot locations

Unblocked attempts for and against · chance tiers are model goal probability: high ≥ 0.20, medium ≥ 0.08

Situation

Chances:

View:

Shot type

Shots for 3571 attempts · 296.3 xG

Shots against 3290 attempts · 238.2 xG

Finishing evidence

263 goals on 270.7 xG (-7.7). Finishing 7.5% vs 7.7% expected per unblocked attempt.

Goaltending evidence

214 goals allowed on 226.2 xG against (+12.2 saved above expected).

High-danger for: 296
High-danger against: 189
Rebound shots: 412 – 347
Rebound xG: 34.1 – 26.8

Zones, for

Zone	Att	G	xG	Goal rate / exp.	G−xG
Inner slot	803	115	105.3	14.3% / 13.1%	+9.7
Right circle	233	10	8.6	4.3% / 3.7%	+1.4
Left circle	202	6	5.9	3.0% / 2.9%	+0.1
Point	1,035	22	22.9	2.1% / 2.2%	−0.9
Below goal line	40	0	2.1	0.0% / 5.2%	−2.1
Outer slot	233	20	23.9	8.6% / 10.2%	−3.9
High slot	982	90	102.1	9.2% / 10.4%	−12.1
All zones	3,528	263	270.7	7.5% / 7.7%	−7.7

Zones, against

Zone	Att	GA	xGA	Goal rate / exp.	Prevented
Inner slot	685	79	86.3	11.5% / 12.6%	+7.3
High slot	921	83	87.8	9.0% / 9.5%	+4.8
Left circle	238	5	7.3	2.1% / 3.1%	+2.3
Point	947	18	19.2	1.9% / 2.0%	+1.2
Right circle	220	7	7.5	3.2% / 3.4%	+0.5
Below goal line	45	1	1.3	2.2% / 2.9%	+0.3
Outer slot	204	21	16.8	10.3% / 8.2%	−4.2
All zones	3,260	214	226.2	6.6% / 6.9%	+12.2

Sorted by goals against expectation. Empty-net attempts are left out, as in the evidence lines above.

Shot types, for

Type	Att	Share	G	xG	Sh%	G−xG
Wrist	1253	35.1%	101	102.1	12.1	-1.1
Snap	1016	28.5%	81	95.2	11.6	-14.2
Slap	582	16.3%	35	31.9	10.1	+3.1
Tip-in	358	10.0%	26	33.0	14.2	-7.0
Backhand	253	7.1%	30	22.6	18.8	+7.4
Deflected	55	1.5%	7	6.8	15.6	+0.2
Bat	22	0.6%	0	1.8	0.0	-1.8
Wrap-around	16	0.4%	2	1.0	18.2	+1.0
Poke	14	0.4%	2	1.6	18.2	+0.4
Unrecorded	2	0.1%	2	0.4	100.0	+1.6

Shot density

Loading…

Power play

Official percentage · rates use our scope, including 5v3, 4v3 and 6v4

PP%: 20.7%
Opportunities / GP: 3.00
Net PP goals: 44

Power play rates	Team	Percentile	Rank
	9.40		6 / 3083rd
	7.33		16 / 3048th
	99.53		21 / 3031st
	-14.14		28 / 307th

Penalty kill

Official percentage · rates use our scope, including 5v3, 4v3 and 6v4

PK%: 82.6%
Times shorthanded / GP: 3.15
Net PK goals: -39

Penalty kill rates	Team	Percentile	Rank
	8.01		9 / 3072nd
	6.38		2 / 3097th
	94.07		7 / 3079th
	-11.53		7 / 3079th

Record splits

W–L–OTL, points % and goals per game · rest counts days off before the game; the playoff field is the standings' top three per division plus two wild cards

Split	GP	W–L–OTL	PTS	P%	GF/GP	GA/GP
Venue
Home	41	26–14–1	53	64.6%	3.34	2.80
Away	41	24–12–5	53	64.6%	3.73	2.83
Opponent
vs Western	32	23–6–3	49	76.6%	3.53	2.34
vs Eastern	50	27–20–3	57	57.0%	3.54	3.12
vs own division	26	16–9–1	33	63.5%	3.54	3.04
vs playoff teams	40	27–13–0	54	67.5%	3.63	2.85
vs non-playoff teams	42	23–13–6	52	61.9%	3.45	2.79
Game state
One-goal games	31	15–10–6	36	58.1%	2.87	2.90
Scoring first	38	31–5–2	64	84.2%	4.16	2.29
Allowing first	44	19–21–4	42	47.7%	3.00	3.27
Recent
Last 10	10	5–5–0	10	50.0%	2.60	3.00
Rest
Back-to-back	15	7–6–2	16	53.3%	3.60	3.73
1 day of rest	48	32–14–2	66	68.8%	3.60	2.56
2+ days of rest	18	11–5–2	24	66.7%	3.28	2.61

By period

Goals for and against · a shootout decider counts as an overtime goal

1st period7976

2nd period10069

3rd period10180

Overtime106

For Against

Forward lines

Five-on-five · the four lines with the most time together, from shift charts

Line	TOI	xG share	GF–GA	CF%	Team without them
Gourde – Girgensons – Holmberg	609:37	53.7%	18–20	54.5%	55.3%
Kucherov – Cirelli – Hagel	344:31	64.0%	28–8	62.2%	53.8%
Kucherov – Guentzel – Point	264:00	54.8%	16–10	54.0%	55.1%
Kucherov – Point – Goncalves	130:22	66.6%	18–4	54.5%	54.6%

Defense pairs

Five-on-five · the three pairs with the most time together

Pair	TOI	xG share	GF–GA	CF%	Team without them
Raddysh – Moser	885:00	59.5%	46–30	59.7%	53.7%
McDonagh – Cernak	474:00	52.1%	18–19	48.5%	55.4%
D'Astous – Lilleberg	447:33	55.7%	25–17	51.2%	55.0%

Units are found from the skaters on the ice for the club’s five-on-five shot events; time together intersects their shifts with five-on-five play. Team without them is the club’s five-on-five xG share with that unit off the ice.

Loading…

Leaders

This club’s games only · season totals and average ice time

Points: 130
Goals: 44
Assists: 86
Ice time: 22:42
GSAx: −1.7

Skaters

This club’s games only · P/60 and 5v5 xG share use this stint; grade is the full season

Position:

			Games	Scoring			Discipline		Shots		Time	Model
#	Player	Pos	GP	G	A	P	+/−	PIM	SOG	S%	ATOI	P/60	5v5 xG%	Grade
86	Nikita Kucherov	R	76	44	86	130	+43	50	231	19.0%	20:20	5.05	59.1	A+
59	Jake Guentzel	C	81	38	50	88	+13	61	220	17.3%	20:15	3.22	56.0	A+
38	Brandon Hagel	L	71	36	38	74	+34	58	214	16.8%	19:46	3.16	61.3	A+
43	Darren Raddysh	D	73	22	48	70	+21	72	212	10.4%	22:42	2.54	58.7	A+
71	Anthony Cirelli	C	71	23	29	52	+38	48	125	18.4%	17:19	2.54	58.8	B+
21	Brayden Point	C	63	18	32	50	+12	14	129	14.0%	18:15	2.61	56.5	A+
93	Gage Goncalves	C	74	11	22	33	+26	41	77	14.3%	13:05	2.04	57.4	C−
22	Oliver Bjorkstrand	R	80	12	20	32	-14	16	130	9.2%	13:38	1.76	49.8	A−
51	Charle-Edouard D'Astous	D	70	6	23	29	-4	112	80	7.5%	18:45	1.33	56.6	B−
90	J.J. Moser	D	79	7	22	29	+41	69	111	6.3%	21:34	1.02	56.8	A−
37	Yanni Gourde	C	82	9	19	28	-6	66	114	7.9%	16:22	1.25	50.7	F
29	Pontus Holmberg	R	70	11	11	22	+1	31	90	12.2%	13:21	1.41	53.7	C
27	Ryan McDonagh	D	48	6	15	21	+14	6	39	15.4%	19:15	1.36	53.9	C+
28	Zemgus Girgensons	C	74	9	11	20	+1	31	89	10.1%	14:46	1.10	47.4	F
77	Victor Hedman	D	33	1	16	17	-1	10	50	2.0%	18:52	1.64	49.2	A+
20	Nick Paul	L	51	7	8	15	-15	32	68	10.3%	13:41	1.29	50.0	C−
17	Dominic James	C	43	7	8	15	+4	8	56	12.5%	12:14	1.71	55.1	D
78	Emil Lilleberg	D	50	4	8	12	+15	61	43	9.3%	17:18	0.83	54.7	B
81	Erik Cernak	D	61	3	8	11	+3	74	53	5.7%	17:37	0.61	51.6	F
24	Max Crozier	D	35	1	9	10	+7	40	46	2.2%	16:01	1.07	55.4	—
10	Corey Perry	R	22	6	3	9	+1	22	26	23.1%	12:13	2.01	47.4	A+
46	Scott Sabourin	R	26	1	4	5	+1	89	11	9.1%	7:57	1.45	47.7	—
62	Jack Finley	C	22	2	1	3	+2	21	11	18.2%	8:25	0.97	53.8	—
67	Declan Carlile	D	42	1	2	3	+5	40	33	3.0%	14:47	0.29	50.0	F
42	Curtis Douglas	C	29	0	2	2	+1	92	17	0.0%	5:58	0.69	54.9	—

Goalies

GSAx: goals saved above expected, all situations, empty-net goals excluded.

	Games	Record	Shots faced	Goals allowed	Model
88	Andrei Vasilevskiy	58	58	39	15	4	1483	.912	132	2.31	–
31	Jonas Johansson	25	23	11	10	2	670	.884	78	3.29	–
33	Brandon Halverson	2	1	0	1	0	21	.810	4	4.22	-1.7

2025–26 playoffs

Playoff games only · no league ranks, since too few clubs play for a fair comparison

Record: 3-4
Series won: 0
Goals: 15–16
xG share: 56.8%
Shots: 196–156

Series

Round	Opponent	Result	Games
Round 1	MTL	Lost 3–4	7

Leading scorers

Player	GP	G	A	P
Brandon Hagel	7	6	2	8
Jake Guentzel	7	2	6	8
Nikita Kucherov	7	1	5	6
Dominic James	7	2	1	3
Gage Goncalves	7	1	2	3
J.J. Moser	7	1	2	3

Goaltending

Goalie	GP	W-L	SV%	GAA
Andrei Vasilevskiy	7	3-4	.897	2.18

Playoff games

2025–26 · playoffs · every finished game

Games:

Venue:

Date	Opponent	Result	SOG	SA	Shot diff	xGF%	Starting goalie
May 3	vs MTL	L 1–2	29	9	+20	77.6%	Andrei Vasilevskiy
May 1	@ MTL	W 1–0 OT	33	30	+3	60.9%	Andrei Vasilevskiy
Apr 29	vs MTL	L 2–3	40	24	+16	56.9%	Andrei Vasilevskiy
Apr 26	@ MTL	W 3–2	20	18	+2	57.9%	Andrei Vasilevskiy
Apr 24	@ MTL	L 2–3 OT	17	29	-12	46.8%	Andrei Vasilevskiy
Apr 21	vs MTL	W 3–2 OT	34	27	+7	50.0%	Andrei Vasilevskiy
Apr 19	vs MTL	L 3–4 OT	23	19	+4	49.7%	Andrei Vasilevskiy
7 games		3–4	28.0	22.3	5.7	56.8%

Summary: record, average SOG and SA per game, pooled xG share and power-play total for the filtered games.

Every playoff run

The club's recorded playoff runs, newest first · a playoff overtime loss is a loss

Season	GP
2025–26	7
2024–25	5
2023–24	5
2022–23	6
2021–22	23
2020–21	22
2019–20	25
2018–19	4

2025–26 · regular season · every finished game

Games:

Venue:

Date	Opponent	Result	SOG	SA	Shot diff	xGF%	PP	Starting goalie
Apr 15	vs NYR	L 2–4	31	21	+10	57.9%	0/3	Brandon Halverson
Apr 13	vs DET	W 4–3 OT	22	30	-8	49.6%	0/1	Andrei Vasilevskiy
Apr 11	@ BOS	W 2–1	24	21	+3	54.5%	0/1	Andrei Vasilevskiy
Apr 9	@ MTL	L 1–2	18	21	-3	35.0%	0/4	Andrei Vasilevskiy
Apr 7	@ OTT	L 2–6	30	32	-2	35.0%	0/2	Jonas Johansson
Apr 6	@ BUF	L 2–4	25	30	-5	43.9%	1/5	Andrei Vasilevskiy
Apr 4	vs BOS	W 3–1	23	22	+1	55.2%	0/1	Andrei Vasilevskiy
Apr 2	vs PIT	W 6–3	33	24	+9	71.0%	0/3	Andrei Vasilevskiy
Mar 31	vs MTL	L 1–4	37	23	+14	49.9%	0/4	Andrei Vasilevskiy
Mar 29	vs NSH	W 3–2	28	31	-3	63.5%	0/4	Jonas Johansson
10 games		5–5–0	27.1	25.5	1.6	51.6%	1/28

Summary: record, average SOG and SA per game, pooled xG share and power-play total for the filtered games.

Official record and season-level team metrics · cells shaded by league percentile that season

Season	GP	Record	PTS	GF	GA	Diff	P%	xGF%	CF%	GAx	PDO	PP%	PK%
2026–27 partial	9	7–2–0	14	31	23	+8	77.8	56.8	54.9	-2.5	101.0	16.7	81.8
2025–26	82	50–26–6	106	290	231	+59	64.6	55.4	52.7	-7.7	101.9	20.7	82.6
2024–25	82	47–27–8	102	294	219	+75	62.2	54.6	51.1	-7.3	103.1	25.9	81.6
2023–24	82	45–29–8	98	291	268	+23	59.8	53.5	50.9	-5.6	101.0	28.6	83.3
2022–23	82	46–30–6	98	283	254	+29	59.8	53.9	51.3	-54.7	100.9	25.4	79.7
2021–22	82	51–23–8	110	287	233	+54	67.1	54.5	50.8	-20.0	101.9	23.9	80.6
2020–21	56	36–17–3	75	181	147	+34	67.0	54.3	52.0	2.3	101.5	22.2	84.2
2019–20	70	43–21–6	92	245	195	+50	65.7	52.9	51.2	25.8	102.2	23.1	81.4

Bold marks the best full season in each column (PDO is context, so it is neither shaded nor marked). Shading uses each season’s league percentile on the five performance tiers; the in-progress season is partial.

Loading…

Every metric name opens its definition; the full list lives in Metrics.

Every section reads one season sample per situation. Five-on-five is official five-on-five strength; power play and penalty kill include 5v3, 4v3 and 6v4, and plain 6v5 is Other. Other is all situations minus the three, so situation rows sum. Power play and penalty kill are read from this team’s side, so shots against on the power play are the opponent’s shorthanded chances.

The situation filter (all situations or five-on-five) sets Season metrics, Season vs reference, On-ice rates and the Defense suppression rows, and opens the shot map on the same choice; the shot map’s own Situation select adds power play and penalty kill. The header, the percentile radar, Results, goaltending, discipline, Special teams, Form, Roster, Game log and Seasons keep the scope their own labels state.

Team ice time is the elapsed team clock from shift charts. Per-60 rates use only games with a complete clock and appear when at least 90% of games have one. Power-play opportunities, times shorthanded, penalty minutes, hits, blocks, giveaways, takeaways and faceoffs are official team box counts from the NHL game summary; official PP% and PK% use them.

Goals above expected and GSAx exclude empty-net goals. Shot-type shooting percentage is goals divided by shots on goal. High danger everywhere on this page, ranked rows and the shot-map tier filter alike, is model scoring probability of at least 0.20 (medium at least 0.08). PDO is ranked high to low but is context, not a quality grade.

One-goal games include overtime and shootout decisions, and scoring first uses the first non-shootout goal. Shot callouts exclude shots on an empty net; attempts are unblocked, because blocked shots carry no location. Blocks and hits describe volume and time defending, so they are ranked but colored as context. Penalties count minor, major, bench and match events; misconducts and penalty shots are excluded.

Special-teams rates, shorthanded goals and net goals use the widened scopes above, which can differ from the official counts by a goal or two over a season. In Season vs reference, a change is colored by whether it helps the team, and Points % appears only in all situations. Season metrics leaves out the rows the Defense table shows and, in all situations, the rows the header shows.

An em dash means unavailable, not zero. A partial season remains partial. Percentiles and ranks need at least 20 teams.

Explore the full methodology →

Season performanceAll situations · league percentiles, reference and ranked metricsCollapse

League percentile profile

Season metrics

Season vs reference

League percentile profile

Season metrics

Season vs reference

Results & record50–26–6 record · 106 points in 82 gamesExplore

Points pace

Standings

On-ice resultsElite 3.58 expected goals for per 60 in all situations (2nd of 32)Explore

Results vs expected

By situation

Score state

Defense & goaltendingStrong 2.91 expected goals against per game in all situations (7th of 32)Explore

Defensive metrics

Goaltending

Discipline

Shooting & finishingAverage -7.7 goals above expected in all situations (19th of 32)Explore

Shot locations

Finishing evidence

Goaltending evidence

Zones, for

Zones, against

Shot types, for

Shot density

Special teamsPP · PKPower play: 20.7% (17th) · Penalty kill: 82.6% (3rd)Explore

Power play

Penalty kill

FormCooling 51.6% xG share over the last 10 games vs 55.4% this season, 5–5–0Explore

Recent form

SplitsHome 26–14–1 · Away 24–12–5Explore

Record splits

By period

Lines & pairs5v5The most-used five-on-five forward lines and defense pairsExplore

Forward lines

Defense pairs

Roster36 active skatersExplore

Leaders

Skaters

Goalies

PlayoffsLost in round 1 to MTL, 3–4 · 3-4 in 7 gamesExplore

2025–26 playoffs

Series

Leading scorers

Goaltending

Playoff games

Every playoff run

Game log82 GP · Last game: L 2–4 vs NYRExplore

Seasons8 NHL seasons trackedExplore

Data notesScopes, sources and missing valuesExplore

League percentile profile

Season metrics

Season vs reference

Score state

Forward lines

Defense pairs

Shot locations

Finishing evidence

Goaltending evidence

Zones, for

Zones, against

Shot types, for