Luke Glendening

New Jersey Devils#41Center Shoots right

Age 37 · 5′11″ · 190 lb · Grand Rapids, Michigan, USA

Struggles across the offensive zone.

Season grade: F; #101 of 113 qualified F11th percentile; Performance / 60−0.1836/77 GP

Games77T-254th in NHL

Goals40.05/GP▼0.07T-467th in NHL

Assists30.04/GP▲0.03T-651st in NHL

Points70.09/GP▼0.04T-608th in NHL…

5v5 xG share—…

Avg TOI10:47758th in NHL…

Qualified · 2024–25 forwards

PlayerPeer average

What each component is built from

Offense: Expected goals for while the player is on the ice
Defense: Expected goals against while the player is on the ice (fewer is better)
Chance creation: Expected goals from the player’s own shots
Finishing: Goals minus expected goals on the player’s own shots
Assisting: Primary assists plus half of secondary assists

Each is measured against expectation, per 60 rated minutes: plus is above, minus below.

How this is calculated

Score breakdown

Component	Weight	Scaled	Contribution
Offense	25%	−0.271	−0.068
Defense	25%	0.175	+0.044
Chance creation	20%	−0.448	−0.090
Finishing	10%	−0.099	−0.010
Assisting	20%	−0.302	−0.060
Performance rate			−0.184

Per 60 rated minutes, over the scored appearances. Each component is scaled separately, then weighted; the contributions add to the performance rate at full precision, so rounded figures may differ.

Scoring

Season grade is the qualified peer percentile on the same letter bands as Game Grade — A+ ≥88, A ≥78, A− ≥68, B+ ≥58, B ≥50, B− ≥42, C+ ≥35, C ≥28, C− ≥22, D ≥15, F below 15 — and needs qualification plus at least 30 eligible peers. The letter describes this season’s performance, not permanent ability.

Comparisons

Rank and component percentiles compare this season’s qualified forwards on unrounded rates over every checked appearance; Game Grade compares one appearance with frozen historical games.

Component percentiles are never averaged into the score. Recent history is optional, from up to three completed prior seasons; small samples are provisional.

Coverage

Qualification: 16 covered appearances, 268.1 rated minutes, and 90% appearance and workload coverage. Minimums advance with league progress; valid low-sample results stay visible.

Rated minutes exclude play with a goalie pulled: 4.0 min excluded; official TOI 402.1 min.

Coverage: partial. Updated Oct 17, 2026.

Method

Five weighted components add to the performance rate. Five-on-five offense and defense account for recorded teammates, opponents and game state, so shared on-ice results are not isolated individual ability. Finishing is scored against the shot model’s historical-shooter expectation and assisting counts primary assists plus half of secondary assists; both use the strength baseline, chance creation its positional baseline.

Loading season standing and profile…

Season metrics

2024–25 · five-on-five · vs 28 positional peers

Player	Percentile	Rank
—	—	—
—	—	—
—	—	—

Player	Percentile	Rank
—	—	—
—	—	—
—	—	—
0.068		—
—	—	—

Elite90+Strong70–89Average30–69Weak10–29Poor<10No rank yetBar length is the peer percentile, so longer is always better · tick at the 50th

How to read these comparisons

Player values are recorded season results. Peer averages are arithmetic means of qualified players in the selected group; each row uses the same peers for its average and rank. Ranks use unrounded values, with tied players sharing a rank and the next rank skipped. Lower xG against ranks better. Bar colours are the five performance tiers; context rows are blue and not graded. Differences from the average describe the season, not isolated player impact.

Goals above expected is the raw goals-minus-xG rate, without the shrinkage used in the older finishing comparison. On-ice measures include teammates, opponents and deployment. These recorded metrics describe different quantities from the adjusted Season score components beside them.

Skaters need 20 appearances and 300 five-on-five minutes; quality and finishing also need 75 unblocked attempts. Early in a season these minimums scale down with games played so far. At least 30 peers must qualify. Playoff ranks are withheld. A reviewed axis whose own evidence fails is withheld and shown with its reason rather than ranked. These workload rules do not express statistical confidence.

Position uses the NHL listed primary position available now; it does not establish historical position or actual deployment. Broad groups are forwards, defence and goalies. This version uses the current model’s covered games only.

Season vs reference

Reference

Per game · all situations

Metric2024–25ReferenceDiff

0.050.12-0.07

0.040.01+0.03

0.090.14-0.04

0.660.70-0.04

Reference: 2023–24 · 81 games.

Season comparisons

Loading peer comparisons and model evidence…

Optional recent-history profile

Rolling Radar

Recent NHL history, carried across seasons. The radar compares this broader profile with a fixed position-group reference.

Rolling profile is currently unavailable.

Rolling Radar

Loading recent-history profile…

Results vs expected

Five-on-five · what happened beside the chances created and allowed

Player	Percentile	Rank
—	—	—
—	—	—
—	—	—

Player	Percentile	Rank
—	—	—
—	—	—
—	—	—

Player	Percentile	Rank
—	—	—
—	—	—
—	—	—

Context · not graded

5v5 goals: —
5v5 expected: —
EPV added: -1.01

On ice vs off ice

Tampa Bay's share with Luke Glendening on the ice against the same team without him.

Share	On ice and off ice	On-minus-off gap in percentage points
xGF%	On ice unavailable · Off ice unavailable	—
CF%	On ice unavailable · Off ice unavailable	—
GF%	On ice unavailable · Off ice unavailable	—

On iceOff ice

Scale 40–65% · marker at 50% · right column is the on-minus-off gap in points

Loading model evidence…

Defensive metrics

Five-on-five on-ice suppression; individual events in all situations.

Player	Percentile	Rank
—	—	—
—	—	—
—	—	—

Player	Percentile	Rank
—	—	—
—	—	—
—	—	—

Physical style	Player	Percentile	Rank
	—	—	—
	—	—	—

Context · not graded

Evidence coverage: high danger 38 of 76 games.

Discipline & puck management

Recorded season event counts · all situations

Penaltiesnet —

Taken —Drawn —

Puck eventsnet —

Giveaways —Takeaways —

Blocks: —
Hits: —

Both penalty counts cover 40 of 77 games with every drawn role recorded.

Loading defensive evidence…

SituationChancesViewShot type

Shot map

All 74 attempts

Goal4Shot on goal47Missed shot23Blocked shot0Larger dot = higher xG

Shooting by zone

Hover a row to light it up · click to pin

Zone	Att	G	xG	Goal rate	Exp.	G−xG
Inner slot	23	3	2.8	13.0%	12.1%	+0.2
Left circle	3	0	0.0	0.0%	1.0%	0.0
Below goal line	1	0	0.1	0.0%	5.6%	−0.1
Right circle	7	0	0.1	0.0%	1.8%	−0.1
Point	10	0	0.1	0.0%	1.3%	−0.1
Outer slot	7	0	0.3	0.0%	4.9%	−0.3
High slot	23	1	1.7	4.3%	7.3%	−0.7
All zones	74	4	5.1	5.4%	6.9%	−1.1

Finishing evidence. Scoring 5.4% on chances vs 6.9% expected (−1.5 points), with the largest shortfall in the high slot.

Sorted by goals minus expected goals. Goal rate is goals per unblocked attempt against the expected rate.

Shot profile

Context · not graded

On-net rate: 68.9%
Slot share: 62.2%
Average distance: 26.9 ft
Rebound attempts / 60: 0.51

Shot types

74 attempts

Type	Share	Sh%	G−xG
Wrist	48.6%	3.7%	−1.2
Tip-in	20.3%	42.9%	+1.8
Snap	14.9%	0.0%	−0.7
Backhand	10.8%	0.0%	−0.8
Slap	2.7%	0.0%	−0.1
Bat	1.4%	—	−0.1
Other	1.4%	—	−0.1

Share is context, not a grade. Sh% counts shots on goal only.

High-danger chances

Model goal probability ≥ 0.20

Conversion25.0%−3.6 pts vs expected

Actual25.0%

Expected28.6%

Attempts: 4
Goals: 1
Expected goals: 1.1
G−xG: −0.1

Shot locations

Loading canonical shot events…

Usage by situation

Ice time, share of team ice time, scoring and scoring rate, with where shifts start.

Scope	TOI/GP	Team share	G	A	P	P/60
Five-on-five	—	—	3	2	5	—
Power play	—	—	0	0	0	—
Penalty kill	—	—	1	1	2	—
Other	—	—	0	0	0	—
All situations	10:47	—	4	3	7	0.51

Where the 7 points come from · All situations

Goals4 · 0.29/60
Primary assists— · —/60
Secondary assists— · —/60

Zone starts — offensive of OZ + DZ

Offensive —Neutral —Defensive —

Shifts

— a game · — average

Zone starts: five-on-five · Shifts: all situations

Faceoffs

All situations · zones are read from his side of the draw · values only; no peer ranks yet

Win %: 57.0%
Draws per game: 11.44
Offensive zone: 56.0%
Defensive zone: 57.3%
Power play: 57.9%

Usage by situation

Loading usage…

Power play

— recorded ice time · peers need 100 minutes

Share of team PP: —
PP points: 0
Unit xGF / 60: —

Player	Percentile	Rank
—	—	—
—	—	—
—	—	—
—	—	—
—	—	—
—	—	—

Evidence coverage: goals 2 of 15 games · team time 40 of 77 games.

Penalty kill

— recorded ice time · peers need 100 minutes

Share of team PK: —
SH points: 2
Unit xGA / 60: —

Player	Percentile	Rank
—	—	—
—	—	—
—	—	—
—	—	—
—	—	—

Evidence coverage: goals 20 of 75 games · high danger 21 of 75 games · team time 40 of 77 games.

Loading special teams…

Split	GP	G	A	P	P/GP	5v5 xG share	Team record
Venue
Home	38	4	1	5	0.13	46.9%	27–8–3
Away	39	0	2	2	0.05	40.0%	17–18–4
Rest
Back-to-back	11	0	0	0	0.00	35.1%	5–6–0
1 day of rest	49	1	3	4	0.08	47.0%	27–15–7
2+ days of rest	16	3	0	3	0.19	39.8%	11–5–0
Opponent
vs Eastern	45	2	1	3	0.07	39.4%	24–14–7
vs Western	32	2	2	4	0.13	49.5%	20–12–0
vs playoff teams	39	2	1	3	0.08	44.2%	18–19–2
vs non-playoff teams	38	2	2	4	0.11	42.6%	26–7–5
Recent
Last 10	10	0	0	0	0.00	28.1%	5–3–2

Teammate	Pos	TOI together	xG share together	GF–GA	CF%	Him without	Teammate without
Zemgus Girgensons	C	442:51	52.9%	30–20	49.1%	37.1%	48.6%
Michael Eyssimont	C	260:15	51.8%	13–14	51.9%	42.8%	49.4%
Emil Lilleberg	D	257:42	44.7%	13–12	46.3%	47.7%	51.8%
Nick Perbix	D	236:22	41.8%	11–8	44.4%	49.0%	54.5%
Ryan McDonagh	D	190:33	54.0%	7–7	42.3%	44.3%	53.6%
Victor Hedman	D	188:36	46.3%	9–6	44.5%	46.6%	53.8%
Darren Raddysh	D	179:54	43.6%	14–9	44.4%	47.6%	52.7%
Erik Cernak	D	164:21	49.7%	5–7	40.2%	45.7%	53.2%
Mitchell Chaffee	R	150:27	35.9%	6–8	36.5%	50.1%	45.0%
Cam Atkinson	R	144:09	49.0%	6–5	47.8%	45.7%	34.1%
J.J. Moser	D	141:26	46.9%	8–5	47.0%	46.4%	52.8%
Gage Goncalves	C	62:22	38.9%	1–2	50.5%	47.0%	50.7%

	Opponent	Result		G	A		PPP	+/−	SOG		5v5 on-ice xG share	Game
Apr 30	vs FLA	L 3–6	8:59	0	1	1	0	1	0	0.00	70.7%	View →
Apr 28	@ FLA	L 2–4	8:59	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.00	27.1%	View →
Apr 26	@ FLA	W 5–1	10:47	1	0	1	0	1	1	0.11	78.4%	View →
Apr 24	vs FLA	L 0–2	10:11	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.06	55.8%	View →
Apr 22	vs FLA	L 2–6	9:41	0	0	0	—	0	0	0.00	67.8%	View →
Filtered 5	—	1–4	9:43 avg	1	1	2	—	2	1	0.16	61.0%	—

Season	GP	G	A	P	SOG	P/GP	5v5 ixG/60	5v5 GP
2025–26	10	1	0	1	5	0.10	0.19	10
2024–25	5	1	1	2	1	0.40	0.29	5
2023–24	5	0	0	0	4	0.00	0.56	5
2022–23	17	2	1	3	15	0.18	0.47	17
2021–22	6	0	0	0	4	0.00	0.34	6
2015–16	5	0	1	1	5	0.20	0.43	5

	Opponent	Result		PPP	+/−	SOG		5v5 on-ice xG share	Game
Apr 9	vs TOR	OTL 3–4 OT	2:37	—	0	0	0.00	—	View →
Apr 7	@ NYR	W 5–1	11:58	0	0	1	0.07	11.1%	View →
Apr 5	@ BUF	OTL 2–3 SO	9:15	—	0	0	0.06	65.1%	View →
Apr 3	@ OTT	L 1–2	9:35	0	0	0	0.00	23.7%	View →
Mar 29	vs NYI	W 5–3	12:04	—	-1	0	0.00	10.4%	View →
Mar 27	vs UTA	W 8–0	13:31	—	1	0	0.00	30.8%	View →
Mar 25	vs PIT	W 6–1	12:14	—	0	1	0.01	9.4%	View →
Mar 23	@ VGK	L 2–4	10:57	0	0	2	0.18	84.0%	View →
Mar 22	@ UTA	L 4–6	8:04	0	-1	0	0.00	13.7%	View →
Mar 20	@ DAL	W 3–2 SO	9:16	—	0	0	0.00	29.8%	View →
Filtered 10	—	5–3–2	9:57 avg	—	-1	4	0.31	—	—

Split	G	A	P	5v5 xG share	5v5 CF%	5v5 GF–GA
Period
1st period	2	0	2	—	—	—
2nd period	1	1	2	—	—	—
3rd period	1	2	3	—	—	—
Overtime	0	0	0	—	—	—
Score state · 5v5 on ice
Leading	—	—	—	44.6%	40.4%	14–12
Tied	—	—	—	47.6%	46.4%	10–11
Trailing	—	—	—	48.7%	51.2%	10–4

Season			Box score · all situations												5v5 individual				5v5 on ice					Season performance
Season	Age	Team	GP	G	A	P	+/−	PIM	SOG	Sh%	PPG	TOI/GP	Hits	Blk	P/60	ixG/60	SOG/60	xG/UA	xGF/60	xGA/60	xGF%	CF%	GF%	Perf/60	Grade	Rank
2025–26	36	NJD, PHI	70	2	7	9	-7	8	50	4.0	0	10:32	—	—	0.79	0.51	4.83	0.080	1.66	2.31	41.8	41.0	—	—	—	—
2024–25	35	TBL	77	4	3	7	-9	10	51	7.8	0	10:47	—	—	—	—	—	0.068	—	—	—	—	—	-0.184	F	101 / 113
2023–24	34	TBL	81	10	1	11	-2	39	57	17.5	0	11:37	—	—	0.73	0.40	3.81	0.067	1.41	2.24	38.6	41.3	—	—	—	—
2022–23	33	DAL	70	3	3	6	-9	50	65	4.6	0	12:04	—	—	0.27	0.55	4.80	0.065	1.90	2.48	43.5	48.3	—	—	—	—
2021–22	32	DAL	82	9	7	16	-17	15	116	7.8	0	14:07	—	—	0.78	0.66	6.22	0.073	1.86	2.25	45.3	44.9	—	—	—	—
2020–21	31	DET	54	6	9	15	3	20	67	9.0	0	14:48	—	—	1.13	0.52	5.73	0.066	1.83	2.48	42.4	43.8	—	—	—	—
2019–20	30	DET	60	6	3	9	-29	14	76	7.9	0	15:21	—	—	0.34	0.49	5.15	0.065	1.44	2.53	36.3	41.2	—	—	—	—
2018–19	29	DET	78	10	13	23	2	15	102	9.8	0	15:47	—	—	1.20	0.58	5.42	0.074	2.09	2.77	43.0	42.4	—	—	—	—
2017–18	28	DET	69	11	8	19	-14	17	88	12.5	1	13:12	—	—	1.11	0.55	5.91	0.070	2.11	2.47	46.1	44.2	—	—	—	—
2016–17	27	DET	74	3	11	14	-10	26	76	3.9	0	12:55	—	—	0.94	0.56	5.26	0.077	1.80	2.24	44.6	43.0	—	—	—	—
2015–16	26	DET	81	8	13	21	4	46	88	9.1	0	14:35	—	—	1.09	0.56	5.16	0.073	2.13	2.47	46.3	45.1	—	—	—	—
Career	—	11 seasons	796	72	78	150	-88	260	836	8.6	1	13:12	—	—	—	—	—	0.071	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—

Luke Glendening

Season performanceSelected-season standing and the components behind the scoreCollapse

Score breakdown

Scoring

Comparisons

Coverage

Method

Season metrics

Season vs reference

Season comparisons

Rolling Radar

Rolling Radar

On-ice impact5v5What the team creates and allows during the player’s five-on-five minutesWhat the team creates and allows during the player’s five-on-five minutesExplore

Results vs expected

On ice vs off ice

Defense5v5 · AllOn-ice suppression and individual disciplineOn-ice suppression and individual disciplineExplore

Defensive metrics

Discipline & puck management

Penaltiesnet —

Puck eventsnet —

Shooting & finishingWhere the player shoots, the quality of those chances, and actual versus expected goalsWhere the player shoots, the quality of those chances, and actual versus expected goalsExplore

Shot map

Shooting by zone

Shot profile

Shot types

High-danger chances

Shot locations

Usage & deployment10:47 TOI per gameScoring by situation, zone starts and workloadExplore

Usage by situation

Where the 7 points come from · All situations

Zone starts — offensive of OZ + DZ

Shifts

Faceoffs

Usage by situation

Special teamsPP · PKPower play and penalty killPower play and penalty killExplore

Power play

Penalty kill

FormExplore

Rolling Radar

Splits0.13 points per game at home · 0.05 awayVenue, rest and opponentExplore

By period and score state

Linemates5v5Most often with Zemgus Girgensons: 443 five-on-five minutes, 52.9% xG share togetherExplore

Playoffs5 playoff games: 1 goal, 2 points · 48 career playoff gamesExplore

2024–25 playoffs

Playoff games

Every playoff run

Game log77 games · most recent vs TOR, L 3–4: 0 G, 0 AOfficial totals and five-on-five evidenceExplore

Career11 NHL seasons: 796 games, 150 pointsEvery season and a recomputed career lineExplore

Data notesScopes, missing values and model evidenceExplore

Score breakdown

Scoring

Comparisons

Coverage

Method

2024–25 playoffs

Playoff games

Every playoff run

Defensive metrics

Discipline & puck management

Penaltiesnet —

Puck eventsnet —

Power play

Penalty kill

Results vs expected

On ice vs off ice

Shot map

Shooting by zone

Shot profile

Shot types

High-danger chances

Usage by situation

Where the 7 points come from · All situations

Zone starts — offensive of OZ + DZ

Shifts

Faceoffs

By period and score state

Season metrics

Season vs reference